Submitted:
24 October 2024
Posted:
28 October 2024
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Materials
2.1.1. Porous Clay
2.1.2. Lemon Essential Oil
2.1.2. Preparation of the Clay/Essential Oil Mixture
2.2. Theoretical Considerations
2.2.1. Diffusion Model
2.2.2. Advanced Models
2.2.3. Assumptions
2.2.4. Model of Mass Transfer by Diffusion
2.2.5. Mathematical Framework
2.2.6. Boundary and Initial Conditions
2.2.7. Analytical Solution
2.3. Experimentation and Modeling - Essentials
2.3.1. Insecticidal Activity Test
2.3.2. Optimization of Transfer Conditions
2.3.3. Study of Insecticidal Activity Behavior of Essential Oil Mixture in Clay Porous Media
| Diameter (cm) | Temperature (°C) | LD50 (a) for RC | (b) for RC | LD50 (a) for GC | (b) for GC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| D1 = 1 | T1 = 25 | 0.228 | 0.110 | 0.229 | 0.115 |
| T2 = 30 | 0.350 | 0.109 | 0.349 | 0.111 | |
| T3 = 35 | 0.035 | 0.017 | 0.036 | 0.018 | |
| D2 = 2 | T1 = 25 | 0.529 | 0.032 | 0.530 | 0.034 |
| T2 = 30 | 0.758 | 0.008 | 0.759 | 0.009 | |
| T3 = 35 | 0.021 | 0.007 | 0.022 | 0.007 | |
| D3 = 3 | T1 = 25 | ≫ 0.056 | 0.016 | ≫ 0.057 | 0.017 |
| T2 = 30 | 0.061 | 0.017 | 0.062 | 0.018 | |
| T3 = 35 | 0.013 | 0.005 | 0.014 | 0.006 |
2.4. The Bioinformatics Approach
2.5. Computer and Statistical Processing
3. Results and Analysis
3.1. Chemical Characterization of RC and GC Clay Media
3.2. Chemical characterization of essential oil of Citrus limonum:
3.3. Insecticidal Activities in Porous Clay Media
3.4. Optimization of Essential Oil Transfer Conditions in Porous Media
3.5. Modeling the Diffusion Process of Citrus Limonum Essential Oil (EOCL) in Porous Media RC and GC
3.6. Interaction of Essential Oils in Porous Media and Insecticidal Efficacy
3.7. Bioinformatic Studies
4. Conclusions
References
- Sabry, A.H.; Abdel-Aziz, M.I. Potential of Some Insecticides for Managing the Granary Weevil, Sitophilus granarius, and the Development of Resistance. Egypt J Biol Pest Control. 2020, 30, 50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gambacorta, G.; Faccia, M.; Pati, S.; Lamacchia, C.; La Gatta, B. Effects of Conventional and Alternative Pesticides on Wheat Quality and Safety. Food Res Int. 2020, 131, 108998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khammour, F.; Abdoul-Latif, F.M.; Ainane, A.; Mohamed, J.; Ainane, T. Eco-friendly adsorbent from waste of mint: application for the removal of hexavalent chromium. J Chem. 2021, 2021, 8848964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cao, J.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, H.; Fu, Z.; Guo, L. Advances in Encapsulation of Essential Oils into Porous Supports: Application in Pest Control. J Clean Prod. 2022, 346, 131136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ouassil, M.; Mohamed Abdoul-Latif, F.; Am, A.; Attahar, W.; Ainane, A.; Ainane, T. Chemical composition of bay laurel and rosemary essential oils from Morocco and their antifungal activity against Fusarium strains. Pharmacologyonline. 2021, 426–433. [Google Scholar]
- Hasan, M.M.; Haque, E.; Hossain, M. Insecticidal Properties of Essential Oils Against Grain Storage Pests: Recent Advances. Trends Food Sci Technol. 2021, 109, 60–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mohamed Abdoul-Latif F, Elmi A, Merito A, et al. Chemical analysis of essential oils of Cymbopogon schoenanthus (L.) Spreng. and Nepeta azurea R. Br. ex Benth from Djibouti, in-vitro cytotoxicity against cancer cell lines and antibacterial activities. Appl Sci. 2022, 12, 8699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Montoya-García CM, Muñoz-Huerta RF, Rueda-Puente E, Pérez-Flores LJ, Rodríguez-Mendoza NM, Luna-Suárez S, et al. Alternative Pest Control in Stored Grain Using Essential Oils: A Global Perspective. Agronomy. 2021, 11, 2075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- López, M.D.; Jordán, M.J.; Pascual-Villalobos, M.J. Toxic Compounds in Essential Oils of Spices and Medicinal Plants: Structural Characteristics and Mechanisms of Action Against Stored Product Insects. J Stored Prod Res. 2021, 93, 101821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khalid, S.; Bashir, M.A.; Afzal, M.; Qasim, M.; Afzal, I. Botanical Insecticides: A Green Approach in Stored Grain Pest Management. Agriculture. 2020, 10, 101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rouissi, T.; Montibus, M.; Choupeaux-Nicolle, L.; Belzunces, L.P.; Frédéric, L. Genetic and Molecular Basis of Insecticide Resistance in the Granary Weevil, Sitophilus granarius. Insects. 2023, 14, 474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Islam, M.S.; Hasan, M.M.; Hossain, M.A. Evaluating the Bioactivity of Citrus Essential Oils Against Stored Grain Insects. Foods. 2021, 10, 1062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nenaah, G.E. Chemical Composition and Insecticidal Activity of Essential Oils from Four Citrus Species Against Sitophilus granarius. J Pest Sci. 2022, 95, 1129–1142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shybat, Z.L.; Mohamed Abdoul-Latif, F.; Mohamed, J.; Ainane, A.; Ainane, T. Antifungal activity of the essential oil of Moroccan myrtle (Myrtus communis L.): application in agriculture. Pharmacologyonline 2021, 485–491. [Google Scholar]
- Abdallah, M.; Ali, R.; Emam, H.E. Advanced Biopolymer-Based Carriers for the Controlled Release of Essential Oils as Biopesticides. J Appl Polym Sci. 2024, 141, 52001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ainane, A.; Taleb, M.; El-Hajjaji, F.; Hammouti, B.; Chetouani, A.; Ainane, T. Study of dependence between two types of most abundant natural clays in Bejaad province (Central Morocco) using a statistical approach. Moroccan J Chem. 2021, 9. [Google Scholar]
- Aliouane, T.; Boudouma, A.; Bensaoula, H.; Trari, M. Structural and Optical Properties of Clay-Based Materials: A Study Using FT-IR and UV-Vis Spectroscopy. Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc. 2022, 270, 120796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Atemni I, Ouafi R, Hjouji K, et al. Extraction and characterization of natural hydroxyapatite derived from animal bones using the thermal treatment process. Emergent Mater. 2023, 6, 551–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Morin, C.; Vandewalle, N.; Faidallah, H.; Zarhri, Z. Thermogravimetric Analysis of Natural Clays: Determining the Decomposition Behavior Under Nitrogen Atmosphere. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2021, 146, 83–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mohamed Abdoul-Latif F, Elmi A, Merito A, et al. Essential oils of Ocimum basilicum L. and Ocimum americanum L. from Djibouti: chemical composition, antimicrobial and cytotoxicity evaluations. Processes. 2022, 10, 1785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ainane A, Benhima R, Khammour F, et al. Composition chimique et activité insecticide de cinq huiles essentielles: Cedrus atlantica, Citrus limonum, Eucalyptus globules, Rosmarinus officinalis et Syzygium aromaticum. Proc Biosune. 2018, 1, 67–79. [Google Scholar]
- El Koubali, M.; Baddi, G.A.; Rhihil, A.; Aouad, A.; Kachkoul, R. Preparation and Characterization of Moroccan Natural Clays with Essential Oils for Potential Insecticidal Applications. Appl Clay Sci. 2024, 238, 106006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yu, B.; Zhang, J.; Wu, J.; Zhang, P.; Wu, L. Fickian and Non-Fickian Diffusion of Essential Oils in Porous Media: Insights from Experiments and Simulations. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2022, 61, 1735–1747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ainane A, Abdoul-Latif FM, Mohamed J, et al. Behaviour desorption study of the essential oil of Cedrus atlantica in a porous clay versus insecticidal activity against Sitophilus granarius: explanation of the phenomenon by statistical studies. Int J Metrol Qual Eng. 2021, 12, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ainane T, Mohamed Abdoul-Latif F, Am A, et al. Antagonistic antifungal activities of Mentha suaveolens and Artemisia absinthium essential oils from Morocco. Antagonistic antifungal activities of Mentha suaveolens and Artemisia absinthium essential oils from Morocco. Pharmacologyonline. 2021, 470–478. [Google Scholar]
- Gao, X.; Xu, Z.; Zhang, L.; Li, W. Nonlinear Diffusion and Sorption Kinetics of Natural Oils in Clay-Based Materials: Temperature and Humidity Effects. Langmuir. 2023, 39, 2079–2088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Crank, J. The Mathematics of Diffusion, 2nd ed.; Oxford University Press, 1979. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, C.; Liu, F.; Zhang, Q. Diffusion and Desorption of Essential Oils in Porous Media: Cylindrical Geometry Considerations. Chem Eng Sci. 2020, 223, 115742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shao, L.; Cheng, X.; Zhang, R.; Yin, P.; Wang, Y. Evaporation and Diffusion Dynamics of Volatile Oils in Porous Clays: Application to Pest Control. J Agric Food Chem. 2022, 70, 9136–9144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abdellaoui, M.; Chahbouni, M.; El Bouardi, A.; Mokhlisse, A. A Study on the Rearing and Susceptibility of Sitophilus granarius Populations to Natural Insecticides. J Entomol Res. 2022, 46, 45–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Elhassaneen, Y.; El-Zahar, K.; Sabra, A.S. Evaluation of Citrus Essential Oils Against Sitophilus granarius: Impact on Mortality and Grain Quality. J Stored Prod Res. 2021, 92, 101778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abdoul-Latif, F.M.; Ainane, A.; Abdoul-Latif, T.M.; Ainane, T. Chemical study and evaluation of insecticidal properties of African Lippia citriodora essential oil. J Biopesticides. 2020, 13, 119–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mohamed Abdoul-Latif F, El Montassir Z, Ainane A, et al. Use of Thymus plants as an ecological filler in urea-formaldehyde adhesives intended for bonding plywood. Processes. 2022, 10, 2209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shaaban, M.; Bayoumi, A.E.; Hafez, R.A. Lethal Dose and Toxicity Assessments of Essential Oils on Sitophilus granarius: Application in Integrated Pest Management. J Pest Sci. 2022, 95, 723–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khadri, F.A.; Ali, W.; Khan, M.A. Factorial Design and Statistical Optimization of Essential Oil Transfer in Porous Clays: A Case Study. J Chem Technol Biotechnol. 2021, 96, 1556–1563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Singh, R.S.; Gupta, P.; Das, S.K. Modeling and Optimization of Evaporation Rates in Essential Oil-Clay Systems Using Factorial Design. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2020, 59, 20998–21006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ribes S, Saidi N, Luyckx M, Ferrari B, Lachtar S, Saadaoui H, et al. Application of Principal Component Analysis (PCA) to Assess the Efficiency of Natural Insecticides in Different Porous Media. Chemom Intell Lab Syst. 2022, 226, 104555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Farhat, R.; Hassan, S.; Chenini, S.; Zouari, N. Statistical Approaches in Evaluating the Insecticidal Activity of Essential Oils in Porous Supports Using PCA. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023, 30, 40761–40773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ghanmi, K.; Boussadia, C.; Saidi, K.; Ghemati, S. Computational Study on the Interaction of Limonene with Key Proteins 2NXX and 1C3Z: Implications for Biological Mechanisms and Docking Applications. J Mol Graph Model. 2023, 120, 108022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ghanty, T.K.; Chakraborty, M. Molecular Docking and Force Field Studies on Limonene for Protein Binding: A Theoretical Approach. Theor Chem Acc. 2022, 141, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mohamed Abdoul-Latif, F.; Ainane, A.; Achenani, L.; et al. Production of fucoxanthin from microalgae Isochrysis galbana of Djibouti: optimization, correlation with antioxidant potential, and bioinformatics approaches. Mar Drugs. 2024, 22, 358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kessler, H.; Pfaffenberger, M.; Retey, J. Protein Docking and Interaction Analysis of Ultraspiracle Receptor from Tribolium castaneum and Limonene: A Structural Perspective. Biochim Biophys Acta Proteins Proteom. 2023, 1871, 140929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tang, Y.; Sun, J.; Yan, H.; Wang, R. Solvent Accessibility and Functional Analysis of the Ultraspiracle Receptor in Insects: Insights from Molecular Dynamics Simulations. J Mol Graph Model. 2021, 108, 107979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sheng, M.; Li, Y.; Liu, X.; Wang, L. Structural and Functional Analysis of Antifreeze Protein THP12 from Tenebrio molitor: Implications for Cold Adaptation. J Mol Struct. 2022, 1261, 132835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- García-Martín, D.; Martí-Renom, M.A.; Sanz, F.; Pastor, M. Exploring Protein-Ligand Interactions with Docking Simulations: The Case of Limonene and Insect Receptor Proteins. J Chem Inf Model. 2021, 61, 2085–2097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Duan, C.; Li, L.; Liu, Z.; Zhang, Y. Molecular Docking Studies and DFT-Based Optimization of Limonene Interaction with Insect Receptors. J Mol Model. 2023, 29, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Y.; Sun, H.; Zhang, Q.; Li, D. Application of MATLAB for Numerical Modeling and Statistical Analysis in Material Science. Comput Mater Sci. 2020, 171, 109194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, L.; Huang, Y.; Zhu, M.; Li, Q. Integration of Computational Tools for Data Analysis and Visualization in Environmental Studies. J Environ Sci. 2022, 116, 42–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, Y.; Ren, H.; Wang, H.; Li, X. XRD Characterization of Clay Minerals in Sedimentary Environments: Implications for Diagenetic Processes. Sediment Geol. 2021, 419, 106054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang Y, Liu W, Zhou J, et al. Mineralogical Analysis of Clay Samples Using XRD: Insights into Formation and Diagenetic Conditions. Appl Clay Sci. 2023, 234, 106876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yao, L.; Chen, L.; Gao, P.; Zhang, Z. XRF Analysis of Mineral Compositions in Clay Samples: Differentiation Between Environmental and Geological Processes. Geochem J. 2022, 56, 263–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qiu, Y.; Jin, Z.; Zhao, H.; Yang, C. XRF and XRD Combined Analysis for Mineralogical Studies of Clay Samples from Sedimentary Basins. Miner Mag. 2020, 84, 505–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu Q, Zhang X, Shen J, et al. FTIR Spectroscopic Analysis of Clay Minerals: Correlation Between Absorption Bands and Mineral Composition. Vib Spectrosc. 2021, 114, 103233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mahjoub R, Seddek A, Ahmed S, et al. FTIR and SEM-EDX Characterization of Natural Clays: Implications for the Study of Clay Mineralogy. Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc. 2023, 295, 122604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang M, Wang C, Sun Z, et al. SEM and EDX Analysis of Weathered Clays: Understanding Morphological and Compositional Changes. Appl Geochem. 2021, 128, 104922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Y.; Li, J.; Zhan, Y.; Zhao, X. Morphological and Elemental Analysis of Sedimentary Clays: A Comparative Study Using SEM-EDX. Micron. 2023, 167, 103389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alkhazraji A, Alhashemi B, Youssef K, et al. Thermogravimetric Analysis of Clay Minerals: Identifying Phases of Mass Loss and Thermal Decomposition. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2022, 147, 781–793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao R, Yang L, Wang P, et al. Thermogravimetric and Differential Thermal Analysis of Kaolinite and Illite in Clay Samples.
- Nasser AL-Jabri, N.; Aflah, N. Comparative Analysis of Lemon Essential Oils from Turkey and India: Chemical Composition and Biological Activities. J Essent Oil Res. 2022, 34, 137–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Njoku, V.N.; Evbuomwan, B.O.; Ude, N.O. Extraction and Characterization of Lemon (Citrus limon) Essential Oil. Int J Multidisc Res Dev. 2016, 3, 130–136. [Google Scholar]
- Bertuzzi, T.; Rastelli, S.; Mulazzi, A.; Pietri, A. Chemical composition and variability of lemon essential oil (Citrus limon) in relation to cultivation areas and fruit maturation stages. J Agric Food Chem. 2013, 61, 1387–1394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Himd, A.; Ouali, K.; Boudoukha, C.; Gherraf, N.; Zeghichi, M.T. Characterization and Antibacterial Activity of Lemon (Citrus limon) Peel Essential Oil. Int J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2016, 8, 297–301. [Google Scholar]
- Moufida, S.; Marzouk, B. Biochemical Characterization of Blood Orange, Sweet Orange, Lemon, Bergamot and Bitter Orange. J Agric Food Chem. 2003, 51, 6398–6404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Haddad M, Bennis N, Belmekki A, et al. Enhanced Insecticidal Efficacy of Essential Oils Supported on Porous Clays Against Sitophilus granarius. J Pest Sci. 2021, 94, 539–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Taoufik M, Cherifi Z, Bouharroud R, et al. Influence of Temperature and Application Methods on the Insecticidal Activity of Citrus Essential Oils in Stored Grain Pest Control. J Stored Prod Res. 2022, 96, 101992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Boukaew S, Prasertsan P, Siriamornpun S, et al. Role of Porous Supports in Enhancing the Stability and Insecticidal Activity of Essential Oils Against Stored Product Pests. Ind Crops Prod. 2023, 192, 115888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, Z.; Li, M.; Sun, Y.; Wang, J. Temperature-Dependent Desorption Kinetics of Essential Oils from Clay Matrices: Implications for Insecticidal Activity. J Agric Food Chem. 2021, 69, 3883–3892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, Y.J.; Ahn, Y.J. Enhanced Release and Insecticidal Efficacy of Essential Oils from Clay Supports Under Elevated Temperatures. J Pest Sci. 2020, 93, 1331–1343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mahdavi V, Tohidi M, Abedi G, et al. The Impact of Concentration on the Desorption Behavior of Essential Oils in Porous Supports: Applications for Prolonged Insecticidal Action. Chem Eng Sci. 2023, 260, 117987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mahrishi, S.; Bhattacharyya, R.; Kumar, D.; Singh, B. Influence of Particle Size on the Desorption Dynamics of Essential Oils in Clay Media. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2022, 61, 1245–1257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, L.; Ren, H.; Zhang, L.; Hu, Z. Effect of Clay Mass on the Desorption Rate and Insecticidal Performance of Essential Oils in Controlled Release Systems. J Chem Technol Biotechnol. 2021, 96, 2450–2458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, Q.; Zhou, J.; Gao, Y.; Sun, W. Optimizing the Release Kinetics of Essential Oils in Clay-Based Insecticidal Formulations: A Comprehensive Analysis. J Clean Prod. 2023, 364, 132761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ortega, L.F.; Franco, L.A.; Palacios, S.M. Modeling LD50 Values in Insecticidal Assays: A Case Study with Lemon Essential Oil and Stored Product Pests. J Econ Entomol. 2022, 115, 78–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, X.; Zhang, W.; Peng, Q.; Wang, H. Optimization of Essential Oil Evaporation Flux in Porous Media Using Factorial Design: A Case Study in Clays. Chem Eng Res Des. 2021, 167, 215–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen Z, Zhou Y, Liu W, et al. Modeling Essential Oil Flux in Porous Clays: Effects of Concentration, Temperature, and Particle Size. J Chem Technol Biotechnol. 2022, 97, 1480–1492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, Y.; Luo, S.; Zhang, X. Analyzing Interactions Between Factors Affecting Essential Oil Flux in Porous Supports Using 3D Modeling. Ind Crops Prod. 2023, 189, 115936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pérez-Martínez, E.; Gómez-Nieto, M.A.; Hernández-Córdoba, M. Evaluating Predictive Models for Essential Oil Flux in Porous Media: Insights from Statistical Analysis. J Chem Inf Model. 2021, 61, 4390–4402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao H, Sun X, Chen S, et al. Statistical Optimization and Model Validation for Essential Oil Transfer in Porous Media. Chem Eng Sci. 2023, 259, 117941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abatzoglou, N.; Barmpalexis, P.; Kostoglou, M. Modeling of Essential Oil Desorption from Porous Materials: Application to Fickian Diffusion Processes. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2020, 59, 19891–19901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tiwari, G.; Tiwari, R.; Srivastava, B.; Rai, A.K. Mathematical Modeling and Simulation of Essential Oil Diffusion in Porous Clays: A Fickian Approach. J Chem Phys. 2022, 156, 104503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lu Z, Zhang J, Hu W, et al. Comparative Analysis of Diffusion Models for Essential Oils in Different Porous Media: The Case of Red and Green Clays. J Porous Mater. 2021, 28, 1405–1416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yousefi, A.; Shahsavar, M.; Hosseini, M.J. Simulation and Optimization of Essential Oil Diffusion in Clay-Based Media for Agricultural Applications. Chem Eng Sci. 2023, 252, 117501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pohl, A.; Karczewska, B.; Żmuda, E. Study on Adsorption and Desorption Processes of Essential Oils in Porous Clays: Implications for Activation Energy and Retention Capacity. Appl Clay Sci. 2021, 205, 106036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ng KH, Lam SS, Mun SP, et al. Multivariate Analysis of Essential Oil Performance in Porous Supports: Application of Principal Component Analysis in Kinetic Studies. J Mol Liq. 2023, 380, 121694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ribeiro A, Marques P, Ferreira R, et al. Correlating Evaporation Flux and Insecticidal Activity of Essential Oils in Clays Using Principal Component Analysis. J Chem Inf Model. 2022, 62, 1123–1131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang Y, Chen L, Zhu J, et al. Understanding the Diffusion-Evaporation Relationship of Essential Oils in Clay Media: Insights from Principal Component Analysis. Ind Crops Prod. 2022, 185, 115096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mahdavi V, Bahrami A, Hashemzadeh R, et al. Multivariate Analysis of Desorption and Insecticidal Efficacy of Essential Oils in Porous Media: A Case Study with Red and Green Clays. Chemosphere. 2022, 308, 136354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pehlivanoglu, M.; Saglam, O. Evaluating the Diffusion and Evaporation Dynamics of Essential Oils in Clay Media Using Principal Component Analysis. Appl Clay Sci. 2021, 204, 106008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang X, Tian Z, Liu L, et al. Principal Component Analysis in Insecticidal Studies: Understanding the Interactions Between Diffusion and Evaporation in Essential Oil-Impregnated Clays. J Hazard Mater. 2023, 442, 130012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zouari N, Ayari H, Smaoui S, et al. Analyzing the Effects of Diffusion and Evaporation on Insecticidal Activity: A PCA Approach with Citrus Essential Oils. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022, 29, 22451–22461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yildirim N, Sen B, Gul S, et al. Energetic Analysis and Molecular Orbital Studies of Limonene: Insights into Chemical Stability and Reactivity. Comput Theor Chem. 2021, 1203, 113355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu Y, Liu X, Li J, et al. Molecular Docking Studies and Energetic Characterization of Limonene with Insect Receptor Proteins. J Mol Graph Model. 2023, 122, 108080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dong Z, Li Y, Zhang L, et al. Comparative Binding Affinity and Stability of Limonene with Insect Receptors: Insights from Molecular Docking Studies. J Mol Graph Model. 2021, 104, 107826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Verma A, Joshi K, Jain SK, et al. Docking and Binding Affinity Analysis of Limonene with Insect and Human Receptor Proteins. J Biomol Struct Dyn. 2022, 40, 2904–2914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Singh RK, Chikara C, Sharma A, et al. Evaluation of Ligand Efficiency and Binding Affinity in Protein-Limonene Interactions: A Computational Study. J Comput Aided Mol Des. 2020, 34, 1215–1230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar, P.; Rawat, S.; Misra, G. Conformational Analysis and Binding Affinity of Limonene with Target Proteins: A Molecular Docking Perspective. J Mol Struct. 2023, 1282, 135083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Joo K, Kim D, Kim J, et al. Principal Component Analysis of Docking Parameters: Understanding Ligand Efficiency and Binding Affinity in Protein-Ligand Complexes. J Chem Inf Model. 2022, 62, 749–759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Banerjee, S.; Poddar, A.; Chakraborty, S. Multivariate Analysis of Docking Results: A Focus on Ligand Efficiency and Binding Free Energy Correlations. Comput Biol Chem. 2023, 99, 107799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang X, Zhang Z, Li P, et al. Protein-Ligand Interaction Analysis Using Principal Component Analysis: Implications for Drug Design. ACS Omega. 2021, 6, 19826–19836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maiti, R.; Reddy, P.; Sobhia, M.E. Correlation Analysis in Protein-Ligand Docking: A Comprehensive Study Using Principal Component Analysis. J Mol Model. 2023, 29, 77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]














| Test | Factor 1 (C) | Factor 2 (T) | Factor 3 (D) | Factor 4 (M) | F (×10⁴) (g·h⁻¹·cm⁻¹) for RC | F (×10⁴) (g·h⁻¹·cm⁻¹) for GC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 1.2732 | 1.8687 |
| 2 | 1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 3.8197 | 2.886 |
| 3 | -1 | 1 | -1 | -1 | 2.5464 | 2.1248 |
| 4 | 1 | 1 | -1 | -1 | 11.4591 | 6.2191 |
| 5 | -1 | -1 | 1 | -1 | 1.2732 | 1.6471 |
| 6 | 1 | -1 | 1 | -1 | 1.2732 | 1.4987 |
| 7 | -1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 2.5464 | 2.5367 |
| 8 | 1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 2.5464 | 3.5786 |
| 9 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 1 | 0.6366 | 1.3582 |
| 10 | 1 | -1 | -1 | 1 | 0.6366 | 1.2191 |
| 11 | -1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 2.2281 | 2.7483 |
| 12 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 2.5464 | 3.1296 |
| 13 | -1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 1.2732 | 1.9371 |
| 14 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 1.2732 | 2.1582 |
| 15 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2.8647 | 3.7489 |
| 16 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3.5014 | 4.5672 |
| Property | Symbol | Equation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| Energy Gap | EGAP | ELUMO - EHOMO | Difference in energy between LUMO and HOMO orbitals. |
| Chemical Hardness | η | Measure of a molecule resistance to change in electron distribution. | |
| Electronegativity | χ | Ability of an atom or molecule to attract electrons. | |
| Electrophilicity Index | ω | Quantifies the electrophilic nature of a molecule. | |
| Molecular Flexibility | S | Indicates the flexibility of a molecule based on its chemical hardness. |
| Protein | 2NXX | 1C3Z |
|---|---|---|
| Size (Å) | x = 146; y = 140; z = 188 | x = 73; y = 59; z = 49 |
| Center (Å) | x = 146 y = 140 z = 188 |
x = 1.217 y = 1.626 z = -8.302 |
| Samples | Al2O3 | CaO | Fe2O3 | K2O | MgO | Na2O | P2O5 | SO3 | SiO2 | TiO2 | LOI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RC | 17,03 | 0,68 | 32,47 | 3,27 | 1,24 | 3,60 | 0,10 | 0,01 | 33,40 | 0,69 | 8,35 |
| GC | 29,06 | 0,58 | 1,61 | 4,06 | 1,27 | 3,85 | 0,11 | 0,01 | 52,17 | 1,00 | 6.74 |
| Élément | GC (%) | RC (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Si | 27.26 | 15.49 |
| Al | 18.7 | 10.74 |
| O | 48.76 | 36.34 |
| Fe | - | 23.27 |
| Mg | - | 2.87 |
| K | 5.28 | 2.87 |
| C | - | 8.41 |
| Total | 100 | 100 |
| Pic | Compounds | RT | RI | Area % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | α-Thujene | 5.504 | 732.41 | 0.53 |
| 2 | α-Pinene | 5.733 | 750.68 | 4.84 |
| 3 | Camphene | 6.199 | 785.70 | 0.69 |
| 4 | β-Pinene | 7.247 | 855.70 | 6.46 |
| 5 | Myrcene | 7.726 | 884.38 | 2.67 |
| 6 | α-Phellandrene | 8.21 | 911.61 | 0.47 |
| 7 | Limonene | 9.463 | 975.26 | 51.41 |
| 8 | trans-β-Ocimene | 9.652 | 984.13 | 0.30 |
| 9 | cis-β-Ocimene | 10.054 | 1002.41 | 0.84 |
| 10 | γ-Terpinene | 10.582 | 1025.35 | 4.60 |
| 11 | Linalool | 12.296 | 1092.63 | 3.16 |
| 12 | Fenchyl alcohol | 12.832 | 1111.75 | 0.49 |
| 13 | cis-Sabinene hydrate | 13.192 | 1124.15 | 0.09 |
| 14 | β-Ocimene | 13.765 | 1143.20 | 0.10 |
| 15 | β-Terpineol | 14.231 | 1158.12 | 0.20 |
| 16 | α-Phellandren-8-ol | 15.276 | 1189.88 | 0.49 |
| 17 | α-Terpineol | 16.468 | 1223.55 | 4.13 |
| 18 | Neral | 18.07 | 1265.15 | 3.71 |
| 19 | Nerol | 18.07 | 1265.15 | 0.36 |
| 20 | cis-Citral | 18.619 | 1278.56 | 1.27 |
| 21 | Geraniol | 19.284 | 1294.29 | 0.41 |
| 22 | Geranial | 19.979 | 1310.16 | 2.11 |
| 23 | δ-Elemene | 22.755 | 1368.46 | 0.21 |
| 24 | Neryl acetate | 24.038 | 1393.04 | 2.53 |
| 25 | β-Elemene | 25.095 | 1412.33 | 0.20 |
| 26 | trans-Caryophyllene | 26.193 | 1431.52 | 1.06 |
| 27 | cis-α-Bergamotene | 26.932 | 1443.99 | 1.97 |
| 28 | Selina-4,11-diene | 28.518 | 1469.63 | 0.10 |
| 29 | Germacrene D | 28.723 | 1472.84 | 0.20 |
| 30 | β-Caryophyllene | 28.911 | 1475.76 | 0.14 |
| 31 | β-Cadinene | 29.165 | 1479.68 | 0.11 |
| 32 | α-Selinene | 29.295 | 1481.68 | 0.10 |
| 33 | β-Bisabolene | 29.599 | 1486.17 | 4.03 |
| Total | 99.98 | |||
| Coefficient | Value (*) for RC | ptest for RC | Value (*) for GC | ptest for GC |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| b0 | 2.6061 | 0.46 | 2.6115 | 0.45 |
| bC | 0.7758 | 0.31 | 0.7792 | 0.32 |
| bT | 1.1737 | 0.21 | 1.1824 | 0.22 |
| bD | -0.5371 | 0.42 | -0.5338 | 0.41 |
| bM | -0.7360 | 0.32 | -0.7317 | 0.33 |
| bCT | 0.4575 | 0.47 | 0.4602 | 0.46 |
| bCD | -0.6963 | 0.34 | -0.6937 | 0.35 |
| bCM | -0.6565 | 0.36 | -0.6528 | 0.37 |
| bTD | -0.3779 | 0.53 | -0.3756 | 0.52 |
| bTM | -0.2586 | 0.64 | -0.2553 | 0.63 |
| bDM | 0.8952 | 0.27 | 0.8984 | 0.26 |
| bCTD | -0.3779 | 0.53 | -0.3754 | 0.54 |
| bCTM | -0.3382 | 0.56 | -0.3357 | 0.55 |
| bCDM | 0.7360 | 0.32 | 0.7385 | 0.33 |
| bTDM | 0.4177 | 0.50 | 0.4203 | 0.51 |
| bCTDM | 0.2745 | - | 0.2783 | - |
| Clay Type | Temperature (°C) | Concentration (µl/cm³) | Particle Diameter (mm) | Clay Mass (g) | Desorption Rate (%) | Residual Mass (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Red Clay (RC) | 25 | 0.01 | 0.5 | 5 | 25 | 75 |
| Red Clay (RC) | 30 | 0.02 | 1.0 | 10 | 40 | 60 |
| Red Clay (RC) | 35 | 0.03 | 1.5 | 15 | 55 | 45 |
| Green Clay (GC) | 25 | 0.01 | 0.5 | 5 | 30 | 70 |
| Green Clay (GC) | 30 | 0.02 | 1.0 | 10 | 45 | 55 |
| Green Clay (GC) | 35 | 0.03 | 1.5 | 15 | 60 | 40 |
| Test | F (×10⁴) (g.h⁻¹.cm⁻¹) | Dz (×10⁶) (cm².h⁻¹) | K (×10³) | Ea (J.mol⁻¹) | M% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.2732 | 7.35 | 1.5 | -8.176 | 16.66 |
| 2 | 3.8197 | 1.47 | 0.3 | 20 | |
| 3 | 2.5464 | 3.43 | 0.7 | 20 | |
| 4 | 11.4591 | 2.45 | 0.5 | 30 | |
| 5 | 1.2732 | 9.31 | 1.9 | 20 | |
| 6 | 1.2732 | 2.94 | 0.6 | 30 | |
| 7 | 2.5464 | 3.92 | 0.8 | 23.33 | |
| 8 | 2.5464 | 1.96 | 0.4 | 33.33 | |
| 9 | 0.6366 | 15.68 | 0.8 | 20 | |
| 10 | 0.6366 | 5.88 | 0.3 | 16.66 | |
| 11 | 2.2281 | 43.12 | 2.2 | 23.33 | |
| 12 | 2.5464 | 17.64 | 0.9 | 23.33 | |
| 13 | 1.2732 | 25.48 | 1.3 | 20 | |
| 14 | 1.2732 | 9.8 | 0.5 | 30 | |
| 15 | 2.8647 | 39.2 | 2.0 | 30 | |
| 16 | 3.5014 | 21.56 | 1.1 | 30 |
| Test | F (×10⁴) (g.h⁻¹.cm⁻¹) | Dz (×10⁶) (cm².h⁻¹) | K (×10³) | Ea (J.mol⁻¹) | M% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.2732 | 8.12 | 1.6 | -7.854 | 17.50 |
| 2 | 3.8197 | 1.54 | 0.4 | 22 | |
| 3 | 2.5464 | 3.76 | 0.8 | 22 | |
| 4 | 11.4591 | 2.62 | 0.6 | 32 | |
| 5 | 1.2732 | 9.92 | 2.0 | 22 | |
| 6 | 1.2732 | 3.12 | 0.7 | 32 | |
| 7 | 2.5464 | 4.13 | 0.9 | 24.67 | |
| 8 | 2.5464 | 2.12 | 0.5 | 34.50 | |
| 9 | 0.6366 | 16.90 | 0.9 | 22 | |
| 10 | 0.6366 | 6.25 | 0.4 | 18.34 | |
| 11 | 2.2281 | 45.75 | 2.3 | 24.67 | |
| 12 | 2.5464 | 18.75 | 1.0 | 24.67 | |
| 13 | 1.2732 | 27.11 | 1.4 | 22 | |
| 14 | 1.2732 | 10.50 | 0.6 | 32 | |
| 15 | 2.8647 | 42.50 | 2.1 | 32 | |
| 16 | 3.5014 | 23.33 | 1.2 | 32 |
| F1 | F2 | F3 | F4 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eigenvalue | 1.89 | 1.38 | 0.53 | 0.18 |
| Variability (%) | 47.31 | 34.70 | 13.45 | 4.53 |
| Cumulative (%) | 47. 31 | 82.00 | 95.46 | 100 |
| Property | Value (eV) |
|---|---|
| Energy Gap (EGAP) | 14.62 |
| Chemical Hardness (η) | 7.31 |
| Electronegativity (χ) | 6.651 |
| Electrophilicity Index (ω) | 3.026 |
| Molecular Flexibility (S) | 0.068 |
| Proteins | Binding Affinity (kcal/mol) |
pKi | Ligand Efficiency (kcal/mol) |
Ligand– Protein Interactions |
Number of Conventional Hydrogen Bonds |
Number of Aromatic Bonds | Number of Van Der Waals Bonds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2NXX | -6.5 | 4.77 | 0.65 | Hydrophobic, Aromatic | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| 1C3Z | -6.3 | 4.62 | 0.63 | Hydrophobic, Aromatic | 0 | 2 | 3 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).