Submitted:
23 October 2024
Posted:
23 October 2024
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
3. Results
- W – the calculated total soil loss per year t ha-1;
- R – the rain erosive capacity factor;
- K – the soil susceptibility factor to the erosion processes, t ha-1;
- L – the slope length factor, m;
- S – the slope steepness factor, %;
- C – the vegetation and crop rotation factor;
- H – the soil conservation practice factor (dimensionless).
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Baliuk S. A., Nosko B. S., Zaryshniak A. S., Lisovyi M. V. (2015). Agrochemical service in the system of factors for preserving and improving soil fertility. Kharkiv: TOV Smuhasta typohrafiia [in Ukrainian].
- Bulyhin S. Yu., Achasov A. B., Achasova A. O. (2014) Land quality assessment and forecasting system (status, concept and algorithms). Kyiv: Ahrarna nauka [in Ukrainian].
- Bulyhyn S. Yu., Belolynskyi V. A. (2012). Soil and water optimisation of agricultural landscapes. Kyiv: Ahrarna nauka [in Russian].
- Velychko V. A. (2010). Ecology of soil fertility. Kyiv: Ahrarna nauka [in Ukrainian].
- Pichura V., I. (2016). Geomodelling of water-erosion processes in the Dnipro River basin. Ahroekolohichnyi zhurnal 4, 66-73 [in Ukrainian].
- Balabukh V. O. (2008) Variability of rains and downpours in Ukraine. Naukovi pratsi UkrNDHMI, 257, 61-72 [in Ukrainian].
- Bulyhin S. Yu. (2015) Land quality as a basis for land use control. Ahroekolohichnyi zhurnal 1, 26-46 [in Ukrainian]. Kyiv: Ahrarna nauka [in Ukrainian].
- Zubov A. O., Ilienko T. V., Bilokin O. A. Assessment of the environmental danger of natural dumps for agricultural land in agro-industrial landscapes. A. Kyiv: Ahrarna nauka [in Ukrainian].
- The concept of soil erosion protection in Ukraine. (2008). za red. S. A. Baliuka, L. L. Tovakhnianskoho Kharkiv: NNTs «Instytut hruntoznavstva i ahro- khimii [in Ukrainian].
- Krasovskyi H. Ya., Petrosov. V. A. (2003). Information technologies for space-based monitoring of aquatic ecosystems and forecasting urban water consumption. Kyiv: Naukova Dumka [in Ukrainian].
- Popov M. A., Stankevych S. A., Kozlova A. A. (2012) Remote land degradation risk assessment using space images and geospatial modelling. Dopovidi NAN Ukrainy, 6,100-104 [in Ukrainian].
- Weslati O., Serbaji, MM. (2024). Spatial assessment of soil erosion by water using RUSLE model, remote sensing and GIS: a case study of Mellegue Watershed, Algeria–Tunisia. Environ Monit Assess 196, 14. [CrossRef]
- Aiello A., Adamo M., & Canora F. (2015). Remote sensing and GIS to assess soil erosion with RUSLE3D and USPED at river basin scale in southern Italy. Catena, 131, 174–185 [in English]. [CrossRef]
- Allafta H., & Opp C. (2022). Soil erosion assessment using the RUSLE model, Remote Sensing, and GIS in the Shatt Al-Arab Basin (Iraq-Iran). Applied Sciences, 12(15), 7776. [CrossRef]
- Borrelli P., Robinson D.A., Fleischer L.R., Lugato E.; Ballabio C., Alewell C., Meusburger K., Modugno, S., Schütt, B., Ferro V. (2013) An assessment of the global impact of 21st century land use change on soil erosion. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8.
- El Jazouli, A.; Ghafiri, A.; El Moutaki, S.; Ettaqy, A.; Khellouk, R. (2017) Soil erosion modeled with USLE, GIS, and remote sensing: A case study of Ikkour watershed in Middle Atlas (Morocco). Geosci. Lett., 4, 25.
- Şenol C., & Taş M. A. (2023). Trends of changing land use dynamics in the Terkos Lake basin between 1980 and 2023 and their impact on natural ecosystems. Frontiers in Life Sciences and Related Technologies, 4(1), 20-31 [in English]. [CrossRef]
- Panagos P., Borrelli P., Meusburger C., Alewell C., Lugato E., Montanarella L. (2015). Estimating the soil erosion cover-management factor at European scale. Land Use policy journal. 48, 38-50.
- Lialko V. I., Yelistratova L. O., Apostolov O. A. (2018). Rapid assessment of erosion-prone areas of soil cover on the territory of Ukraine using remote sensing data with consideration of climatic factors and vegetation. Dopovidi NAN Ukrainy,3, 87-94 [in Ukrainian].
- Lialko V. I., Yelistratova L. O., Apostolov O. A., Chekhnii V. M. (2017). Analysis of soil-erosion processes in Ukraine based on the use of remote sensing data. Visnyk NAN Ukrainy, 10, 34-41 [in Ukrainian]. [CrossRef]
- Lialko V., Popov M., Stankevych S. (2014). Remote sensing polygons in Ukraine: current status and directions for further research and development. Ukrainian Metrological, 2, 15-26 [in Ukrainian].
- Lialko V.I., Yelistratova L.O., Apostolov O.A. (2018). Rapid assessment of erosion-prone areas of soil cover on the territory of Ukraine using remote sensing data with regard to climatic factors and vegetation. Dopovid Natsionalnoi akademii nauk Ukrainy 3, 87-94 [in Ukrainian]. [CrossRef]
- Kaminskyi V., Kolomiiets L., Bulgakov V., Olt J. (2021) An investigation into the state of agricultural lands under water erosion conditions. Agronomy Research. 19, 2, 458 – 471. [CrossRef]
- Rucins A., Kaminskyi V., Kolomiiets L., Bulgakov V., Jyri Olt, Kaminska V., Shevchenko I., Ihnatiev Y. (2024). Research into soil resource management technologies in context of aggravating exogenic processes. Journal of Ecological Engineering (JEE), 25(6), 128–143. [CrossRef]
- Zuazo, V.H.D., Pleguezuelo, C.R.R. (2009). Soil-Erosion and Runoff Prevention by Plant Covers: A Review. In: Lichtfouse, E., Navarrete, M., Debaeke, P., Véronique, S., Alberola, C. (eds) Sustainable Agriculture. Springer, Dordrecht. [CrossRef]
- Shuang Wu, Chao Zhang, Changxu Lv, Zhurong Xing. (2008) Study on Soil erosion Dynamic monitoring Based on “3S” technology. IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 208 (2018) 012088. [CrossRef]
- Wang, X.; Zhao, Z.; Han, X.; Liu, J.; Kitch, J.; Liu, Y.; Yang, H. (2022) Evaluating the Evolution of Soil Erosion under Catchment Farmland Abandonment Using Lakeshore Sediment. Sustainability 14, 12241. [CrossRef]
- Jothimani, M., Getahun, E., Abebe, A., Gunalan, J., Shano, L., Oyda, Y. (2024). Application of Geospatial Technologies and AHP Technique in the Identification of Soil Erosion-Prone Zones in the Rift Valley, Southern Ethiopia. In: Choudhury, T., Koley, B., Nath, A., Um, JS., Patidar, A.K. (eds) Geo-Environmental Hazards using AI-enabled Geospatial Techniques and Earth Observation Systems. Advances in Geographic Information Science. Springer, Cham. [CrossRef]
- Udayagee Kumarasinghe. (2021) A review on new technologies in soil erosion management. Journal of research technology and engineering, Vol 2(1). Available online: https://jrte.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/A-review-on-new-technologies-in-soil-erosion-management.pdf.
- Dahanayake A.C., Webb J.A., Greet J., Brookes J.D. (2024) How do plants reduce erosion? An Eco Evidence assessment. Plant Ecology, 225. 593–604. [CrossRef]
- Mesfln, A. (1994). The Nile-source of regional cooperation or conflict. In Proceedings of the Eighth Iwra World Congress on Water Resources “Satisfying Future National and Global Water Demand”, Cairo, Egypt, 21–25 November 1994.
- Renard, K.G., Foster, G.R., Wessies, G.A., Porter, J.P. (1991). RUSLE-Revised universal soil loss equation. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 46, 30 – 33.
- Dutta, D. Dutta, D., Das, S., Kundu, A., Taj, A. (2015). Soil erosion risk assessment in Sanjal watershed, Jharkhand (India) using geo-informatics, RUSLE model and TRMM data. Modeling Earth Syst. Environ, 1, 37. Available online: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40808-015-0034-1.
- Terranova, O., Antronico, L., Coscarelli, R., Iaquinta, P. (2009). Soil erosion risk scenarios in the Mediterranean environment using RUSLE and GIS: An application model for Calabria (southern Italy). Geomorphology, 112, 228–245.
- Auerswald, K. (1992). Predicted and measured sediment loads of large watersheds in Bavaria. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Symposium on River Sedimentation, Karlsruhe, Germany, 6–10 April 1992; pp. 1031–1036.
- Auerswald, K. (2008). Water erosion. In: The Encyclopaedia of Soil Science, W. Chesworth (Ed.). Springer-Verlag, pp. 817–822.
- Aiello, A., Adamo, M. and Canora, F. (2015). Remote Sensing and GIS to Assess Soil Erosion with RUSLE3D and USPED at River Basin Scale in Southern Italy. Catena, 131, 174-158.
- England, N. (2011). Think BIG: How and why landscape-scale conservation benefits wildlife, people and the wider economy. Produced for the England Biodiversity Group, 44. Available online: http://publications.naturalengland.org.uk/publication/30047.
- Rural Development in the European Union: statistical and economic Information. Report 2013. Available online: http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/statistics/rural-development/2013/full-text_en.pdf.
- Panagosa, P., Borrellia, P., Meusburgerb, K., Alewellb, C., Lugatoa, E., Montanarella L. (2015). Estimating the soil erosion cover-management factor at the European scale. Land Use Policy, 48, 38–50. [CrossRef]
- Pasquale, B. Pasquale, B., Robinson D. A., Fleischer L.R. et al. (2017). An assessment of the global impact of 21st century land use change on soil erosion. Nature Communications, 1. Available online: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-017-02142-7.
- Senol, C., Tas, M.A. (2023). Trends of changing land use dynamics in the Terkos Lake basin between 1980 and 2023 and their impact on natural ecosystems. Frontiers in Life Sciences and Related Technologies, 4(1), 20-31. Available online: http://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/flsrt.










| Polygon number | Horizontal position of segments, m | Horizontal position of segments, m | Angle of inclination (steepness), αº | Slope length factor, m | Rain erosivity factor | Soil susceptibility factor to erosion processes, t ha-1 | Slope steepness factor, % | Vegetation and crop rotation factor | Factor of efficiency of anti-erosion measures | Calculated total soil loss per year, t ha-1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 149 | 6 | 2.306 | 149.12 | 9.5 | 2.0 | 4.024 | 0.17 | 1 | 2.38 |
| 2 | 112 | 8 | 4.086 | 112.29 | 9.5 | 2.0 | 7.125 | 0.17 | 1 | 4.19 |
| 3 | 123 | 8 | 3.721 | 123.26 | 9.5 | 2.0 | 6.490 | 0.17 | 1 | 3.88 |
| Polygon number | Type of soil | Method of using sloping lands | Number of years of grassing | Slope inclination, degrees | Contents | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| pH | Humus, % | N, mg kg-1 | P2O5, mg | K2O, mg | |||||
| 1. | Typical medium-eroded light loamy chernozem | Spontaneous restoration of the herbage (conservation) | 22 | 11–12 | 7.3 | 3.85 | 16.1 | 19.3 | 12.7 |
| 2. | Typical heavily eroded light loamy chernozem | Spontaneous restoration of the herbage (conservation) | 21 | 7–10 | 7.1 | 1.96 | 9.6 | 5.5 | 9.7 |
| 3. | Typical chernozem, medium and highly eroded, light loamy. | Spontaneous restoration of the herbage (conservation) | 23 | 8–9 | 7.3 | 2.13 | 7.8 | 8.5 | 15.7 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).