Submitted:
16 October 2024
Posted:
16 October 2024
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Literature Review
3. Research Method
4. Research Results
- Enhanced Emotional Connection: Students described feeling more connected to the learning material when ARG scenarios were involved. The game-like environment allowed for a deeper emotional connection, reducing feelings of anxiety commonly associated with AI-based learning tools (Petroni et al., 2020). One student noted, "I felt like I was part of the story, which made me care more about what I was learning." This emotional connection was particularly beneficial for students who had previously struggled with disengagement in purely AI-driven environments.
- Increased Engagement and Active Participation: ARG elements significantly increased students' participation in the learning activities. The immersive scenarios encouraged students to actively engage with the content, work collaboratively with peers, and solve problems in context. This interactive nature provided a more compelling learning environment compared to conventional AI instruction (Kinio et al., 2019; Hsu & Liang, 2017). Another participant shared, "The ARG challenges made me want to participate more because it felt like I was solving real problems, not just answering questions on a screen." This sense of purpose and relevance was a key factor in sustaining engagement throughout the course.
- Improved Control Beliefs: Students reported a stronger sense of control over their learning processes when ARG elements were present. They felt that the challenges presented in the ARG scenarios allowed them to make decisions, influencing outcomes, which enhanced their belief in their ability to succeed in the course (Villavicencio & Bernardo, 2016; Yang et al., 2022). For example, one student mentioned, "I felt like I had more control because my choices affected the game. It wasn't just following instructions; I had to think about my actions." This sense of agency was linked to increased motivation and a more positive attitude towards learning.
5. Conclusions and Discussion
References
- Al Mulhim, E. (2020). Enhancing student engagement through interactive learning tools. Journal of Educational Research, 49(3), 278-293.
- Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W. H. Freeman.
- Bekeš, P., & Galzina, N. (2023). Challenges in AI-driven instruction: Emotional detachment and engagement issues. Journal of Educational Technology, 45(2), 115-130.
- Birenbaum, M. (2023). The role of instructional knowledge in implementing chatbots for learning. Education and AI Journal, 19(2), 189-204.
- Brandmiller, L., Schnitzler, K., & Heine, P. (2023). Emotional well-being in AI learning environments. Educational Psychology Review, 36(1), 98-112.
- Chiang, T., Chang, C., & Chen, M. (2024). Cognitive engagement in AI-based learning. Journal of Learning Sciences, 29(4), 331-345.
- Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59-109.
- Gilliam, R., Silva, L., & Miller, T. (2017). Implementing ARG in classrooms: Effects on student motivation. Interactive Learning Environments, 25(6), 724-739.
- Han, X., Lee, Y., & Choi, W. (2023). Student concerns in AI-driven classrooms. Journal of Learning Innovation, 21(4), 411-425.
- Hou, H., Chang, Y., & Li, M. (2021). Alternate Reality Games in education: A systematic review. Educational Media International, 58(3), 203-219.
- Hsu, Y., & Liang, W. (2017). Collaborative learning through ARG. Journal of Educational Technology Development, 35(1), 50-68.
- Izacard, G., & Grave, E. (2021). Enhancing LLMs with retrieval mechanisms: Applications in education. AI Learning Journal, 15(2), 112-130.
- Kapoor, S., Kaur, R., & Kaur, M. (2023). AI-driven personalized learning pathways. Journal of Educational Innovation, 27(1), 45-62.
- Kinio, A., Mota, G., & Gomes, L. (2019). Game-based learning and ARG. Computers & Education, 132, 165-177.
- Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice Hall.
- Lan, H., & Chen, Z. (2024). Collaborative AI-human teaching in classrooms. Journal of AI Integration in Education, 11(3), 221-235.
- Lewis, P., Perez, E., & Lee, C. (2020). Retrieval-Augmented Generation: A novel approach for personalized content generation. AI in Education Journal, 12(3), 211-227.
- Liang, T., Lin, R., & Chen, J. (2021). Personalized content generation with RAG LLM. Educational AI Research, 18(4), 299-310.
- Pekrun, R. (2014). Emotions and learning. International Handbook of Emotions in Education, 120-142.
- Petroni, F., Rocktäschel, T., & Riedel, S. (2020). Interactive learning with RAG-enhanced chatbots. Journal of Learning and AI, 14(2), 175-188.
- Pineiro-Otero, T., & Costa-Sanchez, C. (2015). Immersive learning environments and ARG. Interactive Learning Environments, 23(4), 455-467.
- Schnitzler, K., Brandmiller, L., & Ziegler, J. (2021). Addressing social and emotional needs in AI learning. Journal of Digital Learning, 37(2), 123-138.
- Sujadi, M. (2020). Improving students’ belief in learning control. Journal of Educational Studies, 30(3), 210-225.
- Tack, A., & Piech, C. (2022). AI teachers vs. human instructors: A comparative study. Education and AI Review, 13(1), 50-66.
- Villavicencio, F., & Bernardo, A. (2016). Emotional engagement in education: Implications for learning outcomes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 28(5), 390-400.
- Wang, H., Zheng, P., & Chen, Y. (2024). Enhancing dialogue-based learning with generative AI. Journal of Learning Sciences, 30(1), 75-88.
- Whitton, N. (2018). Alternate reality games for developing student autonomy and agency. International Journal of Game-Based Learning, 8(4), 1-14.
- Yang, J., Chen, L., & Sun, H. (2022). Long-term effects of ARG-integrated AI instruction. Journal of Digital Learning Research, 33(3), 290-305.
- Yang, L., & Xu, M. (2017). Student control beliefs in digital environments. Journal of Educational Technology and Practice, 21(2), 121-138.
- Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. H. (2001). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives. Routledge.


Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).