Submitted:
30 September 2024
Posted:
01 October 2024
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Material Extrusion
2.1. Historical Background
2.2. Basic Working Principles of Material Extrusion AM Printers
3. Materials in Material Extrusion AM
3.1. Polymers
3.2. Development of Material Extrusion Printed Nanocomposites
3.3. Carbon Based Nanoparticles
3.4. Ceramic Based Nanoparticles
3.5. Metal Based Nanoparticles
3.6. Semiconductor Based Nanoparticles
| Type of Additive | Matrix Polymer | Additive (Nano-Filler) | Concentration (wt. %) | Effectiveness of Nanofiller/Remark | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carbon-based nanoparticles | ABS | MWCNT | 1, 3, 5, 7 and 10 | Tensile strength increases up to 58 MPa with 7 wt.% MWCNT. Ductile to brittle transition, mechanical properties, and electrical conductivity dramatically increased. | [85] |
| PLA | MWCNT and GNPs | 1.5, 3,4.5,6,9 and 12 | To improving the dielectric properties MWCNT are more suitable and GNPs filler favours in thermal conductivity. | [86] | |
| ABS | CNT/CB | 3 | Increase the mechanical properties including strength and elastic modulus as well as improved electrical conductivity. | [87] | |
| Linear low-density polyethylene(LLDPE) | GNPs | 5, 10, 15, 20 and 30 | Enhance the thermal conductivity and mechanical performance. | [88] | |
| TPU | CB | 12 | The CBPs conductive network disconnection mechanism and Tunnelling effects are beneficial to the sensing mechanism for printed composite. | [89] | |
| Ceramic based nanoparticles | PVDF | BaTiO3 | 9 | Increased piezoelectric responsiveness by three times using nanofiller. | [90] |
| PLA | Silica | 5,10 and 15 | Increase in silica concentration increases the tensile strength up to 121.03 MPa | [91] | |
| PA12 | ZrO2 and (β-TCP) | 15 wt.% ZrO2 and 30, 35 & 40 wt.% β-TCP | Tensile modulus, impact strength and biological properties improved. | [92] | |
| PA12 | Zirconia and hydroxyl apatite |
10,15,20,30 and 40 | Filler improved strength and stiffness of PA 12 and lower the melting temperature and improved the thermal stability. | [68] | |
| PP | TCP | 20.5 | Controlled porosity PP-TCP composite exhibited high mechanical properties with pore size 160 µm. | [71] | |
| Metal based nanoparticles | PLA | Al | 6.95 | Enhance the dynamic mechanical thermal (DMT) property, elongation-at-break increases and reduced tensile strength and young’s modulus. | [93] |
| PLA | Ag | 0.01, 0.1, 2.5 and 5 | Adding Ag NPs exhibited antimicrobial activity against Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa | [94] | |
| PA12 | WC | 12.5,25,37.5 and 50 | Improved mechanical properties and increase glass transition temperature. | [95] | |
| PA6 &ABS | Al | 50 | Improvised the mechanical properties | [75] | |
| PA6 &ABS | Fe | 10,20,30,40 and50 | Enhance the mechanical and metallurgical properties. | [77] | |
| Semiconductor based nanoparticles | ABS | ZnO | 50 | Acts as a photocatalyst and removed contaminants in water. | [96] |
| PLA | Cu | 80 | Increased electrical resistivity and showed many defects recombination. | [84] | |
| Poly styrene |
TiO2 | 20 and 40 | 100% recyclable and promising photocatalytic activity | [97] | |
| PLA | CuO | 80 | Provided active porous sites for better room temperature ammonia gas sensing and adsorption. | [82] | |
| PVDF | ZnO | 1 and 2 | Thermally stable and excellently tunes the magnetic, photoluminescence, optical, piezoelectricity properties. | [98] |
4. Application of Material Extrusion Printed Polymer Based Nanocomposites
4.1. Wastewater Treatment
4.2. Biomedical Applications
4.3. Electronic Applications
4.4. Aerospace Application
4.5. Textile and Fashion Industry Application
5. Challenges and Future Perspectives
Consent to Participate
Consent for Publication
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
| Abbreviations. | Meaning | Abbreviations | Meaning |
| ABS | Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene | PBT | Polybutylene Terephthalate |
| ASA | Acrylonitrile Styrene Acrylate | PC | Polycarbonate |
| AM | Additive Manufacture | PCA | 1-Pyrene Carboxylic Acid |
| CB | Carbon Black | PCC | Polymer Ceramic Composites |
| Cfrtpcs | Continuous Fiber Reinforced Thermoplastic Composites | PCL | Polycaprolactone |
| CNT | Carbon Nanotube | PEEK | Polyether Ether Ketone |
| Cnfs | Cellulose Nanofibers | PEKK | Polyetherketoneketone |
| 3D | Three-Dimension | PET | Polyethylene Terephthalate |
| EC | Ethyl Cellulose | PETG | Polyethylene Terephthalate Glycol-Modified |
| EMI | Electromagnetic Interference | PHB | Poly-Hydroxybutyrate |
| FDM | Fused Deposition Modelling | PLA | Polylactic Acid |
| FRC | Fiber-Reinforced Composites | PLLA | Poly (L-Lactide) |
| Gnps | Graphinenanoplates | PMC | Polymer Matrix Composites |
| GO | Graphene Oxide | PP | Polypropylene |
| HIPS | High Impact Polystyrene | PS | Polystyrene |
| L-Arg | L-Arginine | PTFE | Polytetrafluoroethylene |
| Nps | Nanoparticles | PVDF | Poly Vinylidene Fluoride |
| MB | Methylene Blue | SLA | Stereolithography |
| MO | Methyl Orange | TCP | Tricalcium Phosphate |
| MTT | MerchantingTrade Transactions | TPE | Thermoplastic Elastomers |
| MUC1 | Mucin 1 | TPU | Thermoplastic Polyurethane |
| MWCNT | Multiwall Carbon Nanotube | ULTEM | Polyetherimide |
| PA$PAA | Polyamide$Polyacrylic Acid | WC | Tungsten Carbide |
References
- Ahmad, N.; Anae, J.; Khan, M.Z.; Sabir, S.; Yang, X.J.; Thakur, V.K.; Campo, P.; Coulon, F. Visible light-conducting polymer nanocomposites as efficient photocatalysts for the treatment of organic pollutants in wastewater. J. Environ. Manag. 2021, 295, 113362. [CrossRef]
- Clarissa, W.H.-Y.; Chia, C.H.; Zakaria, S.; Evyan, Y.C.-Y. Recent advancement in 3-D printing: nanocomposites with added functionality. Prog. Addit. Manuf. 2021, 7, 325–350. [CrossRef]
- Utela, B.; Storti, D.; Anderson, R.; Ganter, M. A review of process development steps for new material systems in three dimensional printing (3DP). J. Manuf. Process. 2008, 10, 96–104. [CrossRef]
- Nouri, A.; Shirvan, A.R.; Li, Y.; Wen, C. Additive manufacturing of metallic and polymeric load-bearing biomaterials using laser powder bed fusion: A review. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2021, 94, 196–215. [CrossRef]
- Jones, Jr., W.E.; Chiguma, J.; Johnson, E.; Pachamuthu, A.; Santos, D. Electrically and Thermally Conducting Nanocomposites for Electronic Applications. Materials 2010, 3, 1478–1496. [CrossRef]
- Boland, C.S.; Khan, U.; Ryan, G.; Barwich, S.; Charifou, R.; Harvey, A.; Backes, C.; Li, Z.; Ferreira, M.S.; Möbius, M.E.; et al. Sensitive electromechanical sensors using viscoelastic graphene-polymer nanocomposites. Science 2016, 354, 1257–1260. [CrossRef]
- Leigh, S.J.; Purssell, C.P.; Bowen, J.; Hutchins, D.A.; Covington, J.A.; Billson, D.R. A miniature flow sensor fabricated by micro-stereolithography employing a magnetite/acrylic nanocomposite resin. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 2011, 168, 66–71. [CrossRef]
- Gu, R.; Kokta, B.V.; Michalkova, D.; Dimzoski, B.; Fortelny, I.; Slouf, M.; Krulis, Z. Characteristics of wood-plastic composites reinforced with organo-nanoclays. J. Reinf. Plast. Compos. 2010, 29, 3566–3586. [CrossRef]
- Al-Saleh, M.H.; Gelves, G.A.; Sundararaj, U. Copper nanowire/polystyrene nanocomposites: Lower percolation threshold and higher EMI shielding. Compos. Part A: Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2011, 42, 92–97. [CrossRef]
- Khan, S.B.; Chen, S.; Sun, X. Advancements in polymer nanocomposite manufacturing: revolutionizing medical breakthroughs via additive manufacturing. Polym. Bull. 2024, 81, 9465–9517. [CrossRef]
- Wang, X.; Jiang, M.; Zhou, Z.W.; Gou, J.H.; Hui, D. 3D printing of polymer matrix composites: A review and prospective. Compos. Part B Eng. 2017, 110, 442–458. [CrossRef]
- Gu, D.; Shi, X.; Poprawe, R.; Bourell, D.L.; Setchi, R.; Zhu, J. Material-structure-performance integrated laser-metal additive manufacturing. Science 2021, 372, 932–+. [CrossRef]
- Kechagias, J.; Chaidas, D.; Vidakis, N.; Salonitis, K.; Vaxevanidis, N. Key parameters controlling surface quality and dimensional accuracy: a critical review of FFF process. Mater. Manuf. Process. 2022, 37, 963–984. [CrossRef]
- Tan, L.J.; Zhu, W.; Zhou, K. Recent Progress on Polymer Materials for Additive Manufacturing. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2020, 30, 2003062. [CrossRef]
- T.N. Tran, I.S. Bayer, J.A. Heredia-Guerrero, M. Frugone, M. Lagomarsino, F. Maggio, A. Athanassiou, Cocoa shell waste biofilaments for 3D printing applications, Macromolecular Materials and Engineering 302(11) (2017) 1700219.
- Germain, L.; Fuentes, C.A.; van Vuure, A.W.; des Rieux, A.; Dupont-Gillain, C. 3D-printed biodegradable gyroid scaffolds for tissue engineering applications. Mater. Des. 2018, 151, 113–122. [CrossRef]
- B. Green, R. McLeod, A. Guymon, Improving anisotropic properties of objects printed via stereolithography, ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, AMER CHEMICAL SOC 1155 16TH ST, NW, WASHINGTON, DC 20036 USA, 2018.
- Altıparmak, S.C.; Yardley, V.A.; Shi, Z.; Lin, J. Extrusion-based additive manufacturing technologies: State of the art and future perspectives. J. Manuf. Process. 2022, 83, 607–636. [CrossRef]
- C.N.C.C. da Costa, Process Parameter Optimization of FFF 3D Printed Parts, Instituto Politecnico de Leiria (Portugal), 2022.
- Iftekar, S.F.; Aabid, A.; Amir, A.; Baig, M. Advancements and Limitations in 3D Printing Materials and Technologies: A Critical Review. Polymers 2023, 15, 2519. [CrossRef]
- S. Dawson, C. Wheeler, A. Coonce, L. Cox, R. Radharamnan, Rapid Prototyping: Design of a Recycling System for the Cupcake 3D Printer, Journal of Management & Engineering Integration 5(2) (2012) 71.
- Kwak, K.; Kim, W.; Park, K. Complementary multiplatforms in the growing innovation ecosystem: Evidence from 3D printing technology. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2018, 136, 192–207. [CrossRef]
- R. Viseur, N. Jullien, 3D printer builders’ Open-hardware strategies, Proceedings of the 18th International Symposium on Open Collaboration, 2022, pp. 1-8.
- Pokorný, P.; Sobrino, D.R.D.; Václav, .; Petru, J.; Gołębski, R. Research into Specific Mechanical Properties of Composites Produced by 3D-Printing Additive Continuous-Fiber Fabrication Technology. Materials 2023, 16, 1459. [CrossRef]
- Rahim, T.N.A.T.; Abdullah, A.M.; Akil, H.M. Recent Developments in Fused Deposition Modeling-Based 3D Printing of Polymers and Their Composites. Polym. Rev. 2019, 59, 589–624. [CrossRef]
- Z. Li, A.S. Rathore, C. Song, S. Wei, Y. Wang, W. Xu, PrinTracker: Fingerprinting 3D printers using commodity scanners, Proceedings of the 2018 ACM sigsac conference on computer and communications security, 2018, pp. 1306-1323.
- Mohan, S.R.; Khaderi, S.N.; Simhambhatla, S. 3D Printing of Components with Tailored Properties Through Hilbert Curve Filling of a Discretized Domain. 3D Print. Addit. Manuf. 2020, 7, 288–299. [CrossRef]
- Dudek, P. FDM 3D Printing Technology in Manufacturing Composite Elements. Arch. Met. Mater. 2013, 58, 1415–1418. [CrossRef]
- Wang, F.; Wang, W.; Dong, J.; Feng, T. A Novel Discrete Fruit Fly Optimization Algorithm for Intelligent Parallel Test sheets Generation. MATEC Web Conf. 2015, 22, 01040. [CrossRef]
- K. Rajan, M. Samykano, K. Kadirgama, W.S.W. Harun, M.M. Rahman, Fused deposition modeling: process, materials, parameters, properties, and applications, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 120(3) (2022) 1531-1570.
- Fico, D.; Rizzo, D.; Casciaro, R.; Corcione, C.E. A Review of Polymer-Based Materials for Fused Filament Fabrication (FFF): Focus on Sustainability and Recycled Materials. Polymers 2022, 14, 465. [CrossRef]
- Cano-Vicent, A.; Tambuwala, M.M.; Hassan, S.S.; Barh, D.; Aljabali, A.A.; Birkett, M.; Arjunan, A.; Serrano-Aroca, . Fused deposition modelling: Current status, methodology, applications and future prospects. Addit. Manuf. 2021, 47. [CrossRef]
- Anwajler, B.; Zdybel, E.; Tomaszewska-Ciosk, E. Innovative Polymer Composites with Natural Fillers Produced by Additive Manufacturing (3D Printing)—A Literature Review. Polymers 2023, 15, 3534. [CrossRef]
- Parandoush, P.; Lin, D. A review on additive manufacturing of polymer-fiber composites. Compos. Struct. 2017, 182, 36–53. [CrossRef]
- Singamneni, S.; Behera, M.P.; Truong, D.; Le Guen, M.J.; Macrae, E.; Pickering, K. Direct extrusion 3D printing for a softer PLA-based bio-polymer composite in pellet form. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2021, 15, 936–949. [CrossRef]
- Gupta, A.K.; Taufik, M. Effect of process variables on performances measured in filament and pellet based extrusion process. Mater. Today: Proc. 2021, 47, 5177–5184. [CrossRef]
- Pagés-Llobet, A.; Espinach, F.X.; Julián, F.; Oliver-Ortega, H.; Méndez, J.A. Effect of Extruder Type in the Interface of PLA Layers in FDM Printers: Filament Extruder Versus Direct Pellet Extruder. Polymers 2023, 15, 2019. [CrossRef]
- Boyle, B.M.; Xiong, P.T.; Mensch, T.E.; Werder, T.J.; Miyake, G.M. 3D printing using powder melt extrusion. Addit. Manuf. 2019, 29, 100811. [CrossRef]
- Patel, A.; Taufik, M. Extrusion-Based Technology in Additive Manufacturing: A Comprehensive Review. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 2022, 49, 1309–1342. [CrossRef]
- A. Salem Bala, S. bin Wahab, Elements and materials improve the FDM products: A review, Advanced Engineering Forum, Trans Tech Publ, 2016, pp. 33-51.
- Grigore, M.E. Methods of Recycling, Properties and Applications of Recycled Thermoplastic Polymers. Recycling 2017, 2, 24. [CrossRef]
- Mohan, N.; Senthil, P.; Vinodh, S.; Jayanth, N. A review on composite materials and process parameters optimisation for the fused deposition modelling process. Virtual Phys. Prototyp. 2017, 12, 47–59. [CrossRef]
- Rezaei, A.; Izadi, R.; Fantuzzi, N. A Hierarchical Nano to Micro Scale Modelling of 3D Printed Nano-Reinforced Polylactic Acid: Micropolar Modelling and Molecular Dynamics Simulation. Nanomaterials 2024, 14, 1113. [CrossRef]
- Matias, M.L.; Pereira, C.; Almeida, H.V.; Jana, S.; Panigrahi, S.; Menda, U.D.; Nunes, D.; Fortunato, E.; Martins, R.; Nandy, S. 3D printed MXene architectures for a plethora of smart applications. Mater. Today Adv. 2024, 23. [CrossRef]
- A. Bhatia, A.K. Sehgal, Additive manufacturing materials, methods and applications: A review, Materials Today: Proceedings 81 (2023) 1060-1067.
- Puppi, D.; Chiellini, F. Biodegradable Polymers for Biomedical Additive Manufacturing. Appl. Mater. Today 2020, 20, 100700. [CrossRef]
- Haryńska, A.; Carayon, I.; Kosmela, P.; Szeliski, K.; Łapiński, M.; Pokrywczyńska, M.; Kucińska-Lipka, J.; Janik, H. A comprehensive evaluation of flexible FDM/FFF 3D printing filament as a potential material in medical application. Eur. Polym. J. 2020, 138, 109958. [CrossRef]
- Pal, A.K.; Mohanty, A.K.; Misra, M. Additive manufacturing technology of polymeric materials for customized products: recent developments and future prospective. RSC Adv. 2021, 11, 36398–36438. [CrossRef]
- A.J. Teo, A. Mishra, I. Park, Y.-J. Kim, W.-T. Park, Y.-J. Yoon, Polymeric biomaterials for medical implants and devices, ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering 2(4) (2016) 454-472.
- Han, W.B.; Yang, S.M.; Rajaram, K.; Hwang, S. Materials and Fabrication Strategies for Biocompatible and Biodegradable Conductive Polymer Composites toward Bio-Integrated Electronic Systems. Adv. Sustain. Syst. 2021, 6, 2100075. [CrossRef]
- Oladele, I.O.; Omotosho, T.F.; Adediran, A.A. Polymer-Based Composites: An Indispensable Material for Present and Future Applications. Int. J. Polym. Sci. 2020, 2020, 1–12. [CrossRef]
- Shanmugam, V.; Babu, K.; Kannan, G.; Mensah, R.A.; Samantaray, S.K.; Das, O. The thermal properties of FDM printed polymeric materials: A review. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2024, 228. [CrossRef]
- Wickramasinghe, S.; Do, T.; Tran, P. FDM-Based 3D Printing of Polymer and Associated Composite: A Review on Mechanical Properties, Defects and Treatments. Polymers 2020, 12, 1529. [CrossRef]
- Diniță, A.; Neacșa, A.; Portoacă, A.I.; Tănase, M.; Ilinca, C.N.; Ramadan, I.N. Additive Manufacturing Post-Processing Treatments, a Review with Emphasis on Mechanical Characteristics. Materials 2023, 16, 4610. [CrossRef]
- Zou, R.; Xia, Y.; Liu, S.; Hu, P.; Hou, W.; Hu, Q.; Shan, C. Isotropic and anisotropic elasticity and yielding of 3D printed material. Compos. Part B: Eng. 2016, 99, 506–513. [CrossRef]
- Acierno, D.; Patti, A. Fused Deposition Modelling (FDM) of Thermoplastic-Based Filaments: Process and Rheological Properties—An Overview. Materials 2023, 16, 7664. [CrossRef]
- Patti, A. Challenges to Improve Extrusion-Based Additive Manufacturing Process of Thermoplastics toward Sustainable Development. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2024, 45, 2400249. [CrossRef]
- A.M. Kumar, Polymer Nanocomposite Coatings, Advances in Corrosion Control of Magnesium and its Alloys, CRC Press2024, pp. 339-354.
- Clarissa, W.H.-Y.; Chia, C.H.; Zakaria, S.; Evyan, Y.C.-Y. Recent advancement in 3-D printing: nanocomposites with added functionality. Prog. Addit. Manuf. 2021, 7, 325–350. [CrossRef]
- Y. Liu, Y. Ren, S. You, Electrified carbon nanotube membrane technology for water treatment, Electrochemical Membrane Technology for Water and Wastewater Treatment, Elsevier2022, pp. 111-140.
- Zhai, Y.; Zhu, Z.; Dong, S. Carbon-Based Nanostructures for Advanced Catalysis. ChemCatChem 2015, 7, 2806–2815. [CrossRef]
- Shi, S.; Peng, Z.; Jing, J.; Yang, L.; Chen, Y. 3D Printing of Delicately Controllable Cellular Nanocomposites Based on Polylactic Acid Incorporating Graphene/Carbon Nanotube Hybrids for Efficient Electromagnetic Interference Shielding. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2020, 8, 7962–7972. [CrossRef]
- Xiang, D.; Zhang, X.; Li, Y.; Harkin-Jones, E.; Zheng, Y.; Wang, L.; Zhao, C.; Wang, P. Enhanced performance of 3D printed highly elastic strain sensors of carbon nanotube/thermoplastic polyurethane nanocomposites via non-covalent interactions. Compos. Part B: Eng. 2019, 176. [CrossRef]
- Contreras-Naranjo, J.E.; Perez-Gonzalez, V.H.; Mata-Gómez, M.A.; Aguilar, O. 3D-printed hybrid-carbon-based electrodes for electroanalytical sensing applications. Electrochem. Commun. 2021, 130, 107098. [CrossRef]
- Gnanasekaran, K.; Heijmans, T.; van Bennekom, S.; Woldhuis, H.; Wijnia, S.; de With, G.; Friedrich, H. 3D printing of CNT- and graphene-based conductive polymer nanocomposites by fused deposition modeling. Appl. Mater. Today 2017, 9, 21–28. [CrossRef]
- Thomas, S.C.; Sharma, H.; Mishra, P.K.; Talegaonkar, S. Ceramic Nanoparticles: Fabrication Methods and Applications in Drug Delivery. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2015, 21, 6165–6188. [CrossRef]
- Zhang, X.; Fan, W.; Liu, T. Fused deposition modeling 3D printing of polyamide-based composites and its applications. Compos. Commun. 2020, 21. [CrossRef]
- Rahim, T.N.A.T.; Abdullah, A.M.; Akil, H.M.; Mohamad, D.; Rajion, Z.A. The improvement of mechanical and thermal properties of polyamide 12 3D printed parts by fused deposition modelling. Express Polym. Lett. 2017, 11, 963–982. [CrossRef]
- H. Kim, J. Johnson, L.A. Chavez, C.A.G. Rosales, T.-L.B. Tseng, Y. Lin, Enhanced dielectric properties of three phase dielectric MWCNTs/BaTiO3/PVDF nanocomposites for energy storage using fused deposition modeling 3D printing, Ceramics International 44(8) (2018) 9037-9044.
- A.M. Abdullah, T.N.A.T. Rahim, D. Mohamad, H.M. Akil, Z.A. Rajion, Mechanical and physical properties of highly ZrO2/β-TCP filled polyamide 12 prepared via fused deposition modelling (FDM) 3D printer for potential craniofacial reconstruction application, Materials Letters 189 (2017) 307-309.
- Kalita, S.J.; Bose, S.; Hosick, H.L.; Bandyopadhyay, A. Development of controlled porosity polymer-ceramic composite scaffolds via fused deposition modeling. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2003, 23, 611–620. [CrossRef]
- R.J. Pinto, M.C. Neves, C.P. Neto, T. Trindade, Composites of cellulose and metal nanoparticles, Nanocomposites–New trends and developments (2012) 1-25.
- Yue, C.; Li, M.; Liu, Y.; Fang, Y.; Song, Y.; Xu, M.; Li, J. Three-dimensional printing of cellulose nanofibers reinforced PHB/PCL/Fe3O4 magneto-responsive shape memory polymer composites with excellent mechanical properties. Addit. Manuf. 2021, 46. [CrossRef]
- Masood, S.H.; Song, W.Q. Development of new metal/polymer materials for rapid tooling using Fused deposition modelling. Mater. Des. 2004, 25, 587–594. [CrossRef]
- R. Singh, R. Kumar, I. Ahuja, Mechanical, thermal and melt flow of aluminum-reinforced PA6/ABS blend feedstock filament for fused deposition modeling, Rapid Prototyping Journal (2018).
- Soundararajan, R.; Jayasuriya, N.; Vishnu, R.G.; Prassad, B.G.; Pradeep, C. Appraisal of Mechanical and Tribological Properties on PA6-TiO2 Composites through Fused Deposition Modelling. Mater. Today: Proc. 2019, 18, 2394–2402. [CrossRef]
- Kumar, R.; Singh, R.; Ahuja, I.; Amendola, A.; Penna, R. Friction welding for the manufacturing of PA6 and ABS structures reinforced with Fe particles. Compos. Part B: Eng. 2018, 132, 244–257. [CrossRef]
- Muwaffak, Z.; Goyanes, A.; Clark, V.; Basit, A.W.; Hilton, S.T.; Gaisford, S. Patient-specific 3D scanned and 3D printed antimicrobial polycaprolactone wound dressings. Int. J. Pharm. 2017, 527, 161–170. [CrossRef]
- M.K. Sahu, Semiconductor nanoparticles theory and applications, Int. J. Appl. Eng. Res 14(2) (2019) 491-494.
- Subannajui, K. Super-fast synthesis of ZnO nanowires by microwave air-plasma. Chem. Commun. 2016, 52, 3195–3198. [CrossRef]
- Viskadourakis, Z.; Sevastaki, M.; Kenanakis, G. 3D structured nanocomposites by FDM process: a novel approach for large-scale photocatalytic applications. Appl. Phys. A 2018, 124, 585. [CrossRef]
- Chaloeipote, G.; Prathumwan, R.; Subannajui, K.; Wisitsoraat, A.; Wongchoosuk, C. 3D printed CuO semiconducting gas sensor for ammonia detection at room temperature. Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process. 2020, 123, 105546. [CrossRef]
- Sangiorgi, A.; Gonzalez, Z.; Ferrandez-Montero, A.; Yus, J.; Sanchez-Herencia, A.J.; Galassi, C.; Sanson, A.; Ferrari, B. 3D Printing of Photocatalytic Filters Using a Biopolymer to Immobilize TiO2Nanoparticles. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2019, 166, H3239–H3248. [CrossRef]
- Salea, A.; Prathumwan, R.; Junpha, J.; Subannajui, K. Metal oxide semiconductor 3D printing: preparation of copper(ii) oxide by fused deposition modelling for multi-functional semiconducting applications. J. Mater. Chem. C 2017, 5, 4614–4620. [CrossRef]
- Sezer, H.K.; Eren, O. FDM 3D printing of MWCNT re-inforced ABS nano-composite parts with enhanced mechanical and electrical properties. J. Manuf. Process. 2018, 37, 339–347. [CrossRef]
- Spinelli, G.; Kotsilkova, R.; Ivanov, E.; Georgiev, V.; Ivanova, R.; Naddeo, C.; Romano, V. Dielectric Spectroscopy and Thermal Properties of Poly(lactic) Acid Reinforced with Carbon-Based Particles: Experimental Study and Design Theory. Polymers 2020, 12, 2414. [CrossRef]
- Schmitz, D.; Ecco, L.; Dul, S.; Pereira, E.; Soares, B.; Barra, G.; Pegoretti, A. Electromagnetic interference shielding effectiveness of ABS carbon-based composites manufactured via fused deposition modelling. Mater. Today Commun. 2018, 15, 70–80. [CrossRef]
- Jing, J.; Chen, Y.; Shi, S.; Yang, L.; Lambin, P. Facile and scalable fabrication of highly thermal conductive polyethylene/graphene nanocomposites by combining solid-state shear milling and FDM 3D-printing aligning methods. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 402, 126218. [CrossRef]
- Li, B.; Zhang, S.; Zhang, L.; Gao, Y.; Xuan, F. Strain sensing behavior of FDM 3D printed carbon black filled TPU with periodic configurations and flexible substrates. J. Manuf. Process. 2021, 74, 283–295. [CrossRef]
- H. Kim, T. Fernando, M. Li, Y. Lin, T.-L.B. Tseng, Fabrication and characterization of 3D printed BaTiO3/PVDF nanocomposites, Journal of Composite Materials 52(2) (2018) 197-206.
- Ahmed, W.; Siraj, S.; Al-Marzouqi, A.H. 3D Printing PLA Waste to Produce Ceramic Based Particulate Reinforced Composite Using Abundant Silica-Sand: Mechanical Properties Characterization. Polymers 2020, 12, 2579. [CrossRef]
- Abdullah, A.M.; Rahim, T.N.A.T.; Hamad, W.N.F.W.; Mohamad, D.; Akil, H.M.; Rajion, Z.A. Mechanical and cytotoxicity properties of hybrid ceramics filled polyamide 12 filament feedstock for craniofacial bone reconstruction via fused deposition modelling. Dent. Mater. 2018, 34, e309–e316. [CrossRef]
- Chen, L.; Zhang, X. Modification the surface quality and mechanical properties by laser polishing of Al/PLA part manufactured by fused deposition modeling. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2019, 492, 765–775. [CrossRef]
- Podstawczyk, D.; Skrzypczak, D.; Połomska, X.; Stargała, A.; Witek-Krowiak, A.; Guiseppi-Elie, A.; Galewski, Z. Preparation of antimicrobial 3D printing filament: In situ thermal formation of silver nanoparticles during the material extrusion. Polym. Compos. 2020, 41, 4692–4705. [CrossRef]
- Kumar, S.; Czekanski, A. Development of filaments using selective laser sintering waste powder. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 165, 1188–1196. [CrossRef]
- S. Son, P.-H. Jung, J. Park, D. Chae, D. Huh, M. Byun, S. Ju, H. Lee, Customizable 3D-printed architecture with ZnO-based hierarchical structures for enhanced photocatalytic performance, Nanoscale 10(46) (2018) 21696-21702.
- Sevastaki, M.; Suchea, M.P.; Kenanakis, G. 3D Printed Fully Recycled TiO2-Polystyrene Nanocomposite Photocatalysts for Use against Drug Residues. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 2144. [CrossRef]
- Kumar, R.; Singh, R.; Singh, M.; Kumar, P. On ZnO nano particle reinforced PVDF composite materials for 3D printing of biomedical sensors. J. Manuf. Process. 2020, 60, 268–282. [CrossRef]
- Rashid, M.; Ikram, M.; Haider, A.; Naz, S.; Haider, J.; Ul-Hamid, A.; Shahzadi, A.; Aqeel, M. Photocatalytic, dye degradation, and bactericidal behavior of Cu-doped ZnO nanorods and their molecular docking analysis. Dalton Trans. 2020, 49, 8314–8330. [CrossRef]
- Ainali, N.M.; Kalaronis, D.; Evgenidou, E.; Bikiaris, D.N.; Lambropoulou, D.A. Insights into Biodegradable Polymer-Supported Titanium Dioxide Photocatalysts for Environmental Remediation. Macromol 2021, 1, 201–233. [CrossRef]
- Kumbhakar, P.; Ambekar, R.S.; Mahapatra, P.L.; Tiwary, C.S. Quantifying instant water cleaning efficiency using zinc oxide decorated complex 3D printed porous architectures. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 418, 126383. [CrossRef]
- Mimérand, Y.d.R.d.; Li, K.; Guo, J. Photoactive Hybrid Materials with Fractal Designs Produced via 3D Printing and Plasma Grafting Technologies. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 24771–24781. [CrossRef]
- Jo, W.; Yoon, B.J.; Lee, H.; Moon, M.-W. 3D Printed Hierarchical Gyroid Structure with Embedded Photocatalyst TiO2Nanoparticles. 3D Print. Addit. Manuf. 2017, 4, 222–230. [CrossRef]
- Sevastaki, M.; Papadakis, V.M.; Romanitan, C.; Suchea, M.P.; Kenanakis, G. Photocatalytic Properties of Eco-Friendly ZnO Nanostructures on 3D-Printed Polylactic Acid Scaffolds. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 168. [CrossRef]
- Ventola, C.L. Medical Applications for 3D Printing: Current and Projected Uses. Pharm. Ther. 2014, 39, 704–711.
- Garcia-Gonzalez, D.; Garzon-Hernandez, S.; Arias, A. A new constitutive model for polymeric matrices: Application to biomedical materials. Compos. Part B: Eng. 2018, 139, 117–129. [CrossRef]
- Mandala, R.; Bannoth, A.P.; Akella, S.; Rangari, V.K.; Kodali, D. A short review on fused deposition modeling 3D printing of bio-based polymer nanocomposites. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2021, 139, 51904. [CrossRef]
- Chen, Q.; Mangadlao, J.D.; Wallat, J.; De Leon, A.; Pokorski, J.K.; Advincula, R.C. 3D Printing Biocompatible Polyurethane/Poly(lactic acid)/Graphene Oxide Nanocomposites: Anisotropic Properties. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 4015–4023. [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y.; Lei, M.; Wei, Q.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, J.; Guo, Y.; Saroia, J. 3D printing biocompatible l-Arg/GNPs/PLA nanocomposites with enhanced mechanical property and thermal stability. J. Mater. Sci. 2020, 55, 5064–5078. [CrossRef]
- Cao, T.; Ho, K.-H.; Teoh, S.-H. Scaffold Design andin VitroStudy of Osteochondral Coculture in a Three-Dimensional Porous Polycaprolactone Scaffold Fabricated by Fused Deposition Modeling. Tissue Eng. 2003, 9, 103–112. [CrossRef]
- Kempin, W.; Franz, C.; Koster, L.-C.; Schneider, F.; Bogdahn, M.; Weitschies, W.; Seidlitz, A. Assessment of different polymers and drug loads for fused deposition modeling of drug loaded implants. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 2017, 115, 84–93. [CrossRef]
- Sadia, M.; Arafat, B.; Ahmed, W.; Forbes, R.T.; Alhnan, M.A. Channelled tablets: An innovative approach to accelerating drug release from 3D printed tablets. J. Control. Release 2018, 269, 355–363. [CrossRef]
- A. Goyanes, A.B. Buanz, A.W. Basit, S. Gaisford, Fused-filament 3D printing (3DP) for fabrication of tablets, International journal of pharmaceutics 476(1-2) (2014) 88-92.
- Katseli, V.; Economou, A.; Kokkinos, C. Smartphone-Addressable 3D-Printed Electrochemical Ring for Nonenzymatic Self-Monitoring of Glucose in Human Sweat. Anal. Chem. 2021, 93, 3331–3336. [CrossRef]
- M.A. Ali, C. Hu, S. Jahan, B. Yuan, M.S. Saleh, E. Ju, S.J. Gao, R. Panat, Sensing of COVID-19 antibodies in seconds via aerosol jet nanoprinted reduced-graphene-oxide-coated 3D electrodes, Advanced Materials 33(7) (2021) 2006647.
- Marzo, A.M.L.; Mayorga-Martinez, C.C.; Pumera, M. 3D-printed graphene direct electron transfer enzyme biosensors. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2019, 151, 111980. [CrossRef]
- Crevillen, A.G.; Mayorga-Martinez, C.C.; Zelenka, J.; Rimpelová, S.; Ruml, T.; Pumera, M. 3D-printed transmembrane glycoprotein cancer biomarker aptasensor. Appl. Mater. Today 2021, 24, 101153. [CrossRef]
- Xu, Y.; Wu, X.; Guo, X.; Kong, B.; Zhang, M.; Qian, X.; Mi, S.; Sun, W. The Boom in 3D-Printed Sensor Technology. Sensors 2017, 17, 1166. [CrossRef]
- MacDonald, E.; Wicker, R. Multiprocess 3D printing for increasing component functionality. Science 2016, 353, aaf2093. [CrossRef]
- Carkaci, M.E.; Secmen, M. Design and prototype manufacturing of a feed system for Ku-band satellite communication by using 3D FDM/PLA printing and conductive paint technology. Int. J. RF Microw. Comput. Eng. 2019, 30. [CrossRef]
- Foster, C.W.; Down, M.P.; Zhang, Y.; Ji, X.; Rowley-Neale, S.J.; Smith, G.C.; Kelly, P.J.; Banks, C.E. 3D Printed Graphene Based Energy Storage Devices. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 42233. [CrossRef]
- Viskadourakis, Z.; Perrakis, G.; Symeou, E.; Giapintzakis, J.; Kenanakis, G. Transport properties of 3D printed polymer nanocomposites for potential thermoelectric applications. Appl. Phys. A 2019, 125, 159. [CrossRef]
- Zhang, D.; Chi, B.; Li, B.; Gao, Z.; Du, Y.; Guo, J.; Wei, J. Fabrication of highly conductive graphene flexible circuits by 3D printing. Synth. Met. 2016, 217, 79–86. [CrossRef]
- Madhavadas, V.; Srivastava, D.; Chadha, U.; Raj, S.A.; Sultan, M.T.H.; Shahar, F.S.; Shah, A.U.M. A review on metal additive manufacturing for intricately shaped aerospace components. CIRP J. Manuf. Sci. Technol. 2022, 39, 18–36. [CrossRef]
- Najmon, J.C.; Raeisi, S.; Tovar, A. Review of additive manufacturing technologies and applications in the aerospace industry. In Additive Manufacturing for the Aerospace Industry; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019; pp. 7–31.
- Zhao, H.; Liu, X.; Zhao, W.; Wang, G.; Liu, B. An Overview of Research on FDM 3D Printing Process of Continuous Fiber Reinforced Composites. J. Physics: Conf. Ser. 2019, 1213, 052037. [CrossRef]
- Ogbonna, V.E.; Popoola, A.P.I.; Popoola, O.M.; Adeosun, S.O. A review on the recent advances on improving the properties of epoxy nanocomposites for thermal, mechanical, and tribological applications: challenges and recommendations. Polym. Technol. Mater. 2021, 61, 176–195. [CrossRef]
- Shekar, R.I.; Kotresh, T.M.; Rao, P.M.D.; Kumar, K. Properties of high modulus PEEK yarns for aerospace applications. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2009, 112, 2497–2510. [CrossRef]
- Abdullah, F.; Okuyama, K.-I.; Morimitsu, A.; Yamagata, N. Effects of Thermal Cycle and Ultraviolet Radiation on 3D Printed Carbon Fiber/Polyether Ether Ketone Ablator. Aerospace 2020, 7, 95. [CrossRef]
- Rinaldi, M.; Cecchini, F.; Pigliaru, L.; Ghidini, T.; Lumaca, F.; Nanni, F. Additive Manufacturing of Polyether Ether Ketone (PEEK) for Space Applications: A Nanosat Polymeric Structure. Polymers 2020, 13, 11. [CrossRef]
- Woosley, S.; Galehdari, N.A.; Kelkar, A.; Aravamudhan, S. Fused deposition modeling 3D printing of boron nitride composites for neutron radiation shielding. J. Mater. Res. 2018, 33, 3657–3664. [CrossRef]
- Tian, X.; Liu, T.; Yang, C.; Wang, Q.; Li, D. Interface and performance of 3D printed continuous carbon fiber reinforced PLA composites. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2016, 88, 198–205. [CrossRef]
- Kim, S.; Seong, H.; Her, Y.; Chun, J. A study of the development and improvement of fashion products using a FDM type 3D printer. Fash. Text. 2019, 6, 9. [CrossRef]
- E. Piperi, L. Galantucci, J. Kaçani, I. Bodi, T. Spahiu, From 3D scanning to 3D printing: Application in fashion industry, 2016.
- Y. Martens, A. Ehrmann, Composites of 3D-printed polymers and textile fabrics, IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, IOP Publishing, 2017, p. 012292.
- Chakraborty, S.; Biswas, M.C. 3D printing technology of polymer-fiber composites in textile and fashion industry: A potential roadmap of concept to consumer. Compos. Struct. 2020, 248, 112562. [CrossRef]
- Sanatgar, R.H.; Campagne, C.; Nierstrasz, V. Investigation of the adhesion properties of direct 3D printing of polymers and nanocomposites on textiles: Effect of FDM printing process parameters. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2017, 403, 551–563. [CrossRef]
- Melnikova, R.; Ehrmann, A.; Finsterbusch, K. 3D printing of textile-based structures by Fused Deposition Modelling (FDM) with different polymer materials. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering; IOP Publishing: Bristol, UK, 2014; Volume 62, p. 012018.
- Ali, A.; Soni, M.; Javaid, M.; Haleem, A. A Comparative Analysis of Different Rapid Prototyping Techniques for Making Intricately Shaped Structure. J. Ind. Integr. Manag. 2020, 5, 393–407. [CrossRef]
- T. Spahiu, E. Piperi, N. Grimmelsmann, A. Ehrmann, E. Shehi, 3D printing as a new technology for apparel designing and manufacturing, International Textile Conference, 2016.
- Goyanes, A.; Buanz, A.B.; Hatton, G.B.; Gaisford, S.; Basit, A.W. 3D printing of modified-release aminosalicylate (4-ASA and 5-ASA) tablets. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 2015, 89, 157–162. [CrossRef]
- K. Ilyés, N.K. Kovács, A. Balogh, E. Borbás, B. Farkas, T. Casian, G. Marosi, I. Tomuță, Z.K. Nagy, The applicability of pharmaceutical polymeric blends for the fused deposition modelling (FDM) 3D technique: Material considerations–printability–process modulation, with consecutive effects on in vitro release, stability and degradation, European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 129 (2019) 110-123.






Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).