Submitted:
12 September 2024
Posted:
13 September 2024
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Bio-Based Materials
3. Performance and Functional Properties of Polymers in Food Packaging

3.1. Cellulose
3.2. Chitosan
3.3. Starch
3.4. PLA (Polylactic Acid)
3.5. Pectin
3.6. Gum
3.7. Agar
3.8. PHB (Polyhydroxybutyrate)
3.9. Hybrid Composites
4. Comparison of Bio-Based and Conventional Materials in Packaging
| Material | CO₂-eq Emissions (kg/kg) | Energy Consumption (MJ/kg) | Water Consumption (liters/kg) | Biodegradation (years) | Source/ Renewability | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PET (Polyethylene terephthalate) | 2.15-3.0 | 109.2-115.2 | 5.9 | >100 | Non-renewable (petroleum) | [80,81,82] |
| PP (Polypropylene) | 1.75-2.3 | 73 | 59 | >100 | Non-renewable (petroleum) | [80,81,83] |
| PLA (Polylactic Acid) | 1.8 | 46 | 15-23 | 2-5 | Renewable | [82,84] |
| PHA (Polyhydroxyalkanoates) | 0.49 | 78-88 | 268 | 2-5 | Renewable | [85,86] |
| Bacterial Cellulose | 16.1 | 31.6 | 460 | 2-4 | Renewable | [87] |
| Thermoplastic Starch | 1.8-3.7 | 33-72 | 10 | 1-3 | Renewable | [88,89] |
| Chitosan | 1.64 | 31.0 | 250 | 2-4 | Renewable | [90] |
5. Intelligent Packaging Technologies
5.1. Active Packaging
5.2. Food Packaging with Sensors
5.3. Tracking and Identification Systems
6. Integration of Bio-Based Materials and Smart Packaging
7. Perspectives and Conclusions
Author Contributions
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Arfelli, F.; Roguszewska, M.; Torta, G.; Iurlo, M.; Cespi, D.; Ciacci, L.; Passarini, F. Environmental Impacts of Food Packaging: Is It All a Matter of Raw Materials? Sustain. Prod. Consum. 2024, 49, 318–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Acharyya, P.P.; Sarma, M.; Kashyap, A. Recent Advances in Synthesis and Bioengineering of Bacterial Nanocellulose Composite Films for Green, Active and Intelligent Food Packaging. Cellulose 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jambeck, J.R.; Geyer, R.; Wilcox, C.; Siegler, T.R.; Perryman, M.; Andrady, A.; Narayan, R.; Law, K.L. Plastic Waste Inputs from Land into the Ocean. Science (80-. ). 2015, 347, 768–771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bian, Z.; Li, X.; Zhang, J.; Shi, M.; Xin, Z.; Wang, H.; Komarneni, S.; Zhang, K.; Ni, Z.; Hu, G. Intelligent Double-Layer Films Based on Gellan Gum/Mica Nanosheets/Anthocyanin/Konjac Glucomannan/Carrageenan for Food Real-Time Freshness Monitoring. Food Hydrocoll. 2024, 151, 109767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zafar, M.Z.; Shi, X.; Yang, H.; Abbas, J.; Chen, J. The Impact of Interpretive Packaged Food Labels on Consumer Purchase Intention: The Comparative Analysis of Efficacy and Inefficiency of Food Labels. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 5098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Doğan, N. Native Bacterial Cellulose Films Based on Kombucha Pellicle as a Potential Active Food Packaging. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2023, 60, 2893–2904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yu, F.; Fei, X.; He, Y.; Li, H. Poly(Lactic Acid)-Based Composite Film Reinforced with Acetylated Cellulose Nanocrystals and ZnO Nanoparticles for Active Food Packaging. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 186, 770–779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abdelkader, R.M.M.; Hamed, D.A.; Gomaa, O.M. Red Cabbage Extract Immobilized in Bacterial Cellulose Film as an Eco-Friendly Sensor to Monitor Microbial Contamination and Gamma Irradiation of Stored Cucumbers. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2024, 40, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Palanisamy, S.; Selvaraju, G.D.; Selvakesavan, R.K.; Venkatachalam, S.; Bharathi, D.; Lee, J. Unlocking Sustainable Solutions: Nanocellulose Innovations for Enhancing the Shelf Life of Fruits and Vegetables – A Comprehensive Review. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 261, 129592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- D’Almeida, A.P.; de Albuquerque, T.L. Coconut Husk Valorization: Innovations in Bioproducts and Environmental Sustainability. Biomass Convers. Biorefinery 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abekoon, T.; Buthpitiya, B.L.S.K.; Sajindra, H.; Samarakoon, E.R.J.; Jayakody, J.A.D.C.A.; Kantamaneni, K.; Rathnayake, U. A Comprehensive Review to Evaluate the Synergy of Intelligent Food Packaging with Modern Food Technology and Artificial Intelligence Field. Discov. Sustain. 2024, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shi, J.; Sheng, L.; Chen, M.; Wu, X.; Li, X.; Tan, Y.Q. PH-Responsive Collagen Nanocomposite Films Reinforced by Curcumin-Loaded Laponite Nanoplatelets for Dynamic Visualization of Shrimp Freshness. Food Hydrocoll. 2024, 157, 110447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fan, L.; Chen, Y.; Zeng, Y.; Yu, Z.; Dong, Y.; Li, D.; Zhang, C.; Ye, C. Application of Visual Intelligent Labels in the Assessment of Meat Freshness. Food Chem. 2024, 460, 140562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cheng, M.; Yan, X.; Cui, Y.; Han, M.; Wang, X.; Wang, J.; Zhang, R. An Eco-Friendly Film of PH-Responsive Indicators for Smart Packaging. J. Food Eng. 2022, 321, 110943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mohammadian, E.; Alizadeh-Sani, M.; Jafari, S.M. Smart Monitoring of Gas/Temperature Changes within Food Packaging Based on Natural Colorants. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2020, 19, 2885–2931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Das, P.P.; Prathapan, R.; Ng, K.W. Advances in Biomaterials Based Food Packaging Systems: Current Status and the Way Forward. Biomater. Adv. 2024, 164, 213988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Miao, F.; Han, Y.; Tian, P.; Tao, B.; Zang, Y.; Chu, P.K. Integrated Sensor for Humidity, Temperature, Light, and Carbon Dioxide Based on Passive RFID. Sensors Actuators B Chem. 2023, 390, 133913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yong, Y.; Ahmad, H.N.; Gu, Y.; Zhu, X.; Wen, Y.; Guo, L.; Zhu, J. The Synergistic Effect of Polyphenols and Polypeptides for Plant-Based Bioplastic Film – Enhanced UV Resistance, Antioxidant and Antibacterial Performance. Food Chem. 2024, 460, 140746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Laranjeiro, F.; Rotander, A.; López-Ibáñez, S.; Vilas, A.; Södergren Seilitz, F.; Clérandeau, C.; Sampalo, M.; Rial, D.; Bellas, J.; Cachot, J.; et al. Comparative Assessment of the Acute Toxicity of Commercial Bio-Based Polymer Leachates on Marine Plankton. Sci. Total Environ. 2024, 946, 174403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Swielam, E.M.; Hussien, Z.M.; Hasanin, M.S. Design, Characterizations, and Antimicrobial Activity of Sustainable Home Furnishing-Based Waste Fabric Treated Using Biobased Nanocomposite. Bioresour. Bioprocess. 2024, 11, 75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Miao, W.; Gu, R.; Shi, X.; Zhang, J.; Yu, L.; Xiao, H.; Li, C. Indicative Bacterial Cellulose Films Incorporated with Curcumin-Embedded Pickering Emulsions: Preparation, Antibacterial Performance, and Mechanism. Chem. Eng. J. 2024, 495, 153284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lindh, A.; Wijayarathna, E.R.K.B.; Ciftci, G.C.; Syed, S.; Bashir, T.; Kadi, N.; Zamani, A. Dry Gel Spinning of Fungal Hydrogels for the Development of Renewable Yarns from Food Waste. Fungal Biol. Biotechnol. 2024, 11, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Weng, S.; Marcet, I.; Rendueles, M.; Díaz, M. Insect-Derived Materials for Food Packaging-A Review. Food Packag. Shelf Life 2023, 38, 101097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rosenboom, J.-G.; Langer, R.; Traverso, G. Bioplastics for a Circular Economy. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2022, 7, 117–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- de Albuquerque, T.L.; Marques Júnior, J.E.; de Queiroz, L.P.; Ricardo, A.D.S.; Rocha, M.V.P. Polylactic Acid Production from Biotechnological Routes: A Review. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 186, 933–951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Luo, Y.; Lin, Z.; Guo, G. Biodegradation Assessment of Poly (Lactic Acid) Filled with Functionalized Titania Nanoparticles (PLA/TiO2) under Compost Conditions. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2019, 14, 56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ramchuran, S.O.; O’Brien, F.; Dube, N.; Ramdas, V. An Overview of Green Processes and Technologies, Biobased Chemicals and Products for Industrial Applications. Curr. Opin. Green Sustain. Chem. 2023, 41, 100832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marting Vidaurre, N.A.; Vargas-Carpintero, R.; Wagner, M.; Lask, J.; Lewandowski, I. Social Aspects in the Assessment of Biobased Value Chains. Sustainability 2020, 12, 9843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moshood, T.; Nawanir, G.; Mahmud, F.; Mohamad, F.; Ahmad, M.; Abdul Ghani, A. Expanding Policy for Biodegradable Plastic Products and Market Dynamics of Bio-Based Plastics: Challenges and Opportunities. Sustainability 2021, 13, 6170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Song, X.; Tang, Z.; Liu, W.; Chen, K.; Liang, J.; Yuan, B.; Lin, H.; Zhu, X.; Fan, Y.; Shi, X.; et al. Biomaterials and Regulatory Science. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2022, 128, 221–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martín-Closas, L.; Costa, J.; Pelacho, A.M. Agronomic Effects of Biodegradable Films on Crop and Field Environment. In; 2017; pp. 67–104.
- Chiaregato, C.G.; Souza, C.F.; Faez, R. The Fertilizer Release into Water and Soil as the Biodegradation Process in the Sustainable Material Enhancing the Fertilizer Efficiency. Environ. Technol. Innov. 2021, 22, 101417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carvalho, D.; Ferreira, N.; França, B.; Marques, R.; Silva, M.; Silva, S.; Silva, E.; Macário, D.; Barroso, L.; Silva, C.J.; et al. Advancing Sustainability in the Automotive Industry: Bioprepregs and Fully Bio-Based Composites. Compos. Part C Open Access 2024, 14, 100459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khan, F.; Hossain, N.; Mim, J.J.; Rahman, S.M.; Iqbal, M.J.; Billah, M.; Chowdhury, M.A. Advances of Composite Materials in Automobile Applications – A Review. J. Eng. Res. 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Teixeira, S.C.; Gomes, N.O.; Oliveira, T.V. de; Fortes-Da-Silva, P.; Soares, N. de F.F.; Raymundo-Pereira, P.A. Review and Perspectives of Sustainable, Biodegradable, Eco-Friendly and Flexible Electronic Devices and (Bio)Sensors. Biosens. Bioelectron. X 2023, 14, 100371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Villarreal, C.C.; Monge, S.; Aguilar, D.; Tames, A.; Araya, N.; Aguilar, M.; Ramakrishna, S.; Thavasi, V.; Song, Z.; Mulchandani, A.; et al. Bio-Sensitized Solar Cells Built from Renewable Carbon Sources. Mater. Today Energy 2022, 23, 100910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dalwadi, S.; Goel, A.; Kapetanakis, C.; Salas-de la Cruz, D.; Hu, X. The Integration of Biopolymer-Based Materials for Energy Storage Applications: A Review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 3975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bell, J.; Paula, L.; Dodd, T.; Németh, S.; Nanou, C.; Mega, V.; Campos, P. EU Ambition to Build the World’s Leading Bioeconomy—Uncertain Times Demand Innovative and Sustainable Solutions. N. Biotechnol. 2018, 40, 25–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, R.; Feng, H.; Wang, S.; Zhuang, D.; Wen, Y.; Zhu, J. A Double-Layer Film Based on the Strategy of Tannic Acid-Anthocyanin Co-Pigmentation and Tannic-Crosslinked-Gelatin/−reduced Ag Nanoparticles for Beef Preservation and Monitoring. Food Chem. 2024, 460, 140642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Souza, E.; Gottschalk, L.; Freitas-Silva, O. Overview of Nanocellulose in Food Packaging. Recent Pat. Food. Nutr. Agric. 2019, 11, 154–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Han Lyn, F.; Ismail-Fitry, M.R.; Noranizan, M.A.; Tan, T.B.; Nur Hanani, Z.A. Recent Advances in Extruded Polylactic Acid-Based Composites for Food Packaging: A Review. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 266, 131340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, G.; Wang, K.; Chen, P.; Cai, D.; Shao, Y.; Xia, R.; Li, C.; Wang, H.; Ren, F.; Cheng, X.; et al. Fully Biodegradable Packaging Films for Fresh Food Storage Based on Oil-Infused Bacterial Cellulose. Adv. Sci. 2024, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Vikman, M.; Vartiainen, J.; Tsitko, I.; Korhonen, P. Biodegradability and Compostability of Nanofibrillar Cellulose-Based Products. J. Polym. Environ. 2015, 23, 206–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- In Kim, T.; Lee, S.J.; Chathuranga, K.; Lee, J.S.; Kim, M.H.; Park, W.H. Multifunctional and Edible Egg White/Amylose-Tannin Bilayer Film for Perishable Fruit Preservation. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 274, 133207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gao, X.; Cao, L.; Wang, L.; Liu, S.; Zhang, M.; Li, C.; Waterhouse, G.I.N.; Fan, H.; Xu, J. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules Alcohol ) Film : Efficient and Recyclable for Fruit Packaging. 2024, 268.
- Mavai, S.; Bains, A.; Sridhar, K.; Rashid, S.; Elossaily, G.M.; Ali, N.; Chawla, P.; Sharma, M. Formulation and Application of Poly Lactic Acid, Gum, and Cellulose-Based Ternary Bioplastic for Smart Food Packaging: A Review. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 268, 131687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Dórame-Miranda, R.F.; Gámez-Meza, N.; Medina-Juárez, L.; Ezquerra-Brauer, J.M.; Ovando-Martínez, M.; Lizardi-Mendoza, J. Bacterial Cellulose Production by Gluconacetobacter Entanii Using Pecan Nutshell as Carbon Source and Its Chemical Functionalization. Carbohydr. Polym. 2019, 207, 91–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gupta, D.; Lall, A.; Kumar, S.; Patil, T.D.; Gaikwad, K.K. Plant-Based Edible Films and Coatings for Food-Packaging Applications: Recent Advances, Applications, and Trends. Sustain. Food Technol. 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carniel, A.; Ferreira dos Santos, N.; Buarque, F.S.; Mendes Resende, J.V.; Ribeiro, B.D.; Marrucho, I.M.; Coelho, M.A.Z.; Castro, A.M. From Trash to Cash: Current Strategies for Bio-Upcycling of Recaptured Monomeric Building Blocks from Poly(Ethylene Terephthalate) (PET) Waste. Green Chem. 2024, 26, 5708–5743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pérez-Bassart, Z.; Reyes, A.; Martínez-Abad, A.; López-Rubio, A.; Fabra, M.J. Feasibility of Agaricus Bisporus Waste Biomass to Develop Biodegradable Food Packaging Materials. Food Hydrocoll. 2023, 142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moshood, T.D.; Nawanir, G.; Mahmud, F.; Mohamad, F.; Ahmad, M.H.; AbdulGhani, A. Sustainability of Biodegradable Plastics: New Problem or Solution to Solve the Global Plastic Pollution? Curr. Res. Green Sustain. Chem. 2022, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Babu, R.P.; O’Connor, K.; Seeram, R. Current Progress on Bio-Based Polymers and Their Future Trends. Prog. Biomater. 2013, 2, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Naser, A.Z.; Deiab, I.; Darras, B.M. Poly(Lactic Acid) (PLA) and Polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHAs), Green Alternatives to Petroleum-Based Plastics: A Review. RSC Adv. 2021, 11, 17151–17196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Koreshkov, M.; Takatsuna, Y.; Bismarck, A.; Fritz, I.; Reimhult, E.; Zirbs, R. Sustainable Food Packaging Using Modified Kombucha-Derived Bacterial Cellulose Nanofillers in Biodegradable Polymers. RSC Sustain. 2024, 2, 2367–2376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fang, Z.; Yang, Y.; Lin, S.; Xu, L.; Chen, S.; Lv, W.; Wang, N.; Dong, S.; Lin, C.; Xie, Y.; et al. Development and Antimicrobial Activity of Composite Edible Films of Chitosan and Nisin Incorporated with Perilla Essential Oil-Glycerol Monolaurate Emulsions. Food Chem. 2025, 462, 141006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ton-That, P.; Dinh, T.A.; Thanh Gia-Thien, H.; Van Minh, N.; Nguyen, T.; Huynh, K.P.H. Novel Packaging Chitosan Film Decorated with Green-Synthesized Nanosilver Derived from Dragon Fruit Stem. Food Hydrocoll. 2025, 158, 110496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tekin, İ.; Ersus, S. Development of Thermoplastic Starch/Poly(Butylene Adipate-Co-Terephthalate) Biobased Active Packaging Films and Potential Usage in the Food Industry. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2024, 141, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- ŞEN, İ. Preparation and Characterization of the Leonardite and Boric Acid Added Polylactic Acid Films for Food Packaging Applications. Ind. Crops Prod. 2024, 222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lawal, U.; Kumar, N.; Samyuktha, R.; Gopi, A.; Robert, V.; Pugazhenthi, G.; Loganathan, S.; Valapa, R.B. Poly (Lactic Acid)/ Amine Grafted Mesoporous Silica-Based Composite for Food Packaging Application. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 277, 134567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kowalczyk, M.; Domaradzki, P.; Skałecki, P.; Kaliniak-Dziura, A.; Stanek, P.; Teter, A.; Grenda, T.; Florek, M. Use of Sustainable Packaging Materials for Fresh Beef Vacuum Packaging Application and Product Assessment Using Physicochemical Means. Meat Sci. 2024, 216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Han, P.; Sun, J.; Mao, S.; Li, F.; Yan, X.; Zhang, T.; Lu, C. Multifunctional Pectin-Based Films Containing Schiff Base Triggered by PH Microenvironment for Freshness Monitoring and Preservation of Fresh-Cut Papayas. Food Hydrocoll. 2024, 157, 110417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, X.; He, J.; Zhang, W.; Khan, M.R.; Ahmad, N.; Tian, W. Pectin Film Fortified with Zein Nanoparticles and Fe3+-Encapsulated Propolis Extract for Enhanced Fruit Preservation. Food Hydrocoll. 2024, 157, 110405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yar, M.S.; Ibeogu, I.H.; Bako, H.K.; Alnadari, F.; Bilal, M.; Rehman, F.; Zhu, J.; Zhou, T.; Zhao, Z.; Li, C. A Novel Carboxymethyl Cellulose/Gum Xanthan and Citric Acid-Based Film That Enhances the Precision of Blackcurrant Anthocyanin-Induced Color Detection for Beef Spoilage Tracking. Food Chem. 2024, 461, 140905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Liu, Z.; Liu, Q.; Lin, L.; Wang, Q.; Ma, W.; Cheng, Q.; Yang, J.; Tang, F.; Xu, M.; Yang, X.; et al. Stepwise Reinforcement Strategy for Guar Gum/Sodium Alginate Based Films: Introduction of Carboxylated Cellulose Nanofibers by Different Methods and Further Calcium Ion Crosslinking. Food Hydrocoll. 2024, 156, 110266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khan, A.; Riahi, Z.; Kim, J.T.; Rhim, J.W. Effect of Carbon Dot-Doped Ti-MOF on CMC/Agar Film and Active Packaging Application on Storage Quality of Fruits. Food Chem. 2024, 455, 139911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Riahi, Z.; Khan, A.; Rhim, J.W.; Shin, G.H.; Kim, J.T. Synergistic Effect of Iron-Based Metal-Organic Framework Hybridized with Carbon Quantum Dots in Agar/Gelatin Films for Fruit Preservation. Food Packag. Shelf Life 2024, 45, 101330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Venu Gopala Kumari, S.; Pakshirajan, K.; Pugazhenthi, G. Application of Active and Environment-Friendly Poly (3-Hydroxybutyrate)/Grapeseed Oil/MgO Nanocomposite Packaging for Prolonging the Shelf-Life of Cherry Tomatoes (Solanum Lycopersicum L. Var. Cerasiforme). Sustain. Chem. Pharm. 2024, 41, 101681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Palmieri, F.; Nii, J.; Tagoe, A.; Maio, L. Di Development of PBS / Nano Composite PHB-Based Multilayer Applications. 2024.
- Mittal, M.; Ahuja, S.; Yadav, A.; Arora, S.; Aggarwal, N.K. Production of Environmentally Benign Poly(Hydroxybutyrate)/Silver Bionanocomposites Reinforced with ZnO for Active Packaging of Bread. Iran. Polym. J. (English Ed. 2024, 33, 787–798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vázquez, M.; Flórez, M.; Cazón, P. A Strategy to Prolong Cheese Shelf-Life: Laminated Films of Bacterial Cellulose and Chitosan Loaded with Grape Bagasse Antioxidant Extract for Effective Lipid Oxidation Delay. Food Hydrocoll. 2024, 156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Priyanka, S.; Namasivayam, S.K.R.; Kennedy, J.F.; Moovendhan, M. Starch-Chitosan-Taro Mucilage Nanocomposite Active Food Packaging Film Doped with Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles – Fabrication, Mechanical Properties, Anti-Bacterial Activity and Eco Toxicity Assessment. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 277, 134319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yousefi, A.M.; Wnek, G.E.; Jimenez, H.G.; Ghassemi, H.; Zhang, J. Investigating the Effects of Temperature, Azodicarbonamide, Boron Nitride, and Multilayer Film/Foam Coextrusion on the Properties of a Poly(Hydroxyalkanoate)/Poly(Lactic Acid) Blend. Polym. Environ. under review. 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Morão, A.; de Bie, F. Life Cycle Impact Assessment of Polylactic Acid (PLA) Produced from Sugarcane in Thailand. J. Polym. Environ. 2019, 27, 2523–2539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Taib, N.-A.A.B.; Rahman, M.R.; Huda, D.; Kuok, K.K.; Hamdan, S.; Bakri, M.K. Bin; Julaihi, M.R.M. Bin; Khan, A. A Review on Poly Lactic Acid (PLA) as a Biodegradable Polymer. Polym. Bull. 2023, 80, 1179–1213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shan, C.; Pandyaswargo, A.H.; Onoda, H. Environmental Impact of Plastic Recycling in Terms of Energy Consumption: A Comparison of Japan’s Mechanical and Chemical Recycling Technologies. Energies 2023, 16, 2199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, S.; Liu, R.; Zhao, J.; Zhang, S.; Hu, X.; Wang, X.; Gao, Z.; Yuan, Y.; Yue, T.; Cai, R.; et al. Enzymatically Green-Produced Bacterial Cellulose Nanoparticle-Stabilized Pickering Emulsion for Enhancing Anthocyanin Colorimetric Performance of Versatile Films. Food Chem. 2024, 453, 139700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chen, X.; Lan, W.; Xie, J. Characterization of Active Films Based on Chitosan/Polyvinyl Alcohol Integrated with Ginger Essential Oil-Loaded Bacterial Cellulose and Application in Sea Bass (Lateolabrax Japonicas) Packaging. Food Chem. 2024, 441, 138343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cerrutti, P.; Roldán, P.; García, R.M.; Galvagno, M.A.; Vázquez, A.; Foresti, M.L. Production of Bacterial Nanocellulose from Wine Industry Residues: Importance of Fermentation Time on Pellicle Characteristics. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2016, 133, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Torres-Giner, S.; Hilliou, L.; Melendez-Rodriguez, B.; Figueroa-Lopez, K.J.; Madalena, D.; Cabedo, L.; Covas, J.A.; Vicente, A.A.; Lagaron, J.M. Melt Processability, Characterization, and Antibacterial Activity of Compression-Molded Green Composite Sheets Made of Poly(3-Hydroxybutyrate-Co-3-Hydroxyvalerate) Reinforced with Coconut Fibers Impregnated with Oregano Essential Oil. Food Packag. Shelf Life 2018, 17, 39–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marczak, H. Energy Inputs on the Production of Plastic Products. J. Ecol. Eng. 2022, 23, 146–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Inemesit Ukpanah Is Polypropylene Bad For The Environment? Statistics, Trends, Facts & Quotes. Available online: https://www.greenmatch.co.uk/polypropylene-environmental-impact (accessed on 9 July 2024).
- Kim, T.; Bhatt, A.; Tao, L.; Benavides, P.T. Life Cycle Analysis of Polylactic Acids from Different Wet Waste Feedstocks. J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 380, 135110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Korol, J.; Hejna, A.; Burchart-Korol, D.; Chmielnicki, B.; Wypiór, K. Water Footprint Assessment of Selected Polymers, Polymer Blends, Composites, and Biocomposites for Industrial Application. Polymers (Basel). 2019, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Benavides, P.T.; Lee, U.; Zarè-Mehrjerdi, O. Life Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Energy Use of Polylactic Acid, Bio-Derived Polyethylene, and Fossil-Derived Polyethylene. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 277, 124010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yu, J.; Chen, L.X.L. The Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Fossil Energy Requirement of Bioplastics from Cradle to Gate of a Biomass Refinery. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2008, 42, 6961–6966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Saavedra del Oso, M.; Nair, R.; Mauricio-Iglesias, M.; Hospido, A. Comparative Life Cycle Analysis of PHA-Based Consumer Items for Daily Use. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2023, 199, 107242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Forte, A.; Dourado, F.; Mota, A.; Neto, B.; Gama, M.; Ferreira, E.C. Life Cycle Assessment of Bacterial Cellulose Production. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 2021, 26, 864–878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Broeren, M.L.M.; Kuling, L.; Worrell, E.; Shen, L. Environmental Impact Assessment of Six Starch Plastics Focusing on Wastewater-Derived Starch and Additives. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2017, 127, 246–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tran, T.; Da, G.; Moreno-Santander, M.A.; Vélez-Hernández, G.A.; Giraldo-Toro, A.; Piyachomkwan, K.; Sriroth, K.; Dufour, D. A Comparison of Energy Use, Water Use and Carbon Footprint of Cassava Starch Production in Thailand, Vietnam and Colombia. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2015, 100, 31–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Muñoz, I.; Rodríguez, C.; Gillet, D.; M. Moerschbacher, B. Life Cycle Assessment of Chitosan Production in India and Europe. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 2018, 23, 1151–1160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sethunga, M.; Gunathilake, K.D.P.P.; Ranaweera, K.K.D.S.; Munaweera, I. Antimicrobial and Antioxidative Electrospun Cellulose Acetate-Essential Oils Nanofibrous Membranes for Active Food Packaging to Extend the Shelf Life of Perishable Fruits. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2024, 97, 103802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fu, X.; Chang, X.; Xu, S.; Xu, H.; Ge, S.; Xie, Y.; Wang, R.; Xu, Y.; Luo, Z.; Shan, Y.; et al. Development of a Chitosan/Pectin-Based Multi-Active Food Packaging with Both UV and Microbial Defense Functions for Effectively Preserving of Strawberry. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 254, 127968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Benlloch-Tinoco, M.; Gentile, P.; Taylor, L.; Girón-Hernández, J. Alginate Edible Films as Delivery Systems for Green Tea Polyphenols. Food Hydrocoll. 2025, 158, 110518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fu, Y.; Yang, D.; Chen, Y.; Shi, J.; Zhang, X.; Hao, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Sun, Y.; Zhang, J. MOF-Based Active Packaging Materials for Extending Post-Harvest Shelf-Life of Fruits and Vegetables. Materials (Basel). 2023, 16, 3406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, J.-S.; Chang, Y.; Park, M.A.; Oh, J.; Han, J. Insect-Repellent Activity of PET-Based Film with Star Anise Essential Oil and Its Pilot-Scale Production for Food Packaging. Food Packag. Shelf Life 2020, 25, 100539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chia, M.-R.; Ahmad, I.; Phang, S.-W. Starch/Polyaniline Biopolymer Film as Potential Intelligent Food Packaging with Colourimetric Ammonia Sensor. Polymers (Basel). 2022, 14, 1122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Musaev, E.; Cantù, E.; Soprani, M.; Serpelloni, M.; Sardini, E.; Ponzoni, A.; De Angelis, C.; Baratto, C. Paper Sensors for Advanced Smart Packaging: Route to Detection on the Shelf and in Real Ambient. IEEE Sens. J. 2024, 1–1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Won, S.; Won, K. Self-Powered Flexible Oxygen Sensors for Intelligent Food Packaging. Food Packag. Shelf Life 2021, 29, 100713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Calabretta, M.M.; Gregucci, D.; Desiderio, R.; Michelini, E. Colorimetric Paper Sensor for Food Spoilage Based on Biogenic Amine Monitoring. Biosensors 2023, 13, 126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kuswandi, B.; Asih, N.P.N.; Pratoko, D.K.; Kristiningrum, N.; Moradi, M. Edible PH Sensor Based on Immobilized Red Cabbage Anthocyanins into Bacterial Cellulose Membrane for Intelligent Food Packaging. Packag. Technol. Sci. 2020, 33, 321–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dodero, A.; Escher, A.; Bertucci, S.; Castellano, M.; Lova, P. Intelligent Packaging for Real-Time Monitoring of Food-Quality: Current and Future Developments. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 3532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Singh, A.K.; Deeba, F.; Kumar, M.; Kumari, S.; Wani, S.A.; Paul, T.; Gaur, N.A. Development of Engineered Candida Tropicalis Strain for Efficient Corncob-Based Xylitol-Ethanol Biorefinery. Microb. Cell Fact. 2023, 22, 201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yele, S.; Litoriya, R. Blockchain-Based Secure Dining: Enhancing Safety, Transparency, and Traceability in Food Consumption Environment. Blockchain Res. Appl. 2024, 5, 100187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qiao, J.; Hao, M.; Guo, M. Design of Meat Product Safety Information Chain Traceability System Based on UHF RFID. Sensors 2023, 23, 3372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Singh, A.; Gutub, A.; Nayyar, A.; Khan, M.K. Redefining Food Safety Traceability System through Blockchain: Findings, Challenges and Open Issues. Multimed. Tools Appl. 2023, 82, 21243–21277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kumar, Y.; Bist, Y.; Thakur, D.; Nagar, M.; Saxena, D.C. A Review on the Role of PH-Sensitive Natural Pigments in Biopolymers Based Intelligent Food Packaging Films. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 276, 133869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- de Oliveira Filho, J.G.; Silva, C.d.O.; do Canto, R.A.; Egea, M.B.; Tonon, R.V.; Paschoalin, R.T.; de Azeredo, H.M.C.; Mattoso, L.H.C. Fast and Sustainable Production of Smart Nanofiber Mats by Solution Blow Spinning for Food Quality Monitoring: Potential of Polycaprolactone and Agri-Food Residue-Derived Anthocyanins. Food Chem. 2024, 457, 140057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gao, S.; Li, M.; Zhai, X.; Wang, W.; Hou, H. Starch as a Smart, Cheap, and Green Gatekeeper for the Controlled Release of Propyl Gallate from Antioxidant Biodegradable Packaging Films. Food Chem. 2024, 453, 139627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sandeep, D.H.; Krushna, B.R.R.; Navya, N.; Santhosh, D.B.; Sharma, S.C.; Krithika, C.; Sridhar, C.; Nirmal Coumare, V.; Nagabhushana, H. Sustainable Fabrication of Fluorescent Carbon Quantum Dots as an Optical Amplifier in Modern Agriculture, Anti-Counterfeiting, Food Packing and Intelligent PH Detection. Mater. Today Sustain. 2024, 27, 100855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-Qahtani, S.D.; Al-Senani, G.M. Green and Sustainable Smart Wooden System Integrated with Cellulose Nanowhiskers-Supported Polyvinyl Alcohol and Anthocyanin Biomolecules to Monitor Food Freshness. Spectrochim. Acta Part A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2024, 318, 124497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]


| Characteristic | Bio-Based Materials | Petroleum-Derived Materials (Plastics) | References |
|---|---|---|---|
| Origin | Biological resources (plants, algae, organic waste, etc.) | Fossil resources (petroleum, natural gas) | [39] |
| Sustainability | High (renewable, lower carbon footprint) | Low (non-renewable, high carbon footprint) | [40,41] |
| Biodegradability | Generally biodegradable under specific conditions | Generally non-biodegradable, persists for centuries | [42] |
| Compostability | Many are compostable (such as PLA in industrial composting) | Rarely compostable, requires special processes | [43] |
| Decomposition time | Months to a few years (depending on conditions) | 400 to 1,000 years for plastics like PET | [43] |
| Greenhouse gas emissions | Reduced (during production and decomposition) | High (during both production and decomposition) | [44] |
| Environmental impact | Lower impact (less pollution, sustainable life cycle) | High impact (pollution, microplastics, long-lasting waste) | [2] |
| Recyclability | Variable (some are recyclable, but with limitations) | High recyclability for some plastics (like PET), but depends on infrastructure | [45] |
| Production cost | Can be higher currently (emerging technologies) | Generally lower, due to established production scale | [46] |
| Availability of raw materials | Depends on agriculture, waste, and biotechnology; generally more available in agricultural regions | Dependent on petroleum reserves, limited and concentrated in specific geographic regions | [47] |
| Technological innovation | Rapidly growing area with investments in biotechnology and new production processes | Mature technology, less innovation in new raw materials, focus on recycling and energy efficiency | [46,48] |
| Social impact | Can generate jobs in rural areas, stimulating local economies | Concentration of wealth in regions with petroleum reserves, negative impacts on local communities due to extraction | [49] |
| Compatibility with environmental regulations | Generally compliant with stricter environmental regulations, aligned with carbon reduction goals | Subject to strict regulations due to pollution and carbon emissions | [9] |
| Life cycles and embedded energy | Lower embedded energy in some cases, especially if produced locally; energy used in composting or biodegradation | High embedded energy from extraction to processing, along with energy costs for recycling or final disposal | [50] |
| Examples of products and brands | Packaging by “Natura,” PLA utensils, biodegradable starch-based bags | Coca-Cola bottles (PET), Tupperware food containers (PE), supermarket plastic bags (PE) | - |
| Waste reduction potential | Greater potential for waste reduction due to compostability and biodegradability | Lower waste reduction potential, but recyclability in established waste management chains | [42,43] |
| Impact on human health | Generally perceived as safer, but studies are ongoing to understand all effects | Potential migration of chemical additives to food and beverages, concerns about microplastics | [9] |
| Functional performance | Boa barreira ao oxigênio e umidade (varia conforme o tipo) | Excellent barrier to oxygen and moisture | [15] |
| Mechanical Strength | Good, but may be inferior compared to traditional plastics | Generally superior, high durability and strength | [12,15] |
| Consumer perception | Positive (associated with sustainability) | Negative in terms of environmental impact, but reliable in functionality | [9,48] |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).