Submitted:
31 March 2025
Posted:
01 April 2025
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Most available studies on the mechanical properties of apples lack the comprehensive results needed for the construction and validation of static FEM models. Researchers typically focus on either the flesh and epidermis or the whole fruit, often overlooking the maturity stage of the examined apples. They usually report only firmness or the starch index as indicators of maturity. Furthermore, many studies use store-bought apples, which is impractical for industrial applications since this fruit has already undergone various treatments before reaching the shelf. This article aims to determine the mechanical properties of apples necessary for constructing static FEM models that are both adequate and useful for the industry. The new Polish apple variety, Chopin, was selected as the research material. The study was conducted for three stages of apple maturity: development, ripening, and senescence. Mechanical properties of the flesh and skin were determined as material data for FEM models. Force-displacement curves and pressure-force functions were examined for future model validation. Using micro-computed tomography, the bruise volumes of fruit subjected to 20%, 50%, and 80% of the destructive force were determined. Significant differences were found between apples in the senescence stage and those in the development and ripening stages. Results of Micro-Ct and the results of modified and real compression tests of whole fruit have allowed us to formulate the research hypothesis regarding the influence of flesh cracking (characterized by local drops of force), influencing the bruise visibility and detection.
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Research Material
2.2. Determination of Basic Physicochemical Properties of Fruit
2.3. Determination of Strength Properties of Apple Flesh and Skin
2.3.1. Flesh
2.3.2. Skin
2.4. Determination of Strength Properties of Apple Fruit
2.5. Determination of the Bruise Geometry and Volume Using Micro-Computed Tomography
3. Results
3.1. Characteristics of the Material Selected for Testing
3.1. Basic Physicochemical Properties of Fruit
3.1. Strength Properties of Apple Flesh and Skin
3.1. Strength Properties of Apple Fruit
3.1. Bruises Volume
4. Discussion
6. Conclusions
- The study demonstrated that the mechanical behavior of apples is strongly influenced by ripening stage, which must be precisely accounted for when constructing FEM models for food industry applications.
- A complete dataset of mechanical properties and Micro-CT-based bruise volumes was developed for three distinct maturity stages of Chopin apples, supporting both material model definition and validation.
- The findings indicate that flesh cracking during compression, visible as local force drops, may play a key role in bruise visibility and detection, forming the basis for a new research hypothesis.
- Among the maturity stages, apples in ripening maturity exhibited the highest destructive force and elastic modulus, though not the highest resistance to bruising, indicating complex structural dynamics.
- The mechanical characterization of the Chopin cultivar, previously studied mainly in terms of biochemical properties, provides novel insights relevant to the design of robotic harvesting systems and mechanical fruit handling.
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Kistechok, A.; Wrona, D.; Krupa, T. Effect of Storage Conditions on the Storability and Nutritional Value of New Polish Apples Grown in Central Poland. Agriculture (Switzerland) 2024, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ponder, A.; Jariené, E.; Hallmann, E. The Effect of Storage Conditions on the Content of Molecules in Malus Domestica ‘Chopin’ Cv. and Their In Vitro Antioxidant Activity. Molecules 2022, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kistechok, A.; Wrona, D.; Krupa, T. Quality and Nutritional Value of ‘Chopin’ and Clone ‘JB’ in Relation to Popular Apples Growing in Poland. Agriculture (Switzerland) 2022, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Noiton, D.A.M.; Alspach, P.A. Founding Clones, Inbreeding, Coancestry, and Status Number of Modern Apple Cultivars; 1996; Vol. 121;
- Zygmunt Hejnowicz Anatomia i Histogeneza Roślin Naczyniowych; Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN: Warszawa, 2002; Vol. 1;
- Pratt, C. Apple Flower and Fruit: Morphology and Anatomy; 1988;
- Zdunek, A.; Kozioł, A.; Cybulska, J.; Lekka, M.; Pieczywek, P.M. The Stiffening of the Cell Walls Observed during Physiological Softening of Pears. Planta 2016, 243, 519–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Billy, L.; Mehinagic, E.; Royer, G.; Renard, C.M.G.C.; Arvisenet, G.; Prost, C.; Jourjon, F. Relationship between Texture and Pectin Composition of Two Apple Cultivars during Storage. Postharvest Biol Technol 2008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Videcoq, P.; Barbacci, A.; Assor, C.; Magnenet, V.; Arnould, O.; Le Gall, S.; Lahaye, M. Examining the Contribution of Cell Wall Polysaccharides to the Mechanical Properties of Apple Parenchyma Tissue Using Exogenous Enzymes. J Exp Bot 2017, 68, 5137–5146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bich, L.; Pradeu, T.; Moreau, J.F. Understanding Multicellularity: The Functional Organization of the Intercellular Space. Front Physiol 2019, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wei, J.; Ma, F.; Shi, S.; Qi, X.; Zhu, X.; Yuan, J. Changes and Postharvest Regulation of Activity and Gene Expression of Enzymes Related to Cell Wall Degradation in Ripening Apple Fruit. Postharvest Biol Technol 2010, 56, 147–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Contigiani, E. V.; Jaramillo-Sánchez, G.; Castro, M.A.; Gómez, P.L.; Alzamora, S.M. Postharvest Quality of Strawberry Fruit (Fragaria x Ananassa Duch Cv. Albion) as Affected by Ozone Washing: Fungal Spoilage, Mechanical Properties, and Structure. Food Bioproc Tech 2018, 11, 1639–1650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Juxia, W.; Qingliang, C.; Hongbo, L.; Yaping, L. Experimental Research on Mechanical Properties of Apple Peels. Journal of Engineering and Technological Sciences 2015, 47, 688–705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Z.; Thomas, C. Quantitative Evaluation of Mechanical Damage to Fresh Fruits. Trends Food Sci Technol 2014, 35, 138–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Farkas, Cs.; Petróczki, K.; Fenyvesi, L. Method for Measuring Fruit Failure Caused by Different Mechanical Loads. Hungarian Agricultural Engineering 2016, 51–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mayorga-Martínez, A.A.; Olvera-Trejo, D.; Elías-Zúñiga, A.; Parra-Saldívar, R.; Chuck-Hernández, C. Non-Destructive Assessment of Guava (Psidium Guajava L.) Maturity and Firmness Based on Mechanical Vibration Response. Food Bioproc Tech 2016, 9, 1471–1480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fathizadeh, Z.; Aboonajmi, M.; Beygi, S.R.H. Nondestructive Firmness Prediction of Apple Fruit Using Acoustic Vibration Response. Sci Hortic 2020, 262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fadiji, T.; Coetzee, C.; Pathare, P.; Opara, U.L. Susceptibility to Impact Damage of Apples inside Ventilated Corrugated Paperboard Packages: Effects of Package Design. Postharvest Biol Technol 2016, 111, 286–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stropek, Z.; Gołacki, K. A New Method for Measuring Impact Related Bruises in Fruits. Postharvest Biol Technol 2015, 110, 131–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Diels, E.; van Dael, M.; Keresztes, J.; Vanmaercke, S.; Verboven, P.; Nicolai, B.; Saeys, W.; Ramon, H.; Smeets, B. Assessment of Bruise Volumes in Apples Using X-Ray Computed Tomography. Postharvest Biol Technol 2017, 128, 24–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Van De Looverbosch, T.; Vandenbussche, B.; Verboven, P.; Nicolaï, B. Nondestructive High-Throughput Sugar Beet Fruit Analysis Using X-Ray CT and Deep Learning. Comput Electron Agric 2022, 200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Herremans, E.; Melado-Herreros, A.; Defraeye, T.; Verlinden, B.; Hertog, M.; Verboven, P.; Val, J.; Fernández-Valle, M.E.; Bongaers, E.; Estrade, P.; et al. Comparison of X-Ray CT and MRI of Watercore Disorder of Different Apple Cultivars. Postharvest Biol Technol 2014, 87, 42–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, L.J.; Zhang, Q.; Song, H.; Wang, Z.W. Mechanical Damage of ‘Huangguan’ Pear Using Different Packaging under Random Vibration. Postharvest Biol Technol 2022, 187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bejaei, M.; Stanich, K.; Cliff, M.A. Modelling and Classification of Apple Textural Attributes Using Sensory, Instrumental and Compositional Analyses. Foods 2021, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Stopa, R.; Szyjewicz, D.; Komarnicki, P.; Kuta, Ł. Determining the Resistance to Mechanical Damage of Apples under Impact Loads. Postharvest Biol Technol 2018, 146, 79–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tomala, K.; Grzęda, M.; Guzek, D.; Głąbska, D.; Gutkowska, K. The Effects of Preharvest 1-Methylcyclopropene (1-MCP) Treatment on the Fruit Quality Parameters of Cold-Stored ‘Szampion’ Cultivar Apples. Agriculture (Switzerland) 2020, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pijanowski, E.; Mrożewski, S.; Horubała, A.; Jarczyk, A. Technologia Produktów Owocowych i Warzywnych; PWRiL: Warszawa, 1973. [Google Scholar]
- Słupska, M.; Stopa, R.; Figiel, A. 3D FEM Modeling of Polish Apple ‘Chopin’: Elastic vs. Elastoplastic Behavior Across Maturity Stages. Preprints (Basel) 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Komarnicki, P.; Stopa, R.; Szyjewicz, D.; Młotek, M. Evaluation of Bruise Resistance of Pears to Impact Load. Postharvest Biol Technol 2016, 114, 36–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Komarnicki, P.; Stopa, R.; Szyjewicz, D.; Kuta, Ł.; Klimza, T. Influence of Contact Surface Type on the Mechanical Damages of Apples Under Impact Loads. Food Bioproc Tech 2017, 10, 1479–1494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sawicka, M.; Latocha, P.; Łata, B. Peel to Flesh Bioactive Compounds Ratio Affect Apple Antioxidant Potential and Cultivar Functional Properties. Agriculture (Switzerland) 2023, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Przybyłko, S.; Kowalczyk, W.; Wrona, D. Article the Effect of Mycorrhizal Fungi and Pgpr on Tree Nutritional Status and Growth in Organic Apple Production. Agronomy 2021, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ji, W.; Qian, Z.; Xu, B.; Tang, W.; Li, J.; Zhao, D. Grasping Damage Analysis of Apple by End-Effector in Harvesting Robot. J Food Process Eng 2017, 40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jia, W.; Zhang, Y.; Lian, J.; Zheng, Y.; Zhao, D.; Li, C. Apple Harvesting Robot under Information Technology: A Review. Int J Adv Robot Syst 2020, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Roman Stopa Modelowanie Deformacji Korzenia Marchwi w Warunkach Obciążeń Skupionych Metodą Elementów Skończonych. Monografia, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Przyrodniczego we Wrocławiu: Wrocław, 2010.
- Murase, H.; Merva, G.E.; Segerlind, L.J.; Member Member Member, A.; Asae, A.; Abstract, A. Variation of Young’s Modulus of Potato as A Function of Water Potential; 1980.







| Stage of ripeness |
Density, kg⋅m3 |
Average Diameter, mm |
Average Height, mm |
Water content, % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Development | 995.16±10.96 | 76.95±1.16 | 64.56±2.17 | 85.57±4.20 |
| Ripening | 1037.21±18.56 | 78.48±1.83 | 63.79±3.44 | 84.10±1.80 |
| Senescence | 1047.22±20.24 | 77.88±1.71 | 65.51±3.58 | 83.42±4.30 |
| Stage of ripeness |
Firmness, N | Soluble solids content, % |
Starch index, - |
Streif index, - |
Ethylene concentration, µLC2H4 ∙ L-1 |
Malic acid content, % |
Pectin content, g∙100g s.m -1 [%] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Development | 72.6 ±2.4 | 11.60±0.49 | 5±0.60 | 0.12 | 0.1 | 0.83 | 9.53 |
| Ripening | 67.7±1.6 | 14.00±0.25 | 7±0.40 | 0.07 | 12 | 0.78 | 7.20 |
| Senescence | 56.9±7.9 | 14.60±0.97 | 9±1.10 | 0.04 | 31 | 0.66 | 4.07 |
| Stage of ripeness |
Skin | Flesh | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Modulus of Elasticity, MPa |
Modulus of Elasticity, MPa |
Poisons Ratio, - |
|
| Development | 10.78±2.26 | 5.04±0.75 | 0.25±0.03 |
| Ripening | 7.18±1.29 | 5.12±0.86 | 0.21±0.07 |
| Senescence | 5.23±1.86 | 3.85±0.78 | 0.35±0.10 |
| Region 1 - Elastic region | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stage of ripeness | Inflection point, N |
Displacement, mm |
Contact Surface, mm2 | Surface Pressure, MPa |
| Development | 344.72±3.45 | 7.31±0.29 | 723.41±76.67 | 0.49±0.039 |
| Ripening | 339.14±5.96 | 7.55±0.28 | 806.24±25.99 | 0.44±0.014 |
| Senescence | 262.41±2.58 | 4.73±0.38 | 630.65±49.82 | 0.40±0.034 |
| Region 2 - Plastic region | ||||
| Stage of ripeness | Flesh failure point, N | Displacement, mm |
Contact Surface, mm2 | Surface Pressure, MPa |
| Development | 646.15±8.47 | 12.98±0.34 | 1258.8.4±79.98 | 0.52±0.031 |
| Ripening | 658.76±10.14 | 13.16±0.57 | 1419.60±116.64 | 0.46±0.037 |
| Senescence | 576.95±67.24 | 12.99±1.27 | 1355.80±213.119 | 0.41±0.065 |
| Region 3 - Final failure | ||||
| Stage of ripeness | Skin failure point, N | Displacement, mm |
Contact Surface, mm2 | Surface Pressure, MPa |
| Development | 751.29±8.47 | 19.02±0.76 | 1826.00±163.24 | 0.41±0.038 |
| Ripening | 757.50±10.14 | 20.42±1.17 | 2005.20±123.45 | 0.38±0.014 |
| Senescence | 674.18±67.24 | 17.95±2.41 | 1865.20±212.65 | 0.36±0.045 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).