Submitted:
07 September 2024
Posted:
09 September 2024
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction:
- Principles to Manage Soil for Health:
- a.
- Maximize Presence of Living Roots
- b.
- Minimize Disturbance
- c.
- Maximize Soil Cover
- d.
- Maximize Biodiversity


2. Application of AI in Soil Health Management
- a.
- Soil Monitoring and Analysis
- b.
- Predictive Modelling
- c.
- Precision Agriculture
- d.
- Disease and Pest Detection
- e.
- Recommendation Systems
- f.
- Autonomous Farming Equipment
3. Literature Review
| Reference | Technique | Strength | Limitations |
| Plant, et.al. [9]- 1989 |
CALEX | Prepares scheduling guidelines for crop management | Time consuming |
| Gholami, et.al. [10]-2017 | ANN (Artificial Neural Network) |
To estimate soil erosion, high calculation speed, high accuracy | Plots required to monitor rill erosion |
| Zhao, et.al. [11]-2007 | ANN | High-resolution soil texture maps generated using coarse resolution soil texture map | Low accuracy |
| Mosaffaei, et.al. [12]-2020 | ANN | Predict degradation in national park management plan | Adaptation challenge with new data. |
| Shao, et.al. [13]-2021 | BP-ANN (Back Propagation- Artificial Neural Network) |
Classify and evaluate soil quality, where soil nutrients contaminated with heavy metal contamination in the arid area | Expensive |
| Dahmardeh, et.al. [14]-2017 | ANN, ANFIS (Adaptive Neuro-fuzzy Inference System) |
The effects of tillage type, temperature, sodium are evaluated based on type of intercropping to carbon-nitrogen ratio | Measures only two chemical properties |
| Pellegrini, et.al. [15]-2021 | ANN | Predict Soil microbial-biomass from soil physical and chemical properties | Only a few cases were studied. |
| Jalal, et.al. [16]-2021 | ANN, ANFIS, GEP (Gene Expression Programming) |
Prediction models developed to evaluate swell pressure and unconfined compression strength of expansive soils | Internet dependent |
| Kim, et.al. [17]-2008 | ANN | Estimates soil erosion, NH4–N concentrations and dissolved P of runoff | Not accurate for higher erosion values |
| Arsoy, et.al. [18]-2013 | ANN | Soil water content determination based on dielectric permittivity measurement | Time consuming |
| Liu, et.al. [19]- 2015 |
SVM (Support Vector Machine) | Classification and assessment of urban soil quality | sensitive to outliers |
| Guan, et.al. [20]-2011 | SVM | Soil salinity prediction for irrigation water management in irrigation districts | Prior Knowledge of EC value required |
| Mustafa, et.al. [21]-2018 | SVM | Geospatial prediction of soil erosion | High Complexity |
| Wijitdechakul, et.al. [22]-2016 | UAV (Unmanned Aerial Vehicle) |
Interpret the plant health conditions for user. | Expensive |
| Pluer, et.al. [23]-2020 | UAV | To test field scale variation in soil characteristics | High complexity |
| Krenz, et.al. [24]-2019 | UAV | To identify the degradation status of soils | Tussocks or exposed shrub roots cannot be detected |
| Falco, et.al. [25]-2018 | UAV | To estimate sprout density and plant vigor throughout the growing season | High complexity |
| Rosa, et.al. [26]-1999 | ImpelERO | To evaluate soil erosion | Time consuming |
| Kaufamann, et.al. [27]-2009 | Fuzzy logic expert system | To evaluate the plant productivity of restored soils | Internet dependent. |
| Ahsanuzzaman, et.al. [28]-2004 | Expert system | To evaluate groundwater pollution from application of manure to soil | Internet-based. |
4. Case Study
- This section addresses the application of Artificial Intelligence for soil health management, providing a detailed view of data input, algorithms used, features, characteristics and the optimal results obtained.
| REFERENCE | DATA INPUT | ALGORITHM | FEATURES | CHARACTERISTICS | OPTIMAL RESULTS |
| Fernandes, et.al. [29]-2019 | 8556 Samples |
ANN | Estimates soil organic matter content from soil chemical attributes | Soil Organic matter | R2=0.76, RMSE=1.98g Kg-1 |
| Mirzaee, et.al. [30]-2016 | 100 soil samples | ANNSK (Artificial Neural Network Simple Kriging) |
To predict soil organic matter content | Soil Organic matter | R2=0.633, RMSE=0.271 |
| Somaratne, et.al. [31]-2005 | 240 soil samples | ANN, MLR (Multivariate Linear Regression) |
to predict SOC contents across different land use patterns | Soil Organic matter |
|
| Bouasria, et.al. [32]-2020 | 369 soil samples | DT (Decision Tree), K-NN (K- Nearest Neighbour), ANN |
To predict soil organic matter content | Soil Organic matter | ANN:(MS image: R2=0.6553, PAN image: R2=0.6985) |
| Huang, et.al. [33]- 2020 |
102 soil samples | BPNN, SVR (Support Vector Regression), PLSR (Partial Least Square Regression) |
To predict soil organic matter concentration | Soil Organic matter |
|
| Swetha, et.al. [34]- 2020 |
90 soil samples | RF (Random Forest), CNN (Convolution Neural Network) |
a smartphone application for predicting soil texture | Soil Texture | Clay (R2=0.97-0.98), Sand (R2=0.96– 0.98), Silt (R2=0.62–
|
| Zhao, et.al. [35]- 2009 |
450 sampling points |
ANN | To predict soil texture based on soil attributes obtained from existing coarse resolution soil maps | Soil Texture | LM:(RMSE- Clay:7.9, Sand:16.6), RP:(RMSE- Clay:8.5, Sand:14.9) |
| Penghui, et.al. [36]-2020 | Various types of variables | ANFIS- GOA, ANFIS-SSA, ANFIS- GWO, ANFIS-PSO, ANFIS-GA, ANFIS-DA | To predict soil temperature | Soil Temperature | ANFIS-mSG was found to be efficient |
| Sattari, et.al. [37]- 2020 |
3995 Records |
DT-GBT (Decision Tree-Gradient Boosted Tree) |
To predict the soil temperature at | Soil Temperature | NS:0.9446–0.9942, KGE:0.857–0.995, R:0.9793–0.9971 |
| Behmanesh, et.al. [38]-2017 | Soil temperature dataset (1997- 2008) |
GEP, ANN, MLR | To estimate the soil temperature at different depths | Soil Temperature | ANN performed efficiently |
| John, et.al. [39]- 2020 |
60 soil samples | ANN, SVM, RF, MLR | Estimation of soil organic content and soil nutrient indicators | Soil Organic Content Soil Nutrient |
RF:R2=0.68, SVM:R2=0.36, ANN:R2=0.36, MLR:R2=0.17 |
| Pathumuthusabana, et.al. [40]-2021 | 1700 soil sample images | CNN, Lenet, AlexNet, Vgg16 | classification of SOC and soil macronutrients | Soil Organic Content, Soil Macronutrients | Accuracy: Lenet:77.4%, AlexNet:85.31%, Vgg16:87.38% |
| Rajamanickam, et.al. [41]-2021 | 1000 Samples |
DT, KNN, SVM | Predicts soil fertility based on macro and micro nutrients status | Soil Fertility | MSE (DT:0.01, KNN:0.6897, SVM_linear:0.6552 SVM_rbf:0.559 |
| Zhang, et.al. [42]- 2021 |
Various types of variables | DT, RF | Predicts soil fertility | Soil Fertility | RF and DT are the most accurate methods |
| Hassan-Esfahani, et.al. [43]-2015 | Various types of variables | ANN, UAV | Estimates surface soil moisture | Soil Moisture | RMSE:2.0, MAE:1.3, R2:0.77 |
| Gill, et.al. [44]- 2006 |
Various types of variables | SVM, ANN | Predicts soil moisture | Soil Moisture | SVM performed efficiently |
| Prakash, et.al. [45]-2020 | Various types of variables | MLR, SVM, RNN (Recurrent Neural Network) |
Predicts Soil Moisture | Soil Moisture | MLR performed efficiently |
| Sarmadian, et.al. [46]-2008 | 125 soil samples | MLR, ANN | Predicts soil parameters | Soil Properties | ANN performed efficiently |
| Kurnaz, et.al. [47]- 2015 |
Various types of variables | ANN | Predicts compression and recompression index of soil | Soil Properties | Compression index(R2=0.8973), Recompression Index(R2=0.3600) |
| Mohanty, et.al. [48]-2015 | 721 soil samples | ANN | Evaluates Pedotransfer function of Field Capacity and Permanent Wilting Point | Soil Properties | ANN indicated unbiased and higher predictability |
5. Limitations of Artificial Intelligence in Soil Health Management
- Data Quality and Quantity: AI models require a significant amount of high-quality data to effectively analyze and predict soil health. Obtaining comprehensive and accurate soil data can be a challenge, especially in remote or under-studied regions.
- Model Interpretability: Some AI models, such as deep learning neural networks, can be complex and difficult to interpret. Understanding how the AI reaches its conclusions about soil health can be crucial for gaining trust from users and stakeholders.
- Integration with Traditional Practices: Integrating AI technologies with existing soil management practices and workflows can be challenging. Ensuring that AI recommendations align with local knowledge and practices is essential for successful adoption.
- Cost: Implementing AI solutions for soil health management can require significant financial resources, especially for collecting data, developing models, and deploying technology in the field. Cost can be a barrier for small-scale farmers or resource- constrained agricultural organizations.
- Regulatory and Ethical Concerns: There may be regulatory challenges around data ownership, privacy, and ethical considerations when using AI for soil health management. Ensuring compliance with relevant laws and regulations is essential to avoid legal issues.
6. Conclusion
References
- Chen, Q., Li, L., Chong, C. and Wang, X., 2022. AI-enhanced soil management and smart farming. Soil Use and Management, 38(1), pp.7-13. [CrossRef]
- Bannerjee, G., Sarkar, U., Das, S. and Ghosh, I., 2018. Artificial intelligence in agriculture: A literature survey. international Journal of Scientific Research in computer Science applications and Management Studies, 7(3), pp.1-6.
- Available online: https://tracegenomics.com/.
- Home | Natural Resources Conservation Service (usda.gov).
- Miner, G.L., Delgado, J.A., Ippolito, J.A. and Stewart, C.E., 2020. Soil health management practices and crop productivity. Agricultural & Environmental Letters, 5(1), p.e20023. [CrossRef]
- Lal, R., 2016. Soil health and carbon management. Food and energy security, 5(4), pp.212-222. [CrossRef]
- Kumar, A., Sharma, H. and Kumar, S., 2022. AI-Based Soil Fertility Management Review: Challenges And Opportunities. Journal of Survey in Fisheries Sciences, pp.283-288. [CrossRef]
- Zhang, X., Yang, P. and Lu, B., 2024. Artificial intelligence in soil management: The new frontier of smart agriculture. Advances in Resources Research, 4(2), pp.231-251. [CrossRef]
- Plant, R.E., 1989. An artificial intelligence-based method for scheduling crop management actions. Agricultural systems, 31(1), pp.127-155. [CrossRef]
- Gholami, V., Booij, M.J., Tehrani, E.N. and Hadian, M.A., 2018. Spatial soil erosion estimation using an artificial neural network (ANN) and field plot data. Catena, 163, pp.210-218. [CrossRef]
- Zhao, Z., Chow, T.L., Rees, H.W., Yang, Q., Xing, Z. and Meng, F.R., 2009. Predict soil texture distributions using an artificial neural network model. Computers and electronics in agriculture, 65(1), pp.36-48. [CrossRef]
- Mosaffaei, Z., Jahani, A., Chahouki, M.A.Z., Goshtasb, H., Etemad, V. and Saffariha, M., 2020. Soil texture and plant degradation predictive model (STPDPM) in national parks using artificial neural network (ANN). Modeling Earth Systems and Environment, 6(2), pp.715-729. [CrossRef]
- Shao, W., Guan, Q., Tan, Z., Luo, H., Li, H., Sun, Y. and Ma, Y., 2021. Application of BP-ANN model in evaluation of soil quality in the arid area, northwest China. Soil and Tillage Research, 208, p.104907. [CrossRef]
- Dahmardeh, M.E.H.D.I., KESHTEGAR, B. and Piri, J.A.M.S.H.I.D., 2017. Assessment chemical properties of soil in intercropping using ANN and ANFIS models. Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science, 23(2).
- Pellegrini, E., Rovere, N., Zaninotti, S., Franco, I., De Nobili, M. and Contin, M., 2021. Artificial neural network (ANN) modelling for the estimation of soil microbial biomass in vineyard soils. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 57(1), pp.145-151. [CrossRef]
- Jalal, F.E., Xu, Y., Iqbal, M., Javed, M.F. and Jamhiri, B., 2021. Predictive modeling of swell-strength of expansive soils using artificial intelligence approaches: ANN, ANFIS and GEP. Journal of Environmental Management, 289, p.112420. [CrossRef]
- Kim, M. and Gilley, J.E., 2008. Artificial Neural Network estimation of soil erosion and nutrient concentrations in runoff from land application areas. Computers and electronics in agriculture, 64(2), pp.268-275. [CrossRef]
- Arsoy, S., Ozgur, M., Keskin, E. and Yilmaz, C., 2013. Enhancing TDR based water content measurements by ANN in sandy soils. Geoderma, 195, pp.133-144. [CrossRef]
- Liu, Y., Wang, H., Zhang, H. and Liber, K., 2016. A comprehensive support vector machine-based classification model for soil quality assessment. Soil and Tillage Research, 155, pp.19-26. [CrossRef]
- Guan, X., Wang, S., Gao, Z. and Lv, Y., 2013. Dynamic prediction of soil salinization in an irrigation district based on the support vector machine. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 58(3-4), pp.719-724. [CrossRef]
- Mustafa, M.R.U., Sholagberu, A.T., Yusof, K.W., Hashim, A.M., Khan, M.W.A. and Shahbaz, M., 2018. SVM-based geospatial prediction of soil erosion under static and dynamic conditioning factors. In MATEC Web of Conferences (Vol. 203, p. 04004). EDP Sciences. [CrossRef]
- Wijitdechakul, J., Sasaki, S., Kiyoki, Y. and Koopipat, C., 2016, September. UAV-based multispectral image analysis system with semantic computing for agricultural health conditions monitoring and real-time management. In 2016 International Electronics Symposium (IES) (pp. 459-464). IEEE.
- Pluer, E.M., Robinson, D.T., Meinen, B.U. and Macrae, M.L., 2020. Pairing soil sampling with very-high resolution UAV imagery: An examination of drivers of soil and nutrient movement and agricultural productivity in southern Ontario. Geoderma, 379, p.114630. [CrossRef]
- Krenz, J., Greenwood, P. and Kuhn, N.J., 2019. Soil degradation mapping in drylands using Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) data. Soil Systems, 3(2), p.33. [CrossRef]
- Falco, N., Wainwright, H., Ulrich, C., Dafflon, B., Hubbard, S.S., Williamson, M., Cothren, J.D., Ham, R.G., McEntire, J.A. and McEntire, M., 2018, July. Remote sensing to UAV-based digital farmland. In IGARSS 2018-2018 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (pp. 5936-5939). IEEE.
- De la Rosa, D., Mayol, F., Moreno, J.A., Bonsón, T. and Lozano, S., 1999. An expert system/neural network model (ImpelERO) for evaluating agricultural soil erosion in Andalucia region, southern Spain. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 73(3), pp.211-226. [CrossRef]
- Kaufmann, M., Tobias, S. and Schulin, R., 2009. Quality evaluation of restored soils with a fuzzy logic expert system. Geoderma, 151(3-4), pp.290-302. [CrossRef]
- Ahsanuzzaman, A.N.M., Zaman, M. and Kolar, R., 2004. Simple expert system for evaluation of nutrient pollution potential in groundwater from manure application. International Journal of Geomechanics, 4(4), pp.285-295. [CrossRef]
- Fernandes, M.M.H., Coelho, A.P., Fernandes, C., da Silva, M.F. and Marta, C.C.D., 2019. Estimation of soil organic matter content by modeling with artificial neural networks. Geoderma, 350, pp.46-51. [CrossRef]
- Mirzaee, S., Ghorbani-Dashtaki, S., Mohammadi, J., Asadi, H. and Asadzadeh, F., 2016. Spatial variability of soil organic matter using remote sensing data. Catena, 145, pp.118-127. [CrossRef]
- Somaratne, S., Seneviratne, G. and Coomaraswamy, U., 2005. Prediction of soil organic carbon across different land-use patterns: A neural network approach. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 69(5), pp.1580-1589. [CrossRef]
- Bouasria, A., Namr, K.I., Rahimi, A. and Ettachfini, E.M., 2020, October. Soil organic matter estimation by using Landsat-8 pansharpened image and machine learning. In 2020 Fourth International Conference On Intelligent Computing in Data Sciences (ICDS) (pp. 1-8). IEEE. [CrossRef]
- Huang, D., Liu, H., Zhu, L., Li, M., Xia, X. and Qi, J., 2020. Soil organic matter determination based on artificial olfactory system and PLSR-BPNN. Measurement Science and Technology, 32(3), p.035801. [CrossRef]
- Swetha, R.K., Bende, P., Singh, K., Gorthi, S., Biswas, A., Li, B., Weindorf, D.C. and Chakraborty, S., 2020. Predicting soil texture from smartphone-captured digital images and an application. Geoderma, 376, p.114562. [CrossRef]
- Zhao, Z., Chow, T.L., Rees, H.W., Yang, Q., Xing, Z. and Meng, F.R., 2009. Predict soil texture distributions using an artificial neural network model. Computers and electronics in agriculture, 65(1), pp.36-48. [CrossRef]
- Penghui, L., Ewees, A.A., Beyaztas, B.H., Qi, C., Salih, S.Q., Al-Ansari, N., Bhagat, S.K., Yaseen, Z.M. and Singh, V.P., 2020. Metaheuristic optimization algorithms hybridized with artificial intelligence model for soil temperature prediction: Novel model. IEEE Access, 8, pp.51884-51904. [CrossRef]
- Sattari, M.T., Avram, A., Apaydin, H. and Matei, O., 2020. Soil temperature estimation with meteorological parameters by using tree-based hybrid data mining models. Mathematics, 8(9), p.1407. [CrossRef]
- Behmanesh, J. and Mehdizadeh, S., 2017. Estimation of soil temperature using gene expression programming and artificial neural networks in a semiarid region. Environmental Earth Sciences, 76, pp.1-15. [CrossRef]
- John, K., Abraham Isong, I., Michael Kebonye, N., Okon Ayito, E., Chapman Agyeman, P. and Marcus Afu, S., 2020. Using machine learning algorithms to estimate soil organic carbon variability with environmental variables and soil nutrient indicators in an alluvial soil. Land, 9(12), p.487. [CrossRef]
- Pathumuthusabana, A.M. and Priyadharsini, S.S., 2021. An Artificial Intelligence-Based Evaluation of Soil Fertility. In Handbook of Green Engineering Technologies for Sustainable Smart Cities (pp. 255-275). CRC Press.
- Rajamanickam, J., 2021. Predictive model construction for prediction of soil fertility using decision tree machine learning algorithm. INFOCOMP Journal of Computer Science, 20(1).
- Zhang, P., Guo, Z., Ullah, S., Melagraki, G., Afantitis, A. and Lynch, I., 2021. Nanotechnology and artificial intelligence to enable sustainable and precision agriculture. Nature Plants, 7(7), pp.864-876. [CrossRef]
- Hassan-Esfahani, L., Torres-Rua, A., Jensen, A. and McKee, M., 2015. Assessment of surface soil moisture using high-resolution multi-spectral imagery and artificial neural networks. Remote Sensing, 7(3), pp.2627-2646. [CrossRef]
- Gill, M.K., Asefa, T., Kemblowski, M.W. and McKee, M., 2006. Soil moisture prediction using support vector machines 1. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 42(4), pp.1033-1046. [CrossRef]
- Prakash, S., Sharma, A. and Sahu, S.S., 2018, April. Soil moisture prediction using machine learning. In 2018 Second International Conference on Inventive Communication and Computational Technologies (ICICCT) (pp. 1-6). IEEE. [CrossRef]
- Sarmadian, F. and Taghizadeh Mehrjardi, R., 2008. Modeling of some soil properties using artificial neural network and multivariate regression in Gorgan Province, North of Iran. Global Journal of Environmental Research, 2(1), pp.30-35.
- Kurnaz, T.F., Dagdeviren, U., Yildiz, M. and Ozkan, O., 2016. Prediction of compressibility parameters of the soils using artificial neural network. SpringerPlus, 5, pp.1-11. [CrossRef]
- Mohanty, M., Sinha, N.K., Painuli, D.K., Bandyopadhyay, K.K., Hati, K.M., Sammi Reddy, K. and Chaudhary, R.S., 2015. Modelling soil water contents at field capacity and permanent wilting point using artificial neural network for Indian soils. National Academy Science Letters, 38, pp.373-377. [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
