Submitted:
03 September 2024
Posted:
03 September 2024
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Related Work
2.1. Hydroponics
Hydroponic Benefits Such as Water Conservation, Optimal Use of Space and the Impacts on the Environment
4. Hydroponic Cultivation Techniques
4.1. Wick Framework
4.2. Ebb and Flow System
4.3. Deep Water Culture (DWC)
4.4. Nutrient Film Technique
4.5. Aeroponics
4.6. Drip System
| Feature | Traditional Soil-Based Farming | Hydroponics | Citation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Advantages | Low beginning expense, laid out rehearses, different yield choices, normal supplement cycling, potential for natural creation | More significant returns, quicker development cycles, all year creation, decreased water utilization, less land required, lower sickness and nuisance pressure | [40] |
| Disadvantages | Dependent on soil quality and atmospheric conditions, inclined to disintegration and supplement exhaustion, requires more land and water, higher work for undertakings like weeding and bug control | Higher introductory venture, requires controlled climate and steady checking, potential for supplement awkward nature, not reasonable for all yields | [41] |
| Water Usage | High, defenseless to dry season and requires standard water system | Possibly lower, utilizes shut circle frameworks and limits vanishing | [42] |
| Land Use | Requires bigger land regions, restricted to reasonable soil conditions | Can use more modest spaces, possibly reasonable for metropolitan regions and vertical cultivating | [43] |
| Nutrient Runoff | Potential for manure and pesticide filtering into soil and streams | Lower hazard of spillover, takes into account exact supplement control | [44] |
| Energy Consumption | Lower, basically depends on normal daylight and precipitation | Higher, may require fake lighting and environment control frameworks relying upon area | [45] |
4.7. Seed Germination

5. Substrates

5.1. Ideal Crops for Hydroponics
| Type | Common Name | Scientific Name | Cultivation Technique |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fruit | Banana Black Currant Blueberry Melon Passionfruit Paw-Paw Pineapple Red Currant |
Musa spp. Ribes nigrum Vaccinium corymbosum Cucumis melo Passiflora edulis Asimina triloba Ananas comosus Ribes rubrum |
Drip irrigation Drip irrigation Drip irrigation, NFT Drip irrigation, NFT Drip irrigation Drip irrigation Drip irrigation Drip irrigation |
| Vegetable | Cauliflower Celery Cucumber Eggplant Endive |
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis Apium graveolens Cucumis sativus Solanum melongena Cichorium endivia |
Drip irrigation, NFT Drip irrigation Drip irrigation, NFT Drip irrigation Drip irrigation |
| Fodder | Fodder | Various species | Drip irrigation |
| Herb | Basil Chicory Chives Fennel Lavender Lemon Balm Marjoram Mint Mustard Cress Parsley |
Ocimum basilicum Cichorium intybus Allium schoenoprasum Foeniculum vulgare Lavandula spp. Melissa officinalis Origanum majorana Mentha spp. Lepidium sativum Petroselinum crispum |
Drip irrigation Drip irrigation Drip irrigation Drip irrigation Drip irrigation Drip irrigation Drip irrigation Drip irrigation Drip irrigation Drip irrigation |
| Flower | African Violets Anthurium Antirrhinum Aphelandra Aster Begonia |
Saintpaulia ionantha Anthurium andraeanum Antirrhinum majus Aphelandra squarrosa Aster spp. Begonia spp. |
DWC, drip irrigation Drip irrigation Drip irrigation Drip irrigation Drip irrigation Drip irrigation |
5.2. Nutrient Solution
| Essential Plant Element | Symbol | Primary Form | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Non Mineral Element | Carbon | C | CO2 (g) |
| Hydrogen | H | H2O(1), H+ | |
| Oxygen | O | H2O(1), O2(g) |
|
| Mineral Elements | |||
| Primary Macronutrients | Nitrogen | N | NH [4]+ , NO [3]- |
| Phosphorus | P | HPO4 [2]- |
|
| Potassium | K | K+ | |
| Secondary Macronutrients | Calcium | Ca | Ca [2]+ |
| Magnesium | Mg | Mg+ | |
| Sulfur | S | SO4 [2]- | |
| Macronutrients | Iron | Fe | Fe [3]+, Fe [2]+ |
| Manganese | Mn | Mn [2]+ | |
| Zinc | Zn | Zn [2]+ | |
| Copper | Cu | Cu [2]+ | |
| Boron | B | B(OH)3 | |
| Molybdenum | Mo | MoO4 [2]- | |
| Chlorine | Cl | Cl- | |
| Nickel | Ni | Ni [2]+ | |
5.3. pH in Hydroponics Nutrient Solutions
| Plants | pH | PPM |
|---|---|---|
| Banana | 5.5-6.5 | 1260-1540 |
| Black Currant | 6.0 | 980-1260 |
| Blueberry | 4.0-5.0 | 1260-1400 |
| Melon | 5.5-6.0 | 1400-1750 |
| Passionfruit | 6.5 | 840-1680 |
| Paw-Paw | 6.5 | 1400-1680 |
| Pineapple | 5.5-6.0 | 1400-1680 |
| Red Currant | 6.0 | 980-1260 |
| Rhubarb | 5.0-6.0 | 840-1400 |
| Strawberries | 5.5-6.5 | 1260-1540 |
| Watermelon | 5.8 | 1260-1680 |
| Cauliflower | 6.0-7.0 | 1050-1400 |
| Celery | 6.5 | 1260-1680 |
| Cucumber | 5.8-6.0 | 1190-1750 |
| Eggplant | 5.5-6.5 | 1750-2450 |
| Endive | 5.5 | 1400-1680 |
| Fodder | 6 | 1260-1400 |
| Garlic | 6 | 980-1260 |
| Leek | 6.5-7.0 | 980-1260 |
| Lettuce | 5.5-6.5 | 560-840 |
| Marrow | 6 | 1260-1680 |
| Okra | 6.5 | 1400-1680 |
| Onions | 6.0-6.7 | 980-1260 |
| Pak-choi | 7 | 1050-1400 |
| Parsnip | 6 | 980-1260 |
| Pea | 6.0-7.0 | 980-1260 |
| Peppers | 5.8-6.3 | 1400-2100 |
| Bell peppers | 6.0-6.5 | 1400-1750 |
| Hot Peppers | 6.0-6.5 | 2100-2450 |
| Potato | 5.0-6.0 | 1400-1750 |
| Pumpkin | 5.5-7.5 | 1260-1680 |
| Radish | 6.0-7.0 | 840-1540 |
| Spinach | 5.5-6.6 | 1260-1610 |
| Silverbeet | 6.0-7.0 | 1260-1610 |
| Sweet Corn | 6 | 840-1680 |
| Sweet Potato | 5.5-6.0 | 1400-1750 |
| Tomato | 5.5-6.5 | 1400-3500 |
| Turnip | 6.0-6.5 | 1260-1680 |
| Zucchini | 6 | 1260-1680 |
| Basil | 5.5-6.5 | 700-1120 |
| Chicory | 5.5-6.0 | 1400-1600 |
| Chives | 6.0-6.5 | 1260-1540 |
| Fennel | 6.4-6.8 | 700-980 |
| Lavender | 6.4-6.8 | 700-980 |
| Lemon Balm | 5.5-6.5 | 700-1120 |
| Marjoram | 6 | 1120-1400 |
| Mint | 5.5-6.0 | 1400-1680 |
| Mustard Cress | 6.0-6.5 | 840-1680 |
| Parsley | 5.5-6.0 | 560-1260 |
| Rosemary | 5.5-6.0 | 700-1120 |
| Sage | 5.5-6.5 | 700-1120 |
| Thyme | 5.5-7.0 | 560-1120 |
| Watercress | 6.5-6.8 | 280-1260 |
| African Violets | 6.0-7.0 | 840-1050 |
| Anthurium | 5.0-6.0 | 1120-1400 |
| Antirrhinum | 6.5 | 1120-1400 |
| Aphelandra | 5.0-6.0 | 1260-1680 |
| Aster | 6.0-6.5 | 1260-1680 |
| Begonia | 6.5 | 980-1260 |
| Bromeliads | 5.0-7.5 | 560-840 |
| Caladium | 6.0-7.5 | 1120-1400 |
| Canna | 6 | 1260-1680 |
| Carnation | 6 | 1260-2450 |
| Chrysanthemum | 6.0-6.2 | 1400-1750 |
| Cymbidiums | 5.5 | 420-560 |
| Dahlia | 6.0-7.0 | 1050-1400 |
| Dieffenbachia | 5 | 1400-1680 |
| Dracaena | 5.0-6.0 | 1400-1680 |
| Ferns | 6 | 1120-1400 |
| Ficus | 5.5-6.0 | 1120-1680 |
| Freesia | 6.5 | 700-1400 |
| Impatiens | 5.5-6.5 | 1260-1400 |
| Gerbera | 5.0-6.5 | 1400-1750 |
| Gladiolus | 5.5-6.5 | 1400-1680 |
| Monstera | 5.0-6.0 | 1400-1680 |
| Palms | 6.0-7.5 | 1120-1400 |
| Roses | 5.5-6.0 | 1050-1750 |
| Stock | 6.0-7.0 | 1120-1400 |
5.4. Appropriate Technology for Small and Medium-Scale Food Production With Hydroponic

5.5. Agriculture 4.0
6. Role of ML in Disease Detection
6.1. Improving Supplement Conveyance
6.1.1. Custom-Made Supplement Dosing
6.1.2. Expecting Supplement Necessities
6.1.3. Unique Changes
6.2. Monitoring Plant Health
6.2.1. Early Disease Recognition
6.2.2. Stress Identification
6.2.3. Individual Plant Tracking
7. Contextual Analyses of Reconciliation of IoT and AI in Aquaculture

8. Challenges and Opportunitie
| Sr. No. | Challenge | Opportunity | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Data availability Most of the time, the Mnemonist AI will encounter limited data for training its ML models. | Design methods for having low-cost sensors and methods of data gathering | [85] |
| 2 | Data Quality An example of low-quality data can be noisy or inconsistent values of a sensor. | Using of techniques with regards to filtering and cleaning of research data | |
| 3 | Data Specificity Models are not transportable from one system to another | Establish methods of transfer learning in the context of the hydroponics | |
| 4 | Infrastructural Requirements Expensive sensors and internet-service | Review on how domain knowledge can be used in the creation of ML models to improve on interpretability | |
| 5 | The evaluation Expertise models are often referred to as “black box” models meaning it hard to understand them. | Research on incorporating domain knowledge into ML models for better interpretability | |
| 6 | Costs The first of ownership in the technology is relatively high. | Find ways to lower the cost of production and examine ways growers can finance their produce. | |
| 7 | A disadvantage that resulted from it is knowledge gap whereby some farmers lack technical know-how | Provide training programs and support services for hydroponic growers | |
| 8 | Intensive changes Extremes of temperature and humidity hydroponic systems are affected | Create a system adaptable to online data updates of the phenomena like pH and temperature using the ML algorithm. | [86] |
| 9 | Distinct Characteristics of Plants Compliance with crops of different kinds | Studying the opportunities of applying machine learning in particular plant systems |
9. Future Directions
Conclusion
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Rahman, M. A.; Chakraborty, N. R.; Sufiun, A.; Banshal, S. K.; Tajnin, F. R. An AIoT-Based Hydroponic System for Crop Recommendation and Nutrient Parameter Monitorization. Smart Agricultural Technology 2024, 8, 100472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mohd Azmi, K. H.; Mohamed Radzi, N. A.; Ahmad, A. THE FUTURE OF SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE: A REVIEW OF IOT AND AUTONOMOUS CONTROL IN VERTICAL HYDROPONIC FARMING. AEEE 2024, 22(2), 146–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bovas Herbert Bejaxhin, A.; Brucely, Y.; Rose, D. D.; Mahesh, G.; Sharma, S.; Singh, R.; Kumar, A.; Abbas, M. Revolutionizing Agriculture: A Comprehensive Research on IoT Controlled Fluid Circulation in Hydroponics Using Plumbed PVC Planting Pipes for Enhanced Crop Growth and Disease Detection with CFD Analysis. Environ Fluid Mech 2024. [CrossRef]
- (Rathor, A. S.; Choudhury, S.; Sharma, A.; Nautiyal, P.; Shah, G. Empowering Vertical Farming through IoT and AI-Driven Technologies: A Comprehensive Review. Heliyon 2024, 10(15), e34998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sadek, N.; Kamal, N.; Shehata, D. Internet of Things Based Smart Automated Indoor Hydroponics and Aeroponics Greenhouse in Egypt. Ain Shams Engineering Journal 2024, 15(2), 102341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Scoones, I. Confronting Uncertainties in Pastoral Areas: Transforming Development from Control to Care. Social Anthropology/Anthropologie Sociale 2023, 31 (4), 57–75.
- Vos, R. Agricultural and Rural Transformations in Asian Development: Past Trends and Future Challenges; 929256529X; WIDER Working Paper, 2018.
- Dev, S. M. Inclusive Development In India: Agriculture, Hunger, Poverty, Inequalities and Human Development. IASSI Quarterly 2024, 43 (1).
- Dev, S. M. Regional Dimensions in India: Economic Growth, Inclusive and Sustainable Development. J. Quant. Econ. 2024, 22(2), 245–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kukde, R. B.; Negi, P.; Kad, V. Urban Agriculture: A New Dimension in Alternative Farming Systems for Achieving the Target of Food for All. In Food Production, Diversity, and Safety Under Climate Change; Chakraborty, R., Mathur, P., Roy, S., Eds.; Advances in Science, Technology & Innovation; Springer Nature Switzerland: Cham, 2024; pp 39–51. [CrossRef]
- Mohanty, U. C.; Sinha, P.; Nageswara Rao, M. M.; Swain, D. K.; Singh, K. K. Climate Risk Management in Agriculture: Monthly and Seasonal Forecast Application; Springer International Publishing: Cham, 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Morales, D.; Molares, S.; Ladio, A. Patagonian Ethnopedology and Its Role in Food Security: A Case Study of Rural Communities in Arid Environments of Argentina. Journal of Ethnobiology 2023, 43(2), 176–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Palande, V.; Zaheer, A.; George, K. Fully Automated Hydroponic System for Indoor Plant Growth. Procedia Computer Science 2018, 129, 482–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mehra, M.; Saxena, S.; Sankaranarayanan, S.; Tom, R. J.; Veeramanikandan, M. IoT Based Hydroponics System Using Deep Neural Networks. Computers and electronics in agriculture 2018, 155, 473–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cho, W.-J.; Kim, H.-J.; Jung, D.-H.; Kim, D.-W.; Ahn, T. I.; Son, J.-E. On-Site Ion Monitoring System for Precision Hydroponic Nutrient Management. Computers and electronics in agriculture 2018, 146, 51–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gentry, M. Local Heat, Local Food: Integrating Vertical Hydroponic Farming with District Heating in Sweden. Energy 2019, 174, 191–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chowdhury, M. E.; Khandakar, A.; Ahmed, S.; Al-Khuzaei, F.; Hamdalla, J.; Haque, F.; Reaz, M. B. I.; Al Shafei, A.; Al-Emadi, N. Design, Construction and Testing of IoT Based Automated Indoor Vertical Hydroponics Farming Test-Bed in Qatar. Sensors 2020, 20(19), 5637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mohamed, E. S.; Belal, A.; Abd-Elmabod, S. K.; El-Shirbeny, M. A.; Gad, A.; Zahran, M. B. Smart Farming for Improving Agricultural Management. The Egyptian Journal of Remote Sensing and Space Science 2021, 24(3), 971–981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tatas, K.; Al-Zoubi, A.; Antoniou, A.; Zolotareva, D. Iponics: Iot Monitoring and Control for Hydroponics; IEEE, 2021; pp 1–5.
- Ramakrishnam Raju, S.; Dappuri, B.; Ravi Kiran Varma, P.; Yachamaneni, M.; Verghese, D. M. G.; Mishra, M. K. Design and Implementation of Smart Hydroponics Farming Using IoT-Based AI Controller with Mobile Application System. Journal of Nanomaterials 2022, 2022(1), 4435591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chakraborty, T.; Mohapatra, S.; Wanglar, C.; Pandey, D. Applied Molecular Cloning: Present and Future for Aquaculture. In Synthetic Biology-New Interdisciplinary Science; IntechOpen, 2019.
- Ahmed, M.; Hasanuzzaman, M.; Raza, M. A.; Malik, A.; Ahmad, S. Plant Nutrients for Crop Growth, Development and Stress Tolerance. Sustainable agriculture in the era of climate change 2020, 43–92. [Google Scholar]
- Ibrahim, L. A.; Abu-Hashim, M.; Shaghaleh, H.; Elsadek, E.; Hamad, A. A. A.; Alhaj Hamoud, Y. A Comprehensive Review of the Multiple Uses of Water in Aquaculture-Integrated Agriculture Based on International and National Experiences. Water 2023, 15(2), 367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Castilla-Gavilán, M.; Muñoz-Martínez, M.; Zuasti, E.; Canoura-Baldonado, J.; Mondoñedo, R.; Hachero-Cruzado, I. Yield, Nutrients Uptake and Lipid Profile of the Halophyte Salicornia Ramosissima Cultivated in Two Different Integrated Multi-Trophic Aquaculture Systems (IMTA). Aquaculture 2024, 583, 740547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arun, M. N.; Hebbar, S. S.; Senthivel, T.; Nair, A. K.; Padmavathi, G.; Pandey, P.; Singh, A. Seed Priming: The Way Forward to Mitigate Abiotic Stress in Crops; IntechOpen London, UK, 2022; Vol. 11.
- Sabry, S. STUDIES ON CABBAGE ALTERNARIA LEAF SPOT DISEASE, 2016. [CrossRef]
- Wagan, M. A.; Wagan, F. A. A Study on Hydroponic Farming System of Wheat for Sustainable Development of Agriculture. International Journal of Agricultural Economics7 (1) 2022, 1–3. [Google Scholar]
- Muhasin, H. J.; Gheni, A. Y.; Tajuddin, N. I. I.; Izni, N. A.; Jusoh, Y. Y.; Aziz, K. A. A Systematic Literature Review for Smart Hydroponic System. Bulletin of Electrical Engineering and Informatics 2024, 13(1), 656–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chipfakacha, C. T. Aquaculture the New Way of Creating Sustainable Livelihoods Among Rural Populations in Africa. A Case of Seke Rural District Zimbabwe. International Journal of Agricultural Extension and Rural Development Studies. 2024, 11(1), 33–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- (Gautam, T.; Srivastava, A.; Jain, S. Financial Evaluation of Urban Cooperative Banks—A Machine Learning Approach. Procedia Computer Science 2024, 235, 3428–3437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Incemehmetoğlu, A.; Yildiz, F.; Özen, C. INVESTIGATION THE EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT SUPPORT MEDIUM ON PRODUCT WITH NUTRIENT FILM TECHNIQUE IN HYDROPONIC PLANT GROWTH; 2012. [CrossRef]
- Pélisse, J. Ebb and Flow. Laypeople in Law: Socio-Legal Perspectives on Non-Professionals 2024, 2.
- Bhagawati, R.; Paul, S.; Dambale, A. FARM WASTE MANAGEMENT; 2020; pp 77–105. [CrossRef]
- Nursyahid, A.; Setyawan, T. A.; Sa’diyah, K.; Wardihani, E. D.; Helmy, H.; Hasan, A. Analysis of Deep Water Culture (DWC) Hydroponic Nutrient Solution Level Control Systems. IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng. 2021, 1108 (1), 012032. [CrossRef]
- Carroll, P. A.; Buss, G. P.; Griffith, M. A. C.; Yang, X.; Griffis Jr., J. L.; Papkov, G.; Bauer, S.; Jackson, K.; Singh, A. K. The Comparative Performance of Soil-Based Systems with Hydroponics. AS 2023, 14 (08), 1087–1097. [CrossRef]
- Primawan, A. B.; Kusuma, N. D. Nutrition Control in Nutrient Film Technique Hydroponic System Using Fuzzy Method. In E3S Web of Conferences; EDP Sciences, 2024; Vol. 475, p 04002.
- Lakhiar, I.; Gao, J.; Syed, T.; Chandio, F. A.; Buttar, N. Modern Plant Cultivation Technologies in Agriculture under Controlled Environment: A Review on Aeroponics. Journal of Plant Interactions 2018, 13. [CrossRef]
- Yadav, B. S.; Chauhan, R. P. S. Drip Fertigation Technology for Enhancing Water and Nutrient Use Efficiency in Arid Agro-Ecosystem of Irrigated North-Western Rajasthan.
- Sudana, D.; Eman, D.; Suyoto, S. IoT Based: Hydroponic Using Drip Non-Circulation System for Paprika; 2019; p 128. [CrossRef]
- Cech, T. V. Principles of Water Resources: History, Development, Management, and Policy; Wiley, 2018.
- O’Quinn, A.; Behera, S. J.; Kim, E.; Pan, M. Engineering an Improved Hydroponics System. 2024.
- Fuentes-Peñailillo, F.; Gutter, K.; Vega, R.; Silva, G. C. New Generation Sustainable Technologies for Soilless Vegetable Production. Horticulturae 2024, 10(1), 49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar, N. Hydroponics and Environmental Bioremediation: Wastewater Treatment; Springer Nature, 2024.
- Kumar, P. A Cyber-Physical System Approach for Precision Agriculture Focused on Crop Growth. Master’s Thesis, Arizona State University, 2024. https://search.proquest.com/openview/257605a85ccafbd3f79d2daa733a8dad/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y (accessed 2024-08-21).
- (Ragaveena, S.; Shirly Edward, A.; Surendran, U. Smart Controlled Environment Agriculture Methods: A Holistic Review. Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology 2021, 20 (4), 887–913. [CrossRef]
- Carrera-Castaño, G.; Mira, S.; Fañanás-Pueyo, I.; Sánchez-Montesino, R.; Contreras, Á.; Weiste, C.; Dröge-Laser, W.; Gómez, L.; Oñate-Sánchez, L. Complex Control of Seed Germination Timing by ERF 50 Involves RGL 2 Antagonism and Negative Feedback Regulation of DOG1. New Phytologist 2024, 242(5), 2026–2042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Finch-Savage, W. E.; Bassel, G. W. Seed Vigour and Crop Establishment: Extending Performance beyond Adaptation. Journal of Experimental Botany 2016, 67(3), 567–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mnif Fakhfakh, L.; Abassi, S.; Chaieb, M. Effect of Temperature, Salinity and Water Potential on Seed Germination of Annual Grass Stipa Capensis. Arid Land Research and Management 2024, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, H.; Wang, F.; Damari, R. N.; Chen, X.; Lin, Z. Molecular Mechanisms Underlying the Signal Perception and Transduction during Seed Germination. Molecular Breeding 2024, 44(4), 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Binzunga, M. M. Performance of Cassava Planting Materials Produced Using the “Semi Autotrophic Hydroponics” Technology in the Laboratory and Across Locations in the Democratic Republic of Congo. PhD Thesis, JKUAT-CoANRE, 2024. http://ir.jkuat.ac.ke/handle/123456789/6383 (accessed 2024-08-21).
- Vinci, G.; Rapa, M. Hydroponic Cultivation: Life Cycle Assessment of Substrate Choice. BFJ 2019, 121(8), 1801–1812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bagga, D.; Chauhan, S.; Bhavanam, A.; GN, N.; Meena, S. S.; Mohanty, A. Recent Advancements in Fermentation Strategies for Mass Production and Formulation of Biofertilizers: Towards Waste Valorization. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition 2024, 1–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Soroush, M.; Roostaei, M.; Hosseini, S. A.; Mohammadtabar, M.; Pourafshary, P.; Mahmoudi, M.; Ghalambor, A.; Fattahpour, V. Challenges and Potentials for Sand and Flow Control and Management in the Sandstone Oil Fields of Kazakhstan: A Literature Review. SPE Drilling & Completion 2021, 36 (01), 208–231. [CrossRef]
- Putra, P. A.; Yuliando, H. Soilless Culture System to Support Water Use Efficiency and Product Quality: A Review. Agriculture and Agricultural Science Procedia 2015, 3, 283–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tian, M.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, S.; Yu, C.; Ostrikov, K.; Zhang, Z. Overcoming the Permeability-Selectivity Challenge in Water Purification Using Two-Dimensional Cobalt-Functionalized Vermiculite Membrane. Nature Communications 2024, 15(1), 391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yap, Z. S.; Khalid, N. H. A.; Haron, Z.; Mohamed, A.; Tahir, M. M.; Hasyim, S.; Saggaff, A. Waste Mineral Wool and Its Opportunities—A Review. Materials 2021, 14(19), 5777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Verasoundarapandian, G.; Zakaria, N. N.; Shaharuddin, N. A.; Khalil, K. A.; Puasa, N. A.; Azmi, A. A.; Gomez-Fuentes, C.; Zulkharnain, A.; Wong, C. Y.; Rahman, M. F.; Ahmad, S. A. Coco Peat as Agricultural Waste Sorbent for Sustainable Diesel-Filter System. Plants 2021, 10(11), 2468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chandramenon, P.; Aggoun, A.; Tchuenbou-Magaia, F. Smart Approaches to Aquaponics 4.0 with Focus on Water Quality − Comprehensive Review. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 2024, 225, 109256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qureshi, T. A.; Gadhi, T. A.; Khokhar, D. A.; Ali, I.; Memon, N.; Channa, N.; Bakhat, S.; Rafique, T.; Mahar, R. B. Insight on the Properties of Pumice Mineral for the Combined Adsorption Distillation of Membrane Reject Water. Minerals 2023, 13(9), 1131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sangeetha, T.; Periyathambi, E. Automatic Nutrient Estimator: Distributing Nutrient Solution in Hydroponic Plants Based on Plant Growth. PeerJ Computer Science 2024, 10, e1871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vishalakshi, R.; Mangai, S. Introduction of Artificial Intelligence. In Smart Systems for Industrial Applications; Venkatesh, C., Rengarajan, N., Ponmurugan, P., Balamurugan, S., Eds.; Wiley, 2022; pp 141–171. [CrossRef]
- Verma, M. AI and Machine Learning: Supervised Learning Techniques Based on IoMT. In Advances in Medical Technologies and Clinical Practice; Pandey, R., Gupta, A., Pandey, A., Eds.; IGI Global, 2022; pp 196–206. [CrossRef]
- Plant Micronutrients: Deficiency and Toxicity Management; Aftab, T., Hakeem, K. R., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2020.
- Araújo, S. O.; Peres, R. S.; Barata, J.; Lidon, F.; Ramalho, J. C. Characterising the Agriculture 4.0 Landscape—Emerging Trends, Challenges and Opportunities. Agronomy 2021, 11 (4), 667. [CrossRef]
- Rose, D. C.; Wheeler, R.; Winter, M.; Lobley, M.; Chivers, C.-A. Agriculture 4.0: Making It Work for People, Production, and the Planet. Land Use Policy 2021, 100, 104933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jafar, A.; Bibi, N.; Naqvi, R. A.; Sadeghi-Niaraki, A.; Jeong, D. Revolutionizing Agriculture with Artificial Intelligence: Plant Disease Detection Methods, Applications, and Their Limitations. Frontiers in Plant Science 2024, 15, 1356260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mishra, S.; Dash, A.; Jena, L. Use of Deep Learning for Disease Detection and Diagnosis. In Bio-inspired Neurocomputing; Bhoi, A. K., Mallick, P. K., Liu, C.-M., Balas, V. E., Eds.; Springer Singapore: Singapore, 2021; pp. 181–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Faye, D.; Diop, I. Survey on Crop Disease Detection and Identification Based on Deep Learning. In Innovations and Interdisciplinary Solutions for Underserved Areas; Mambo, A. D., Gueye, A., Bassioni, G., Eds.; Springer Nature Switzerland: Cham, 2022. [Google Scholar]
- Ramcharan, A.; Baranowski, K.; McCloskey, P.; Ahmed, B.; Legg, J.; Hughes, D. P. Deep Learning for Image-Based Cassava Disease Detection. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 1852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dansana, D.; Sahoo, S.; Mishra, B. K. Efficiency and Reliability of IoT in Smart Agriculture. In Internet of Things and Analytics for Agriculture, Volume 3; Pattnaik, P. K., Kumar, R., Pal, S., Eds.; Springer Singapore: Singapore, 2022; pp. 301–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ashour, M. A.; Nasser, M. S. A.; Abu-Zaid, T. S. Evaluation of the Effects of Improving Tertiary Earthen Canals on Water Savings, Conveyance Efficiency, and Agricultural Productivity. Ain Shams Engineering Journal 2024, 102850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vandam, D.; Anderson, T.; De Villiers, D.; Timmons, M. Growth and Tissue Elemental Composition Response of Spinach (Spinacia Oleracea) to Hydroponic and Aquaponic Water Quality Conditions. Horticulturae 2017, 3(2), 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ullah, A.; Aktar, S.; Sutar, N.; Kabir, R.; Hossain, A. Cost Effective Smart Hydroponic Monitoring and Controlling System Using IoT. ICA 2019, 10(04), 142–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- (Babcock University; F.Y, O.; J.E.T, A.; O, A.; J. O, H.; O, O.; J, A. Supervised Machine Learning Algorithms: Classification and Comparison. IJCTT 2017, 48 (3), 128–138. [CrossRef]
- Cohen, A. R.; Chen, G.; Berger, E. M.; Warrier, S.; Lan, G.; Grubert, E.; Dellaert, F.; Chen, Y. Dynamically Controlled Environment Agriculture: Integrating Machine Learning and Mechanistic and Physiological Models for Sustainable Food Cultivation. ACS EST Eng. 2022, 2(1), 3–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wongpatikaseree, K.; Hnoohom, N.; Yuenyong, S.; Jaidee, S. Facial Action Units Recognition Using Deep Learning Model with Bottleneck Features. In 2021 25th International Computer Science and Engineering Conference (ICSEC); 2021; pp 318–323. [CrossRef]
- Chaganti, S. Y.; Nanda, I.; Pandi, K. R.; Prudhvith, T. G. N. R. S. N.; Kumar, N. Image Classification Using SVM and CNN. In 2020 International Conference on Computer Science, Engineering and Applications (ICCSEA); 2020; pp 1–5. [CrossRef]
- Sánchez-Reolid, R.; Martínez-Rodrigo, A.; López, M. T.; Fernández-Caballero, A. Deep Support Vector Machines for the Identification of Stress Condition from Electrodermal Activity. Int. J. Neur. Syst. 2020, 30(07), 2050031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Osco, L. P.; Arruda, M. dos S. de; Gonçalves, D. N.; Dias, A.; Batistoti, J.; Souza, M. de; Gomes, F. D. G.; Ramos, A. P. M.; Jorge, L. A. de C.; Liesenberg, V.; Li, J.; Ma, L.; Marcato, J.; Gonçalves, W. N. A CNN Approach to Simultaneously Count Plants and Detect Plantation-Rows from UAV Imagery. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 2021, 174, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pain, C.; Tynan, C.; Botchway, S. W.; Kriechbaumer, V. Variable-Angle Epifluorescence Microscopy for Single-Particle Tracking in the Plant ER. In The Plant Endoplasmic Reticulum: Methods and Protocols; Springer, 2024; pp 273–283.
- Green, A. G.; Abdulai, A.-R.; Duncan, E.; Glaros, A.; Campbell, M.; Newell, R.; Quarshie, P.; KC, K. B.; Newman, L.; Nost, E.; Fraser, E. D. G. A Scoping Review of the Digital Agricultural Revolution and Ecosystem Services: Implications for Canadian Policy and Research Agendas. FACETS 2021, 6, 1955–1985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mokhtar, A.; El-Ssawy, W.; He, H.; Al-Anasari, N.; Sammen, S. Sh.; Gyasi-Agyei, Y.; Abuarab, M. Using Machine Learning Models to Predict Hydroponically Grown Lettuce Yield. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 706042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Leung, M. K. K.; Delong, A.; Alipanahi, B.; Frey, B. J. Machine Learning in Genomic Medicine: A Review of Computational Problems and Data Sets. Proceedings of the IEEE 2016, 104(1), 176–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ojo, M. O.; Zahid, A. Deep Learning in Controlled Environment Agriculture: A Review of Recent Advancements, Challenges and Prospects. Sensors 2022, 22(20), 7965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alabdulatif, A.; Thilakarathne, N. N. Bio-Inspired Internet of Things: Current Status, Benefits, Challenges, and Future Directions. Biomimetics 2023, 8(4), 373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sarkar, A.; Majumder, M. Real-Time Monitoring of Water Requirement in Protected Farms by Using Polynomial Neural Networks and Image Processing. Environment, Development and Sustainability 2019, 21 (3), 1451–1483. [CrossRef]
- El-Tabakh, M. A. M.; Abd El-Samea, M. A.; Roby, Y. A.; Mohamed, Y. A.; Harb, H. E.; Saleh, A. M.; Abd El-Aziz, M. H.; El-Abeid, S. E. Digital Agriculture for Enhancing Yield, Nutrition, and Biological Stress Resistance. In Digital Agriculture: A Solution for Sustainable Food and Nutritional Security; Priyadarshan, P. M., Jain, S. M., Penna, S., Al-Khayri, J. M., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, 2024; pp. 445–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vinod, M.; Rajendra, K.; Prasad, S. V. S. Smart Green Farming Management System Using IoT; Hyderabad, India, 2020; p 030016. [CrossRef]














| Sr. No. |
Title of the Article/Paper Author Year of publication |
Focus of Study, Design, Objectives, Method used and Sample size | Findings of the study and their conclusions | Remarks of the Scholar on Limitation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | Palande, Vaibhav, Adam Zaheer, and Kiran George. “Fully automated hydroponic system for indoor plant growth.” Procedia Computer Science 129 (2018): 482-488 [13] |
A framework is made that can develop normal plants and vegetables and can work without contingent upon the external environment utilizing a method called Tank-farming. | i. An Internet of Things (IoT) network is made to further develop unwavering quality and permit remote checking and controlling. ii. The client is simply expected to establish a seedling and set introductory boundaries. |
i. The System is monitored and controlled by end user once inputs from different sensors collect large amount data through the IoT system. ii. Initial parameter for Germination and fruit stage nutrition balance are not addressed. |
| 2. | Mehra, Manav, et al. “IoT based hydroponics system using Deep Neural Networks.” Computers and electronics in agriculture 155 (2018): 473-486. [14] |
Profound Brain Organization for anticipating the proper control activity towards controlling the tank-farming framework which are characterized into eight marks. | i. An wise IoT based tank-farming framework is created by taking the tomato plant as a contextual investigation. In here five boundaries taken as contribution for controlling the tank-farming climate which is pH, temperature, dampness, level, lighting. ii. These boundaries are prepared utilizing Profound Brain network towards giving the suitable control activity which is named and precision of 88% is acquired. |
i. The system could be prolonged by deploying the intelligent IoT based Hydroponic system with Deep Neural Network for other hydroponic grown plants toward attaining higher accuracy. ii. The system could be extended by growing a more hydroponic plant in dissimilar tanks and accordingly training the constraints for manufacturing the suitable control action by applying intelligence. |
| 3. | Cho, Woo-Jae, et al. “On-site ion monitoring system for precision hydroponic nutrient management.” Computers and electronics in agriculture 146 (2018): 51-58. [15] |
An on location particle observing framework in light of particle specific terminals (ISEs) that can naturally adjust sensors and measure the convergences of individual particles (NO3−, K+, and Ca2+) in tank-farming arrangements. | This empowers ranchers to successfully oversee supplements in reused arrangements by quickly recognizing any irregular characteristics that show up in the supplement proportions. ii. Consequently align sensors and measure the groupings of individual particles (NO3−, K+, and Ca2+) in aquaculture arrangements. |
i. Additional study needed for stage wise (Seedling, Germination, Fruit) deadline of nutrition’s balance. 2. Solubility timing of nutrition’s is essential to be recognized for the better growth of plants. |
| 4. | Gentry, Matthew. “Local heat, local food: Integrating vertical hydroponic farming with district heating in Sweden.” Energy 174 (2019): 191-197. [16] | Setting Vertical Aqua-farming Cultivating (VHFs) on the region warming matrix can diminish the bring temperature back. | i. Vertical Aqua-farming Cultivating can lessen food miles, asset use, and CO2 outflows. ii. Putting VHFs on the region warming network can lessen the bring temperature back. |
i. Not all crops can be grown successfully in a vertical hydroponic system. The plants that do best in these systems tend to be those that are slighter in size, grow quickly, and have shallow root systems. ii. Energy ingesting or water use is increased. |
| 5. | Chowdhury, Muhammad EH, et al. “Design, construction and testing of IoT based automated indoor vertical hydroponics farming test-bed in qatar.” Sensors 20.19 (2020): 5637. [17] | The client of a tank-farming framework can get ongoing signs from this framework when the climate is ominous. | IoT observing the boundaries(temperature, light frequency, pH, EC, and the necessary measure of water) for the framework. which are impacted by troublesome circumstances. ii. This framework flows around 104 k gallons of supplement arrangement month to month notwithstanding, just 8-10 L water is polished off by the framework. |
i. The novel direction of the works suggest in the ML related articles are interesting and demand more investigation with proposed system once a large quantity data is collected over the IoT system. ii. The thought and design of the vertical NFT system is careful to be used. |
| 6. | Mohamed, Elsayed Said, et al. “Smart farming for improving agricultural management.” The Egyptian Journal of Remote Sensing and Space Science 24.3 (2021): 971-981. [18] |
The brilliant water system framework incorporated those sensors for checking water level, water system productivity, environment, and so on. Brilliant water system depends on shrewd regulators and sensors as well as a few numerical relations. | The execution of Brilliant Choice Emotionally supportive networks (SDSS) upholds the use of joining IoT with UAV and Robots frameworks constrained by artificial intelligence Methods. ii. The improvement of correspondence innovation and the extended utilization of IoT, the utilization of automated airplane has become vital. |
i. The keen technologies should be maintained at the level of small farms, as they aim to increase production and improve the effective use of land and water resource. ii. Unmanned aircraft faced important challenges that they can fly for a short time are exclusive and have climatic impact. |
| 7. | Tatas, Konstantinos, et al. “iponics: IoT monitoring and control for hydroponics.” 2021 10th International Conference on Modern Circuits and Systems Technologies (MOCAST). IEEE, 2021 [19]. |
This Framework presents the plan, and execution of a wise, minimal expense IoT-based control and observing framework for aquaculture nurseries. | i. The framework is made out of a particular Remote Sensor Organization for observing the fundamental boundaries for Tank-farming and control for the siphon. ii. Provides the nursery manager with an easy to use electronic device to screen his yields as well as cautions and admonitions permitting the perception of various nurseries with negligible exertion and need for mediation. |
i. The system needs more effective water pump control using fuzzy logic. ii. Predicting nutrient values grounded on the original absorptions and the water quality sensor values. |
| 8. | Ramakrishnam Raju, S. V. S., et al. “Design and Implementation of Smart Hydroponics Farming Using IoT-Based AI Controller with Mobile Application System.” Journal of Nanomaterials 2022 (2022). [20] | This article centres around execution of portable application coordinated computerized reasoning based shrewd aquaculture master framework. | The rancher works his aquaculture ranch field in manual mode, guaranteeing that supplements are given to plants at the sums determined by the rancher. Besides, supplements are applied to plants at determined reference levels during mechanized method of activity. | i. This arrangement can be extended with hybrid deep learning manners and optimization approaches. |
| Material | Advantages | Disadvantages | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sand | Financially suitable, great porosity highlights, | High thickness (around of 1500 kg/m3), | [53] |
| Perlite | what’s more, gives great plant support | low maintenance of water, vulnerable to | [54] |
| Vermiculite | Low thickness (around of 90 kg/m3), | salt aggregation | [55] |
| Rockwool Mineral wool | organically dormant, impartial pH, | Costly, low water maintenance limit | [56] |
| Coconut coir/ Coir Peat | profoundly accessible | Costly, energy consuming item | [57] |
| Peat/Peat moss | Low thickness (around 80 kg/m3), | Adverse consequences on human wellbeing when | [58] |
| Pumice | high supplement holding capacity, great water | is reused | [59] |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).