Submitted:
01 September 2024
Posted:
02 September 2024
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Material and Methods
3. Results and Discussion

4. Conclusion
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Asish, P.R.; Dasgupta, S.; Rachel, G.; Bagepally, B.S.; Kumar, C.P.G. Global prevalence of asymptomatic dengue infections - a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2023, 134, 292–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kok, B. H., Lim, H. T., Lim, C. P., Lai, N. S., Leow, C. Y., & Leow, C. H. (2023). Dengue virus infection–a review of pathogenesis, vaccines, diagnosis and therapy. Virus research, 324, 199018.
- Dengue is caused by a family of viruses (Den-1, Den-2, Den-3, and Den-4) primarily transmitted through the bite of an infected mosquito (Aedes aegypti or, less commonly, Aedes albopictus). Following the bite, the virus enters the bloodstream, where it can be detected for approximately 2-7 days. If an infected person is bitten by a second mosquito, it can spread the virus to other individuals by subsequently biting them.
- Adhani, N.R.; Arneliwati, A.; Tampubolon, M.M. The Relationship between Perceptions and Family Behavior in Preventing Dengue Hemorrhagic Fever. Qistina: J. Multidisiplin Indones. 2023, 2, 1398–1406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ho, S.H.; Lim, J.T.; Ong, J.; Hapuarachchi, H.C.; Sim, S.; Ng, L.C. Singapore’s 5 decades of dengue prevention and control—Implications for global dengue control. PLOS Neglected Trop. Dis. 2023, 17, e0011400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Waickman, A.T.; Newell, K.; Endy, T.P.; Thomas, S.J. Biologics for dengue prevention: up-to-date. Expert Opin. Biol. Ther. 2022, 23, 73–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Muthukumaran, R.; Sankararamakrishnan, R. Differences in the Membrane-Binding Properties of Flaviviral Nonstructural 1 (NS1) Protein: Comparative Simulations of Zika and Dengue Virus NS1 Proteins in Explicit Bilayers. ACS Bio Med Chem Au 2024, 4, 137–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Guntamadugu, R.; Ramakrishnan, R.; Darala, G.; Kothandan, S. Molecular docking, simulations of animal peptides against the envelope protein of Dengue virus. J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 2023, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhou, X.; Ling, M.; Lin, Q.; Tang, S.; Wu, J.; Hu, H. Effectiveness Analysis of Multiple Initial States Simulated Annealing Algorithm, a Case Study on the Molecular Docking Tool AutoDock Vina. IEEE/ACM Trans. Comput. Biol. Bioinform. 2023, 20, 3830–3841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ding, J.; Tang, S.; Mei, Z.; Wang, L.; Huang, Q.; Hu, H.; Ling, M.; Wu, J. Vina-GPU 2.0: Further Accelerating AutoDock Vina and Its Derivatives with Graphics Processing Units. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2023, 63, 1982–1998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Houshmand, F., & Houshmand, S. (2023). Potentially highly effective drugs for COVID-19: Virtual screening and molecular docking study through PyRx-Vina Approach. Frontiers in Health Informatics, 12, 150.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).