Submitted:
10 August 2024
Posted:
13 August 2024
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
- Provide an overview of the different biomass conversion technologies applicable in post-disaster scenarios.
- Assess the implementation and effectiveness of biomass energy systems in Puerto Rico post-Hurricane Maria.
- Evaluate the broader impacts of biomass energy on community resilience, economic recovery, and environmental sustainability.
2. Background
2.1. Impact of Hurricane Maria
2.2. Pre-Hurricane Energy Sources and Infrastructure
2.3. Post-Hurricane Energy Restoration Efforts
3. Biomass Conversion Technologies
3.1. Overview of Biomass as an Energy Source
3.2. Conversion Technologies
4. Emergency Energy Solutions
4.1. Immediate Post-Disaster Needs
4.2. Microgrids and Distributed Energy Systems
4.3. Case Study: Arensis Biomass Conversion System
5. Community Impacts
5.1. Economic Benefits
5.2. Environmental Impacts
5.3. Social and Health Impacts
5.4. Community Engagement
6. Policy and Governance
6.1. Regulatory Framework
6.2. Recommendations for Policy Makers
7. Technological Innovations
7.1. Scaling Up and Replicability
7.2. Ongoing Research and Development
8. Conclusions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Barattieri, A.; Borda, P.; Brugnoli, A.; Pelli, M.; Tschopp, J. The Short-Run, Dynamic Employment Effects of Natural Disasters: New Insights from Puerto Rico. Ecological Economics 2023, 205, 107693. [CrossRef]
- Rivera, F.I. Puerto Rico’s Population before and after Hurricane Maria. Popul Environ 2020, 42, 1–3. [CrossRef]
- Kishore, N.; Marqués, D.; Mahmud, A.; Kiang, M.V.; Rodriguez, I.; Fuller, A.; Ebner, P.; Sorensen, C.; Racy, F.; Lemery, J.; et al. Mortality in Puerto Rico after Hurricane Maria. N Engl J Med 2018, 379, 162–170. [CrossRef]
- Antar, M.; Lyu, D.; Nazari, M.; Shah, A.; Zhou, X.; Smith, D.L. Biomass for a Sustainable Bioeconomy: An Overview of World Biomass Production and Utilization. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2021, 139, 110691. [CrossRef]
- Falcone, P.M.; Sica, E. Assessing the Opportunities and Challenges of Green Finance in Italy: An Analysis of the Biomass Production Sector. Sustainability 2019, 11, 517. [CrossRef]
- Joshi, R.; Singla-Pareek, S.L.; Pareek, A. Engineering Abiotic Stress Response in Plants for Biomass Production. Journal of Biological Chemistry 2018, 293, 5035–5043. [CrossRef]
- Martinuzzi, S.; Cook, B.D.; Helmer, E.H.; Keller, M.; Locke, D.H.; Marcano-Vega, H.; Uriarte, M.; Morton, D.C. Patterns and Controls on Island-wide Aboveground Biomass Accumulation in Second-growth Forests of Puerto Rico. Biotropica 2022, 54, 1146–1159. [CrossRef]
- Yaffar, D.; Norby, R.J. A Historical and Comparative Review of 50 Years of Root Data Collection in Puerto Rico. Biotropica 2020, 52, 563–576. [CrossRef]
- Cortés, J. Puerto Rico: Hurricane Maria and the Promise of Disposability. Capitalism Nature Socialism 2018, 29, 1–8. [CrossRef]
- Kwasinski, A.; Andrade, F.; Castro-Sitiriche, M.J.; O’Neill-Carrillo, E. Hurricane Maria Effects on Puerto Rico Electric Power Infrastructure. IEEE Power Energy Technol. Syst. J. 2019, 6, 85–94. [CrossRef]
- Santos-Burgoa, C.; Sandberg, J.; Suárez, E.; Goldman-Hawes, A.; Zeger, S.; Garcia-Meza, A.; Pérez, C.M.; Estrada-Merly, N.; Colón-Ramos, U.; Nazario, C.M.; et al. Differential and Persistent Risk of Excess Mortality from Hurricane Maria in Puerto Rico: A Time-Series Analysis. The Lancet Planetary Health 2018, 2, e478–e488. [CrossRef]
- Simpson, N.P. Accommodating Landscape-Scale Shocks: Lessons on Transition from Cape Town and Puerto Rico. Geoforum 2019, 102, 226–229. [CrossRef]
- De Onís, C.M. Fueling and Delinking from Energy Coloniality in Puerto Rico. Journal of Applied Communication Research 2018, 46, 535–560. [CrossRef]
- Engelman, A.; Guzzardo, M.T.; Antolin Muñiz, M.; Arenas, L.; Gomez, A. Assessing the Emergency Response Role of Community-Based Organizations (CBOs) Serving People with Disabilities and Older Adults in Puerto Rico Post-Hurricane María and during the COVID-19 Pandemic. IJERPH 2022, 19, 2156. [CrossRef]
- Pullen, L.C. Puerto Rico after Hurricane Maria. American Journal of Transplantation 2018, 18, 283–284. [CrossRef]
- Saeed, M.H.; Fangzong, W.; Kalwar, B.A.; Iqbal, S. A Review on Microgrids’ Challenges & Perspectives. IEEE Access 2021, 9, 166502–166517. [CrossRef]
- Dhar, A.; Naeth, M.A.; Jennings, P.D.; Gamal El-Din, M. Perspectives on Environmental Impacts and a Land Reclamation Strategy for Solar and Wind Energy Systems. Science of The Total Environment 2020, 718, 134602. [CrossRef]
- Tun, M.M.; Juchelkova, D.; Win, M.M.; Thu, A.M.; Puchor, T. Biomass Energy: An Overview of Biomass Sources, Energy Potential, and Management in Southeast Asian Countries. Resources 2019, 8, 81. [CrossRef]
- Saghir, M.; Zafar, S.; Tahir, A.; Ouadi, M.; Siddique, B.; Hornung, A. Unlocking the Potential of Biomass Energy in Pakistan. Front. Energy Res. 2019, 7, 24. [CrossRef]
- Rashidi, N.A.; Chai, Y.H.; Yusup, S. Biomass Energy in Malaysia: Current Scenario, Policies, and Implementation Challenges. Bioenerg. Res. 2022, 15, 1371–1386. [CrossRef]
- Pang, S. Advances in Thermochemical Conversion of Woody Biomass to Energy, Fuels and Chemicals. Biotechnology Advances 2019, 37, 589–597. [CrossRef]
- Koul, B.; Yakoob, M.; Shah, M.P. Agricultural Waste Management Strategies for Environmental Sustainability. Environmental Research 2022, 206, 112285. [CrossRef]
- Varjani, S.; Shahbeig, H.; Popat, K.; Patel, Z.; Vyas, S.; Shah, A.V.; Barceló, D.; Hao Ngo, H.; Sonne, C.; Shiung Lam, S.; et al. Sustainable Management of Municipal Solid Waste through Waste-to-Energy Technologies. Bioresource Technology 2022, 355, 127247. [CrossRef]
- Sivabalan, K.; Hassan, S.; Ya, H.; Pasupuleti, J. A Review on the Characteristic of Biomass and Classification of Bioenergy through Direct Combustion and Gasification as an Alternative Power Supply. J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 2021, 1831, 012033. [CrossRef]
- Li, J.; Gan, C.; Zhou, J.; Novakovic, V. Performance Analysis of Biomass Direct Combustion Heating and Centralized Biogas Supply System for Rural Districts in China. Energy Conversion and Management 2023, 278, 116730. [CrossRef]
- Safarian, S.; Unnþórsson, R.; Richter, C. A Review of Biomass Gasification Modelling. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2019, 110, 378–391. [CrossRef]
- Laboy-Nieves, E. Energy Recovery from Scrap Tires: A Sustainable Option for Small Islands like Puerto Rico. Sustainability 2014, 6, 3105–3121. [CrossRef]
- Ahmad, F.; Silva, E.L.; Varesche, M.B.A. Hydrothermal Processing of Biomass for Anaerobic Digestion – A Review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2018, 98, 108–124. [CrossRef]
- Rodríguez-Nuñez, J.R.; Castillo Baltazar, O.S. Anaerobic Digestion Technology for Management of Organic Wastes: Latin American Context. In Biogas Production; Balagurusamy, N., Chandel, A.K., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, 2020; pp. 39–55 ISBN 978-3-030-58826-7.
- Dhyani, V.; Bhaskar, T. Pyrolysis of Biomass. In Biofuels: Alternative Feedstocks and Conversion Processes for the Production of Liquid and Gaseous Biofuels; Elsevier, 2019; pp. 217–244 ISBN 978-0-12-816856-1.
- Ighalo, J.O.; Iwuchukwu, F.U.; Eyankware, O.E.; Iwuozor, K.O.; Olotu, K.; Bright, O.C.; Igwegbe, C.A. Flash Pyrolysis of Biomass: A Review of Recent Advances. Clean Techn Environ Policy 2022, 24, 2349–2363. [CrossRef]
- Olatomiwa, L.; Blanchard, R.; Mekhilef, S.; Akinyele, D. Hybrid Renewable Energy Supply for Rural Healthcare Facilities: An Approach to Quality Healthcare Delivery. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments 2018, 30, 121–138. [CrossRef]
- Joseph, S.R.; Voyles, C.; Williams, K.D.; Smith, E.; Chilton, M. Colonial Neglect and the Right to Health in Puerto Rico After Hurricane Maria. Am J Public Health 2020, 110, 1512–1518. [CrossRef]
- Joshipura, K.J.; Martínez-Lozano, M.; Ríos-Jiménez, P.I.; Camacho-Monclova, D.M.; Noboa-Ramos, C.; Alvarado-González, G.A.; Lowe, S.R. Preparedness, Hurricanes Irma and Maria, and Impact on Health in Puerto Rico. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 2022, 67, 102657. [CrossRef]
- Gital, Y.; Bilgen, B. Resilient Strategies for Managing Supply and Facility Disruptions in a Biomass Supply Chain. Applied Energy 2024, 372, 123808. [CrossRef]
- Lopes, J.A.P.; Madureira, A.G.; Moreira, C. A View of Microgrids. In Advances in Energy Systems; Lund, P.D., Byrne, J., Haas, R., Flynn, D., Eds.; Wiley, 2019; pp. 149–166 ISBN 978-1-119-50828-1.
- Massol Gonz�lez, A. Casa Pueblo: A Puerto Rican Model of Self-Governance; Lever Press: Ann Arbor, MI, 2022; ISBN 978-1-64315-034-5.
- Wallsgrove, R.; Woo, J.; Lee, J.-H.; Akiba, L. The Emerging Potential of Microgrids in the Transition to 100% Renewable Energy Systems. Energies 2021, 14, 1687. [CrossRef]
- Jeffers, R.; Baca, M.; Wachtel, A.; DeRosa, S.; Staid, A.; Fogleman, W.; Outkin, A.; Currie, F. Analysis of Microgrid Locations Benefitting Community Resilience for Puerto Rico; 2018; p. SAND--2018-11145, 1530167, 669609;
- Doukas, H.; Spiliotis, E.; Jafari, M.A.; Giarola, S.; Nikas, A. Low-Cost Emissions Cuts in Container Shipping: Thinking inside the Box. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 2021, 94, 102815. [CrossRef]
- Drożdż, W.; Bilan, Y.; Rabe, M.; Streimikiene, D.; Pilecki, B. Optimizing Biomass Energy Production at the Municipal Level to Move to Low-Carbon Energy. Sustainable Cities and Society 2022, 76, 103417. [CrossRef]
- Hung, N.T. Effect of Economic Indicators, Biomass Energy on Human Development in China. Energy & Environment 2022, 33, 829–852. [CrossRef]
- Sri Shalini S.; Palanivelu K.; Ramachandran A.; Raghavan, V. Biochar from Biomass Waste as a Renewable Carbon Material for Climate Change Mitigation in Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions—a Review. Biomass Conv. Bioref. 2021, 11, 2247–2267. [CrossRef]
- Yang, Q.; Zhou, H.; Zhang, X.; Nielsen, C.P.; Li, J.; Lu, X.; Yanga, H.; Chen, H. Hybrid Life-Cycle Assessment for Energy Consumption and Greenhouse Gas Emissions of a Typical Biomass Gasification Power Plant in China. Journal of Cleaner Production 2018, 205, 661–671. [CrossRef]
- Kant Bhatia, S.; Palai, A.K.; Kumar, A.; Kant Bhatia, R.; Kumar Patel, A.; Kumar Thakur, V.; Yang, Y.-H. Trends in Renewable Energy Production Employing Biomass-Based Biochar. Bioresource Technology 2021, 340, 125644. [CrossRef]
- Tezer, Ö.; Karabağ, N.; Öngen, A.; Çolpan, C.Ö.; Ayol, A. Biomass Gasification for Sustainable Energy Production: A Review. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 2022, 47, 15419–15433. [CrossRef]
- Saleem, M. Possibility of Utilizing Agriculture Biomass as a Renewable and Sustainable Future Energy Source. Heliyon 2022, 8, e08905. [CrossRef]
- Cavalaglio, G.; Cotana, F.; Nicolini, A.; Coccia, V.; Petrozzi, A.; Formica, A.; Bertini, A. Characterization of Various Biomass Feedstock Suitable for Small-Scale Energy Plants as Preliminary Activity of Biocheaper Project. Sustainability 2020, 12, 6678. [CrossRef]
- Baggu, M.; Burton, R.; Blair, N.; Sengupta, M.; Harris, T.; Barrows, C.; Sky, H.; Gevorgian, V.; Keen, J.; Smith, E.; et al. Puerto Rico Grid Resilience and Transitions to 100% Renewable Energy Study (PR100) (Summary Report); 2024; p. NREL/TP--6A20-88615, 2301688, MainId:89394;
- Kim, J.E.; Tang, T. Preventing Early Lock-in with Technology-Specific Policy Designs: The Renewable Portfolio Standards and Diversity in Renewable Energy Technologies. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2020, 123, 109738. [CrossRef]
- Jayarathna, L.; Kent, G.; O’Hara, I.; Hobson, P. A Geographical Information System Based Framework to Identify Optimal Location and Size of Biomass Energy Plants Using Single or Multiple Biomass Types. Applied Energy 2020, 275, 115398. [CrossRef]
- Azevedo, S.G.; Sequeira, T.; Santos, M.; Mendes, L. Biomass-Related Sustainability: A Review of the Literature and Interpretive Structural Modeling. Energy 2019, 171, 1107–1125. [CrossRef]
- Oyekale, J.; Petrollese, M.; Tola, V.; Cau, G. Impacts of Renewable Energy Resources on Effectiveness of Grid-Integrated Systems: Succinct Review of Current Challenges and Potential Solution Strategies. Energies 2020, 13, 4856. [CrossRef]
- Umakanth, A.V.; Datta, A.; Reddy, B.S.; Bardhan, S. Biomass Feedstocks for Advanced Biofuels: Sustainability and Supply Chain Management. In Advanced Biofuel Technologies; Elsevier, 2022; pp. 39–72 ISBN 978-0-323-88427-3.
- Uddin, M.N.; Techato, K.; Taweekun, J.; Rahman, M.M.; Rasul, M.G.; Mahlia, T.M.I.; Ashrafur, S.M. An Overview of Recent Developments in Biomass Pyrolysis Technologies. Energies 2018, 11, 3115. [CrossRef]
- Siddique, M.; Akram, S.; Liaqat, Z.; Mushtaq, M. Thermal/Photocatalytic Conversion of Sewage Sludge and Biomass to Energy. In Sewage and Biomass from Wastewater to Energy; Inamuddin, Altalhi, T., Luqman, M., Kapuku, J., Eds.; Wiley, 2024; pp. 1–41 ISBN 978-1-394-20431-1.
- Hirani, A.H.; Javed, N.; Asif, M.; Basu, S.K.; Kumar, A. A Review on First- and Second-Generation Biofuel Productions. In Biofuels: Greenhouse Gas Mitigation and Global Warming; Kumar, A., Ogita, S., Yau, Y.-Y., Eds.; Springer India: New Delhi, 2018; pp. 141–154 ISBN 978-81-322-3761-7.
- Rahman, A.; Agrawal, S.; Nawaz, T.; Pan, S.; Selvaratnam, T. A Review of Algae-Based Produced Water Treatment for Biomass and Biofuel Production. Water 2020, 12, 2351. [CrossRef]
- Pal, D.B.; Singh, A.; Bhatnagar, A. A Review on Biomass Based Hydrogen Production Technologies. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 2022, 47, 1461–1480. [CrossRef]
- Obileke, K.; Makaka, G.; Nwokolo, N. Recent Advancements in Anaerobic Digestion and Gasification Technology. Applied Sciences 2023, 13, 5597. [CrossRef]
- Wang, Z.; Dien, B.S.; Rausch, K.D.; Tumbleson, M.E.; Singh, V. Improving Ethanol Yields with Deacetylated and Two-Stage Pretreated Corn Stover and Sugarcane Bagasse by Blending Commercial Xylose-Fermenting and Wild Type Saccharomyces Yeast. Bioresource Technology 2019, 282, 103–109. [CrossRef]
- Efroymson, R.A.; Jager, H.I.; Mandal, S.; Parish, E.S.; Mathews, T.J. Better Management Practices for Environmentally Sustainable Production of Microalgae and Algal Biofuels. Journal of Cleaner Production 2021, 289, 125150. [CrossRef]
- Panoutsou, C.; Singh, A. A Value Chain Approach to Improve Biomass Policy Formation. GCB Bioenergy 2020, 12, 464–475. [CrossRef]
- Hoang, A.T.; Pham, V.V.; Nguyen, X.P. Integrating Renewable Sources into Energy System for Smart City as a Sagacious Strategy towards Clean and Sustainable Process. Journal of Cleaner Production 2021, 305, 127161. [CrossRef]
- Horstink, L.; Wittmayer, J.M.; Ng, K.; Luz, G.P.; Marín-González, E.; Gährs, S.; Campos, I.; Holstenkamp, L.; Oxenaar, S.; Brown, D. Collective Renewable Energy Prosumers and the Promises of the Energy Union: Taking Stock. Energies 2020, 13, 421. [CrossRef]
- Adams, P.; Bridgwater, T.; Lea-Langton, A.; Ross, A.; Watson, I. Biomass Conversion Technologies. In Greenhouse Gases Balances of Bioenergy Systems; Elsevier, 2018; pp. 107–139 ISBN 978-0-08-101036-5.
- Saini, J.K.; Himanshu, .; Hemansi, .; Kaur, A.; Mathur, A. Strategies to Enhance Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Lignocellulosic Biomass for Biorefinery Applications: A Review. Bioresource Technology 2022, 360, 127517. [CrossRef]
- Wu, Y.; Wang, H.; Li, H.; Han, X.; Zhang, M.; Sun, Y.; Fan, X.; Tu, R.; Zeng, Y.; Xu, C.C.; et al. Applications of Catalysts in Thermochemical Conversion of Biomass (Pyrolysis, Hydrothermal Liquefaction and Gasification): A Critical Review. Renewable Energy 2022, 196, 462–481. [CrossRef]
- Jha, S.; Okolie, J.A.; Nanda, S.; Dalai, A.K. A Review of Biomass Resources and Thermochemical Conversion Technologies. Chem Eng & Technol 2022, 45, 791–799. [CrossRef]
- Brandon, A.G.; Scheller, H.V. Engineering of Bioenergy Crops: Dominant Genetic Approaches to Improve Polysaccharide Properties and Composition in Biomass. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 282. [CrossRef]
- Lewandowski, I.; Von Cossel, M.; Winkler, B.; Bauerle, A.; Gaudet, N.; Kiesel, A.; Lewin, E.; Magenau, E.; Marting Vidaurre, N.A.; Müller, B.; et al. An Adapted Indicator Framework for Evaluating the Potential Contribution of Bioeconomy Approaches to Agricultural Systems Resilience. Advanced Sustainable Systems 2024, 8, 2300518. [CrossRef]
- Wang, K.; Tester, J.W. Sustainable Management of Unavoidable Biomass Wastes. Green Energy and Resources 2023, 1, 100005. [CrossRef]
- De Paulo Gewehr, L.L.; Deggau, A.B.; Da Silva Neiva, S.; De Andrade Guerra, J.B.S.O. Resilience in the Context of Climate Change. In Sustainable Cities and Communities; Leal Filho, W., Marisa Azul, A., Brandli, L., Gökçin Özuyar, P., Wall, T., Eds.; Encyclopedia of the UN Sustainable Development Goals; Springer International Publishing: Cham, 2020; pp. 528–539 ISBN 978-3-319-95716-6.






| Aspect | Advantages | Challenges |
|---|---|---|
| Renewable | Biomass is a renewable energy source as it comes from organic materials that can be replenished, ensuring a sustainable supply [19,20,21,22,23]. | Biomass resources require continuous growth and cultivation, which can be influenced by seasonal and climatic variations [19,20,21,22,23]. |
| Carbon Neutral | Biomass, when sustainably managed, contributes to a closed carbon cycle, as the CO2 released during combustion is offset by the CO2 absorbed during biomass growth, aiding climate change mitigation [20]. | Unsustainable practices can disrupt the carbon cycle, leading to net CO2 emissions. Monitoring and management are necessary to maintain neutrality [20]. |
| Versatile | Biomass can be converted into multiple energy forms such as heat, electricity, and biofuels, making it applicable for residential heating, power generation, and transportation fuels [21]. | The efficiency and scalability of biomass conversion technologies can vary, and not all forms of biomass can be easily processed into desired energy forms [21]. |
| Waste Reduction | Utilization of waste materials for biomass energy reduces landfill volumes and enhances waste management practices, minimizing environmental impacts [22]. | The availability and consistency of waste biomass materials can fluctuate, affecting energy production reliability [22]. |
| Collection and Transportation | Biomass, despite being bulky, provides local employment opportunities in collection and transport, and can utilize existing infrastructure [23]. | The logistical challenges and costs associated with collecting and transporting bulky biomass materials, coupled with their lower energy density, make this process less efficient compared to fossil fuels [23]. |
| Efficiency | Advanced biomass technologies are being developed to improve conversion efficiency, offering potential for increased energy output [19,21]. | Many current biomass conversion processes, such as direct combustion and anaerobic digestion, have lower energy efficiency compared to conventional fossil fuel systems [19,21]. |
| Land Use | Biomass production can be integrated with agricultural systems, potentially improving land productivity and biodiversity [20,22]. | Large-scale production can compete with food crops for land, raising concerns about food security and land availability. Careful management is required to balance these needs [20,22]. |
| Environmental Impact | Sustainable biomass practices can enhance soil quality and biodiversity if managed correctly, contributing to environmental conservation [19,21,22,23]. | Improper management can lead to negative environmental impacts such as deforestation, soil degradation, and loss of biodiversity, necessitating strict sustainability measures [19,21,22,23]. |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).