Submitted:
01 July 2024
Posted:
02 July 2024
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Ethics
2.2. Participants
- Knee extension- (ExtAF-average extension force obtained from 3 measurements, ExtMF- maximum extension force)-standing position (QUAD), 3 contractions of 5 seconds each, 30-second break using a ForceFrame dynamometer.
- Knee flexion- ( FlexAF average flexion force obtained from 3 measurements, FlexMF maximum flexion force)- standing position (HAM) 3 contractions of 5 seconds each, 30 second break using ForceFrame dynamometer.
2.3.1. Isometric Strength Assessment
2.4. Description of Intervention
2.5. Statistical Analysis
3. Results
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Askling, C.M.; Tengvar, M.; Tarassova, O.; Thorstensson, A. Acute Hamstring Injuries in Swedish Elite Sprinters and Jumpers: A Prospective Randomised Controlled Clinical Trial Comparing Two Rehabilitation Protocols. Br J Sports Med 2014, 48, 532–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- López-Valenciano, A.; Ruiz-Pérez, I.; Garcia-Gómez, A.; Vera-Garcia, F.J.; De Ste Croix, M.; Myer, G.D.; Ayala, F. Epidemiology of Injuries in Professional Football: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Br J Sports Med 2020, 54, 711–718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chavarro-Nieto, C.; Beaven, M.; Gill, N.; Hébert-Losier, K. Hamstrings Injury Incidence, Risk Factors, and Prevention in Rugby Union Players: A Systematic Review. The Physician and Sportsmedicine 2023, 51, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mersmann, F.; Bohm, S.; Arampatzis, A. Imbalances in the Development of Muscle and Tendon as Risk Factor for Tendinopathies in Youth Athletes: A Review of Current Evidence and Concepts of Prevention. Front. Physiol. 2017, 8, 987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kellis, E.; Sahinis, C.; Baltzopoulos, V. Is Hamstrings-to-Quadriceps Torque Ratio Useful for Predicting Anterior Cruciate Ligament and Hamstring Injuries? A Systematic and Critical Review. Journal of Sport and Health Science 2023, 12, 343–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pietraszewski, P.; Golas, A.; Matusinski, A.; Mrzygłód, S.; Mostowik, A.; Maszczyk, A. Muscle Activity Asymmetry of the Lower Limbs During Sprinting in Elite Soccer Players. Journal of Human Kinetics 2020, 75, 239–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mandroukas, A.; Michailidis, Y.; Metaxas, T. Muscle Strength and Hamstrings to Quadriceps Ratio in Young Soccer Players: A Cross-Sectional Study. JFMK 2023, 8, 70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Croisier, J.-L.; Ganteaume, S.; Binet, J.; Genty, M.; Ferret, J.-M. Strength Imbalances and Prevention of Hamstring Injury in Professional Soccer Players: A Prospective Study. Am J Sports Med 2008, 36, 1469–1475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cuthbert, M.; Ripley, N.; McMahon, J.J.; Evans, M.; Haff, G.G.; Comfort, P. The Effect of Nordic Hamstring Exercise Intervention Volume on Eccentric Strength and Muscle Architecture Adaptations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses. Sports Med 2020, 50, 83–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- McCall, A.; Carling, C.; Davison, M.; Nedelec, M.; Le Gall, F.; Berthoin, S.; Dupont, G. Injury Risk Factors, Screening Tests and Preventative Strategies: A Systematic Review of the Evidence That Underpins the Perceptions and Practices of 44 Football (Soccer) Teams from Various Premier Leagues. Br J Sports Med 2015, 49, 583–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mjølsnes, R.; Arnason, A.; Østhagen, T.; Raastad, T.; Bahr, R. A 10-week Randomized Trial Comparing Eccentric vs. Concentric Hamstring Strength Training in Well-trained Soccer Players. Scandinavian Med Sci Sports 2004, 14, 311–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Van Der Horst, N.; Smits, D.-W.; Petersen, J.; Goedhart, E.A.; Backx, F.J.G. The Preventive Effect of the Nordic Hamstring Exercise on Hamstring Injuries in Amateur Soccer Players: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Am J Sports Med 2015, 43, 1316–1323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kaminski, T.W.; Wabbersen, C.V.; Murphy, R.M. Concentric versus Enhanced Eccentric Hamstring Strength Training: Clinical Implications. J Athl Train 1998, 33, 216–221. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Sadigursky, D.; Braid, J.A.; De Lira, D.N.L.; Machado, B.A.B.; Carneiro, R.J.F.; Colavolpe, P.O. The FIFA 11+ Injury Prevention Program for Soccer Players: A Systematic Review. BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil 2017, 9, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kadlec, D.; Jordan, M.J.; Snyder, L.; Alderson, J.; Nimphius, S. Re-Test Reliability of Single and Multijoint Strength Properties in Female Australian Footballers. Sports Med - Open 2021, 7, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ardern, C.L.; Pizzari, T.; Wollin, M.R.; Webster, K.E. Hamstrings Strength Imbalance in Professional Football (Soccer) Players in Australia. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research 2015, 29, 997–1002. 17 (17) https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06325228?tab=table#administrative-information. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Fallentin, N.; Jrgensen, K.; Simonsen, E.B. Motor Unit Recruitment during Prolonged Isometric Contractions. Eur J Appl Physiol 1993, 67, 335–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kong, P.W.; Burns, S.F. Bilateral Difference in Hamstrings to Quadriceps Ratio in Healthy Males and Females. Physical Therapy in Sport 2010, 11, 12–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]

| Testing Time | Study Group1 | Control Group1 | Difference between groups2 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ExtAF | ||||
| Before | 301.08 (252.41-349.74) | 352.33 (307.39-397.26) | -51.25 (-114.73-12.23), p=0.11 | |
| After | 315.52 (273.78-357.26) | 334.15 (265.59-402.72) | -18.63 (-96.23-58.97), p=0.625 | |
| ExtMF | ||||
| Before | 362.99 (267.63-458.36) | 373.65 (328.33-418.96) | -10.66 (-113.54-92.23), p=0.832 | |
| After | 338.66 (291.95-385.36) | 352.47 (279.92-425.02) | -13.81 (-97.09-69.46), p=0.736 | |
| FlexAF | ||||
| Before | 196 (170.65-221.35) | 233.35 (188.23-278.48) | -37.35 (-87.51-12.81), p=0.137 | |
| After | 199.03 (177.63-220.43) | 195.89 (149.75-242.04) | 3.14 (-46.47-52.74), p=0.897 | |
| FlexMF | ||||
| Before | 196 (170.65-221.35) | 252.52 (206.48-298.55) | -56.52 (-107.48--5.55), p=0.0312 | |
| After | 213.03 (192.4-233.66) | 211.66 (164.01-259.32) | 1.37 (-49.38-52.12), p=0.956 | |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).