Submitted:
10 June 2024
Posted:
11 June 2024
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
3. Results
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Global Cancer Observatory: Cancer Today. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer. Available online: https://gco.iarc.fr/today (accessed on 20 November 2023).
- Yamano T, Semba S, Noda M, Yoshimura M, Kobayashi M, Hamanaka M, Beppu N, Yano A, Tsukamoto K, Matsubara N, Tomita N. Prognostic significance of classified extramural tumor deposits and extracapsular lymph node invasion in T3-4 colorectal cancer: a retrospective single-center study. BMC Cancer. 2015;15:859.
- Wind J, Lagarde SM, Ten Kate FJ, Ubbink DT, Bemelman WA, van Lanschot JJ. A systematic review on the significance of extracapsular lymph node involvement in gastrointestinal malignancies. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2007;33(4):401-8.
- Veronese N, Nottegar A, Pea A, Solmi M, Stubbs B, Capelli P, Sergi G, Manzato E, Fassan M, Wood LD, Scarpa A, Luchini C. Prognostic impact and implications of extracapsular lymph node involvement in colorectal cancer: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Ann Oncol. 2016;27(1):42-8.
- Li T, Yang Y, Wu W, Fu Z, Cheng F, Qiu J, Li Q, Zhang K, Luo Z, Qiu Z, Huang C. Prognostic implications of ENE and LODDS in relation to lymph node-positive colorectal cancer location. Transl Oncol. 2021;14(11):101190.
- Puppa G, Maisonneuve P, Sonzogni A, Masullo M, Capelli P, Chilosi M, Menestrina F, Viale G, Pelosi G. Pathological assessment of pericolonic tumor deposits in advanced colonic carcinoma: relevance to prognosis and tumor staging. Mod Pathol. 2007;20(8):843-55.
| Variable | No-matted nodes n=208 |
matted nodes n=47 |
p-value * |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sex, n %) Female Male |
138 (52.7) 124 (47.3) |
61 (50) 61 (50) |
.626 |
| Age (years)–Median (IQR) | 58 (48–68) | 58 (48–69) | .695 |
| Location - N (%) Right Left |
132 (63.5) 76 (36.5) |
37 (78.7) 10 (21.3) |
.080 |
| Tumoral diameter (mm), Median (IQR) | 57 (40–80) | 60 (50–80) | .186 |
| Resected lymph nodes, Median (IQR) | 24 (18–32) | 23 (18–32) | .959 |
| Metastatic lymph nodes, Median (IQR) | 3 (1–6) | 6 (4–8) | <.001 |
| Histologic grade, n (%) 1 2 3 |
19 (9.1) 98 (47.1) 91 (43.8) |
2 (4.3) 25 (53.2) 20 (42.5) |
.493 |
| Lymph node status, n (%) pN1 pN2 |
118 (56.7) 90 (43.3) |
4 (8.5) 43 (91.5) |
<.001 |
| Clinical stage, n (%) Stage III Stage IV |
137 (65.9) 71 (34.1) |
28 (59.6) 19 (40.4) |
.415 |
| Lymphovascular invasion. n (%) No Yes |
85 (40.9) 123 (59.1) |
11 (23.4) 36 (76.6) |
.026 |
| Venous invasion, n (%) No Yes |
132 (63.5) 76 (36.5) |
33 (70.2) 14 (29.8) |
.382 |
| Perineural invasion, n (%) No Yes |
126 (60.6) 82 (39.4) |
28 (59.6) 19 (40.4) |
.899 |
| Surgical margins, n (%) Negative Positive |
198 (95.2) 10 (4.8) |
46 (97.9) 1 (2.1) |
.414 |
| Outcome, n (%) Alive Dead |
140 (67.3) 68 (32.7) |
25 (53.2) 22 (46.8) |
.097 |
| Adjuvance, N (%) No Yes |
34 (16.3) 174 (83.7) |
7 (14.9) 40 (85.1) |
.807 |
| Subtype Not otherwise specified Mucinous Other |
94 (45.2) 37 (17.8) 77 (5.8) |
24 (51.1) 6 (12.8) 17 (36.2) |
.823 |
| Variable | 5- year overall survival (%) | p-value * |
|---|---|---|
| Sex Female Male |
53.8 61.7 |
.066 |
| Location Right Left |
57.9 57.7 |
.556 |
| Histologic grade 1 2 3 |
78.6 55.9 54.9 |
.162 |
| Lymph node status pN1 pN2 |
69.9 45.7 |
<.001 |
| Clinical stage Stage III Stage IV |
71.0 28.1 |
<.001 |
| Lymphovascular invasion. No Yes |
69.4 50.4 |
.004 |
| Venous invasion No Yes |
63.6 45.7 |
.034 |
| Perineural invasion No Yes |
65.8 44.9 |
.005 |
| Surgical margins Negative Positive |
58.8 34.3 |
.242 |
| Adjuvance No Yes |
37.9 61.5 |
<.001 |
| Matted nodes No. Yes |
60 47.7 |
.096 |
| Variable | Chi square value | Hazard ratio (95% confidence intervale) | p-value * |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clinical stage (III vs IV) | 24.509 | 3.104 (1.982-4.859) | <.001 |
| Adjuvance (No vs Yes) | 23.422 | .272 (.161-.461) | <.001 |
| Lymph node status (pN1 vs pN2) | 3.582 | 1.602 (.983-2.610) | .058 |
| Lymphovascular invasion (No vs Yes) | 3.157 | 1.669 (.949-2.936) | .076 |
| Matted nodes (No vs Yes) | .805 | 1.278 (.748-2.186) | .369 |
| Perineural invasion (No vs Yes) | .387 | 1.162 (.724-1.864) | .534 |
| Venous invasion (No vs Yes) | .050 | .945 (.575-1.553) | .823 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).