1. Introduction
Construction is one of the oldest known activities in humanity. The production and application of concrete for use in buildings is present throughout the planet, regardless of the economic and geographical condition of each country, having in its composition the Portland cement, which is the second most consumed material in the world, behind only water (1). Thus, considering its high consumption, research seeks for long years to evaluate various conditions of technological performance (2), durability (3), potential for application of new materials (4), and issues related to its sustainability (5) materials, such as concrete and mortars. Construction and demolition waste is one of the main sources of production of recycled aggregates worldwide, due to its high availability and compatibility (6), (7).
Currently, focusing on the preservation of the environment intensified the reuse of solid waste in construction requiring regulations that sustain and guide the procedures for proper disposal and reuse of waste. The reuse directly ensures the reduction of extraction of natural resources. It is estimated that civil construction consumes between 14% and 50% of the available natural resources on the planet (8).
Numerous studies have been developed to evaluate the use of recycled aggregates in construction. It is a consensus in the scientific community that the generation of construction and demolition waste is considered unsustainable activity, because it causes constant deterioration to the environment. Up to 48% of total municipal solid waste generated on a global scale is estimated (9). The growth of the construction industry has considerably increased the consumption of natural raw materials and the production of waste, intensifying problems derived from inadequate procedures, such as the uncontrolled disposal of this waste in large cities (10). In Brazil, for example, construction companies are responsible for 52% of the civil construction waste generated, while the rest is generated informally. In addition, because they are bulky and high density materials, the disposal of construction waste generates a great environmental impact, irreversible (11).
Construction and demolition waste (class A) have become increasingly one of the targets of the technical-scientific environment, using it as an aggregate for numerous uses in construction and other (12). The use of this waste becomes an important tool in combating environmental degradation, directly and indirectly, by reducing the consumption of inputs from civil construction from the process of crushing rocks, gravel and artificial sand. And, on the other hand, through recycling not only adds value to the final product but also reinserts a material would be disposed in landfills for many years.
Studies have found that materials produced with recycled aggregates meet the required standards and specifications. Although, in several cases, there is a decrease in mechanical strength from substitution above 30%, with exceptions (13). Research shows improvement in the mechanical properties of these materials with the use of recycled aggregate. It was observed an increase in the compressive strength of concrete blocks with recycled small aggregates when compared to the reference blocks (14). They justified these best results by the presence of non-hydrated cement particles in the recycled aggregate, which could contribute to a better connection between the cement paste and the aggregates, due to its greater porosity. Other studies observed the mechanical performance of concrete produced with recycled aggregates and obtained similar results (15).
On the other hand, the type of recycled aggregate affects the performance of materials differently. Thus, (16) highlighted an increase in impact resistance when recycled coarse aggregates were used in concrete blocks. They also pointed out that the incorporation of recycled fine aggregates from construction and demolition waste can increase the mechanical strength of concrete due to the particles of non-hydrated cement in the recycled material. Remembering that the loss of mechanical strength is a limiting factor for the use of recycled aggregates and is greater when the water/cement ratio is lower. Notwithstanding the above, some authors justified the increase of compressive strength in concretes with recycled fine aggregates due to the pozzolanic effect of fine particles.
The higher content of fines in recycled aggregates can improve the transition zone between the cementitious matrix and the aggregate, which contributes to greater concrete compaction. Second (17) fine particles provide better packaging. As the recycled aggregate has greater absorption promotes greater adhesion between the cement paste and the aggregate, through the absorption of the paste and the precipitation of the hydration crystals in the pores of the aggregate. The presence of old mortar particles adhered to the grains of the recycled aggregate is a relevant characteristic that affects the behavior of the concrete, this presence can correlate a higher water absorption, higher porosity and lower resistance of the recycled concrete (18).
The use of recycled aggregates in paving is the best accepted alternative in the technical environment (19). The simplest form of recycling is the application of the rubble in the form of running gravel, on bases, sub-bases and primary paving coatings. The use of construction and demolition waste in the base layers, sub-base and primary coating, have numerous advantages and have significantly lower construction cost than those produced with graded gravel or added to the soil (20).
Artificial rocks are innovative materials that are manufactured with a polymer resin and a high percentage of natural aggregates, which can be replaced to some extent by waste. The mechanical properties of artificial rock surpass natural stones, since the use of resin in their production results in a less porous material, with a lower water absorption rate and better mechanical strength, making them suitable for more demanding applications, as as floors and walls (21,22).
Artificial rock is highly attractive for domestic environments due to its variety and consistency of colors and resistance to scratches, chips and stains. The popularity of artificial rock has increased rapidly worldwide. When analyzing the Brazilian market for ornamental stones, ABIROCHA (23) shows that imports of artificial rocks are twice as large as imports of natural stones, according to
Figure 1, pointing out their incipience and highlighting the relevance of research conducted in this area, for the development of new materials for the Brazilian market.
However, it is deficient studies that seek to use the waste of civil construction and demolition in the elaboration of artificial rocks for use as finishing: kitchen and bathroom countertops, stair cladding and others; replacing natural (ornamental) rocks and even several artificial rocks commercialized today. Due to this scenario, this research seeks this niche; replace, in the production of artificial rocks, the standard raw material (waste of ornamental stones) by construction and demolition waste; results compared to numerous studies already developed in the area of artificial rocks. The choice of a thermosetting orthophthalic polyester resin for the polymer matrix occurred due to the relation: cost benefit. The resins produced with orthophthalic anhydride, that is, the so-called orthophthalic, are applied in most cases due to their low cost, although they have limited thermal stability and chemical resistance (24). Thus, its low cost combined with the primary conditions of mechanical, physical and chemical resistance were initially perfect for research.
A guiding study on artificial rocks was conducted in Taiwan (25), where it was presented results of the production of artificial stone slabs using glass waste, stone fragments and vacuum vibratory compaction. This research elaborated artificial stone plates with unsaturated polymer resin, glass powder and fine granite aggregates. The tests showed the composition with 50% glass powder and 50% granite aggregates with better results: compression (148.8 MPa), water absorption (below 0.02%), density (2,.45) and bending (51.1 MPa). In Turkey in 2018, a survey produced and characterized a polymer matrix composite hybrid (26). O composite elaborated by this research made use of epoxy resin, fiberglass and granite residue that went through mixer in propeller with vacuum and were poured into silicone mold. The composition called F5505 with 40% resin, 55% granite and 5% fiberglass obtained the best results in terms of high theoretical density, hardness, flexural strength, bending modulus and impact strength. Malaysia 2020, another research characterized and evaluated dolomite and kaolin as charge in Poly art marble properties. Twelve types of composition were molded with different percentages of polyester resin, dolomite and kaolin. The best results pointed to 3 types of compositions: D60K15 (resin 25% + Dolomite 60% + Kaolin 15%) better water absorption (0.11%); D60K10 (resin 30% + Dolomite 60% + Kaolin 10%) better compression (105.43 MPa) and flexion (34.1 MPa); D70% (resin + Dolomite 70%) best result for hardness Barcol (27).
Among the negative impacts of the large amount of CDW generated is the rapid occupation of landfills for the accommodation of waste in the environment, being the illegal dumping often used worldwide, such as China, Malaysia, Hong Kong, Israel and Brazil. Big cities like Shenzhen (China) and Chennai (India) and parents like Sri Lanka, were seriously affected by disastrous events due to the inadequate disposal of construction waste (28). This shows that the environmentally adequate disposal of waste is a challenge that grows due to economic development, a problem that affects even developed countries in Europe, where the results of waste management plans, differ depending on the quality of their implementation (29). The amount of CDW is a significant portion of municipal solid waste, studies by several authors, including: (30) e (31) show that there are concerns worldwide relating to the CDW with public policies, whether by economic, social or environmental bias.
In Brazil, about 48 million tons of construction and demolition waste (CDW) were produced in 2021, according to the Solid Waste Panorama in Brazil, published by the Brazilian Association of Public Cleaning Companies and Special Waste (32), that means 38.4 million tons could be recycled or reused. This same study shows that between 10% and 30% of the construction materials purchased for the work are discarded. This means that 10% to 30% of the investment made in construction is wasted. It pays to acquire, transport, break, collect and remove.
According to information from the Brazilian Association for the Recycling of Civil Construction and Demolition Waste, it is estimated that in 2021 520kg of waste per inhabitant per day was produced, however, of about 290.5 tons of rubble generated daily in the country, only 21% are recycled (33).
The recycling of solid construction waste varies depending on the waste that will be treated. This research addresses the Solid Waste Recycling of Civil Construction and Construction and Demolition Waste, established by resolution CONAMA 307, Class A waste (reusable or recyclable waste such as building aggregates, demolition, repairs and renovations of buildings, ceramic components, bricks, blocks, tiles, mortar and concrete, paving and precast) (34).
The recycling of construction waste has advantages related to environmental, technological and economic spheres. Among the advantages, include the reuse of materials, reducing the use of non-renewable resources; the reduction of inadequate disposal; the processing of products; and savings in replacing the purchase of natural raw material.
Considering the high use of concrete worldwide, the demand for aggregates of different diameters extracted from natural rocks and/or river beds (sand and gravel), causes a number of environmental damage, waste from this production chain. Moreover, in the not-so-distant future, the scarcity of these natural resources is evident, which will certainly cause serious economic damage, especially to developing countries such as Brazil.
More than cost efficiency, recycling contributes to the industry’s environmental goals. The 2022 Global Status Report for Buildings and Construction, United Nations Environment Program (35), points out that carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions in the sector hit a record 10 billion tons in 2021, 5% higher than in the previous year. The International Energy Agency’s Global Status Report 2019 (36), indicates that construction “accounted for 36% of final energy use and 39% of energy and process-related carbon dioxide emissions in 2018”.
In addition, according to the UN (37), construction accounts for about 11% of global CO2 emissions from human activities. This includes emissions associated with the production of building materials, the construction and demolition of buildings, and the operation and maintenance of buildings throughout their service life.
In this context, in order to relieve the pressure on the environment caused by the construction industry and also by the ornamental stone mining industry, this research seeks new variables for the disposal of waste from construction having in the composition of artificial rocks the addition of this waste an odd possibility to be analyzed, in an unprecedented way; directly evidencing the concept of sustainable development (environmental and economic), replacing the concept of end-of-life of linear economy, by new circular flows of reuse, restoration and renewal, in a process integrated circular economy. This possibility seeks not only to reduce costs in the production of artificial rocks, but also to promote the use, on a large scale, and with great added value, of solid waste from one of the fastest growing sectors on the planet, construction, which has massively its final disposal in landfills.