Methods
This study, which describes a new technique, was approved by the Ethics and Research Committee of the Federal University of São Paulo (number: 35229020.0.0000.5505).
This retrospective study, four consecutive case series, was conducted on patients at the Microsurgery and Complex Reconstructions outpatient clinic at Unifesp, aged between 40 and 80 years, with chronic facial paralysis, who were not candidates for dynamic rehabilitation and presented with NLF erasure.
The study involved a series of cases demonstrating the application and outcomes of the proposed technique.
The surgical marking process was initiated by determining the position of the projection of the nasolabial fold on the paralyzed side, which was achieved through measurement of the NLF on the non-paralyzed side. Subsequently, a line was drawn around the nasal ala, followed by the demarcation of a second line in the medial region of the sulcus. This second line aimed to reconstruct the nasal ala and the origin of the nasolabial fold on the paralyzed side. In the area close to the nasal ala, along this second line, a notch was planned (
Figure 1).
The procedures were performed under local anesthesia using 2% lidocaine with epinephrine. The demarcated segment underwent de-epidermization. An incision was made in the dermis at the lateral margin. Using a straight needle, the dermis was fixed to the temporal fascia at the level of the lateral region of the zygomatic arch, the lateral orbital wall, and the malar region. Typically, five iabsorbable suture points were used, although the specific type of suture was not specified. This fixation resulted in a deepening of the nasolabial fold (NLF). Finally, closure was carried out according to the surgical planes.
The evaluation of the results was performed based on photographic records obtained before and 6 months after surgery. To ensure the reproducibility of the methodology, all photographs were captured using a professional digital camera (Nikon DSLR D3200) under standardized lighting conditions in a photographic studio. The camera settings, including aperture, shutter speed, and ISO, were kept constant for all images. Patients were positioned at a fixed distance from the camera, with their face directly facing the lens and a neutral facial expression. The photographs were analyzed using a validated facial symmetry scale, which assesses the degree of symmetry between the paralyzed and non-paralyzed sides of the face. The scale ranges from 0 (complete asymmetry) to 4 (perfect symmetry).Evaluation of Nasolabial Fold (NLF) The presence and depth of the NLF were assessed using standardized photographs taken before and 6 months after the surgery. The NLF was graded using a 4-point scale, where 0 indicates the absence of NLF and 3 represents a deep and well-defined NLF.
Measurement of Lip Commissure Elevation The elevation of the ipsilateral lip commissure was measured using a digital caliper. The distance from the lip commissure to the horizontal line connecting the medial canthi was recorded before and 6 months after the surgery. The change in elevation was calculated and expressed in millimeters.
Assessment of Nasal Deviation Nasal deviation was evaluated using standardized photographs taken before and 6 months after the surgery. The angle of nasal deviation was measured using digital imaging software, and the correction of deviation was calculated as the difference between the pre- and postoperative angles.
In addition to the photographic evaluation, patients were asked about the improvement in breathing in the nostril ipsilateral to the procedure. The subjective evaluation of breathing was performed using a structured questionnaire, in which patients rated the improvement on a 5-point Likert scale: 1 (no improvement), 2 (slight improvement), 3 (moderate improvement), 4 (significant improvement), and 5 (complete improvement). Patients were asked to compare the quality of breathing before and after surgery, taking into account factors such as ease of inspiration, sensation of nasal obstruction, and perceived airflow.
The data obtained from the questionnaire were analyzed using descriptive statistics, calculating the frequency and percentage of patients in each improvement category. Furthermore, the mean and standard deviation of the improvement scores were calculated to provide a quantitative measure of the procedure's effectiveness in relation to respiratory function.
Evaluation of Complications: Patients were closely monitored for any complications during the postoperative period. The presence and severity of complications were recorded and analyzed.