Submitted:
09 May 2024
Posted:
12 May 2024
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Experimental Design and Animal Breeding Management
2.2. Weight Changes of Broiler Chickens in Each Group
2.3. European Production Efficiency Factor for Each Group of Broilers
2.4. Observation Methods of Intestinal Microstructure Tissue
2.5. Observation Method of Intestinal Ultra Microscopic Structure Tissue
2.6. Sequencing of Gut Microbiota
2.7. Methods of Data Statistical Analysis
3. Results
3.1. Changes in Body Weight of Broiler Chicken in Each Group
3.2. Comparison of EPI between Test and Control Groups of Broilers
3.3. Changes in Intestinal Microstructure
3.4. Changes in the Ratio of Small intestinal Intestinal Villus Height to Crypt Depth
3.5. Changes in the Ultramicroscopic Structure of the Intestine
3.616. S rRNA Gene Sequence Statistics
3.7. Alpha Diversity Analysis
3.8. NMDS Non Metric Multidimensional Scale Analysis

3.9. Analysis of Microbial Diversity at Phylum Level
| Samples | Kindom | Phylum | Class | Order | Family | Genus | Species | |
| CK | du | 2±0 | 27±2.52 | 50±14.01 | 107±35 | 177±73.93 | 254±126.89 | 276±143.62 |
| je | 2±0 | 21±3.21 | 35±11.02 | 71±25.51 | 109±47.18 | 149±71.77 | 160±72.92 | |
| il | 2±0.58 | 28±6.08 | 55±15.59 | 127±49.39 | 226±95.31 | 381±177.79 | 417±187.16 | |
| ce | 1±0.58 | 13±5.77 | 22±10.97 | 45±20.5 | 83±38.73 | 149±55.18 | 178±55.07 | |
| re | 2±0.58 | 25±6.66 | 51±20.21 | 115±43.04 | 195±75.92 | 306±115.77 | 345±125.3 | |
| T | du | 2±0 | 25±3.21 | 50±11.24 | 109±32.08 | 170±69.46 | 252±129.69 | 269±140.88 |
| je | 2±0 | 27±3.79 | 51±5.51 | 107±13.05 | 169±33.08 | 248±67.1 | 264±74.57 | |
| il | 2±0 | 24±2.08 | 50±5.29 | 119±10.79 | 200±10.26 | 310±22.5 | 348±25.42 | |
| ce | 2±0 | 17±5 | 29±11.14 | 63±25.79 | 103±30.12 | 175±43.27 | 209±44.6 | |
| re | 1±0 | 12±6.08 | 20±10.97 | 46±19.35 | 80±27.73 | 143±38.4 | 173±41.88 | |

3.10. Diversity Analysis of Microbial Communities at the Genus Level
3.10.1. Differential Analysis of Duodenal Microbiota at the Genus Level
3.10.2. Differential Analysis on Jejunum Microbiota at the Genus Level
3.10.3. Differential analysis on ileum microbiota at the genus level
3.10.4. Differential Analysis of Cecal Microbiota at the Genus Level
3.10.5. Differential Analysis on Rectal Microbiota at the Genus Level
4. Discussion
4.1. Effects of Sphingomonas on the Histological Structure of Intestine
4.2. Effects of Sphingomonas on Gut Microbiota
4.3. Growth Promotion of Sphingomonas spp.
5. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Gado, A. R.; Ellakany, H. F.; Elbestawy, A. R.; El-Hack, M. E. A.; Mahgoub, S. A.; Herbal Medicine Additives as Powerful Agents to Control and Prevent Avian Influenza Virus in Poultry – A Review. Ann. Anim. Sci. 2019, 19(4): 905-935. [CrossRef]
- Farag, M. R.; Alagawany. M. The role of Astragalus membranaceus as immunomodulator in poultry. World's Poultry Science Journal. 2019, 75: 1-12. [CrossRef]
- Bin-Jumah, M.; El-Hack, M. E. A.; Abdelnour, S. A.; Hendy, Y. A.; Aleya, L. Potential use of chromium to combat thermal stress in animals: A review. Science of The Total Environment. 2019, 707: 135996. [CrossRef]
- Elgeddawy, S. A.; Shaheen, H. M.; El-Sayed, Y. S.; Elaziz, M. A.; Darwish, A.; Samak, D.; Batiha, G. E.; Mady, R. A.; Bin-Jumah, M.; Allam, A. A. Effects of the dietary inclusion of a probiotic or prebiotic on florfenicol pharmacokinetic profile in broiler chicken. Journal of animal physiology and animal nutrition. 2020, 104(2): 549-557. [CrossRef]
- Hussein, E. O. S.; Suliman, G. M.; Alowaimer, A. N.; Ahmed, S. H.; Swelum, A. A. Growth, carcass characteristics, and meat quality of broilers fed a low-energy diet supplemented with a multienzyme preparation. Poultry Science. 2020, 99(4): 1988-1994. [CrossRef]
- Abd El-Hack, M. E.; El-Saadony, M. T.; Shafi, M. E.; Qattan, S. Y. A.; Batiha, G. E.; Khafaga, A. F.; Abdel-Moneim, A. E.; Alagawany, M. Probiotics in poultry feed: A comprehensive review. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr (Berl). 2020, 104: 1835-1850. [CrossRef]
- Nuria, V. S.; Yanath, B.; Ruth, R.; Eric, A.; Djamel, D. Benefits and Inputs From Lactic Acid Bacteria and Their Bacteriocins as Alternatives to Antibiotic Growth Promoters During Food-Animal Production. Frontiers in microbiology. 2019, 10: 57. [CrossRef]
- M'sadeq, S. A.; Wu, S.; Swick, R. A.; Choct, M. Towards the control of necrotic enteritis in broiler chickens with in-feed antibiotics phasing-out worldwide. Animal Nutrition. 2015: 1(1): 1-11. [CrossRef]
- Wu, Y.; Wang, B.; Zeng, Z.; Liu, R.; Tang, L.; Gong, L.; Li, W. Effects of probiotics Lactobacillus plantarum 16 and Paenibacillus polymyxa 10 on intestinal barrier function, antioxidative capacity, apoptosis, immune response, and biochemical parameters in broilers. Poult. Sci. 2019, 98: 5028-5039. [CrossRef]
- Hossain, M.; Begum, M.; Kim, I. Effect of Bacillus subtilis, Clostridium butyricum and Lactobacillus acidophilus endospores on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, meat quality, relative organ weight, microbial shedding and excreta noxious gas emission in broilers. Veterinární Medicína. 2015, 60(2): 77-86. [CrossRef]
- Liao, X. D.; Ma, G.; Cai, J.; Fu, Y.; Yan, X. Y.; Wei, X. B.; Zhang, R. J. Effects of Clostridium butyricum on growth performance, antioxidation, and immune function of broilers. Poultry Science. 2015, 94: 662-667. [CrossRef]
- Mi, J.; Chen, X.; Liao, X. Screening of single or combined administration of 9 probiotics to reduce ammonia emissions from laying hens. Poultry Science. 2019, 98: 3977-3988. [CrossRef]
- Shehata, A. A.; Tarabees, R.; Basiouni, S.; ElSayed, M. S.; Gaballah, A.; Krueger, M. Effect of a Potential Probiotic Candidate Enterococcus faecalis-1 on Growth Performance, Intestinal Microbiota, and Immune Response of Commercial Broiler Chickens. Probiotics and Antimicrobial Proteins. 2020, 12(2): 451-460. [CrossRef]
- Zhou, Y.; Zeng, Z.; Xu, Y.; Ying, J.; Wang, B.; Majeed, M.; Majeed, S.; Pande, A.; Li, W. Application of Bacillus coagulans in Animal Husbandry and Its Underlying Mechanisms. Animals (Basel). 2020, 10(3): 454. [CrossRef]
- Wang, M. C.; Wang, Y.; W, G. L.; Xu, L. L.; Li, E. Z. Isolation and identification of Sphingomonas sp. from chicken cecum and its ammonia-degrading activity. Journal of Biotech Research. 2021, 12: 65-73. https://btsjournals.com/assets/2021v12p65-73.pdf.
- Wang, M. C.; Tang, J. Z.; Wang, G. L.; Guo, Y. N.; Guo, L.; Li, E. Z. Isolation and identification of an acid-tolerant Lactobacillus species from chicken intestine and its application. Journal of Biotech Research. 2022, 13: 142-151. https://www.btsjournals.com/assets/2022v13p142-151.pdf.
- Hanafy, B. G.; Abumandour, M. M. A.; Kandyle, R.; Bassuoni, N. F. Ultrastructural characterization of the intestine of the Eurasian common moorhen using scanning electron microscopy and light microscopy. Microsc. Res. Tech. 2022, 85(1): 106-116. [CrossRef]
- Aliverdi-Nasab, K.; Zhandi, M.; Yousefi, A. R.; Zahedi, V.; Rafieian-Naeini, H. R. The effect of acidifier supplementation on egg production performance and intestinal histology of Japanese quail (Coturnix japonica). Vet. Med. Sci. 2023, 9(1): 263-271. [CrossRef]
- Li, G.; Wang, X.; Liu, Y.; Gong, S.; Yang, Y.; Wang, C.; Wang, H.; He, D. Bile acids supplementation modulates lipid metabolism, intestinal function, and cecal microbiota in geese. Front Microbiol. 2023, 14: 1185218. [CrossRef]
- Belote, B. L.; Soares, I.; Sanches, A. W. D.; de Souza, C.; Scott-Delaunay, R.; Lahaye, L.; Kogut, M. H.; Santin, E. Applying different morphometric intestinal mucosa methods and the correlation with broilers performance under Eimeria challenge. Poult. Sci. 2023, 102(9): 102849. [CrossRef]
- Bai, S. P.; Wu, A. M.; Ding, X. M.; Lei, Y.; Bai, J.; Zhang, K. Y. Effects of probiotic-supplemented diets on growth performance and intestinal immune characteristics of broiler chickens. Poultry Science, 2013, 92: 663-670. [CrossRef]
- Samanya, M.; Yamauchi, K. E. Histological alterations of intestinal villi in chickens fed dried Bacillus subtilis var. natto. Comparative biochemistry and physiology, Part A. Molecular and integrative physiology, 2002, 133(1): 95-104. [CrossRef]
- Kridtayopas, C.; Rakangtong, C.; Bunchasak, C.; Loongyai, W. Effect of prebiotic and synbiotic supplementation in diet on growth performance, small intestinal morphology, stress, and bacterial population under high stocking density condition of broiler chickens. Poult Sci. 2019, 98(10): 4595-4605. [CrossRef]
- Elbaz A. M., Ashmawy ES, Ali SAM, Mourad DM, El-Samahy HS, Badri FB, Thabet HA. Effectiveness of probiotics and clove essential oils in improving growth performance, immuno-antioxidant status, ileum morphometric, and microbial community structure for heat-stressed broilers. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13(1): 18846. [CrossRef]
- Hong, Y.; Cheng, Y.; Li, Y.; Li, X.; Zhou, Z.; Shi, D.; Li, Z.; Xiao, Y. Preliminary Study on the Effect of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens TL on Cecal Bacterial Community Structure of Broiler Chickens. Biomed. Res. Int. 2019, 2019: 5431354. [CrossRef]
- Neveling, D. P.; Dicks, L. M. T. Probiotics: an Antibiotic Replacement Strategy for Healthy Broilers and Productive Rearing. Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins. 2021, 13: 1-11. [CrossRef]
- Xu, D.; Wu, Q.; Liu, W.; Hu, G.; Meng, H.; Wang, J. Therapeutic efficacy and underlying mechanisms of Gastrodia elata polysaccharides on dextran sulfate sodium-induced inflammatory bowel disease in mice: Modulation of the gut microbiota and improvement of metabolic disorders. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023, 248: 125919. [CrossRef]
- Vacca, M.; Celano, G.; Calabrese, F. M.; Portincasa, P.; Gobbetti, M.; De Angelis, M. The Controversial Role of Human Gut Lachnospiraceae. Microorganisms. 2020, 8(4): 573. [CrossRef]
- Wielen, P. W. V. D.; Biesterveld, S.; Notermans, S.; Hofstra, H.; Knapen, F. V. Role of Volatile Fatty Acids in Development of the Cecal Microflora in Broiler Chickens during Growth. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2000, 66: 2536-2540. [CrossRef]
- Oviedo-Rondón, E. O.; Hume, M. E.; Hernández, C.; Clemente-Hernández, S. Intestinal microbial ecology of broilers vaccinated and challenged with mixed Eimeria species, and supplemented with essential oil blends. Poultry Science. 2006, 85(5): 854-860. [CrossRef]
- Parker, B. J.; Wearsch, P. A.; Veloo, A. C. M.; Rodriguez-Palacios, A. The Genus Alistipes: Gut Bacteria With Emerging Implications to Inflammation, Cancer, and Mental Health. Front Immunol. 2020, 11: 906. [CrossRef]
- Wang, C.; Zhao, J.; Zhang, H.; Lee, Y. K.; Zhai, Q.; Chen, W. Roles of intestinal bacteroides in human health and diseases. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2021, 61: 3518-3536. [CrossRef]
- Zafar, H.; Saier, M.H. Jr. Gut Bacteroides species in health and disease. Gut Microbes. 2021, 13(1): 1-20. [CrossRef]
- Sato, Y.; Atarashi, K.; Plichta, D. R.; Arai, Y.; Sasajima, S.; Kearney, S. M.; Suda, W.; Takeshita, K.; Sasaki, T.; Okamoto, S.; et al. Novel bile acid biosynthetic pathways are enriched in the microbiome of centenarians. Nature. 2021, 599(7885): 458-464. [CrossRef]
- Cui Y, Zhang L, Wang X, Yi Y, Shan Y, Liu B, Zhou Y, Lü X. Roles of intestinal Parabacteroides in human health and diseases. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2022,369(1): fnac072. [CrossRef]
- Pin Viso, N.; Redondo, E.; Díaz Carrasco, J. M.; Redondo, L.; Sabio, Y.; Garcia, J.; Fernández Miyakawa, M.; Farber, M. D. Geography as non-genetic modulation factor of chicken cecal microbiota. PLoS One. 2021, 16(1): e0244724. [CrossRef]
- Shilova, S. A.; Khrenova, M. G.; Matyuta, I. O.; Nikolaeva, A. Y.; Rakitina, T. V.; Klyachko, N. L.; Minyaev, M. E.; Boyko, K. M.; Popov, V. O.; Bezsudnova, E. Y. To the Understanding of Catalysis by D-Amino Acid Transaminases: A Case Study of the Enzyme from Aminobacterium colombiense. Molecules. 2023, 28(5): 2109. [CrossRef]
- Zhou, X.; Zhang, Z.; Huang, F.; Yang, C.; Huang, Q. In Vitro Digestion and Fermentation by Human Fecal Microbiota of Polysaccharides from Flaxseed. Molecules. 2020, 25(19): 4354. [CrossRef]
- Zhuang, P.; Li, H.; Jia, W.; Shou, Q.; Zhu, Y.; Mao, L.; Wang, W.; Wu, F.; Chen, X.; Wan, X.; Wu, Y.; Liu, X.; Li, Y.; Zhu, F.; He, L.; Chen, J.; Zhang, Y.; Jiao, J. Eicosapentaenoic and docosahexaenoic acids attenuate hyperglycemia through the microbiome-gut-organs axis in db/db mice. Microbiome. 2021, 9(1): 185. [CrossRef]
- Yu, P.; Tu, W.; Wu, M.; Zhang, Z.; Wang, H. Pilot-scale fermentation of urban food waste for volatile fatty acids production: The importance of pH. Bioresour Technol. 2021, 332: 125116. [CrossRef]
- Xiao, X.; Guo, K.; Liu, J.; Liu, Y.; Yang, C.; Xu, Y.; Deng, B. The Effect of Sodium Alginate-Coated Nano-Zinc Oxide on the Growth Performance, Serum Indexes and Fecal Microbial Structure of Weaned Piglets. Animals (Basel). 2023, 14(1): 146. [CrossRef]
- Lv, J.; Guo, L.; Chen, B.; Hao, K.; Ma, H.; Liu, Y.; Min, Y. Effects of different probiotic fermented feeds on production performance and intestinal health of laying hens. Poult. Sci. 2022, 101: 101570. [CrossRef]
- Yang, T.; Du, M.; Zhang, J.; Ahmad, B.; Cheng, Q.; Wang, X.; Abbas, Z.; Tong, Y.; Li, J.; Zhou, Y.; Zhang, R.; Si, D. Effects of Clostridium butyricum as an Antibiotic Alternative on Growth Performance, Intestinal Morphology, Serum Biochemical Response, and Immunity of Broilers. Antibiotics (Basel). 2023, 12(3): 433. [CrossRef]
- Yadav, S.; Jha, R. Strategies to modulate the intestinal microbiota and their effects on nutrient utilization, performance, and health of poultry. Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology. 2019, 10: 2. [CrossRef]




| Feeding stage (Day) | Water | Crude protein | Crude fat | Crude fiber |
Crude ash |
Calcium | Total phosphorus | Sodium chloride | Methionine |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1-18 | 12 | 22 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 0.8 | 0.65 | 0.54 | ≤0.9 |
| 19-33 | 12 | 20 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 0.8 | 0.55 | 0.38 | ≤0.9 |
| 34-42 | 12 | 19 | 7 | 3 | 5 | 0.7 | 0.6 | 0.37 | ≤0.9 |
| Sold age/d | Sold weight/kg | Survival rate | Feed conversion ratio | EPI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK | 42 | 2.54±0.006a | 0.96±0.006 a | 1.59±0.012a | 362.65±3.47a |
| T | 42 | 2.65±0.01b | 0.98±0.006b | 1.54±0.006b | 399.28±1.63b |
| intestinal segment | raw reads | clean reads | denoised reads | merged reads | non chimeric read | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK | du | 69584±13639.24 | 63662±12142.49 | 63583±12127.45 | 63109±12058.75 | 62608±12002.32 |
| je | 79087±1484.33 | 73337±2068.34 | 73278±2057.47 | 73062±2111.19 | 69890±643.3 | |
| il | 79965±87.37 | 75332±205.46 | 74958±275.43 | 71065±740.99 | 66047±1952.38 | |
| ce | 79953±195.22 | 73727±2624.85 | 73449±2531.63 | 68091±1050.93 | 60924±5916.03 | |
| re | 80060±268.34 | 73906±2927.62 | 73701±2957.73 | 71129±3951.46 | 69109±4771.54 | |
| T | du | 58835±7561.23 | 53492±6656.76 | 53425±6664.03 | 53043±6616.83 | 52233±6351.19 |
| je | 64566±26465.03 | 57869±22754.19 | 57758±22691.23 | 57221±22541.65 | 55390±20704.27 | |
| il | 71205±15305.56 | 65995±15788.91 | 65858±15748.33 | 64743±15233 | 62781±14352.12 | |
| ce | 79934±65.73 | 74194±2152.66 | 73969±2236.57 | 70843±4343.02 | 67302±6587.09 | |
| re | 67939±21015.84 | 62847±18892.92 | 62600±18770.72 | 58192±16406.67 | 53054±14027.97 |
| Sample | Feature | ACE | Chao1 | Simpson | Shannon | PD_whole_tree | Coverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK | 642±346.47 | 645±347.56 | 648±349.01 | 1±0.16 | 5±1.85 | 79±33.14 | 1 |
| T | 574±183.03 | 576±183.48 | 577±183.79 | 1±0.03 | 7±0.85 | 93±56.73 | 1 |
| Genus | CK | T |
|---|---|---|
| Aminobacterium | 9±15.59 | 35±60.04 |
| Bacteroides | 484±224.89 | 755±508.83 |
| Lactobacillus | 2195±2958.18 | 9870±12485.8 |
| Lachnospiraceae_NK4A136_group | 537±459.08 | 562±335.41 |
| Odoribacter | 2±3.21 | 102±169.51 |
| Sphingomonas | 205±80.18 | 597±361.21 |
| Genus | CK | WT |
|---|---|---|
| Alistipes | 56±11.37 | 300±343.23 |
| Bacteroides | 54±20.66 | 1562±625.47 |
| Barnesiella | 15±13.45 | 20±3.5 |
| Campylobacter | 53±86.89 | 39±9.07 |
| Christensenellaceae_R_7_group | 16±1.15 | 82±84.61 |
| Faecalibacterium | 32±18.04 | 64±54.6 |
| Lachnospiraceae_NK4A136_grou | 78±24.76 | 914±503.41 |
| Phascolarctobacterium | 0±0 | 40±69.28 |
| Proteiniphilum | 20±8.33 | 232±200 |
| [Ruminococcus]_torques_group | 25±22.34 | 43±41.55 |
| Staphylococcus | 2±1.73 | 35±28.21 |
| Sphingomonas | 35±22.3 | 313±128.91 |
| unclassified_Butyricicoccaceae | 0±0 | 6±2.05 |
| unclassified_Oscillospiraceae | 16±1.15 | 82±84.61 |
| Genus | CK | WT |
|---|---|---|
| Aminobacterium | 2±4.04 | 18±31.18 |
| Bacteroides | 931±729.93 | 1353±775.55 |
| Bilophila | 58±58.04 | 39±13.58 |
| Campylobacter | 24±33.86 | 29±14.43 |
| Escherichia_Shigella | 63±46.61 | 156±122.19 |
| Parabacteroides | 572±586.62 | 305±20.53 |
| Proteiniphilum | 0±0 | 75±125.6 |
| Sphingomonadaceae | 42±37.24 | 10±16.74 |
| Genus | CK | WT |
|---|---|---|
| Anaerotruncus | 25±27.78 | 5±5.03 |
| Barnesiella | 1281±350.15 | 2652±705.11 |
| Caproiciproducens | 0±0 | 3±5.77 |
| Christensenellaceae_R_7_group | 2143±172.87 | 2522±1006.54 |
| Rikenella | 0±0 | 392±82.25 |
| Sphingomonadaceae | 3±5.2 | 0±0 |
| unclassified_Clostridia_UCG_014 | 2470±663.49 | 1549±293.3 |
| unclassified_Oscillospiraceae | 2387±1956.92 | 3533±107.68 |
| Genus | CK | WT |
|---|---|---|
| Rikenella | 5±4.16 | 377±163.69 |
| Ruminococcus | 1126±180.33 | 1589±476.63 |
| Sphingomonadaceae | 3±5.2 | 2±4.04 |
| unclassified_Clostridia_UCG_014 | 980±303.77 | 305±114.13 |
| unclassified_Oscillospiraceae | 112±20.53 | 256±103.01 |
| uncultured_Firmicutes_bacterium | 2609±715.17 | 3247±1414.46 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).