Submitted:
07 May 2024
Posted:
08 May 2024
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Results
2.1. Cucumber Productivity and Physicochemical Properties of Growing Media
2.2. Micronutrient Content, Nitrogen Content, and C:N at the End of the Growing Season in the Growing Media
3. Discussion
4. Materials and Methods
4.1. Site Description and Experiment Design
4.2. Plant Fertilization
4.3. Measurement Properties of Growing Media
4.4. Plant Growth and Yield Measurements
4.5. Statistical Analysis
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Raviv, M. Can compost improve sustainability of plant production in growing media? Acta Hortic. 2017, 1168, 119–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gruda, N.S. Increasing Sustainability of Growing Media Constituents and Stand-Alone Substrates in Soilless Culture Systems. Agronomy 2019, 9, 298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chu, Y.-T.; Brown, P.B. Sustainable marine aquaponics: Effects of shrimp to plant ratios and C/N ratios. Front. Mar. Sci. 2021, 8, 1825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Asaduz-Zaman, M.; Saifullah, M.; Mollick, A.S.R.; Hossain, M.M.; Halim, G.M.A.; Asao, T. Influence of Soilless Culture Substrate on Improvement of Yield and Produce Quality of Horticultural Crops. In Soilless Culture-Use of Substrates For the Production of Quality Horticultural Crops; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2015; pp. 1–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zawadzińska, A.; Salachna, P.; Nowak, J.S.; Kowalczyk, W. Response of Interspecific Geraniums to Waste Wood Fiber Substrates and Additional Fertilization. Agriculture 2021, 11, 119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, T.; Altland, J.; Samarakoon, U. Evaluation of organic substrates as an alternative to perlite for cucumber production in the Dutch bucket hydroponic system. Acta Hortic. 2021, 1317, 319–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schmilewski, G. Growing medium constituents used in the EU. Acta Hortic. 2009, 819, 33–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kuisma, E.; Palonen, P.; Yli-Halla, M. Reed canary grass straw as a substrate in soilless cultivation of strawberry. Sci. Hortic. 2014, 178, 217–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dorais, M.; Ménard, C.; Bégin, G. Risk of phytotoxicity of sawdust substrates for greenhouse vegetables. Acta Hortic. 2007, 761, 589–595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carlile, W.R.; Cattivello, C.; Zaccheo, P. Organic growing media: Constituents and properties. Vadose Zone J. 2015, 14, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maher, M.; Prasad, M.; Raviv, M. Organic soilless media components. In Soilless Culture. Theory and Practice; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2008; pp. 459–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jackson, B.E.; Wright, R.D.; Alley, M.M. Comparison of fertilizer nitrogen availability, nitrogen immobilization, substrate carbon dioxide efflux, and nutrient leaching in peat-lite, pine bark, and pine tree substrates. HortScience 2009, 44, 781–790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Domeño, I.; Irigoyen, I.; Muro, J. New Wood Fibre Substrates Characterization in Hydroponic Tomato Culture. Eur. J. Hortic. Sci. 2010, 75, 89–94. [Google Scholar]
- Carlile, W.; Raviv, M.; Prasad, M. Organic soilless media components. In Soilless Culture Theory and Practice; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019; p. 691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Theurl, M.C.; Hörtenhuber, S.J.; Lindenthal, T.; Palme, W. Unheated soil-grown winter vegetables in Austria:Greenhouse gas emissions and socio-economic factors of diffusion potential. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 151, 134–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barrett, G.E.; Alexander, P.D.; Robinson, J.S.; Bragg, N.C. Achieving environmentally sustainable growing media for soilless plant cultivation systems—A review. Sci. Hortic. 2016, 212, 220–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Antón, A.; Torrellas, M.; Montero, J.I.; Ruijs, M.; Vermeulen, P.; Stanghellini, C. Environmental impact assessment of Dutch tomato crop production in a Venlo glasshouse. Acta Hortic. 2012, 927, 781–791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tzortzakis, N.; Nicola, S.; Savvas, D.; Voogt, W. Editorial: Soilless Cultivation through an Intensive Crop Production Scheme. Management Strategies, Challenges and Future Directions. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Beretta, D.; Ripamonti, M. Evaluation of wood fiber as component of substrates for container nursery crops. Acta Hortic. 2019, 1305, 77–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sivaranjani, S.; Panwar, V.P. Soil nutrient dynamics under mountainous landscape: Issues and challenges. In Understanding Soils of Mountainous Landscapes: Sustainable Use of Soil Ecosystem Services and Management; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Nether-lands, 2023; pp. 131–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sindhu, S.S.; DB, G.; Singh, M.C.; Dhiman, M.R. Effect of medium amendments on growth and flowering in gerbera. Indian J. Hortic. 2010, 67, 391–394. [Google Scholar]
- Lira-Martins, D.; Quesada, C.A.; Strekopytov, S.; Humphreys-Williams, E.; Herault, B.; Lloyd, J. Wood Nutrient-Water-Density Linkages Are Influenced by Both Species and Environment. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 778403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Krug, D.; Wagenführ, A.; Weber, A.; Wenderdel, C. Fiber-Based Materials; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2023; pp. 1491–1561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Heineman, K.D.; Turner, B.L.; Dalling, J.W. Variation in wood nutrients along a tropical soil fertility gradient. New Phytol. 2016, 211, 440–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gull, M.; Kausar, A. Comparative Analysis of Various Growth, Ions Uptake and other Physiological Performance of Two Rice (Oryza Sativa L. ) Genotypes Under Altering Saline Conditions. Pharmacophore 2018, 9, 73–81. [Google Scholar]
- Gruda, N.; Savvas, D.; Colla, G.; Rouphael, Y. Impacts of genetic material and current technologies on product quality of selected greenhouse vegetables—A review. Eur. J. Hortic. Sci. 2018, 83, 319–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gruda, N. Current and future perspective of growing media in Europe. Acta Hortic. 2012, 960, 37–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Caballero, R.; Pajuelo, P.; Ordovás, J.; Carmona, E.; Delgado, A. Evaluation and correction of nutrient availability to Gerbera jamesonii H. Bolus in various compost-based growing media. Sci. Hortic. 2009, 122, 244–250. [Google Scholar]
- Caballero, R.; Ordovás, J.; Pajuelo, P.; Carmona, E.; Delgado, A. Iron chlorosis in gerber as related to properties of various types of compost used as growing media. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 2007, 38, 2357–2369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Harris, C.N.; Dickson, R.W.; Fisher, P.R.; Jackson, B.E.; Poleatewich, A.M. Evaluating Peat Substrates Amended with Pine Wood Fiber for Nitrogen Immobilization and Effects on Plant Performance with Container-grown Petunia. HortTechnology 2020, 30, 107–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gruda, N.; Bisbis, M.; Tanny, J. Impacts of protected vegetable cultivation on climate change and adaptation strategies for cleaner production—A review. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 225, 324–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zheng, J.; Guo, R.; Li, D.; Zhang, J.; Han, S. Nitrogen addition, drought and mixture effects on litter decomposition and nitrogen immobilization in a temperate forest. Plant Soil 2017, 416, 165–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jackson, B.E.; Wright, R.D. Pine tree substrate: An alternative and renewable growing media for horticulture crop production. Acta Hortic. 2009, 819, 265–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gruda, N.; Schnitzler, W. Suitability of wood fiber substrates for production of vegetable transplants II. : The effect of wood fiber substrates and their volume weights on the growth of tomato transplants. Sci. Hortic. 2004, 100, 333–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Geisseler, D.; Horwath, W.R.; Joergensen, R.G.; Ludwig, B. Pathways of nitrogen utilization by soil microorganisms—A review. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2010, 42, 2058–2067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fain, G.B.; Gilliam, C.H.; Sibley, J.L.; Boyer, C.R.; Witcher, A.L. Wholetree substrate and fertilizer rate in production of greenhouse-grown petunia (Petunia × hybrida Vilm. ) and marigold (Tagetes patula L.). HortScience 2008, 43, 700–705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eveleensas, B.; Van Winkelis, A.; Blokas, C. Medienos pluoštas vazoninių augalų kultūroje; durpių pakeitimas iki 50% tūrio? ISHS Acta Hortic. 2021, 1317, 165–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gruda, N.; Schnitzler, W. Wood fibers as a peat alternative substrate for vegetable production. Eur. J. Wood Wood Prod. 2006, 64, 347–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Clemmensen, A.W. Physical Characteristics of Miscanthus Composts Compared to Peat and Wood Fiber Growth Substrates. Compos. Sci. Util. 2013, 12, 219–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Visconti, F.; de Paz, J.M. Electrical conductivity measurements in agriculture: The assessment of soil salinity. In New Trends and Developments in Metrology; Cocco, L., Ed.; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2016; pp. 99–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aurdal, S.M.; Woznicki, T.L.; Haraldsen, T.K.; Kusnierek, K.; Sønsteby, A.; Remberg, S.F. Wood Fiber-Based Growing Media for Strawberry Cultivation: Effects of Incorporation of Peat and Compost. Horticulturae 2023, 9, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Savvas, D.; Gianquinto, G.P.; Tüzel, Y.; Gruda, N. Good Agricultural Practices for Greenhouse Vegetable Crops—Principles for Mediterranean Climate Areas; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2013; p. 217. [Google Scholar]
- Agarwal, P.; Saha, S.; Hariprasad, P. Agro-industrial-residues as potting media: Physicochemical and biological characters and their influence on plant growth. Biomass-Convers. Biorefinery 2023, 13, 9601–9624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Owen, W.G.; Jackson, B.E.; Whipker, B.E.; Fonteno, W.C. Pine Wood Chips as an Alternative to Perlite in Greenhouse Substrates: Nitrogen Requirements. HortTechnology 2016, 26, 199–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nguyen, V.T.; Wang, C.-H. Use of organic materials as growing media for honeydew melon seedlings in organic agriculture. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 2017, 48, 2137–2147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rouphael, Y.; Kyriacou, M.C. Enhancing quality of fresh vegetables through salinity eustress and biofortification applications facilitated by soilless cultivation. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 1254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Harris, C. Evaluating Wood Fiber Soilless Substrates for Effects on Plant Performance and Nutrient Management in Con-tainer Crops. Master’s Thesis, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH, USA, 2019. Available online: https://scholars.unh.edu/thesis/1293. [Google Scholar]
- Parkinson, J.A.; Allen, S.E. A wet oxidation procedure suitable for the determination of nitrogen and mineral nutrients in biological material. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 2008, 6, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Muro, J.; Irigoyen, I.; Samitier, P.; Mazuela, P.; Salas, M.; Soler, J.; Urrestarazu, M. Wood fiber as growing medium in hydroponic crop. Acta Hortic. 2005, 697, 179–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wright, R.D.; Jackson, B.E.; Browder, J.F.; Latimer, J.G. Growth of chrysanthemum in a pine tree substrate requires additional fertilizer. HortTechnology 2008, 18, 111–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Komosa, A.; Kleiber, T.; Pirog, J. Contents of macro- and microelements in root environment of greenhouse tomato grown in rockwool and wood fiber depending on nitrogen levels in nutrient solutions. Acta Sci. Pol. Hortorum Cultus 2010, 9, 59–68 Available online: https://agroicmedupl/agro/element/bwmeta1elementdl. [Google Scholar]
- Fontana, M.; Johannes, A.; Zaccone, C.; Weisskopf, P.; Guillaume, T.; Bragazza, L.; Elfouki, S.; Charles, R.; Sinaj, S. Improving crop nu-trition, soil carbon storage and soil physical fertility using ramial wood chips. Environ. Technol. Innov. 2023, 31, 103143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vandecasteele, B.; Muylle, H.; De Windt, I.; Van Acker, J.; Ameloot, N.; Moreaux, K.; Coucke, P.; Debode, J. Plant fibers for renewable growing media: Potential of defibration, acidification or inoculation with biocontrol fungi to reduce the N drawdown and plant pathogens. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 203, 1143–1154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Piróg, J.; Komosa, A.; Markiewicz, B. The effect of wood fiber density on the content of macro and microelements in the root environment of greenhouse cucumber. J. Fruit Ornam. Plant Res. 2009, 70, 81–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Depardieu, C.; Prémont, V.; Boily, C.; Caron, J. Sawdust and Bark-Based Substrates for Soilless Strawberry Production: Irrigation and Electrical Conductivity Management. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0154104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]



| Factors | Physicochemical Properties of Growing Media | Indicators of Cucumber Productivity | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Growing Media (A) | N Fertilization Rate (B) | Moisture, % | Density, g cm−2 | EC, mS m−1 | pH | Dry Mass Content of the Plants, % | Aboveground Fresh Mass, g per Plant | Number of Fruits, per Plant | Fruit Mass, kg per Plant |
| Growing media | |||||||||
| PS | 41.48 c | 0.39 a | 399 c | 5.18 c | 18.95 a | 195.6 a | 35.15 b | 5.61 b | |
| WF/PS 25/75 | 45.55 c | 0.39 a | 513 a | 5.85 b | 17.43 b | 164.1 d | 34.85 b | 5.48 b | |
| WF/PS 50/50 | 50.98 b | 0.30 b | 370 d | 6.55 a | 16.48 c | 187.6 b | 41.18 a | 6.22 a | |
| WF | 55.99 a | 0.23 b | 420 b | 5.98 b | 14.30 d | 172.0 c | 36.80 b | 5.68 b | |
| Fertilization | |||||||||
| CF | 55.40 a | 0.33 a | 172 d | 6.18 a | 17.13 ab | 212.9 a | 36.61 b | 6.06 a | |
| N13 | 54.90 a | 0.33 a | 434 c | 5.88 b | 17.25 a | 204.0 a | 40.00 a | 6.03 a | |
| N23 | 49.14 b | 0.33 a | 522 b | 5.80 b | 16.13 c | 157.5 b | 34.55 b | 5.40 b | |
| N30 | 34.56 c | 0.33 a | 575 a | 5.70 b | 16.65 b | 144.9 c | 36.82 b | 5.51b | |
| Influence and interactions | |||||||||
| A | ** | * | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | |
| B | ** | ns | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | |
| A × B | ns | ns | ** | ns | ** | ** | ** | ** | |
| Growing Media | Fertilization Rate | Cu | Zn | Mn | Fe | B | Cl |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PS | CF | −2 | −67 | −18 | −65 | 1 | 853 |
| N13 | −4 | −66 | −37 | −80 | 21 | 586 | |
| N23 | 16 | −42 | −36 | −78 | 76 | 870 | |
| N30 | −11 | −28 | −26 | −64 | 44 | 1044 | |
| WF/PS 25/75 | CF | 13 | −45 | −1 | −59 | 31 | 14 |
| N13 | 7 | −33 | −9 | −74 | 50 | 97 | |
| N23 | −3 | −36 | −2 | −77 | 56 | 91 | |
| N30 | 35 | −24 | −7 | −59 | 102 | 120 | |
| WF/PS 50/50 | CF | −31 | −47 | −14 | −47 | 1 | −9 |
| N13 | −25 | −52 | −22 | −49 | 26 | 14 | |
| N23 | −33 | −48 | −22 | −63 | 36 | 119 | |
| N30 | −20 | −40 | −21 | −63 | 81 | 144 | |
| WF | CF | −39 | −62 | −60 | −86 | −18 | 118 |
| N13 | −39 | −70 | −77 | −82 | 27 | 150 | |
| N23 | −39 | −53 | −71 | −62 | 25 | 232 | |
| N30 | −39 | −75 | −78 | −71 | 12 | 269 |
| Factor | Micronutrient Content of the Growing Media mg kg−1 | Ntotal % | Nmin mg kg−1 |
C:N | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Growing Media (A) | N Fertilization Rate (B) | Cu | Mn | Zn | Fe | B | Cl | |||
| Growing media | ||||||||||
| PS | 2.73 b | 17.11 c | 6.59 ab | 27.25 c | 18.98 b | 281 b | 1.28 b | 136.4 bc | 52.50 b | |
| WF/PS 25/75 | 2.92 b | 22.28 b | 5.32 b | 45.50 b | 20.93 ab | 312 ab | 1.35 a | 116.6 c | 48.25 c | |
| WF/PS 50/50 | 10.61 a | 36.39 a | 7.44 a | 76.00 a | 23.95 a | 292 b | 1.26 b | 154.1 ab | 47.92 c | |
| WF | 2.52 b | 11.70 d | 6.78 ab | 34.58 c | 17.08 b | 342 a | 0.88 c | 186.6 a | 94.75 a | |
| Fertilization | ||||||||||
| CF | 4.37 b | 24.80 a | 6.51 b | 50.25 a | 15.43 b | 225 d | 0.90 c | 74.9 c | 79.17 a | |
| N13 | 4.65 ab | 20.38 b | 5.70 c | 41.75 b | 19.58 a | 262 c | 1.05 b | 155.4 b | 62.75 b | |
| N23 | 4.25 b | 21.63 b | 7.14 a | 42.33 b | 22.05 a | 344 b | 1.37 a | 224.5 a | 51.75 c | |
| N30 | 5.52 a | 20.68 b | 6.78 ab | 49.00 a | 23.88 a | 395 a | 1.45 a | 239.0 a | 49.75 d | |
| Influence and interactions | ||||||||||
| A | ** | ** | * | ** | * | * | ** | ** | ** | |
| B | * | * | * | * | * | ** | * | ** | ** | |
| A × B | * | * | * | * | ns | * | * | ** | ** | |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).