Submitted:
01 May 2024
Posted:
02 May 2024
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Animals
2.2. Bacterial Cellulose Hydrogel with Alginate
2.3. Frog Skin (Rana catesbeiana)
2.4. Production of the Wounds
2.5. Treatments
2.6. Clinical and photographic evaluation of wounds.
2.7. Biopsy and Histopathological Evaluation
2.8. Statistical Analysis
3. Results
3.1. Physical Assessment
3.2. Assessment of the Wounds
3.2.1. Wound Area
3.2.2. Contraction Rate
3.3. Histopathological Evaluation
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Theoret, C.L.; Wilmink, J.M. Aberrant wound healing in the horse: naturally occurring conditions reminiscent of those observed in man. Wound Repair Regen., 2013. 21, 3, 365-371. PubMed. [CrossRef]
- Baxter, G.M. Wound healing and delayed wound closure in the lower limb of the horse. Eq. Pract., 1988. 10, 1, 23-31.
- Knottenbelt, D.C. Equine wound management: are the significant differences in healing at different sites on the body? Vet. Dermatol., 1997. v.8, p.273-290. [CrossRef]
- Swaim, S.S.; Henderson, R.A. Wound healing. In Small Animal Wound Management, 2nd ed.; Swaim, S.S., Henderson, R.A.; Williams & Wilkins: Baltimore, Maryland, EUA, 1997; pp.101-12.
- Barud, H. S; Barrios; C.; Regiani, T.; Marques, R.F.C.; Verelst, M.; Dexpert-Ghys, J.; Messaddeq, Y.; Ribeiro, S.J.L. Self-supported silver nanoparticles containing bacterial cellulose membranes. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2008. C28, 515–518. [CrossRef]
- Foresti, M.L.; Vázquez, A.; Boury, B. Applications of bacterial cellulose as precursor of carbono and composites with metal oxide, metal sulfide and metal nanoparticles: A review of recent advances. Carbohydr. Polym., 2017. 157, 447-446. [CrossRef]
- Denadai, D.S.; Guiati, M.Z.; Urzedo, G.F.; Faria, A.P.P.A.; Mendes, L.C.N.; Peiró, J.R.; Andrade, A.L.; Lucas, F.A. Termografia de feridas lombares experimentais tratadas com gel de biocelulose em equinos (Resumo). Revista Veterinária e Zootecnia em Minas. Suplemento Especial. 348-349. In IX SIMCAV. Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil, 25 a 27 de abril de 2019.
- Sheridan, R.L.; Tompkins, R.G. Skin substitutes in burns. Burns, 1999. 25, 2, 97-103. [CrossRef]
- Pruitt Jr., B.A. The evolutionary development of biologic dressings and skin substitutes. J. Burn Care Rehabil., 1997. 18, 1, Pt 2, S2-S5. [CrossRef]
- Oliveira, C. R. Propriedades fisicas e biológicas do novo curativo constituído da pele da rã Rana Catesbeiana. Dissertaçao de Mestrado em Biologia Animal, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Departamento de Ciências Fisiológicas, Universidade de Brasília. Brasília, Distrito Federal. Brazil. 2002. 62p.
- Adorno, J. Avaliação histológica e imunohistoquímica de cicatrização com curativo de pele de rã (Rana catesbeiana) em pacientes vítimas de queimaduras. Dissertação de Mestrado em Ciências Médicas, Universidade de Brasília. Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brazil. 2005. 73p.
- Ramsey, D.T.; Pope, E.R.; Wagner-Mann, C.; Berg, J.N.; Swain, S.F. Effects of three occlusive dressing materials on healing of full-thickness skin wounds in dogs. Am. J. Vet. Res., 1995. 56, 7, 941-949. [CrossRef]
- Oliveira Jr., L.A.T.; Souza, V.R.C.; Endringer, D.C.; Hendrickson, D.A.; Coelho, C.S. Effects of topical application of sunflower-seed oil on experimentally induced wounds in horses. J.E.V.S. 2012, 32, 3, 139-145. [CrossRef]
- Lucas, F.A.; Kandrotas, A.L.; Nardin Neto, E.; Siqueira, C.E.; André, G.A.; Bromerschenkel, I; Perri, S.H.V. Copaiba oil in experimental wound healing in horses. Cienc. Rural. 2017, 47, 4, e20151292. [CrossRef]
- Madison, J.B.; Gronwall, R.R. Influence of wound shape on wound contraction in horses. Am. J. Vet. Res. 1992. 53, 9, 1575-1578. PMID: 1416358. [CrossRef]
- Martins, E.A.N.; Invernizzi, M.S.; Campos, M.G.N.; Teodoro, P.A.; Contieri, M.B.; Silva, L.C.L.C. Emprego de membrana de quitosana em feridas cutâneas induzidas experimentalmente em equinos. Cienc. Rural. 2013. 43, 10, 1824-1830. [CrossRef]
- Tracey, A.K.; Alcott, C.J.; Schleining, J.A.; Safayi, S.; Zaback, P.C.; Hostetter, J.M.; Reinertson, E.L. The effects of topical oxygen therapy on equine distal limb dermal wound healing. Can. Vet. J., 2014. 55, 1146-1152.
- Gomez, J.H.; Schumacher, J.; Lauten, S.D.; Sartin, E.A.; Hathcock, T.L.; Swaim, S.F. Effects of 3 biologic dressings on healing of cutaneous wounds. Can J Vet Res., 2004. 68, 49-55.
- Souza, D.W.; Machado, T.S.L.; Zoppa, A.L.V., Cruz, R.S.F.; Gárague, A.P.; Silva, L.C.L.C. Ensaio da aplicação de creme à base de Triticum vulgare na cicatrização de feridas cutâneas induzidas em equinos. Rev. Bras. Pl. Med. 2006, 8, 3, 9-13.
- Harman, R.M.; Theoret, C.L.; Van De Walle, G.R. The horse as a model for the study of cutaneous wound healing. Adv. Wound Care. 2021, 10, 7, 381-399. [CrossRef]
- Talukdar, A.H.; Calhoun, M.L.; Stinson, A.W. Microscopic anatomy of the skin of the horse. Am. J. Vet. Res. 1972. 33, 12, 2365-2390.
- Summerfield, A.; Meurens, F.; Ricklin, M.E. The immunology of the porcine skin and its value as a model for human skin. Mol. Immunol. 2015, 66, 1, 14-21. [CrossRef]
- Pandey, M.; Mohamad, N.; Low, W-L.; Martin, C.; Amin, M.C.I.M. Microwaved bacterial cellulose-based hydrogel microparticles for the healing of partial thickness burn wounds. Drug. Deliv. Transl. Res., 2017. 7, 89-99. [CrossRef]
- Paiva, L.A.F.; Cunha, K.M.A.; Santos, F.A.; Gramosa, N.V.; Silveira, E.R.; Rao, V.S.N. Investigation on the wound healing activity of oleoresin from Copaifera langsdorffi in rats. Phytotherapy Res., 2002. 16, 8, 737-739. [CrossRef]
- Klouda, L.; Mikos, A.G. Thermoresponsive hydrogels in biomedical applications. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm., 2008. 68, 34–45. [CrossRef]
- Zahedi, P.; Rezaeian, I; Ranaei-Siadat, S.O.; Jafari, S.H.; Supaphol, P. A review on wound dressings with an emphasis on electrospun nanofibrous polymeric bandages. Polym. Adv. Technol., 2010. 21, 77-95. [CrossRef]
- Junker, J.P.E.; Kamel, R.A.; Caterson, E.J.; Eriksson, E. Clinical impact upon wound healing and inflammation in moist, wet, and dry environments. Adv. Wound Care. 2013. 2, 348–56. [CrossRef]
- Calich, V.L.G.; Pina, A. Os leucócitos polimorfonucleares são importantes reguladores da imunidade e da produção de citocinas por camundongos resistentes e susceptíveis à infecção pelo Paracoccidioides brasiliensis. In 54ª Reunião Anual da SBPC. 2002. Goiânia-GO Brasil, julho 2002.
- Wilmink, J.M.; Van Weeren, P.R.; TH Stolk, P.W.; Van Mil, F.N.; Barneveld, A. Differences in second-intention wound healing between horses and ponies: histological aspects. Equine Vet. J., 1999. 31, 1, 61-67. ISSN 2042-3306.
- Clarck, D.P.; Durell, S.; Maloy, W.L.; Zasloff, M. Ranalexin. A novel antimicrobial peptide from bullfrog (Rana catesbeiana) skin, structurally related to the bacterial antibiotic, polymyxin. J. Biol. Chem., 1994. 269, 10849-10855. [CrossRef]
- Falcão, S.C.; Lopes, S.L.; Coelho, A.R.B.; Almeida, E.L. Pele de Rana catesbeiana como curativo biológico oclusivo no tratamento de feridas cutâneas produzidas em cães. Alterações macroscópicas e microscópicas resultantes da interação desses tecidos. Estudo preliminar. Acta Cir. Bras., 2002. 17, 3, 151-159. [CrossRef]
- Miteva, D.; Solak, A.; Dyankova, S.; Nacheva, I.; Dimov, K. Assessment of allergenicity of irradiated dairy products in a Balb/c mice model. Pharmacia. 2020. 67, 3, 129-133. [CrossRef]
- Costa, B.O.; Lima Júnior. E.M.; Fechine, F.V.; Alves, A.P.N.N.; Melo, M.M.O.; Ribeiro, W.L.C.; Siqueira, J.P.; Moraes Filho, M.O. Utilização da pele de tilápia-do-Nilo (Oreochromis niloticus) como xenoenxerto em um equino com ferimento traumático. Acta Sci. Vet., 2020. 48, Supll.1, 506. [CrossRef]









| Groups | D0 | D3 | D7 | D14 | D21 | D28 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CG | 7.94 ± 2.55 Aa | 5.84 ± 1.22 ABa | 5.07 ± 1.06 Ba | 3.29 ± 1.68 BCa | 1.79 ± 1.32 CDa | 0.31 ± 0.30 Da |
| CBAG | 8.32 ± 1.67 Aa | 7.29 ± 1.55 Aa | 6.11 ± 1.16 Aa | 2.65 ± 0.99 Ba | 1.54 ± 0.83 Ba | 0.54 ± 0.31 Ba |
| FSG | 9.23 ± 1.37 Aa | 7.4 ± 1.46 ABa | 5.85 ± 2.28 BCa | 4.5 ± 2.08 CDa | 3.08 ±1.60 DEa | 1.09 ± 0.72 Ea |
| Groups | D3 | D7 | D14 | D21 | D28 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CG | 24.40 ± 11.86Aa | 32.28 ± 17.95ABa | 56.57 ± 24.48BCa | 76.51 ± 18.81CDa | 96.08 ± 3.92Da |
| CBAG | 12.24. ± 5.57Aa | 26.07 ± 7.52Aa | 67.68 ± 10.97Ba | 80.34 ± 12.33Ba | 92.87 ± 5.38Ba |
| FSG | 18.83 ± 14.32Aa | 36.14 ± 23.85ABa | 51.95 ± 18.68BCa | 67.39 ± 14.87CDa | 88.60 ± 6.53Da |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).