Version 1
: Received: 9 April 2024 / Approved: 9 April 2024 / Online: 9 April 2024 (12:30:20 CEST)
How to cite:
Cornwall, R. The Fisher-Tully Law solely with 1915 General Relativity and Dark Energy. Preprints2024, 2024040669. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202404.0669.v1
Cornwall, R. The Fisher-Tully Law solely with 1915 General Relativity and Dark Energy. Preprints 2024, 2024040669. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202404.0669.v1
Cornwall, R. The Fisher-Tully Law solely with 1915 General Relativity and Dark Energy. Preprints2024, 2024040669. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202404.0669.v1
APA Style
Cornwall, R. (2024). The Fisher-Tully Law solely with 1915 General Relativity and Dark Energy. Preprints. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202404.0669.v1
Chicago/Turabian Style
Cornwall, R. 2024 "The Fisher-Tully Law solely with 1915 General Relativity and Dark Energy" Preprints. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202404.0669.v1
Abstract
Observation of the distribution of the velocity of galactic rotation curves differed from their expected centripetal form and lead to the notion of Dark Matter or modifications to Newtonian and General Relativity, such as MOND, TeVeS and the like and even Quantised Inertia. We aim to show that General Relativity with Dark Energy/the Cosmological Constant is all that is needed, with the proviso that the Cosmological Constant can increase in the presence of a light flux or some other factor from galaxies and become gravitating; the need for Dark Matter may be abated.
Keywords
Fisher-Tully, Galactic Rotation Curves, Dark Energy, Dark Matter, Hubble Constant
Subject
Physical Sciences, Astronomy and Astrophysics
Copyright:
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Commenter's Conflict of Interests:
I am one of the author
Comment:
My stab at an explanation for the Fisher-Tully Law - preserve GR and put the anomalous stuff in the Cosmological "constant"/Parameter (dark energy) that can vary from place to place. First draft.
I will do an update of this in due course (draft 1 is fresh off the press, so to speak) to show what I mean by the metrics and SET with the swamping. Note that energy (a positive quantity) is cumulative over space, whereas the other non g00 components of the SET from Lamba are swamped with the contributions from matter. Add to this the idea that dark energy/Cosmological Constant/Parameter is now a field that is modulated by the overlying matter and energy fields. This was justified to some extent in a earlier paper. As I say, GR responds to absolute energy, whereas the rest of physics is differences in energy.
Commenter:
Commenter's Conflict of Interests: I am one of the author
I will do an update of this in due course (draft 1 is fresh off the press, so to speak) to show what I mean by the metrics and SET with the swamping. Note that energy (a positive quantity) is cumulative over space, whereas the other non g00 components of the SET from Lamba are swamped with the contributions from matter. Add to this the idea that dark energy/Cosmological Constant/Parameter is now a field that is modulated by the overlying matter and energy fields. This was justified to some extent in a earlier paper. As I say, GR responds to absolute energy, whereas the rest of physics is differences in energy.