Submitted:
19 March 2024
Posted:
19 March 2024
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Material Constitutive and Finite Element Modeling
2.1. Material Constitutive
3.2. Numerical Model
3. Bridge Performance and Result Discussion
3.1. Failure Mode of PSBG
3.2. Failure Mode of Strengthening Method 1
3.3. Failure Mode of Strengthening Method 2
3.4. Failure Mode of Strengthening Method 3
4. Discussion of the Failure Mechanism
5. Conclusions
- (1)
- After verification by previous studies, the damage mode of PSBG consists of global flexural-shear failure and local flexural failure under car explosion. To avoid excessive deformation even bridge collapse after car explosion, it is the key to enhance the flexural-shear capacity of the section and the local flexural capacity of the bridge deck. According to the damage mode, U-shape steel plate and flat steel plate are proposed to enhance the global flexural-shear capacity and bending capacity of bridge deck respectively.
- (2)
- Compared with the primary structure, the three strengthening methods can effectively improve the anti-explosion performance of box girder under car explosion. After strengthening with the U-shaped steel plate, the structural failure modes change from global flexural-shear failure to global flexural failure. Adhering steel plate in the lower edge of the top deck can improve the bending capacity of the top deck, reducing the failure in compression zone and strengthening the global flexural resistance. While the steel plate attached to the upper edge of the top deck, the local impact vibration and the bending capacity is strengthened concurrently. As a result, the damage mode is not obviously improved.
- (3)
- Strengthening method 2 is the most effective way to improve the anti-explosion performance of prefabricated small box girder bridges, reducing structural failure, maintaining bearing capacity, avoiding bridge collapse, and buying time for subsequent rescue and maintenance.
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Draganić, H.; Gazić, G.; Varevac, D. Experimental Investigation of Design and Retrofit Methods for Blast Load Mitigation – A State-of-the-Art Review. Engineering Structures 2019, 190, 189–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, W.; Liu, R.; Wu, B. Analysis of a Bridge Collapsed by an Accidental Blast Loads. Engineering Failure Analysis 2014, 36, 353–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhai, C.; Chen, L.; Xiang, H.; Fang, Q. Experimental and Numerical Investigation into RC Beams Subjected to Blast after Exposure to Fire. International Journal of Impact Engineering 2016, 97, 29–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, Z.; Li, Y.; He, S.; Ma, C. Analysis of the Failure Mechanism of Multi-Beam Steel–Concrete Composite Bridge under Car Explosion. Advances in Structural Engineering 2020, 23, 538–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Yu, W.; Mao, S.; Fang, J. Anti-Blast Resistance Analysis of Prestressed Concrete Bridges under Close-by Blast. China Journal of Highway and Transport 2019, 32, 71–80. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, C.; Gholipour, G.; Mousavi, A.A. Nonlinear Dynamic Behavior of Simply-Supported RC Beams Subjected to Combined Impact-Blast Loading. Engineering Structures 2019, 181, 124–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shiravand, M.R.; Parvanehro, P. Numerical Study on Damage Mechanism of Post-Tensioned Concrete Box Bridges under Close-in Deck Explosion. Engineering Failure Analysis 2017, 81, 103–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, J.; Choi, K.; Chung, C. Numerical Analysis-Based Blast Resistance Performance Assessment of Cable-Stayed Bridge Components Subjected to Blast Loads. Applied Sciences 2020, 10, 8511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schmidt, J.W.; Sørensen, J.D.; Christensen, C.O. In Situ Concrete Bridge Strengthening Using Ductile Activated NSMR CFRP System. Buildings 2022, 12, 2244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, S.-H.; Park, J.-S.; Jung, W.-T.; Kim, T.-K.; Park, H.-B. Experimental Study on Strengthening Effect Analysis of a Deteriorated Bridge Using External Prestressing Method. Applied Sciences 2021, 11, 2478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, S.-H.; Park, J.-S.; Jung, W.-T.; Kang, J.-Y. Strengthening Effect of the External Prestressing Method That Simulated a Deterioration Bridge. Applied Sciences 2021, 11, 2553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- MOT, (Ministry of Transportation) Code for Design of Highway Reinforced Concrete and Prestressed Concrete Bridges and Culverts. [In Chinese.] JTG D62-2004. Beijing. 2004.
- MOT, (Ministry of Transportation) Specifications for Strengthening Design of Highway Bridges. [In Chinese.] JTG/T J22-2008. Beijing. 2008.
- Forni, D.; Chiaia, B.; Cadoni, E. Blast Effects on Steel Columns under Fire Conditions. Journal of Constructional Steel Research 2017, 136, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thomas, R.J.; Steel, K.; Sorensen, A.D. Reliability Analysis of Circular Reinforced Concrete Columns Subject to Sequential Vehicular Impact and Blast Loading. Engineering Structures 2018, 168, 838–851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tu, Z.; Lu, Y. Modifications of RHT Material Model for Improved Numerical Simulation of Dynamic Response of Concrete. International Journal of Impact Engineering 2010, 37, 1072–1082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Forni, D.; Chiaia, B.; Cadoni, E. Strain Rate Behaviour in Tension of S355 Steel: Base for Progressive Collapse Analysis. Engineering Structures 2016, 119, 164–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hashemi, S.K.; Bradford, M.A.; Valipour, H.R. Dynamic Response and Performance of Cable-Stayed Bridges under Blast Load: Effects of Pylon Geometry. Engineering Structures 2017, 137, 50–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Williamson, E.B.; Bayrak, O.; Davis, C.; Williams, G.D. Performance of Bridge Columns Subjected to Blast Loads. I: Experimental Program. J. Bridge Eng. 2011, 16, 693–702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kyei, C.; Braimah, A. Effects of Transverse Reinforcement Spacing on the Response of Reinforced Concrete Columns Subjected to Blast Loading. Engineering Structures 2017, 142, 148–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yan, B.; Liu, F.; Song, D.; Jiang, Z. Numerical Study on Damage Mechanism of RC Beams under Close-in Blast Loading. Engineering Failure Analysis 2015, 51, 9–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, J.; Wu, C.; Hao, H.; Su, Y. Experimental and Numerical Study on Steel Wire Mesh Reinforced Concrete Slab under Contact Explosion. Materials & Design 2017, 116, 77–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, J.; Yin, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Li, Y. Dynamic Behavior Analysis of I-Shaped RC Beams under Combined Blast and Impact Loads. Applied Sciences 2023, 13, 1943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hao, H.; Tang, E.K.C. Numerical Simulation of a Cable-Stayed Bridge Response to Blast Loads, Part II: Damage Prediction and FRP Strengthening. Engineering Structures 2010, 32, 3193–3205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Son, J.; Lee, H.-J. Performance of Cable-Stayed Bridge Pylons Subjected to Blast Loading. Engineering Structures 2011, 33, 1133–1148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tang, E.K.C.; Hao, H. Numerical Simulation of a Cable-Stayed Bridge Response to Blast Loads, Part I: Model Development and Response Calculations. Engineering Structures 2010, 32, 3180–3192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yao, S.; Zhang, D.; Lu, F.; Wang, W.; Chen, X. Damage Features and Dynamic Response of RC Beams under Blast. Engineering Failure Analysis 2016, 62, 103–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Andreou, M.; Kotsoglou, A.; Pantazopoulou, S. Modelling Blast Effects on a Reinforced Concrete Bridge. Advances in Civil Engineering 2016, 2016, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carta, G.; Stochino, F. Theoretical Models to Predict the Flexural Failure of Reinforced Concrete Beams under Blast Loads. Engineering Structures 2013, 49, 306–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pan, Y.; Chan, B.Y.B.; Cheung, M.M.S. Blast Loading Effects on an RC Slab-on-Girder Bridge Superstructure Using the Multi-Euler Domain Method. J. Bridge Eng. 2013, 18, 1152–1163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]



















| Compressive Strength (fc)(MPa) | Tensile Strength (ft/fc) |
Shear Strength (fs/fc) |
Elastic modulus (MPa) |
Shear modulus (MPa) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 32.4 | 0.1 | 0.18 | 32500 | 13000 |
| Material | Parameter A (MPa) |
Parameter B (MPa) |
Parameter C | Parameter n | Parameter m |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Steel bar | 330 | 405.9 | 0.26 | 0.014 | 1.03 |
| Prestressed tendon | 1860 | 2287.8 | 0.26 | 0.014 | 1.03 |
| Steel plate | 345 | 424.4 | 0.26 | 0.014 | 1.03 |
|
(g·cm-3) |
(J·kg-1) |
|
|---|---|---|
| 0.00125 | 2.068×105 | 1.4 |
| Parameter R1 | Parameter R2 | Parameter A (MPa) | Parameter B (MPa) | Parameter |
Density (g·cm-3) |
V |
E0 (J·kg-1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4.15 | 0.90 | 3.378×105 | 3.747×103 | 0.35 | 1.63 | 1.00 | 7.0×106 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).