Submitted:
26 January 2024
Posted:
30 January 2024
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Research site
2.2. Experimental methods
2.2.1. Mobile laboratory
| Measurement | Instrument | Unit | Interval |
|---|---|---|---|
| Latitude, longitude | GPS | ° | 1 s |
| Elevation | GPS | m | |
| Speed | GPS | km/h | |
| VOCs | PTR-ToF-MS | ppb | 6 s |
2.2.2. Target substances
2.2.3. Measurement procedure
2.2.4. GIS analysis
3. Results
3.1. Concentration distribution of VOCs
3.2. Spatiotemporal patterns of VOC concentrations
3.3. GIS-based pollution hotspot analysis

4. Discussion and conclusion
References
- AuthorMinistry of Environment, 2021. National Air Pollutants Emission 2011 (in Korean).
- Scheff, P. A. and Wadden, R. A., Receptor modeling of volatile organic compounds: Emission inventory and validation, Environmental Science & Technology 1993, 27, 617–625. [Google Scholar]
- Bloemen, H. J. T. and Burn, J. Chemistry and Analysis of Volatile Organic Compounds in the Environment. Chapman & Hall: London, 1993. [Google Scholar]
- Kim, J. C. Trends and control technologies of volatile organic compound. Korea J Atmos Environ 2006, 22, 743–757. [Google Scholar]
- Kim, D. G., Song. Concentration distribution of toxic volatile organic hydrocarbons in Gyeonggi-do’s atmosphere. J Korean Society for Environmental Analysis (in Korean). 2018, 21, 11–23. [Google Scholar]
- Lee, D. S., Kim. A study on distribution of volatile organic compounds concentration over Paju national publishing complex. J Korean Society for Atmospheric Environment 2022, 38, 599–609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Godish, T., Davis. Air Quality, 5th ed; 2017; CRC Press/ Lewis Publishers: Boca Raton. [Google Scholar]
- Soni, V. , Singh, P., Shree, V., Goel, V., 2018. Effects of VOCs on human health, In: Air Pollution and Control. Ed. by N. Sharma, A. K. Agarwal, P. Eastwood, T. Gupta, & A. P. Singh, Gateway East: Springer Singapore, pp. 119-142. [CrossRef]
- Seinfeld, J. H., Pandis. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics: From Air Pollution to Climate Change (3rd ed.).; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Kim, C. H., Kim. A study on temporal–spatial characteristics of volatile organic compounds distributed near a petrochemical industrial complex using PTR-ToF-MS. J Korean Society for Atmospheric Environment 2021, 37, 812–828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Molhave, L. , 1991. Volatile organic compounds: Indoor air quality and health, IndoorAir, 1(4), 357–376. [CrossRef]
- Son, B. , Breysse, P., Yang, W., 2003. Volatile organic compounds concentration in residential indoor and outdoor and its personal exposure in Korea, Environment International, 29(1), 79–85. [CrossRef]
- Park, S. C. Kim, J. B., Lee, G. H., Noh, S. J., Chae, J. S., Kim, M. Y., Jeon, J. M., Lee, S. S., and Kim. J. B.Characteristics of spatial distribution VOCs around a petrochemical complex using a passive sampler. J Korean Society for Atmospheric Environment 2022, 38, 764–775. (in Korean) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheng, S. , Zhang, J., Wang, Y., Zhang, D., Teng, G., Chien, G. C., Huang, Q., Zhang, Y. B., Yan, P., 2019. Global research trends in health effects of volatile organic compounds during the last 16 years: A bibliometric analysis, Aerosol and Air Quality Research, 19, 1834–1843. [CrossRef]
- Liu, Y. , Shao, M., Fu, L. L., Lu, S. H., Zeng, L. M., Tang, D.G., 2008. Source profile of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) measured in China: Part I, Atmospheric Environment, 42, 6247–6260.
- Kim, J. B. Kim, C. H., Noh, S. J., Hwang, E. Y., Park, D. S., Lee, J. J., and Kim. J. H. A study on spatial distribution characteristics of air pollutants in Bucheon-si using a mobile laboratory. J Particle and Aerosol Research 2020, 17, 9–20. [Google Scholar]
- Kim, M. K. , Kim, D. H., Jang, Y. L., Lee, J. Y., Ko, S. W., Kim, K. H., Park, C. S., and Park, D. S., 2023. Determination of the spatial distribution of air pollutants in Bucheon, Republic of Korea, in winter using a GIS-based mobile laboratory, Toxics,. [CrossRef]
- Hitchins, J., Morawska. Concentration of submicrometre particles from vehicle emissions near a major road. Atmospheric Environment 2000, 34, 51–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Westerdahl, D., Fruin S. Mobile platform measurements of ultrafine particles and associated pollutant concentrations of freeways and residential streets in Los Angeles. Atmospheric Environment 2005, 39, 3597–3610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Woo, D. Lee, S. B., Lee, S. J., Kim, J. Y., Jin, H. C., Kim, T. S., and Bae, G. N. Spatial distribution of on-road ultrafine particle number concentration on Naebu Express Way in Seoul during winter season. J Korean Society for Atmospheric Environment 2013, 29, 10–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bossche, J. V. D. Peters, J., Verwaeren, J., Botteldooren, D., Theunis, J., and Baets, B. D. Mobile monitoring for mapping spatial variation in urban air quality: Development and validation of a methodology based on ana extensive dataset. Atmospheric Environment 2015, 105, 148–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, K. H. Kwak, K. H., Lee, J. Y., Woo, S. H., Kim, J. B., Lee, S. B., Ryu, S. H., Kim, C. H., Bae, G. N., and Oh, I. B., Spatial mapping of a highly non-uniform distribution of particle-bound PAH in a densely polluted urban area. Atmosphere 2020, 11, 496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lindinger, W. Hansel, A., Jordan, A., On-line monitoring of volatile organic compounds at pptv levels by means of proton-transfer-reaction mass spectrometry (PTR-MS): Medical applications, food control and environmental research. International J Mass Spectrometry 1998, 173, 191–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hansel, A. Jordan, A., Warneke, C., Holzinger, R., Lindinger, W. Improved detection limit of the proton-transfer reaction mass spectrometer: On-line monitoring of volatile organic compounds at mixing ratios of a few pptv. Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry 1998, 12, 871–875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moser, B. Bodrogi, F., Eibl, G., Lechner, M., Rieder, J., Lirk, P. Mass spectrometric profile of exhaled breath field study by PTR-MS. Respiratory Physiology and Neurobiology, 2005; 145, 295–300. [Google Scholar]
- De Gouw, J., Warneke, C. Measurements of volatile organic compounds in the Earth’s atmosphere using proton-transfer-reaction mass spectrometry. Mass Spectrometry Reviews 2006, 26, 223–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- APM Engineering Co., Ltd. , 2019. Test Report of Inlet System Installed for ML.
- United State Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA). 1997. Compendium Method TO17: Determination of Volatile Organic Compounds in Ambient Air Using Active Sampling onto Sorbent Tubes. 1-49.
- Zhang, Z. , Zhang, Y., Wang, X., Lü, S., Huang, Z., Huang, X., Yang, W., Wang, Y., Zhang, Q. 2016. Spatiotemporal patterns and source implications of aromatic hydrocarbons at six rural sites across China’s developed coastal regions, J Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 121(11), 6669–6687. [CrossRef]


















| Compound | Formula | Molar mass | Protonated mass | Chemical Abstracts Service # |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Formaldehyde | CH2O | 30.026 | 31.018 | 50-00-0 |
| Methanol | CH4O | 32.04 | 33.033 | 67-56-1 |
| Acetonitrile | C2H3N | 41.053 | 42.034 | 75-05-8 |
| Propylene | C3H6 | 42.08 | 43.054 | 115-07-1 |
| Propane | C3H8 | 44.097 | 44.997 | 74-98-6 |
| Acetaldehyde | C2H4O | 44.053 | 45.033 | 75-07-0 |
| Acrylonitrile | C3H3N | 53.064 | 54.034 | 107-13-1 |
| 1,3-Butadiene | C4H6 | 54.0916 | 55.054 | 106-99-0 |
| n+i-Butene | C4H10 | 58.124 | 59.086 | 106-98-9 |
| Acetic acid | C2H4O2 | 60.052 | 61.028 | 64-19-7 |
| i+n-Pentane | C5H12 | 72.151 | 73.065 | 109-66-0 |
| Benzene | C6H6 | 78.114 | 79.054 | 71-43-2 |
| Toluene | C7H8 | 92.141 | 93.07 | 108-88-3 |
| Styrene | C8H8 | 104.15 | 105.07 | 100-42-5 |
| Ethanol+xylene | C8H10 | 106.168 | 107.086 | 100-41-4 |
| Trimethylbenzene | C9H12 | 120.195 | 121.101 | 95-63-6 |
| Pollutant | Mean ± standard deviation (ppb) | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| December 6 | December 7 | ||
| Formaldehyde | 1.3 ± 0.2 | 1.2 ± 0.2 | 1.3% |
| Methanol | 17.5 ± 4.1 | 15.1 ± 2.9 | 17.0% |
| Acetonitrile | 1.4 ± 0.4 | 1.3 ± 0.2 | 1.4% |
| Propylene | 4.5 ± 3.7 | 3.7 ± 0.9 | 4.3% |
| Propane | 3.4 ± 0.4 | 3.1 ± 0.4 | 3.4% |
| Acetaldehyde | 8.1 ± 1.7 | 7.6 ± 2.1 | 8.2% |
| Acrylonitrile | 0.2 ± 0.1 | 0.2 ± 0.1 | 0.2% |
| 1,3-Butadiene | 2.6 ± 1.6 | 6.7 ± 10.6 | 4.8% |
| n+i-Butene | 12.3 ± 6.7 | 11.3 ± 2.7 | 12.3% |
| Acetic acid | 9.0 ± 6.8 | 10.1 ± 3.9 | 10.0% |
| i+n-Pentane | 8.0 ± 6.3 | 10.7 ± 4.4 | 9.7% |
| Benzene | 2.3 ± 0.5 | 1.8 ± 0.3 | 2.1% |
| Toluene | 15.1 ± 7.4 | 16.5 ± 3.9 | 16.5% |
| Styrene | 1.1 ± 0.4 | 0.7 ± 0.2 | 1.0% |
| Ethanol+xylene | 7.9 ± 1.6 | 5.1 ± 1.3 | 6.8% |
| Trimethylbenzene | 1.2 ± 0.3 | 0.8 ± 0.2 | 1.1% |
| Pollutant | Mean ± standard deviation (unit: ppb) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| December 6 | December 7 | ||||||
| 1st | 2nd | 3rd | 4th | 5th | 6th | 7th | |
| Formaldehyde | 1.6 ± 0.3 | 1.4 ± 0.3 | 1.2 ± 0.2 | 1.3 ± 0.2 | 1.4 ± 0.3 | 1.3 ± 0.2 | 1.3 ± 0.2 |
| Methanol | 19.7 ± 7.5 | 19.2 ± 9.6 | 10.8 ± 2.2 | 12.2 ± 5.4 | 34.4 ± 102.7 | 14.7 ± 5.7 | 14.9 ± 6.3 |
| Acetonitrile | 1.5 ± 0.4 | 1.3 ± 0.5 | 0.9 ± 0.2 | 1.0 ± 0.2 | 1.5 ± 0.7 | 1.3 ± 0.3 | 2.8 ± 6.0 |
| Propylene | 5.0 ± 2.2 | 4.6 ± 3.0 | 2.2 ± 1.2 | 3.0 ± 2.0 | 6.1 ± 6.4 | 4.0 ± 1.6 | 16.4 ± 46.4 |
| Propane | 4.1 ± 0.5 | 3.7 ± 0.5 | 3.1 ± 0.4 | 3.2 ± 0.4 | 3.7 ± 0.6 | 3.4 ± 0.5 | 3.3 ± 0.4 |
| Acetaldehyde | 12.2 ± 3.44 | 11.9 ± 2.9 | 7.6 ± 1.7 | 8.1 ± 1.4 | 12.4 ± 5.5 | 8.9 ± 2.3 | 10.2 ± 1.4 |
| Acrylonitrile | 0.2 ± 0.1 | 0.2 ± 0.1 | 0.1 ± 0.1 | 0.1 ± 0.1 | 0.2 ± 0.1 | 0.2 ± 0.1 | 0.2 ± 0.1 |
| 1,3-Butadiene | 3.3 ± 2.9 | 2.6 ± 1.5 | 1.4 ± 0.5 | 1.8 ± 0.8 | 2.6 ± 2.0 | 2.1 ± 0.8 | 5.1 ± 12.0 |
| n+i-Butene | 18.6 ± 22.1 | 14.4 ± 8.2 | 10.9 ± 30.0 | 15.9 ± 21.8 | 32.6 ± 57.7 | 15.2 ± 9.5 | 16.5 ± 12.9 |
| Acetic acid | 7.8 ± 8.1 | 12.0 ± 9.2 | 6.4 ± 3.3 | 10.2 ± 8.7 | 20.4 ± 28.0 | 9.2 ± 5.2 | 11.6 ± 8.2 |
| i+n-Pentane | 11.3 ± 24.8 | 9.5 ± 8.0 | 4.5 ± 2.5 | 6.6 ± 2.6 | 11.4 ± 12.5 | 8.7 ± 4.4 | 10.8 ± 7.6 |
| Benzene | 3.2 ± 2.1 | 2.7 ± 1.5 | 1.6 ± 1.1 | 2.3 ± 1.7 | 3.8 ± 3.2 | 2.1 ± 1.6 | 5.0 ± 10.3 |
| Toluene | 28.0 ± 44.5 | 27.5 ± 22.1 | 13.4 ± 28.5 | 21.4 ± 21.6 | 48.3 ± 67.2 | 23.6 ± 18.3 | 45.8 ± 82.1 |
| Styrene | 1.2 ± 0.7 | 1.2 ± 1.5 | 0.7 ± 0.6 | 0.9 ± 0.4 | 5.8 ± 16.9 | 0.9 ± 0.4 | 1.2 ± 1.1 |
| Ethanol+xylene | 10.8 ± 8.6 | 10.1 ± 7.1 | 4.9 ± 3.9 | 8.0 ± 5.2 | 15.5 ± 16.3 | 5.6 ± 4.4 | 12.1 ± 17.8 |
| Trimethylbenzene | 2.1 ± 2.7 | 1.6 ± 0.9 | 0.7 ± 0.1 | 1.4 ± 1.6 | 2.5 ± 3.2 | 1.1 ± 0.7 | 3.2 ± 6.4 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).