Submitted:
03 January 2024
Posted:
04 January 2024
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Green hydrogen
3. Hydrogen's chemical and physical properties
4. Demand for hydrogen
5. Technology for Hydrogen Production
6. Green H2 Production from Renewable Sources
a. Biomass process
- i
- Thermochemical processes
- ii
- Biological Reactions
- iii
- Hydrogen Production Through Methane Catalytic Steam
b. Hydrogen Production from Solar Energy
- i
- Thermochemical
- ii
- Photoelectrochemical
- iii
- Electrochemical
7. Simulation and results
- i
- Cost Summary
- ii
- Electrical Summary

8. Conclusion
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- M. Yu, K. Wang, and H. Vredenburg, “Insights into low-carbon hydrogen production methods: Green, blue and aqua hydrogen,” Int J Hydrogen Energy, vol. 46, no. 41, pp. 21261–21273, 2021. [CrossRef]
- S. Dorel, M. Gmal Osman, C.-V. Strejoiu, and G. Lazaroiu, “Exploring Optimal Charging Strategies for Off-Grid Solar Photovoltaic Systems: A Comparative Study on Battery Storage Techniques,” Batteries, vol. 9, no. 9, p. 470, 2023. [CrossRef]
- G. Lazaroiu, M. Gmal Osman, and C.-V. Strejoiu, “Performance Evaluation of Renewable Energy Systems: Photovoltaic, Wind Turbine, Battery Bank, and Hydrogen Storage,” Batteries, vol. 9, no. 9, p. 468, 2023. [CrossRef]
- A. Poullikkas, “A comparative overview of large-scale battery systems for electricity storage,” Renewable and Sustainable energy reviews, vol. 27, pp. 778–788, 2013. [CrossRef]
- E. Vartiainen, G. Masson, C. Breyer, D. Moser, and E. Román Medina, “Impact of weighted average cost of capital, capital expenditure, and other parameters on future utility-scale PV levelised cost of electricity,” Progress in photovoltaics: research and applications, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 439–453, 2020. [CrossRef]
- B. Lee, C. S. Yoon, H. R. Lee, K. Y. Chung, B. W. Cho, and S. H. Oh, “Electrochemically induced reversible transition from the tunneled to layered polymorphs of manganese dioxide,” Sci Rep, vol. 4, no. 1, p. 6066, 2014. [CrossRef]
- D. Kundu et al., “Organic cathode for aqueous Zn-ion batteries: taming a unique phase evolution toward stable electrochemical cycling,” Chemistry of materials, vol. 30, no. 11, pp. 3874–3881, 2018. [CrossRef]
- S. Verhelst and T. Wallner, “Hydrogen-fueled internal combustion engines,” Prog Energy Combust Sci, vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 490–527, 2009. [CrossRef]
- F. Feng, M. Geng, and D. O. Northwood, “Electrochemical behaviour of intermetallic-based metal hydrides used in Ni/metal hydride (MH) batteries: A review,” Int J Hydrogen Energy, vol. 26, no. 7, pp. 725–734, 2001. [CrossRef]
- M. Guezgouz, J. Jurasz, B. Bekkouche, T. Ma, M. S. Javed, and A. Kies, “Optimal hybrid pumped hydro-battery storage scheme for off-grid renewable energy systems,” Energy Convers Manag, vol. 199, p. 112046, 2019. [CrossRef]
- T. Ohta, Energy carriers and conversion systems with emphasis on hydrogen-volume II, vol. 8. EOLSS Publications, 2009.
- M. G. Osman, D.-A. Ciupagenau, G. Lazaroiu, and I. Pisa, “Increasing Renewable Energy Participation in Sudan,” in 2022 11th International Conference on Renewable Energy Research and Application (ICRERA), 2022, pp. 169–173.
- I. Yüksel, “Hydropower for sustainable water and energy development,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 462–469, 2010. [CrossRef]
- T. da Silva Veras, T. S. Mozer, and A. da Silva César, “Hydrogen: trends, production and characterization of the main process worldwide,” Int J Hydrogen Energy, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 2018–2033, 2017. [CrossRef]
- T. da Silva Veras, T. S. Mozer, and A. da Silva César, “Hydrogen: trends, production and characterization of the main process worldwide,” Int J Hydrogen Energy, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 2018–2033, 2017. [CrossRef]
- M. G. Osman, D. Ciupageanu, and A. Stan, “Analysis of Solar Radiation in Sudan and Optimal Location of Photovoltaic Panels,” UPB Sci. Bull. Series C, vol. 84, pp. 387–401, 2022.
- T. da Silva Veras, T. S. Mozer, and A. da Silva César, “Hydrogen: trends, production and characterization of the main process worldwide,” Int J Hydrogen Energy, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 2018–2033, 2017. [CrossRef]
- B. Bhandari, K.-T. Lee, C. S. Lee, C.-K. Song, R. K. Maskey, and S.-H. Ahn, “A novel off-grid hybrid power system comprised of solar photovoltaic, wind, and hydro energy sources,” Appl Energy, vol. 133, pp. 236–242, 2014. [CrossRef]
- A. Borgschulte, A. Züttel, and U. Wittstadt, “Hydrogen production,” Hydrogen as a future energy carrier, pp. 149–164, 2008.
- B. H. E. Outlook, “Hydrogen Economy Outlook: Key messages.” 2020.
- M. Yu, K. Wang, and H. Vredenburg, “Insights into low-carbon hydrogen production methods: Green, blue and aqua hydrogen,” Int J Hydrogen Energy, vol. 46, no. 41, pp. 21261–21273, 2021. [CrossRef]
- I. Dincer, “Green methods for hydrogen production,” Int J Hydrogen Energy, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 1954–1971, 2012. [CrossRef]
- H. Balat and E. Kırtay, “Hydrogen from biomass–present scenario and future prospects,” Int J Hydrogen Energy, vol. 35, no. 14, pp. 7416–7426, 2010. [CrossRef]
- A. Kovač, M. Paranos, and D. Marciuš, “Hydrogen in energy transition: A review,” Int J Hydrogen Energy, vol. 46, no. 16, pp. 10016–10035, 2021. [CrossRef]
- D. Iribarren, M. Martín-Gamboa, J. Manzano, and J. Dufour, “Assessing the social acceptance of hydrogen for transportation in Spain: An unintentional focus on target population for a potential hydrogen economy,” Int J Hydrogen Energy, vol. 41, no. 10, pp. 5203–5208, 2016. [CrossRef]
- L. Schlapbach and A. Borgschulte, Hydrogen as a Future Energy Carrier. Wiley-VCH, 2008.
- R. W. Coughlin and M. Farooque, “Hydrogen production from coal, water and electrons,” Nature, vol. 279, no. 5711, pp. 301–303, 1979. [CrossRef]
- K. Nagasawa, F. T. Davidson, A. C. Lloyd, and M. E. Webber, “Impacts of renewable hydrogen production from wind energy in electricity markets on potential hydrogen demand for light-duty vehicles,” Appl Energy, vol. 235, pp. 1001–1016, 2019. [CrossRef]
- J. Ivy, “Summary of electrolytic hydrogen production: milestone completion report,” National Renewable Energy Lab., Golden, CO (US), 2004.
- H. K. Abdel-Aal, M. Sadik, M. Bassyouni, and M. Shalabi, “A new approach to utilize hydrogen as a safe fuel,” Int J Hydrogen Energy, vol. 30, no. 13–14, pp. 1511–1514, 2005. [CrossRef]
- S. A. Sherif, F. Barbir, and T. N. Veziroglu, “Wind energy and the hydrogen economy—review of the technology,” Solar energy, vol. 78, no. 5, pp. 647–660, 2005. [CrossRef]
- P. Fragiacomo and M. Genovese, “Modeling and energy demand analysis of a scalable green hydrogen production system,” Int J Hydrogen Energy, vol. 44, no. 57, pp. 30237–30255, 2019. [CrossRef]
- G. L. Juste, “Hydrogen injection as additional fuel in gas turbine combustor. Evaluation of effects,” Int J Hydrogen Energy, vol. 31, no. 14, pp. 2112–2121, 2006. [CrossRef]
- C.-L. Tseng et al., “Numerical analysis of the solar reactor design for a photoelectrochemical hydrogen production system,” Int J Hydrogen Energy, vol. 37, no. 17, pp. 13053–13059, 2012. [CrossRef]
- A. Midilli and I. Dincer, “Hydrogen as a renewable and sustainable solution in reducing global fossil fuel consumption,” Int J Hydrogen Energy, vol. 33, no. 16, pp. 4209–4222, 2008. [CrossRef]
- M. Balat, “Potential importance of hydrogen as a future solution to environmental and transportation problems,” Int J Hydrogen Energy, vol. 33, no. 15, pp. 4013–4029, 2008. [CrossRef]
- A. V. Abad and P. E. Dodds, “Green hydrogen characterisation initiatives: Definitions, standards, guarantees of origin, and challenges,” Energy Policy, vol. 138, p. 111300, 2020. [CrossRef]
- D. J. Jovan and G. Dolanc, “Can green hydrogen production be economically viable under current market conditions,” Energies (Basel), vol. 13, no. 24, p. 6599, 2020. [CrossRef]
- C. Zamfirescu and I. Dincer, “Ammonia as a green fuel and hydrogen source for vehicular applications,” Fuel processing technology, vol. 90, no. 5, pp. 729–737, 2009. [CrossRef]
- J. Manna, P. Jha, R. Sarkhel, C. Banerjee, A. K. Tripathi, and M. R. Nouni, “Opportunities for green hydrogen production in petroleum refining and ammonia synthesis industries in India,” Int J Hydrogen Energy, vol. 46, no. 77, pp. 38212–38231, 2021. [CrossRef]
- M. Yue, H. Lambert, E. Pahon, R. Roche, S. Jemei, and D. Hissel, “Hydrogen energy systems: A critical review of technologies, applications, trends and challenges,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 146, p. 111180, 2021. [CrossRef]
- S. Kar, R. C. Bindal, S. Prabhakar, and P. K. Tewari, “The application of membrane reactor technology in hydrogen production using S–I thermochemical process: A roadmap,” Int J Hydrogen Energy, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 3612–3620, 2012. [CrossRef]
- S. Z. Baykara, “Hydrogen production by direct solar thermal decomposition of water, possibilities for improvement of process efficiency,” Int J Hydrogen Energy, vol. 29, no. 14, pp. 1451–1458, 2004. [CrossRef]
- M. Momirlan and T. N. Veziroglu, “The properties of hydrogen as fuel tomorrow in sustainable energy system for a cleaner planet,” Int J Hydrogen Energy, vol. 30, no. 7, pp. 795–802, 2005. [CrossRef]
- E. Gupta et al., “Hydrogen as a renewable and sustainable solution in reducing global fossil fuel consumption,” Energy Policy, vol. 36, no. 16, pp. 4209–4222, 2008. [CrossRef]
- K. Meier, “Hydrogen production with sea water electrolysis using Norwegian offshore wind energy potentials: Techno-economic assessment for an offshore-based hydrogen production approach with state-of-the-art technology,” International Journal of Energy and Environmental Engineering, vol. 5, pp. 1–12, 2014. [CrossRef]
- P. G. Panah, X. Cui, M. Bornapour, R.-A. Hooshmand, and J. M. Guerrero, “Marketability analysis of green hydrogen production in Denmark: Scale-up effects on grid-connected electrolysis,” Int J Hydrogen Energy, vol. 47, no. 25, pp. 12443–12455, 2022. [CrossRef]
- A. Ozawa, Y. Kudoh, A. Murata, T. Honda, I. Saita, and H. Takagi, “Hydrogen in low-carbon energy systems in Japan by 2050: The uncertainties of technology development and implementation,” Int J Hydrogen Energy, vol. 43, no. 39, pp. 18083–18094, 2018. [CrossRef]
- R. S. El-Emam and H. Özcan, “Comprehensive review on the techno-economics of sustainable large-scale clean hydrogen production,” J Clean Prod, vol. 220, pp. 593–609, 2019. [CrossRef]
- R. Rath, P. Kumar, S. Mohanty, and S. K. Nayak, “Recent advances, unsolved deficiencies, and future perspectives of hydrogen fuel cells in transportation and portable sectors,” Int J Energy Res, no. May, pp. 8931–8955, 2019. [CrossRef]
- A. K. M. Tarigan and S. B. Bayer, “Temporal change analysis of public attitude, knowledge and acceptance of hydrogen vehicles in Greater Stavanger, 2006–2009,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 16, no. 8, pp. 5535–5544, 2012. [CrossRef]
- C.-C. Chen, H.-H. Tseng, Y.-L. Lin, and W.-H. Chen, “Hydrogen production and carbon dioxide enrichment from ethanol steam reforming followed by water gas shift reaction,” J Clean Prod, vol. 162, pp. 1430–1441, 2017. [CrossRef]
- K. Im-orb, N. Visitdumrongkul, D. Saebea, Y. Patcharavorachot, and A. Arpornwichanop, “Flowsheet-based model and exergy analysis of solid oxide electrolysis cells for clean hydrogen production,” J Clean Prod, vol. 170, pp. 1–13, 2018. [CrossRef]
- M. Babayan, A. E. Mazraeh, M. Yari, N. A. Niazi, and S. C. Saha, “Hydrogen production with a photovoltaic thermal system enhanced by phase change materials, Shiraz, Iran case study,” J Clean Prod, vol. 215, pp. 1262–1278, 2019. [CrossRef]
- F. Ali, A. Bennui, S. Chowdhury, and K. Techato, “Suitable Site Selection for Solar-Based Green Hydrogen in Southern Thailand Using GIS-MCDM Approach,” Sustainability, vol. 14, no. 11, p. 6597, 2022. [CrossRef]
- E. Haghi, K. Raahemifar, and M. Fowler, “Investigating the effect of renewable energy incentives and hydrogen storage on advantages of stakeholders in a microgrid,” Energy Policy, vol. 113, pp. 206–222, 2018. [CrossRef]
- O. Nematollahi, P. Alamdari, M. Jahangiri, A. Sedaghat, and A. A. Alemrajabi, “A techno-economical assessment of solar/wind resources and hydrogen production: A case study with GIS maps,” Energy, vol. 175, pp. 914–930, 2019. [CrossRef]
- B. Liu, S. Liu, S. Guo, and S. Zhang, “Economic study of a large-scale renewable hydrogen application utilizing surplus renewable energy and natural gas pipeline transportation in China,” Int J Hydrogen Energy, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 1385–1398, 2020. [CrossRef]
- Y. Zhao, Y. Zhang, W. Li, Y. Hao, and H. Jin, “Experimental investigation and thermodynamic analysis of effective hydrogen production driven by mid-and low-temperature solar heat,” J Clean Prod, vol. 176, pp. 758–769, 2018. [CrossRef]
- S. K. Ngoh, L. M. A. Ohandja, A. Kemajou, and L. Monkam, “Design and simulation of hybrid solar high-temperature hydrogen production system using both solar photovoltaic and thermal energy,” Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, vol. 7, pp. 279–293, 2014. [CrossRef]
- K. Hashimoto et al., “The use of renewable energy in the form of methane via electrolytic hydrogen generation using carbon dioxide as the feedstock,” Appl Surf Sci, vol. 388, pp. 608–615, 2016. [CrossRef]
- O. M. Babatunde, J. L. Munda, and Y. Hamam, “Off-grid hybrid photovoltaic–micro wind turbine renewable energy system with hydrogen and battery storage: Effects of sun tracking technologies,” Energy Convers Manag, vol. 255, p. 115335, 2022. [CrossRef]
- S. Fukaume, Y. Nagasaki, and M. Tsuda, “Stable power supply of an independent power source for a remote island using a Hybrid Energy Storage System composed of electric and hydrogen energy storage systems,” Int J Hydrogen Energy, vol. 47, no. 29, pp. 13887–13899, 2022.
- R. Abejón et al., “Hydrogen recovery from waste gas streams to feed (High-temperature PEM) fuel cells: Environmental performance under a life cycle thinking approach,” Applied Sciences, vol. 10, no. 21, p. 7461, 2020. [CrossRef]
- B. Olateju and A. Kumar, “Techno-economic assessment of hydrogen production from underground coal gasification (UCG) in Western Canada with carbon capture and sequestration (CCS) for upgrading bitumen from oil sands,” Appl Energy, vol. 111, pp. 428–440, 2013. [CrossRef]
- I. Abadlia, T. Bahi, and H. Bouzeria, “Energy management strategy based on fuzzy logic for compound RES/ESS used in stand-alone application,” Int J Hydrogen Energy, vol. 41, no. 38, pp. 16705–16717, 2016. [CrossRef]
- M. S. Yazici, H. A. Yavasoglu, and M. Eroglu, “A mobile off-grid platform powered with photovoltaic/wind/battery/fuel cell hybrid power systems,” Int J Hydrogen Energy, vol. 38, no. 26, pp. 11639–11645, 2013. [CrossRef]


















| Method | Source | Brief description | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary energy | Material | ||
| M1 Electrolysis | Electrical | Water | Direct current divides water into O2 and H2 (electrochemical reaction) |
| M2 Plasma arc decomposition | Fossil fuels | The plasma arc is used to create H2 and carbon soot from cleaned natural gas. | |
| M3 Thermolysis | Thermal | Water | Thermal breakdown of water (steam) occurs above 2500 K. |
| M4 Thermochemical processes | Water splitting | Water | Chemical reactions that occur in cycles (net reaction: water splitting into H2). |
| M5 Biomass conversion | Biomass | Thermostatic conversion. | |
| M6 Gasification | Synthesis of gas from biomass | ||
| M7 Reforming | H2 production from liquid biomass (biofuels). | ||
| M8 PV electrolysis | photonic | Water | Electricity is produced using PV panels. |
| M9 Photocatalysis | The photocatalyst produces an electron-hole pair that is utilized to convert water into H2. | ||
| M10 Photoelectrochemical method | When light is absorbed by a hybrid cell, current and voltage are produced simultaneously. | ||
| M11 Dark fermentation | Biochemical | Biomass | Without light, biological mechanisms are used to produce H2. |
| M12 High-temperature electrolysis | Electrical + Thermal | Water | Water splitting is fueled by the combination of thermal and electrical energy at high temperatures. |
| M13 Hybrid thermochemical cycles | Cycles of chemical reactions are driven by the combination of electrical and thermal energy. | ||
| M14 Coal gasification | Conversion of coal into syngas | ||
| M15 Fossil fuel reforming | The conversion of fossil fuels into H2 and CO2 | ||
| M16 Bio photolysis | Photonic + Biochemical | Biomass + Water | H2 is produced by biological processes (bacteria, microorganisms, etc.). |
| M17 Photo fermentation | The light activates the fermentation process. | ||
| M18 Artificial photosynthesis | To generate H2, chemically engineered systems mimic photosynthesis. | ||
| M19 Photo electrolysis | Electrical +Photonic | Water | Water electrolysis is powered by photoelectrodes and external electricity. |
| Method | Thermochemical | Photoelectrochemical | Electrochemical |
|---|---|---|---|
| Efficiency [%] | 40% - 50% depending on the thermochemical cycle and temperature | 12.7% -18.2% Slope of solar irradiance and forbidden energy band for electrode material | 73% -85% depending on the type of electrolysis process and LHV or HHV basis |
| Application | applications for stationary large-scale generation of thermal electricity. | Hydrogen refueling stations are advantageous because they require fewer procedures, do not require external power sources, and do not require additional hydrogen distribution systems. | Mobile applications for transportation Mobile and fixed applications for both large- and small-scale hydrogen production using a distance |
| Operation pressure | 20 - 50 bar | atmospheric | atmospheric |
| Temperature [0C] | >500oC | 374 oC | 70 oC |
| Energy Input | Thermal | Electrical | Electrical |
| Basic components | More than 3 thermals reactors |
2 electrodes and electrolyte | Electrodes, electrolytes, and sunlight |
| Methods of water splitting | Thermal splitting | Potential | Potential |
| Component | Name | Size | Unit |
|---|---|---|---|
| Generator | Fuel Cell | 20.0 | kW |
| PV | PV | 120 | kW |
| Electrolyzer | Electrolyzer | 50.0 | kW |
| Hydrogen tank | Hydrogen Tank | 120 | kg |
| Dispatch strategy | HOMER Load Following |
| Name | Capital | Operating | Replacement | Salvage | Resource | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Electrolyzer | $100,000 | $0.00 | $56,158 | -$12,742 | $0.00 | $143,416 |
| Fuel Cell | $60,000 | $176,395 | $106,523 | -$11,482 | $0.00 | $331,436 |
| Hydrogen Tank | $180,000 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $180,000 |
| PV | $360,000 | $18,903 | $166,797 | -$103,210 | $0.00 | $442,490 |
| System | $700,000 | $195,298 | $329,478 | -$127,434 | $0.00 | $1.10M |
| Name | Capital | Operating | Replacement | Salvage | Resource | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Electrolyzer | $6,348 | $0.00 | $3,565 | -$808.89 | $0.00 | $9,104 |
| Fuel Cell | $3,809 | $11,198 | $6,762 | -$728.91 | $0.00 | $21,040 |
| Hydrogen Tank | $11,427 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $11,427 |
| PV | $22,854 | $1,200 | $10,589 | -$6,552 | $0.00 | $28,090 |
| System | $44,438 | $12,398 | $20,916 | -$8,090 | $0.00 | $69,662 |
| Quantity | Value | Units |
|---|---|---|
| Excess Electricity | 17,752 | kWh/Year |
| Unmet Electric Load | 637 | kWh/Year |
| Capacity Shortage | 739 | kWh/Year |
| Component | Production (kWh/Year) | Percent |
|---|---|---|
| PV | 151,514 | 81.6 |
| Fuel Cell | 34,169 | 18.4 |
| Total | 185,683 | 100 |
| Component | Consumption (kWh/Year) | Percent |
|---|---|---|
| AC Primary Load | 0 | 0 |
| DC Primary Load | 72,363 | 43.1 |
| Deferrable Load | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 167,932 | 100 |
| Quantity | Value | Units |
|---|---|---|
| Electrical Production | 34,169 | kWh/Year |
| Mean Electrical Output | 6.10 | kW |
| Minimum Electrical Output | 0.00459 | kW |
| Maximum Electrical Output | 13.0 | kW |
| Fuel Consumption | 2,050 | kg |
| Specific Fuel Consumption | 0.0600 | kg/kWh |
| Fuel Energy Input | 68,338 | kWh/Year |
| Mean Electrical Efficiency | 50.0 | % |
| Hours of Operation | 5,599 | Hourss/Year |
| Number of Starts | 369 | starts/Year |
| Operational Life | 7.14 | Year |
| Capacity Factor | 19.5 | % |
| Fixed Generation Cost | 3.50 | $/Hours |
| Marginal Generation Cost | 0 | $/kWh |
| Quantity | Value | Units |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum Output | 0 | kW |
| Maximum Output | 106 | kW |
| PV Penetration | 208 | % |
| Hours of Operation | 4,210 | Hourss/Year |
| Levelized Cost | 0.185 | $/kWh |
| Rated Capacity | 120 | kW |
| Mean Output | 17.3 | kW |
| Mean Output | 415 | kWh/d |
| Capacity Factor | 14.4 | % |
| Total Production | 151,514 | kWh/Year |
| Quantity | Value | Units |
|---|---|---|
| Mean output | 0.235 | kg/Hours |
| Minimum Output | 0 | kg/Hours |
| Maximum Output | 1.08 | kg/Hours |
| Total production | 2,059 | kg/Year |
| Specific consumption | 46.4 | kWh/kg |
| Rated capacity | 50.0 | kW |
| Mean input | 10.9 | kW |
| Minimum input | 0 | kW |
| Maximum input | 50.0 | kW |
| Total input energy | 95,568 | kWh/Year |
| Capacity Factor | 21.8 | % |
| Hours of operation | 3,106 | Hours/Year |
| Quantity | Value | Units |
|---|---|---|
| Hydrogen storage capacity | 120 | kg |
| Energy storage capacity | 4,000 | kWh |
| Tank autonomy | 480 | Hours |
| Content at beginning of year | 12.0 | kg |
| Content at end of year | 21.3 | kg |
| Quantity | Value | Units |
|---|---|---|
| Total fuel consumed | 2,050 | kg |
| Avg fuel per day | 5.62 | kg/day |
| Avg fuel per hour | 0.234 | kg/hour |
| Pollutant | Quantity | Unit |
|---|---|---|
| Carbon Dioxide | -20.9 | kg/Year |
| Carbon Monoxide | 13.3 | kg/Year |
| Unburned Hydrocarbons | 1.48 | kg/Year |
| Particulate Matter | 1.00 | kg/Year |
| Sulfur Dioxide | 0 | kg/Year |
| Nitrogen Oxides | 119 | kg/Year |
| Capacity-based metrics | Value | Unit |
|---|---|---|
| Nominal renewable capacity divided by total nominal capacity | 85.7 | % |
| Usable renewable capacity divided by total capacity | 84.4 | % |
| Energy-based metrics | Value | Unit |
| Total renewable production divided by load | 90.2 | % |
| Total renewable production divided by generation | 81.6 | % |
| One minus total nonrenewable production divided by load | 79.7 | % |
| Peak values | Value | Unit |
| Renewable output divided by load (HOMER standard) | 953 | % |
| Renewable output divided by total generation | 100 | % |
| One minus nonrenewable output divided by total load | 100 | % |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).