Preprint
Article

This version is not peer-reviewed.

A Genome-Wide Association Study for Resistance to Tropical Theileriosis in Two Bovine Portuguese Autochthonous Breeds

A peer-reviewed article of this preprint also exists.

Submitted:

12 December 2023

Posted:

13 December 2023

You are already at the latest version

Abstract
Control of Tropical Theileriosis, a tick-borne disease with a strong impact on cattle breeding, can be facilitated by using marker-assisted selection in breeding programs. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) using high-density arrays are extremely important for the ongoing process of identifying genomic variants associated with resistance to Theileria annulata infection. In this work, Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) were analyzed in the Portuguese autochthonous cattle breeds Alentejana and Mertolenga. In total, 14 SNPs suggestive of significance (p ≤ 10-4) were identified for Alentejana cattle and 20 SNPs for Mertolenga cattle. The genomic regions around these SNPs were further investigated for annotated genes and Quantitative trait loci (QTLs) previously described by other authors. Regarding the Alentejana breed, the MAP3K1, CMTM7, SSFA2, and ATG13 genes are located near suggestive SNPs and appear as candidate genes for resistance to Tropical Theileriosis, considering its action the immune response and resistance to other diseases. On the other hand, in the Mertolenga breed, the UOX gene is also a candidate gene due to its apparent link to the pathogenesis of the disease. These results may represent a first step towards the possibility of including genetic markers for resistance to Tropical Theileriosis in current breed selection programs.
Keywords: 
;  ;  

1. Introduction

Tropical Theileriosis is a tick-borne disease caused by a haemoprotozoan, Theileria annulata, which affects cattle production in Europe, Asia, and Africa [1]. This parasite can affect the host’s immune system and cause damage to red blood cells, leading to varying degrees of anemia [2]. This will result in production shortfalls and increased mortality and morbidity rates of parasitized animals. Thus, tropical theileriosis causes economic losses associated with reduced production capacity and the need to carry out control, for example, through the use of acaricides [3].
Theileriosis control strategies may include curing affected animals and prevention [4]. Curing affected animals can be difficult and involves the administration of substances such as imidocarb, erythromycin, oxytetracycline, quinozoline, and naphthoquinone derivatives (parvaquone and buparvaquone), whose efficacy is questionable [5,6,7]. In addition, buparvaquone, for example, can leave residues in animal products such as meat and milk, implying long safety intervals, and its use is therefore limited in several countries, including European countries, where its use is not approved by the EMA (European Medicines Agency) [5,8]. In an attempt at control, where it is difficult to achieve a cure, it is possible to resort to culling affected animals, although this results in significant economic losses for the farm [4]. As for prevention, this can be based on strategies that include control of ticks (e.g. use of acaricides), the environment (e.g. biosecurity measures and avoiding movement of animals from non-endemic to endemic areas), and the animal (e.g. selection of resistant animals and use of vaccines) [4,5]. The use of acaricides in the control of ticks and tick-borne diseases is one of the main strategies used, but it is costly [4]. In addition, increasing acaricide resistance is also a concern in the implementation of this control strategy [4,7,9]. Acaricide resistance results from the selection of specific heritable traits in a tick population, resulting from exposure of the population to an acaricide. As a result, there will be an increase in the number of ticks that survive after administration of the recommended dose of the same acaricide to which resistance already exists [9]. In turn, the use of vaccines, an animal-based control strategy, also has some limitations. The only vaccines that appear to be effective are live attenuated vaccines, but more research is needed to fully understand their mechanism of action [5,7]. Subunit vaccines are difficult to obtain, considering the genetic diversity of these parasites [5]. Finally, the use of resistant animals could be another, more sustainable, strategy to minimize the impact of the disease [6,8].
The use of animals that are genetically tolerant/resistant to ticks and tick-borne diseases is thus considered the most natural control alternative [10]. Natural disease resistance refers to the inherent ability of an animal to resist diseases when exposed to pathogens without prior exposure or immunization [4]. Several authors have reported that cattle of autochthonous breeds from endemic regions are more resistant than those of exotic breeds [3,11,12,13]. For example, different responses to T. annulata infection have been identified in the Sahiwal breed (B. indicus) and the Holstein breed (B. taurus) [11,14].
An important prerequisite in breeding strategies for disease tolerance/resistance is the attempt to understand the genetic control mechanisms of diseases. Nowadays, it is known that tick loads in cattle have moderate to high levels of heritability, which can range from 0.40 to 0.54 [15,16]. In addition, some haemoparasitoses such as those caused by Anaplasma marginale and Ehrlichia ruminantium appear to have significant heritabilities, with values of 0.16 and 0.19, respectively [17]. Genome-wide association studies have been conducted for some vector-borne diseases [10]. In addition, single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) have been tested to identify genetic variants associated with complex traits. SNPs distributed throughout the genome can detect and map mutations underlying variation in target traits by a process called genome-wide association analysis (GWAS) [18]. GWAS allows to identification of genetic markers, candidate genes, and QTLs for individual traits. The discovery of Quantitative Trait Locus (QTL) is an important step in identifying and understanding genetic variants associated with economically important phenotypes, and genome-wide association study (GWAS) has become a widely used approach for identifying QTLs and genome regions associated with phenotypes [19]. High-density arrays capable of genotyping thousands of SNPs are already available for cattle, allowing for increased genomic coverage and statistical power [20].
In this study, we performed a GWAS using a high-density array to identify SNP genetic markers for resistance to Tropical Theileriosis in cattle of the Portuguese autochthonous breeds Alentejana and Mertolenga and to identify the genes or genomic regions that are most likely involved in tolerance/resistance to Tropical Theileriosis. Both breeds are officially at risk of extinction and have conservation and improvement programs. The data obtained in this work could be important information to be included in these breed improvement programs.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sample collection and selection of phenotypically extreme animals

The blood samples used in this study were collected in the Alentejo region of Portugal, the country’s leading beef producing region, with more than 65% of national production. This region is the place of origin of the Portuguese autochthonous breeds under study, namely the Alentejana and the Mertolenga breeds, and is also an endemic region for T. annulata [21]. The Alentejana and Mertolenga breeds belong to a group of 15 autochthonous Portuguese cattle breeds and are at risk of extinction [22]. The Alentejana cattle breed has around 22 000 breeding females registered in the herd book, spread over around 174 farms, although only around 8 000 are purebred, and the rest are used for crossbreeding with males from exotic international breeds [23]. On the other hand, the Mertolenga cattle breed, which currently has 27 000 breeding females, is the largest of Portugal’s 15 autochthonous breeds. As with the Alentejana breed, only around 8 000 females are purebred, the rest being used to crossbreed with males from exotic international breeds [24].
Initially, 843 blood samples were randomly collected from purebred Alentejana and Mertolenga cattle, which did not show any clinical signs of T. annulata infection. The collections were carried out between November 2018 and December 2019, in 420 Alentejana breed animals and 423 Mertolenga breed animals. These animals all belong to farms with extensive or semi-extensive production regimes, so these animals live outdoors and on pasture.
Between 3 and 5 mL of blood were collected from the jugular vein of each animal and stored individually in tubes containing EDTA (ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid). This blood sampling was carried out by the technicians of the cattle associations of the autochthonous breeds under study. The tubes containing the blood sample were frozen at -20°C before being sent to the laboratory. During transport and storage, the temperature conditions were maintained.
Initially, these samples were analyzed at the Molecular Genetics Laboratory of the National Institute for Agricultural and Veterinary Research (INIAV). In the laboratory, 300 µL of each of the 843 blood samples were used to perform DNA extraction using the Cytogene® Blood Kit (India, Cytogene), following the manufacturer’s instructions. Thereafter, DNA from each sample was subjected to amplification with Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) of a fragment, with about 319 base pairs (bp), of a T. annulata merozoite-piroplasm surface antigen gene, Tams 1 [25]. In all reactions, were used a negative sample of T. annulata (negative control), without DNA, and a positive sample (positive control), property of the Parasitology Laboratory of the INIAV. The amplified samples were analyzed by 1.5% agarose gel electrophoresis, and the gel was visualized with an ultraviolet (UV) transilluminator. Positive and negative PCR controls were introduced in each PCR and a molecular weight marker (NZYDNA VI) was placed on each gel. Samples were classified as positive (samples infected with T. annulata, with the presence of Tams 1 gene) and negative (samples not infected with T. annulata, without the presence of the Tams 1 gene). From the 843 blood samples analyzed, 96 samples from animals of the Alentejana breed and 96 samples from animals of the Mertolenga breed were selected. In the case of the animals of the Alentejana breed, all the samples positive for T. annulata (30 samples) were used and the farms to which they belonged were identified. The remaining 66 negative samples were selected from the same farms as the previous ones. In the case of the Mertolenga breed, we used 48 samples from infected animals and 48 samples from non-infected animals (n = 96), selecting the latter based on the farm to which the infected animals belonged. The presence of the Tams 1 gene (infected animals) or its absence (non-infected animals) were the phenotypic extremes considered in our study. Thus, infected animals, with the presence of the Tams 1 gene in the blood sample, were considered susceptible to Tropical Theileriosis, while non-infected animals, without the presence of the Tams 1 gene in the blood sample, were considered resistant to Tropical Theileriosis.

2.2. SNP genotyping and GWAS analysis

All 192 samples were genotyped in two plates of 96 samples of the Axiom™ Bovine Genotyping 100K Array, one plate for each breed, in a laboratory providing animal health and food safety services (Segalab, Portugal), following the best practices workflow from the manufacturer. The “BestandRecommended” SNPs were selected for the analysis of both breeds. PLINK v1.9 was used for quality control [26]. SNPs were filtered out whenever the minor allele frequency (--maf) was below 5% and missing data (--geno) was higher than 10%. Similarly, samples were filtered out when there was 10% or more missing data (--mind). To account for population structure, samples were filtered based on cryptic relatedness (--min 0.2), and their distribution was inferred by means of a principal component analysis (--pca var-wts). Whenever a principal component was responsible for a significative separation of samples into groups, which was not expected from sample records, it was used as a covariate for the association analysis. Genome-wide association analysis was performed in PLINK under the logistic model for disease traits (--logistic). Case/control phenotypes for T. annulata were included in the phenotypes files (--pheno). The origin of each sample, namely its breeder or the district of provenance, was used as a covariate (--covar). The association was evaluated using quantile-quantile plots. The p-values for all SNPs were adjusted for false discovery rate (FDR). Also, the threshold of significance was calculated following the Bonferroni correction.

2.3. Data analysis

Data analysis was supported by querying the Bovine Mine and National Center for Biotechnology Information databases [27,28]. When analyzing the data using these databases, the aim was to identify the overlap of suggestive SNPs with possible genes and QTLs or to identify genes in their vicinity.

3. Results

3.1. Descriptive statistics

In the sample initially used (n = 843), it was possible to find positivity to T. annulata of 7.10% (30/420) in Alentejana animals and 14.4% (61/423) in Mertolenga animals [21]. As mentioned above, we selected 96 Alentejana animals and 96 Mertolenga animals, whose characteristics are described in the table below (Table 1).

3.2. Genome-wide associations

To identify SNP genetic markers and QTLs for resistance to Tropical Theileriosis, we performed a GWAS using a genotyping approach. After implementing data quality control measures, out of the 100 000 SNPs on the array, 75 126 SNPs were used in the association test for the Alentejana breed and 81 357 SNPs for the Mertolenga breed, and the analysis was performed for each breed separately.
Considering an initial p-value ≤ 0.05, it was possible to find 7 833 significant SNPs in the Alentejana breed, and 7 157 significant SNPs in the Mertolenga breed. All SNPs were classified as non-significant based on the adjusted p-values after FDR. Furthermore, the Bonferroni correction also established a threshold of significance lower than the lowest p-value found. Despite this, based on other GWAS works available in the literature, it was decided that the suggestive value of significance to be used in this work would be p-value ≤ 10-4 (Figure 1) [29,30,31]. Thus, it was possible to find 24 significant SNPs for Alentejana cattle and 20 significant SNPs for Mertolenga cattle (Table 2). In this table, we can see that for both breeds, the protective allele of the identified SNPs appears in a higher percentage in the animals under study. Thus, we found that the protective allele appears more frequently in 75% of the SNPs studied in the Alentejana breed and 80% of the SNPs studied in the Mertolenga breed.
For the Alentejana breed, considering the 24 SNPs suggestive of genomic significance for resistance to Tropical Theileriosis, it was not possible to find any overlapping QTLs. On the other hand, in the case of the Mertolenga breed, considering the 20 SNPs suggestive of genomic significance, 7 QTLs were found in the vicinity of the suggestive SNPs, distributed over 4 chromosomes (chromosomes 3, 7, 8, and 29) (Table 3).
In addition to the identification of QTLs based on SNPs suggestive of genomic significance, the genes where these SNPs overlapped with or the genes upstream and downstream of them, in the case of intergenic variants, were also considered. Thus, it was possible to identify different genes on chromosomes 2, 4, 6, 9, 12, 15, 16, 17, 20, 22, 25, and 26 for the Alentejana breed (Table 4), and on chromosomes 3, 4, 7, 8, 10, 11, 12, 13, 21, and 29 for the Mertolenga breed (Table 5).

4. Discussion

In this work, GWAS was performed using a high-density bovine SNP’s array that allowed the identification of 24 significant SNP’s for Alentejana breed cattle and 20 significant SNP’s for Mertolenga breed cattle (p ≤ 10-4). For these SNPs, in both breeds, we found that the protective allele is the most prevalent. In addition, only in the case of the Mertolenga breed it was possible to identify 7 QTLs already described, associated with SNPs suggestive of resistance/susceptibility to Theileriosis. These QTLs are associated with traits such as average daily gain, muscle carnosine, creatine and creatinine content, body weight at birth, larger muscle area, and percentage of glycated kappa-casein in milk. These data are extremely important because the genetic selection of animals may consider important health traits but cannot neglect the productive traits of these animals. Thus, it is important to use these QTLs to enhance genetic and economic gains by incorporating the information obtained into breeding programs. Thus, these programs may allow the selection animals with higher combined economic value for the next generation by combining productive and non-productive traits, such as resistance to Theileriosis [36].
It was also possible to identify several annotated genes that overlap with the suggestive SNPs from GWAS, or in their vicinity. For the Alentejana breed, it was possible to find genes associated with the regulation of cell proliferation, differentiation and survival, such as EGFR (epidermal growth factor receptor), cell growth such as DCHS2 (dachsous cadherin-related 2), and the formation of plasma cation channels such as TRPC3 (transient receptor potential cation channel subfamily C member 3) [37,38,39]. In addition to these functions at the cellular level, of the genes described, the MAP3K1 (mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase 1) gene was identified, which acts in the MAPK pathway, a signal transduction pathway that modulates physiological and pathophysiological cellular responses. In this pathway, mitogen-activated protein kinases regulate important cellular processes such as proliferation, stress response, apoptosis, and immune defense, regulating the production of T helper 1 (Th1) and T helper 2 (Th2) lymphocyte responses. Currently, the ability of protozoan parasites such as Trypanosoma cruzi, Trypanosoma congolense and Leishmania spp. to modulate the host immune response by intervening in the MAPK pathway to favor their replication and survival has been described [40,41]. Another gene recognized was CMTM7 (KLF like MARVEL transmembrane domain containing 7), which belongs to the superfamily encoding chemokine like factors. Lack of CMTM7 has already been shown to cause a reduction in the innate B-cell population and lead to natural IgM and IL-10 deficiency [42]. IL 10 is one of the interleukins present in the highest concentration when cattle are infected with T. annulata and is essential in the development of the immune response against this agent [43]. In turn, the SSFA2 (sperm specific antigen 2) gene was identified, whose presence has already been reported to be associated with greater resistance to the development of clinical mastitis in cattle [44]. In addition to all these, the ATG13 (autophagy related 13) gene was also identified, as responsible for cellular autophagy, i.e. programmed cell death when cells are aged, degenerated, or non-functional. The action of this gene in the autophagy process in cells infected with the Bovine Viral Diarrhea Virus (BVDv) has already been described [45]. BVDv is an intracellular pathogen, at a certain stage of its cycle, like T. annulata [46].
Interestingly, two genes were identified in the group of Alentejana animals that seem to be associated with neurotransmitter concentration. It is known that the abnormal concentration of neurotransmitters is one of the factors that affect the health status, temperament, and welfare of animals, but the genetic basis of this abnormality is still unknown [47]. Despite this, there are already references that the PCDH15 gene (protocadherin related 15), which was identified in this work, may be associated with the regulation of this concentration. On the other hand, it was also possible to identify the LOC107133268 gene (protocadherin-16-like), whose functions are not yet fully described in cattle, but the homolog, in humans, seems to be involved in the modulation of synaptic transmission and the generation of specific synaptic connections [48]. In addition, the genes LOC107133203 (olfactory receptor 1S1-like) and LOC104974344 (olfactory receptor 10Q1), which encode olfactory receptor proteins responsible for the recognition and transduction of olfactory signals, have also been identified and can trigger a neuronal response that triggers the perception of an odor [49].
In addition, were identified genes potentially associated with resistance to Theileriosis in Alentejana breed animals that appear to have significant productive importance, such as the ATP12A (ATPase H/K transporting non-gastric alpha2 subunit), SHISA9 (shisa family member 9) and FSTL5 (follistatin like 5) genes. The ATP12A gene encodes the H+/K+ ATPase Type 2 protein, a membrane protein involved in transmembrane cation transport, which is present in sperm and acts in the acrosome reaction at fertilization [50]. On the other hand, the SHISA9 gene is associated with pre-weaning growth, while the FSTL5 gene appears to be associated with muscle hypertrophy in cattle, inducing follistin to increase insulin action at the skeletal muscle level [51,52,53,54]. Finally, the BRINP3 (BMP/retinoic acid inducible neural specific 3) gene was also identified, for which its association with meat quality and fertility in heifers is reported [55,56].
Regarding the genes identified, there is an overlap of two SNPs with the SHISA9 and EGFR genes, which affect the animals’ productive capacity and cell regulation, respectively. In addition, one SNP overlaps with the DCHS2, MAP3K1, CMTM7, PCDH15, SSFA2, and ATG13 genes, most of which act in cell regulation and protective cell response. All other genes described are near the SNPs identified.
In the case of the Mertolenga breed, it was also possible to identify genes with different functions. Thus, the UOX (Bos taurus urate oxidase) gene was identified, which encodes the urate oxidase enzyme, which has the function of degrading uric acid, a hematological parameter that is increased in animals infected with T. annulata [57,58]. In addition, the TMC2 (transmembrane channel like 2) gene, which encodes proteins responsible for the formation of mechanosensitive ion channels at the tips of sensory cells in the inner ear, has been identified in mammals [59]. In humans, it is reported to be associated with hearing loss and epidermodysplasia verruciformis [60,61]. Cumulatively, the ZBTB44 (zinc finger and BTB domain containing 44) gene has been identified that appears to be associated with the macrophage-dependent immune response in Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis infection in cattle [62].
Regarding genes associated with production, it was possible to identify the EED (embryonic ectoderm development) gene, whose association with the milk production capacity of cattle is already been reported [63]. In addition, the LOC107131273 gene (multidrug resistance-associated protein 4-like) was identified, for which there is an indication of differential expression in cows pregnant with large fetus, which lead to the development of dystocia, with significant impacts on production [64]. Furthermore, the MTNR1B (melatonin receptor 1B) gene has been identified, which is expressed in mammalian oocytes, and the TRNAC-GCA (tRNA-Cys) gene appears to be associated with sperm quality [65]. In addition to these, the DRD1 (dopamine receptor D1) gene, which encodes the dopamine D1 receptor protein, has been identified. These receptors are prime candidates in the regulation of energy for the maintenance of homeostasis and are implicated in the regulation of feeding behavior in cattle [66]. Finally, the MEF2C (myocyte enhancer factor 2C) gene encoding a myocyte enhancer protein was identified and is important for skeletal, cardiac, and smooth muscle development [67,68].
For the Mertolenga breed, two SNPs were found to overlap with the MEF2C gene and one SNP with the LOC170131273, UOX, and ZBTB44 genes. In addition, the UOX gene is also found to overlap with a QTL (associated with average daily gain). This gene is a strong candidate for resistance to Tropical Theileriosis due to the apparent link with the pathogenesis of the disease, warranting further investigation. In addition, the fact that it is related to a QTL associated with average daily gain could also be a good indicator, since one of the losses associated with infection by T. annulata is reduced productivity [1]. All other genes recorded are near the significant SNPs identified.
In beef cattle, it is known that it is of utmost importance to increase the ability to resist diseases, which is strongly associated with their immune performance. However, the productive traits of these animals cannot be disregarded, meaning that genes associated with the production of more muscle, better quality meat, or even milk in the case of suckler females are of utmost importance.
To the best of the authors’ knowledge, there has been no other published work analyzing GWAS data from the autochthonous Portuguese Alentejana and Mertolenga breeds. As such, this is a study that contributes to deepening genomic knowledge of Portuguese genetic resources. On the other hand, the authors are also unaware of any similar work aimed at associating resistance/tolerance to Tropical Theileriosis using GWAS. Despite this, it was found that some functions of genes associated with resistance to other parasitic diseases, such as Amoebiasis, Trypanosomosis, Toxoplasmosis, and Leishmaniasis, are also common to candidate genes for resistance to Theileriosis, identified in this study. Thus, we highlighted the action on the cell membrane (CMTM7, TMC2, and ATP12A genes), ATP binding (ATP12A gene) and immune response (MAP3K1, CMTM7, SSFA2, ATG13, and ZBTB44 genes) [69]. This work then made it possible to identify some SNPs suggestive of an association with resistance/tolerance to Tropical Theileriosis and the genes and QTLs that overlap or are in the vicinity. In the future, it would be important to replicate the results presented here on a larger sample of animals, focusing on the significant SNPs.

5. Conclusions

In this work, 24 candidate SNPs for resistance to T. annulata infection were identified in the Portuguese Alentejana autochthonous breed and 20 candidate SNPs in the Portuguese Mertolenga autochthonous breed. For both breeds, the protective allele of the identified SNPs appears in a higher percentage in the animals under study. Also, 7 QTLs were found in the Mertolenga breed, of which one overlaps with the candidate gene UOX. This gene appears to be associated with the pathogenesis of Tropical Theileriosis. In the case of the Alentejana breed, the MAP3K1, CMTM7, SSFA2, and ATG13 genes will be good candidate genes for resistance to Tropical Theileriosis, due to their importance in regulating the immune response or their already described impact on resistance to other diseases. Thus, due to the importance that these genes seem to have in Tropical Theileriosis, further studies will be required, focusing on the SNPs identified in this work. On the other hand, the data found in this study could be used to define markers to be applied in breeding programs using marker-assisted selection, for both breeds under study.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D. V., I. C., and J. G.; methodology, I. C., D. V., and O. S.; software, O. S., I. C., and D. V.; validation, O. S., I. C., D. V., J. G., and N. C.; formal analysis, O. S., I. C., and D. V.; investigation, D. V. and I. C.; resources, J. P. and P. E.; data curation, O. S., I. C., D. V., J. G., and N. C.; writing—original draft preparation, D. V.; writing—review and editing, I. C., O. S., A. C. C., J. G., D. V., N. C., J. P., and P. E.; supervision, I. C.; project administration, J. G., and I. C.; funding acquisition, J. G. and I. C.. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The study was funded by LEAP-Agri (A Long-term EU-Africa Research and Innovation Partnership on Food and Innovation on Food and Nutrition Security and Sustainable Agriculture), project no.: 220-MeTVAC (Ecosmart Alternative Control Strategies against Theileria annulata and its Tick Vectors) and Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, Portugal with the reference LEAPAgri/0005/2017.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Decla-ration of Helsinki and approved by the Ethics Committee of the University of Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro (Doc8-CE-UTAD-2023 of 17 February 2023).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Gharbi, M.; Aziz, M.D.; Khawla, E.; Al-Hosary, A.A.T.; Ayadi, O.; Salih Diaeldin, A.; et al. Current status of tropical theileriosis in Northern Africa: A review of recent epidemiological investigations and implications for control. Transbound Emerg Dis 2020, 67, 8–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Pandey, V.; Nigam, R.; Bachan, R.; Sudan, V.; Jaiswal, A.K.; Shankar, D.; et al. Oxidative and haemato-biochemical alterations in theileriosis affected cattle from semi-arid endemic areas of India. Indian J Anim Sci 2017, 87, 846–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Rashid, M.; Akbar, H.; Rashid, I.; Saeed, K.; Ahmad, L.; Ahmad, A.S.; et al. Economic Significance of Tropical Theileriosis on a Holstein Friesian Dairy Farm in Pakistan. J Parasitol 2018, 104, 310–2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Shyma, K.P.; Gupta, J.P.; Singh, V. Breeding strategies for tick resistance in tropical cattle: a sustainable approach for tick control. J Parasit Dis 2015, 39, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Jenkins, C. Bovine theileriosis in Australia: a decade of disease. Microbiol Aust 2017, 15–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kasaija, P.D.; Estrada-Peña, A.; Contreras, M.; Kirunda, H.; Fuente J de, la. Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases Cattle ticks and tick-borne diseases: a review of Uganda’s situation. Ticks Tick Borne Dis 2021, 12. [Google Scholar]
  7. Morrison, W.I. The aetiology, pathogenesis and control of theileriosis in domestic animals Diseases caused by Theileria species. Rev Sci técnica 2015, 34, 599–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Valente, D.; Gomes, J.; Coelho, A.C.; Carolino, I. Genetic Resistance of Bovines to Theileriosis. Animals 2022, 12, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Dzemo, W.D.; Thekisoe, O.; Vudriko, P. Development of acaricide resistance in tick populations of cattle: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Heliyon 2022, 8, e08718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Bahbahani, H.; Hanotte, O. Genetic resistance: tolerance to vector-borne diseases and the prospects and challenges of genomics. Rev Sci Tech - Off Int des épizooties 2015, 34, 185–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Glass, E.J.; Jensen, K. Resistance and susceptibility to a protozoan parasite of cattle — Gene expression differences in macrophages from different breeds of cattle. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 2007, 120, 20–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Kumar, A.; Gaur, G.K.; Gandham, R.K.; Panigrahi, M.; Ghosh, S.; Saravanan, B.C.; et al. Global gene expression profile of peripheral blood mononuclear cells challenged with Theileria annulata in crossbred and indigenous cattle. Infect Genet Evol 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Nazifi, S.; Razavi, S.M.; Reiszadeh, M.; Esmailnezhad, Z.; Ansari-Lari, M.; Hasanshahi, F. Evaluation of the resistance of indigenous Iranian cattle to Theileria annulata compared with Holstein cattle by measurement of acute phase proteins. Comp Clin Path 2010, 19, 155–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Glass, E.J.; Preston, P.M.; Springbett, A.; Craigmile, S.; Kirvar, E.; Wilkie, G.; et al. Bos taurus and Bos indicus (Sahiwal) calves respond differently to infection with Theileria annulata and produce markedly different levels of acute phase proteins. Int J Parasitol 2005, 35, 337–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Tabor, A.E.; Santos, I.K.F.D.M.; Boulanger, N. Editorial: Ticks and Host Immunity – New Strategies for Controlling Ticks and Tick-Borne Pathogens. Front Immunol 2021, 12, 10–2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Otto, P.I.; Guimarães, S.E.F.; Verardo, L.L.; Azevedo, A.L.S.; Vandenplas, J.; Soares, A.C.C.; et al. Genome-wide association studies for tick resistance in Bos taurus × Bos indicus crossbred cattle: A deeper look into this intricate mechanism. J Dairy Sci 2018, 101, 11020–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Riggio, V.; Madder, M.; Labuschagne, M.; Callaby, R.; Zhao, R.; Djikeng, A.; et al. Meta-analysis of heritability estimates and genome-wide association for tick-borne haemoparasites in African cattle. Front Genet 2023, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Mapholi, N.O.; Maiwashe, A.; Matika, O.; Riggio, V.; Bishop, S.C.; Macneil, M.D.; et al. Genome-wide association study of tick resistance in South African Nguni cattle. Ticks Tick Borne Dis 2016, 7, 487–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Jiang, J.; Ma, L.; Prakapenka, D.; Vanraden, P.M.; Cole, J.B.; Da, Y. A Large-Scale Genome-Wide Association Study in U. S. Holstein Cattle. Front Genet 2019, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Johnsson, M. Genomics in animal breeding from the perspectives of matrices and molecules. Hereditas 2023, 160, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Valente, D.; Dutra, A.P.; Carolino, N.; Gomes, J.; Coelho, A.C.; Espadinha, P.; et al. Prevalence and Risk Factors Associated with Theileria annulata Infection in Two Bovine Portuguese Autochthonous Breeds. Pathogens 2023, 12, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. República D da. Portaria n.o 54-C/2023. Portugal; 2023 p. 332-(75)-332-(146).
  23. Rodrigues, F.T. Estrutura demográfica e genética da raça bovina Alentejana. Escola Superior Agrária de Santarém; 2021.
  24. Carolino, N.; Vitorino, A.; Pais, J.; Henriques, N.; Silveira, M.; Vicente, A. Genetic Diversity in the Portuguese Mertolenga Cattle Breed Assessed by Pedigree Analysis. Animals 2020, 10, 1–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Santos, M.; Soares, R.; Costa, P.; Amaro, A.; Inácio, J.; Gomes, J. Revisiting the Tams1-encoding gene as a species-specific target for the molecular detection of Theileria annulata in bovine blood samples. Ticks Tick Borne Dis 2013, 4, 72–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Purcell, S.; Neale, B.; Todd-brown, K.; Thomas, L.; Ferreira, M.A.R.; Bender, D.; et al. PLINK: A Tool Set for Whole-Genome Association and Population-Based Linkage Analyses. Am J Hum Genet 2007, 81, 559–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Elsik, C.; Unni, D.; Diesh, C.; Tayal, A.; Emery, M.; Nguyen, H.; et al. Bovine Genome Database: new tools for gleaning function from the Bos taurus genome [Internet]. Nucleic Acids Res; 2016. Available from: http://bovinemine-v16.rnet.missouri.edu:8080/bovinemine/begin.do.
  28. National Center for Biotechnology Information. National Library of Medicine [Internet]. 2023. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/.
  29. Cao, M.; Shi, L.; Peng, P.; Han, B.; Liu, L.; Lv, X.; et al. Determination of genetic effects and functional SNPs of bovine HTR1B gene on milk fatty acid traits. BMC Genomics 2021, 22, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Kurz, J.P.; Yang, Z.; Weiss, R.B.; Wilson, D.J.; Rood, K.A.; Liu, G.E.; et al. A genome-wide association study for mastitis resistance in phenotypically well-characterized Holstein dairy cattle using a selective genotyping approach. Immunogenetics 2018. [CrossRef]
  31. Sahana, G.; Guldbrandtsen, B.; Lund, M.S. Genome-wide association study for calving traits in Danish and Swedish Holstein cattle. J Dairy Sci 2011, 94, 479–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Peters, S.O.; Kizilkaya, K.; Garrick, D.J.; Fernando, R.L.; Reecy, J.M.; Weber, R.L.; et al. Bayesian genome-wide association analysis of growth and yearling ultrasound measures of carcass traits in Brangus heifers. J Anim Sci 2012, 90, 3398–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Mateescu, R.G.; Garrick, D.J.; Reecy, J.M. Network Analysis Reveals Putative Genes Affecting Meat Quality in Angus Cattle. Front Genet 2017, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Akanno, E.C.; Chen, L.; Ismail, M.K.A.; Crowley, J.J.; Wang, Z.; Li, C.; et al. Genome-wide association scan for heterotic quantitative trait loci in multi-breed and crossbred beef cattle. Genet Sel Evol 2018, 50, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Buitenhuis, B.; Poulsen, N.A.; Gebreyesus, G.; Larsen, L.B. Estimation of genetic parameters and detection of chromosomal regions affecting the major milk proteins and their post translational modifications in Danish Holstein and Danish Jersey cattle. BMC Genet 2016, 17, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Mrode, R.; Ojango, J.M.K.; Okeyo, A.M.; Mwacharo, J.M. Genomic Selection and Use of Molecular Tools in Breeding Programs for Indigenous and Crossbred Cattle in Developing Countries: Current Status and Future Prospects. Front Genet 2019, 9, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Herbst, M.D.R.S. Review of epidermal growth factor receptor biology. Int J Radiat Oncol - Biol - Phys 2004, 59, 21–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Kamouchi, M.; Philipp, S.; Flockerzi, V.; Wissenbach, U.; Mamin, A.; Raeymaekers, L.; et al. Properties of heterologously expressed hTRP3 channels in bovine pulmonary artery endothelial cells. J Physiol 1999, 518, 345–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Simon, M.A.; Xu, A.; Ishikawa, H.O.; Irvine, K.D. Report Modulation of Fat:Dachsous Binding by the Cadherin Domain Kinase Four-Jointed. Curr Biol 2010, 20, 811–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Noyes, H.; Brass, A.; Obara, I.; Anderson, S.; Archibald, A.L.; Bradley, D.G.; et al. Genetic and expression analysis of cattle identifies candidate genes in pathways responding to Trypanosoma congolense infection. PNAS 2011, 108, 9304–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Soares-silva, M.; Diniz, F.F.; Gomes, G.N.; Bahia, D. The Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase (MAPK) Pathway: Role in Immune Evasion by Trypanosomatids. Front Microbiol 2016, 7, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Lebedev, M.; Mceligot, H.A.; Mutua, V.N.; Walsh, P.; Chaigneau, F.R.C.; Gershwin, L.J. Analysis of lung transcriptome in calves infected with Bovine Respiratory Syncytial Virus and treated with antiviral and/or cyclooxygenase inhibitor. PLoS One 2021, 16, 1–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Tümer, K.Ç.; Kızıl, M. Circulatory cytokines during the piroplasm stage of natural Theileria annulata infection in cattle. Parasite Immunol 2023, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Szyda, J.; Mielczarek, M.; Fr, M.; Minozzi, G.; Williams, J.L.; Wojdak-Maksymiec, K. The genetic background of clinical mastitis in Holstein- Friesian cattle. Animal 2019, 13, 2156–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Yang, N.; Hu, N.; Zhang, J.; Yi, J.; Wang, Z.; Wang, Y.; et al. bta-miR-2904 inhibits bovine viral diarrhea virus replication by targeting viral-infection-induced autophagy via ATG13. Arch Virol 2023, 168, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Vassilev, V.B.; Donis, R.O. Bovine viral diarrhea virus-induced apoptosis correlates with increased intracellular viral RNA accumulation. Virus Res 2000, 69, 95–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Chen, Q.; Qu, K.; Ma, Z.; Zhan, J.; Zhang, F.; Shen, J.; et al. Genome-Wide Association Study Identifies Genomic Loci Associated With Neurotransmitter Concentration in Cattle. Front Genet 2020, 11, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Frank, M.; Kemler, R. Protocadherins. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2022, 14, 557–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. NCBI. OR1S8 olfactory receptor family 1 subfamily S member 8 [Bos taurus (cattle)] [Internet]. National Library of Medicine. 2021 [cited 2023 Jul 30]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/?term=107133203.
  50. Favia, M.; Gerbino, A.; Notario, E.; Tragni, V.; Sgobba, M.N.; Elena, M.; et al. The Non-Gastric H+/K+ ATPase (ATP12A) Is Expressed in Mammalian Spermatozoa. Int J Mol Sci 2022, 23, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Duan, X.; An, B.; Du, L.; Chang, T.; Liang, M.; Yang, B.; et al. Genome-Wide Association Analysis of Growth Curve Parameters in Chinese Simmental Beef Cattle. Animals 2021, 11, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Han, X.; Møller, V.L.L.; Groote, E.D.; Bojsen-møller, K.N.; Davey, J.; Henríquez-olguin, C.; et al. Mechanisms involved in follistatin-induced hypertrophy and increased insulin action in skeletal muscle. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 2019, 10, 1241–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Novianti, I. Molecular genetics of cattle muscularity. University of Adelaide; 2010.
  54. Wang, H.; Zhang, L.; Cao, J.; Wu, M.; Ma, X.; Liu, Z. Genome-Wide Specific Selection in Three Domestic Sheep Breeds. PLoS One 2015, 10, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Lee, S.; Lee, D.; Lee, M.; Ryoo, S.; Seo, S.; Choi, I. Analysis of single nucleotide polymorphisms related to heifer fertility in Hanwoo (Korean cattle). Anim Biotechnol 2020, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Xia, J.; Qi, X.; Wu, Y.; Zhu, B.; Xu, L.; Zhang, L.; et al. Genome-wide association study identifies loci and candidate genes for meat quality traits in Simmental beef cattle. Mamm Genome 2016. [CrossRef]
  57. Thyrion, L.; Portelli, J.; Raedt, R.; Glorieux, G.; Larsen, L.E.; Sprengers, M.; et al. Disruption, but not overexpression of urate oxidase alters susceptibility to pentylenetetrazole- and pilocarpine-induced seizures in mice. Epilepsia 2016, 57, 146–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Tuli, A.; Singla, L.D.; Sharma, A.; Mandeep, S.B.; Filia, G.; Kaur, P. Molecular epidemiology, risk factors and hematochemical alterations induced by Theileria annulata in bovines of Punjab (India). Acta Parasitol 2015, 60, 378–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Kurima, K.; Ebrahim, S.; Pan, B.; Holt, J.R.; Griffith, A.J.; Kachar, B. TMC1 and TMC2 Localize at the Site of Mechanotransduction in Mammalian Inner Ear Hair Article TMC1 and TMC2 Localize at the Site of Mechanotransduction in Mammalian Inner Ear Hair Cell Stereocilia. CellReports 2015, 12, 1606–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Kurima, K.; Yang, Y.; Sorber, K.; Griffith, A.J. Characterization of the transmembrane channel-like (TMC) gene family: functional clues from hearing loss and epidermodysplasia verruciformis. Genomics 2003, 82, 300–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Reyna, S.; Trujano-chavez, M.Z.; Gallegos-s, J.; Becerril-p, M.; Cadena-villegas, S.; Cortez-romero, C. Detection of Candidate Genes Associated with Fecundity through Genome-Wide Selection Signatures of Katahdin Ewes. Animals 2023, 13, 1–12. [Google Scholar]
  62. Malvisi, M.; Palazzo, F.; Morandi, N.; Lazzari, B.; Williams, L.J.; Pagnacco, G.; et al. Responses of Bovine Innate Immunity to Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis Infection Revealed by Changes in Gene Expression and Levels of MicroRNA. PLoS One 2016, 11, 1–23. [Google Scholar]
  63. Sanchez, M.P.; Ramayo-Caldas, Y.; Wolf, V.; Laithier, C.; Jabri, M.E.; Michenet, A.; et al. Sequence-based GWAS, network and pathway analyses reveal genes co - associated with milk cheese - making properties and milk composition in Montbéliarde cows. Genet Sel Evol 2019, 51, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Rivera, R.M.; Goldkamp, A.K.; Patel, B.N.; Hagen, D.E.; Joel, E.; Moreno, S.; et al. Identification of large offspring syndrome during pregnancy through ultrasonography and maternal blood transcriptome analyses. Sci Rep 2022, 12, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. El-Raey, M.; Geshi, M.; Somfai, T.; Kaneda, M.; Hirako, M.; Abdel-Ghaffar, A.E.; et al. Evidence of Melatonin Synthesis in the Cumulus Oocyte Complexes and its Role in Enhancing Oocyte Maturation In Vitro in Cattle. Mol Reprod Dev 2011, 78, 250–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Haegeman, A.; Williams, J.L.; Law, A.; Zeveren, A.; Van Peelman, L.J. Characterization and mapping of bovine dopamine receptors 1 and 5. Anim Genet 2003, 34, 290–3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Juszczuk-Kubiak, E.; Flisikowski, K.; Wicinska, K. Nucleotide sequence and variations of the bovine myocyte enhancer factor 2C (MEF2C) gene promoter in Bos taurus cattle. Mol Biol Rep 2011, 38, 1269–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Juszczuk-kubiak, E.; Wicinska, K.; Starzynski, R.R. Postnatal expression patterns and polymorphism analysis of the bovine myocyte enhancer factor 2C (Mef2C) gene. Meat Sci 2014, 98, 753–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Ahlawat, S.; Choudhary, V.; Kaur, R.; Arora, R.; Sharma, R.; Chhabra, P.; et al. Unraveling the genetic mechanisms governing the host response to bovine anaplasmosis. Gene 2023, 877, 147532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. The genome-wide significance threshold is indicated by the dashed line (p < 10-4). The position of the bovine chromosome is shown on the x-axis. The strength of association for a GWAS single locus mixed model is shown on the y-axis. a) Data from Alentejana breed animals. b) Data from Mertolenga breed animals.
Figure 1. The genome-wide significance threshold is indicated by the dashed line (p < 10-4). The position of the bovine chromosome is shown on the x-axis. The strength of association for a GWAS single locus mixed model is shown on the y-axis. a) Data from Alentejana breed animals. b) Data from Mertolenga breed animals.
Preprints 93136 g001
Table 1. Characteristics of Alentejana and Mertolenga animals under study.
Table 1. Characteristics of Alentejana and Mertolenga animals under study.
Parameter Alentejana Mertolenga
T. annulata
infection
Positive 30 (31.25%) 48 (50.00%)
Negative 66 (68.75%) 48 (50.00%)
Age Youngest animal 8 months 1 month
Oldest animal 14 years and 2 months 8 years and 5 months
Sex Male 5 (5.20%) 3 (3.10%)
Female 91 (94.8%) 93 (96.90%)
Number of farms 14 13
Table 2. SNPs suggestive of genome-wide significance, with p values and the allele associated with resistance to Tropical Theileriosis (Chr – Chromosome; A1- Minor allele; BETA - Regression coefficient).
Table 2. SNPs suggestive of genome-wide significance, with p values and the allele associated with resistance to Tropical Theileriosis (Chr – Chromosome; A1- Minor allele; BETA - Regression coefficient).
Alentejana Breed
Marker Chr Position/
Variant
p-value A1 BETA Protective allele Reference allele/ alternative allele
rs29016369 25 11866965
Intergenic
6,80x10-6 T 2,045 C C/T
rs382748014 22 1175689
Intergenic
1,28x10-5 A 2,190 G A/G
rs136686350 22 1079338
Intron
2,19x10-5 T 2,162 C C/T
rs42824138 17 3176994
Intron
2,50x10-5 A 1,767 G A/G
rs42349624 22 1012010
Intron
2,97x10-5 C 2,017 T T/C
rs110733319 22 1130073
Intergenic
2,97x10-5 T 2,017 G G/T
rs41580257 20 22411430
Intron
3,48x10-5 A 2,100 G G/A
rs109220983 22 8175191
Intergenic
3,77x10-5 C 2,152 T T/C
rs110456301 20 22270511
Intergenic
3,85x10-5 T 1,842 G T/G
rs136677596 20 22278044
Upstream gene variant
3,85x10-5 T 1,842 C T/C
rs134209239 25 11945164
Intergenic
4,08x10-5 C 1,751 T C/T
rs110136753 12 36966751
Intergenic
4,94x10-5 T 1,621 C T/C
rs137404731 6 49298093
Intergenic
5,33x10-5 A -2,453 A G/A
rs135649048 17 35855903
Intergenic
5,89x10-5 T 1,481 C C/T
rs110248505 17 3089327
Intron
6,12x10-5 A 1,688 G A/G
rs378877063 22 6853730
Intron
6,12x10-5 T 1,937 C C/T
rs133854848 17 35658672
Intergenic
6,29x10-5 A 1,615 G G/A
rs42082138 26 4547983
Intergenic
7,09x10-5 A -1,996 A G/A
rs42238085 2 14716248
Intron
7,11x10-5 A -1,701 A G/A
rs134193812 16 15787680
Intergenic
7,24x10-5 C -1,530 C C/T
rs137244944 4 70697022
Upstream gene variant
7,53x10-5 G -1,827 G G/A
rs41657708 9 103006480
Intergenic
7,74x10-5 T -1,743 T C/T
rs136575474 15 81387903
Intron
8,99x10-5 G 1,340 T G/T
rs41782203 15 76586569
Intron
9,60x10-5 A 1,656 G G/A
Mertolenga Breed
rs41625107 7 89404622
Intergenic
9,40x10-6 G 1,584 A A/G
rs385061716 21 62178639
Intergenic
1,82x10-5 T 1,776 C C/T
rs137077511 29 9372082
Intergenic
2,88x10-5 T 1,638 G T/G
rs210844007 3 59423141
Intron
3,46x10-5 G 1,580 A A/G
rs136003479 4 68835630
Downstream gene variant
4,55x10-5 A 1,330 G G/A
rs42966583 12 71327190
Intron
5,51x10-5 A -1,378 A A/C
rs109210201 29 1806321
Intergenic
5,53x10-5 C 1,784 A C/A
rs110183014 11 89708117
Intergenic
6,69x10-5 A -1,494 A G/A
rs43338206 3 59696522
Intron
7,01x10-5 T 1,532 C T/C
rs110582951 13 52653719
Intergenic
7,05x10-5 G 1,397 A G/A
rs41588323 8 7368884
Intergenic
7,46x10-5 C 2,140 T T/C
rs42492357 29 1982095
Intergenic
7,59x10-5 G 1,490 A A/G
rs41651830 29 36432759
Upstream gene variant
7,59x10-5 C 1,490 T T/C
rs109072096 4 68841016
Upstream and Downstream gene variant
7,84x10-5 A 1,246 G G/A
rs109619291 7 92837313
Intergenic
7,91x10-5 T 1,301 C C/T
AX-212327028* 4 69412929
*
8,15x10-5 C 2,039 A A/C
rs43338222 3 59690463
Missense variant and intron
9,01x10-5 T 1,508 C C/T
rs110062605 10 6197570
Intergenic
9,14x10-5 A 1,340 C C/A
rs133541497 7 88255064
Intron
9,41x10-5 A -1,278 A C/A
rs137232658 7 88256048
Intron
9,41x10-5 G -1,278 G A/G
* No rsID SNP and variant could be found, thus the Affymetrix Axiom Bovine ID was presented.
Table 3. Quantitative Trait Locus already described and which were found based on the SNPs with genomic significance considered for the Mertolenga breed (Chr – Chromosome).
Table 3. Quantitative Trait Locus already described and which were found based on the SNPs with genomic significance considered for the Mertolenga breed (Chr – Chromosome).
Marker Chr QTL ID QTL Trait References
rs43338206 3 22779 Average daily gain B. taurus [32]
rs41625107 7 151659 Muscle carnosine content [33]
rs41625107 7 151673 Muscle creatine content [33]
rs41625107 7 164401 Body weight (birth) [34]
rs41625107 7 164580 Longissimus muscle area [34]
rs41588323 8 151760 Muscle creatinine content [33]
rs137077511 29 116645 Milk glycosylated kappa-casein percentage [35]
Table 4. Identification of genes using SNPs with significance for the Alentejana breed (Bos taurus) (Chr - Chromosome).
Table 4. Identification of genes using SNPs with significance for the Alentejana breed (Bos taurus) (Chr - Chromosome).
Marker p-value Chr Position Gene Gene Location
rs29016369 6,80x10-6 25 11866965 SHISA9 - shisa family member 9 11633241-11647753
11633245-12158399
rs382748014 1,28x10-5 22 1175689 EGFR - epidermal growth factor receptor 905960-1121554
RF00003 1258027-1258168
rs136686350 2,19x10-5 22 1079338 EGFR - epidermal growth factor receptor 905960-1121554
rs42824138 2,50x10-5 17 3176994 ENSBTAG00000024545 3009649-3332773
DCHS2 - dachsous cadherin-related 2 3137604-3333575
rs42349624 2,97x10-5 22 1012010 EGFR - epidermal growth factor receptor 899974-1121540
905960-1121554
rs110733319 2,97x10-5 22 1130073 EGFR - epidermal growth factor receptor 899974-1121540
905960-1121554
RF00003 1258027-1258168
rs41580257 3,48x10-5 20 22411430 MAP3K1 - mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase kinase 1 22340163-22417428
rs109220983 3,77x10-5 22 8175191 ENSBTAG00000051119 8163685-8167126
RF00026 8222734-8222838
rs110456301 3,85x10-5 20 22270511 LOC112443032 - uncharacterized 22159612-22183599
MIER3 - MIER family member 3 22279228-22305654
rs136677596 3,85x10-5 20 22278044 LOC112443032 - uncharacterized 22159612-22183599
MIER3 - MIER family member 3 22279228-22305654
rs134209239 4,08x10-5 25 11945164 SHISA9 - shisa family member 9 11633245-12158399
rs110136753 4,94x10-5 12 36966751 ATP12A - ATPase H /K transporting non-gastric alpha2 subunit 36642635-36664187
ENSBTAG00000049928 37397698-37398144
rs137404731 5,33x10-5 6 49298093 RF00156 49020641-49020774
RF00019 49412387-49412498
rs135649048 5,89x10-5 17 35855903 TRPC3 - transient receptor potential cation channel subfamily C member 3 35728366-35800211
FSTL5 - follistatin like 5 36260758-37189201
rs110248505 6,12x10-5 17 3089327 LOC107133268 - protocadherin-16-like 3009266-3011829
ENSBTAG00000024545 3009649-3332773
rs378877063 6,12x10-5 22 6853730 CMTM7 - Bos taurus CKLF like MARVEL transmembrane domain containing 7 6821672-6869727
6821790-6869725
rs133854848 6,29x10-5 17 35658672 LOC782754 - mpv17-like protein 2 35638835-35639137
TRPC3 - transient receptor potential cation channel subfamily C member 3 35728366-35800211
rs42082138 7,09x10-5 26 4547983 PCDH15 - protocadherin related 15 4509270-5569299
rs42238085 7,11x10-5 2 14716248 SSFA2 - sperm specific antigen 2 14654230-14750696
ITPRID2 - Bos taurus ITPR interacting domain containing 2 14654230-14751034
rs134193812 7,24x10-5 16 15787680 BRINP3 - BMP/retinoic acid inducible neural specific 3 15141936-15631140
RF00001 16102665-16102785
rs137244944 7,53x10-5 4 70697022 C4H7orf31 - chromosome 4 C7orf31 homolog 70687353-70727845
rs41657708 7,74x10-5 9 103006480 LOC101907681 -uncharacterized 102848965-102870347
LOC112448098 -uncharacterized 103129637-103132019
rs136575474 8,99x10-5 15 81387903 LOC107133203 - olfactory receptor 1S1-like 81383730-81385093
LOC104974344 - olfactory receptor 10Q1 81397109-81421347
rs41782203 9,60x10-5 15 76586569 ATG13 - Bos taurus autophagy related 13 76578054-76620037
76578279-76620035
Table 5. Identification of genes using SNPs with significance for the Mertolenga breed (Bos taurus) (Chr - Chromosome).
Table 5. Identification of genes using SNPs with significance for the Mertolenga breed (Bos taurus) (Chr - Chromosome).
Marker p-value Chr Position Gene Gene Location
rs41625107 9,40 x10-6 7 89404622 MIR3660 - microRNA 3660 89558103-89558182
ENSBTAG00000048981 88840369-88848347
rs385061716 1,82x10-5 21 62178639 RF00003 - RNA, U1 small nuclear 85, pseudogene 62091713-62091865
LOC112443166 - uncharacterized 62865898-62974123
rs137077511 2,88x10-5 29 9372082 EED - embryonic ectoderm development 9265439-9296624
LOC112444890 -uncharacterized 9426391-9430563
rs210844007 3,46x10-5 3 59423141 SSX2IP - Bos taurus SSX family member 2 interacting protein 59398296-59456577
rs136003479 4,55x10-5 4 68835630 RF02043 68836226-68836391
rs42966583 5,51x10-5 12 71327190 ENSBTAG00000026070 71263913-71411435
LOC107131273 - multidrug resistance-associated protein 4-like 71265415-71400436
rs109210201 5,53x10-5 29 1806321 SLC36A4 - solute carrier family 36 member 4 1701573-1743386
MTNR1B - melatonin receptor 1B 1901714-1916511
rs110183014 6,69x10-5 11 89708117 RF00017 - RNA, 7SL, cytoplasmic 825, pseudogene 89685923-89686207
ENSBTAG00000052434 89823864-89861691
rs43338206 7,01x10-5 3 59696522 UOX - Bos taurus urate oxidase 59636716-59736408
DNASE2B - deoxyribonuclease 2 beta 59681735-59700078
RPF1 - ribosome production factor 1 homolog 59600697-59617167
rs110582951 7,05x10-5 13 52653719 TMC2 - transmembrane channel like 2 52539174-52640959
SNRPB - small nuclear ribonucleoprotein polypeptides B and B1 52666459-52675562
rs41588323 7,46x10-5 8 7368884 ENSBTAG00000039873 7325501-7331864
TRNAC-GCA - tRNA-Cys 7430900-7430971
rs42492357 7,59x10-5 29 1982095 MTNR1B - melatonin receptor 1B 1901714-1916511
FAT3 - FAT atypical cadherin 3 1991657-2638923
rs41651830 7,59x10-5 29 36432759 ZBTB44 - zinc finger and BTB domain containing 44 36401292-36460165
36408247-36429241
rs109072096 7,84x10-5 4 68841016 RF02041 68840319-68840692
RF02040 68842022-68842077
rs109619291 7,91x10-5 7 92837313 ENSBTAG00000054282 92782983-92822683
LOC100848699 -uncharacterized 92887690-92904398
AX-212327028* 8,15x10-5 4 69412929 RF00100 69383582-69383863
LOC112446335 -uncharacterized 69487699-69491861
rs43338222 9,01x10-5 3 59690463 DNASE2B - deoxyribonuclease 2 beta 59681735-59700078
59681727-59699694
rs110062605 9,14x10-5 10 6197570 DRD1 - Bos taurus dopamine receptor D1 5715882-5718113
LOC112448549 -uncharacterized 6357822-6363522
rs133541497 9,41x10-5 7 88255064 MEF2C - myocyte enhancer factor 2C 88250023-88407702
rs137232658 9,41x10-5 7 88256048 MEF2C - myocyte enhancer factor 2C 88250023-88407702
* No rsID SNP could be found, thus the Affymetrix Axiom Bovine ID was presented.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

Privacy Settings

© 2025 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated