Preprint Article Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

The csQCA Analysis on Success or Failure of Adding Elevators to Old Buildings in China under the Multiple Coordination

Version 1 : Received: 8 November 2023 / Approved: 8 November 2023 / Online: 9 November 2023 (07:16:50 CET)

How to cite: Hongxia, L.; Guofu, J. The csQCA Analysis on Success or Failure of Adding Elevators to Old Buildings in China under the Multiple Coordination. Preprints 2023, 2023110551. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202311.0551.v1 Hongxia, L.; Guofu, J. The csQCA Analysis on Success or Failure of Adding Elevators to Old Buildings in China under the Multiple Coordination. Preprints 2023, 2023110551. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202311.0551.v1

Abstract

Based on the multiple coordination framework of “promising government-effective market-ordered society”, this paper takes 68 cases of adding elevators to old buildings as samples, and selects six conditional variables: approval optimization, financial subsidies, financing innovation, technological innovation, capable people leading and neighborhood committee guidance. Using Crisp-Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (csQCA), this paper discusses the combination of conditions that affect the success or failure. It is found that: approval optimization and neighborhood committee guidance are sufficient conditions for the success; successful cases can be divided into three types: “political and social dual-drive type”, “market and social dual-drive type” and “ternary co-drive type”; lack of approval optimization, lack of financing innovation, and the existence of capable people leading are necessary conditions for the failure. The failure cases can be divided into “government and market double failure type” and “market failure type”.

Keywords

Adding elevators to the old building in China; Multiple coordination; Crisp-Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis

Subject

Social Sciences, Urban Studies and Planning

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.