Submitted:
17 October 2023
Posted:
19 October 2023
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Raw materials
2.1.1. Laterite nickel ore
2.1.2. Reductants and additives
2.2. Experimental methods
2.2.1. Sample preparation
2.2.2. Carbothermal reduction and magnetic separation
3. Results and discussion
3.1. The morphology of as-prepared ferronickel concentrates
3.2. Iron and nickel contents of as-prepared ferronickel concentrates after fine grinding and magnetic separation
3.3. Effects of the additive type on the iron and nickel contents of as-prepared ferronickel concentrates
3.4. Thermodynamic equilibrium and melting temperature calculation
4. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Hang, G.; Xue, Z.; Wu, Y. J.; Zhang, B. , Effect of CaF2 on the aggregation and growth of ferronickel particles in the self-reduction of nickel laterite ore. Metall. Res. Technol. 2021, 118, 407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Z.; Li, B.; Feng, Z.; Hui, S.; Yang, Y.; Wang, H. , Extraction of ferronickel concentrate by reduction roasting-magnetic separation from low grade laterite nickel ore under the action of compound additives. Mater. Trans. 2022, 63, 1197–1204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tian, H.; Guo, Z.; Zhan, R.; Pan, J.; Zhu, D.; Yang, C.; Pan, L. , Effective and economical treatment of low-grade nickel laterite by a duplex process of direct reduction-magnetic separation & rotary kiln-electric furnace and its industrial application. Powder Technol. 2021, 394, 120–132. [Google Scholar]
- Yuan, S.; Zhou, W.; Li, Y.; Han, Y. , Efficient enrichment of nickel and iron in laterite nickel ore by deep reduction and magnetic separation. T. Nonferr. Metal. Soc. 2020, 30, 812–822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shi, R.; Li, X.; Cui, Y.; Zhao, J.; Zou, C.; Qiu, G. , Coupled preparation of ferronickel and cementitious material from laterite nickel ores. Materials 2020, 13, 4992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Forster, J.; Pickles, C. A.; Elliott, R. , Microwave carbothermic reduction roasting of a low grade nickeliferous silicate laterite ore. Miner. Eng. 2016, 88, 18–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y.; Nie, C.; Li, B.; Wei, Y. , Migration and aggregation behavior of nickel and iron in low grade laterite ore with new additives. Metals 2021, 11, 2033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, D.; Zhou, X.; Luo, Y.; Pan, J.; Bai, B. , Reduction smelting low ferronickel from pre-concentrated nickel-Iron ore of nickel laterite. High Temp. Mat. Pr-Isr. 2016, 35, 1031–1036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dong, J.; Wei, Y.; Lu, C.; Zhou, S.; Li, B.; Ding, Z.; Wang, C.; Ma, B. , Influence of calcium chloride addition on coal-based reduction roasting of low-nickel garnierite ore. Mater. Trans. 2017, 58, 1161–1168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ma, B.; Yang, W.; Xing, P.; Wang, C.; Chen, Y.; Lv, D. , Pilot-scale plant study on solid-state metalized reduction–magnetic separation for magnesium-rich nickel oxide ores. Int. J. Miner. Process. 2017, 169, 99–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, D.; Pan, L.; Guo, Z.; Pan, J.; Zhang, F. , Utilization of limonitic nickel laterite to produce ferronickel concentrate by the selective reduction-magnetic separation process. Adv. Powder Technol. 2019, 30, 451–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ma, B.; Xing, P.; Yang, W.; Wang, C.; Chen, Y.; Wang, H. , Solid-state metalized reduction of magnesium-rich low-nickel oxide ores using coal as the reductant based on thermodynamic analysis. Metall. Mater. Trans. B 2017, 48, 2037–2046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hang, G.; Xue, Z.; Wang, J.; Wu, Y. , Mechanism of calcium sulphate on the aggregation and growth of ferronickel particles in the self-reduction of saprolitic nickel laterite ore. Metals 2020, 10, 423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qu, G.; Zhou, S.; Wang, H.; Li, B.; Wei, Y. , Production of ferronickel concentrate from low-grade nickel laterite ore by non-melting reduction magnetic separation process. Metals 2019, 9, 1340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ma, B.; Li, X.; Yang, W.; Hu, D.; Xing, P.; Liu, B.; Wang, C. , Nonmolten state metalized reduction of saprolitic laterite ores: Effective extraction and process optimization of nickel and iron. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 256, 120415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cao, W.; Yang, Q. , Properties of a carbonated steel slag-slaked lime mixture. J. Mater. Civil Eng. 2015, 27, 04014115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Farrokhpay, S.; Filippov, L. , Challenges in processing nickel laterite ores by flotation. Int. J. Miner. Process. 2016, 151, 59–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cao, Z.; Ma, B.; Zhou, J.; Chen, Y.; Wang, C. , The study for reduction roasting of laterite residue in the presence of CaF2. Process. Saf. Environ. 2022, 168, 1–9. [Google Scholar]






| Component | Fetotal | Nitotal | FeO | Fe2O3 | CaO | MgO | SiO2 | Al2O3 | P2O5 | S | LOI1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Content | 15.87 | 1.32 | 1.33 | 21.19 | 0.80 | 15.10 | 40.46 | 2.79 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 15.24 |
| Component | CaO | MgO | SiO2 | Al2O3 | C | P2O5 | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anthracite | 1.28 | 0.35 | 6.09 | 2.68 | 76.56 | 0.23 | 0.54 |
| Slaked lime | 67.52 | 4.56 | 0.56 | - | 2.11 | 0.01 | - |
| Sample | Laterite (wt.%) |
Carbon ratio | Anthracite (wt.%) |
Slaked lime (wt.%) |
CaF2 (wt.%) |
Na2SO4 (wt.%) |
H3BO3 (wt.%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C1.2 | 92.21 | 1.2 | 7.79 | - | - | - | - |
| C1.4 | 91.03 | 1.4 | 8.97 | - | - | - | - |
| C1.2-F6 | 87.37 | 1.2 | 7.38 | - | 5.24 | - | - |
| C1.2-F12 | 83.02 | 1.2 | 7.02 | - | 9.96 | - | - |
| C1.4-F6 | 86.32 | 1.4 | 8.50 | - | 5.18 | - | - |
| C1.4-F9 | 84.14 | 1.4 | 8.29 | - | 7.57 | - | - |
| C1.4-F12 | 82.07 | 1.4 | 8.08 | - | 9.85 | - | - |
| C1.2-SL | 50.84 | 1.2 | 4.30 | 44.86 | - | - | - |
| C1.2-F6-SL | 49.34 | 1.2 | 4.17 | 43.53 | 2.96 | - | - |
| C1.4-F6-S1 | 85.58 | 1.4 | 8.43 | - | 5.13 | 0.86 | - |
| C1.4-F12-B1 | 81.40 | 1.4 | 8.02 | - | 9.77 | - | 0.81 |
| C1.4-F12-B2 | 80.74 | 1.4 | 7.95 | - | 9.69 | - | 1.61 |
| Grinding time (s) | 30 | 60 | 90 | 120 | 240 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| D10 | 10 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 |
| D50 | 52 | 52 | 32 | 12 | 6 |
| D90 | 339 | 147 | 114 | 63 | 26 |
| Sample | Fe content (g) |
Reduction ratio of Fe * (%) |
Ni content (g) |
Reduction ratio of Ni * (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| C1.2-F6 | 13.26 | 99.98 | 1.38 | 100 |
| C1.2-F12 | 13.26 | 99.98 | 1.38 | 100 |
| C1.4-F6 | 13.26 | 99.98 | 1.38 | 100 |
| C1.4-F9 | 13.26 | 99.98 | 1.38 | 100 |
| C1.4-F12 | 13.26 | 99.98 | 1.38 | 100 |
| C1.2-F12-S1 | 13.25 | 99.90 | 1.38 | 100 |
| C1.4-F12-B1 | 13.26 | 100 | 1.38 | 100 |
| C1.4-F12-B2 | 13.26 | 99.98 | 1.38 | 100 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).