Submitted:
02 October 2023
Posted:
02 October 2023
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Material and Methods
2.1. Experimental location
2.2. Experimental treatments
2.3. Hydrogels used
2.4. Experimental Units
2.5. Evaluation of the morphogenic and production characteristics of the grasses
2.6. Analysis of the chemical and mineral composition of the grasses
2.7. Statistical analysis
3. Results
3.1. Morphogenesis
3.2. Structure and production characteristics
3.3. Chemical and mineral composition
4. Discussion
4.1. Morphogenesis
4.2. Structure and production characteristics
4.3. Chemical and mineral composition
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Fonseca, D. M.; Martuscello, J.A. Plantas Forrageiras, 2ªEd., UFV.; Minas Gerais, Brasil, 2022; pp. 591.
- Abril, B.; Roncallo, B. Efecto de la inoculación con bacterias del género Bacillus sobre el crecimiento de Megathyrsus maximus Jacq, en condiciones de estrés hídrico. Rev. agron. noroeste arg. 2017, 37, 25–37. [Google Scholar]
- Rodriguez-Soto, A.; Jose, V. Desarrollo de un material compuesto de fibras de henequén utilizando uma matriz termofija development of composite with henequen´s fibres and termofix matrix. Rev. cient. ing. mec. 2014, 17, 264–272. [Google Scholar]
- Barros, A. B.; Moura, A. F. Evaluation Of Antitumor Potential Of Cashew Gum Extracted From Anacardium Occidentale Linn. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 154, 319–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Costa-Coutinho, J.M.; Jardim, M.A. Biogeographic connections of Brazilian savannas: partition of marginal and disjunct diversity and conservation of northern ecotonal tropics in a biodiversity hotspot. Rev. Bras. Geogr. Fís. 2019, 12, 2407–2427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Raij, B.V. Fertilidade do solo e adubação. Ceres, Piracicaba, Brasil, 1991, pp.343.
- Teixeira, P. C.; Donagemma, G. K. Manual de métodos de análises de solos. 3ª ed. Embrapa Informação Tecnológica, Brasília, Brasil, 2017, pp. 573.
- Martha, G.B. JR.; Vilela, D. Cerrado: Uso Eficiente de Corretivos e Fertilizantes em Pastagens. Embrapa Cerrados, Brasília, Brasil, 2007, pp. 224.
- Lemaire, G.; Chapman, D. Tissue fluxes in grazing plant communities. In The ecology and management of grazing systems, Hodgson, J.; Illius, A.W., Eds., Wallingford: CAB International, 1996; pp. 1–33. [Google Scholar]
- Detmann, E., Souza, M. A. Métodos para análise de alimentos. Suprema, Minas Gerais, Brasil, 2012, pp. 350.
- Silva, F. C. Manual de análises químicas de solos, plantas e fertilizantes. 2ªed. Embrapa Informação Tecnológica; Rio de Janeiro, Brasil, 2009, pp. 627.
- Ferreira, D. F. Sisvar: Um sistema de análise estatística de computador. Ciênc. agrotec. 1039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sousa, H. R.; Lima, I. S. Superabsorbent Hydrogels Based to Polyacrylamide/Cashew Tree Gum for the Controlled Release of Water and Plant Nutrients. Molecules 2021, 26, 2680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Guilherme M., R., Aouada F. A. Superabsorbent hydrogels based on polysaccharides for application in agriculture as soil conditioner and nutrient carrier: a review. Eur. Polym. J. 2015, 72, 365–385. [CrossRef]
- Yonezawa, U. G.; Moura, M. R. Estado da arte: um estudo sobre polímeros biodegradáveis na germinação e desenvolvimento de plantas. Cad. Ciênc. Agra. 2017, 9, 69–78. [Google Scholar]
- Bezerra, J. D. V.; Emereciano Neto, J. Características produtivas, morfogênicas e estruturais de cultivares de Brachiaria brizantha cultivadas em dois tipos de solo. Res., Soc. Dev. [CrossRef]
- Cruz, N.T.; Pires, A.J.V. Fatores que afetam as características morfogênicas e estruturais de plantas forrageiras. Res., Soc. Dev. [CrossRef]
- Freitas, F.P.; Fonseca, D.M. Forage yield and nutritive value of Tanzania grass under nitrogen supplies and plant densities. R. Bras. Zootec. 2012, 41, 864–872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Muller, M. D. S.; Fancelli, A. L. López Ovejero, R. F. Productivity of Panicum maximum cv. mombaça under rotational grazing and irrigation. Sci. agric. 2002, 59, 427–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Navroski, M.C.; Araújo, M.M. Influencia do hidrogel no crescimento e no teor de nutrientes das mudas de Eucalyptus dunnii. Floresta. 2015, 45, 315–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Silva, R.D.; Silva Junior, G.S. Nutrição com boro na soja em função da disponibilidade de água no solo. Sci. Agrar. 2017, 18, 155–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fernandes, M.S.; Souza, S.R. Nutrição Mineral de Plantas. 2ªed., Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência do Solo, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil, 2018, pp. 670p.
- Taiz, L.; Zeiger, E.; Fisiologia e desenvolvimento vegetal. 6ª ed., Artmed, Porto Alegre, Brasil, 2017, pp. 888.
- Fageria, N.K. Níveis adequados e tóxicos de zinco na produção de arroz, feijão, milho, soja e trigo em solo de cerrado. Rev. bras. eng. agríc. ambient. 2000, 4, 390–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
| Variables | Hydrogel (H) | |||||
| No | Commercial | Test | Mean | P-value | SEM | |
| LER (mm tiller-1 day-1) | 30.53b | 35.00ab | 42.33a | 35.95 | 0.03 | 2.67 |
| SER (mm tiller-1 day-1) | 0.26a | 0.35a | 0.60a | 0.40 | 0.11 | 0.10 |
| LSR (mm tiller-1 day-1) | 0.95a | 1.01a | 1.36a | 3.36 | 0.36 | 4.22 |
| NLLe (leaves tiller-1) | 8.27a | 8.53a | 9.33a | 8.71 | 0.87 | 1.47 |
| LAR (leaves tiller-1 day-1) | 0.257a | 0.360a | 0.495a | 0.371 | 0.53 | 0.144 |
| PHY (days leaves-1 tiller-1) | 2.86a | 4.55a | 4.97a | 4.13 | 0.51 | 1.32 |
| Hydrogel | Cycles | Mean | SEM | P - Value | |||
| Cycle 1 | Cycle 2 | H | C | H×C | |||
| Plant Height (cm) | |||||||
| No | 64.8 | 64.2 | 64.5 | 1.32 | 0.23 | 0.62 | 0.29 |
| Commercial | 64.6 | 59.0 | 61.8 | ||||
| Test | 62.2 | 63.8 | 63.0 | ||||
| Mean | 63.8 | 62.3 | |||||
| Leaf Green Mass Yield (kg ha-1) | |||||||
| No | 7,000.0 | 4,936.0 | 5,968.0B | 232.17 | <0.01 | <0.01 | 0.84 |
| Commercial | 7,448.0 | 5,296.0 | 6,372.0B | ||||
| Test | 8,664.0 | 6,161.0 | 7,412.0A | ||||
| Mean | 7,704.0a | 5,464.0b | |||||
| Leaf Dry Mass Yield (kg ha-1) | |||||||
| No | 2,617.4Ca | 1,678.8Ab | 2,338.9 | 81.55 | 0.16 | <0.01 | <0.01 |
| Commercial | 3,694.5Ba | 1,966.5Ab | 2,830.5 | ||||
| Test | 4,477.0Aa | 2,060.4Ab | 3,077.9 | ||||
| Mean | 3,596.3 | 1,901.9 | |||||
| Tiller Population Density (TPD, tiller m-²) | |||||||
| No | 177.0 | 188.2 | 182.6b | 9.76 | <0.01 | 0.09 | 0.44 |
| Commercial | 169.6 | 219.4 | 194.5ab | ||||
| Test | 231.0 | 243.4 | 237.3a | ||||
| Mean | 192.6a | 217.0a | |||||
| Variables | Hydrogel (H) | Mean | SEM | P–Value | ||
| No | Commercial | Test | ||||
| DM (g kg) | 310.6a | 307.1a | 308.1a | 308.6 | 1.53 | 0.98 |
| CP (g kg-1 DM) | 69.5a | 73.8a | 72.3a | 71.8 | 0.35 | 0.68 |
| NDF (g kg-1 DM) | 713.6a | 691.5a | 717.9a | 707.6 | 0.83 | 0.11 |
| ADF (g kg-1 DM) | 349.3a | 341.2a | 353.4a | 347.9 | 0.57 | 0.36 |
| MM (g kg-1 DM) | 42.2a | 41.9a | 46.0a | 43.3 | 0.44 | 0.77 |
| Variables | Hydrogel (H) | Mean | SEM | P-Value | ||
| No | Commercial | Test | ||||
| Ca (mg kg-1) | 42.6a | 35.7a | 35.2a | 37.8 | 0.31 | 0.24 |
| Mg (mg kg-1) | 5.0a | 4.5a | 4.1a | 4.5 | 0.07 | 0.72 |
| P (mg kg-1) | 3.5a | 3.8a | 4.7a | 4.0 | 0.05 | 0.35 |
| K (mg kg-1) | 365.2a | 334.0a | 294.0a | 331.0 | 4.07 | 0.49 |
| Cu (mg kg-1) | 1.1a | 1.4a | 17.0a | 8.1 | 0.03 | 0.48 |
| Mn (mg kg-1) | 35.9a | 34.1a | 304.0a | 124.6 | 0.59 | 0.80 |
| Fe (mg kg-1) | 19.3a | 23.5a | 193.0a | 78.6 | 0.37 | 0.72 |
| Zn (mg kg-1) | 4.6b | 8.3b | 28.0a | 13.6 | 0.11 | 0.02 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).