Preprint Article Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

Comparison of the 10-, 14- and 20-Item CES-D Scores as Predictors of Cognitive Decline

Version 1 : Received: 20 September 2023 / Approved: 21 September 2023 / Online: 21 September 2023 (03:54:17 CEST)

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

Jauregi-Zinkunegi, A.; Langhough, R.; Johnson, S.C.; Mueller, K.D.; Bruno, D. Comparison of the 10-, 14- and 20-Item CES-D Scores as Predictors of Cognitive Decline. Brain Sci. 2023, 13, 1530. Jauregi-Zinkunegi, A.; Langhough, R.; Johnson, S.C.; Mueller, K.D.; Bruno, D. Comparison of the 10-, 14- and 20-Item CES-D Scores as Predictors of Cognitive Decline. Brain Sci. 2023, 13, 1530.

Abstract

The association between depressive symptomatology and cognitive decline has been examined using the Centre for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression Scale (CES-D), however, concerns have been raised about this self-report measure. Here, we examined how the CES-D total score from the 14- and 10-item versions compared to the 20-item version in predicting progression to cognitive decline from a cognitively unimpaired baseline. Data from 1,054 participants were analysed using ordinal logistic regression, alongside moderator and receiver-operating characteristics curve analyses. All baseline total scores significantly predicted progression to cognitive decline. The 14-item version was better than the 20-item version in predicting consensus diagnosis, as shown by their AICs, while also showing the highest accuracy when discriminating between participants by diagnosis at last visit. We did not find sex to moderate the relationship between CES-D score and cognitive decline. Current findings suggest the 10- and 14-item versions of the CES-D are comparable to the 20-item version, and that the 14-item version may be better at predicting longitudinal consensus diagnosis compared to the 20-item version.

Keywords

depression; CES-D; cognitive decline; MCI; aging

Subject

Social Sciences, Psychology

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.