Submitted:
04 September 2023
Posted:
07 September 2023
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
- allowing access to the house or its element to the courier delivering the package, who places the package in an electronic terminal secured with a confirmation code,
- leaving the package at the place of residence without the need to access the house, i.e., in the so-called home pickup box,
- delivery of the package to the local agency, which in turn delivers the package to the customer’s home,
- the use of pick-up points i.e., places where the customer can pick up the parcel on his own (they can be divided into self-service and those where the release of the parcel requires service by staff)
2. Scientific Literature Review
3. Materials and Methods
3.1. Research framework
3.2. Kano model
- Must-be attributes (M). It is a set of requirements that the recipient is not aware of, but they are extremely important from the perspective of shaping his satisfaction or dissatisfaction. This group is characterized by requirements whose fulfillment will not increase customer satisfaction, but their absence will result in customer dissatisfaction;
- One-dimensional attributes (O). This is a group of desired customer requirements. This means that their implementation increases satisfaction, but failure to meet these requirements will result in dissatisfaction;
- Attractive attributes (A). These are the service requirements to attract attention. Their fulfillment has a huge effect on the increase in satisfaction, while their failure will affect the customer’s feelings.
- Indifferent attributes (I). The presence or absence of these requirements will in no way affect the return or reduction of customer satisfaction. They are irrelevant;
- Questionable attributes (Q). This is a group of requirements about which there is no reliable information on whether they are relevant to the consumer;
- Reverse attributes (R). They appear when the opposite of a given feature is important to the client.
- – if (A+M+O) > (R+Q+I), then finally the category from the group A, M, O with the highest value is selected;
- – if (A+M+O) < (R+Q+I), then finally the category from the R, Q, I group with the highest value is selected.
4. Results
- 24/7 customer support;
- additional parcel locker services (e.g., refrigerated lockers, laundry services);
- adjusting the size of package to the size of the box (parameter related to problems with removing the parcel when the parcel tightly fills the box);
- advertisement on parcel locker;
- convenience of receiving and sending parcels;
- dedicated application;
- ease of use of the parcel locker;
- improvements for people with disabilities;
- methods of the parcel pick-up (standard or automatically via smartphone);
- methods of the parcel drop-off (standard or online without the need to print the shipping label, which is attached by the courier upon receipt);
- natural environment awareness;
- parcel locker location (related not only to a satisfactory distance, but also to the place, for example close to work or school);
- parcel locker novelty (parameter related to modernity, because the newly created APLs sometimes differ from the previous ones);
- parcel locker service time (time needed for parcel pick-up or drop-off);
- parking next to the parcel locker;
- placing the parcel in a specific box (the service is called: easy access zone and enables placing parcels in the lower compartments in the parcel locker);
- possibility of using a multi-locker (allows to pick-up multiple parcels from multiple senders by one receiver or drop-off multiple parcels to one receiver);
- security of the parcel placed in the locker;
- size of the parcel locker (number of boxes);
- temperature inside;
- time window for parcel pick-up.
5. Discussion
6. Conclusions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
| APLs | automated parcel lockers |
| APS | automated parcel stations |
| BOPIL® | Buy Online, Pick-up in Locker |
| BOPIS | Buy Online, Pick-Up In-Store |
| COD | cash on delivery |
| CPR | consumer participation readiness |
| FMC | 15-minute city |
| IoT | Internet of Things |
| MPL | mobile parcel locker |
| NFC | near field communication |
| O2O | online-to-offline |
| OC | omnichannel |
| OOH | out-of-home |
| PUDO | Pick Up Drop Off |
| SSTs | Self-Service Technologies |
References
- Chevalier, S.; Global retail e-commerce sales worldwide from 2014 to 2026. Statista 2022, eMarketer, Jul. 2022. Available online: https://www.statista.com/statistics/379046/worldwide-retail-e-commerce-sales/ (accessed 30 June 2023).
- Allen, J., Piecyk, M., Piotrowska, M., McLeod, F., Cherrett, T., Ghali, K., ... & Austwick, M. Understanding the impact of e-commerce on last-mile light goods vehicle activity in urban areas: The case of London. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 2018, 61, pp. 325-338. [CrossRef]
- Dey, B. K., Sarkar, M., Chaudhuri, K., & Sarkar, B. Do you think that the home delivery is good for retailing?. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 2023, 72, 103237. [CrossRef]
- Sarkar, B., Dey, B. K., Sarkar, M., & AlArjani, A. A sustainable online-to-offline (O2O) retailing strategy for a supply chain management under controllable lead time and variable demand. Sustainability 2021, 13(4), 1756. [CrossRef]
- Choi, S. B., Dey, B. K., & Sarkar, B. Retailing and servicing strategies for an imperfect production with variable lead time and backorder under online-to-offline environment. Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization 2023, 19(7), pp. 4804-4843. [CrossRef]
- Hübner, A., Holzapfel, A., & Kuhn, H. Distribution systems in omni-channel retailing. Business Research 2016, 9, pp. 255-296. [CrossRef]
- Allen, J., Thorne, G., & Browne, M. BESTUFS good practice guide on urban freight transport. 2007. Available online: https://www.eltis.org/sites/default/files/trainingmaterials/english_bestufs_guide.pdf (accessed 30 June 2023).
- Iwan, S., Kijewska, K., & Lemke, J. Analysis of parcel lockers’ efficiency as the last mile delivery solution–the results of the research in Poland. Transportation Research Procedia 2016, 12, pp. 644-655. [CrossRef]
- Koncová, D., Kremeňová, I., & Fabuš, J. Last Mile and its Latest Changes in Express, Courier and Postal Services Bound to E-commerce. Transport and Communications 2022, 12, pp. 12-17. [CrossRef]
- Vakulenko, Y., Hellström, D., & Hjort, K. What’s in the parcel locker? Exploring customer value in e-commerce last mile delivery. Journal of Business Research 2018, 88, 421-427. [CrossRef]
- IPC. Annual Review 2020 Supporting posts during the COVID-19 crisis. Available online: https://www.ipc.be/sector-data/reports-library/ipc-reports-brochures/annual-review2020 (accessed 30 June 2023).
- Ducret, R. Parcel deliveries and urban logistics: Changes and challenges in the courier express and parcel sector in Europe — The French case. Research in Transportation Business & Management 2014, 11, pp. 15-22. [CrossRef]
- Morganti, E., Seidel, S., Blanquart, C., Dablanc, L., & Lenz, B. The impact of e-commerce on final deliveries: alternative parcel delivery services in France and Germany. Transportation Research Procedia 2014, 4, pp. 178-190. [CrossRef]
- InPost. Our history. Available online: https://inpost.eu/who-we-are/our-history (accessed 30 June 2023).
- Zurel, Ö., Van Hoyweghen, L., Braes, S., & Seghers, A. Parcel lockers, an answer to the pressure on the last mile delivery? New business and regulatory strategies in the postal sector 2018, pp. 299-312. [CrossRef]
- PD CEN/TS 16819:2015. Postal services. Parcel boxes for end use. Technical features. 2015. Standard ISBN: 978 0 580 88556 3.
- Agatz, N., Campbell, A., Fleischmann, M., & Savelsbergh, M. Time slot management in attended home delivery. Transportation Science 2011, 45(3), 435-449. [CrossRef]
- Mackert, J. Choice-based dynamic time slot management in attended home delivery. Computers & Industrial Engineering 2019, 129, 333-345. [CrossRef]
- Fallahtafti, A., Karimi, H., Ardjmand, E., & Ghalehkhondabi, I. Time slot management in selective pickup and delivery problem with mixed time windows. Computers & Industrial Engineering 2021, 159, 107512. [CrossRef]
- Otim, S., & Grover, V. An empirical study on web-based services and customer loyalty. European Journal of Information Systems 2006, 15(6), pp. 527-541. [CrossRef]
- Peng, D. X., & Lu, G. Exploring the impact of delivery performance on customer transaction volume and unit price: evidence from an assembly manufacturing supply chain. Production and Operations Management 2017, 26(5), pp. 880-902. [CrossRef]
- Garver, M.S., Williams, Z., Taylor, G.S., and Wynne, W.R. Modelling Choice in Logistics: A Managerial Guide and Application. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management 2012, 42(2), pp. 128–51. [CrossRef]
- Nguyen, D. H., De Leeuw, S., Dullaert, W., & Foubert, B. P. What is the right delivery option for you? Consumer preferences for delivery attributes in online retailing. Journal of Business Logistics 2019, 40(4), pp. 299-321. [CrossRef]
- Rao S., Griffis S.E., Goldsby T.J. Failure to deliver? Linking online order fulfillment glitches with future purchase behavior. Journal of Operations Management 2011, 29(7-8), pp. 692-703. [CrossRef]
- Joerss, M., Neuhaus, F., & Schröder, J. How customer demands are reshaping last-mile delivery. The McKinsey Quarterly 2016, 17, pp. 1-5.
- Popli, A., & Mishra, S. Factors of perceived risk affecting online purchase decisions of consumers. Pacific Business Review International 2015, 8(2), pp. 49-58.
- Yang, L., Xu, M., & Xing, L. Exploring the core factors of online purchase decisions by building an E-Commerce network evolution model. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 2022, 64, 102784. [CrossRef]
- Tiwari, P., & Joshi, H. Factors influencing online purchase intention towards online shopping of Gen Z. International Journal of Business Competition and Growth 2020, 7(2), pp. 175-187. [CrossRef]
- van Gelder, K. Factors that influence online purchase decisions in the United States and the United Kingdom in 2022. Statista 2023. Available online: https://www.statista.com/statistics/628782/internet-user-purchase-influence-factors/ (accessed 30 June 2023).
- Chen, C.F., White, C., & Hsieh, Y.E. The role of consumer participation readiness in automated parcel station usage intentions. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 2020, 54, pp. 102063. [CrossRef]
- Meuter, M.L., Ostrom, A.L., Bitner, M.J., & Roundtree, R. The influence of technology anxiety on consumer use and experiences with self-service technologies. Journal of Business Research 2003, 56(11), pp. 899-906. [CrossRef]
- Vo, K.N., Le, A.N.H., Thanh Tam, L., & Ho Xuan, H. Immersive experience and customer responses towards mobile augmented reality applications: The moderating role of technology anxiety. Cogent Business & Management 2022, 9(1), 2063778. [CrossRef]
- Gelderman, C.J., Paul, W., & Van Diemen, R. Choosing self-service technologies or interpersonal services—The impact of situational factors and technology-related attitudes. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 2011, 18(5), pp. 414-421. [CrossRef]
- Alloulbi, A., Öz, T., & Alzubi, A. The use of artificial intelligence for smart decision-making in smart cities: a moderated mediated model of technology anxiety and internal threats of IoT. Mathematical Problems in Engineering 2022, 2022, 6707431. [CrossRef]
- Yuen, K. F., Wang, X., Ng L.T.W, & Wong, Y.D. An investigation of customers’ intention to use self-collection services for last-mile delivery, Transport Policy 2018, 66, pp. 1-8. [CrossRef]
- Neto, L. G., & Vieira, J. G. V. An investigation of consumer intention to use pick-up point services for last-mile distribution in a developing country. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 2023, 74, 103425. [CrossRef]
- Yuen, K.F., Wang, X., Ma, F., & Wong, Y.D. The determinants of customers’ intention to use smart lockers for last-mile deliveries. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 2019, 49, pp. 316-326. [CrossRef]
- Kedia, A., Kusumastuti, D., & Nicholson, A. Acceptability of collection and delivery points from consumers’ perspective: A qualitative case study of Christchurch city. Case Studies on Transport Policy 2017, 5(4), 587-595. [CrossRef]
- Schaefer, J. S., & Figliozzi, M.A. Spatial accessibility and equity analysis of Amazon parcel lockers facilities. Journal of Transport Geography 2021, 97, 103212. [CrossRef]
- Tsai, Y.T., & Tiwasing, P. Customers’ intention to adopt smart lockers in last-mile delivery service: A multi-theory perspective. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 2021, 61, 102514. [CrossRef]
- Deutsch, Y., & Golany, B. A parcel locker network as a solution to the logistics last mile problem. International Journal of Production Research 2018, 56(1-2), pp. 251-261. [CrossRef]
- Lee, H.J., & Lyu, J. Personal values as determinants of intentions to use self-service technology in retailing. Computers in Human Behavior 2016, 60, pp. 322-332. [CrossRef]
- Milioti, C., Pramatari, K., & Kelepouri, I. Modelling consumers’ acceptance for the click and collect service. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 2020, 56, 102149. [CrossRef]
- de Oliveira, L. K., Morganti, E., Dablanc, L., & de Oliveira, R.L.M. Analysis of the potential demand of automated delivery stations for e-commerce deliveries in Belo Horizonte, Brazil. Research in Transportation Economics 2017, 65, pp. 34-43. [CrossRef]
- Rai, H.B., Verlinde, S., & Macharis, C. Unlocking the failed delivery problem? Opportunities and challenges for smart locks from a consumer perspective. Research in Transportation Economics 2021, 87, 100753. [CrossRef]
- Lai, P.L., Jang, H., Fang, M., & Peng, K. Determinants of customer satisfaction with parcel locker services in last-mile logistics. The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics 2022, 38(1), pp. 25-30. [CrossRef]
- Gupta, H. Evaluating service quality of airline industry using hybrid best worst method and VIKOR. Journal of Air Transport Management 2018, 68, pp. 35-47. [CrossRef]
- Li, Y., & Shang, H. Service quality, perceived value, and citizens’ continuous-use intention regarding e-government: Empirical evidence from China. Information & Management 2020, 57(3), 103197. [CrossRef]
- Durmaz D. Analysis of the level of customer service quality on the example of Inpost. Engineering thesis. 2022 (promoter: Maria Cieśla).
- Motyka M. Research on the preferences of users of InPost services in the field of self-service drop-off and pick-up points in the city of Żory. Engineering thesis. 2022 (promoter: Maria Cieśla).
- Mosur K. Analysis of the quality level of courier services on the example of Inpost. Engineering thesis. 2022 (promoter: Maria Cieśla).
- Kopała P. Improving the customer service process of courier services on the example of InPost. Engineering thesis. 2023 (promoter: Maria Cieśla).
- Czechowski M. Testing the quality of the customer service process of courier services at the sending and receiving points Engineering thesis. 2023 (promoter: Maria Cieśla).
- Kano, N. Attractive quality and must-be quality. Journal of the Japanese society for quality control 1984, 31(4), 147-156.
- Berger, C. Kano’s methods for understanding customer-defined quality. Center for quality management journal 1993, 2(4), 3-36.
- Wang, T., & Ji, P. Understanding customer needs through quantitative analysis of Kano’s model. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management 2010, 27(2), 173-184. [CrossRef]
- Mikulić, J., & Prebežac, D. A critical review of techniques for classifying quality attributes in the Kano model. Managing Service Quality: An International Journal 2011, 21(1), 46-66. [CrossRef]
- Witell, L., Löfgren, M., & Dahlgaard, J. J. Theory of attractive quality and the Kano methodology–the past, the present, and the future. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence 2013, 24(11-12), 1241-1252. [CrossRef]
- Kermanshachi, S., Nipa, T.J., & Nadiri, H. Service quality assessment and enhancement using Kano model. Plos One 2022, 17(2), e0264423. [CrossRef]
- Zobnina, M., & Rozhkov, A. Listening to the voice of the customer in the hospitality industry: Kano model application. Worldwide Hospitality and Tourism Themes 2018, 10(4), 436-448. [CrossRef]
- Gupta, P., & Srivastava, R.K. Customer satisfaction for designing attractive qualities of healthcare service in India using Kano model and quality function deployment. MIT International Journal of Mechanical Engineering 2011, 1(2), 101-107.
- Pai, F.Y., Yeh, T.M., & Tang, C.Y. Classifying restaurant service quality attributes by using Kano model and IPA approach. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence 2018, 29(3-4), 301-328. [CrossRef]
- Chen, K.J., Yeh, T.M., Pai, F.Y., & Chen, D.F. Integrating refined kano model and QFD for service quality improvement in healthy fast-food chain restaurants. International journal of environmental research and public health 2018, 15(7), 1310. [CrossRef]
- Zhou, Z., Wang, L., & Dong, Y. Research on innovative design of community mutual aid elderly care service platform based on Kano model. Heliyon 2023, 9(5). [CrossRef]
- Xie, M., & Kim, H.B. User acceptance of hotel service robots using the quantitative kano model. Sustainability 2022, 14(7), 3988. [CrossRef]
- Shahin, A., Pourhamidi, M., Antony, J., & Hyun Park, S. Typology of Kano models: a critical review of literature and proposition of a revised model. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management 2013, 30(3), 341-358. [CrossRef]
- Lo, C.H. Application of Refined Kano’s Model to Shoe Production and Consumer Satisfaction Assessment. Sustainability 2021, 13(5), 2484. [CrossRef]
- Schvaneveldt, S.J., Enkawa, T., & Miyakawa, M. Consumer evaluation perspectives of service quality: evaluation factors and two-way model of quality. Total quality management 1991, 2(2), 149-162. [CrossRef]
- Matzler, K., & Hinterhuber, H.H. How to make product development projects more successful by integrating Kano’s model of customer satisfaction into quality function deployment. Technovation 1998, 18(1), 25-38. [CrossRef]
- Shahin, A., & Mohammadi Shahiverdi, S. Estimating customer lifetime value for new product development based on the Kano model with a case study in automobile industry. Benchmarking: An International Journal 2015, 22(5), 857-873. [CrossRef]
- Xu, Q., Jiao, R.J., Yang, X., Helander, M., Khalid, H.M., & Opperud, A. An analytical Kano model for customer need analysis. Design studies 2009, 30(1), 87-110. [CrossRef]
- Tang, Y.M., Chau, K.Y., Xu, D., & Liu, X. Consumer perceptions to support IoT based smart parcel locker logistics in China. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 2021, 62, 102659. [CrossRef]
- Niederprüm, A., & van Lienden, W. Parcel locker stations: A solution for the last mile? (No. 2). WIK Working Paper. 2021. Available online: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/253743/1/WIK-WP-No2.pdf (accessed 15 July 2023).
- Akdoğan, K., & Özceylan, E. Parcel Locker Applications in Turkey. Beykent Üniversitesi Fen ve Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi 2023, 16(1), 43-54. [CrossRef]
- Stojanov, M. Automated parcel terminals-commercialization of the system for automated post services. Известия на Съюза на учените-Варна. Серия Икoнoмически науки 2022, 11(2), 21-28.
- Ji, S.F., Luo, R.J., & Peng, X.S. A probability guided evolutionary algorithm for multi-objective green express cabinet assignment in urban last-mile logistics. International Journal of Production Research 2019, 57(11), 3382-3404. [CrossRef]
- Lagorio, A., & Pinto, R. The parcel locker location issues: An overview of factors affecting their location. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Information Systems, Logistics and Supply Chain: Interconnected Supply Chains in an Era of Innovation, ILS. April 2020. pp. 414-421.
- Wróbel-Jędrzejewska, M., & Polak, E. The operation analysis of the innovative MainBox food storage device. Applied Sciences 2021, 11(16), 7682. [CrossRef]
- An, H.S., Park, A., Song, J.M., & Chung, C. Consumers’ adoption of parcel locker service: protection and technology perspectives. Cogent Business & Management 2022, 9(1), 2144096. [CrossRef]
- Lee, M.H., Yu, T.S., & Lim, S.J. An Unmanned Smart Parcel Locker System with a Parcel Sterilizer. Journal of Computational and Theoretical Nanoscience 2021, 18(5), 1530-153. [CrossRef]
- Keen, C.C., Liang, C.H., & Sham, R. The effectiveness of parcel locker that affects the delivery options among online shoppers in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. International Journal of Logistics Systems and Management 2022, 41(4), 485-502. [CrossRef]
- Guerrero-Lorente, J., Gabor, A. F., & Ponce-Cueto, E. Omnichannel logistics network design with integrated customer preference for deliveries and returns. Computers & Industrial Engineering 2020, 144, 106433. [CrossRef]
- Iyer, P., Veldman, R., & Zhang, Y.Universal Locker Systems for urban areas. In 53rd ORSNZ Annual Conference. December 2019.
- Lachapelle, U., Burke, M., Brotherton, A., & Leung, A. Parcel locker systems in a car dominant city: Location, characterisation and potential impacts on city planning and consumer travel access. Journal of Transport Geography 2018, 71, 1-14. [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y., Bi, M., Lai, J., & Chen, Y. Locating movable parcel lockers under stochastic demands. Symmetry 2020, 12(12), 2033. [CrossRef]
- Schwerdfeger, S., & Boysen, N. Who moves the locker? A benchmark study of alternative mobile parcel locker concepts. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 2022, 142, 103780. [CrossRef]
- Lazarević, D., Dobrodolac, M., & Marković, D. Implementation of Mobile Parcel Lockers in Delivery Systems–Analysis by the AHP Approach. International Journal for Traffic and Transport Engineering 2023, 13(1). [CrossRef]




| Tested attitude | Positive variant | 1) I like it that way |
| 2) It must be that way | ||
| 3) I am neutral | ||
| 4) I can live with it that way | ||
| 5) I dislike it that way | ||
| Negativevariant | 1) I like it that way | |
| 2) It must be that way | ||
| 3) I am neutral | ||
| 4) I can live with it that way | ||
| 5) I dislike it that way |
| Tested attitude | Negativevariant | |||||
| 1) I like it that way | 2) It must be that way | 3) I am neutral | 4) I can live with it that way | 5) I dislike it that way | ||
| Positive variant | 1) I like it that way | Q | A | A | A | O |
| 2) It must be that way | R | I | I | I | M | |
| 3) I am neutral | R | I | I | I | M | |
| 4) I can live with it that way | R | I | I | I | M | |
| 5) I dislike it that way | R | R | R | R | Q | |
| Attribute | Proportion of Each Type of Kano Quality Attribute (%) |
Classification Type |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M | O | A | I | Q | R | ||
| 24/7 customer support | 20.52 | 5.13 | 14.53 | 57.25 | 0.86 | 1.71 | I |
| Additional APLs services | 11.11 | 35.89 | 6.87 | 10.26 | 3.42 | 32.48 | O |
| Adjusting the size of package to the size of the box | 54.70 | 7.69 | 8.55 | 28.21 | 0.00 | 0.85 | M |
| Advertisement on APLs | 19.66 | 15.38 | 12.82 | 35.04 | 1.71 | 15.38 | I |
| Convenience of receiving and sending parcels | 7.69 | 5.13 | 61.54 | 11.97 | 2.56 | 11.11 | A |
| Dedicated application | 57.26 | 14.53 | 8.55 | 18.80 | 0.00 | 0.85 | M |
| Ease of use of APLs | 19.66 | 31.62 | 12.82 | 17.95 | 0.00 | 17.95 | O |
| Improvements for people with disabilities | 30.77 | 7.69 | 15.38 | 45.30 | 0.00 | 0.85 | M |
| Methods of the parcel pick-up | 24.79 | 10.26 | 27.35 | 35.04 | 0.85 | 1.71 | A |
| Methods of the parcel drop-off | 7.69 | 3.42 | 20.51 | 59.83 | 6.84 | 1.71 | I |
| Natural environment awareness | 19.66 | 5.98 | 16.24 | 57.26 | 0.00 | 0.85 | I |
| Parcel locker location | 42.74 | 6.84 | 13.68 | 31.62 | 2.56 | 2.56 | M |
| Parcel locker novelty | 15.38 | 19.66 | 7.69 | 52.14 | 0.85 | 4.27 | I |
| Parcel locker service time | 21.37 | 16.24 | 36.75 | 21.37 | 1.71 | 2.56 | A |
| Parking next to APL | 18.80 | 52.14 | 6.84 | 20.51 | 0.00 | 1.71 | O |
| Placing the parcel in a specific box | 43.59 | 12.82 | 10.26 | 29.91 | 0.85 | 2.56 | M |
| Possibility of using a multi-locker | 20.51 | 11.11 | 14.53 | 36.75 | 1.71 | 15.38 | I |
| Security of the parcel placed in APL | 14.53 | 43.59 | 17.95 | 13.68 | 2.56 | 7.69 | O |
| Size of the APL | 11.11 | 6.84 | 19.66 | 58.12 | 0.00 | 4.27 | I |
| Temperature inside APL | 19.66 | 4.27 | 10.26 | 59.83 | 3.42 | 2.56 | I |
| Time window for parcel pick-up | 5.98 | 1.71 | 11.11 | 64.96 | 2.56 | 13.68 | I |
| Classification Type |
Attribute | Satisfaction coefficient ) |
Dissatisfaction coefficient |
Total Satisfaction Index |
Ranking |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Must-be (M) |
Dedicated application | 0.2328 | -0.7241 | -0.9569 | 1 |
| Placing the parcel in a specific box | 0.2389 | -0.5841 | -0.8230 | 2 | |
| Adjusting the size of package to the size of the box | 0.1638 | -0.6293 | -0.7931 | 3 | |
| Parcel locker location | 0.2162 | -0.5225 | -0.7387 | 4 | |
| Improvements for people with disabilities | 0.2328 | -0.3879 | -0.6207 | 5 | |
| One-dimensional (O) | Additional APLs services | 0.6667 | -0.7333 | -1.4000 | 1 |
| Security of the parcel placed in APL | 0.6857 | -0.6476 | -1.3333 | 2 | |
| Parking next to APL | 0.6000 | -0.7217 | -1.3217 | 3 | |
| Ease of use of APLs | 0.5417 | -0.6250 | -1.1667 | 4 | |
| Attractive (A) | Parcel locker service time | 0.5536 | -0.3929 | 0.9464 | 1 |
| Convenience of receiving and sending parcels | 0.7723 | -0.1485 | 0.9208 | 2 | |
| Methods of the parcel pick-up | 0.3860 | -0.3596 | 0.7456 | 3 | |
| Indifferent (I) | Advertisement on APLs | 0.3402 | -0.4227 | -0.7629 | 1 |
| Possibility of using a multi-locker | 0.3093 | -0.3814 | -0.6907 | 2 | |
| Parcel locker novelty | 0.2883 | -0.3694 | -0.6577 | 3 | |
| Natural environment awareness | 0.2241 | -0.2586 | -0.4828 | 4 | |
| 24/7 customer support | 0.2018 | -0.2632 | -0.4649 | 5 | |
| Size of the APL | 0.2768 | -0.1875 | -0.4643 | 6 | |
| Temperature inside | 0.1545 | -0.2545 | -0.4091 | 7 | |
| Methods of the parcel drop-off | 0.2617 | -0.1215 | -0.3832 | 8 | |
| Time window for parcel pick-up | 0.1531 | -0.0918 | -0.2449 | 9 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).