Submitted:
24 August 2023
Posted:
25 August 2023
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Theoretical foundation
2.1. UTAUT theory
2.2. Personal innovativeness theory
2.3. Self-efficacy theory
3. Hypotheses development
3.1. Performance expectancy and willingness to improve digital literacy
3.2. Social influence and willingness to enhance digital literacy
3.3. Effort expectancy and willingness to improve digital literacy
3.4. Personal innovativeness and willingness to enhance digital literacy
3.5. Self-efficacy and willingness to improve digital literacy
3.6. Facilitating condition and digital literacy improvement behavior
3.7. Willingness and behavior to enhance digital literacy
3.8. The mediating role of willingness to enhance digital literacy
3.9. The moderating effect of gender, age, and experience
4. Research methodology
4.1. Research model
4.2. Questionnaire design
4.3. Data collection and analysis method
4.4. Demographic profile
5. Results of statistical analysis
5.1. Measurement model analysis
5.2. Structural equation model analysis
5.3. Test of Mesomeric effect of variables
5.4. Verification of the moderating effect of variables
6. Discussion
6.1. Mechanism Discussion on the Direct Influencing Factors of Tea Farmers' willingness to Improve Digital Literacy
6.2. Mechanism Discussion on Factors Influencing Tea Farmers' Digital Literacy Improvement Behavior
6.3. Discussion on the Mechanism of Indirect Factors Influencing Tea Farmers' willingness to Improve Digital Literacy
6.4. Discussion on the regulatory mechanisms of gender, age, and experience
7. Conclusion
7.2. Implement differentiated and tiered training strategies to enhance tea farmers' self-efficacy
7.3. Expand training types, channels, and forms to enhance tea farmers' expectancy for hard work
7.4. Promote the inclusive effect and practical value of digital intelligence empowerment, and enhance the performance expectancy of tea farmers
7.5. Explore individual innovative tea farmers and cultivate digital talents in the tea industry
7.6. Strengthen policy support and assistance guarantees, optimize the convenient conditions for tea farmers to enhance their digital literacy
8. Limitations and future studies
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Cesco Stefano,Sambo Paolo,Borin Maurizio, et al. (2023). Smart agriculture and digital twins:Applications and challenges in a vision of sustainability. European Journal of Agronomy,2023,146.
- Walter A, Finger R, Huber R, et al. (2017). Opinion: Smart farming is key to developing sustainable agriculture. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2017, 114(24): 6148-6150.
- Disha, G., and Mansaf, A. (2023). Smart agriculture: a literature review. J. Manag. Anal. [CrossRef]
- Jing Shen , Feng-Tzu Huang , Rung-Jiun Chou. (2021). Rural revitalization of agricultural reclamation - experience from Xiping Tea Ancient Town . Land, 2021-09-03 . [CrossRef]
- Eshet Y. (2004). Digital literacy: A conceptual framework for survival skills in the digital era. Journal of educational multimedia and hypermedia, 2004, 13(1): 93-106.
- Martin A, Grudziecki J, DigEuLit. (2006). Concepts and tools for digital literacy development. Innovation in teaching and learning in information and computer sciences, 2006, 5(4): 249-267.
- Alexander B, Adams S, Cummins M. (2016). Digital literacy: An NMC Horizon project strategic brief. The New Media Consortium, 2016.
- Guzman Mendoza Jose Eder,Munoz Arteaga Jaime,Alvarez Rodriguez Francisco Javier. (2016). An Architecture Oriented to Digital Literacy Services: An Ecosystem Approach. IEEE Latin America Transactions,2016,14(5).
- Havrilova L H, Topolnik Y V. (2017). Digital culture, digital literacy, digital competence as the modern educational phenomena. Information Technologies and Learning Tools, 2017, 61(5): 1-14.
- Ramírez-Montoya M S, Mena J, Rodríguez-Arroyo J A. (2017). In-service teachers’self- perceptions of digital competence and OER use as determined by a xMOOC training course. Computers in Human Behavior, 2017, 77: 356-364. [CrossRef]
- Napal Fraile M, Peñalva-Vélez A, Mendióroz Lacambra A M. (2018). Development of digital competence in secondary education teachers’training. Education Sciences, 2018, 8(3): 104.
- Littlejohn, A., Beetham, H., and McGill, L. (2012). Learning at the digital frontier: a review of digital literacies in theory and practice. J. Comput. Assist. Learn. [CrossRef]
- Cetindamar Kozanoglu, D., and Abedin, B. (2020). Understanding the role of employees in digital transformation: conceptualization of digital literacy of employees as a multi-dimensional organizational affordance. J. Enterp. Inf. Manag. [CrossRef]
- Hackfort, S. (2021). Patterns of Inequalities in Digital Agriculture: A Systematic Literature Review. Sustainability. [CrossRef]
- Danhua, P., and Zhonggen, Y. (2022). A Literature Review of Digital Literacy over Two Decades. Educ. Res. Int. [CrossRef]
- Shahrokh, N., Mark, D. R., and Matin, M. K. (2022). Workplace literacy skills—how information and digital literacy affect adoption of digital technology. J. Doc. [CrossRef]
- Gutiérrez-Ángel, N., Sánchez-García, J., Mercader-Rubio, I., García-Martín, J., and Brito-Costa, S. (2022). Digital literacy in the university setting: A literature review of empirical studies between 2010 and 2021. Front. Psychol. [CrossRef]
- Catherine, A., and Bertrand, A. (2022). Key factors in digital literacy in learning and education: a systematic literature review using text mining. Educ. Inf. Technol. [CrossRef]
- Campanozzi, L. L., Gibelli, F., Bailo, P., Nittari, G., Sirignano, A., Ricci, G. (2023). The role of digital literacy in achieving health equity in the third millennium society: A literature review. Front. Public Health. [CrossRef]
- Reddy, P., Chaudhary, K., and Hussein, S. (2023). A digital literacy model to narrow the digital literacy skills gap. Heliyon. [CrossRef]
- Bawden D. (2001). Information and digital literacies: a review of concepts. Journal of documentation, 2001.
- Gou, K., and Wang, L. (2022). Tripartite Evolutionary Game of Agricultural Service Scale Management and Small Farmers' Interests under Government Preferential Policies. Comput. Intell. Neurosci. [CrossRef]
- Gilster P. (1997). Digital literacy[M].John Wiley & Sons,Inc.,1997.
- Li, S. Y., and Yuan, Q. J. (2020). UTAUT and its application and prospect in the field of information system research. J. Mod. Informat. 40, 168–177.
- Chen, M., and Liang, Y. K. (2021). Research on user adoption model of open government data-based on UTAUT theory. J. Journal of Modern Information. 41, 160–168. [CrossRef]
- Ronaghi, M.H.; Forouharfar, A. (2020). A contextualized study of the usage of the Internet of things (IoTs) in smart farming in a typical Middle Eastern Country within the context of Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology Model (UTAUT). Technol. Soc. 2020, 63, 101415. [CrossRef]
- Von Veltheim, F.R.; Heise, H. (2021). German farmers’ attitudes on adopting autonomous field robots: An empirical survey. Agriculture 2021, 11, 216. [CrossRef]
- Beza, E.; Reidsma, P.; Poortvliet, M.; Misker Belay, M.; Bijen, B.S.; Kooistra, L. (2018). Exploring farmers’ intentions to adopt mobile short message service (SMS) for citizen science in agriculture. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2018, 151, 295–310. [CrossRef]
- Narine, L.K.; Harder, A.; Roberts, T.G. (2019). Farmers’ intention to use text messaging for extension services in Trinidad. J. Agric. Educ. Ext. 2019, 25, 293–306.
- Michels, M.; Bonke, V.; Musshoff, O. (2020). Understanding the adoption of smartphone apps in crop protection. Precis. Agric. 2020, 21, 1209–1226.
- Molina-Maturano, J.; Verhulst, N.; Tur-Cardona, J.; Güereña, J.T.; Gardeazábal-Monsalve, A.; Govaerts, B.; Speelman, S. (2021). Understanding smallholder farmers’ intention to adopt agricultural apps: The role of mastery approach and innovation hubs in Mexico. Agronomy 2021, 11, 194.
- Li Qin, Li Yi, Hao Shujun. (2019). Classification estimation of moderate scale management of agricultural land - based on calculations in different regions under different terrains. Journal of Agriculture and Forestry Economic Management, 2019,18 (01): 101-109.
- Fu Lei, Sun Tong, Fang Shiming. (2021). Research on the Factors Influencing the Expansion of Tea Business in Anhui Province . Tea Communication, 2021,48 (01): 153-160.
- Hall B F, Leveen E P. (1978). Farm size and economic efficiency: The case of California. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1978, 60(4): 589-600.
- Yu Liu,Binjian Yan,Yue Wang,Yingheng Zhou. (2019). Will land transfer always increase technical efficiency in China?—A land cost perspective. Land Use Policy,2019,82.
- Venkatesh V,Morris M G,Davis G B, et al. (2003). User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View. MIS Quarterly,2003,27(3):425-478.
- MIDGLEY D, DOWLING G R. (1978). Innovativeness: The concept and its measurement. Journal of Consumer Research, 1978, 4 (4): 229-242. [CrossRef]
- Rogers Everett M.,Adhikarya Ronny. (1979).Diffusion of Innovations: An Up-To-Date Review and Commentary. Annals of the International Communication Association,1979,3(1).
- Agarwal R, Prasad J. (1998). The Antecedents and Consequences of User Perceptions in Information Technology Adoption. Decision Support Systems, 1998, 22(1):15-29. [CrossRef]
- Bandura A. (1977). Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological review,1977,84(2).
- LIMA E,HOPKINS T R,GURNEY E,et al. (2018). Drivers for precision livestock technology adoption:a study of factors associated with adoption of electronic identification technology by commercial sheep farmers in England and Wales.PLo S ONE,2018,13(1):e0190489: 1-17.
- Xie Kexiao, Zhu Yuerui, Ma Yongqiang, et al. (2022). Willingness of Tea Farmers to Adopt Ecological Agriculture Techniques Based on the UTAUT Extended Model. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health,2022,19(22).
- Davis F D. (1989). Perceived usefulness,perceived ease of use,and useracceptance of information technology.MIS Quarterly,1989,13(3):319-340.
- Zscheischler Jana,Brunsch Reiner,Rogga Sebastian,et al. (2022). Perceived risks and vulnerabilities of employing digitalization and digital data in agriculture–Socially robust orientations from a transdisciplinary process. Journal of Cleaner Production,2022,358.
- Van Raaij E M,Schepers J J L. (2008). The acceptance and use of a virtual learning environment in China.Computers&Education,2008,50(3):838-852.
- Tom Buchanan,Phillip Sainter,Gunter Saunders. (2013). Factors affecting faculty use of learning technologies: implications for models of technology adoption. J. Computing in Higher Education,2013,25(1). [CrossRef]
- A. C. Obienu , F. I. Amadin. (2020). Education and Information Technologies.2020-10-01. [CrossRef]
- Bandura Albert,Cervone Daniel.(1986). Differential engagement of self-reactive influences in cognitive motivation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,1986, 38(1).
- TSAI H S, LAROSE R. (2015). Broadband Internet adoption and utilization in the inner city:a comparison of competing theories. Computers in human behavior, 2015, 51(10):Part A:344-355.
- Kundu Arnab,Bej Tripti,Dey Nath Kedar. (2021). Investigating Effects of Self-Efficacy and Infrastructure on Teachers' ICT Use, an Extension of UTAUT. International Journal of Web-Based Learning and Teaching Technologies (IJWLTT),2021,16(6).
- Angel Herrero Crespo, Ignacio Rodriguez del Bosque. (2010). The influence of the commercial features of the Internet on the adoption of e-commerce by consumers. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications,2010,(9):562-575. [CrossRef]
- Ahikiriza Elizabeth,Wesana Joshua,Van Huylenbroeck Guido,et al. (2022). Farmer knowledge and the intention to use smartphone-based information management technologies in Uganda. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture,2022,202.
- TURNER A M, TAYLOR J O, HARTZLER A L, etc. (2021). Personal health information management among healthy older adults: Varying needs and approaches [J]. J Am Med Inform Assoc, 2021, 28(2): 322-333.
- Anil Gupta, Anish Yousaf, Abhishek Mishra. (2020). How pre-adoption expectancies shape post-adoption continuance intentions: An extended expectation-confirmation model. International Journal of Information Management,2020,52. [CrossRef]
- Zhang Weiwei. (2020). A Study on the User Acceptance Model of Artificial Intelligence Music Based on UTAUT. Journal of the Korea Society of Computer and Information,2020,25(6).
- Bollen Kenneth A, Lilly Adam G, Luo Lan. (2022). Selecting scaling indicators in structural equation models (sems). Psychological methods,2022.
- Ros, E.X.R.; Field, A. (2006). Discovering Statistics Using SPSS; SAGE Publications: London, UK, 2006; Volume 37, pp. 189–196.
- Bontis, N.; Crossan, M.M.; Hulland, J. (2002). Managing an organizational learning system by aligning stocks and flows. J. Manag. Stud. 2002, 39, 437–469. [CrossRef]
- Hair, J.F.; Ringle, C.M.; Sarstedt, M. (2013). Partial least squares structural equation modeling: Rigorous applications, better results and higher acceptance. Long Range Plan. 2013, 46, 1–12. [CrossRef]
- Kumar, R.; Trivedi, H.; Yadav, R.; Das, B.; Bist, A.S. (2016). Effect of drip irrigation on yield and water use efficiency on brinjal (Solanum melongena) cv. Pant samrat. Int. J. Eng. Sci. Res. Technol. 2016, 5, 7–17. [CrossRef]
- Anderson, J. C., and Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modelling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. J. Psychological Bulletin 103, 411–423.
- Fornell, C., and Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J. Mark. Res. 18, 39–50. [CrossRef]
- He, K.; Zhang, J.B.; Zeng, Y.M. (2018). Rural households’ willingness to accept compensation for energy utilization of crop straw in China. Energy 2018, 165, 562–571. [CrossRef]
- Nejadrezaei, N.; Sadegh Allahyari, M.; Sadeghzadeh, M.; Michailidis, A.; El Bilali, H. (2018). Factors affecting adoption of pressurized irrigation technology among olive farmers in Northern Iran. Appl. Water Sci. 2018, 8, 190. [CrossRef]
- Rusere, F.; Crespo, O.; Dicks, L.; Mkuhlani, S.; Francis, J.; Zhou, L. (2019). Enabling acceptance and use of ecological intensification options through engaging smallholder farmers in semi-arid rural Limpopo and Eastern Cape, South Africa. Agroecol. Sustain. Food Syst. 2019, 44, 696–725. [CrossRef]
- Amir, A.F.; Mohammad, K.-K.; Hamid, E. Bilali. (2020). Attitude components affecting adoption of soil and water conservation measures by paddy farmers in Rasht County, Northern Irfan. Land Use Policy 2020, 99, 104885.
- He, K.; Zhang, J.B.; Zeng, Y.M. (2020). Households’ willingness to pay for energy utilization of crop straw in rural China: Based on an improved UTAUT model. Energy Policy 2020, 140, 111373. [CrossRef]
- Sabbagh, M.; Gutierrez, L. (2022). Micro-irrigation technology adoption in the Bekaa Valley of Lebanon: A behavioural model. Sustainability 2022, 14, 7685. [CrossRef]
- Hayes, A. F. (2018). Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach, 2nd Edn. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
- Ullah, S., Kiani, U. S., Raza, B., and Mustafa, A. (2022). Consumers’ Intention to Adopt m-payment/m-banking: The Role of Their Financial Skills and Digital Literacy. Front. Psychol. [CrossRef]
- Aarsand, P. (2022). Categorization Activities in Norwegian Preschools: Digital Tools in Identifying, Articulating, and Assessing. Front. Psychol. [CrossRef]
- Marcu, I., Suciu, G., Bălăceanu, C., Vulpe, A., and Drăgulinescu, A. (2020). Arrowhead Technology for Digitalization and Automation Solution: Smart Cities and Smart Agriculture. Sensors. [CrossRef]
- Ayu, W., and Satoshi, N. (2022). Exploring the characteristics of smart agricultural development in Japan: Analysis using a smart agricultural kaizen level technology map. Comput. Electron. Agric. [CrossRef]
- Al-Qallaf, C. L., and Al-Mutairi, A. S. R. (2016). Digital literacy and digital content supports learning. The Electronic Library. [CrossRef]
- Bhaskara, S., and Bawa, K. S. (2021). Societal Digital Platforms for Sustainability: Agriculture. Sustainability. [CrossRef]
- Khan, N. A., Qijie, G., Sertse, S. F., Nabi, M. N., and Khan, P. (2019). Farmers’ use of mobile phone-based farm advisory services in Punjab, Pakistan. Inf. Dev. [CrossRef]
- Kang, S. J., Hyung, J. A., and Han, H. (2022). Health literacy and health care experiences of migrant workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative study. BMC Public Health. [CrossRef]
- Newton, J. E., Nettle, R., and Pryce, J. E. (2020). Farming smarter with big data: Insights from the case of Australia's national dairy herd milk recording scheme. Agric. Syst. [CrossRef]
- Menant, L., Gilibert, D., and Sauvezon, C. (2021). The application of acceptability models to Human Resource Information Systems: A literature review. Front. Psychol. [CrossRef]
- Jain, R., Garg, N., and Khera, S. N. (2022). Adoption of AI-Enabled Tools in Social Development Organizations in India: An Extension of UTAUT Model. Front. Psychol. [CrossRef]
- Wu, W., Zhang, B., Li, S., and Liu, H. (2022). Exploring Factors of the Willingness to Accept AI-Assisted Learning Environments: An Empirical Investigation Based on the UTAUT Model and Perceived Risk Theory. Front. Psychol. [CrossRef]
- Chen, L., Jia, J., and Wu, C. (2023). Factors influencing the behavioral intention to use contactless financial services in the banking industry: An application and extension of UTAUT model. Front. Psychol. [CrossRef]













Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).