Submitted:
22 August 2023
Posted:
24 August 2023
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
- a)
- Research scheme, animals, and feeding
- b)
- Analysis of brush border enzyme activity
- c)
- Determination of the activity of aminopeptidases A and N and dipeptidylpeptidase IV in the brush border
- d)
- Analysis of hormones in blood plasma by radioimmunoassay (RIA)
- e)
- Statistical analyses
3. Results
| Specification | Nutritional group | *P-value | |||
| NC | PC* | D1 | D2 | ||
| Number of sows | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | |
| Length of pregnancy (days) | 115.8 ± 2.4b | 115.2 ± 2.0 b | 114.7 ± 2.2a | 114.9 ± 2.2a | 0.01 |
| Average feed intake during lactation (kg) | 6.2 ± 0.7 | 6.3 ± 0.9 | 6.6 ± 0.8 | 6.8 ± 0.9 | ≤0.122 |
| Average number of piglets per litter | 10.7 ± 1.0a | 10.9 ± 1.2a | 12.1 ± 1.1b | 12.8 ± 1.3b | ≤0.006 |
| Average number of piglets with IUGR syndrome ≤ 1.1 kg b.w. | 0.86 ± 0.09ab | 0.98 ± 0.11b | 0.61 ± 0.06 a | 0.77 ± 0.07 ab | ≤0.012 |
| Number of piglets after weaning | 9.62 ± 0.95a | 10.15 ± 1.0a | 11.12 ± 1.1b | 11.75 ± 1.2b | 0.009 |
| Average weight loss of the sow during the piglet feeding period (kg) | 28.8 ± 2.8 | 29.2 ± 3.1 | 32.8 ± 3.2 | 33.5 ± 3.3 | 0.068 |
| Number of cases of MMA (mastitis, metritis and agalactia) syndrome in sows (heads) | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Piglet falls between 1 and 70 days of age (%) | 16.9 | 6.9 | 10.3 | 7.3 | |
| Specification | Nutritional group |
P-value |
|||
| NC | PC | D1 | D2 | ||
| Body weight at birth (g) Age at weaning (days) Body weight on weaning day or day 28 of life (kg) Daily gain from day 1 to day 28 of life (g) Body weight on day 42 of life (kg) Daily gain from day 1 to day 42 of life (g) Daily gain from day 28 to day 42 of life (g) Body weight on day 70 of life (kg) Daily gain from day 1 to day 70 (kg) Daily gain from day 42 to day 70 (kg) |
1,651 ± 366 27.4a ± 0.8 6.79 ± 1.54 183 ± 50 8.90 ± 2.05 173 ± 46 150 ± 67 abc 19.50 ± 4.84ab 255 ± 66a 378 ± 114 aA |
1,666 ± 317 27.2b ± 1.3 6.72 ± 1.95 180 ± 59 9.17 ± 2.37 177 ± 50 175 ± 75a 20.58 ± 3.91a 270 ± 56ab 407 ± 103 bA |
1,731 ± 308 26.7ab ± 0.8 6.92 ± 1.43 185 ± 49 9.39 ± 1.55 182 ± 35 176 ± 58b 20.06 ± 3.60c 262 ± 51a 381 ± 96aA |
1,756 ± 362 27.1 ± 1.7 7.52 ± 1.48 205 ± 49 9.91 ± 1.71 187 ± 37 171 ± 71c 21.67 ± 3.68bc 284 ± 49b 420 ± 91 cB |
0.2143 0.0248 0.052 0.1545 0.0632 0.0596 0.0375 0.0384 0.0362 0.0078 |
| Specification | Nutritional group |
P-value |
|||
| NC | PC | D1 | D2 | ||
| FCR during the rearing period, 1–28 days | 0.16 ± 0.02 | 0.10 ± 0.01 | 0.12 ± 0.01 | 0.09 ± 0.01 | 0.6362 |
| FCR during the rearing period, 28–42 days | 1.986 ± 0.14a | 1.704 ± 0.11ab | 1.932 ± 0.15a | 1.604 ± 0.10b | 0.0308 |
| FCR during the rearing period, 1–70 days | 1.26 ± 0.012 | 1.18 ± 0.013 | 1.27 ± 0.014 | 1.16 ± 0.011 | 0.1016 |
| Specification | Nutritional group |
P |
|||
| NC | PC | D1 | D2 | ||
| Rearing period, 1–28 days (g) | 28 ± 4 | 33 ± 5 | 27 ± 4 | 34 ± 5 | ≤0.346 |
| Rearing period, 28–42 days (g) | 216 ± 16 | 235 ± 19 | 218 ± 17 | 238 ± 20 | ≤0.524 |
| Rearing period, 1–70 days (g) | 338 ± 24ab | 392 ± 28a | 344 ± 25ab | 412 ± 32b | ≤0.038 |
4. Discussion
Author contributions
Financial support statement
Ethics approval
Data and model availability statement
Declaration of interest
References
- McMillen I.C., Robinson J.S. Developmental origins of the metabolic syndrome: Prediction, plasticity, and programming. Physiol. Rev. 2005, 85, 571–633. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gootwine E., Zenu A., Bor A., Yossafi S., Rosov A., Pollott G.,E. Genetic and economic analysis of introgression the B allele of the FecB (Booroola) gene into the Awassi and Assaf dairy breeds. Livestock Prod. Sci. 2001, 71, 49–58. [CrossRef]
- Mickiewicz M., Zabielski R., Grenier B., Le Normand L., Savary G., Holst J.J., Oswald I.P., Metges C.C., Guilloteau P. Structural and functional development of small intestine in intrauterine growth retarded porcine offspring born to gilts fed diets with differing protein ratios throughout pregnancy. J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 2012, 63, 225–239.
- Kucia M., Langhammer M., Gors S., Albrecht E., Hammon H.M., Nurnberg G., Metges C.,C. High-protein diet during gestation and lactation affects mammary gland mRNA abundance, milk composition and pre-weaning litter growth in mice. Animal 2011, 5, 268–277. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Andreasyan K., Ponsonby A.L., Dwyer T., Morley R., Riley M., Dear K., Cochrane J. Higher maternal dietary protein intake in late pregnancy is associated with a lower infant ponderal index at birth. Europ. J. Clinic. Nutr. 2007, 61, 498–508. [CrossRef]
- Meza-Herrera C.A., Ross T., Hallford D., Hawkins D., Gonzalez-Bulnes A. High periconceptional protein intake modifies uterine and embryonic relationships increasing early pregnancy losses and embryo growth retardation in sheep. Reprod. Domestic Animals 2010, 45, 723–728. [CrossRef]
- Gardner DK, Stilley KS and Lane M. High protein diet inhibits inner cell mass formation and increases apoptosis in mouse blastocysts developed in vitro by increasing the levels of ammonium in the reproductive tract. Reproduction, Fertility and Development 2004, 16, 190. [CrossRef]
- Rehfeldt C., Lang I.S., Gors S., Hennig U., Kalbe C., Stabenow B., Brussow K.P., Pfuhl R., Bellmann O., Nurnberg G., Otten W. Metges C.C. Limited and excess dietary protein during gestation affects growth and compositional traits in gilts and impairs offspring fetal growth. J. Anim. Sci. 2011, 89, 329–341. [CrossRef]
- Vanselow J., Kucia M., Langhammer M., Koczan D., Rehfeldt Ch. Metges C.C. Hepatic expression of the GH/JAK/STAT/IGF pathway, acute-phase response signaling and complement system are affected in mouse offspring by prenatal and early postnatal exposure to maternal high-protein diet. Europ. J. Clinic. Nutr. 2011, 50, 611-623. [CrossRef]
- Sarr O., Gondret F., Jamin A., Le Huerou-Luron I., Louveau I. A high-protein neonatal formula induces a temporary reduction of adiposity and changes later adipocyte physiology. Amer. J.Physiol.-Regul., Integr. Comparative Physiol. 2011. 300, 387-397. [CrossRef]
- Barker, D.J.P. Maternal nutrition, fetal nutrition, and disease in later life. Nutrition 1999, 13, 807–813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Metges C.C., Lang I., Hennig U., Brussow K-P., Kanitz E., Tuchscherer M., Schneider F., Weitzel J.M., Steinhoff-Ooster A., Sauerwein H., Bellmann O., Nürnberg G., Rehfeldt Ch. Otten W. Intrauterine growth retarded progeny of pregnant sows fed high protein:Low carbohydrate diet is related to metabolic energy deficit. PLoS One 2012, 7, e31390. [CrossRef]
- Davis T.A., Fiorotto M.L., Burrin D.G., Pond W.G., Nguyen H.V. Intrauterine growth restriction does not alter response of protein synthesis to feeding in newborn pigs. Amer. J. Physiol. 1997, 272, E877-E884. [CrossRef]
- Wu G., Pond W.G., Ott T., Bazer F.W. Maternal dietary protein deficiency decreases amino acid concentrations in fetal plasma and allantoic fluid of pigs. J. Nutr. 1998, 128, 894-990. [CrossRef]
- Desforges M., Lacey H.A., Glazier J.D., Greenwood S.L., Mynett K.J., Speake P.F., Sibley C.P. SNAT 4 isoform of system A amino acid transporter is expressed in human placenta. Amer. J. Physiol.-Cell Physiol. 2006, 290, 305-312. [CrossRef]
- Hales C.N., Barker D.J. The thrifty phenotype hypothesis. Brit. Med. Bulletin 2001, 60, 5-20. [CrossRef]
- Vinsky M.D., Novak S., Dixon W.T., Dyck M.K., Foxcroft G.R. Nutritional restriction in lactating primiparous sows selectively affects female embryo survival and overall litter development. Reprod. Fertiil. Development 2006, 18, 347–355. [CrossRef]
- Cole, D.J.A. Nutritional strategies to optimize reproduction in pigs. J. Reprod. Fertility 1990, 40, 67–82. [Google Scholar]
- Rekiel A., Więcek J., Batorska M., Kulisiewicz J. Effect of sow prolificacy and nutrition on pre- and postnatal growth of progeny – a review. Annals Anim. Sci. 2014, 14, 3–15. [CrossRef]
- Perry J.S., Rowell J.G. Variations in fetal weight and vascular supply along the uterine horn of the pig. J. Reprod. Fertil. 1969, 19 (3), 527–534. 3). [CrossRef]
- Widdowson, E.M. Intra-uterine growth retardation in the pig. I. Organ size and cellular development at birth and after growth to maturity. Biol. Neonate 1971, 19, 329–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gondret F., Lefaucheur L., Louveau I., Lebret B. The long-term influence of birth weight on muscle characteristics and eating meat quality in pigs individually reared and fed during fattening. Archiv für Tierzucht 2005, 48, 68–73. [Google Scholar]
- Rekiel A., Bartosik J., Więcek J., Batorska M., Kuczyńska B., Łojek A. Effect of piglet birth weight on selected characteristics of pork. Annals Anim. Sci. 2014, 14, 967–975. [CrossRef]
- DLG. DLG- Futterwerttabellen Schweine. 2014, 7. Auflage 2014, DLG-Verlag, Frankfurt am Main. In .
- AOAC. Official methods of analysis of AOAC International. 2000, (17th ed.), Gaithersburg, MD, USA.
- Dahlquist, A. Assay of intestinal disaccharidases. Scand. J. Clinic. Labor. Investigation 1964, 44, 169–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maroux S., Louvard D., Baratti J. The aminopeptidase from hog intestinal brush border. Biochim. Biophysica Acta 1973, 321, 282–295. [CrossRef]
- Matyba P., Florowski T., Dasiewicz K., Ferenc K., Olszewski J., Trela M., Galemba G., Słowiński M., Sady M., Domańska D.; Gajewski Z., Zabielski Z. Performance and Meat Quality of Intrauterine Growth Restricted Pigs. Animals 2021, 11, 254. [CrossRef]
- Feldpausch J.A., Jourquin J., Bergstrom J.R., Bargen J.L., Bokenkroger C.D., Davis D.L., Gonzalez J.M., Nelssen J.L., Puls Ch.L., Trout W.E., Ritter M.J. Birth weight threshold for identifying piglets at risk for preweaning mortality. Transl. Anim. Sci. 2019, 3, 633–640. [CrossRef]
- Pandolfi F., Edwards S.A., Robert F., Kyriazakis I. Risk factors associated with the different causes of piglet perinatal mortality in French farms. Prevent. Vet. Med. 2017, 137: 1-12. [CrossRef]
- Koketsu Y., Iida R., Piñeiro C. A 10-year trend in piglet pre-weaning mortality in breeding herds associated with sow herd size and number of piglets born alive. Porcine Health Management 2021, 7. [CrossRef]
- Riddersholm K.V., Bahnsen I., Bruun T.S., de Knegt L.V. Amdi C. Identifying Risk Factors for Low Piglet Birth Weight, High Within-Litter Variation and Occurrence of Intrauterine Growth-Restricted Piglets in Hyperprolific Sows. Animals 2021, 11, 2731. [CrossRef]
- Bee, G. Effect of early gestation feeding, birth weight, and sex of progeny muscle fiber characteristics of pigs at slaughter. J. Anim. Sci. 2004, 82, 826–836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wang T., Huo Y.J., Shi F.X., Xu R.J., Hutz R.J. Effects of intrauterine growth retardation on development of the gastrointestinal tract in neonatal pigs. Biol. Neonate 2005, 88, 66–72. [CrossRef]
- Greenwood P.L., Hunt A.S., Hermanson J.W., Bell A.,W. Effects of birth weight and postnatal nutrition on neonatal sheep. II. Skeletal muscle growth and development. J. Anim. Sci. 2000, 78, 50–61. [CrossRef]
- Wu G., Bazer F.W., Cudd T.A., Meininger C.J., Spencer T.E. Maternal nutrition and fetal development. J. Nutr. 2004, 134, 2169–2172. [CrossRef]
- Wolter B.F., Ellis M., Corrigan B.P., Dedecker J.M. The effect of birth weight and feeding of supplemental milk replacer to piglets during lactation on pre-weaning and post-weaning growth performance and carcass characteristics. J. Animal Sci. 2002, 80, 301–308. [CrossRef]
- Słupecka M., Woliński J., Prykhodko O., Ochniewicz P., Gruijc D., Fedkiv O., Weström B.R., Pierzynowski S.G. Stimulating effect of pancreatic-like enzymes on the development of the gastrointestinal tract in piglets. J. Anim. Sci. 2012, 90, 311–314. [CrossRef]
- Amdi C., Krogh U., Flummer C., Oksbjerg N., Hansen C.F., Theil P.K. Intrauterine growth restricted piglets defined by their head shape ingest insufficient amounts of colostrum. J. Anim. Sci. 2013, 91, 5605–5613. [CrossRef]
- Ferenc K., Pilżys T., Skrzypek T., Garbicz D., Marcinkowski M., Dylewska M., Gładysz P., Skorobogatov O., Gajewski Z., Grzesiuk E., Zabielski R. Structure and Function of Enterocyte in Intrauterine Growth Retarded Pig Neonates. Disease Markers 2017, ID: 5238134. [CrossRef]
- Marion J., Petersen Y.M., Rome V., Thomas F., Pe Sangild P.T., Le Dividich J., Le Huërou I. (2005). Early Weaning Stimulates Intestinal Brush Border Enzyme Activities in Piglets, Mainly at the Posttranscriptional Level. J. Pediat. Gastroenterol. Nutr. 2005, 41, 401–410. [CrossRef]
- Hampson D.J., Kidder D.E. Influence of creep feeding and weaning on brush border enzyme activities in the piglet small intestine. Res. Vet. Sci. 1986, 40, 24–31. [CrossRef]
- Pluske J.R., Kerton D.K., Cranwell P.D., Campbell R.G., Mullan B.P., King R.H., Power G.N., Pierzynowski S.G., Westrom B., Rippe C., Peulen O., Dunshea F.R. Age, sex, and weight at weaning influence organ weight and gastrointestinal development of weanling pigs. Austral. J. Agric. Res. 2003, 54, 515-527. [CrossRef]
- Hedemann M.S., Dybkjær L., Jensen B.B. Pre-weaning eating activity and morphological parameters in the small and large intestine of piglets. Livest. Prod. Sci. 2007, 108, 128–131. [CrossRef]
- Casanueva, F.F. and Dieguez C. Leptin and Ghrelin: What is the Impact on Pituitary Function? Rev. Endoc. & Metabol. Disorders 2005, 39–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kotunia A., Zabielski R. Ghrelin in the postnatal development of the gastrointestinal tract. J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 2006, 57, 97–111. [Google Scholar]
- Xiong L., You J., Zhang W., Zhu Q., Blachier F., Yin Y., Kong X. Intrauterine growth restriction alters growth performance, plasma hormones and small intestinal microbial communities in growing-finishing pigs. J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol. 2020, 11(1), 86. [CrossRef]
- Chen L., Mao X., Han F., Yu B., He J., Zheng P., Yu J., Luo J., Chen D. The effect of high nutrient on the growth performance, adipose deposition and gene expression of lipid metabolism in the neonatal intrauterine growth-retarded piglets. J. Appl. Anim. Res. 2017, 45, 39-44. [CrossRef]



| Specification | Nutritional group | |||
| NC | PC* | D1 | D2 | |
| Administration period (days) | 0 | 0 | 1–114 | 80–114 |
| Dose, IU/kg b.w. | ||||
| Lipase | 0 | 0 | 1000 | 1000 |
| Protease | 0 | 0 | 1350 | 1350 |
| Amylase | 0 | 0 | 4000 | 4000 |
| Mixture composition | Type of feed mixture | ||
| Unit | Sows in early gestation | Sows in late gestation | |
| Barley meal Oatmeal Triticale meal Wheat meal Wheat bran Pszenmix Dried grasses Soybean meal Forage chalk Monocalcium phosphate Feed salt L-lysine Mineral and vitamin premix Rapeseed oil Binder |
% % % % % % % % % % % % % % % |
30.00 26.00 19.00 - 15.69 - 2.00 4.00 1.00 0.50 0.40 0.11 0.50 0.50 0.30 100.00 |
25.0 - 20.00 20.00 - 3.31 - 14.00 0.70 0.70 0.45 0.33 0.50 0.50 - 100.00 |
| Nutrient content in 1-kg DM | |||
| Metabolic energy Crude fiber Crude protein Lysine Methionine + cystine Threonine Tryptophan Calcium Phosphorus Sodium |
MJ g g g g g g g g g |
11.5 70 129 6.0 4.6 4.2 1.6 6.0 5.7 1.9 |
13.1 162 33 9.4 5.7 6.1 1.9 7.5 5.5 2.0 |
| Mixture composition | Unit | Type of feed mixture | |||
| Super prestarter | Weaning prestarter | Starter | |||
| Barley meal | % | 13.06 | 40.00 | 40.00 | |
| Wheat meal | % | 30.00 | 20.00 | 22.00 | |
| Corn meal | % | 20.00 | 10.00 | 10.00 | |
| Soybean meal | % | 5.00 | - | 17.00 | |
| HP 300 | % | 10.00 | 14.00 | - | |
| Skimmed milk powder | % | 16.00 | 7.00 | 4.00 | |
| Pszenmix | % | - | 3.55 | 4.00 | |
| Bergafat | % | - | 2.00 | 1.00 | |
| Calcium formate | % | 1.50 | 1.20 | - | |
| Phosphate 1-Ca | % | 0.70 | 0.80 | 0.80 | |
| Feed salt | % | 0.26 | 0.30 | 0.40 | |
| L-lysine | % | 0.31 | 0.40 | 0.45 | |
| DL-methionine | % | 0.02 | 0.05 | 0.08 | |
| L-threonine | % | 0.07 | 0.13 | 0.14 | |
| L-tryptophan | % | 0.03 | 0.03 | - | |
| Probiotic preparation | % | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.06 | |
| PP | % | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.50 | |
| Plant oil | % | 2.50 | - | 0.5 | |
| 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | |||
| Nutrient content in 1 kg DM | |||||
| Metabolic energy | MJ | 13.9 | 13.5 | 13.2 | |
| Crude fiber | g | 26 | 30 | 37 | |
| Crude protein | g | 212 | 189 | 182 | |
| Lysine | g | 13.5 | 12.5 | 11.9 | |
| Methionine + cystine | g | 7.18 | 6.6 | 6.5 | |
| Threonine | g | 8.52 | 8.0 | 7.6 | |
| Tryptophan | g | 2.76 | 2.5 | 2.2 | |
| Calcium | g | 8.66 | 7.6 | 7.6 | |
| Phosphorus | g | 5.92 | 6.5 | 6.0 | |
| Sodium | g | 1.50 | 1.6 | 2.0 | |
| Specification | Nutritional group | |||
| NC | PC | D1 | D2 | |
| Surface area of pancreatic follicles (mm2) | 692 ± 201A | 788 ± 190B | 890 ± 261B | 855 ± 223B |
| Number of follicular cells per pancreatic follicle | 9.4 ± 2.2b | 8.5 ± 2.0a | 8.1 ± 2.1a | 8.7 ± 2.0ab |
| Pancreatic cell surface area (mm2) | 72 ± 19A | 84 ± 18B | 89 ± 16B | 87 ± 22B |
| Specification | Nutritional group | |||
| NC | PC | D1 | D2 | |
| Mucosa thickness (µm) | 589 ± 71A | 655 ± 80AB | 580 ± 68A | 669 ± 85B |
| Muscle membrane thickness (µm) | 1774 ± 227a | 1852 ± 246ab | 1800 ±204a | 1926 ±258b |
| Specification | Nutritional group | |||
| NC | PC | D1 | D2 | |
| Length of villi (µm) | 234 ± 38 | 238 ± 28 | 228 ± 31 | 226 ± 26 |
| Depth of crypts (µm) | 104 ± 12A | 122 ± 16B | 102 ± 14A | 116 ± 12AB |
| Mucosa membrane thickness (µm) | 483 ± 51a | 506 ± 48b | 488 ± 57a | 497 ± 75b |
| Muscle membrane thickness (µm) | 142 ± 21A | 152 ± 20B | 140 ± 22A | 149 ± 18B |
| Specification | Nutritional group | |||
| NC | PC | D1 | D2 | |
| Initial section of small intestine | ||||
| Length of villi (µm) | 272 ± 49 | 287 ± 33 | 277 ± 31 | 268 ± 32 |
| Depth of crypts (µm) | 101 ± 8 | 107 ± 8 | 108 ± 7 | 109 ± 7 |
| Mucosa membrane thickness (µm) | 540 ± 61A | 596 ± 53B | 555 ± 48A | 591 ± 55B |
| Muscle membrane thickness (µm) | 110 ± 15A | 130 ± 20BC | 117 ± 25A | 139 ± 23B |
| Middle section of small intestine | ||||
| Length of villi (µm) Depth of crypts (µm) Mucosa membrane thickness (µm) Muscle membrane thickness (µm) |
312 ± 35 | 320 ± 33 | 310 ± 34 | 321 ± 38 |
| 103 ± 4aA | 118 ± 5b | 106 ± 8a | 122 ± 5b | |
| 416 ± 37A | 434 ± 35AB | 422 ± 38A | 440 ± 39B | |
| 112 ± 18A | 124 ± 15AB | 114 ± 19A | 127 ± 20B | |
| Terminal section of small intestine | ||||
| Length of villi (µm) | 330 ± 36 | 334 ± 36 | 326 ± 33 | 333 ± 30 |
| Depth of crypts (µm) | 102 ± 5A | 116 ± 5AB | 107 ± 7A | 124 ± 6B |
| Mucosa membrane thickness (µm) | 442 ± 46A | 472 ± 46Ab | 450 ± 50A | 482 ± 49B |
| Muscle membrane thickness (µm) | 119 ± 22A | 126 ± 22AB | 122 ± 19A | 128 ± 20B |
| Specification | Nutritional group | |||
| NC | PC | D1 | D2 | |
| Length of villi (µm) | 483±30 | 450±34 | 440±39 | 436±38 |
| Depth of crypts (µm) | 106±7A | 118±8B | 104±7A | 116±9B |
| Mucosa membrane thickness (µm) | 487±55A | 526±54B | 490±54A | 516±56B |
| Mucosa membrane thickness (µm) | 113±11A | 134±14B | 114±13B | 126±12B |
| Enzyme | Jejunum part | Nutritional group | |||
| NC | PC | D1 | D2 | ||
| Saccharase | Prox | 0.50±0.17 | 0.50±0.13 | 0.68±0.11 | 1.36±046 |
| Mid | 0.68±0.11 | 0.68±0.11 | 0.47±0.16 | 0.55±0.08 | |
| Dist | 0.06±0.01 | 0.16±0.01 | 0.15±0.08 | 0.20±0.08 | |
| Lactase | Prox | 21.80±3.27A | 29.60±3.2B | 32.90±3.99B | 30.00±6.83B |
| Mid | 18.6±2.99 | 19.20±2.10 | 17.20±5.82 | 20.00±4.35 | |
| Dist | 10.40±3.43 | 8.15±2.88 | 6.60±1.05 | 9.62±3.87 | |
| Maltase | Prox | 6.23±1.49 | 6.23±1.51 | 6.09±3.99 | 6.76±3.63 |
| Mid | 4.05±1.44 | 5.44±1.62 | 5.10±2.69 | 5.27±1.59 | |
| Dist | 2.35±0.48 | 3.38±0.69 | 3.21±0.95 | 3.59±1.46 | |
| Dipeptidylpeptidase IV | Prox | 1.53±0.98 | 1.70±0.87 | 1.37±0.68 | 2.16±1.05 |
| Mid | 1.54±1.14 | 2.22±1.13 | 2.15±1.77 | 2.47±1.50 | |
| Dist | 3.74±2.20 | 2.80±1.06 | 2.99±1.18 | 2.87±1.04 | |
| Aminopeptidase N | Prox | 5.81±2.98 | 5.98±2.28 | 8.94±2.39 | 6.07±2.46 |
| Mid | 5.27±1.35 | 5.10±1.32 | 5.16±1.97 | 5.15±1.18 | |
| Dist | 5.69±2.99 | 6.12±2.23 | 6.23±2.30 | 6.20±2.28 | |
| Aminopeptidase A | Prox | 6.88±2.37 | 7.58±2.87 | 7.51±3.11 | 7.64±2.41 |
| Mid | 5.45±1.46 | 6.88±1.98 | 5.79±2.44 | 7.51±2.19 | |
| Dist | 3.83±0.76 | 4.21±1.01 | 4.06±1.18 | 4.40±1.30 | |
| Indices | Nutritional group | |||
| NC | PC | D1 | D2 | |
| Immunoglobulin IgA | 0.08±0.01 | 0.09±0.02 | 0.90±0.01 | 0.90±0.02 |
| Haptoglobin | 0.42±0.20B | 0.18±0.15A | 0.38±0.20B | 0.20±0.13A |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).