Lignin-Based ILs as Corrosion Inhibitors

1. Introduction

Corrosion is a natural process that takes place whenever a metal is exposed to the environment, leading to its oxidation and degradation over time. Due to both economical and safety concerns caused by corrosion, there are several strategies that can be adopted to mitigate the problem [1]. Among these strategies, corrosion inhibitors are one of the easiest and most efficient ways to guarantee a good protection of a metal surface, such as mild steel, from corrosion [2]. Due to increasing awareness for the environmental problems linked to the use of chromate-based inhibitors, the so-called “green corrosion inhibitors”, a class of organic compounds derived from natural sources, have emerged as an interesting approach to the problem of finding effective corrosion inhibitors that are non-toxic and environmentally friendly [3]. Unlike traditional inhibitors, green corrosion inhibitors are derived from natural sources including plant extracts, biomass, and agricultural industry waste.

Plant extracts, natural polymers, and ionic liquids are among the most common sources of green inhibitors that have received significant research attention in recent years [4]. Plant extracts present the great advantage of deriving from a natural source through an easy and low-cost extraction, and often can be recuperated from agricultural or agro- wastes [3]. On the other hand, ionic liquids offer attractive properties such as easy synthesis and negligible vapor pressure which allow them to be recognized as a greener and safer alternative to volatile organic solvents [5]. In the context of environmental sustainability, the synthesis of ionic liquids from building blocks of natural origin is an imperative demand. In the last few years, a large number of natural compounds derived from sugars have been used for the preparation of Ils [6]. In contrast, natural products derived from natural polymers such as lignine remain an underexploited option. Therefore, the preparation of lignin-based ILs represents an interesting challenge that opens up new possibilities for developing next-generation ILs. Plant derived polyphenols possess the ability to donate hydrogen atoms, which allows them to scavenge free radicals and inhibit oxidative stress, and for this reason they have been recently investigated in the synthesis of natural deep eutectics solvents as corrosion protectors [7]. It is known from literature that molecules containing unshared electron pairs and double bonds can mitigate corrosion by forming a protective layer on the metal’s surface [8,9]. Based on structurally related carboxylic derivatives of lignin, such as gallic, syringic and vanillic acids, three different types of ILs, two aprotic and one protic, were selected for their promising structure, suitable for anticorrosion testing and prepared to be tested as potential corrosion inhibitors.

Amine-based compounds are widely used in the fields of corrosion protection [10]. For this reason, a very common imidazole-type cation and the bio-based choline cation were selected for the two classes of aprotic ILs. Fully bio-based ionic liquids can be obtained with the latter combination. Choline-based ionic liquids with gallate, syringate and vanillate anions were previously prepared and used mainly as hydrotropes [11,12]. However, to the best of our knowledge, these compounds were not used as antioxidant additives to date. For the case of protic ILs, the well-studied DBU cation was selected for their preparation.

While a few studies have explored the possible use of gallic acid as a corrosion inhibitor [13,14], syringic acid and vanillic acid, as far as we know, have never been investigated as potential corrosion inhibitors.

In this work, the three aforementioned lignine derivative acids have been incorporated into different ILs, as shown in Figure 1. These new ILs present the advantage of being halogen and acid free, having tunable solubility and the ability to suppress condensation reactions. Furthermore, the synthetic methods applied were based on previously optimized procedures aimed at reducing their environmental footprint.

This portfolio of prepared ILs allows a comprehensive insight into the contribution of cations and diverse anions to the corrosion inhibition properties of these structurally related ILs families. All compounds were characterized by ¹H and ¹³C NMR and their thermal properties were investigated. The anticorrosion properties were electrochemically investigated in aqueous solution of sodium chloride using mild steel as working electrode. In order to have a more comprehensive understanding of their inhibition effects, the surfaces of mild steel after 24 h of immersion were studied by SEM, EDS and optical profilometry.

2. Results and discussion

2.1. Thermal characterization

The thermal properties of the synthesized ILs were evaluated in terms of thermal stability and thermal behavior. To investigate the short-term thermal stability, thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) was carried out. This technique has been widely used to compare the thermal stability of ILs, as it permits the acquisition of data in a short time. Based on the thermogravimetric data of 66 ILs, Cao and Mu [15] identified 5 different levels of thermal stability, ranging from the least stable to the most stable. The lignin-based ILs were analyzed under the same conditions and the results are shown in Table 1, with the TG curves in the Supporting Information. Three different temperatures were identified for each IL, T_start, T_onset and T_peak.

The analysis of the T_onsets shows that all the ILs prepared belong to the least stable class. This result is in line with what was reported for the majority of ILs with a carboxylate anion. Comparing ILs with the same anion, no evident differences in stability are observed by varying the cationic portion. The sole exception is represented by [Emim]Van, which showed a significantly lower T_start within the same series. Considering instead the T_start of ILs with different types of anions, keeping the cation unchanged, a slightly lower stability of syringate-based ILs is observed compared to gallate and vanillate, again with the exception of [Emim]Van. Further analysis of the degradation profiles shows a marked difference between the gallate-based ILs compared to syringate and vanillate. The gallate-based ILs are in fact the only ones that show two distinct degradation events, with the cation which seems to play a prominent role in promoting different degradation mechanism of the ILs. For example, in the case of the choline cation, even a third degradation event is noticeable between the two main ones. However, further studies are needed to confirm and clarify the degradation mechanism of these ILs.

Figure 2. Thermal gravimetric curves (left side) and derivatives (right side) of lignin-based ILs. [Emim] (red lines), [Chol] (blue lines), and [DBU] (green lines).

Figure 2. Thermal gravimetric curves (left side) and derivatives (right side) of lignin-based ILs. [Emim] (red lines), [Chol] (blue lines), and [DBU] (green lines).

Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) was used to evaluate the thermal behaviour of lignin-based ILs, and the data are reported in Table 1 (thermographs are available in Supporting Information). Apart from [Emim]Van, all compounds were found to be solid at room temperature. A decrease in the melting point in the order [Emim]Gal> [Emim]Syr> [Emim]Van was observed in the series of ILs with the [Emim] cation. In fact, [Emim]Gal decomposes before melting, [Emim]Syr melts at 148.0 °C, while [Emim]Van is liquid at room temperature and only displays a glass transition at -1.17 °C. The reverse trend of melting decrease is observed for the series with the [Chol] cation, namely [Chol]Van> [Chol]Syr> [Chol]Gal. In this case, [Chol]Van melts close to the degradation temperature while [Chol]Syr and [Chol]Gal melt at 157.4 and 135.8 °C, respectively. It is also worth stressing that [Chol]Syr and [Chol]Gal showed the tendency to form undercooled liquids. In fact, a glass transition at 18.63 and 22.29 °C was observed for [Chol]Syr and [Chol]Gal respectively during successive heating/cooling cycles. Finally, none of the ILs of the series with the [DBU] cation melt before degrading. Only for [DBU]Gal a solid-solid transition was observed at 76.37 °C.

2.2. Electrochemical characterization

Every inhibitor was electrochemically tested through PEIS and CPP at a concentration of 5 mM to evaluate their anti-corrosion properties at a low concentration. From these preliminary results some were selected for testing at higher concentration (10 ppm) and immersed corrosion samples further characterized through surface analysis. As is shown in Figure S1, the inhibitors containing vanillate as an anion, and DBU as a cation demonstrated very low impedance and consequently poor protection against corrosion. For this reason, these inhibitors were not further investigated, thus leaving 4 ILs to be further investigated.

2.2.1. Potentiostatic Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy (PEIS)

The impedance spectra of the samples exposed to a 0.01 M NaCl aqueous solution for 24 h with and without inhibitor were measured by PEIS, with Bode and Phase angle plots shown in Figure 3. After 24h of immersion, the mild steel control presents an impedance of 1760 Ω and a peak angle of -30^° in the lower frequency range (10^-1-10¹ Hz). For the solutions containing the inhibitors at the concentrations of 3, 5 and 10 mM, the plots for the Emim ILs show that the gallate does not seem to significantly improve the impedance, even at higher concentration, while on the other hand with the syringate there is an increase in the impedance with concentration. [Emim]Syr at 10 mM causes an increase in the total impedance of almost one order of magnitude (from 1700 to 14000 Ω) with respect to the control. Regarding the phase angle, there is a shift towards more positive frequencies with the gallate anion, and the increase of the concentration causes an increase of the angle up to 40^° for a concentration of 10 mM. With the syringate anion, in the phase angle data, it is still possible to observe that an increase of the concentration leads to both a shift towards more positive frequencies and to an increment of the phase angle up to 40^° that can be correlated with the formation of the inhibitor film.

For the inhibitors containing choline as a cation, the effect of the gallate and syringate anions are similar to that for the Emim, but in this case the syringate anion causes an increase in the impedance, from 1700 Ω for the control to 34000 Ω with 10 mM [Chol]Syr, with it displaying an almost straight line until high frequencies. When gallate is used with choline or Emim, both the impedance spectra show little variation with concentration.

Interestingly, the Phase angle of [Chol]Syr shows an additional peak at higher frequencies, meaning that probably there are two electrochemical processes happening on the surface of the steel. The two processes can be attributed to the corrosion process for the higher peak and to the inhibitor film for the peak at higher frequencies. This is consistent with the literature [16], where it is suggested that the shift towards more high frequencies in the Phase angle of dielectric films is caused by their small time constant.

2.2.2. Cyclic Potentiodynamin Polarization (CPP)

To further investigate the inhibitor behavior of the ILs, Cyclic Potentiodynamic Polarization scans of AS1020 mild steel samples after 24 h of exposure in the control solution (0.01 M NaCl) and inhibited solution (0.01 M NaCl + inhibitor at different concentrations) were performed and the resulting curves are shown in Figure 4. Corrosion potential (E_corr), corrosion current density (i_corr) and inhibitor efficiency calculated using Tafel extrapolation are reported in Table 2.

The two lignine anions show distinct behaviours; when steel is immersed in the solution containing gallate, the E_corr presents a shift towards more negative potential in respect to the control (dotted line), while with the syringate there is a shift to more positive potential. A small decrease in the cathodic branch can be observed for [Emim]Gal and [Chol]Gal, with a decrease in the corrosion current significantly smaller than for [Emim]Syr and [Chol]Syr at 10mM.

At a concentration of 10 mM, [Emim]Syr presents a shift towards less anodic potential with respect to the concentration of 3 and 5 mM, with a significant decrease in the anodic branch and in the corrosion current which decrease from 1.457 µA/cm² to 0.312 µA/cm² with respect to the control. On the other hand, [Chol]Syr shows the greatest reduction in the corrosion current (from 1.457 µA/cm² to 0.066 µA/cm²) and the highest efficiency at 10 mM.

From these plots, it seems that the syringate anion leads to an inhibitor with more of an anodic effect and presents the highest inhibitor efficiency at 10 mM.

2.3. Surface characterization

Since the concentration of 10 mM showed the greatest reduction in corrosion rate from the electrochemistry, the surfaces were characterized at this concentration.

The surface of AS1020 mild steel after 24 h of immersion in control and inhibited solutions were studied by optical microscopy, scanning electron microscopy and optical profilometer. In Figure 5 and Figure 6, optical images and SEM micrographs show how a different anion can affect the surface of the sample. More in detail, the optical microscope images in Figure 5 shows a uniformly corroded surface in the case of [Emim]Gal and [Chol]Gal, while is possible to see some pits in [Emim]Syr and [Chol]Syr.

The microscope images are consistent with the CPP plots, where the presence of a few pits in the sample immersed in solutions containing syringate as anion and uniform corrosion in the sample immersed in solutions containing gallate as anion confirm the anodic and cathodic behavior of the respective ILs.

From the SEM, both the surfaces of [Emim]Gal and of [Chol]Gal appear to be clean, without any deep pits or deposit of corrosion products, but uniformly etched. It’s known from literature that Gallic acid forms binary and ternary complexes with iron (III) in aqueous solutions, which leads to the formation of a solid dark precipitate[17]. Since the surface is clean, it seems that this complex does not provide any type of protection.

The EDS in Figure S2 shows that the surface of [Emim]Gal is mainly characterized by iron and oxygen with a small percentage of carbon (not higher than the percentage of carbon found in the control), while the surface of [Chol]Gal in Figure S3 shows the same kind of corrosion, with some deposit on the surface that could be attributed to the cation choline from the higher percentage of carbon. In the case of [Emim]Gal, since no sign of the inhibitor has been found on the surface, it seems that the complex does not interact with the steel surface and does not form any protective layer. The use of [Chol] instead of [Emim] as cation does not influence the aspect of the surface as dramatically as the anion, but it seems that choline could better interact with the steel surface and inhibit the corrosion process, in accordance with the electrochemistry.

The use of syringate instead of gallate for both emim and choline leads to the formation of deposits on the surface, which are smaller for [Chol]Syr than for [Emim]Syr, meaning the inhibitor [Chol]Syr may shut down the corrosion reaction faster. The EDS in Figure S4 for [Emim]Syr shows a high percentage of carbon on the surface, that can be attributed to the inhibitor. In the case of [Chol]Syr, the surface was clean for most of the sample, but with some pits. For this reason, four different areas were analyzed by EDS in Figure S5 to better understand the nature of the deposits. Area number 1 is used as reference, since it appears to be clean and with no evident signs of corrosion. Area numbers 2 and 3 present a significant decrease in the iron percentage and an increase in the carbon amount (36% and 45% respectively). Every area shows the presence of nitrogen, especially area 2 (5.3%) and 3 (4.2%): the presence of carbon and nitrogen can be considered as clear proof of the presence of the inhibitor and confirms the presence of the choline cation that contains nitrogen in its structure. Moreover, the percentage of oxygen goes from 1% in area 1 to 24.3% and 25.6% in areas 2 and 3. This increase may be due to two reasons: the presence of iron oxides as corrosion products, not supported by the decrease in the iron percentage, or the presence of the inhibitor (characterized by hydroxyl groups and a carboxylic moiety) on the surface of the metal, forming a protective precipitate on the surface.

According to the electrochemistry and SEM micrographs, the roughness of the surface of the samples calculated through optical profilometry and reported in Table S1 showed that [Chol]Syr was able to inhibit the corrosion process and protect the surface during the 24 h of immersion, resulting in an overall roughness close to the pristine steel (S_a of 0.109 um for [Chol]Syr vs 0.101 um for control). [Chol]Gal presented quite a smooth surface, with a S_a of 0.161 um, while [Emim]Syr and [Emim]Gal presented a S_a of 0.241 and 0.273 respectively.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Materials

1,8-Diazabicyclo[5.4.0]undec-7-ene 99% (DBU), was obtained from Alfa Aesar, Thermo Fisher. Choline hydroxide 98% (ChOH), gallic acid >98.0%, vanillic acid >98.0%, and syringic acid >97.0% were purchased by TCI Chemicals. 1-Ethyl-3-methylimidazolium methylcarbonate [Emim MeCO₃] (98%) methanol solutions were obtained from Proionic GmbH. Mild Steel AS1020, NaCl (>99.5% w/t), MiliQ water were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Merck Life Science). All the employed reagents and solvents were used without further purification where not differently mentioned.

3.2. Synthetic pathways

The three different classes of lignin-derived ILs were prepared using methods previously optimized for similar compounds.

3.2.1. General procedure for the synthesis of imidazolium lignin-based ILs

The imidazolium-based ILs were synthesized from a methyl carbonate precursor in accordance with the procedure developed for carboxylated ILs by Mero et al. [18]. The proper phenolic acid (1 equiv.) was added to a commercially available methanolic solution of the methyl carbonate IL. The concentration of methylcarbonate IL in methanol solution was previously determined by volumetric titration using a standard 0.1 M HCl solution (Eutech pH meter, pH 700, calibrated with three standard buffer solutions at pH 4.01, 7.00 and 10.00). The resulting mixture was stirred for 2 h at room temperature and the reaction solvent was evaporated under reduced pressure at 45 °C for 3 h to recover the target compounds in quantitative yield. The structure of the compounds was confirmed by ¹H and ¹³C-NMR and the spectra are reported in the supporting information.

Fig_label. Synthetic steps for [Emim]Gal.

Fig_label. Synthetic steps for [Emim]Gal.

3-ethyl-1-methyl-1H-imidazol-3 ium gallate ([Emim]Gal).

The preparation of [Emim]Gal (99% yield, light yellow solid), whose synthetic pathway is showed in Fig-label, was performed according to the general procedure for imidazolium-based ILs. ¹H-NMR (400 MHz, MeOD) δ(ppm) s 8.78 (s, 1H, C(2)H imidazolium), 7.50 and 7.43 (2d, 2H, C(4-5)H imidazolium), 6.98 (s, 2H, 2X C(orto)H gallic), 4.15 (q, 2H, NCH₂CH₃ chain), 3.83 (s, 3H, NCH₃), 1.45 (t, 3H, NCH₂CH₃); ¹³C-NMR (100 MHz, MeOD) δ (ppm) 175.6 (COO^-, gallic), 146.1 (C-3 and C-5, gallic), 137.4 (C-4, gallic), 136.8 (C-2 imidaz), 129.6 (C-1, gallic), 124.8, 123.1 (C-4 and C-5, imidaz), 110.0 (C-2 and C-6, gallic), 45.94 (NCH₂ CH₃), 36.36 (NCH₃), 15.44 (NCH₂ CH₃).

3-ethyl-1-methyl-1H-imidazol-3-ium syringate ([Emim]Syr).

The preparation of [Emim]Syr (99% yield, brown solid) was performed according to the general procedure for imidazolium-based ILs. ¹H-NMR (400 MHz, MeOD) δ(ppm) s 8.92 (s, 1H, C(2)H imidazolium), 7.63 and 7.55 (2d, 2H, C(4-5)H imidazolium), 7.34 (s, 2H, 2 X C(orto)H syring), 4.24 (q, 2H, NCH₂CH₃ chain), 3.92 (s, 3H, NCH₃), 3.89 (s, 6H, 2X(OCH₃)), 1.53 (t, 3H, NCH₂CH₃); ¹³C-NMR (100 MHz, MeOD) δ (ppm) 175.3 (COO^-, syring), 148.7 (C-3 and C-5, syring), 140.23 (C-4, syring), 137.7 (C-2 imidaz), 128.9 (C-1, gallic), 124.9, 123.3 (C-4 and C-5, imidaz), 108.2 (C-2 and C-6, syring), 56.7 (2x (OCH₃), syring), 45.99 (NCH₂ CH₃), 36.38 (NCH₃), 15.52 (NCH₂ CH₃).

3-ethyl-1-methyl-1H-imidazol-3-ium vanillate ([Emim]Van).

The preparation of [Emim]Van (99% yield, brown liquid) was performed according to the general procedure for imidazolium-based ILs. ¹H-NMR (400 MHz, MeOD) δ(ppm) s 8.91 (s, 1H, C(2)H imidazolium), 7.60 and 7.53 (2d, 2H, C(4-5)H imidazolium), 7.59 (d, 1H, C(2)H van), 7.49 (dd, 1H, C(6)H van), 6.76 (d, 1H, C(5)H), 4.23 (q, 2H, NCH₂CH₃ chain), 3.90 (s, 3H, NCH₃), 3.89 (s, 3H, OCH₃), 1.51 (t, 3H, NCH₂CH₃); ¹³C-NMR (100 MHz, MeOD) δ (ppm) 175.4 (COO^-, van), 151.2 (C-4, van), 148.4 (C-3, van), 137.4 (C-2 imidaz), 130.1 (C-1, van), 124.8, 123.2 (C-4 and C-5, imidaz), 124.2 (C-6, van), 115.5 (C-5, van), 114.1 (C-2, van), 56.3 (OCH₃), syring), 45.94 (NCH₂ CH₃), 36.35 (NCH₃), 15.49 (NCH₂ CH₃).

3.2.2. General procedure for the synthesis of cholinium lignin-based ILs

Choline-based ILs have been prepared from a commercially available aqueous solution of choline hydroxide (ChOH). Choline hydroxide (ChOH) solution was titrated with aqueous HCl 1 M, giving the exact percentage of ionic liquid in water. An equimolar amount of the proper phenolic acid was added to the titrated solution and the mixture stirred for 1 h. Finally, the solvent was removed under vacuum at 60 °C for 8 h to obtain the corresponding reaction products, all of which were light yellow. The structure of the compounds was checked by ¹H and ¹³C-NMR and the spectra, reported in the supporting information, agreed with those reported in the literature [19].

Fig_label. Synthetic steps for Cholinum gallate [Chol]Gal.

Fig_label. Synthetic steps for Cholinum gallate [Chol]Gal.

The preparation of [Chol]Gal (99% yield, light yellow solid) was performed according to the general procedure for imidazolium-based ILs. ¹H NMR (400 MHz, MeOD): δ 7.05 (s, 2H, H-2 e H-6), 4.04-3.99 (m, 2H, NCH₂CH₂OH), 3.50 – 3.46 (m, 2H, NCH₂CH₂OH), 3.20 (s, 9H, N(CH₃)₃)). ¹³C NMR (100 MHz, MeOD) δ 175.4 (s, COO), 145.6 (C-3 e C-5), 136.9 (C-4), 129.5 (C-1), 110.2 (C-2 e C-6), 68.91 (NCH₂CH₂OH), 56.89 (NCH₂CH₂OH), 54.91, 54.87, 54.84 (N(CH₃)₃). ¹H NMR and ¹³C NMR data agree with those reported in literature[20].

Trimethyl-β-hydroxyethyl-ammonium syringate ([Chol]Syr)

The preparation of [Chol]Syr (99% yield, light yellow solid) was performed according to the general procedure for imidazolium-based ILs. ¹H NMR (400 MHz, MeOD): δ 7.35 (d, 2H, H-2 and H-6), 4.01-3.97 (m, 2H, NCH₂CH₂OH), 3.89 (s, 6H, 2x(OCH₃)), 3.49 – 3.44 (m, 2H, NCH₂CH₂OH), 3.19 (s, 9H, N(CH₃)₃)). ¹³C NMR (100 MHz, MeOD) δ 175.1 (COO), 148.4 (COH-4), 139.2 (2x (COCH₃)), 129.6 (CCOO-1), 108.1 (C-6), 69.05 (NCH₂CH₂OH), 57.04 (NCH₂CH₂OH), 56.69 (2x(OCH₃)), 54.70, 54.67, 54.63 (N(CH₃)₃). ¹H NMR and ¹³C NMR data AGREEwith those reported in literature[19].

Trimethyl-β-hydroxyethyl-ammoniumvanillate ([Chol]Van)

The preparation of [Chol]Van (99% yield, light yellow solid) was performed according to the general procedure for imidazolium-based ILs. ¹H NMR (400 MHz, MeOD): δ 7.61 (d, 1H, H-2), 7.50 (dd, 1H, H-6), 6.79 (d, 1H, H-5), 4.01 – 3.96 (m, 2H, NCH₂CH₂OH), 3.90 (s, 3H, OCH₃), 3.48-3.44 (m, 2H, NCH₂CH₂OH), 3.19 (s, 9H, N(CH₃)₃). ¹³C NMR (100 MHz, MeOD) δ 175.3 (COO), 150.28 (COH-4), 148.1 (COCH₃-3), 130.7 (CCOOH), 124.2 (C-6), 115.30 (C-5), 114.1 (C-2), 69.04 (NCH₂CH₂OH), 57.02 (NCH₂CH₂OH), 56.32 (OCH₃), 54.69, 54.66, 54.62 (N(CH₃)₃). ¹H NMR and ¹³C NMR data agree with those reported in literature [20].

3.2.3. General procedure for the synthesis of protic lignin-based ILs

An equimolar amount of phenolic acid was added to 1,5-diazabicyclo[5.4.0]undec-7-ene [DBU] at 0 °C without the addition of solvent. The reaction was mixed at 0 °C for 5 minutes and then the mixture was returned to room temperature. The structure of the compounds was confirmed by ¹H and ¹³C-NMR and the spectra are reported in the supporting information.

Fig_label. Synthetic steps for [DBU]Gal.

Fig_label. Synthetic steps for [DBU]Gal.

1,5-diazabicyclo[5.4.0]undec-7-eneium gallate ([DBU]Gal).

The preparation of [DBU]Gal (99% yield, light yellow solid) was performed according to the general procedure for imidazolium-based ILs. ¹H NMR (400 MHz, MeOD): δ 7.03 (s, 2H, H-2 e H-6), 3.58–3.53 (m, 2H, H-6 DBU), 3.50 (t, 2H, H-4 DBU), 3.32 (t, 2H, H-2 DBU) 2.66–2.61 (m, 2H, H-10 DBU), 2.00 (sept, 2H, H-2 DBU) 1.81–1.61 (m, 6H, H-7,8,9 DBU). ¹³C NMR (100 MHz, MeOD) δ 175.4 (COO), 167.5 (N-C=N), 145.9 (C-3 e C-5), 137.8 (C-4), 129.6 (C-1), 110.1 (C-2 e C-6), 55.37 (C-6 DBU), 49.54 (C-4 DBU), 39.34 (C-2 DBU), 33.70 (C-10 DBU), 29.91 (C-7 DBU), 27.45 (C-8 DBU), 24.91 (C-9 DBU), 20.41 (C-3 DBU).

1,5-diazabicyclo[5.4.0]undec-7-eneium syringate ([DBU]Syr).

The preparation of [DBU]Syr (99% yield, light yellow solid) was performed according to the general procedure for imidazolium-based ILs. ¹H NMR (400 MHz, MeOD): δ 7.35 (s, 2H, H-2 e H-6), 3.89 (s, 3H, OCH₃), 3.61–3.54 (m, 2H, H-6 DBU), 3.52 (t, 2H, H-4 DBU), 3.34 (t, 2H, H-2 DBU) 2.70–2.613 (m, 2H, H-10 DBU), 2.02 (sept, 2H, H-2 DBU) 1.83–1.64 (m, 6H, H-7,8,9 DBU). ¹³C NMR (100 MHz, MeOD) δ 175.1 (COO), 167.5 (N-C=N), 148.4 (C-3 e C-5), 139.1 (C-4), 129.7 (C-1), 108.1 (C-2 e C-6), 56.71 (2x(OCH₃)), 55.35 (C-6 DBU), 49.55 (C-4 DBU), 39.34 (C-2 DBU), 33.70 (C-10 DBU), 29.92 (C-7 DBU), 27.46 (C-8 DBU), 24.96 (C-9 DBU), 20.41 (C-3 DBU).

1,5-diazabicyclo[5.4.0]undec-7-eneium vanillate ([DBU]Van).

The preparation of [DBU]Van (99% yield, light yellow solid) was performed according to the general procedure for imidazolium-based ILs. 7.60 (d, 1H, H-2), 7.49 (dd, 1H, H-6), 6.77 (d, 1H, H-5), 3.90 (s, 3H, OCH₃), 3.60–3.55 (m, 2H, H-6 DBU), 3.51 (t, 2H, H-4 DBU), 3.33 (t, 2H, H-2 DBU) 2.69–2.63 (m, 2H, H-10 DBU), 2.01 (sept, 2H, H-2 DBU) 1.80–1.61 (m, 6H, H-7,8,9 DBU). ¹³C NMR (100 MHz, MeOD) δ 175.2 (COO), 167.5 (N-C=N), 150.0 (COH-4), 148.1 (COCH₃-3), 130.7 (CCOOH), 124.2 (C-6), 115.20 (C-5), 114.2 (C-2), 56.35 (2x(OCH₃)), 55.32 (C-6 DBU), 49.53 (C-4 DBU), 39.32 (C-2 DBU), 33.65 (C-10 DBU), 29.91 (C-7 DBU), 27.45 (C-8 DBU), 24.91 (C-9 DBU), 20.40 (C-3 DBU).

3.3. Characterization methods

3.3.1. Thermal Gravimetric Analysis (TGA)

The thermal stability of ILs was investigated by using thermal gravimetric analysis (TA Instruments Q500 TGA). The instrument was calibrated using weight standards (1 g and 100 mg, TA Instruments) and the temperature calibration was performed using nickel standard (TA Instruments). The ILs sample (10-15 mg) was heated at 40 °C in a platinum crucible for the drying procedure and maintained in N₂ flux (90 mL/min) for 30 min. Then, the samples were heated from 40 °C to 600 °C with a heating rate of 10 °C/min under nitrogen (90 mL/min) and maintained at 600 °C for 3 min. Mass change was recorded as a function of temperature and time. TGA experiments were carried out in duplicate.

3.3.2. Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC)

The thermal behaviour of LevILs was analysed using a differential scanning calorimeter (TA DSC, Q250, USA, temperature accuracy ± 0.05 C, temperature precision ± 0.008 C, enthalpy precision ± 0.08%). Dry high purity N₂ gas was flown through the sample at a flow rate of 50 mL/min. A weight of approximately 3 mg of each sample was placed in a hermetically sealed aluminum crucible with a pinhole and the phase behavior was studied under a nitrogen atmosphere in the temperature range from 90 to 120 °C at a heating rate of 10 °C/min. Temperature calibration was performed considering the heating rate dependence of the onset melting peak temperature of indium. The enthalpy was also calibrated using indium (melting enthalpy Δ_mH = 28.71 J g-1). DSC experiments were performed in duplicate. T_g was obtained by taking the midpoint of the heat capacity change on heating from a glass to a liquid. T_m was taken as the peak temperature of the endothermic peak on heating. Peak temperatures were chosen instead of onset temperatures because of the complexity of the thermograms.

3.3.2. PEIS and CPP

BioLogicVMP3 multichannel potentiostat and EC-Lab^® V11.42 software were used for PEIS and CPP experiments. The setup for the test was the following: a three-electrode cell where the counter electrode (CE) was graphite, and the working electrode (WE) was a rod of mild steel AS1020 with a surface of 1.1 cm² and equipped with an Ag/AgCl reference electrode. The working electrode was polished using polishing paper with three different grits: 240, 800, and 1200 to assure that all the samples have a comparable surface.

The inhibitor efficiency was extrapolated through Tafel plot according to Equation 1:

$$\eta =\frac{i_{corrcontrol-i_{corr\left(i\right)}}}{i_{corrcontrol}}$$

(1)

Since the curves can be considered linear in the range of 10-25 mV for either side, the extrapolations were made over this range for every sample, and they were calculated using the software Origin^© 2022b 9.9.

3.3.3. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and Energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS)

A JSM-IT300 LV SEM instrument equipped with an Oxford X-Max 50 mm² EDS detector at 15kV was used to obtain micrographs of the surfaces after immersion. The EDS detector was used with an accelerating voltage of 40 kV and the corresponding spectra were elaborated using the AZtec software by Oxford Instruments.

3.3.4. Optical microscope

A Leica MZ 7 optical microscope was used to observe surfaces of the samples after 24 hours of immersion, the images were elaborated through the software LAS V4.0.

3.3.5. Optical Profilometer

Three-dimension surface profilometry was performed on a Bruker Contour GT-K1 3D optical microscope on samples immersed for 24h in the respective solution that had the corrosion products removed. The corrosion products were removed following ASTM G1-03 (2011), chemical cleaning procedure Table 1.1 designation C.3.5. Every scan was elaborated using the software Vision 64 and the average roughness S_a (arithmetic average of the 3D roughness) was extrapolated for each of the 630×470 μm scans. To have the most representative values, measurements have been taken in 3 different parts of the sample which do not contain evident defects.

4. Conclusions

In this article, the effect of cation and anion in novel ionic liquids as corrosion inhibitors was investigated. All the new compounds were obtained as solids (except [Emim]Van) with melting temperature below 200 °C, with the class of DBU that degrades before melting. From the thermal characterizations, it emerged that they present different behaviors, especially in the case of gallate anion which showed two distinct degradation events, with a third one appearing when combined with choline cation. The choline cation seems to cause the presence of an additional degradation event also in combination with the syringate anion.

From preliminary electrochemical tests, the DBU cation and vanillate anion showed low anticorrosion properties and for this reason they have been discarded.

The gallate anion has been less effective as part of the IL inhibitors, most likely as it takes part in the formation of a soluble complex with iron, which does not show any protection against corrosion, as it was confirmed by surface analysis.

The syringate anion in solution has shown an increase in the impedance when combined with each cation and a significant decrease in the corrosion current. From the SEM and EDS, it was possible to see from both the ILs [Chol]Syr and [Emim]Syr deposits containing carbon and nitrogen atoms, that confirmed the presence of the inhibitor on the surface. This result demonstrates how the inhibitor was able to interact with the surface of the steel and shut down the corrosion processes.

Even if further studies are needed to confirm and clarify the degradation mechanism of these ILs and their anticorrosion behaviors, it can be stated that the fully bio-based [Chol]Syr was the most effective corrosion inhibitor, presenting an inhibitor efficiency of 96% and a reduction in corrosion current from 1.66 µA/cm² to 0.066 µA/cm² when the IL was added to a 0.01 M NaCl solution.