Preprint Article Version 2 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

Breaking Barriers: Initial Step Towards Certification Standards for Aircraft Wing-Structure-Integrated High-Pressure Composite Hydrogen Tanks

Version 1 : Received: 27 June 2023 / Approved: 29 June 2023 / Online: 29 June 2023 (10:45:24 CEST)
Version 2 : Received: 30 June 2023 / Approved: 3 July 2023 / Online: 4 July 2023 (03:15:29 CEST)

How to cite: Butt, J.A.; Markmiller, J.F.C. Breaking Barriers: Initial Step Towards Certification Standards for Aircraft Wing-Structure-Integrated High-Pressure Composite Hydrogen Tanks. Preprints 2023, 2023062101. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202306.2101.v2 Butt, J.A.; Markmiller, J.F.C. Breaking Barriers: Initial Step Towards Certification Standards for Aircraft Wing-Structure-Integrated High-Pressure Composite Hydrogen Tanks. Preprints 2023, 2023062101. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202306.2101.v2

Abstract

Standards are not only crucial for obtaining a certification for practical use, but also an essential guidance for inferring how and what to simulate as well test experimentally. This paper examines the potential applicability of existing standards from various domains, including aerospace and automotive, to Wing-Structure- Integrated high-pressure Hydrogen Tanks (SWITHs). It highlights the associated challenges and uncertainties, acknowledging the absence of a single, all-encompassing standard for SWITHs. We embark on an exploration aimed at identifying alternative standards that are best suited for SWITHs. The analysis scrutinizes existing standards that could potentially facilitate SWITH certification, with a particular focus on the inclusivity of externally loaded hydrogen tanks. Assessment criteria are established to filter standards that best meet the needs of SWITHs. Through this process, we identify two key standards that present themselves as the most promising alternatives. Moreover, we delineate the technical constraints involved in selecting the maximum nominal working pressure for high-pressure tanks intended for burst tests. Our findings reveal a current upper limit of 525 bar, imposed by the limitations of existing test facilities. The study underscores that these standards should serve as flexible guiding frameworks rather than rigid protocols, encouraging progressive development in the SWITH field.

Keywords

structure-integrated tanks; high pressure composite hydrogen tanks; hydrogen standards in aviation; standard for strucutre-integrated hydrogen tanks; SWITH

Subject

Engineering, Aerospace Engineering

Comments (1)

Comment 1
Received: 4 July 2023
Commenter: Javed Butt
Commenter's Conflict of Interests: Author
Comment: Replaced the first figure with something that is believed to show the concept of swiths better.
+ Respond to this comment

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 1
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.