PreprintArticleVersion 1Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed
Assessment of Two Materials as Adsorbents for the Effective Removal and Further Pre-concentration of Gallium from Aqueous Solutions: Mesoporous Carbon vs Clinoptilolite
Sáez, P.; Bernabé, I.; Gómez, J.M.; Díez, E.; Fraile, C.; García, N.; Rodríguez, A. Assessment of Two Materials as Adsorbents for the Effective Removal and Further Pre-Concentration of Gallium from Aqueous Solutions: Mesoporous Carbon vs. Clinoptilolite. Separations2023, 10, 349.
Sáez, P.; Bernabé, I.; Gómez, J.M.; Díez, E.; Fraile, C.; García, N.; Rodríguez, A. Assessment of Two Materials as Adsorbents for the Effective Removal and Further Pre-Concentration of Gallium from Aqueous Solutions: Mesoporous Carbon vs. Clinoptilolite. Separations 2023, 10, 349.
Sáez, P.; Bernabé, I.; Gómez, J.M.; Díez, E.; Fraile, C.; García, N.; Rodríguez, A. Assessment of Two Materials as Adsorbents for the Effective Removal and Further Pre-Concentration of Gallium from Aqueous Solutions: Mesoporous Carbon vs. Clinoptilolite. Separations2023, 10, 349.
Sáez, P.; Bernabé, I.; Gómez, J.M.; Díez, E.; Fraile, C.; García, N.; Rodríguez, A. Assessment of Two Materials as Adsorbents for the Effective Removal and Further Pre-Concentration of Gallium from Aqueous Solutions: Mesoporous Carbon vs. Clinoptilolite. Separations 2023, 10, 349.
Abstract
In this research, the adsorption of gallium onto natural zeolite (clinoptilolite) and two mesoporous activated carbons was compared and evaluated. The clinoptilolite was treated with HCl (HCPL) while mesoporous activated carbons (MCSG60A and MCO1) were synthesized by replica method, using sucrose as carbon precursor and silica gel as template. These carbonacenous materials showed large pore sizes and mesoporous surface, as well as a suitable surface chemistry for cation adsorption, which promotes a high negative charge density. On the other hand, zeolites have narrower pore sizes, which hinders the material diffusion inside the particle; however, its strength is their ion exchange capacity. Regarding the gallium kinetic studies, it is described by Pseudo-second order model for both sorts of adsorbents. MCO1 is the best carbonaceous adsorbent studied, with a capacity of 4.58 mg/g. As for zeolites, between the two zeolites studied, HCPL showed the best results, with a gallium adsorption capacity of 3.1 mg/g. The gallium adsorption mechanism onto MCO1 material is based on physisorption while HCPL is mainly retained due to an ion-exchange process. Regarding Giles classification, MCO1 isotherm described an H-4 pattern of high affinity, characteristic of multilayer adsorption. Double-Langmuir model fits properly these experimental results. In the case of zeolites, HCPL adsorption isotherm followed an L-2 pattern, typical of monolayer adsorption, being the Sips model the one which better describes the adsorption of gallium onto the zeolite.
Copyright:
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
,
*
,
,
