Preprint
Article

This version is not peer-reviewed.

Association Study of Agronomic and Oil Traits in Rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) Mutant Lines Using Genotyping-by-Sequencing

Submitted:

26 April 2023

Posted:

27 April 2023

You are already at the latest version

Abstract
Rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) is one of the most oil crop, and its commercial value is contingent upon its agronomic characteristics and oil quality. In this study, 73,226 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) across 95 rapeseed mutant lines derived from gamma rays and their original cultivar (‘Tamra’) obtained from genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS) was investigated gene ontology (GO) analysis and genome-wide association study (GWAS). GWAS was conducted on agronomic (plant height, ear length, thousand seed weight and seed yield) and oil (fatty acid and crude fat) traits. GO analysis showed that many genes displaying SNPs were involved in cellular processes, intracellular anatomical structures and organic cyclic compound binding. A total of 149 significant SNPs were associated with the agronomic traits (76 SNPs) and oil traits (73 SNPs). Bna.A05p02350D (SFGH) and Bna.C02p22490D (MDN1) were selected as novel candid genes for thousand seed weight. In addition, Bna.C03p14350D (EXO70) and Bna.A09p05630D (PI4Kα1) were selected as novel candidate genes for the erucic acid and crude fat content, respectively. These findings could facilitate the identification of optimal genotypes for breeding new cultivars, and association studies represent an economically efficient tool for mutant screening and the selection of elite rapeseed-breeding lines.
Keywords: 
;  ;  ;  ;  

1. Introduction

Rapeseed (Brassica napus L.), an interspecific amphidiploid hybrid (2n = 38) [1], belonging to the genus Brassica in the family Brassicaceae, emerged from natural hybridization between Brassica rapa and Brassica oleracea [1,2]. This versatile crop is distinguished by its capacity to yield substantial amounts of oil, which is deemed a vital and salubrious vegetable oil worldwide [2]. Its multifarious applications span a wide range of industries, including but not limited to, food, animal feed, energy, and chemical industries [1,3]. As such, breeders have endeavored to breed new rapeseed cultivars with modified and advantageous agronomic characteristics, such as heightened yields and disease resistance, and oil traits, such as altered fatty acid compositions and crude fat content [2,4]. However, the genetic resources of rapeseed with natural properties that are germane to its agronomic and oil-related traits are meager in Korea [4]. Given the scarcity of genetic diversity in this crop, mutagenesis offers an efficacious approach to generate novel genetic resources, enabling the attainment of desirable traits, such as elevated yields and modified fatty acid compositions in rapeseed [1,2,4].
The weight of rapeseed seeds is widely considered to be a critical determinant of overall yield, and is thus a key trait for plant evolution and crop enhancement [4,5]. Seeds that are small in size have a greater potential for dispersion, while larger seeds tend to exhibit higher adaptability to both biotic and abiotic stress factors [2,6]. Additionally, the seedlings that emerge from larger seeds often possess superior competitive survival rates compared to those arising from smaller seeds, thus making seed weight a critical trait for plant fitness and survival [2,5,6]. Many crops have larger seed sizes than their wild relatives [5,6,7]. Hence, the identification of genes that are linked with thousand seed weight is of significant importance.
The quality of rapeseed oil is a crucial factor for the economic feasibility of its industrial application [3,4]. The nutritional and healthy properties of rapeseed oil are predominantly determined by the fatty acid compositions, which are synthesized through a series of biochemical reactions involving acetyl-CoA and NADPH [4,8]. Rapeseed oil, known for its high erucic acid content, was initially used in limited quantities due to its damaging effects on animal cardiac muscles [3,9,10]. However, modern breeding strategies for edible oil production have focused on developing canola-type rapeseed with double low seeds, low in erucic acid and glucosinolate content [1,10]. The resulting fatty acid composition of canola-type rapeseed oil, comprising 7% palmitic acid, 2% stearic acid, 61% oleic acid, 11% linoleic acid, and 21% linolenic acid, is considered nutritionally optimal, with high-oleic acid oil ( > 70%) gaining popularity as a source of healthy and stable cooking oil [1,10,11]. On the other hand, rapeseed oil with high erucic acid content has been found to be suitable for various industrial applications, such as polyethylene films, biodegradable plastic, biodiesel, printing, and the steel metal industries [10,12]. The crushing industry derives its primary value from the oil content of oilseed rapeseeds, despite the value of the protein for animal feed [3,10,11]. This is particularly crucial for the development of the biodiesel market and cooking oil production, where the optimization of production costs is of utmost importance [1,11,12]. Due to the tremendous economic importance of rapeseed oil and its expanding use as a renewable feedstock, the increased seed oil content is critical. Therefore, optimizing the fatty acid composition of rapeseed oil is a crucial objective of various breeding programs.
Mutation breeding is a method that involves the use of physical and/or chemical mutagens to induce genetic alterations in plants, resulting in the development of useful characteristics for commercialization purposes [4,13]. This process requires selecting the most effective mutation for modifying agronomic characteristics and oil traits, which can be achieved through various mutagenesis techniques [7,14]. Gamma-ray irradiation is one of the most commonly used techniques in plant mutation breeding due to its ability to induce vast amounts of genetic alterations [13,15]. It has been successful in inducing translocations in amphiploidy with desirable genes, resulting in seed yields, semi-dwarf varieties, and broader disease resistance [6,7,13]. Additionally, mutagenesis by gamma irradiation has been shown to stimulate genetic recombination, which broadens the mutation spectrum and enhances the efficacy of the technique [4,7,15].
Nowadays, advances in next-generation sequencing (NGS) technology have enabled effective sequencing of plant genomes and the direct detection of SNPs, which promotes the development of cultivars of interest in plant breeding [4,16]. GBS reduces the genomic complexity by digesting the genome into small fragments (with restriction enzymes) that are read on a short-read sequencing platform [16,17]. As the availability of entire genome sequences and SNP arrays has increased, association mapping has become a robust approach for determining genetic characteristics, which can significantly increase the precision of quantitative trait locus (QTL)-based position estimates [17,18]. Moreover, association mapping has been used to overcome the limitations of QTL mapping, particularly because of the large number of SNP markers identified by NGS [16,18]. The recent completion of the B. napus genome enabled direct com parisons between documented complex traits associated with mapping studies [4,7,11]. The identification of SNPs through GBS not only enables the analysis of genetic diversity but also facilitates the integration of GWAS into a unified research project [16,18,19]. GWAS are a powerful tool for identifying QTLs and genes in crops, such as rapeseed, soybean, and rice [6,17,19,20].
We have developed mutant rapeseed lines derived from gamma-radiation mutation, and these lines have a variety of agronomic characteristics (plant height, ear length, thousand seed weight and seed yield) and oil trait (fatty acid compositions and crude fat content). The objectives of this study were the identification of SNPs in 95 rapeseed mutant lines, and to identify candidate genes related to agronomic and oil traits using a GWAS.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Material

The seed of the ‘Tamra’ cultivar was obtained from the Bioenergy Crop Research Center (Rural Development Administration, Korea). Mutant rapeseed lines were generated by treating the seeds with 700 Gy of gamma (60Co) radiation at 2008 [4]. The procedure used to develop mutant rapeseed lines is shown in Figure 1. The treated seeds were sown to obtain the M1 generation, and seeds from one silique (developed from the main stem of each M1 plant) were harvested. M2 seeds from 200 individual plants were grown with a single replicate. In the M2 generation, all individuals were investigated for morphological and agronomic mutations relative to the original cultivar. One hundred and twenty rapeseed mutants, selected based on their agronomic characteristics were obtained from the M3 and M5 generations. We analysed the uniformity of the fatty acid compositions by GC-MS (Gas chromatography mass spectrometry) and crude fat content for two generations (M6 to M7) to select stable lines. Finally, 95 rapeseed mutants lines that varied in agronomic characteristics, fatty acid compositions and crude fat content exhibited stable inheritance of the mutated characteristics from M8 generations were selected. The selfing procedure was continued until the M8 generation. Four agronomic traits including plant height, ear length, thousand seed weight and seed yield were investigated according to the International union for the protection of new varieties of plants (UPOV) test guidelines for rapeseed and the standard of research and investigation for agronomic traits. Cultivars with radiation-generated mutant genotypes were grown by the Radiation Breeding Research Team at the Advanced Radiation Technology Institute of the Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute, Korea.

2.2. Determination of Fatty Acid Compositions and Crude Fat Contents

The seed oil content was analyzed using the AOAC method as previously described. Using the Soxhlet extraction procedure, 5 g crushed seeds (80 mashed) were packed into a thimble and the oils were extracted with diethyl ether for 6 h. Fatty acid compositions were measured previously described method. The rapeseed oil was extracted from rapeseed powder in 1 mL of chloroform-hexane-methanol (8:5:2, v/v/v) for 12 h. From this, 200 μL of extracted oil was added to 75 μL of methylation reagent (0.25 M methanolic sodium methoxide: petroleum ether: ethyl ether, 1:5:2, v/v/v) for derivatization. Hexane was added to bring the total volume up to 1 mL. The fatty acid composition of the rapeseed seed oil was analyzed using a GC-MS (Plus-2010, Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) instrument equipped with an HP-88 capillary column (J&W Scientific, 60 m × 0.25 mm × 0.25 μm) under the following conditions: ionization voltage, 70 eV; mass scan range, 50–450 mass units; injector temperature, 230 °C; detector temperature, 230 °C; injection volume, 1 μL; split ratio, 1:30; carrier gas, helium; and flow rate, 1.7 mL/min. The column temperature program specified an isothermal temperature of 40 °C for 5 min increasing to 180 °C at a rate of 5 °C/min then a subsequent increase to 230 °C at a rate of 1 °C/min. It was identified that the substances present in the extracts according to their retention time (RT) and using the mass spectra database (NIST 62 Library).

2.3. DNA Extraction

Young leaves were sampled from the original cultivar ‘Tamra’ and 95 rapeseed mutant lines. Genomic DNA was isolated using a DNeasy 250 Plant Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The extracted DNAs were stored at 4 °C until use. For polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis and, DNA concentrations were determined using a NanoDrop ND-1000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific., Waltham, MA, USA) were then adjusted to 30 ng/μL.

2.4. Library Construction and Genotyping-by-Sequencing (GBS)

GBS libraries were constructed using the restriction enzyme ApeKI (5′-GCWGC-3′; New England Biolabs, MA, USA) following a protocol modified from that of a previous study [21]. Oligonucleotides constituting the top and bottom strands of each barcode adapter and a common adapter were separately diluted with TE buffer (50 μM each) and annealed using a thermocycler. DNA samples (100 ng/μL) were added to individual adapter-containing wells. Samples (DNA with adapters) were digested with ApeKI overnight at 75 °C. Sets of digested DNA samples, each with a different barcode adapter, were combined (5 μL each) and purified using the QIA quick PCR Purification Kit; (Qiagen, CA, USA), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Restriction fragments from each library were then amplified in 50 μL volumes containing 2 μL of pooled DNA fragments, HerculaseII Fusion DNA Polymerase (Agilent, CA, USA), and 25 pmol each of the following primers: (A) 5′-AAT GAT ACG GCG ACC ACC GAG ATC TAC ACT CTT TCC CTA CAC GAC GCT CTT CCG ATC T-3′ and (B) 5′-CAA GCA GAA GAC GGC ATA CGA GAT CGG TCT CGG CAT TCC TGC TGA ACC GCT CTT CCG ATC T-3′. These amplified sample pools constituted a sequencing ‘library’. The library was sequenced on the Illumina Hiseq X ten platform by SEEDERS Co. (Daejeon, Korea).

2.5. Sequence Preprocessing and Alignment to Reference Genome Sequence

Demultiplexing was performed using the barcode sequence, and adapter sequence removal and sequence quality trimming were performed. Adapter trimming was performed using Cutadapt (ver. 1.8.3) [22], and sequence quality trimming was performed using DynamicTrim and LengthSort of the SolexaQA program (ver.1.13) [23]. DynamicTrim cuts low-quality bases at both ends of short reads according to the Phred score, and refines it with high-quality cleaned reads. LengthSort removes excess base cuts made in DynamicTrim; Phred score of Dynamic-Trim ≥ 20, and LengthSort using short read lengths ≥ 25 bp. BWA (0.7.17-r1188) [24] generated cleaned reads passing the preprocessing process, and performed mapping to the reference genome sequence. Mapping was a preliminary step to detect raw SNPs (In/Del) sequenced samples. BAM format file was created, and default values were used, except for the following options: a seed length (−l) of 30, maximum differences in the seed (−k) of 1, number of threads (−t) of 16, mismatch penalty (−M) of 6, gap opening penalty (−O) of 15, and gap extension penalty (−E) of 8. The experiment was conducted in repetition.

2.6. Raw SNP Detection and Consensus Sequence Extraction

Clean reads were mapped to the standard genome sequence, and the generated BAM format files were used to detect raw SNPs using SAMtools (ver. 0.1.16) [25], and extract consensus sequences. SNP validation was performed using SEEDERS in-house script [26] before SNP detection; raw SNP detection was performed, and default values were used, except for the following options: a minimum mapping quality for SNPs (−Q) of 30, minimum mapping quality for gaps (−q) of 15, minimum read depth (−d) of 3, minimum indel score for nearby SNP filtering (−G) of 30, SNPs within INT bp around a gap to be filtered (−w) of 15, window size for filtering dense SNPs (−W) of 15, and maximum read depth (−D) of 675.

2.7. Generate SNP Matrix

To conduct the analysis of SNPs between the analyzed objects, an integrated SNP matrix was generated between samples. A list of unions was created using the raw SNP positions obtained by comparing each sample with a standard dielectric, and a non-SNP locus was filled in from the consensus sequence of the sample. Then, the final SNP matrix was generated by filtering the mis-called SNP positions through SNP comparison among samples. SNPs were divided into homozygous (SNP read depth ≥ 90%), heterozygous (40% ≤ SNP read depth ≤ 60%), and other (homozygous/heterozygous; could not be distinguished by type) groups based on their position. The named SNP positions were classified into “intergenic or genic regions” based on the position information of the standard genome sequence, and the genic region was further classified into “CDS or intron regions”. The common SNP in the original cultivar ‘Tamra’ was selected first in the integrated SNP matrix position between mutant lines, and the polymorphic SNP was selected by comparing the common SNP of the original cultivar with the base sequence of each mutant. In order to perform gene ontology (GO) analysis and flexible relationship analysis, SNP loci of each mutant line were integrated to secure the SNP locus of the union.

2.8. Gene Ontology (GO) Analysis of Genes with Polymorphic SNPs

Gene ontology alignment was performed using candidate sequences containing polymorphic SNPs and sequences provided by GO database in house scripts [27]. Thresholds were classified into three functional categories: BP (Biological Process), CC (Cellular Component), and MF (Molecular Function), with a significance level of 0.01 (E-value ≤ 1.0 × 10−10, best hits).

2.9. GWAS with Agronomic Characteristics, Fatty Acid and Crude Fat

For the GWAS, a total 73,226 filtered SNPs with 5% < minor allele frequency, missing data < 30% were filtered from raw data and were used to perform GWAS analysis using generalized linear model (GLM) in Trait Analysis by Association, Evolution and Linkage (TASSEL), TASSEL 5 [28]. All parameters for GWAS were set as default values. The –log10(p) threshold of the quantile-quantile plot and Manhattan plot was calculated using the Bonferroni method (p = α/n). With 73,226 SNPs employed in this study, at α = 1, the Bonferroni-corrected thresholds for the p values were 1.36 × 10−5 (α = 1), with corresponding –log10(p) values of 4.864 for the suggestive threshold [29].

3. Results

3.1. Agronomic Characteristics

Ninety-five rapeseed mutant lines and their original cultivar ‘Tamra’ were selected for evaluation in terms of their agronomic characteristics (Table 1). The rapeseed mutant population showed wide variability in the traits measured over the course of 2 years. The plant height of the original cultivar was 163.5 cm. The plant height of rapeseed mutant lines ranged from 134.0 cm (Tr2-2) to 175.0 cm (Tr25-14). The ear length of the original cultivar was 55.5 cm. The ear length of all mutant lines ranged from 35.0 cm (Tr8-3-1) to 77.5 cm (Tr38-7). Significant differences in the thousand seed weight and the seed yield were observed between all mutant lines. With the original cultivar, the thousand seed weight was 3.8 g. The Tr6-11-1 line had the highest (5.4 g), whereas the Tr138-L line had the lowest (2.8 g) thousand seed weight. The seed yield of original cultivar was 309 kg/10a. The highest seed yield (398 kg/10a) was observed with the Tr38-4 line, and the lowest seed yield (144 kg/10a) was found with the Tr14-3 line.

3.2. Fatty Acid Compositions and Crude Fat Contents

The fatty acid compositions and crude fat content of the original cultivar ‘Tamra’ and 95 rapeseed mutant lines genotypes are shown in Table 2. The composition of palmitic (C16:0), stearic (C18:0), oleic (C18:1), linoleic (C18:2), linolenic (C18:3), and eicosenoic acid (C20:1) of the original cultivar was 5.5%, 1.9%, 65.5%, 20.5%, 5.6%, and 1.0%, respectively. Palmitoleic acid (C16:1) and erucic acids (C22:1) were not detected in the original cultivar. On the other hand, 0.1% to 0.76% of palmitoleic acid was detected in 50 mutant lines. The stearic acid content of the mutant lines ranged from 0.2% to 4.4%, with an average of 1.7%. Significant differences in oleic acid composition were observed among the mutant lines. The oleic acid composition of the mutant lines ranged from 32.4% to 81.7%, and the oleic acid content was the highest in the Tr4 mutant line. Likewise, nine mutant lines (Tr2-late, Tr3, Tr5, Tr5-1, Tr7, Tr25-10, Tr8-3-1, Tr6-4, and Tr8-1) also showed higher oleic acid composition ( > 70%) than the other genotypes. The highest linoleic acid composition was recorded at 33.5% in the Tr138-15 mutant line, and the lowest value of 7.9% was found in the Tr1-1 line. The highest linolenic acid content was found in the Tr5-3 line (13.7%), whereas the lowest content was detected in the Tr65-7 line (4.0%). Eicosenoic acid was not present in seven mutant lines (Tr25-12, Tr38-7, Tr38-16, Tr38-17, Tr65-7, Tr65-9, and Tr65-10). The eicosenoic acid content of the remaining mutant lines ranged from 0.4% to 13.1%, with the highest composition recorded in Tr14-1. Erucic acid was detected in 43 mutant lines with a composition range of 0.2% to 29.0%. Two mutant lines (Tr14-1 and Tr14-5) showed a relatively high composition of erucic acid ( > 20%). The crude fat content of the original cultivar was 40.16 mg/100 g. The crude fat content for all mutant lines ranged from 21.31 to 40.98 mg/100 g with an average of 37.22 mg/100 g. Crude fat content similar to that of the original ‘Tamra’ cultivar was observed in 9 mutant lines (Tr5-1, Tr14-8, Tr14-9, Tr14-20, Tr25-6, Tr25-10, Tr65-10, Tr138-13, and Tr8-5-1). The Tr14-5, Tr18-2, Tr25-1, and Tr25-2 lines contained lower levels of crude fat than the original cultivar.

3.3. GBS Analysis of Rapeseed Mutant Lines

A GBS library consisting of 96 rapeseed genotypes (95 novel mutant lines and the original cultivar) was sequenced using the Illumina HiSeq X ten platform (Illumina, Madison, WI, USA). A summary of GBS sequencing results is presented in Table 3 and Table S1. In total, 715 million reads comprising 108,004,241,578 nucleotides (108 Gb) were generated, with 7.45 million reads per genotype. After removing low-quality sequences, 655,243,166 clean reads remained, with 6.8 million reads per genotype on average. The total length of the clean reads ranged between 73,633,121 base pairs (bp) and 5,305,962,156 bp, with an average read length of 777,311,365 bp (Table S1). The total number of mapped reads was 651,288,040 for all lines, with an average of 6,784,250 reads per sample. The mapped-read rates (%) ranged from 98.98% to 99.46%. On average, 99.39% of the filtered reads were mapped to the reference genome sequence (Table S1). The total length of the mapped region was 3,163,629,539 bp, with an average of 32,954,474 bp per sample, which covered approximately 3.57% of the reference genome sequence.

3.4. Identification of SNPs

The SNPs for each genotype were first selected from the union of SNPs in the matrix position between the samples and the reference genome sequence. A summary of SNPs detection of the original cultivar ‘Tamra’ and 95 rapeseed mutant lines are shown Table S2. In total, 9,381,607 SNP loci were identified for all genotypes, of which 5,392,272 SNP loci were homozygous for the major allele, 1,500,793 SNPs were heterozygous, and SNP 2,448,542 SNPs were etc. (homozygous/heterozygous; could not be distinguished by type) (Table S2). The largest number of SNPs was recorded for the original cultivar (183,638 SNPs), and the lowest number was recorded for the Tr65-2 mutant line (17,097 SNPs). The number of homozygous SNPs ranged from 11,879 to 101,493, with an average of 56,170 per sample. The number of heterozygous SNPs ranged from 2,176 to 39,895, with an average of 15,633 per sample. In other words, more homozygous SNPs were found than heterozygous SNPs. The SNP distribution in the rapeseed chromosomes ranged from 4,870 (chromosome A04) to 14,497 (chromosome C03), with a mean of 9,378 per chromosome (Figure 2). Specifically, the number of SNPs was highest in the order of chromosomes A09, C01, C02, C03, and A09.
To identify gamma irradiation-induced mutations, the polymorphic SNPs were identified by comparing common SNPs (the first selected 9,381,607 SNPs) in the original cultivar with the corresponding sequences of the mutant lines (Table S3). In total, 182,257 union SNPs were observed among all mutant lines, where the largest number of polymorphic SNPs was recorded for Tr6-11-1 (25,568 SNPs), and the lowest number was recorded for the Tr65-2 mutant line (2,281 SNPs). The number of homozygous polymorphic SNPs ranged from 1,620 to 19,590, with an average of 8,225 per mutant line. The number of heterozygous polymorphic SNPs ranged from 661 to 14,277, with an average of 4,051 per mutant line.
Functional annotation of the SNPs in the rapeseed mutant lines was performed using the reference genome sequence (Table S4). In total, 181,225 union SNPs were classified for genome annotation. Of the 181,225 union SNPs, 99,098 SNPs (54.7%) were located in genic regions, and 82,127 SNPs (45.3%) were detected in intergenic regions, encompassing 30,121 genes. Within the genic regions, some SNPs were found in untranslated regions (UTRs, 3,166 SNPs), and the remaining SNPs were located in coding sequences (67,561 SNPs) and introns (29,067 SNPs).

3.5. Gene Ontology (GO) Analysis of Genes with Polymorphic SNPs

To functionally classify the genes mutated by gamma-ray irradiations in the mutant lines, GO enrichment analysis was conducted with 30,121 genes carrying polymorphic SNPs (p < 0.05) (Table S5). The genes were classified into three main categories: biological process (BP), cellular component (CC), and molecular function (MF) genes (Figure 3). Genes containing BP SNPs included those involved in cellular processes (13,144 genes), metabolic processes (11,154 genes), organic substance metabolic processes (10,584 genes), and cellular metabolic processes (10,038 genes). CC SNPs were found in genes associated with intracellular anatomical structures (15,349 genes), organelle entities (13,635 genes), and intracellular organelles (13,624 genes). MF SNPs were identified in genes related to GO terms such as binding (9,513 genes), organic cyclic compound binding (5,795 genes), heterocyclic compound binding (5,776 genes), ion binding (4,955 genes), and protein binding (3,451 genes).

3.6. GWAS for Agronomic Characteristics

In this study, association analysis was performed with a generalized linear model for the four agronomic traits. According to the results of the Manhattan and QQ plots presented in Figure 4, 76 SNPs across 14 chromosomes for TSW were detected at the significance threshold level (-log10(p) = 4.864) (Table 4 and Table S6). However, no suggestive or significant SNPs were detected for the PH, EL, and SY. Among the 73,226 union SNPs dataset associations identified, 76 SNPs were significantly associated with agronomic characteristics (Table S7), when applying the generalized linear model (GLM). Of the 76 selected union SNPs, 55 were located in genic regions, and 21 were detected in intergenic regions. A total of 14 genes (S-formylglutathione hydrolase-like (SFGH), zinc finger BED domain-containing protein RICESLEEPER 1-like (ZBED1), midasin-like (MDN1), villin-3-like isoform X2 (VLN3), death-associated inhibitor of apoptosis 1 (DIAP1), ubiquitin-like-specific protease 1C (ULP1C), chitinase 1 (CHIT1), amino acid transporter AVT1A (AVT1A), endoribonuclease Dicer homolog 1-like (DLC1), AP-1 complex subunit mu-2 (AP1M2), RNA-binding protein 5 (RBP5), ATPase 6, plasma membrane-type (AHA6), serine acetyltransferase 5 (SAT5), and U2 snRNP-associated SURP motif-containing protein isoform X2 (U2SURP)) were annotated from thousand seed weight.

3.7. GWAS for Fatty Acid and Crude Fat

In this study, association analysis was performed with a generalized linear model for the 8 fatty acid and crude fat. According to the results of the Manhattan and QQ plots presented in Figure 5, 2 SNPs across 1 chromosome for C16:1, 1 SNP across 1 chromosome for C18:0, 1 SNP across 1 chromosome for the C18:1, 6 SNP across 6 chromosomes for C20:1, 26 SNPs across 10 chromosomes for C22:1, 37 SNPs across 10 chromosomes for crude fat were detected at the significance threshold level (-log10(p) = 4.864) (Table 5 and Table S8). However, no suggestive or significant SNPs were detected for the C16:0, C18:2, and C18:3. Among the 73,226 union SNPs dataset associations identified, 73 SNPs were significantly associated with oil traits (Table S9), when applying the generalized linear model (GLM). Of the 73 selected union SNPs, 37 were located in genic regions, and 36 were detected in intergenic regions. One gene (Encodes a putative E3 ubiquitin ligase (SUD1)) was annotated from C16:1. For C20:1, two SNPs were located in the genic region (CDS), and were associated with probable Xaa-Pro aminopeptidase P isoform X2 (XPNPEP1), and hypothetical protein. A total of 26 SNPs (CDS; 6 SNPs, introns; 3 SNPs, intergenic; 16 SNPs, and UTR; 1 SNP) loci were significantly associated with C22:1, including six genes (EXO70 gene family (EXO70), paramyosin-like (Prm), mediator of RNA polymerase II transcription subunit 34 (MED34), cyclin-C1-1 (CCNC), ribonuclease T2 family (RNASET2), and protein ENHANCED DISEASE RESISTANCE 2-like isoform X2 (EDR2)) that were annotated from C22:1. A total of 10 genes (Part of a nanodomain complex that tethers PI4Kα1 to the plasma membrane (PI4Kα1), 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate synthase 6 (ACS6), mitoferrin (Mfrn), Transmembrane amino acid transporter family protein (TAAT), chromo domain-containing protein LHP1-like (LHP1), non-lysosomal glucosylceramidase (GBA2), RING-H2 finger protein ATL47-like (ATL47), embryogenesis-associated protein EMB8 (EMB8), CEP DOWNSTREAM 1 (CEPD1), and protein CHUP1, chloroplastic-like (CHUP1)) were annotated from crude fat.

4. Discussion

High seed yield has been most important factor in rapeseed breeding. Normally, seed yield revealed to the environmental conditions, genotypes and those interactions [5]. In a previous study, genotypes have a great influence on the rapeseed seed yield [5,6]. Also, the relatively limited genetic resources of rapeseed breeding materials restrict the potential for further improvement in seed yield [6,7,30]. The rapeseed seed yield depends on various agronomic traits, such as the ear length, branch numbers, silique numbers, number of seeds/siliques, thousand seed weight, and disease resistance [2,5,6,9,30]. The original cultivar ‘Tamra’ has low seed yield (300–350 kg/10a-1), resulting in low industrial value [31]. In this study, the original cultivar ‘Tamra’ and 95 rapeseed mutant lines were analyzed during two years for the assessment of yield. Fifteen rapeseed mutant lines were approximately 26% higher (over 390 kg/10a) than that of the original cultivar. These results indicate that it is useful as a material for developing new rapeseed cultivar with high seed yield trait.
Industrial demands for rapeseed oils includes the ability to change the quality of fatty acids, and the demands are recognized by various breeders [3,12]. Their values and major applications depend on their fatty acid compositions [3,4]. Rapeseed oil is rich in unsaturated fatty acids, such as oleic acid, linoleic acid, and linolenic acid, which are generally recognized as useful oil compounds [3,8,11,12]. Gamma rays have been widely applied to mutation breeding programs because of their high radiolucency to plant organs and can cause mutations affecting agronomic and chemical traits [13,14,32]. Furthermore, gamma rays are particularly effective in changing the oil traits of various oilseed crops [20,32]. Radiation-induced mutagenesis techniques have been successfully developed with oil crops to generate useful mutants with economic traits, oil contents, and fatty acid compositions [11,13,33]. Rapeseed has been mutagenized using physical mutagens to improve many important characteristics, including its ability to produce high-quality industrial oil [4,12,34]. Oleic acid (C18:1) and linoleic acid (C18:2) are considered healthy and nutritious [3,8]. On the other hand, the three double-bonds of extracted linolenic acid (C18:3) are easily oxidized, which leads to a reduced frying thermal stability and storage time of the oil [3,11]. It is also important to develop cultivars with a high percentage of erucic acid oil, a valuable raw material used in the plastic film and nylon industries [3,10,11]. The original cultivar ‘Tamra’ oleic acid content was 65.5%, the erucic acid content was 0%. The oleic acid contents of the Tr3 (78.6%), Tr4 (81.73%), Tr5 (79.43%), and Tr7 (78.7%) mutant lines were higher ( ≥ 75%) than those of different genotypes. The erucic acid contents of the Tr14-1 (23.6%) and Tr14-5 (29%) mutant lines were higher ( ≥ 20%) than those of different genotypes. In this study, oleic acid and erucic acid showed the greatest changes. Tr14-1 had an erucic acid content of 23.6% when the oleic acid content was 32.4%, and Tr14-5 had an erucic acid content of 29% when the oleic acid content was 32.8%. Thus, the gamma ray irradiation induced mutation influence on fatty acid compositions in rapeseed [3,4,13,20] and these mutant lines are potentially useful as materials for developing new rapeseed cultivars with improved oil traits.
GO analysis of rapeseed genes containing polymorphic SNPs induced by gamma irradiation was conducted. GO grouping of the mutated genes indicated that many variations induced functional changes. With respect to the BP category, mutations occurred most frequently in genes involved in cellular processes (GO:0009987), metabolic processes (GO:0008152), organic substance metabolic processes (GO:0071704), cellular metabolic processes (GO:0044237), and primary metabolic processes (GO:0044238). Regarding the CC category, the associated intracellular entities included intracellular anatomical structure (GO:0005622), organelle (GO:0043226), intracellular organelle (GO:0043229), membrane-bound organelle (GO:0043227), and intracellular membrane-bound organelle (GO:0043231). In terms of the MF category, the major polymorphic SNPs were linked to GO terms such as binding (GO:0005488), organic cyclic compound binding (GO:0097159), heterocyclic compound binding (GO:1901363), ion binding (GO:0043167), and protein binding (GO:0005515). Guan et al. (2023) reported that GO enrichment analysis of genes with high expression levels during seed development showed in B. napus that the top three terms were gene expression, translational initiation, and cellular nitrogen compound metabolic process in the BP category; intracellular anatomical structure, organelle, and intracellular organelle in the CC category; and translation regulator activity, translation factor activity, RNA binding, and translation regulator activity, nucleic acid binding in the MF category [35]. These results suggest that the top three GO terms may play an important role in seed development in B. napus, and our results confirmed all of these terms (Table S5). Previously, GO analysis of variation in fatty acid-mutated 46 rapeseed genotypes derived from gamma rays included cellular processes (BP), primary metabolic processes (BP), and nitrogen compound metabolic processes (BP); intracellular entities (CC) organelles (CC) and intracellular organelles (CC); and nucleotide binding (MF), nucleoside phosphate binding (MF), and anion binding (MF) [4]. Therefore, it appears reasonable to expect that an appreciable similarity in mutations is observed in radiation mutagenesis among rapeseed mutant lines.
The GWAS detected significantly (-log10(p) > 4.864) associated 14 SNPs with thousand seed weight. Seed weight is a complex trait that is regulated by multiple genes and influenced by genotypes [5,6]. Seed weight is an important agronomic trait as it affects seed yield, germination rate, and seedling vigor [5,6,7,10]. Therefore, understanding the molecular mechanisms underlying seed weight regulation is of great interest to plant breeders. Several genes have been identified that play a role in controlling seed size and weight in plants process. Our findings suggest that SFGH, ZBED1, MDN1, VLN3, DCL1, AP1M2, RBP5, AHA6, SAT5, AVT1A, U2SURP, DIAP1, ULP1C, and CHIT1 are associated with thousand seed weight. The SFGH is a gene that encodes a protein that belongs to the esterase/lipase/thioesterase family [36]. This gene is known to play a role in the detoxification of formaldehyde, which is no direct evidence linking SFGH to seed weight, there have been studies that suggest that SFGH may play a role in larger leaves, higher biomass, and increased grain yield in wheat [36,37]. The relationship between SFGH and rapeseed seed weight is not well-understood and further research is needed to fully elucidate the role of this gene. The ZBED1 gene is a transcription factor that plays an important role in regulating seed development and maturation that overexpression of ZBED1 in rice (Oryza sativa) resulted in increased seed weight and yield [38]. Studies have shown that ZBED1 regulates the expression of genes involved in lipid metabolism, hormone signalling, and stress responses, which are all important processes in seed development and maturation [38,39]. Therefore, it is possible that the ZBED1 gene could have an impact on seed weight. The MDN1 gene as “low quality protein” genes are believed to play a role in various cellular processes, such as protein quality control and regulation of gene expression [40]. MDN1 has been shown to play a role in regulating seed weight by affecting the accumulation of storage proteins in the seeds in Arabidopsis thaliana [41]. Similarly, in rice, a MDN1 gene has been shown to affect seed weight by regulating the expression of genes involved in the synthesis of storage proteins [40,41]. VLN3 are actin-binding proteins that play important roles in cytoskeletal organization, cell migration, and cell signalling in various organisms, including plants [42]. VLN3 gene have been found to be associated with seed development and germination [42,43]. Therefore, VLN3 may play a role in seed development, more research is needed to determine its specific functions and the extent of its involvement in seed weight regulation. The DCL1 is involved in the process of RNA interference (RNAi), which is a mechanism for gene regulation [44]. Several studies have suggested a relationship between DCL1 and seed weight that loss of function mutations in DCL1 result in smaller seed size and low weight, while overexpression of DCL1 leads to larger seeds in Arabidopsis thaliana and rice [45]. One proposed mechanism for the role of DCL1 in seed weight regulation is through its involvement in the processing of microRNAs (miRNAs) [44,45]. The AP1M2 is a transcription factor that plays a role in various biological processes, including cell differentiation, proliferation, and apoptosis and the AP1M2 gene complex has also been linked to seed development and seed weight regulation [46]. The AP1M2 that has been implicated in seed weight regulation is the JUN-like transcription factor (JUB1) [47]. JUB1 has been shown to promote seed size and weight by regulating the expression of genes involved in cell proliferation and expansion in Arabidopsis thaliana [46,47]. Additionally, the AP1M2 has been shown to regulate seed size by promoting cell division and elongation in soybean [46,47]. The RBP5 is a protein that binds to RNA molecules and plays a role in post-transcriptional regulation of gene expression [48]. Previous studies have suggested that RBP5 may directly affect seed weight by overexpression of RBP5 resulted in larger seeds, likely due to increased expression of genes involved in embryo development and carbon metabolism in rice and Arabidopsis [48,49]. These studies suggest that RBP5 may play a role in this process by regulating the expression of genes involved in seed development and lipid metabolism. The AHA6 gene is a protein that belongs to the P-type ATPase family, which is involved in ion transport across membranes [50]. AHA6 has been studied in relation to seed weight regulation that overexpression of AHA6 resulted in increased seed weight and size, likely due to increased nutrient uptake and transport to the developing seeds [51]. Additionally, AHA6 was shown to interact with a protein involved in seed development and to affect the expression of genes involved in lipid metabolism and seed coat development in Arabidopsis [50,51]. These findings suggest that AHA6 may play a role in seed weight regulation by facilitating nutrient uptake and transport to developing seeds and by influencing the expression of genes involved in seed development and metabolism [50,51]. Therefore, AHA6 affects seed weight and to determine its potential as a target for crop improvement. SAT5 activity is positively correlated with seed weight that overexpression of SAT5 resulted increased to seed weight, while reducing SAT5 activity led to a decreased seed weight in maize [52]. The AVT1A gene encodes an amino acid transporter, which is involved in the uptake and transport of amino acids [53]. As for the relationship between AVT1A and seed weight, some studies have shown that mutations in the AVT1A gene can affect seed weight in Arabidopsis thaliana and Brassica napus [53,54]. These studies found that mutations in the AVT1A gene resulted in smaller seeds with reduced amino acid content [53,54]. This suggests that AVT1A plays a role in regulating seed size and amino acid metabolism in plants. The U2SURP gene is a protein involved in pre-mRNA splicing in plants [52]. As for the relationship between U2SURP and seed weight, a study on Arabidopsis thaliana found that overexpression of U2SURP resulted in early flowering and reduced root growth, which in turn led to reduced seed weight [55]. This suggests that U2SURP may play a role in regulating seed weight indirectly by influencing other aspects of plant growth and development [52,55]. The DIAP1, ULP1C, CHIT1 gene are currently no known direct relationship with seed weight. This concluded that SFGH, ZBED1, MDN1, VLN3, DCL1, AP1M2, RBP5, AHA6, SAT5, AVT1A, and U2SURP may be associated with the thousand seed weight.
The GWAS detected significantly (-log10(p) > 4.864) associated 8 SNPs with three fatty acid (palmitoleic acid, eicosenoic acid and erucic acid). The encodes a putative SUD1 showed significant associations with palmitoleic acid. However, the palmitoleic acid in relation to SUD1 is not clear. E3 ubiquitin ligases are enzymes that are involved in the regulation of protein degradation and play a key role in various cellular processes [56]. While, previous studies have suggested that palmitoleic acid may be involved in the regulation of ubiquitin-mediated protein degradation, more research is needed to understand the mechanisms underlying this process [56,57]. One gene XPNPEP1 was associated with the eicosenoic acid, these gene is no direct connection eicosenoic acid and fatty acid biosynthesis. A total of six genes (EXO70, Prm, MED34, CCNC, RNASET2 and EDR2) were annotated from erucic acid. The EXO70 encodes for proteins that are involved in the formation of the exocyst complex, which is responsible for the targeted delivery of membrane vesicles to specific locations on the plasma membrane [58]. The exocyst complex is essential for a variety of cellular processes, including cell polarity, cell division, and secretion [59]. The EXO70 encodes for a group of proteins that are involved in the formation of the exocyst complex, which is essential for the transport of secretory vesicles to the plasma membrane in eukaryotic cells [58,59]. While the role of the EXO70 family in exocytosis is well established, there is also evidence suggesting that some members of the family may be involved in lipid transport and secretion metabolism, the expression of EXO70 family (EXO70H4) was upregulated in response to glucose and that plants with mutations in the gene had reduced levels of fatty acids in Arabidopsis thaliana [58,60]. Another study found that the EXO70A1 protein in the filamentous fungus Aspergillus nidulans is involved in the regulation of lipid metabolism that mutations in the gene resulted in altered lipid composition, including a decrease in fatty acid content [58,59,60]. The specific mechanisms by which the EXO70 family members regulate rapeseed fatty acid biosynthesis are not yet fully understood, these studies suggest that they may play a role in this important metabolic process. MED34, Prm, CCNC and RNASET2 are no known direct relationship with erucic acid. EDR2 gene plays a role in regulating the plant immune system, helping it to defend against pathogen attacks [61]. EDR2 has been shown to be involved in regulating fatty acid biosynthesis in Arabidopsis thaliana, where mutations in the EDR2 gene led to increased accumulation of unsaturated fatty acids in plant tissues [62]. EDR2 acts as a negative regulator of fatty acid biosynthesis by repressing the expression of several genes involved in this process [61,62]. It is thought that EDR2 does this by interacting with other proteins involved in lipid metabolism and signaling pathways [61,62]. Further research is needed to fully understand its molecular mechanisms and potential applications in rapeseed. A total of 10 genes (PI4Kα1, ACS6, Mfrn, TAAT, LHP1, GBA2, ATL47, EMB8, CEP D1, and CHUP1) were annotated from crude fat content. PI4Kα1 is catalyzes the phosphorylation of phosphatidylinositol to produce phosphati-dylinositol 4-phosphate (PI4P) [63]. PI4Kα1 is an important signalling lipid that regulates various cellular processes, including vesicular trafficking, signal transduction, and cytoskeleton organization [63,64]. GBA2 is involved in the breakdown of a type of lipid molecule called glucosylceramide. This gene is not located in the lysosomes, which are specialized cellular compartments involved in the degradation of various macromolecules [65]. ATL47 is a type of E3 ubiquitin ligase, which has been found to play a role in regulating plant growth and development, as well as in response to regulating the activity of enzymes involved in fatty acid metabolism, such as acyl-CoA synthetases and acyl-CoA oxidases [66,67]. Moreover, some studies have reported that the overexpression of RING-H2 finger proteins, including ATL47, can lead to an increase in lipid accumulation in plant cells, suggesting a potential role in promoting fat biosynthesis [66,67]. The CEPD1 fat biosynthesis refers to the process of producing fatty acids and other types of lipids in living organisms. This process occurs downstream of the CEP (Carnitine/acylcarnitine transporter, EF-hand protein) pathway, which plays an important role in the transport of fatty acids into the mitochondria for energy production [68]. In the downstream process of fat biosynthesis, acetyl-CoA molecules are combined to form long-chain fatty acids through a series of enzymatic reactions [4,8,9,10]. ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase is not directly involved in lipid biosynthesis. However, there is some evidence to suggest that there may be a connection between carbohydrate metabolism and lipid biosynthesis as excess glucose can be converted to acetyl-CoA, which is a precursor for fatty acid synthesis, through a process called de novo lipogenesis [9,11,12]. In addition, ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase activity has been shown to be regulated by the availability of acetyl-CoA, which is an intermediate in fatty acid biosynthesis. It has been proposed that changes in acetyl-CoA levels may modulate the activity of ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase and thereby influence the synthesis of glycogen and starch [4,11,12,14]. Therefore, research on the function of ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase (Bna.A04g12270D) is important for improving our understanding of how plants produce and store lipids, as well as for developing new varieties of canola that have improved lipid profiles for use in food, biofuels, and other industrial applications. ACS6, Mfrn, CHUP1, LHP1, TAAT and EMB8 is not directly involved in chloroplastic fat biosynthesis, characterizing these genes is an important step in understanding the molecular mechanisms underlying fatty acid biosynthesis. Once their function is determined, these proteins can be targeted for the development of novel therapies for various diseases that are associated with dysregulated lipid metabolism.

5. Conclusions

In this study, we investigated four agronomic traits, eight fatty acid compositions, and crude fat content of the original rapeseed cultivar ‘Tamra’ and 95 rapeseed mutant lines, and found significant differences among each trait. Based on these results, upon performing a comprehensive GWAS using 73,226 filtered SNPs derived from GBS, we were able to identify 32 candidate genes significantly associated with the thousand seed weight, as well as three fatty acid compositions (C16:1, C20:1, and C22:1) and crude fat content. To strengthen the genetic basis of thousand seed weight, fatty acid composition, and crude fat content in rapeseed, future research could entail functional validation of the candidate genes that were identified in this study. Our results can offer valuable insights into the genetic basis of these traits and have the potential to info future rapeseed breeding strategies.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at the website of this paper posted on Preprints.org, Table S1. Results of GBS analysis of original cultivar ‘Tamra’ and 95 rapeseed mutant lines, Table S2. Summary of GBS sequence data and alignment to the reference genome sequence, Table S3. List of union SNP matrix loci that were generated for 95 rapeseed mutant lines, Table S4. Statistics of polymorphic SNPs annotation by genomic locations, Table S5. List of functional groups under the three main categories; biological process, cellular component, and molecular function, Table S6. Annotated genes list of significant associated SNPs with agronomic characteristics by association mapping in 95 rapeseed mutant lines, Table S7. Summary of chromosomes location and number of SNPs associated with thousand seed weight annotated genes, Table S8. Annotated genes list of significant associated SNPs with fatty acid compositions and crude fat by association mapping in 95 rapeseed mutant lines, Table S9. Summary of chromosomes location and number of SNPs associated with fatty acid and crude fat annotated genes.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: S.H.K., S.-Y.K., and J.-W.A.; formal analysis: B.Y., D.-G.K., S.H.K., Y.-J.L., and J.R.; investigation: W.J.K., and J.R.; writing—original draft preparation: B.Y., and J.R.; writing—review and editing: S.H.B., J.-W.A. and C.-H.B.; project administration: S.H.K.; funding acquisition: J.-W.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (RS-2022-00156231) and the research program of KAERI, Republic of Korea (Project No. 523320-23).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  1. Gilchrist, E.J.; Sidebottom, C.H.D.; Koh, C.S.; MacInnes, T.; Sharpe, A.G.; Haughn, G.W. A Mutant Brassica napus (Canola) Population for the Identification of New Genetic Diversity via TILLING and Next Generation Sequencing. PLOS ONE 2013, 8, e84303, . [CrossRef]
  2. Malek, M.A.; Ismail, M.R.; Rafii, M.Y.; Rahman, M. SyntheticBrassica napusL.: Development and Studies on Morphological Characters, Yield Attributes, and Yield. 2012, 2012, 416901. [CrossRef]
  3. Zhu, Q.; King, G.J.; Liu, X.; Shan, N.; Borpatragohain, P.; Baten, A.; Wang, P.; Luo, S.; Zhou, Q. Identification of SNP loci and candidate genes related to four important fatty acid composition in Brassica napus using genome wide association study. PLOS ONE 2019, 14, e0221578, . [CrossRef]
  4. Ryu, J.; Lyu, J.I.; Kim, D.-G.; Koo, K.M.; Yang, B.; Jo, Y.D.; Kim, S.H.; Kwon, S.-J.; Ha, B.-K.; Kang, S.-Y.; et al. Single Nucleotide Polymorphism (SNP) Discovery and Association Study of Flowering Times, Crude Fat and Fatty Acid Composition in Rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) Mutant Lines Using Genotyping-by-Sequencing (GBS). Agronomy 2021, 11, 508, . [CrossRef]
  5. Geng, X.; Dong, N.; Wang, Y.; Li, G.; Wang, L.; Guo, X.; Li, J.; Wen, Z.; Wei, W. RNA-seq transcriptome analysis of the immature seeds of two Brassica napus lines with extremely different thousand-seed weight to identify the candidate genes related to seed weight. PLOS ONE 2018, 13, e0191297, . [CrossRef]
  6. Khan, S.U.; Yangmiao, J.; Liu, S.; Zhang, K.; Khan, M.H.U.; Zhai, Y.; Olalekan, A.; Fan, C.; Zhou, Y. Genome-wide association studies in the genetic dissection of ovule number, seed number, and seed weight in Brassica napus L.. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2019, 142, 111877, . [CrossRef]
  7. Li, N.; Peng, W.; Shi, J.; Wang, X.; Liu, G.; Wang, H. The Natural Variation of Seed Weight Is Mainly Controlled by Maternal Genotype in Rapeseed (Brassica napus L.). PLOS ONE 2015, 10, e0125360. [CrossRef]
  8. Long, W.; Hu, M.; Gao, J.; Chen, S.; Zhang, J.; Cheng, L.; Pu, H. Identification and Functional Analysis of Two New Mutant BnFAD2 Alleles That Confer Elevated Oleic Acid Content in Rapeseed. Front. Genet. 2018, 9, 399, . [CrossRef]
  9. Zhang, S.; Liao, X.; Zhang, C.; Xu, H. Influences of plant density on the seed yield and oil content of winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.). Ind. Crop. Prod. 2012, 40, 27–32, . [CrossRef]
  10. Wang, P.; Xiong, X.; Zhang, X.; Wu, G.; Liu, F. A Review of Erucic Acid Production in Brassicaceae Oilseeds: Progress and Prospects for the Genetic Engineering of High and Low-Erucic Acid Rapeseeds (Brassica napus). Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 899076, . [CrossRef]
  11. Nath, U. K.; Kim, H.-T.; Khatun, K.; Park, J.-I.; Kang, K.-K.; Nou, I.-S. Modification of fatty acid profiles of rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) oil for using as food, industrial feed-stock and biodiesel. Plant Breed. Biotech. 2016, 4(2), 123-134.
  12. Sharafi, Y.; Majidi, M.M.; Goli, S.A.H.; Rashidi, F. Oil Content and Fatty Acids Composition inBrassicaSpecies. Int. J. Food Prop. 2015, 18, 2145–2154, . [CrossRef]
  13. Kim, S.H.; Ryu, J.; Kim, W.J.; Kang, R.; Seo, E.; Kim, G.; Kang, S.-Y.; Lee, J.-D.; Ha, B.-K. Identification of a new GmSACPD-C allele in high stearic acid mutant Hfa180 derived from gamma-ray irradiation. Mol. Breed. 2019, 39(2), 17.
  14. Anwar, M.M.; Ali, S.E.; Nasr, E.H. Improving the nutritional value of canola seed by gamma irradiation. J. Radiat. Res. Appl. Sci. 2015, 8, 328–333, . [CrossRef]
  15. Larik, A.S.; S. Memon.; Z.A. Soomro. Radiation induced polygenic mutations in Sorghum bicolor L. J. Agric. Res. 2009, 47, 11-19.
  16. He, J.; Zhao, X.; Laroche, A.; Lu, Z.-X.; Liu, H.K.; Li, Z. Genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS), an ultimate marker-assisted selection (MAS) tool to accelerate plant breeding. Front. Plant Sci. 2014, 5, 484, . [CrossRef]
  17. Kim, D.-G.; Lyu, J.I.; Kim, J.M.; Seo, J.S.; Choi, H.-I.; Jo, Y.D.; Kim, S.H.; Eom, S.H.; Ahn, J.-W.; Bae, C.-H.; et al. Identification of Loci Governing Agronomic Traits and Mutation Hotspots via a GBS-Based Genome-Wide Association Study in a Soybean Mutant Diversity Pool. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 10441, . [CrossRef]
  18. Glaubitz, J.C.; Casstevens, T.M.; Lu, F.; Harriman, J.; Elshire, R.J.; Sun, Q.; Buckler, E.S. TASSEL-GBS: A High Capacity Genotyping by Sequencing Analysis Pipeline. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e90346, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0090346.
  19. Kim, W.J.; Kang, B.H.; Moon, C.Y.; Kang, S.; Shin, S.; Chowdhury, S.; Jeong, S.-C.; Choi, M.-S.; Park, S.-K.; Moon, J.-K.; et al. Genome-Wide Association Study for Agronomic Traits in Wild Soybean (Glycine soja). Agronomy 2023, 13, 739, . [CrossRef]
  20. Hwang, S.-G.; Lee, S.C.; Lee, J.; Lee, J.W.; Choi, S.Y.; Kim, J.-B.; Choi, H.-I.; Jang, C.S. Resequencing of a Core Rice Mutant Population Induced by Gamma-Ray Irradiation and Its Application in a Genome-Wide Association Study. J. Plant Biol. 2020, 63, 463–472, . [CrossRef]
  21. Elshire, R.J.; Glaubitz, J.C.; Sun, Q.; Poland, J.A.; Kawamoto, K.; Buckler, E.S.; Mitchell, S.E. A Robust, Simple Genotyping-by-Sequencing (GBS) Approach for High Diversity Species. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e19379, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0019379.
  22. Martin, M. Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads. EMBnet.journal 2011, 17, pp. 10-12, . [CrossRef]
  23. Cox, M.P.; A Peterson, D.; Biggs, P.J. SolexaQA: At-a-glance quality assessment of Illumina second-generation sequencing data. BMC Bioinform. 2010, 11, 485. [CrossRef]
  24. Li, H.; Durbin, R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows—Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 2013, 25, 1754–1760, . [CrossRef]
  25. Li, H.; Handsaker, B.; Wysoker, A.; Fennell, T.; Ruan, J.; Homer, N.; Marth, G.; Abecasis, G.; Durbin, R.; 1000 Genome Project Data Processing Subgroup. The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 2009, 25, 2078–2079, . [CrossRef]
  26. Kim, J.-E.; Oh, S.-K.; Lee, J.-H.; Lee, B.-M.; Jo, S.-H. Genome-Wide SNP Calling Using Next Generation Sequencing Data in Tomato. Mol. Cells 2014, 37, 36–42, . [CrossRef]
  27. Ashburner, M.; Ball, C.A.; Blake, J.A.; Botstein, D.; Butler, H.; Cherry, J.M.; Davis, A.P.; Dolinski, K.; Dwight, S.S.; Eppig, J.T.; et al. Gene ontology: Tool for the unification of biology. Nat. Genet. 2000, 25, 25–29, doi:10.1038/75556.
  28. Bradbury, P.J.; Zhang, Z.; Kroon, D.E.; Casstevens, T.M.; Ramdoss, Y.; Buckler, E.S. TASSEL: Software for association mapping of complex traits in diverse samples. Bioinformatics 2007, 23, 2633–2635, doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btm308.
  29. Guo, Y.; Huang, Y.; Hou, L.; Ma, J.; Chen, C.; Ai, H.; Huang, L.; Ren, J. Genome-wide detection of genetic markers associated with growth and fatness in four pig populations using four approaches. Genet. Sel. Evol. 2017, 49, 21. [CrossRef]
  30. Zhou, X.; Zhang, H.; Wang, P.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, X.; Song, Y.; Wang, Z.; Ali, A.; Wan, L.; Yang, G.; et al. BnaC7.ROT3, the causal gene of cqSL-C7, mediates silique length by affecting cell elongation in Brassica napus. J. Exp. Bot. 2022, 73(1), 154-167.
  31. Kwon, D.-E.; Kim, K.-S.; Hwang, E.-J.; Park, J.-C.; Lee, J.-E.; Lee, Y.-H. Changes in growth and productivity characteristics by sowing date on spring sowing rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) in paddy field of southern region of South Korea. Korean J. Crop Sci. 2021, 66(1), 80-86.
  32. Hase, Y.; Satoh, K.; Seito, H.; Oono, Y. Genetic Consequences of Acute/Chronic Gamma and Carbon Ion Irradiation of Arabidopsis thaliana. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 336, . [CrossRef]
  33. Chung, Y.S.; Silva, R.R.; Park, M.; Lee, S. Radiation-Induced Breeding in Camelina Sativa. J. Crop. Sci. Biotechnol. 2019, 22, 17–20, . [CrossRef]
  34. Channaoui, S.; Labhilili, M.; Mouhib, M.; Mazouz, H.; El Fechtali, M.; Nabloussi, A. Development and evaluation of diverse promising rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) mutants using physical and chemical mutagens. OCL. 2019, 26, 35.
  35. Guan, M.; Shi, X.; Chen, S.; Wan, Y.; Tang, Y.; Zhao, T.; Gao, L.; Sun, F.; Yin, N.; Zhao, H.; et al. Comparative transcriptome analysis identifies candidate genes related to seed coat color in rapeseed. Front. Plant Sci. 2023, 14, 1154208, . [CrossRef]
  36. Lee, C.W.; Yoo, W.; Park, S.-H.; Le, L.T.H.L.; Jeong, C.-S.; Ryu, B.H.; Shin, S.C.; Kim, H.-W.; Park, H.; Kim, K.K.; et al. Structural and functional characterization of a novel cold-active S-formylglutathione hydrolase (SfSFGH) homolog from Shewanella frigidimarina, a psychrophilic bacterium. Microb. Cell Factories 2019, 18, 140. [CrossRef]
  37. Soriano, J.M.; Colasuonno, P.; Marcotuli, I.; Gadaleta, A. Meta-QTL analysis and identification of candidate genes for quality, abiotic and biotic stress in durum wheat. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 11877. [CrossRef]
  38. Huang, Y.; Du, L.; Wang, M.; Ren, M.; Yu, S.; Yang, Q. Multifaceted roles of zinc finger proteins in regulating various agronomic traits in rice. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 974396, . [CrossRef]
  39. Basim, H.; Basim, E.; Tombuloglu, H.; Unver, T. Comparative transcriptome analysis of resistant and cultivated tomato lines in response to Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. michiganensis. Genomics 2021, 113, 2455–2467, . [CrossRef]
  40. Li, P.-C.; Ma, J.-J.; Zhou, X.-M.; Li, G.-H.; Zhao, C.-Z.; Xia, H.; Fan, S.-J.; Wang, X.-J. Arabidopsis MDN1 Is Involved in the Establishment of a Normal Seed Proteome and Seed Germination. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 1118, . [CrossRef]
  41. Guo, C.; Yao, L.; You, C.; Wang, S.; Cui, J.; Ge, X.; Ma, H. MID1plays an important role in response to drought stress during reproductive development. Plant J. 2016, 88, 280–293, . [CrossRef]
  42. Huang, S.; Qu, X.; Zhang, R. Plant villins: versatile actin regulatory proteins: Plant villins. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2015, 57(1), 40–49.
  43. Zhang, H.; Qu, X.; Bao, C.; Khurana, P.; Wang, Q.; Xie, Y.; Zheng, Y.; Chen, N.; Blanchoin, L.; Staiger, C.J.; et al. ArabidopsisVILLIN5, an Actin Filament Bundling and Severing Protein, Is Necessary for Normal Pollen Tube Growth. Plant Cell 2010, 22, 2749–2767, . [CrossRef]
  44. Piombo, E.; Vetukuri, R.R.; Broberg, A.; Kalyandurg, P.B.; Kushwaha, S.; Jensen, D.F.; Karlsson, M.; Dubey, M. Role of Dicer-Dependent RNA Interference in Regulating Mycoparasitic Interactions. Microbiol. Spectr. 2021, 9, e0109921, . [CrossRef]
  45. Zhang, X.; Sun, J.; Cao, X.; Song, X. Epigenetic Mutation of RAV6 Affects Leaf Angle and Seed Size in Rice. Plant Physiol. 2015, 169, 2118–2128, doi:10.1104/pp.15.00836.
  46. Shimada, T.; Kunieda, T.; Sumi, S.; Koumoto, Y.; Tamura, K.; Hatano, K.; Ueda, H.; Hara-Nishimura, I. The AP-1 Complex is Required for Proper Mucilage Formation in Arabidopsis Seeds. Plant Cell Physiol. 2018, 59, 2331–2338, . [CrossRef]
  47. Shahnejat-Bushehri, S.; Tarkowska, D.; Sakuraba, Y.; Balazadeh, S. Arabidopsis NAC transcription factor JUB1 regulates GA/BR metabolism and signalling. Nat. Plants 2016, 2, 16013, . [CrossRef]
  48. Licatalosi, D. D. Roles of RNA-binding proteins and post-transcriptional regulation in driving male germ cell development in the mouse. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2016, 907, 123–151.
  49. Lou, L.; Ding, L.; Wang, T.; Xiang, Y. Emerging Roles of RNA-Binding Proteins in Seed Development and Performance. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 6822, . [CrossRef]
  50. Li, X.; Huang, W.; Yang, H.; Jiang, R.; Sun, F.; Wang, H.; Zhao, J.; Xu, C.; Tan, B. EMP18 functions in mitochondrial atp6 and cox2 transcript editing and is essential to seed development in maize. New Phytol. 2018, 221, 896–907, . [CrossRef]
  51. Scholz, P.; Anstatt, J.; Krawczyk, H.E.; Ischebeck, T. Signalling Pinpointed to the Tip: The Complex Regulatory Network That Allows Pollen Tube Growth. Plants 2020, 9, 1098, . [CrossRef]
  52. Xiang, X.; Wu, Y.; Planta, J.; Messing, J.; Leustek, T. Overexpression of serine acetyltransferase in maize leaves increases seed-specific methionine-rich zeins. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2018, 16, 1057–1067, . [CrossRef]
  53. Pal, L.; Sandhu, S.K.; Bhatia, D.; Sethi, S. Genome-wide association study for candidate genes controlling seed yield and its components in rapeseed (Brassica napus subsp. napus). Physiol. Mol. Biol. Plants 2021, 27, 1933–1951, . [CrossRef]
  54. Fujiki, Y.; Teshima, H.; Kashiwao, S.; Kawano-Kawada, M.; Ohsumi, Y.; Kakinuma, Y.; Sekito, T. Functional identification of AtAVT3, a family of vacuolar amino acid transporters, in Arabidopsis. FEBS Lett. 2017, 591, 5–15, . [CrossRef]
  55. Crisci, A.; Raleff, F.; Bagdiul, I.; Raabe, M.; Urlaub, H.; Rain, J.-C.; Kramer, A. Mammalian splicing factor SF1 interacts with SURP domains of U2 snRNP-associated proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015, 43(21), 10456–10473.
  56. Yang, Q.; Zhao, J.; Chen, D.; Wang, Y. E3 ubiquitin ligases: styles, structures and functions. Mol. Biomed. 2021, 2, 23. [CrossRef]
  57. Ando, H.; Watabe, H.; Valencia, J. C.; Yasumoto, K.-I.; Furumura, M.; Funasaka, Y.; Oka, M.; Ichihashi, M.; Hearing, V. J. Fatty acids regulate pigmentation via proteasomal degradation of tyrosinase: A new aspect of ubiquitin-proteasome function. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279(15), 15427–15433.
  58. Wang, H.; Ma, Z.-H.; Mao, J.; Chen, B.-H. Genome-wide identification and expression analysis of the EXO70 gene family in grape (Vitis vinifera L). PeerJ 2021, 9, e11176, . [CrossRef]
  59. Bao, Y.; Lopez, J.A.; James, D.E.; Hunziker, W. Snapin Interacts with the Exo70 Subunit of the Exocyst and Modulates GLUT4 Trafficking. J. Biol. Chem. 2008, 283, 324–331, . [CrossRef]
  60. Wang, S.; Crisman, L.; Miller, J.; Datta, I.; Gulbranson, D. R.; Tian, Y.; Yin, Q.; Yu, H.; Shen, J. Inducible Exoc7/Exo70 knockout reveals a critical role of the exocyst in insulin-regulated GLUT4 exocytosis. J. Biol. Chem. 2019, 294(52), 19988–19996.
  61. Vorwerk, S.; Schiff, C.; Santamaria, M.; Koh, S.; Nishimura, M.; Vogel, J.; Somerville, C.; Somerville, S. EDR2 negatively regulates salicylic acid-based defenses and cell death during powdery mildew infections of Arabidopsis thaliana. BMC Plant Biol. 2007, 7, 35. [CrossRef]
  62. Tang, D.; Ade, J.; Frye, C. A.; Innes, R. W. Regulation of plant defense responses in Arabidopsis by EDR2, a PH and START domain-containing protein: Regulation of plant defenses by EDR2. Plant J. 2005, 44(2), 245–257.
  63. Omnus, D.J.; Cadou, A.; Thomas, F.B.; Bader, J.M.; Soh, N.; Chung, G.H.C.; Vaughan, A.N.; Stefan, C.J. A heat-sensitive Osh protein controls PI4P polarity. BMC Biol. 2020, 18, 1–21, . [CrossRef]
  64. Delage, E.; Puyaubert, J.; Zachowski, A.; Ruelland, E. Signal transduction pathways involving phosphatidylinositol 4-phosphate and phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate: Convergences and divergences among eukaryotic kingdoms. Prog. Lipid Res. 2013, 52, 1–14, . [CrossRef]
  65. Massimo, A.; Maura, S.; Nicoletta, L.; Giulia, M.; Valentina, M.; Elena, C.; Alessandro, P.; Rosaria, B.; Sandro, S. Current and Novel Aspects on the Non-lysosomal β-Glucosylceramidase GBA2. Neurochem. Res. 2016, 41, 210–220, . [CrossRef]
  66. Gao, Y.; Li, H.; Deng, D.; Chen, S.; Jiang, W.; Chen, J. Characterization and expression analysis of the maize RING-H2 finger protein gene ZmXERICO responsive to plant hormones and abiotic stresses. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2012, 34, 1529–1535, . [CrossRef]
  67. Zeng, D.-E.; Hou, P.; Xiao, F.; Liu, Y. Overexpressing a novel RING-H2 finger protein gene, OsRHP1, enhances drought and salt tolerance in rice (Oryza sativa L.). J. Plant Biol. 2014, 57, 357–365, . [CrossRef]
  68. Qiu, Z.; Zhuang, K.; Liu, Y.; Ge, X.; Chen, C.; Hu, S.; Han, H. Functional characterization of C-TERMINALLY ENCODED PEPTIDE (CEP) family in Brassica rapa L. Plant Signal. Behav. 2022, 17, 2021365, . [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The development of mutant lines. Mutations were derived by irradiating 700 Gy of gamma rays to Korean rapeseed ‘Tamra’, and 95 rapeseed mutant lines with changes in fatty acid compositions, crude fat contents, and seed yield were identified from M5 to M8 populations. This mutant line was homozygous from the M5 to the M8–9 generations.
Figure 1. The development of mutant lines. Mutations were derived by irradiating 700 Gy of gamma rays to Korean rapeseed ‘Tamra’, and 95 rapeseed mutant lines with changes in fatty acid compositions, crude fat contents, and seed yield were identified from M5 to M8 populations. This mutant line was homozygous from the M5 to the M8–9 generations.
Preprints 71933 g001
Figure 2. Chromosomal distribution of the 182,257 union SNPs from GBS in gamma-irradiated rapeseed mutant lines.
Figure 2. Chromosomal distribution of the 182,257 union SNPs from GBS in gamma-irradiated rapeseed mutant lines.
Preprints 71933 g002
Figure 3. Histogram of GO terms of union SNPs in rapeseed mutant lines.
Figure 3. Histogram of GO terms of union SNPs in rapeseed mutant lines.
Preprints 71933 g003
Figure 4. Manhattan plots and quantile-quantile (QQ) plots for agronomic traits (TSW) in original cultivar ‘Tamra’ and 95 rapeseed mutant lines. In the Mahattan plots, the blue line indicates the genome-wide threshold –log10(p) = 4.864, calculated using the Bonferroni method. TSW, thousand seed weight.
Figure 4. Manhattan plots and quantile-quantile (QQ) plots for agronomic traits (TSW) in original cultivar ‘Tamra’ and 95 rapeseed mutant lines. In the Mahattan plots, the blue line indicates the genome-wide threshold –log10(p) = 4.864, calculated using the Bonferroni method. TSW, thousand seed weight.
Preprints 71933 g004
Figure 5. Manhattan plots and quantile-quantile (QQ) plots for 3 fatty acid and crude fat in original cultivar ‘Tamra’ and 95 rapeseed mutant lines. In the Mahattan plots, the blue line indicates the genome-wide threshold –log10(p) = 4.864, calculated using the Bonferroni method. C16:0, palmitic acid; C20:1, eicosenoic acid; C22:1, erucic acid.
Figure 5. Manhattan plots and quantile-quantile (QQ) plots for 3 fatty acid and crude fat in original cultivar ‘Tamra’ and 95 rapeseed mutant lines. In the Mahattan plots, the blue line indicates the genome-wide threshold –log10(p) = 4.864, calculated using the Bonferroni method. C16:0, palmitic acid; C20:1, eicosenoic acid; C22:1, erucic acid.
Preprints 71933 g005
Table 1. Agronomic characteristics of the original cultivar ‘Tamra’ and 95 rapeseed mutant lines.
Table 1. Agronomic characteristics of the original cultivar ‘Tamra’ and 95 rapeseed mutant lines.
Lines Plant height (cm) Ear length (cm) TSWa (g) Seed yield (kg/10a)
Tamra 163.5 ± 3.50 55.5 ± 9.50 3.8 ± 0.17 309.4 ± 17.46
Tr1 160.5 ± 3.00 54.5 ± 7.50 3.7 ± 0.12 346.1 ± 24.43
Tr1-1 151.0 ± 2.00 50.5 ± 9.50 4.0 ± 0.12 303.0 ± 13.60
Tr1-2 153.5 ± 1.50 49.0 ± 9.00 4.0 ± 0.06 254.0 ± 7.17
Tr2-late 159.5 ± 3.50 50.0 ± 8.00 5.0 ± 0.15 342.0 ± 4.27
Tr2-1 158.0 ± 5.00 57.5 ± 4.50 3.7 ± 0.06 374.0 ± 23.51
Tr2-2 134.0 ± 9.54 56.0 ± 7.00 4.0 ± 0.06 290.0 ± 8.62
Tr2-3 171.0 ± 15.39 62.5 ± 7.50 4.0 ± 0.15 377.0 ± 11.60
Tr3 162.0 ± 5.57 57.0 ± 8.00 3.5 ± 0.06 384.0 ± 6.99
Tr4 151.0 ± 2.00 56.0 ± 9.00 3.7 ± 0.15 238.0 ± 11.92
Tr4-2 160.0 ± 2.00 58.5 ± 7.50 3.9 ± 0.10 393.0 ± 9.13
Tr5 147.7 ± 9.07 62.0 ± 10.00 3.9 ± 0.12 151.0 ± 25.88
Tr5-1 154.0 ± 5.00 59.0 ± 9.00 4.0 ± 0.00 369.0 ± 5.83
Tr5-3 155.3 ± 13.05 58.5 ± 10.50 4.0 ± 0.12 353.0 ± 8.94
Tr6 158.0 ± 3.61 53.0 ± 10.00 4.3 ± 0.12 393.0 ± 8.12
Tr7 157.0 ± 1.00 52.5 ± 6.50 4.1 ± 0.06 395.0 ± 39.89
Tr14-6 161.0 ± 4.00 57.0 ± 3.00 4.1 ± 0.06 368.7 ± 30.21
Tr14-8 167.3 ± 5.51 59.0 ± 8.00 3.9 ± 0.10 378.0 ± 5.29
Tr14-9 161.0 ± 2.00 58.5 ± 10.50 4.6 ± 0.15 350.0 ± 8.26
Tr14-10 163.7 ± 7.37 61.5 ± 8.50 4.3 ± 0.06 329.0 ± 22.38
Tr14-11 150.0 ± 5.29 52.5 ± 3.50 4.3 ± 0.10 341.0 ± 4.77
Tr14-13 158.0 ± 2.00 59.0 ± 7.00 3.9 ± 0.06 382.0 ± 2.35
Tr14-16 162.7 ± 10.07 63.5 ± 5.50 5.2 ± 0.06 384.0 ± 8.49
Tr14-20 151.0 ± 4.00 58.0 ± 11.00 4.3 ± 0.15 316.0 ± 13.07
Tr18-4 159.0 ± 6.00 60.0 ± 8.00 4.2 ± 0.06 381.0 ± 3.33
Tr18-5 170.5 ± 4.50 72.5 ± 11.50 4.3 ± 0.06 397.0 ± 4.96
Tr18-7 163.3 ± 13.32 59.0 ± 8.00 4.1 ± 0.06 379.3 ± 3.25
Tr25-5 142.3 ± 3.21 51.5 ± 3.50 5.1 ± 0.10 243.0 ± 5.02
Tr25-6 159.0 ± 1.00 60.0 ± 0.00 4.4 ± 0.06 226.0 ± 9.20
Tr25-7 143.3 ± 1.53 48.0 ± 4.00 3.9 ± 0.06 231.0 ± 6.76
Tr25-9 153.5 ± 2.50 71.0 ± 11.00 4.2 ± 0.06 226.0 ± 13.16
Tr25-10 160.0 ± 1.50 59.0 ± 12.00 4.5 ± 0.10 274.0 ± 7.16
Tr25-11 160.0 ± 1.00 63.0 ± 0.00 3.8 ± 0.15 371.0 ± 9.38
Tr25-12 146.5 ± 1.50 55.5 ± 10.50 3.7 ± 0.10 215.0 ± 10.86
Tr25-14 175.0 ± 4.00 57.5 ± 7.50 4.4 ± 0.12 378.0 ± 17.22
Tr25-16 143.5 ± 2.50 55.5 ± 7.50 3.6 ± 0.12 226.0 ± 12.90
Tr38-4 157.5 ± 2.50 77.0 ± 15.00 4.1 ± 0.06 398.0 ± 8.32
Tr38-7 160.5 ± 5.50 77.5 ± 18.00 4.0 ± 0.06 377.0 ± 3.58
Tr38-9 164.0 ± 4.00 60.5 ± 10.50 3.6 ± 0.06 392.0 ± 7.20
Tr38-16 147.7 ± 0.58 49.0 ± 7.00 4.1 ± 0.06 387.0 ± 50.84
Tr38-17 148.0 ± 1.00 65.0 ± 4.00 3.7 ± 0.12 391.0 ± 28.98
Tr65-7 151.0 ± 4.00 63.5 ± 6.50 4.1 ± 0.06 233.0 ± 59.31
Tr65-9 164.0 ± 5.57 61.0 ± 10.00 3.7 ± 0.06 284.0 ± 10.60
Tr65-10 170.0 ± 2.00 75.5 ± 15.50 4.5 ± 0.06 397.0 ± 21.53
Tr65-11 148.0 ± 1.00 62.0 ± 8.00 4.3 ± 0.06 333.0 ± 7.67
Tr138-L 170.0 ± 2.00 45.0 ± 10.00 2.8 ± 0.10 234.0 ± 15.34
Tr138-8 163.0 ± 2.00 61.0 ± 11.00 4.0 ± 0.06 388.0 ± 16.51
Tr138-9 148.0 ± 1.00 61.0 ± 9.00 4.3 ± 0.15 198.0 ± 7.62
Tr138-10 160.3 ± 0.58 61.5 ± 7.50 4.4 ± 0.06 269.0 ± 11.08
Tr138-11 148.3 ± 4.73 56.0 ± 8.00 4.1 ± 0.15 197.0 ± 10.79
Tr138-12 151.0 ± 2.00 66.0 ± 8.00 3.8 ± 0.06 222.0 ± 4.28
Tr138-13 158.0 ± 4.00 63.5 ± 5.50 4.0 ± 0.15 382.0 ± 10.15
Tr138-14 164.0 ± 2.00 67.5 ± 7.50 4.0 ± 0.06 215.0 ± 9.98
Tr138-15 160.0 ± 1.00 66.0 ± 11.00 4.0 ± 0.10 380.0 ± 11.52
Tr138-18 148.0 ± 3.00 58.0 ± 7.00 4.2 ± 0.06 384.0 ± 7.26
Tr138-19 156.0 ± 3.00 64.0 ± 9.00 4.4 ± 0.12 376.0 ± 10.34
Tr138-20 162.0 ± 1.00 66.5 ± 9.50 4.5 ± 0.06 281.0 ± 11.12
Tr138-21 155.0 ± 11.36 51.0 ± 11.00 4.3 ± 0.10 204.0 ± 5.86
Tr138-22 157.0 ± 1.53 67.0 ± 7.00 2.9 ± 0.06 179.0 ± 10.36
Tr138-23 160.0 ± 1.50 61.0 ± 8.00 3.9 ± 0.06 236.0 ± 7.02
Tr6-1-1 160.0 ± 2.00 69.0 ± 9.00 4.1 ± 0.06 313.0 ± 5.15
Tr6-1-2 173.7 ± 9.07 63.0 ± 7.00 4.1 ± 0.06 376.0 ± 8.93
Tr6-1-3 154.0 ± 12.00 62.0 ± 6.00 4.7 ± 0.10 184.0 ± 16.96
Tr6-1-4 166.0 ± 2.00 61.0 ± 8.00 3.8 ± 0.06 380.0 ± 11.52
Tr6-11-1 160.0 ± 3.00 64.5 ± 5.50 5.4 ± 0.06 221.0 ± 3.37
Tr8-3-1 152.0 ± 2.50 35.0 ± 7.00 4.3 ± 0.06 230.0 ± 28.17
Tr8-3-2 150.5 ± 7.50 60.5 ± 2.50 4.3 ± 0.06 383.0 ± 16.97
Tr8-3-3 153.0 ± 7.00 61.5 ± 8.50 4.0 ± 0.10 278.0 ± 11.08
Tr8-5-1 160.0 ± 1.00 60.0 ± 6.00 4.0 ± 0.10 337.0 ± 11.35
Tr8-7-1 150.5 ± 0.50 61.0 ± 7.00 4.9 ± 0.06 156.0 ± 25.26
Tr14-1 161.0 ± 3.00 65.0 ± 6.00 5.1 ± 0.06 392.0 ± 10.96
Tr14-1-1 157.0 ± 2.00 66.0 ± 6.00 4.8 ± 0.10 393.0 ± 14.28
Tr14-1-3 155.0 ± 1.00 58.5 ± 6.50 4.8 ± 0.06 307.0 ± 19.34
Tr14-2 150.0 ± 3.00 64.5 ± 6.50 4.4 ± 0.06 198.0 ± 16.66
Tr14-3 174.0 ± 9.00 61.0 ± 12.00 4.3 ± 0.06 144.0 ± 21.58
Tr14-4 159.0 ± 1.00 57.0 ± 7.00 4.3 ± 0.06 392.0 ± 15.36
Tr14-5 164.0 ± 2.00 58.0 ± 8.00 3.7 ± 0.12 327.0 ± 8.19
Tr18-1 151.0 ± 0.00 61.5 ± 7.50 3.8 ± 0.06 228.0 ± 4.29
Tr18-2 148.5 ± 1.50 64.5 ± 7.50 5.2 ± 0.06 245.0 ± 10.15
Tr25-1 155.0 ± 3.00 57.0 ± 6.00 4.8 ± 0.06 188.0 ± 12.88
Tr25-2 160.0 ± 0.50 57.5 ± 8.50 5.2 ± 0.06 224.0 ± 5.89
Tr25-3 170.0 ± 2.00 57.5 ± 9.50 4.2 ± 0.06 395.0 ± 6.33
Tr38-1 141.0 ± 8.19 58.0 ± 8.00 5.0 ± 0.06 181.0 ± 14.14
Tr38-2 158.0 ± 3.00 55.0 ± 8.00 3.7 ± 0.06 168.0 ± 4.46
Tr65-1 166.5 ± 1.50 62.0 ± 6.00 4.0 ± 0.06 397.0 ± 13.16
Tr65-2 159.0 ± 1.00 54.0 ± 5.00 4.1 ± 0.06 259.0 ± 23.92
Tr138-1 163.0 ± 4.00 57.5 ± 7.50 4.3 ± 0.10 145.0 ± 13.84
Tr138-2 160.5 ± 0.50 62.0 ± 9.00 3.7 ± 0.12 346.0 ± 16.60
Tr138-3 157.5 ± 1.50 59.0 ± 7.00 4.6 ± 0.10 393.0 ± 19.62
Tr138-4 164.5 ± 4.50 59.5 ± 8.50 4.2 ± 0.06 373.7 ± 3.57
Tr6-1 160.0 ± 2.00 66.0 ± 7.00 4.3 ± 0.15 377.0 ± 7.40
Tr6-3 162.0 ± 2.00 63.0 ± 7.00 4.2 ± 0.06 344.0 ± 13.80
Tr6-4 169.5 ± 3.50 58.0 ± 8.00 5.3 ± 0.10 377.0 ± 10.38
Tr6-5 159.5 ± 3.50 56.5 ± 7.50 4.2 ± 0.12 393.0 ± 33.24
Tr8-1 158.5 ± 8.50 60.5 ± 8.50 4.2 ± 0.00 228.0 ± 42.92
Tr8-3 157.0 ± 3.00 60.5 ± 10.50 3.5 ± 0.06 188.0 ± 21.51
aTSW: thousand seed weight.
Table 2. Crude fat content and fatty acid compositions of the original cultivar ‘Tamra’ and 95 rapeseed mutant lines used in this study.
Table 2. Crude fat content and fatty acid compositions of the original cultivar ‘Tamra’ and 95 rapeseed mutant lines used in this study.
Lines Crude fat content
(mg/100 g)
Fatty acid composition (%)
C16:0 C16:1 C18:0 C18:1 C18:2 C18:3 C20:1 C22:1
Tamra 40.16 ± 1.25* 5.5 ± 0.54 0.0 ± 0.00 1.9 ± 0.06 65.5 ± 1.80 20.5 ± 1.10 5.6 ± 0.38 1.0 ± 0.15 0.0 ± 0.00
Tr1 37.55 ± 2.13 2.3 ± 0.72 0.0 ± 0.00 0.5 ± 0.07 53.8 ± 0.80 9.5 ± 1.85 5.8 ± 0.65 11.5 ± 0.40 16.6 ± 4.49
Tr1-1 34.76 ± 0.69 2.1 ± 0.41 0.0 ± 0.00 0.6 ± 0.05 55.9 ± 4.26 7.9 ± 0.59 5.3 ± 0.00 10.8 ± 0.25 17.4 ± 5.04
Tr1-2 36.72 ± 0.13 2.4 ± 0.40 0.0 ± 0.00 0.6 ± 0.03 54.9 ± 2.64 16.6 ± 0.92 5.7 ± 0.11 8.4 ± 0.30 11.5 ± 3.59
Tr2-late 38.66 ± 0.49 3.0 ± 0.57 0.2 ± 0.02 1.1 ± 0.04 72.9 ± 0.81 11.0 ± 0.75 3.0 ± 0.05 5.6 ± 0.09 3.1 ± 0.43
Tr2-1 38.29 ± 1.93 3.5 ± 0.38 0.0 ± 0.00 1.4 ± 0.02 69.5 ± 1.05 11.4 ± 0.10 3.6 ± 0.31 6.6 ± 0.42 4.0 ± 0.62
Tr2-2 39.50 ± 2.99 9.00 ± 0.88 0.0 ± 0.00 1.1 ± 0.01 55.0 ± 0.76 21.8 ± 1.16 5.4 ± 0.41 4.5 ± 0.71 3.2 ± 0.99
Tr2-3 35.18 ± 1.39 9.0 ± 0.81 0.0 ± 0.00 1.0 ± 0.11 55.1 ± 1.08 22.0 ± 1.41 5.3 ± 0.38 4.2 ± 0.63 3.4 ± 0.99
Tr3 38.01 ± 0.63 2.5 ± 0.37 0.0 ± 0.00 0.5 ± 0.02 78.7 ± 0.15 12.0 ± 0.17 5.0 ± 0.35 1.0 ± 0.02 0.4 ± 0.04
Tr4 35.6 ± 1.16 2.2 ± 0.12 0.0 ± 0.00 0.5 ± 0.06 81.7 ± 3.13 10.5 ± 1.78 4.3 ± 1.06 0.7 ± 0.11 0.0 ± 0.00
Tr4-2 39.20 ± 2.72 3.8 ± 0.65 0.0 ± 0.00 1.2 ± 0.01 69.7 ± 1.32 17.2 ± 0.45 7.2 ± 0.15 1.0 ± 0.07 0.0 ± 0.14
Tr5 38.61 ± 1.12 2.4 ± 0.30 0.0 ± 0.00 0.4 ± 0.00 79.4 ± 0.43 13.8 ± 0.40 3.3 ± 0.32 0.7 ± 0.00 0.2 ± 0.02
Tr5-1 40.41 ± 2.37 0.9 ± 0.13 0.0 ± 0.00 0.2 ± 0.03 74.4 ± 0.22 19.7 ± 0.17 4.3 ± 0.12 0.6 ± 0.02 0.0 ± 0.00
Tr5-3 39.03 ± 1.42 10.2 ± 2.72 0.8 ± 0.25 2.9 ± 0.36 42.3 ± 7.53 29.1 ± 2.98 13.7 ± 0.08 0.8 ± 1.17 0.3 ± 0.01
Tr6 38.79 ± 2.01 2.1 ± 0.37 0.0 ± 0.00 0.4 ± 0.05 40.6 ± 1.75 23.5 ± 1.65 7.6 ± 0.11 8.5 ± 0.22 17.3 ± 3.70
Tr7 37.80 ± 3.33 2.7 ± 0.42 0.0 ± 0.00 0.4 ± 0.01 78.7 ± 0.38 13.2 ± 0.22 3.8 ± 0.25 0.9 ± 0.01 0.3 ± 0.04
Tr14-6 35.35 ± 1.35 4.4f ± 0.43 0.2 ± 0.04 2.7 ± 0.08 67.5 ± 1.49 17.3 ± 0.81 7.0 ± 0.44 1.0 ± 0.15 0.0 ± 0.00
Tr14-8 40.29 ± 1.16 4.5 ± 0.52 0.2 ± 0.05 2.7 ± 0.07 66.3 ± 1.65 17.4 ± 0.85 7.2 ± 0.12 0.6 ± 0.54 1.1 ± 0.13
Tr14-9 40.53 ± 2.25 5.0 ± 0.53 0.3 ± 0.06 1.6 ± 0.04 64.6 ± 1.82 19.8 ± 0.94 7.5 ± 0.51 1.2 ± 0.17 0.0 ± 0.00
Tr14-10 38.95 ± 2.76 4.2 ± 0.46 0.2 ± 0.05 2.7 ± 0.01 67.4 ± 1.51 16.8 ± 0.73 7.2 ± 0.09 0.6 ± 0.50 1.0 ± 0.15
Tr14-11 39.40 ± 1.17 4.5 ± 0.42 0.0 ± 0.00 1.9 ± 0.12 68.4 ± 1.08 18.1 ± 0.54 6.3 ± 0.36 0.9 ± 0.11 0.0 ± 0.00
Tr14-13 38.25 ± 2.19 5.7 ± 0.59 0.0 ± 0.00 1.9 ± 0.00 65.3 ± 1.62 20.6 ± 0.79 5.6 ± 0.37 0.9 ± 0.12 0.0 ± 0.00
Tr14-16 36.99 ± 1.11 4.5 ± 0.47 0.0 ± 0.00 1.8 ± 0.04 67.9 ± 1.17 18.0 ± 0.62 0.4 ± 0.08 6.4 ± 0.35 1.0 ± 0.14
Tr14-20 40.93 ± 1.78 5.8 ± 0.57 0.2 ± 0.06 2.1 ± 0.07 64.6 ± 1.72 20.7 ± 0.92 5.7 ± 0.39 1.0 ± 0.15 0.0 ± 0.00
Tr18-4 38.43 ± 0.47 4.2 ± 0.42 0.3 ± 0.06 1.7 ± 0.07 66.2 ± 1.60 18.7 ± 0.86 7.7 ± 0.53 1.2 ± 0.19 0.0 ± 0.00
Tr18-5 39.42 ± 1.93 4.2f ± 0.43 0.3 ± 0.07 1.6 ± 0.00 66.9 ± 1.57 18.3 ± 0.77 7.7 ± 0.45 1.1 ± 0.14 0.0 ± 0.00
Tr18-7 39.55 ± 1.45 9.2 ± 1.82 0.3 ± 0.11 2.3 ± 0.21 60.2 ± 3.50 20.9 ± 1.23 6.6 ± 0.12 0.5 ± 0.01 0.0 ± 0.00
Tr25-5 40.14 ± 1.98 5.9 ± 1.13 0.2 ± 0.07 2.3 ± 0.18 64.3 ± 3.04 16.5 ± 0.95 8.4 ± 0.84 2.0 ± 0.04 0.4 ± 0.08
Tr25-6 40.31 ± 0.52 6.4 ± 0.96 0.2 ± 0.07 2.2 ± 0.06 53.9 ± 2.35 24.9 ± 0.44 10.7 ± 0.81 1.6 ± 0.02 0.0 ± 0.00
Tr25-7 40.10 ± 1.28 9.0b ± 2.27 0.3 ± 0.12 3.7 ± 0.46 40.6 ± 5.32 31.2 ± 0.70 10.7 ± 1.68 3.2 ± 0.26 1.2 ± 0.18
Tr25-9 39.96 ± 0.47 10.3 ± 2.47 0.4 ± 0.14 3.8 ± 0.48 39.9 ± 7.03 26.9 ± 1.60 14.7 ± 2.06 3.2 ± 0.40 0.8 ± 0.11
Tr25-10 40.28 ± 1.24 3.6 ± 0.36 0.1 ± 0.03 1.5 ± 0.01 70.7 ± 1.32 15.3 ± 0.63 7.6 ± 0.48 1.2 ± 0.16 0.0 ± 0.00
Tr25-11 37.92 ± 0.65 8.1 ± 1.25 0.2 ± 0.08 2.5 ± 0.11 52.8 ± 2.70 23.1 ± 0.41 11.1 ± 0.84 2.2 ± 0.01 0.0 ± 0.00
Tr25-12 37.81 ± 1.24 8.5 ± 1.64 0.5 ± 0.07 3.3 ± 0.17 48.0 ± 0.48 28.2 ± 1.34 11.5 ± 0.06 0.0 ± 0.00 0.0 ± 0.00
Tr25-14 39.34 ± 1.04 5.6 ± 0.97 0.2 ± 0.06 1.8 ± 0.13 67.1 ± 2.60 16.2 ± 0.90 7.4 ± 0.67 1.5 ± 0.06 0.3 ± 0.07
Tr25-16 37.86 ± 1.19 9.0 ± 1.21 0.3 ± 0.09 4.4 ± 0.11 48.6 ± 0.11 24.7 ± 1.36 10.8 ± 0.19 2.2 ± 0.09 0.0 ± 0.00
Tr38-4 38.36 ± 1.93 8.5 ± 1.20 0.0 ± 0.00 3.7 ± 0.04 49.6 ± 0.87 26.2 ± 0.72 10.13 ± 0.45 1.9 ± 0.01 0.0 ± 0.00
Tr38-7 35.47 ± 1.31 7.3 ± 0.57 0.0 ± 0.00 2.0 ± 0.08 66.4 ± 1.54 19.0 ± 0.68 5.3 ± 0.38 0.0 ± 0.00 0.0 ± 0.00
Tr38-9 36.86 ± 1.92 6.3 ± 0.66 0.0 ± 0.00 2.0 ± 0.08 66.1 ± 1.72 18.7 ± 0.94 5.8 ± 0.41 1.2 ± 0.22 0.0 ± 0.00
Tr38-16 39.56 ± 0.07 7.6 ± 0.25 0.7 ± 0.10 1.5 ± 0.08 60.4 ± 1.62 25.1 ± 0.97 4.7 ± 0.38 0.0 ± 0.00 0.0 ± 0.00
Tr38-17 40.19 ± 2.04 7.4 ± 0.58 0.0 ± 0.00 1.4 ± 0.04 64.3 ± 2.06 22.0 ± 1.03 5.0 ± 0.40 0.0 ± 0.00 0.0 ± 0.00
Tr65-7 38.90 ± 0.54 8.3 ± 0.66 0.0 ± 0.00 1.4 ± 0.08 66.2 ± 1.97 20.1 ± 0.86 4.0 ± 0.37 0.0 ± 0.00 0.0 ± 0.00
Tr65-9 38.15 ± 0.50 7.4 ± 0.59 0.0 ± 0.00 2.1 ± 0.17 66.1 ± 1.64 19.1 ± 0.86 5.3 ± 0.35 0.0 ± 0.00 0.0 ± 0.00
Tr65-10 40.21 ± 1.67 7.3 ± 0.55 0.6 ± 0.05 1.6 ± 0.05 63.8 ± 1.58 21.7 ± 0.82 5.0 ± 0.32 0.0 ± 0.00 0.0 ± 0.00
Tr65-11 38.07 ± 0.70 7.2 ± 0.59 0.2 ± 0.04 1.3 ± 0.02 60.4 ± 1.56 25.3 ± 0.81 5.0 ± 0.23 0.7 ± 0.12 0.0 ± 0.00
Tr138-L 39.13 ± 0.14 5.9 ± 0.47 0.3 ± 0.14 1.9 ± 0.06 68.3 ± 1.41 17.6 ± 0.67 5.3 ± 0.32 0.8 ± 0.12 0.0 ± 0.00
Tr138-8 39.24 ± 1.32 4.2 ± 0.42 0.0 ± 0.00 1.7 ± 0.02 68.1 ± 1.39 17.4 ± 0.54 7.8 ± 0.55 0.9 ± 0.10 0.0 ± 0.00
Tr138-9 39.08 ± 1.29 4.1 ± 0.41 0.0 ± 0.00 1.6 ± 0.02 67.9 ± 1.40 17.6 ± 0.68 7.8 ± 0.49 1.0 ± 0.17 0.0 ± 0.00
Tr138-10 39.95 ± 2.43 5.2 ± 0.64 0.2 ± 0.05 1.9 ± 0.02 62.3 ± 2.25 22.1 ± 1.15 7.3 ± 0.53 1.0 ± 0.09 0.0 ± 0.00
Tr138-11 39.42 ± 1.50 8.0 ± 0.68 0.2 ± 0.08 1.8 ± 0.02 60.6 ± 2.01 23.7 ± 0.99 5.1 ± 0.32 0.6 ± 0.03 0.0 ± 0.00
Tr138-12 39.82 ± 0.66 8.1 ± 0.64 0.0 ± 0.00 1.9 ± 0.11 61.0 ± 1.63 23.4 ± 0.87 5.0 ± 0.29 0.7 ± 0.06 0.0 ± 0.00
Tr138-13 40.26 ± 1.16 7.0 ± 0.65 0.0 ± 0.00 1.8 ± 0.06 51.3 ± 0.27 21.0 ± 1.71 5.5 ± 0.56 8.3 ± 1.26 5.3 ± 1.88
Tr138-14 39.51 ± 0.55 5.1 ± 0.79 0.2 ± 0.05 1.7 ± 0.09 62.7 ± 2.52 20.6 ± 0.96 8.4 ± 0.71 1.3 ± 0.08 0.0 ± 0.00
Tr138-15 39.15 ± 0.97 8.9 ± 2.25 0.3 ± 0.12 3.7 ± 0.46 38.6 ± 6.95 33.5 ± 2.37 10.6 ± 1.67 3.2 ± 0.27 1.2 ± 0.18
Tr138-18 40.19 ± 0.28 5.9 ± 1.01 0.3 ± 0.07 2.2 ± 0.12 60.1 ± 2.92 22.6 ± 1.00 7.8 ± 0.73 1.1 ± 0.01 0.0 ± 0.00
Tr138-19 38.07 ± 1.38 6.2 ± 2.02 0.0 ± 0.00 1.4 ± 0.81 58.8 ± 6.43 21.7 ± 1.67 10.5 ± 1.67 1.4 ± 0.27 0.0 ± 0.00
Tr138-20 39.35 ± 1.90 4.3 ± 0.40 0.1 ± 0.04 2.0 ± 0.06 69.2 ± 1.30 16.4 ± 0.65 7.0 ± 0.46 1.1 ± 0.18 0.0 ± 0.00
Tr138-21 38.87 ± 1.31 6.9 ± 0.84 0.0 ± 0.00 1.3 ± 0.03 44.5 ± 0.44 24.7 ± 1.74 6.8 ± 0.61 7.3 ± 1.10 8.6 ± 2.55
Tr138-22 36.65 ± 1.63 5.6 ± 1.11 0.2 ± 0.07 2.5 ± 0.19 60.9 ± 3.08 21.6 ± 1.23 6.5 ± 0.68 2.0 ± 0.06 0.8 ± 0.15
Tr138-23 36.50 ± 0.98 6.8 ± 0.73 0.0 ± 0.00 1.5 ± 0.02 50.4 ± 0.41 21.5 ± 1.67 5.5 ± 0.51 8.8 ± 1.37 5.7 ± 1.93
Tr6-1-1 38.55 ± 0.55 3.5 ± 1.34 0.1 ± 0.04 0.6 ± 0.10 68.8 ± 6.87 21.2 ± 4.35 5.0 ± 0.85 0.6 ± 0.19 0.2 ± 0.00
Tr6-1-2 38.56 ± 0.67 4.0 ± 0.38 0.0 ± 0.00 0.9 ± 0.06 44.5 ± 2.18 20.3 ± 0.12 8.1 ± 0.58 10.0 ± 0.39 12.3 ± 1.77
Tr6-1-3 39.24 ± 1.13 4.0 ± 1.52 0.1 ± 0.04 0.5 ± 0.10 54.8 ± 6.51 17.7 ± 3.08 8.9 ± 1.30 8.8 ± 1.12 5.2 ± 0.65
Tr6-1-4 36.20 ± 1.05 3.1 ± 0.34 0.0 ± 0.00 0.9 ± 0.05 53.5 ± 2.53 15.8 ± 0.00 7.2 ± 0.46 8.6 ± 0.44 11.0 ± 2.03
Tr6-11-1 38.63 ± 0.15 3.2 ± 0.93 0.1 ± 0.04 0.8 ± 0.09 64.2 ± 4.71 24.9 ± 2.95 5.2 ± 0.51 1.1 ± 0.18 0.5 ± 0.01
Tr8-3-1 38.60 ± 1.36 3.5 ± 1.26 0.1 ± 0.04 0.8 ± 0.13 70.4 ± 6.50 19.0 ± 4.00 5.0 ± 0.85 1.0 ± 0.25 0.3 ± 0.02
Tr8-3-2 38.29 ± 1.42 3.0 ± 1.06 0.1 ± 0.04 0.8 ± 0.13 69.4 ± 6.14 19.2 ± 3.70 6.4 ± 0.99 0.8 ± 0.24 0.3 ± 0.01
Tr8-3-3 39.70 ± 1.92 3.1 ± 0.87 0.0 ± 0.07 0.6 ± 0.06 47.3 ± ±2.09 20.9 ± 0.56 7.7 ± 0.41 10.0 ± 0.02 10.4 ± 1.84
Tr8-5-1 40.98 ± 1.98 3.5 ± 1.30 0.1 ± 0.04 0.7 ± 0.09 59.2 ± 7.55 18.5 ± 3.51 8.6 ± 1.41 6.5 ± 1.30 2.8 ± 0.10
Tr8-7-1 38.19 ± 0.91 3.0 ± 0.51 0.0 ± 0.00 0.7 ± 0.06 50.4 ± 0.06 20.1 ± 1.12 7.3 ± 0.07 8.7 ± 0.09 9.9 ± 1.77
Tr14-1 34.99 ± 1.51 5.0 ± 0.94 0.0 ± 0.00 1.7 ± 0.11 32.4 ± 2.24 15.3 ± 2.16 8.9 ± 1.52 13.1 ± 1.23 23.6 ± 5.74
Tr14-1-1 36.93 ± 1.07 8.9 ± 1.80 0.7 ± 0.17 2.5 ± 0.20 50.1 ± 3.16 25.3 ± 0.77 12.0 ± 0.02 0.7 ± 0.20 0.0 ± 0.00
Tr14-1-3 38.23 ± 0.16 10.5 ± 1.06 0.5 ± 0.07 2.7 ± 0.10 53.6 ± 0.50 24.4 ± 0.85 7.7 ± 0.63 0.6 ± 0.06 0.0 ± 0.00
Tr14-2 29.68 ± 3.07 3.9 ± 0.60 0.0 ± 0.00 1.8 ± 0.05 42.9 ± 1.86 17.5 ± 1.82 7.9 ± 1.01 12.0 ± 1.30 14.1 ± 4.03
Tr14-3 28.83 ± 1.85 4.5 ± 0.73 0.0 ± 0.00 1.5 ± 0.07 41.2 ± 2.39 16.8 ± 2.04 6.3 ± 0.84 13.0 ± 1.39 16.7 ± 4.67
Tr14-4 33.35 ± 0.75 6.4 ± 1.61 0.0 ± 0.00 0.9 ± 0.29 60.7 ± 5.17 18.7 ± 2.09 10.2 ± 1.39 1.4 ± 0.20 1.7 ± 0.01
Tr14-5 24.07 ± 0.49 1.4 ± 0.37 0.0 ± 0.00 0.3 ± 0.04 32.8 ± 2.45 17.6 ± 2.34 7.2 ± 3.97 11.7 ± 2.68 29.0 ± 10.02
Tr18-1 39.29 ± 0.95 4.8 ± 1.05 0.2 ± 0.02 1.0 ± 0.07 66.5 ± 3.01 21.9 ± 1.57 5.1 ± 0.32 0.7 ± 0.01 0.0 ± 0.00
Tr18-2 21.31 ± 0.75 6.0 ± 0.30 0.4 ± 0.07 1.8 ± 0.20 66.3 ± 1.19 18.2 ± 0.79 6.2 ± 0.33 1.0 ± 0.11 0.0 ± 0.00
Tr25-1 24.06 ± 0.95 7.1 ± 0.78 0.0 ± 0.00 1.2 ± 0.06 44.7 ± 0.32 24.9 ± 1.83 6.9 ± 0.63 7.1 ± 1.08 8.2 ± 2.54
Tr25-2 26.76 ± 0.83 6.6 ± 1.65 0.0 ± 0.00 2.3 ± 0.97 62.7 ± 6.00 18.6 ± 2.16 8.5 ± 1.30 1.4 ± 0.07 0.0 ± 0.00
Tr25-3 28.60 ± 1.00 5.7 ± 0.58 0.3 ± 0.07 2.0 ± 0.05 68.2 ± 0.05 16.6 ± 1.75 6.5 ± 0.78 0.8 ± 0.45 0.0 ± 0.08
Tr38-1 29.01 ± 1.36 9.2 ± 4.49 0.0 ± 0.00 0.8 ± 0.32 48.6 ± 8.30 29.5 ± 1.04 10.9 ± 2.11 1.0 ± 0.36 0.0 ± 0.00
Tr38-2 28.88 ± 0.88 4.6 ± 0.61 0.0 ± 0.00 1.7 ± 0.02 51.2 ± 1.34 17.1 ± 1.41 6.2 ± 0.61 10.7 ± 1.38 8.6 ± 2.61
Tr65-1 36.33 ± 0.37 4.6 ± 0.52 0.2 ± 0.05 2.7 ± 0.08 66.7 ± 1.73 17.5 ± 0.83 7.3 ± 0.54 1.1 ± 0.13 0.0 ± 0.00
Tr65-2 37.88 ± 2.38 5.1 ± 0.55 0.2 ± 0.04 1.7 ± 0.04 69.6 ± 1.75 15.7 ± 0.86 6.5 ± 0.50 1.4 ± 0.16 0.0 ± 0.00
Tr138-1 35.14 ± 1.82 7.1 ± 2.17 0.2 ± 0.12 2.0 ± 0.46 56.4 ± 7.43 19.9 ± 2.42 11.6 ± 1.79 2.8 ± 0.49 0.0 ± 0.00
Tr138-2 38.16 ± 0.16 5.6 ± 0.50 0.2 ± 0.05 1.8 ± 0.03 60.7 ± 1.44 23.9 ± 0.73 7.0 ± 0.35 1.0 ± 0.16 0.0 ± 0.00
Tr138-3 33.04 ± 0.08 7.4 ± 2.54 0.4 ± 0.18 1.0 ± 0.40 62.7 ± 5.21 19.4 ± 0.80 8.3 ± 1.07 0.9 ± 0.23 0.0 ± 0.00
Tr138-4 34.38 ± 0.31 6.2 ± 1.81 0.2 ± 0.06 1.3 ± 0.11 58.6 ± 5.23 23.2 ± 2.08 8.7 ± 1.07 1.1 ± 0.12 0.7 ± 0.02
Tr6-1 37.56 ± 1.08 7.1 ± 1.28 0.2 ± 0.06 2.2 ± 0.13 65.8 ± 2.73 17.3 ± 1.20 7.1 ± 0.07 0.4 ± 0.00 0.0 ± 0.00
Tr6-3 37.04 ± 0.06 5.6 ± 0.55 0.2 ± 0.04 2.0 ± 0.08 59.9 ± 1.85 24.1 ± 1.04 7.2 ± 0.43 1.0 ± 0.13 0.0 ± 0.00
Tr6-4 39.25 ± 0.17 4.5 ± 0.47 0.3 ± 0.06 1.6 ± 0.06 71.1 ± 1.41 16.1 ± 0.69 5.6 ± 0.38 0.9 ± 0.11 0.0 ± 0.00
Tr6-5 40.17 ± 0.16 8.3 ± 2.99 0.0 ± 0.00 1.9 ± 0.30 54.0 ± 6.78 25.7 ± 1.96 8.6 ± 1.28 0.6 ± 0.11 0.9 ± 0.16
Tr8-1 31.93 ± 1.27 3.6 ± 0.36 0.0 ± 0.00 1.5 ± 0.01 70.8 ± 1.30 15.3 ± 0.63 7.6 ± 0.48 1.2 ± 0.16 0.0 ± 0.00
Tr8-3 40.00 ± 0.01 5.9 ± 1.48 0.0 ± 0.00 1.7 ± 0.58 65.3 ± 4.82 17.6 ± 1.34 8.5 ± 1.12 1.1 ± 0.30 0.0 ± 0.00
C16:0-palmitic acid, C16:1-palmitoleic acid, C18:0-strearic acid, C18:1-oleic acid, C18:2-linoleic acid, C18:3-linolenic acid, C20:1-eicosenoic acid, C22:1-erucic acid. * Values are the mean ± standard error (n = 3).
Table 3. Summary of GBS sequence data and alignment to the reference genome sequence.
Table 3. Summary of GBS sequence data and alignment to the reference genome sequence.
Total Average/Plant
Raw data
Reads 715,259,878 7,450,624
Bases (bp) 108,004,241,578 1,125,044,183
After trimming
Reads 655,243,166 6,825,450
Bases (bp) 74,621,891,073 777,311,365
Mapped reads on reference genome*
Reads 651,288,040 6,784,250
Bases (bp) 3,163,629,539 32,954,474
Reference genome coverage (%) 3.5673%
Table 4. Annotated genes list of significant associated SNPs with agronomic characteristics in rapeseed.
Table 4. Annotated genes list of significant associated SNPs with agronomic characteristics in rapeseed.
Traits Chr_position -log10(p) Gene ID Description TAIR ID Allele
TSW chrA05_1312542 12.37 BnaA05p02350D S-formylglutathione hydrolase-like AT2G41530.1 A/G
TSW chrC01_45614214 8.75 BnaC01p49650D zinc finger BED domain-containing protein RICESLEEPER 1-like AT3G14800.2 G/T
TSW chrC02_16544482 8.44 BnaC02p22490D midasin-like AT1G67120.2 G/A
TSW chrC08_30501410 6.41 BnaC08p32830D villin-3-like isoform X2 AT3G57410.9 A/G
TSW chrC03_21138185 6.40 BnaC03p36140D death-associated inhibitor of apoptosis 1 AT4G03965.1 C/T
TSW chrC05_4473754 5.90 BnaC05p08830D ubiquitin-like-specific protease 1C AT1G10570.3 G/T
TSW chrA05_2029410 5.58 BnaA05p03850D chitinase 1 AT2G43570.1 T/A
TSW chrA05_1197170 5.46 BnaA05p02100D amino acid transporter AVT1A AT2G41190.2 A/C
TSW chrC05_439211 5.30 BnaC05p00900D endoribonuclease Dicer homolog 1-like AT1G01040.2 T/C
TSW chrC05_4629489 5.25 BnaC05p09110D AP-1 complex subunit mu-2 AT1G10730.1 C/T
TSW chrC08_28339798 5.12 BnaC08p29480D RNA-binding protein 5 AT3G54230.5 G/A
TSW chrA03_20827042 5.07 BnaA03p44720D ATPase 6, plasma membrane-type AT2G07560.1 T/A
TSW chrA03_5465396 5.02 BnaA03p13200D serine acetyltransferase 5 AT5G56760.1 G/A
TSW chrC09_4097062 4.91 BnaC09p07010D U2 snRNP-associated SURP motif-containing protein isoform X2 AT5G25060.1 T/G
Table 5. Annotated genes list of significant associated SNPs with oil traits in rapeseed.
Table 5. Annotated genes list of significant associated SNPs with oil traits in rapeseed.
Traits Chr_position -log10(p) Gene ID Description TAIR ID Allele
C16:1 chrA08_16580415 5.244 BnaA08p17150D Encodes a putative E3 ubiquitin ligase AT4G34100.1 C/T
C20:1 chrC01_1257401 5.317 BnaC01p02330D probable Xaa-Pro aminopeptidase P isoform X2 AT4G36760.2 C/A
C22:1 chrC03_6878724 9.783 BnaC03p14350D EXO70 gene family AT5G58430.1 C/T
C22:1 chrC08_21249315 8.150 BnaC08p19880D paramyosin-like AT1G19980.1 C/T
C22:1 chrA08_12298481 6.984 BnaA08p10580D mediator of RNA polymerase II transcription subunit 34 AT1G31360.3 C/A
C22:1 chrC02_56355748 6.971 BnaC02p56750D cyclin-C1-1 AT5G48640.1 A/G
C22:1 chrC02_51025897 5.142 BnaC02p51020D ribonuclease T2 family AT2G02990.1 G/A
C22:1 chrA08_11469852 4.922 BnaA08p09630D protein ENHANCED DISEASE RESISTANCE 2-like isoform X2 AT5G35180.4 G/A
Crude fat chrA09_3387964 6.924 BnaA09p05630D Part of a nanodomain complex that tethers PI4Kα1 to the plasma membrane AT5G26850.1 C/A
Crude fat chrA09_18251187 5.590 BnaA09p27860D 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate synthase 6 AT4G11280.1 A/G
Crude fat chrC05_2572075 5.511 BnaC05p05120D mitoferrin AT1G07030.1 G/C
Crude fat chrA09_38265711 5.460 BnaA09p39540D Transmembrane amino acid transporter family protein AT1G25530.1 C/T
Crude fat chrA10_15664715 5.203 BnaA10p21730D chromo domain-containing protein LHP1-like AT5G17690.3 T/C
Crude fat chrA09_32798569 5.137 BnaA09p32690D non-lysosomal glucosylceramidase AT1G33700.1 T/G
Crude fat chrA09_39092505 5.136 BnaA09p40920D RING-H2 finger protein ATL47-like AT1G23980.1 C/T
Crude fat chrA09_32277805 4.977 BnaA09p32130D embryogenesis-associated protein EMB8 AT1G34340.1 T/C
Crude fat chrC05_2503939 4.970 BnaC05p04980D CEP DOWNSTREAM 1 AT1G06830.1 A/G
rude fat chrC03_71451788 4.926 BnaC03p90410D protein CHUP1, chloroplastic-like AT1G52080.1 A/T
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

Privacy Settings

© 2025 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated