Preprint
Article

This version is not peer-reviewed.

Chemical Profiling of Diffusible and Volatile Secondary Metab-Olites Produced by Beauveria bassiana Using GC-MS Analysis: In Vitro Antimicrobial Activity

Submitted:

06 April 2023

Posted:

10 April 2023

You are already at the latest version

Abstract
The genus Beauveria include important entomopathogenic and endophytic fungi, among them, B. bassiana is the most studied species. However, there are few knowledge regarding their antimicrobial activity. The current research has been conducted to evaluate in vitro antibacterial efficacy of five isolates of B. bassiana against Bacillus cereus, B. megaterium, B. mojavensis, Clavibacter michiganensis (gram positive bacteria, G+ve), Xanthomonas campestris, X. vesicatoria, Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and P. fluorescence (gram negative bacteria, G-ve). In addition, chemical composition of the principal diffusible metabolites and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) of the most efficient studied isolate of B. bassiana has been carried out using GC-MS analysis. The obtained results showed that, the isolate UniB2439-3 has promising antibacterial effect against most of studied target bacteria. GC-MS analysis of diffusible metabolites detected the presence of hexanedioic acid, bis(2-ethylhexyl) ester as the main compound in the cell-free culture filtrate. Furthermore, GC-MS analysis of VOCs revealed the presence of ethanol; butanal,2-methyl; 2,4-dimethyl-1-heptene; octane, 4-methyl and β-elemene as the main dominant bioactive compounds. The outgoing results explicated that, the isolates of B. bassiana have promising antibacterial activity which could be correlated to their diffusible and VOCs metabolites. Therefore, the selected isolate can be potentially used as a biocontrol agent against several bacteria especially G+ve ones. Taking in consideration that the antibiotics are forbidden in agriculture in many countries worldwide, search for possible natural alternatives as efficient antimicrobial agents are highly interesting.
Keywords: 
;  ;  ;  ;  ;  

1. Introduction

Genus Beauveria include entomopathogenic and endophytic fungi which are widely spread in different habitats [1,2,3]. Furthermore, many researchers reported that fungi in the genus Beauveria can produce enzymes for biotransformation and biodestructors [4,5]. On the other hand, the genus Beauveria is considered also a human pathogen where it causes opportunistic infections especially in patients with weak immune systems [6].
Some species of this genus, such as B. bassiana and B. brongniartii are able to produce mycoinsecticides [7]. B. bassiana is also a beneficial microorganism (BM) and endophytic fungi (EF) in several crops and is commonly known as biological control agent against a variety of agricultural pests [3,8,9,10]. The application of B. bassiana has many advantages such as being an eco-friendly management compared to chemical pesticides where it is harmless to human health [8,10,11,12]. For decades, several scientists have reported the importance of B. bassiana in reducing a range of nuisance insects, where it can induce direct insect mortality [2,13,14] and can also reach 90% reduction of life-time fecundity [15].
A recent study, conducted by Barra-Bucarei et al. [16] to evaluate the colonization ability of native endophyte of different strains of B. bassiana and their antifungal effect against Botrytis cinerea in tomato and chili pepper concluded that all studied strains had significant in vitro antagonism against B. cinerea. The same study reported that, the native strains of B. bassiana were able to colonize tomato and chili pepper tissues and provided important levels of antagonism [16].
Another research conducted by Sinno et al [10] has evaluated different isolates of B. bassiana as plant-growth promoting (PGP) and protective agent for tomato plants against B. cinerea, Alternaria alternata and the pest aphis, Macrosiphum euphorbiae. The results showed that some studied isolates were able to control the two phytopathogens, whereas one isolate was also able to promote plant growth [10]. The antibacterial activity of crude ethyl acetate extract of B. bassiana against some aerobic pathogenic bacteria been tested by Parine et al [17]. The results explicated that the extract of B. bassiana possess a strong inhibiting activity against many of tested species especially Bacillus megaterium, B. subtilis, B. sphaericus and Escherichia coli [17]. Whereas, it showed a moderate effect against Micrococcus luteus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and low effect against Streptococcus pyogenes and Chromobacterium violaceum [17]. In another study, the application of conidia of B. bassiana has protected tomato seedlings from damping-off disease caused by the soil-borne pathogen Rhizoctonia solani [18].
Recently, there is a huge interest for discovering natural substances based plant or microbe origins having herbicidal and/or pesticide effect [19,20]. However, the new discovered natural substances should be evaluated for safety to avoid any possible negative health impact [21,22]. In addition, the discovery of possible natural alternatives for reducing the excessive use of synthetic chemicals, decreasing the environmental hazards and avoiding the appearance of new resistance microbial strains to common microbicide compounds should be highly considered [18,23].
There are few information regarding the bioactive metabolites produced by B. bassiana either diffusible or volatiles and also their mechanism of action in the antimicrobial activity and plant growth promotion effect. A recent study conducted by Wang et al [24] reported that B. bassiana produces a variety of toxins such as beauvericin, bassianin, bassianolide, beauverolides, tenellin, oosporein and oxalic acid, which give the ability to B. bassiana to colonize, parasitize and kill the host tissues. Therefore, the precise chemical characterization and determination of the main bioactive single substances of B. bassiana will certainly aid in understanding its biological importance. In addition, the details of chemical constituents of B. bassiana will undoubtedly serve for various applications such as control plant diseases, taking in consideration the heavy reliance on chemicals that are extremely harmful to environment as well as plants, animals and human health. Furthermore, there are many studies have been carried out regarding the insecticidal effect of B. bassiana, but there are few studies undersigned their antifungal or antibacterial effect.
The main objective of this research is to study the chemical composition of the principal diffusible metabolites and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) of B. bassiana and shed light on the possible transformation and/or fragmentations of its different chemical derivatives. Hence, the chemical composition of B. bassiana metabolites will aid in the detection and differentiation of this species from others. The full identification of each single component can help in its utilization in industrial, agricultural and pharmaceutical field. In addition, in this research we will expand the possible benefits of B. bassiana against new non-reported target phytopathogens. In particular, the aims of the current research were to i) evaluate the antagonistic activity of five isolates of B. bassiana against some phytopathgenic bacteria; ii) investigate in vitro antimicrobial activity of secondary metabolites extracted from the most efficient isolate; iii) chemically characterize the diffusible secondary metabolites (DSMs) and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) obtained from the most efficient isolate using GC-MS analysis.

2. Results

2.1. Molecular identification of the studied isolates of Beauveria

The PCR amplification with Bt2a/Bt2b produced, for each gDNA extracted from the above five isolates (UniB2439-1; UniB2439-2, UniB2439-3, UniB2439-4, UniB2439-5), amplicons with molecular weight about 330 bp. No amplification was observed in case of the negative control. The amplicons were directly sequenced (BMR Genomics, Padova, Italy) and the obtained sequences were compared with those available in GenBank nucleotide archive (AB829899; AB829898 and CP045886.1) using Basic Local Alignment Search Tool software BLAST (Bethesda, Rockville Pike, MD, USA) [25]. The sequences analysis showed high similarities percentages with the sequences of B. bassiana. The five obtained sequences were deposited in the NCBI GeneBank with accession numbers FR989662 to FR989666.

2.2. Antagonistic activity of B. bassiana isolates

The preliminary results showed that, all tested isolates of B. bassiana, had antagonistic effect against most of tested bacterial strains. Particularly, the efficient isolate was UniB2439-3, where it showed the highest significant effect against B. cereus, B. mojavensis and C. michiganensis, moderate effect against B. megaterium and X. vesicatoria, low effect against X. campestris and P. fluorescens, whereas no activity was observed in case P. aeruginosa (Figure 1). Therefore, the isolate UniB2439-3 was selected for further biological and chromatographic analyses.

2.3. Antimicrobial activity of secondary metabolites

The obtained results of the extracted metabolites from the selected isolate of B. bassiana UniB2439-3 showed that, the Exo-ME was able to inhibit the growth of most tested bacterial strains higher than the Endo-ME (Table 1). In particular, Exo-ME showed the highest significant activity against X. vesicatoria, B. mojavensis and C. michiganensis (Table 1). In addition, both extracts showed equal activity against X. campestris. Whereas, only Endo-ME showed antibacterial activity against P. aeruginosa (Table 1). On the other hand, Endo-ME was not active against X. vesicatoria, B. cereus, B. mojavensis and C. michiganensis (Table 1). Although both extracts were lower efficient than the control (Tetracycline), but they can be considered promising and optimistic antimicrobial agents, being natural biopesticides can be potential alternatives to chemical and synthetic antibiotics.
Bars with different letters are significantly different according to one-way ANOVA combined with Tukey B post hoc multiple comparison test at P < 0.05 using SPSS statistical analysis software. Data for each bar are expressed as the mean of three replicates ± SDs.

2.4. GC-MS analysis of secondary metabolites

2.4.1. Diffusible metabolites

The GC-MS analysis of diffusible metabolites detected the presence of hexanedioic acid, bis(2-ethylhexyl) ester as the main diffusible compound in the cell-free culture filtrate of B. bassiana UniB2439-3 with molecular weight 370 and relative area 100% (Table 2).

2.4.2. Volatile metabolites (VOCs)

GC-MS analysis of the VOCs produced by B. bassiana UniB2439-3 showed that the dominant principal compounds, listed in Table (3), are: i) ethanol, ii) butanal,2-methyl, iii) 2,4-dimethyl-1-heptene, iv) octane, 4-methyl and v) β-elemene among the total 34 detected volatile compounds (Table S1). In particular, the most abundant constituents were ethanol and β-elemene with relative areas 4.69 and 6.98 %, respectively.

3. Discussion

Several research have been conducted recently to overcome the multi-drug resistant (MDR) microorganisms to different antibiotics and chemotherapeutic agents [26]. Hence, the search for new active and natural agents get a great interest, particularly, for human health and environmental protection [27]. Beauveria, one of the most studied genus among entomopathogenic fungi, has various biological applications as growth promoting agent or insecticides [9,10,28,29]. The capacity of B. bassiana to produce several diffusible or volatiles bioactive metabolites with promising antimicrobial properties is in agreement with the previous bibliographic research who investigate the antagonistic effect against several phytopathogens [9,17,30]. In fact, the bibliographic research revealed that the genus Beauveria produced some interesting metabolites such as oosporein, beauvericin, bassianolide, bassianin, beauveriolide, bassiacridin and cyclosporine which having notable insecticide and antimicrobial actions [31,32]. On the other hand, some of the produced metabolites from B. bassiana could contain interesting cell-wall hydrolytic enzymes which are able to degrade microbial cell wall and hence inhibition the growth of several phytopathogens [33].
On the other hand, Barra-Bucarei et al [16] studied the antifungal activity of ten native strains of B. bassiana, endophyte for tomato and chili pepper and observed that the majority of studied native strains were able to colonize tomato and chili pepper tissues and showed promising antagonistic effect against B. cinerea.
The obtained results of GC-MS analysis of diffusible metabolites extracted from B. bassiana UniB2439-3 revealed the presence of hexanedioic acid, bis(2-ethylhexyl) ester which has been identified in different bacteria such as Sterptomyces spp., showed promising antimicrobial activity against several human and/or food pathogenic bacteria such as Micrococcus luteus, Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus and Salmonella enterica and also against the phytopathogenic fungi, Fusarium sp. [34].
Furthermore, Hernández-Ceja et al [35] reported that the extract from Adenophyllum porophyllum has strongly inhibited the mycelial growth of the pathogenic fungi Pestalotiopsis clavispora, Colletotrichum gloeosporioides and Lasiodiplodia pseudotheobromae, responsible for the dieback disease of blueberry (Vaccinium spp). The same authors have analyzed the chemical constituents extracted from A. porophyllum by GC-MS and concluded that hexanedioic acid, bis(2-ethylhexyl) ester was the major compound present in the A. porophyllum extract [35]. In addition, Bai et al [36] analyzed the chemical constituents of the supercritical fluid extract from roots of Stellera chamaejasme and found that the hexanedioic acid, bis (2-ethylhexyl) ester, among 12 dominant single compounds detected, showed antifungal activity against Monilinia fructicola.
Regarding the VOCs produced by B. bassiana UniB2439-3, the obtained results are in agree with many research which reported that oosporein, beauvericin, bassianolide, bassianin, beauveriolide, bassiacridin and cyclosporine are the most abundant metabolites produced by B. bassiana [37,38,39]. In particular, in our study, it was observed that the beauvericin was fragmented into diethyl phthalate with 90%, the major dominant constituent, carbon dioxide and nitrous oxide (Table S1). Whereas, bassianolide was converted to butanal, 3-methyl with 81% or butanol, 3-methyl with 83% (Table S1). Regarding bassianin, GC-MS analysis showed that this compound was converted into 2,4-Dimethyl-1-heptene with 90% (Table S1). Whereas, beauveriolide was fragmented into butanal, 3-methyl with 81%, carbon dioxide and nitrous oxide (Table S1). Regarding cyclosporine, results demonstrated that this compound was fragmented into butanal, 2-methyl- (90%), butanal, 3-methyl- (81%), 1-butanol, 3-methyl- (83%), carbon dioxide and nitrous oxide (Table S1).
Several studies revealed that beauvericin and oosporein evidenced remarkable antibiotic and antifungal properties [40,41] which are probably involved in the microbial growth inhibition observed in the bioassay presented in this study Furthermore, Wang and Xu [42] reported that beauvericin was one of the active constituents of B. bassiana and confirmed to have antimicrobial activity and anti-tumor effect especially against human leukemia. In another study, conducted by Manning and Wyatt [43], the results demonstrated that oosporein, extracted from the broth cultures of Beauveria and Chaetomium, has been identified as a toxic substance for plants and poultry.
Regarding the β-elemene, our obtained results detected the presence of an important sesquiterpene compound identified as β-elemene (cyclohexane, 1-ethenyl-1-methyl-2,4-bis(1-methylethenyl), 1S-(1.alpha.,2.beta.,4.beta.), among the detected VOCs substances from the studied Beauveria isolate. This compound (β-elemene) was identified for the first time in 1994 in the dry rhizome extract from Curcuma phaeocaulis, C. kwangsinensis and C. wenyujing [32]. In addition, β-elemene is also one of the common constituents of several aromatic essential oils extracted from Proteus vulgaris [44]. β-elemene was also found in wild hops from Lithuania at levels up to 14% [45] and in notable amounts in the medical cannabis cultivar 'bedropuur' [46]. The same compound has notable antimicrobial activity against different pathogens including Mycobacterium tuberculosis as reported by Sieniawska et al. [47].
Generally, the mechanism of the antimicrobial activity of several terpenes is highly related to their lipophilic property which enable them to dissolve in the phospholipid layers of microbial cell membrane [48]. Particularly, natural sesquiterpenes such as β-elemene originated from plant and microorganisms showed promising antimicrobial activity [49,50]. A recent study conducted by Monga and Sharma [51] reported that β-elemene and R-limonene playing an essential role in degrading the microbial cell wall altering the expressions of dprE1 and clgR genes, responsible for the cell wall synthesis and cell membrane preservation, respectively.
On the other hand, some recent studies reported the promising cytotoxic effect of β-elemene which can inhibit cell proliferation, arrest cell cycle and induce cell apoptosis or autophagy [52]. β-elemene is one of the most promising inhibitors of glycolysis rate-limiting enzyme especially (PKM2) through the interfering with tumor glycolysis which consider one of the most important recent strategy for treating tumors [53,54]. In fact, several research reported that the inhibition of tumor growth and proliferation can be achieved by down-regulating expression of PKM2 enzyme [55]. In addition, Pan et al. [56] pointed to the role of β-elemene in inhibiting the breast cancer cell migration by conversion the dimer and tetramer forms of PKM2 and inhibit the aerobic glycolysis and reduce the utilization of glucose and the production of lactic acid for tumor cell growth.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Isolation, culturing and identification

Five strains of Beauveria bassiana (UniB2439-1; UniB2439-2, UniB2439-3, UniB2439-4, UniB2439-5), isolated from different soil and vegetal samples, were identified based on morphological features and molecular basis. For molecular identification, the total gDNA was extracted and amplified using the universal primer Bt2a (5′-GGTAACCAAATCGGTGCTGCTTTC) and Bt2b (5′-ACCCTCAGTGTAGTGACCCTTGGC) [57]. The obtained amplicons were sequenced and then analyzed using Basic Local Alignment Search Tool software (BLAST-USA). The studied isolates were maintained as lyophils at 4°C in the fungal collection of School of Agricultural, Forestry, Food and Environmental Sciences (SAFE), University of Basilicata, Potenza, Italy. The subcultures were carried out on Sabouraud Dextrose Agar plus 1% Yeast-extract (SDAY) nutrient media [5] and incubated at 22±2°C for 96 hrs [58].

4.2. Antagonistic activity

The antagonistic activity of the five studied isolates of B. bassiana was evaluated against some pathogenic bacteria. All tested isolates were obtained from the pure cultures conserved in the collection of SAFE and previously identified based on morphological and molecular methods. The tested bacteria are listed in Table (4).
The antibacterial assay was carried out as described by Elshafie et al [59]. About 0.5 cm fungal disc from the fresh PDA culture (96 hrs) of each studied isolates of B. bassiana were deposited in the center of KB Petri dish and incubated for 16 hrs at 22±2°C. Successively, a suspension of soft-agar (0.7%) of each tested bacteria at 108 CFU/ml was sprayed over the plates using Eco-Spray Ecological Aerosol (Seidden Identificación, Madrid – Spain). All plates were incubated at 30°C for 24 hrs. Two KB plates inoculated only with each tested bacteria were used as negative control. The experiment was run in triplicate and the diameter of inhibition zone was measured with a caliber and recorded as the mean ± SD (n = 3). The antagonistic bacterial activity percentage (ABP %) was calculated using the Equation (1):
ABP (%) = D.iz/D.ct × 100;
Where ABP: is antagonistic bacterial activity; D.iz: is the diameter of inhibition zones in cm; D.ct: is the diameter of control plates in cm.
Table 4. The tested bacterial strains in the current study.
Table 4. The tested bacterial strains in the current study.
Bacteria name Author Collection number Gram type
B. cereus Frankland & Frankland UniB12421 G+ve
B. megaterium de Bary UniB12421
B. mojavensis Roberts UniB10718
C. michiganensis (Smith) Davis UniB3718
X. campestris (Pammel) Dowson UniB7718 G-ve
X. vesicatoria (Doidge) Dye UniB8718
P. aeruginosa (Schröter) Migula UniB02421
P. fluorescens (Flügge) Migula UniB05421
All tested bacteria, with a collection number for each strain, are conserved in the collection of SAFE, University of Basilicata, Potenza, Italy.

4.3. Extraction of secondary metabolites

On the base of the preliminary antagonistic assay, the most efficient isolate (UniB2439-3) of B. bassiana was selected for the successive studies. For this scope, 2 mL of the fungal suspension (106 spore/mL) of the above isolate, was used for inoculating 500 mL SDY broth nutrient media and then incubated for 7 days at 25°C in agitation (180 rpm). Both, Extracellular (Exo-ME) and Endocellular (Endo-ME) metabolites have been extracted from the broth culture after the incubation period.
For Endo-ME, the incubated broth culture was centrifuged at 40,000 g for 15 min and the pellet (2 g) was collected, resuspended in 50 mL of Limonene (CAS 138-86-3- Aldrich, Steinheim, Germany), shaked for 2 hrs and the solvent was evaporated after that using the Rotary-evaporator (Heidolph WB2000, Schwabach, Germany). The residue was resuspended in 2 ml of sterile distilled water (SDW), extracted following Solid Phase Extraction (SPE) by using C-18 column (Thermo Scientific, Rockwood, USA) and recovered using 1 mL methanol to reach the final original concentration of (20 mg/mL) [23].
For Exo-ME, the supernatant (250 mL), obtained from the above centrifugation step, was filtered using 0.22 µm (Syringe filter - hydrophilic, Minisart, Goettingen, Germany) and extracted using a separator funnel containing 250 mL ethyl acetate/ethanol (70:30; v/v) and shacked for 15 min. The organic phase was filtered through a filter paper (Whatman, Ø. 25 mm, Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) and evaporated using the Rotary-evaporator. The dry residue (50 mg) was resuspended in 2 mL SDW, extracted through SPE using C-18 column and recovered using 1 mL methanol to reach the final original concentration of (16 mg/mL) [23].

4.4. Antibacterial activity of extracted secondary metabolites

The antibacterial activity of both metabolites extracts was carried out against the same pathogenic bacteria used for the initial antagonistic assay, listed in Table (1).
Disc diffusion assay. The antibacterial test of both metabolites extracts produced by the most bioactive isolate UniB2439-3 was carried out following the disc diffusion method as described by Elshafie el al [60] and Sofo et al. [61]. A bacterial suspension of each tested bacteria was prepared in sterile distilled water adjusted at 106 CFU/mL (OD ≈ 0.2 nm) using UV-Spectrophotometer (Amersham, Ultraspec 1100 pro/500 pro, UK). Four mL of bacterial suspension mixed with soft agar 0.7 % (9:1; v/v) was poured over each KB plate (9 Φ cm). Blank discs of 6 mm (OXOID, Milan-Italy) were then placed over the plates and 15 µL from each tested metabolites extract (Exo-ME 16 mg/mL and Endo-ME 20 mg/mL) was carefully applied over discs. Tetracycline (1600 µg/mL) was used as a positive control. The experiment was performed in triplicates and the antibacterial activity was estimated by measuring the diameter of inhibition zone in mm ± SDs compared to the positive control ones.

4.5. Chemical characterization of secondary metabolites

4.5.1. GC-MS analysis of Exo-diffusible metabolites

On the base of the results from the antibacterial assay of the extracted metabolites, the most bioactive extract (Exo-ME) was selected for the successive chemical characterization. A qualitative analysis of the SPE methanol extract of the selected Beaveria isolate was carried out using GC-MS (Agilent HP6890) equipped with a Phenomenex Zebron ZB-5 MS capillary column 30 m x 0.25 mm ID x 0.25 μm film thickness (Conquer Scientific, Poway, California, USA). A HP 5973 mass selective (mass range: 15-800 mAU; scan rate: 1.9 scan/s; EM voltage: 1435) was used as detector, whereas helium at 0.8 ml/min was used as carrier gas. The injection port, equipped with a glass insert (internal diameter 0.75 mm) was splitted at 250°C and the desorption time of 1.0 min was used. Detector was maintained at 230°C. Oven was maintained at 80°C for 3 min, then the temperature was increased until 250°C (20°C/min) for 10 min. All the analyses were performed in triplicates. The chromatogram obtained from the total ion current were integrated without any correction for coelutions and the results were expressed as percent of the total area of peaks. All peaks were identified from their mass spectra by comparison with those present in Wiley 6N and NIST11 libraries [59,62].

4.5.2. GC-MS of volatile organic compounds

The fresh culture (96 hrs) of the selected Beaveria isolate was inoculated in glass tube of 10 ml PDA nutrient media and incubated at 22°C for 5 days under darkness for collecting the volatile organic compounds (VOCs) as described by Elshafie et al [63]. The eventually produced VOCs have been analyzed qualitatively using Solid Phase Micro Extraction method (SPME) as discussed below.
The SPME fiber coated with 100 μm of non-grafted poly (dimethylsiloxane) phase (Supelco 57300-U, mounted on a Supelco 57,330 support- Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germania) was conditioned for 1 h at 250°C in a stream of helium. A blank run was performed after each analysis in order to confirm that no residual compounds were polluting the fiber or the column. The fiber was later introduced into the injection port of a HP6890 plus gas chromatograph equipped with a Phenomenex Zebron ZB-5 MS capillary column (30 m x 0.25 mm ID x 0.25 μm film thickness). A HP 5973 mass selective (mass range: 15-800 mAU; scan rate: 1.9 scan/s; EM voltage: 1435) was used as detector, whereas helium at 0.8 mL/min was used as carrier gas. The injection port, equipped with a glass insert (internal diameter 0.75 mm) was splitted at 250°C. The desorption time of 1.0 min was used. Detector was maintained at 230°C. Oven was maintained at 80°C for 3 min, then the temperature was increased until 250°C (20°C/min) for 10 min. All the analyses were performed in triplicate. The chromatograms obtained from the total ion current were integrated without any correction for coelutions and the results were expressed as percent of the total area of peaks. All peaks were identified from their mass spectra by comparison with those present in Wiley 6N and NIST11 libraries [62,63].

5. Conclusions

B. bassiana, apart from being a notable entomopathogenic fungi or biocontrol agent against some phytopathogenic fungi, itself or its bioactive metabolites could be also used efficiently to control several bacteria in agronomic field where it is forbidden to utilize antibiotic especially in organic farming. In addition, B. bassiana could be also useful biocontrol agent against MDR microorganisms to different antibiotics which are considered a dominant medical problem worldwide. The obtained results from the current research concluded that, B. bassiana UniB2439-3, was able to produce some interesting bioactive secondary metabolites either diffusible as hexanedioic acid, bis(2-ethylhexyl) ester or VOCs as ethanol; butanal,2-methyl; 2,4-dimethyl-1-heptene; octane, 4-methyl and β-elemene. The ability of B. bassiana to produce the above-mentioned metabolites can underling its antagonistic activity against several phytopathogens as reported previously in the bibliographic research. Future studies remain necessary for evaluation the in vivo antimicrobial activity of each single identified bioactive metabolites from B. bassiana against some common human and phytopathogens.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at the website of this paper posted on Preprints.org. Figure S1: Chromatogram of the purified diffusible metabolites of B. bassiana UniB2439-3; Figure S2: Mass spectra of Hexanedioic acid, bis(2-ethylhexyl) ester; Figure S3: Chromatogram of VOCs extracted from B. bassiana UniB2439-3; Figure S4: Mass spectra of ethanol; Figure S5: Mass spectra of Butanal, 2-methyl; Figure S6: Mass spectra of 2,4-Dimethyl-1-heptene; Figure S7: Mass spectra of Octane, 4-methyl; Figure S8: Mass spectra of β-elemene. Table S1: The whole list of GC-MS analysis of VOCs extracted from B. bassiana UniB2439-3.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Ippolito Camele and Hazem Elshafie; Data curation, Sadeek Sadeek and Rocco Racioppi; Investigation, Ippolito Camele, Sadeek Sadeek and Hazem Elshafie; Methodology, Sadeek Sadeek, Rocco Racioppi and Hazem Elshafie; Supervision, Ippolito Camele and Sadeek Sadeek; Writing – original draft, Hazem Elshafie; Writing – review & editing, Ippolito Camele and Hazem Elshafie.

Funding

This study was carried out within the Agritech National Research Center and received funding from the European Union Next-GenerationEU (PIANO NAZIONALE DI RIPRESA E RESILIENZA (PNRR) – MISSIONE 4 COMPONENTE 2, INVESTIMENTO 1.4 – D.D. 1032 17/06/2022, CN00000022). This manuscript reflects only the authors’ views and opinions, neither the European Union nor the European Commission can be considered responsible for them.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Vega, F.E.; Goettel, M.S.; Blackwell, M.; Chandler, D.; Jackson, M.A.; Keller, S.; Koike, M.; Maniania, N.K.; Monz´on, A.; Ownley, B.H.; Pell, J.K.; Rangel, D.E.N.; Roy, H.E. Fungal entomopathogens: new insights on their ecology. Fungal Ecol. 2009, 2, 149–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Barbarin, A.M.; Jenkins, N.E.; Rajotte, E.G.; Thomas, M.B. A preliminary evaluation of the potential of Beauveria bassiana for bed bug control. J. Invertebrate Pathol. 2012, 111, 82–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Wraight, S.P.; Lopes, R.B.; Faria, M. Chapter 16: Microbial Control of Mite and Insect Pests of Greenhouse Crops. In Microbial Control of Insect and Mite Pests; 2017; pp. 237–252. [Google Scholar]
  4. Yuan, W.; Wang, P.; Zhang, Z.; Li, S. Glycosylation of (–)-maackiain by Beauveria bassiana and Cunninghamella echinulata var. elegans. Biocatal. Biotransformation 2010, 28, 117–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Berestetskiya, A.O.; Ivanovaa, A.N.; Petrovaa, M.O.; Prokof’evab, D.S.; Stepanychevaa, E.A.; Uspanovc, A.M.; Lednev, G.R. Comparative analysis of the biological activity and chromatographic profiles of the extracts of Beauveria bassiana and B. pseudobassiana cultures grown on different nutrient substrates. Microbiology 2018, 87, 200–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Begley, C.G.; Waggoner, P. Soft contact lens contamination by Beauveria bassiana. Int. Contact Lens Clinic. 1992, 19, 247–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Vega, F.E. The use of fungal entomopathogens as endophytes in biological control: a review. Mycologia 2018, 110, 4–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Fabrice, D.H.; Elie, D.A.; Kobi, D.O.; Valerien, Z.A.; Thomas, H.A.; Joëlle, T.; Maurille, E.I.A.T.; Dénis, O.B.; Manuele, T. Toward the efficient use of Beauveria bassiana in integrated cotton insect pest management. J. Cotton Res. 2020, 3, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wang, Y.; Tang, D.; Duan, D.; Wang, Y.; Yu, H. Morphology, molecular characterization, and virulence of Beauveria pseudobassiana isolated from different hosts. J. Inverteb. Pathol. 2020, 72, 107333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Sinno, M.; Ranesi, M.; Di Lelio, I.; Iacomino, G.; Becchimanzi, A.; Barra, E.; Molisso, D.; Pennacchio, F.; Digilio, M.C.; Vitale, S.; et al. Selection of endophytic Beauveria bassiana as a dual biocontrol agent of tomato pathogens and pests. Pathogens 2021, 10, 1242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Faria, M.R.; Wraight, S.P. Biological control of Bemisia tabaci with fungi. Crop Prot. 2001, 20, 767–778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Faria, M.R.; Wraight, S.P. Mycoinsecticides and mycoacaricides: a comprehensive list with worldwide coverage and international classification of formulation types. Biol. Control 2007, 43, 237–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Fargues, J.; Remaudiere, G. Consideration on the specificity of entomopathogenic fungi. Mycopathologia 1977, 62, 31–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Hasaballah, A.I.; Fouda, M.A.; Hassan, M.I.; Omar, G.M. Pathogenicity of Beauveria bassiana and Metarhizium anisopliae on the adult housefly, Musca domestica L. Egypt. Acad. J. Biolog. Sci. (A. Entomology) 2017, 10, 79–86. [Google Scholar]
  15. Acharya, N.; Rajotte, E.G.; Jenkins, N.E.; Thomas, M.B. Potential for biocontrol of house flies, Musca domestica, using fungal biopesticides. Biocontrol Sci. Technol. 2015, 25, 513–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Barra-Bucarei, L.; Iglesias, A.F.; González, M.G.; Aguayo, G.S.; Carrasco-Fernández, J.; Castro, J.F.; Campos, J.O. Antifungal activity of Beauveria bassiana Endophyte against Botrytis cinerea in Two Solanaceae Crops. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Parine, N.R.; Pathan, A.K.; Sarayu, B.; Nishanth, V.S.; Bobbarala, V. Antibacterial e_cacy of secondary metabolites from entomopathogenic fungi Beauveria bassiana. Int. J. Chem. Anal. Sci. 2010, 1, 94–96. [Google Scholar]
  18. Ownley, B.H.; Bishop, D.G.; Pereira, R.M. Biocontrol of Rhizoctonia damping off of tomato with Beauveria bassiana. Phytopathol. 2000, 90, S58. [Google Scholar]
  19. Della Pepa, T.; Elshafie, H.S.; Capasso, R.; De Feo, V.; Camele, I.; Nazzaro, F.; Scognamiglio, M.R.; Caputo, L. Antimicrobial and phytotoxic activity of Origanum heracleoticum and O. majorana essential oils growing in Cilento (Southern Italy). Molecules 2019, 24, 2576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Gruľová, D.; Caputo, L.; Elshafie, H. S.; Baranová, B.; De Martino, L.; Sedlák, V.; Camele, I.; De Feo, V. Thymol chemotype Origanum vulgare L. essential oil as a potential selective bio-based herbicide on monocot plant species. Molecules 2020, 25, 595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Anyanwu, M. U.; Okoye, R.C. Antimicrobial Activity of Nigerian Medicinal Plants. J. Intercult Ethnopharmacol 2017, 6, 240–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Keifer, M.C.; Firestone, J. Neurotoxicity of pesticides. J. Agromed. 2007, 12, 17–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Camele, I.; Elshafie, H.S.; Caputo, L.; Sakr, S.H.; De Feo, V. Bacillus mojavensis: Biofilm formation and biochemical investigation of its bioactive metabolites. J. Biol. Res. 2019, 92, 39–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Wang, H.; Peng, H.; Li, W.; Cheng, P.; Gong, M. The toxins of Beauveria bassiana and the strategies to improve their virulence to insects. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 705343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Altschul, S.F.; Madden, T.L.; Schäffer, A.A.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, Z.; Miller, W.; Lipman, D.J. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res 1997, 25, 3389–3402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Yang, X.; Ye, W.; Qi, Y.; Ying, Y.; Xia, Z. Overcoming Multidrug Resistance in Bacteria Through Antibiotics Delivery in Surface-Engineered Nano-Cargos: Recent Developments for Future Nano-Antibiotics. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2021, 9, 696514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Soothill, G.; Hu, Y.; Coates, A. Can we prevent antimicrobial resistance by csing antimicrobials better? Pathogens 2013, 2, 422–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zimmermann, G. Review on safety of the entomopathogenic fungi Beauveria bassiana and Beauveria brongniartii. Biocontrol Sci. Technol. 2007, 17, 553–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Chen, W.H.; Liu, M.; Huang, Z.X.; Yang, G.M.; Han, Y.F.; Liang, J.D.; Liang, Z.Q. Beauveria majiangensis, a new entomopathogenic fungus from Guizhou, China. Phytotaxa 2018, 333, 243–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ownley, B.H.; Pereira, R.M.; Klingeman, W.E.; Quigley, N.B.; Leckie, B.M. Beauveria bassiana, a dual purpose biological control with activity against insect pests and plant pathogens. Emerg. Concepts Plant Health Manag. 2004, 2004, 255–269. [Google Scholar]
  31. Suzuki, A.; Kanaoka, M.; Isogai, A.; Tamura, S.; Murakoshi, S.; Ichinoe, M. Bassianolide, a new insecticidal cyclodepsipeptide from Beauveria bassiana and Verticillium lecanii. Tetrahedron Lett. 1977, 18, 2167–2170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Wang, S.; Zhao, Z.; Yun-Ting, S.; Zeng, Z.; Zhan, X.; Li, C.; Xie, T. A review of medicinal plant species with elemene in China. Afr. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 2012, 6, 3032–3040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. El Kichaoui, A.; Elnabris, K.; Shafie, A.; Fayyad, N.; Arafa, M.; El Hindi, M. Development of Beauveria bassiana based bio-fungicide against Fusarium wilt pathogens for Capsicum annuum. IUG J. Nat. Stud. 2017, 183–190. [Google Scholar]
  34. Elleuch, L.; Shaaban, M.; Smaoui, S.; Mellouli, L.; Karray-Rebai, I.; Fourati-Ben Fguira, L.; Shaaban, K. A.; Laatsch, H. Bioactive secondary metabolites from a new terrestrial Streptomyces sp. TN262. Applied biochem. Biotechnol. 2010, 162, 579–593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Hernández-Ceja, A.; Loeza-Lara, P.D.; Espinosa-García, F.J.; García-Rodríguez, Y.M.; Medina-Medrano, J.R.; Gutiérrez-Hernández, G.F.; Ceja-Torres, L.F. In Vitro antifungal activity of plant extracts on pathogenic fungi of blueberry (Vaccinium sp.). Plants 2021, 10, 852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Bai, X.N.; Cheng, J.; Liang, W.; Ma, L.; Liu, Y.; Shi, G.; Wang, Y. Antifungal activity of extracts by supercritical carbon dioxide extraction from roots of Stellera chamaejasme L. and analysis of their constituents using GC-MS [J]. Inform Technol Agr Eng Springer 2012, 653–662. [Google Scholar]
  37. Vining, L.C.; Kelleher, W.J.; Schwarting, A.E. Oosporein production by a strain of Beauveria bassiana originally identified as Amanita muscaria. Can. J. Microbiol. 1962, 8, 931–933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Hamill, R.L.; Higgens, C.E.; Boaz, H.E.; Gorman, M. The structure of beauvericin, a new depsipeptide antibiotic toxic to Artemia salina. Tetrahedron Lett. 1969, 10, 4255–4258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Zimmermann, G. Review on safety of the entomopathogenic fungi Beauveria bassiana and Beauveria brongniartii. Biocontrol Sci. Technol. 2007, 17, 553–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Logrieco, A.; Moretti, A.; Castella, G.; Kostecki, M.; Golinski, P.; Ritieni, A.; Chelkowski, J. Beauvericin production by Fusarium species. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1998, 64, 3084–3088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Nagaoka, T.; Nakata, K.; Kouno, K. Antifungal activity of oosporein from an antagonistic fungus against Phytophthora infestans. Z. Naturforschung C 2004, 59, 302–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Wang, Q.; Xu, L. Beauvericin, a bioactive compound produced by fungi: A short review. Molecules 2012, 17, 2367–2377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Manning, R.O.; Wyatt, R.D. Comparative toxicity of Chaetomium contaminated corn and various chemical forms of oosporein in broiler chicks. Poultry Sci. 1984, 63, 251–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Golembiovska, O.; Tsurkan, A.; Vynogradov, B. Components of Prunella vulgaris L. Grown in Ukraine J. Pharmacognosy Phytochem. 2014, 2, 140–146. [Google Scholar]
  45. Bernotienë, G.; Nivinskienë, O.; Butkienë, R.; Mockutë, D. Chemical composition of essential oils of hops (Humulus lupulus L.) growing wild in Aukštaitija. Chemija 2004, 15, 31–36. [Google Scholar]
  46. Fischedick, J.T.; Hazekamp, A.; Erkelens, T.; Choi, Y.H.; Verpoorte, R. Metabolic fingerprinting of Cannabis sativa L., cannabinoids and terpenoids for chemotaxonomic and drug standardization purposes. Phytochem. 2010, 71, 2058–2073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Sieniawska, E.; Sawicki, R.; Golus, J.; Swatko-Ossor, M.; Ginalska, G.; Skalicka-Wozniak, K. Nigella damascena L. essential Oil—a valuable source of β-Elemene for antimicrobial testing. Molecules 2018, 23, 256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Mendanha, S.A.; Alonso, A. Effects of terpenes on fluidity and lipid extraction in phospholipid membranes. Biophys. Chem. 2015, 198, 45–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Barrero, A.F.; Quilez del Moral, J.F.; Lara, A.; Herrador, M.M. Antimicrobial activity of sesquiterpenes from the essential oil of Juniperus thurifera Wood. Planta Med. 2005, 71, 67–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Drage, S.; Mitter, B.; Tröls, C.; Muchugi, A.; Jamnadass, R.H.; Sessitsch, A.; Hadacek, F. Antimicrobial drimane sesquiterpenes and their effect on endophyte communities in the medical tree Warburgiau gandensis. Front. Microbiol. 2014, 5, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Monga, A.; Sharma, A. Chapter 9 - Natural products encompassing antituberculosis activities. Studies in Natural Products Chemistry. 2020, 64, 263–301. [Google Scholar]
  52. Zhai, B.; Zhang, N.; Han, X.; Li, Q.; Zhang, M.; Chen, X.; Li, G.; Zhang, R.; Chen, P.; Wang, W.; Li, C.; Xiang, Y.; Liu, S.; Duan, T.; Lou, J.; Xie, T.; Sui, X. Molecular targets of β-elemene, a herbal extract used in traditional Chinese medicine, and its potential role in cancer therapy: A review. Biomed. Pharmacoth. 2019, 14, 108812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Dong, T.; Yan, Y.; Chai, H.; Chen, S.; Xiong, X.; Sun, D.; Yu, Y.; Deng, L.; Cheng, F. Pyruvate kinase M2 affects liver cancer cell behavior through up-regulation of HIF-1α and Bcl-xL in culture. Biomed. Pharmacother 2015, 69, 277–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. van Niekerk, G.; Engelbrecht, A.M. Role of PKM2 in directing the metabolic fate of glucose in cancer: a potential therapeutic target, Cell Oncol. (Dordr.) 2018, 41, 343–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Sun, X.; Peng, Y.; Zhao, J.; Xie, Z.; Lei, X.; Tang, G. Discovery and development of tumor glycolysis rate-limiting enzyme inhibitors. Bioorganic Chem. 2021, 112, 104891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Pan, Y.; Wang, W.; Huang, S.; Ni, W.; Wei, Z.; Cao, Y.; Yu, S.; Jia, Q.; Wu, Y.; Chai, C.; Zheng, Q.; Zhang, L.; Wang, A., Sun; Huang, S.; Wang, S.; Chen, W.; Lu, Y. Beta-elemene inhibits breast cancer metastasis through blocking pyruvate kinase M2 dimerization and nuclear translocation. J. Cell Mol. Med., 2019, 23, 6846–6858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Glass, N.L.; Donaldson, G.C. Development of primer sets designed for use with the PCR to amplify conserved genes from filamentous ascomycetes. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1995, 61, 1323–1330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Johnson, D.M.; White, R.L.; Pereira, R.M.; Geden, C.J. Beauveria bassiana culturing and harvesting for bioassays with house flies. J. Insect Sci. 2020, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Elshafie, H.S.; Racioppi, R.; Bufo, S.A.; Camele, I. In vitro study of biological activity of four strains of Burkholderia gladioli pv. agaricicola and identification of their bioactive metabolites using GC–MS. Saudia J. Biol Sci. 2017, 24, 295–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Elshafie, H.S.; Viggiani, L.; Mostafa, M.S.; El-Hashash, M.A.; Bufo, S.A.; Camele, I. Biological activity and chemical identification of ornithine lipid produced by Burkholderia gladioli pv. agaricicola ICMP 11096 using LC-MS and NMR analyses. J. Biol. Res. 2017, 90, 96–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Sofo, A.; Elshafie, H.S.; Scopa, A.; Mang, S.M.; Camele, I. Impact of airborne zinc pollution on the antimicrobial activity of olive oil and the microbial metabolic profiles of Zn-contaminated soils in an Italian olive orchard. J. Trace Elem. Med. Biol. 2018, 49, 276–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Camele, I.; Grul’ová, D.; Elshafie, H.S. Chemical composition and antimicrobial properties of Mentha _ piperita cv. ‘Kristinka’ essential oil. Plants 2021, 10, 1567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Elshafie, H.S.; Camele, I.; Racioppi, R.; Scrano, L.; Iacobellis, N.S.; Bufo, S.A. In vitro antifungal activity of Burkholderia gladioli pv. agaricicola against some Phytopathogenic fungi. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2012, 13, 16291–16302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Antagonistic activity of B. bassiana UniB2439-3.
Figure 1. Antagonistic activity of B. bassiana UniB2439-3.
Preprints 70627 g001
Table 1. Antibacterial activity of diffusible metabolites from B. bassiana UniB2439-3.
Table 1. Antibacterial activity of diffusible metabolites from B. bassiana UniB2439-3.
Tested bacteria Diameter of inhibition zones (mm)
Exo-ME
16 mg/mL
Endo-ME
20 mg/mL
Tetracycline
1600 µg/mL
G+ve B. cereus 8,5±1,0ab 0,0±0,0c 20.8±1.1b
B. megaterium 10,0±1,9ab 4,0±1,7b 25.9±2.3ab
B. mojavensis 14,0±2,6a 0,0±0,0c 18.4±1.4b
C. michiganensis 12,5±2,2a 0,0±0,0c 39.5±2.5a
G-ve X. campestris 9,5±2,5ab 9,0±1,9a 23.5±1.7ab
X. vesicatoria 14,0±0,9a 0,0±0,0c 19.5±0.9b
P. aeruginosa 0,0±0,0c 6,5±2,8ab 10.6±0.7c
P. fluorescens 6,5±1,5b 4,5±1,7b 12.3±0.9c
Values followed by different letters in each column for each tested extract against all tested bacteria are significantly different at P < 0.05 according to one-way ANOVA combined with Tukey B post hoc test by using SPPS program. Data are expressed as the mean of inhibition zone diameter (mm) for three replicates ± SDs compared to controls ±SDs.
Table 2. GC-MS analysis of diffusible metabolites extracted from B. bassiana UniB2439-3.
Table 2. GC-MS analysis of diffusible metabolites extracted from B. bassiana UniB2439-3.
RTa (min) Area (%) Name M.Wtb
(g/mol)
Formula CASc Quality (%)
14.819 100.0 Hexanedioic acid, bis(2-ethylhexyl) ester 370 C22H42O4 000103-23-1 91
Where: a. RT: retention time; b. M.Wt: molecular weight, and c. CAS: registry number of chemical compound.
Table 3. GC-MS analysis of VOCs extracted from B. bassiana UniB2439-3.
Table 3. GC-MS analysis of VOCs extracted from B. bassiana UniB2439-3.
RT
(min)
Area(%) Name M.Wt
(g/mol)
Formula CAS Probability of identification
(%)
1.576 4.69 Ethanol 46,07 C2H5OH 000064-17-5 90
2.834 0.44 Butanal, 2-methyl 86 C5H10O 000096-17-3 90
5.372 00.63 2,4-Dimethyl-1-heptene 126.24 C9H18 019549-87-2 90
5.660 1.99 Octane, 4-methyl 128.25 C9H20 002216-34-4 93
10.459 6.98 β-elemenea 204.35 C15H24 000515-13-9 96
a. β-elemene: Cyclohexane, 1-ethenyl-1-methyl-2,4-bis(1-methylethenyl)-, [1S-(1.alpha.,2.beta.,4.beta.)].
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

Privacy Settings

© 2025 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated