Macklin, S.C.; Mariani, R.O.; Young, E.N.; Kish, R.; Cathline, K.A.; Robertson, G.; Martin, A.R. Intraspecific Leaf Trait Variation across and within Five Common Wine Grape Varieties. Plants2022, 11, 2792.
Macklin, S.C.; Mariani, R.O.; Young, E.N.; Kish, R.; Cathline, K.A.; Robertson, G.; Martin, A.R. Intraspecific Leaf Trait Variation across and within Five Common Wine Grape Varieties. Plants 2022, 11, 2792.
Macklin, S.C.; Mariani, R.O.; Young, E.N.; Kish, R.; Cathline, K.A.; Robertson, G.; Martin, A.R. Intraspecific Leaf Trait Variation across and within Five Common Wine Grape Varieties. Plants2022, 11, 2792.
Macklin, S.C.; Mariani, R.O.; Young, E.N.; Kish, R.; Cathline, K.A.; Robertson, G.; Martin, A.R. Intraspecific Leaf Trait Variation across and within Five Common Wine Grape Varieties. Plants 2022, 11, 2792.
Abstract
Variability in traits forming the Leaf Economics Spectrum (LES) among and within crop species play a key role in governing agroecosystem processes. However, studies evaluating the extent, causes, and consequences of within-species variation in LES traits for some of the world’s most common crops remain limited. We quantified variation in nine leaf traits measured across 90 vines of five wine grape (Vitis vinifera) varieties at two ontogenetic stages. Grape traits covary along an intraspecific LES, in patterns similar to those documented in wild plants. Across varieties, high rates of photosynthesis (A), and leaf nitrogen (N) concentrations, are coupled with low leaf mass per area (LMA), while the opposite suite of traits defines the “resource conserving end” of this intraspecific LES in grape. Variety identity predicted of leaf physiological (A) and morphological traits (i.e., leaf area and leaf mass), while leaf chemical traits and LMA were best explained by ontogenetic stage. All varieties expressed greater resource conserving trait syndromes (i.e., higher LMA, lower N, lower Amass) later in the growing season. Traits related to leaf hydraulics, including instantaneous water-use efficiency (WUE), were unrelated to LES and other resource capture traits, and were better explained by spatial location. Our results highlight the relative contributions of genetic vs. phenotypic factors in structuring this variation and point to a key role of domestication in governing trait relationships in the world’s crops.
Biology and Life Sciences, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Copyright:
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
,
,
,
*
