Version 1
: Received: 2 June 2022 / Approved: 7 June 2022 / Online: 7 June 2022 (03:57:22 CEST)
Version 2
: Received: 28 June 2022 / Approved: 29 June 2022 / Online: 29 June 2022 (03:15:06 CEST)
Version 3
: Received: 13 July 2022 / Approved: 14 July 2022 / Online: 14 July 2022 (04:17:43 CEST)
Version 4
: Received: 15 August 2022 / Approved: 16 August 2022 / Online: 16 August 2022 (03:40:03 CEST)
Version 5
: Received: 2 July 2023 / Approved: 3 July 2023 / Online: 3 July 2023 (09:44:52 CEST)
Version 6
: Received: 16 June 2024 / Approved: 17 June 2024 / Online: 17 June 2024 (08:11:27 CEST)
Version 7
: Received: 3 August 2024 / Approved: 4 August 2024 / Online: 5 August 2024 (08:18:20 CEST)
How to cite:
Senarath Dayathilake, K. L. Consciousness and Life after Death in the Evolution of Intelligence. Preprints2022, 2022060092. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202206.0092.v3
Senarath Dayathilake, K. L. Consciousness and Life after Death in the Evolution of Intelligence. Preprints 2022, 2022060092. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202206.0092.v3
Senarath Dayathilake, K. L. Consciousness and Life after Death in the Evolution of Intelligence. Preprints2022, 2022060092. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202206.0092.v3
APA Style
Senarath Dayathilake, K. L. (2022). Consciousness and Life after Death in the Evolution of Intelligence. Preprints. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202206.0092.v3
Chicago/Turabian Style
Senarath Dayathilake, K. L. 2022 "Consciousness and Life after Death in the Evolution of Intelligence" Preprints. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202206.0092.v3
Abstract
It seems that no scientific study has been able to find evidence of an afterlife, and the mechanism of consciousness is two of the most challenging questions. Here, I show a hypothesis for consciousness and the probability of an afterlife through three simple thought experiments and theoretical evidence, yet more studies need to precisely understand the mechanism. I found that consciousness might be discussed from three fundamental theories: (1) quantum-level particles of functional neurons in the brain according to quantum mechanics, (2) the brain and its more significant matter than quantum particles behave to general relativity, and (3) a new theory is needed if any other additional mechanism exists. Here, I hypothesize that when a person or animal dies, the selection of a new neuronal system's characteristic of a new life might depend on the characteristics of the finally evolving ultraquantum genome. Here, I suggest that the positive or adverse evolution of the ultraquantum genome depends on the natural evolution of the materialistic brain's cognition, including intelligence. When a brain dies, the ultraquantum particles might emit from the dead brain and simultaneously bond with the suitable early vacant nervous system anywhere in the universe/s, forming a new life with the impact of new nurture.
Keywords
Cognitive psychology; determinism; materialism; new physics; theoretical hypothesis; thought ex-periment; ultraquantum particles
Subject
Social Sciences, Cognitive Science
Copyright:
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received:
14 July 2022
Commenter:
Kande Lekamalaya Senarath Dayathilake
Commenter's Conflict of Interests:
Author
Comment:
Sir, I edited the previous version to improve the manuscript's clarity, along with corrections to the argument. Thanks! Take care, senarath Dayathilake, Sri Lanka
Commenter: Kande Lekamalaya Senarath Dayathilake
Commenter's Conflict of Interests: Author