PreprintReviewVersion 1Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed
Preparation methods for Graphene, Metal and Polymer-based Composites for EMI Shielding Materials: State of the Art of Conventional and Machine Learning Methods
Ayub, S.; Guan, B.H.; Ahmad, F.; Javed, M.F.; Mosavi, A.; Felde, I. Preparation Methods for Graphene Metal and Polymer Based Composites for EMI Shielding Materials: State of the Art Review of the Conventional and Machine Learning Methods. Metals2021, 11, 1164.
Ayub, S.; Guan, B.H.; Ahmad, F.; Javed, M.F.; Mosavi, A.; Felde, I. Preparation Methods for Graphene Metal and Polymer Based Composites for EMI Shielding Materials: State of the Art Review of the Conventional and Machine Learning Methods. Metals 2021, 11, 1164.
Ayub, S.; Guan, B.H.; Ahmad, F.; Javed, M.F.; Mosavi, A.; Felde, I. Preparation Methods for Graphene Metal and Polymer Based Composites for EMI Shielding Materials: State of the Art Review of the Conventional and Machine Learning Methods. Metals2021, 11, 1164.
Ayub, S.; Guan, B.H.; Ahmad, F.; Javed, M.F.; Mosavi, A.; Felde, I. Preparation Methods for Graphene Metal and Polymer Based Composites for EMI Shielding Materials: State of the Art Review of the Conventional and Machine Learning Methods. Metals 2021, 11, 1164.
Abstract
The electromagnetic inference is an issue from decades, where working for a better shielding material is still on-going. The purpose of this study is to review the existing methods in the formation of graphene, metal and polymer-based composites. Study indicates that in graphene and metal-based composites, the utilization of alternating deposition method showed the highest shielding effectiveness, whereas, in polymer-based composite, the utilization of chemical vapor deposition method showed highest shielding effectiveness. However, this review reveals that still there is a gap in the literature in terms of the selection of the method. Although there are various available methods which researchers adopt as per their convenience, none of the studies makes a comparison of the methods to form a similar composite. Therefore, as a future gap researcher needs to adopt various methods to form a single composite and then make a comparison of shielding effectiveness. This act will be useful for future researchers to select the appropriate method.
Copyright:
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
