Version 1
: Received: 25 December 2020 / Approved: 29 December 2020 / Online: 29 December 2020 (14:26:10 CET)
How to cite:
Kim, T.; Lee, J.; Kang, S.; Chae, K.; Choi, S.; Song, Y. Comparison of Kinematic Characteristics of Upper Body according to the Shooting of Elite Disabled Archery Athletes. Preprints2020, 2020120729. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202012.0729.v1
Kim, T.; Lee, J.; Kang, S.; Chae, K.; Choi, S.; Song, Y. Comparison of Kinematic Characteristics of Upper Body according to the Shooting of Elite Disabled Archery Athletes. Preprints 2020, 2020120729. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202012.0729.v1
Kim, T.; Lee, J.; Kang, S.; Chae, K.; Choi, S.; Song, Y. Comparison of Kinematic Characteristics of Upper Body according to the Shooting of Elite Disabled Archery Athletes. Preprints2020, 2020120729. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202012.0729.v1
APA Style
Kim, T., Lee, J., Kang, S., Chae, K., Choi, S., & Song, Y. (2020). Comparison of Kinematic Characteristics of Upper Body according to the Shooting of Elite Disabled Archery Athletes. Preprints. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202012.0729.v1
Chicago/Turabian Style
Kim, T., Sang-Hyup Choi and Yong-Gwan Song. 2020 "Comparison of Kinematic Characteristics of Upper Body according to the Shooting of Elite Disabled Archery Athletes" Preprints. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202012.0729.v1
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to compare and analyze the kinematic characteristics of the upper limb segments during the archery shooting of Paralympic Wheelchair Class archers (ARW2 - second wheelchair class – paraplegia or comparable disability) and Paralympic Standing Class archers (ARST - standing archery class – loss of 25 points in the upper limbs or lower limbs), where archers are classified according to their disability grade among elite disabled archers. The participants of this study were selected as seven elite athletes with disabilities, 4 ARW2, and 3 ARST. The analysis variables were 1) the time required for each phase, 2) the angle of inclination of the body center, 3) the change of trajectory of body center, and 4) the change of movement locus of bow center by phase when performing six shots in total. The ARW2 group showed a longer time than the ARST group, and the angle of the body did not show a significant difference between the two groups. Although there was no significant difference in the mean score between the two groups, it was judged that kinematic performance according to each group was, in that there was a measurable variation in kinematic variables.
Keywords
disability; ARW2; ARST; tilt angle; trajectory
Subject
Social Sciences, Cognitive Science
Copyright:
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
