Short Note
Version 8
Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed
Another Criterion For The Riemann Hypothesis
Version 1
: Received: 24 February 2020 / Approved: 25 February 2020 / Online: 25 February 2020 (12:21:49 CET)
Version 2 : Received: 27 February 2020 / Approved: 27 February 2020 / Online: 27 February 2020 (10:49:49 CET)
Version 3 : Received: 10 March 2020 / Approved: 11 March 2020 / Online: 11 March 2020 (16:04:28 CET)
Version 4 : Received: 31 March 2020 / Approved: 2 April 2020 / Online: 2 April 2020 (18:25:32 CEST)
Version 5 : Received: 20 April 2020 / Approved: 22 April 2020 / Online: 22 April 2020 (09:48:30 CEST)
Version 6 : Received: 3 June 2020 / Approved: 4 June 2020 / Online: 4 June 2020 (13:22:40 CEST)
Version 7 : Received: 6 June 2020 / Approved: 8 June 2020 / Online: 8 June 2020 (10:31:19 CEST)
Version 8 : Received: 2 July 2021 / Approved: 6 July 2021 / Online: 6 July 2021 (12:38:05 CEST)
Version 9 : Received: 14 October 2021 / Approved: 14 October 2021 / Online: 14 October 2021 (14:15:38 CEST)
Version 2 : Received: 27 February 2020 / Approved: 27 February 2020 / Online: 27 February 2020 (10:49:49 CET)
Version 3 : Received: 10 March 2020 / Approved: 11 March 2020 / Online: 11 March 2020 (16:04:28 CET)
Version 4 : Received: 31 March 2020 / Approved: 2 April 2020 / Online: 2 April 2020 (18:25:32 CEST)
Version 5 : Received: 20 April 2020 / Approved: 22 April 2020 / Online: 22 April 2020 (09:48:30 CEST)
Version 6 : Received: 3 June 2020 / Approved: 4 June 2020 / Online: 4 June 2020 (13:22:40 CEST)
Version 7 : Received: 6 June 2020 / Approved: 8 June 2020 / Online: 8 June 2020 (10:31:19 CEST)
Version 8 : Received: 2 July 2021 / Approved: 6 July 2021 / Online: 6 July 2021 (12:38:05 CEST)
Version 9 : Received: 14 October 2021 / Approved: 14 October 2021 / Online: 14 October 2021 (14:15:38 CEST)
How to cite: Vega, F. Another Criterion For The Riemann Hypothesis. Preprints 2020, 2020020379. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202002.0379.v8 Vega, F. Another Criterion For The Riemann Hypothesis. Preprints 2020, 2020020379. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202002.0379.v8
Abstract
Let's define $\delta(x) = (\sum_{{q\leq x}}{\frac{1}{q}}-\log \log x-B)$, where $B \approx 0.2614972128$ is the Meissel-Mertens constant. The Robin theorem states that $\delta(x)$ changes sign infinitely often. For $x \geq 2$, Nicolas defined the function $u(x) = \sum_{q > x} \left(\log( \frac{q}{q-1}) - \frac{1}{q} \right)$ and proved that $0 < u(x) \leq \frac{1}{2 \times (x - 1)}$. We define the another function $\varpi(x) = \left(\sum_{{q\leq x}}{\frac{1}{q}}-\log \log \theta(x)-B \right)$, where $\theta(x)$ is the Chebyshev function. Using the Nicolas theorem, we demonstrate that the Riemann Hypothesis is true if and only if the inequality $\varpi(x) > u(x)$ is satisfied for all number $x \geq 3$. Consequently, we show that when the inequality $\varpi(x) \leq 0$ is satisfied for some number $x \geq 3$, then the Riemann Hypothesis should be false. Moreover, if the inequalities $\delta(x) \leq 0$ and $\theta(x) \geq x$ are satisfied for some number $x \geq 3$, then the Riemann Hypothesis should be false. In addition, we know that $\lim_{{x\to \infty }} \varpi(x) = 0$ because of $\lim_{{x\to \infty }} \delta(x) = 0$ and $\lim_{{x \to \infty }} \frac{\theta(x)}{x} = 1$.
Keywords
Riemann hypothesis; Nicolas theorem; prime numbers; Chebyshev function
Subject
Computer Science and Mathematics, Algebra and Number Theory
Copyright: This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Comments (1)
We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.
Leave a public commentSend a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Commenter: Frank Vega
Commenter's Conflict of Interests: Author