Version 1
: Received: 6 August 2018 / Approved: 6 August 2018 / Online: 6 August 2018 (12:17:10 CEST)
Version 2
: Received: 31 August 2018 / Approved: 31 August 2018 / Online: 31 August 2018 (12:09:40 CEST)
Version 3
: Received: 7 September 2018 / Approved: 10 September 2018 / Online: 10 September 2018 (10:58:25 CEST)
Izawa, A.; Fripp, M. Multi-Objective Control of Air Conditioning Improves Cost, Comfort and System Energy Balance. Energies2018, 11, 2373.
Izawa, A.; Fripp, M. Multi-Objective Control of Air Conditioning Improves Cost, Comfort and System Energy Balance. Energies 2018, 11, 2373.
Izawa, A.; Fripp, M. Multi-Objective Control of Air Conditioning Improves Cost, Comfort and System Energy Balance. Energies2018, 11, 2373.
Izawa, A.; Fripp, M. Multi-Objective Control of Air Conditioning Improves Cost, Comfort and System Energy Balance. Energies 2018, 11, 2373.
Abstract
A new model predictive control (MPC) algorithm is used to select optimal air conditioning setpoints for a commercial office building, considering variable electricity prices, weather, occupancy and lighting. This algorithm, Cost-Comfort Particle Swarm Optimization (CCPSO), is the first to combine a realistic, smooth representation of occupants’ willingness to pay for thermal comfort with a bottom-up, non-linear model of the building and air conditioning system under control. We find that using a quadratic preference function for temperature can yield solutions that are both more comfortable and lower-cost than previous work that used a ``brick wall'' preference function with no preference for further cooling within an allowed temperature band and infinite aversion to going outside the allowed band. Using historical pricing data for a summer month in Chicago, CCPSO provided a 3\% reduction in costs vs. a ``brick-wall'' MPC approach with similar comfort and 13\% reduction in costs vs. a standard night setback strategy. CCPSO also reduced peak-hours demand by 3\% vs. the ``brick-wall'' strategy and 15\% vs. standard night-setback. At the same time, the CCPSO strategy increased off-peak energy consumption by 15\% vs. the ``brick-wall'' strategy. This may be valuable for power systems integrating large amounts of renewable power, which can otherwise become uneconomic due to saturation of demand during off-peak hours.
Copyright:
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.