Preprint Article Version 1 This version is not peer-reviewed

Implant Stability of Biological Hydroxyapatites Used in Dentistry

Version 1 : Received: 31 May 2017 / Approved: 1 June 2017 / Online: 1 June 2017 (06:19:41 CEST)

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

Ramírez Fernández, M.P.; Gehrke, S.A.; Mazón, P.; Calvo-Guirado, J.L.; De Aza, P.N. Implant Stability of Biological Hydroxyapatites Used in Dentistry. Materials 2017, 10, 644. Ramírez Fernández, M.P.; Gehrke, S.A.; Mazón, P.; Calvo-Guirado, J.L.; De Aza, P.N. Implant Stability of Biological Hydroxyapatites Used in Dentistry. Materials 2017, 10, 644.

Journal reference: Materials 2017, 10, 644
DOI: 10.3390/ma10060644

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to monitor implant stability after sinus floor elevation with two biomaterials during the first 6 months of healing by a resonance frequency analysis (RFA), and how physico-chemical properties affect the implant stability quotient (ISQ) at the placement and healing sites. Bilateral maxillary sinus augmentation was performed in 10 patients in a split-mouth design using a bobine HA (BBM) as a control and porcine HA (PBM). Six months after sinus lifting, 60 implants were placed in the posterior maxilla. The ISQ was recorded on the day of surgery from RFA at T1 (baseline), T2 (3 months), and T3 (6 months). Statistically significant differences were found in the ISQ values during the evaluation period. The ISQ (baseline) was 63.8±2.97 for BBM and 62.6±2.11 for PBM. The ISQ (T2) was ~ 73.5±4.21 and 67±4.99, respectively. The ISQ (T3) was ~ 74.65±2.93 and 72.9±2.63, respectively. All the used HAs provide osseointegration and statistical increases in the ISQ at baseline, T2 and T3 (follow-up), respectively. The BBM, sintered at high temperature with high crystallinity and low porosity, presented higher stability, which demonstrates that variations in the physico-chemical properties of a bone substitute material clearly influence implant stability.

Subject Areas

hydroxyapatite, xenografts; implant design; implant surface

Readers' Comments and Ratings (0)

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
Rate this article
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0
Leave a public comment

×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.