Aim: aim of this study is to evaluate the clinical and radiographic healing after repairing mechanical furcal perforations that occurred in primary molars by using MTA (Mineral Trioxide Aggregate) and search in some factors that may affect the prognosis of the treatment. Materials & Methods: we had 34 primary molars in 32 children aged 5–10 years, were treated by using MTA material after the occurrence of furcal perforation during pulpotomy procedure. Cases had been followed clinically and radiographically within 12 months. Statistical analyses were performed at p-value = 0.05. Results: All teeth were asymptomatic at the first week. Overall success rate was 79.3%. There was no significant statistically differences between overall-success rates according to the perforation size and continues bleeding in the furcation area (p-value > 0.05). Conclusions: Iatrogenic furcal perforations that may occur during pulpotomy in primary molars can be treated successfully by using MTA, and small sized-perforations may have more favorable prognosis than the large ones. Iatrogenic furcal perforations that may occur during pulpotomy in primary molars can be treated successfully by using MTA, and small sized- perforations may have more favorable prognosis than the large ones.

Introduction: The aim of the present systematic review was to evaluate the clinical and radiographic success of partial pulpotomies in deep caries processes or post-eruptive defects in young, vital permanent teeth. Methods: Electronic databases, PubMed, Scopus, and Embase, were searched, followed by a manual search. Randomized controlled trials evaluating partial pulpo-tomy with a follow-up period of ≥12 months were included. Meta-analyses using a random effect model were performed. Results: A total of 3.127 articles were retrieved, and after duplicate re-moval, 2.642 were screened by title and abstract; 1 additional article was found during the manual search in the reference lists, and 79 were identified. Finally, 6 papers were included in the review. Regardless of the partial pulpotomy modalities or material used, there were no signifi-cant differences between clinical and radiographic success rates (cumulative success rate 91,8%-92,3%, respectively). Five studies were included in the meta-analysis that did not indicate any statistically significant differences in success rates when Mineral Trioxide Aggregate was compared to other materials (95% CI 0,239 to 1,016 p=0.055). Conclusion: This research system-atically evaluates the evidence and summarises the available data on partial pulpotomy in young permanent teeth. Given its high clinical and radiographic success rate, partial pulpotomy should be considered when vital pulpal therapy needs to be performed in highly damaged young per-manent teeth, as this procedure provides a biological benefit and allows more invasive endodon-tic treatments to be postponed.

A partial or complete pulpotomy is a type of vital pulp therapy (VPT) that aims to remove the in-flamed, infected pulp, leaving behind healthy, vital pulp that is capable of healing. VPT has gained renewed popularity as a treatment option in permanent mature posterior teeth with irre-versible/moderate-severe pulpitis, its high success rates matching that of root canal treatment (RCT). There is currently no consensus regarding diagnostic and prognostic predictors of success of pulpotomies for managing such cases. Therefore, we conducted a scoping review to identify and analyze how these factors affect the outcome of treatment. A literature search using the PRISMA guidelines was undertaken using PubMed and Scopus on July 7, 2023. A total of 22 studies met the inclusion criteria and were qualitatively analyzed by two reviewers. The follow-ing diagnostic and prognostic factors were recognized and discussed; presenting signs and symptoms, periapical diagnosis, bleeding time, indicators of inflammation (bleeding time, con-centration of inflammatory biomarkers), patient age and medical status, the depth, activity and location of caries, and restorative factors. Based on the studies assessed, there is limited evidence to support their prognostic value. Further research is necessary to identify solid predictors of outcome.