The impact of systemic vascular resistance (SVR) in hypertrophic (HCM) and amyloid cardio-myopathies has been seldom investigated. We studied pressure-strain loop derived myocardial work (MW) indices and SVR in patients with either sarcomere HCM or wild type transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis (ATTR), presented with heart failure and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (HFpEF) at the outpatient cardiology units at Messina and Catania University Hospitals (Italy). Patients were in sinus rhythm and needed to have good transthoracic ultrasound imaging quality to undergo transthoracic strain-echocardiography. Other than conventional parameters, SVR and GWI (global work index) were measured. Based on cross-tabulation (a way to assess the ventricular-arterial coupling), the patients were then classified in 4 classes according to the cut-off values suggested by previous studies of 1,440 dyne/s/cm-5 for SVR (Stefadouros et al., 1973) and 1576 mm Hg% for GWI (Olsen et al., 2022). Sixty patients, 30 in each group, aged 61±16 years, 78% males, were studied. HCM were younger than ATTR patients and in a better clinical status (23% HCM vs 77% ATTR were NYHA class 3, p<0.001). Overall, 51 patients (85%) showed high SVR, of whom 21 were HCM (70%) and 30 ATTR (100%) (p<0.005). Both, SVR and GWI were impaired (the poorest class C) in 43% HCM patients (with greater left ventricular concentric hypertrophy) vs 93% of ATTR patients (in advanced NYHA class) (p<0.001). In conclusion, assessing SVR and GWI in HFpEF patients with HCM or ATTR can help clinicians to interpret the pathophysiological and clinical features of such complex diseases.

Systemic inflammation and coronary microvascular endothelial dysfunction are essential pathophysiological factors in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) that support the use of statins. The pleiotropic properties of statins, such as anti-inflammatory, antihypertrophic, antifibrotic, and antioxidant effects, are generally accepted and may be beneficial in HF, especially in HFpEF. Numerous observational clinical trials have consistently shown a beneficial prognostic effect of statins in patients with HFpEF, while the results of two larger trials in patients with HFrEF have been controversial. Such differences may be related to a more pronounced impact of the pleiotropic properties of statins on the pathophysiology of HFpEF and pro-inflammatory comorbidities (arterial hypertension, diabetes mellitus, obesity, chronic kidney disease) that are more common in HFpEF. This review discusses the potential mechanisms of statin action that may be beneficial for patients with HFpEF, as well as clinical trials that have evaluated the statin effects on left ventricular diastolic function and clinical outcomes in patients with HFpEF.

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) remains a poorly characterized syndrome with many dark aspects related to different patients profile, various associated risk factors and wide aetiologies. It comprises several pathophysiological pathways related to endothelial dysfunction, myocardial fibrosis, extracellular matrix deposition and high inflammatory response. Up to now, it has been described only for clinical appearance and most common associated risk factors without an effective characterization of biological processes responsible for cardiovascular deteriorations. Recent advances in laboratory and metabolomic researches showed that HFpEF appears strictly related to specific cells and molecular mechanisms dysregulation. Some biomarkers are capable to early identify these processes adding new insights into diagnosis and risk stratification. Additionally recent advances on intermediate metabolites reflecting provide relevant information on intrinsic cellular and energetic substrate alterations. The systematic combination of clinical imaging and laboratory data may lead to a precision medicine approach providing prognostic and therapeutic advantages. Current review reports traditional and emerging biomarkers recently investigated in HFpEF setting, and it purpose a new diagnostic approach based on integrative information achieved from risk factors burden, hemodynamic dysfunction and biomarkers signature partnership.

fibrillation (AF) and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Join us on a journey that unravels the mysteries of molecular intricacies, delves into advanced imaging techniques, and sheds light on therapeutic pathways. Unveiling the role of cardiac amyloidosis, particularly sub-clinical isolated cardiac amyloidosis (ICA), the narrative unfolds the heightened risk of AF in the elderly. State-of-the-art imaging techniques like cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) and molecular imaging step into the spotlight, unraveling diagnostic and prognostic nuances of AF and HFpEF. Embarking on the molecular voyage, the article navigates through next-generation sequencing and comprehensive genomic profiling, shedding light on genetic alterations shaping the AF-HFpEF landscape. This molecular compass lays the groundwork for personalized medicine, illuminating pathways to identify therapeutic bullseyes and biomarkers. In the realm of medical strategies, the discussion homes in on the promising notes struck by SGLT2 inhibitors, particularly dapagliflozin, orchestrating a reduction in AF burden. Characters like spironolactone and dronedarone make appearances, each weaving a distinct tale, revealing their potential roles in steering the ship for AF- HFpEF patients. The subplot involving obesity in HFpEF unfolds, with the LEGACY study portraying the benefits of weight reduction. The pivotal intervention of catheter ablation emerges as the hero, boasting positive outcomes in reducing hospitalization rates and overall mortality for AF-HFpEF patients. However, cautionary tales echo about its impact on left atrial function, adding layers of complexity that beckon careful consideration and monitoring. Amidst the narrative, critical discussions unfold about the limitations of current research, echoing the need to define acute heart failure, refine imaging techniques, and tailor management strategies. The narrative passionately advocates for a personalized touch in addressing AF-HFpEF, recognizing the unique blend of clinical and molecular personas. In essence, this review paints a vivid mural of AF-HFpEF, skillfully bridging the realms of molecular intricacies and the artistry of clinical management.

Objective: We determined, in stable ambulatory heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) subjects and matched controls, the capability of a novel blood based cardiac-specific cBIN1 Score (CS) to diagnose heart failure and prognosticate future hospitalization. Background: Heart failure (HF) poses a costly health care burden worldwide with rising prevalence. Abnormal calcium signaling is intrinsic to HF pathophysiology and correlates with reduced expression of a cardiac membrane scaffolding protein, cardiac bridging integrator 1 (cBIN1). We hypothesize that CS, a numerical score derived from plasma cBIN1 concentration, is a diagnostic and prognostic biomarker of HF. Methods: Plasma cBIN1 is quantified by an ELISA test, and CS is calculated as the natural log of the normalized reciprocal of plasma cBIN1 concentration. We determined CS among 52 clinically stable individuals with HFpEF (LVEF ≥ 50%) (mean age 57 ± 15 years old, 63% men) and 104 age and sex matched volunteers with no known history of HF. We obtained plasma concentrations of NT-proBNP, a marker of volume status, as comparison. Baseline co-morbidities and one year longitudinal clinical information were obtained through electronic medical records. Results: Median CS is 0 (IQR -0.4 – 0.6) in the control cohort and is increased to 1.8 in the HFpEF cohort (IQR 1.5 – 2.3, p < 0.0001). For HFpEF diagnosis, CS has a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) area under the curve (AUC) of 0.94 (95% CI 0.95 – 0.99) and NT-proBNP of 0.89 (95% CI 0.83 – 0.95). Kaplan-Meier analysis of one year cardiovascular hospitalizations reveals that HFpEF patients with CS ≥ 1.8 have a hazard ratio (HR) of 4.0 (95% CI 1.4 – 11.2, p=0.009). Combining CS ≥ 1.8 with NT-proBNP ≥ 300 pg/mL, increases HR to 21.4 (95% CI 2.7 – 171.6, p=0.004). Conclusions: In a cohort of stable ambulatory HF patients with cardiomyopathies of multiple etiologies and preserved ejection fraction, a positive CS correlates with worsening myocardial health and predicts future hospitalization. CS, a marker of cardiac muscle health, provides a novel index to informing the management of stable ambulatory HF patients.