Honey has been employed for the treatment of wounds and diseases for ancient time, thanks to its antimicrobial and curative properties. This study aims to present the biochemical characteristics, including the amount of sugar, total phenols, phenolic chemicals, antioxidant properties, and antibacterial activities of a specific type of French honey (Sologne summer forest) in comparison with a manuka honey. According to our findings, the Manuka honey tested has 23% fewer polyphenols total than Sologne summer forest honey. The results showed that the Sologne summer honey had a different polyphenols profile than Manuka honey with specific polyphenol like p- Hydroxybenzoic acid. Additionally, the antioxidant activity of the two honeys is comparable (9 μmole Trolox.g-1 honey). Furthermore, the antibacterial activity of the two honeys is comparable against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus. Our research indicates for the first time that there are significant nutritional and biological potentials for a French honey from the Sologne summer forest.

Bees have long been used as a bioindicator of environmental quality. They have the capacity to bio-accumulate various pollutants in cities such as PAHs and heavy metals, but they are also very sensitive to other pollutants in rural areas such as pesticides. The lethal and sub-lethal impacts of pesticides on bees have been extensively studied. However, studies often focus on a single molecule at a same time and rarely on a cocktail of pesticides. The oxidant stress in response to metals and NOx was also measure, but no studies were engaged on the impact of PAHs on honeybees. The aim of this study was to measure the oxidative stress in bees in response to the chronic ingestion of a mixture of pesticides (representative of pollutants in rural areas) on the first hand and a mixture of PAHs (representative of pollutants in urban areas) on the other hand, compared to a control group. We also wanted to determine whether this tool is effective in detecting environmental measures aimed at reducing pollution in urban and rural areas.

The presence of the mite, Varroa destructor, requires the use of acaricide treatments in most honeybee colonies. Amitraz is one of the most common acaricide substances used by beekeepers. Some Varroa mite populations have developed resistance to amitraz leading to a loss of efficacy of amitraz-based treatments. Two products, Apivar and Supatraz were applied in the same apiary. Both treatments are amitraz-based but have a different galenics. Thanks to field data, a dynamic model was used to simulate the action of Apivar and Supatraz on the mite population. We consider two parameters to compare the products: daily mortality rate and treatment duration. In the field, the percentage of efficacy between the two products was not significantly different but Supatraz kills mite faster and decreases 90% of the mite infestation in 28.4 days compared to 50.9 days for Apivar. Thanks to modelling, we showed the daily impact of the two different products on mite population. Supatraz has a higher daily mortality rate during the first two weeks than Apivar. Supatraz requires a lower efficacy to stabilize the varroa mite population due to its faster release of active ingredient than Apivar, needing a shorter period to achieve the same result. Depending on the model, Supatraz conserve a good efficacy for low resistant mites but not for high resistant mites. These results show that the comparison of the efficacy of two products with different characteristics (duration of treatment and daily mortality rate) should be analyzed with caution.