(1) Background: Thrombophilia is a tendency towards hypercoagulability, and it is increased by pregnancy, and peaking around delivery.; (2) Methods: 80 Eighty thrombophilia patients admitted for delivery between 1/10/2017 and 1/12/2021 were prospectively studied, together with 80 eighty age- and para-matched control patients. Patients were admitted for delivery at term by means of cesarean section. The inflammation indexes from the complete blood count values analysis, in during both the 24 hours before and the 24 hours after labor—, extracted from the hospital’s medical records—, were calculated, and then correlated with uterine involution.; (3) Results: In pregnant patients treated for thrombophilia patients, the patients who did not manage to have close their uterine cavity closed with in the first 24-48 hours had significantly higher SII and AISI inflammation indexes SII and AISI , than the onesthose who did manage to have their uterine cavity closed their uterine cavity. In pregnant patients treated for thrombophilia patients, MLR is higher in patients without the Rh factor than in those with the Rh factor. In non-thrombophilia patients, PLR was significantly higher as compared to treated thrombophilia patients. In non-thrombophilia patients, MCVL increased with age and, before labor, while SII and AISI increased with age, postpartum. ; (4) Conclusions: There may be an underlying inflammation state that persisted despite treatment in some pregnant thrombophilia pregnant patients.

(1) Background: Thrombophilia is a tendency towards hypercoagulability, and it is increased by pregnancy, peaking around delivery. Research question: does thrombophilia stimulate the in-flammatory state of the patient, already suppressed by pregnancy? (2) Methods: Eighty thrombo-philia patients admitted for delivery between 1/10/2017 and 1/12/2021 were prospectively stud-ied, together with eighty age- and para-matched control patients. Patients were admitted for de-livery at term by means of cesarean section. The inflammation indexes from the complete blood count values analysis during both the 24 hours before and after labor—extracted from the hospi-tal’s medical records—were calculated and then correlated with uterine involution. (3) Results: Except for the PLR, most of the numerous inflammation indexes studied were not significantly different in treated thrombophilia patients, before and after delivery, compared to non-thrombophilia patients. Only when we split the patients, based on the uterine haematometra in the first 24-48 hours postpartum, we found out that the few treated thrombophilia patients with haematometra (14 with haematometra out of 79 with treated thrombophilia) had elevated SII and AISI antepartum. In pregnant patients treated for thrombophilia, MLR is higher in pa-tients without the Rh factor than in those with the Rh factor. In non-thrombophilia patients, MCVL and NLPR increased with age and before labor, while SII and AISI increased with age postpartum. (4) Conclusions: Thrombophilia did not stimulate the inflammatory state of the pa-tient, already suppressed by pregnancy.

(1) Background: The prediction of cervical lesions evolution is a challenge for clinicians. The prospective study aimed to determine and compare the predictive accuracy of cytology, HPV genotyping, and p16/Ki67 dual staining alone or in combination with personal risk factors for the prediction of progression, regression or persistence of cervical lesions in human papillomavirus (HPV)-infected patients; (2) Methods: This prospective study included HPV-positive patients with or without cervical lesions that underwent follow-up. Descriptive statistics and sensitivity analysis for individual or combined index tests were used for data analysis; (3) Results: The highest predictive performance for the progression of cervical lesions was achieved by a model that comprised a Pap smear suggestive of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL), the presence of 16/18 HPV strains, a positive p16/Ki67 dual staining result along with the presence of at least 3 clinical risk factors, which had a sensitivity (Se) of 74.42%, a specificity of 97.92%, an area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) of 0.961, and an accuracy of 90.65%. The prediction of cervical lesions regression or persistence was modest; (4) Conclusions: Multiple testing or new biomarkers should be used to improve HPV-positive patient surveillance, especially for cervical lesion regression or persistence prediction.