Preprint
Review

This version is not peer-reviewed.

Lignin-Derived Biochar in Biorefineries: Linking Structure-Property Relationships to Emerging Contaminant Removal and Controlled Release Applications

Submitted:

22 May 2026

Posted:

25 May 2026

You are already at the latest version

Abstract
Lignin is an abundant aromatic biopolymer generated as a major by-product in lignocellulosic biorefineries, and its efficient valorization is essential to improve process sustainability and economic viability. Among current upgrading strategies, the conversion of lignin into lignin-derived biochar (LDB) has emerged as a promising route due to its high carbon yield, scalable production, and tunable physicochemical properties. This review examines lignin-to-biochar conversion within the biorefinery context, emphasizing the interconnections between lignin structure, thermochemical processing, and resulting material properties. The influence of different technical lignins (kraft, organosolv, and soda) and conversion pathways, including pyrolysis and hydrothermal carbonization, is discussed. LDB materials exhibit strong potential in the removal of emerging contaminants, such as pharmaceuticals, pesticides, and PFAS, as well as in controlled release systems for agrochemicals. Despite recent progress, key challenges remain, including limited reproducibility across studies, insufficiently established predictive structure-property relationships, and the need for validation under realistic environmental conditions. Overall, LDB represents a scalable and versatile platform for lignin valorization, contributing to the development of integrated and sustainable biorefineries within a circular bioeconomy framework. This review provides a conceptual framework for the rational design of lignin-derived biochar within next-generation biorefineries.
Keywords: 
;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  

1. Introduction

Lignin, the most abundant renewable aromatic polymer, remains significantly underutilized in modern biorefineries. Despite its high carbon content and structural richness, it is still predominantly valorized through low-value energy recovery processes, such as combustion in pulping and bioethanol industries [1,2]. This underutilization contrasts sharply with its potential as a sustainable precursor for high-value chemicals and functional carbon materials.
In recent years, increasing attention has been devoted to lignin valorization as a key strategy for improving the economic viability of lignocellulosic biorefineries. Within this context, the conversion of lignin into carbon-based materials has emerged as a particularly promising pathway. Among these materials, lignin-derived biochar (LDB) is particularly attractive due to its relatively simple production, high carbon yield, and tunable physicochemical properties. Through thermochemical processes such as pyrolysis or hydrothermal carbonization, lignin can be transformed into porous carbon materials with controlled surface area, pore structure, and surface functionality [3,4]. The overall lignin valorization pathway within biorefineries and its integration into material applications are schematically illustrated in Figure 1, while the structure-property-function relationships governing lignin-derived biochar are summarized in Figure 2.
The properties of lignin-derived biochar are strongly influenced by both the molecular structure of lignin and the conditions of thermochemical conversion. Compared with biochars derived from cellulose- or hemicellulose-rich feedstocks, lignin-based biochars typically exhibit higher aromaticity, greater structural stability, and enhanced adsorption capacity. These characteristics make LDB particularly attractive for applications in environmental remediation and advanced material systems.
In environmental applications, lignin-derived biochar has demonstrated considerable potential for the removal of emerging contaminants from water and soil systems, including pharmaceuticals, antibiotics, pesticides, and per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS). However, the reported performance is often highly dependent on activation conditions and remains difficult to compare across studies. This performance is governed by multiple interaction mechanisms, including π-π interactions, hydrogen bonding, electrostatic attraction, and pore-filling effects, which are closely linked to the aromatic carbon framework and surface functional groups of LDB [4,5].
In parallel, LDB has recently emerged as a promising platform for controlled release systems. Its porous structure enables the adsorption and gradual release of active compounds such as fertilizers, micronutrients, and pesticides, thereby contributing to improved resource-use efficiency and reduced environmental losses. Although controlled release systems based on lignin and biochar have been increasingly explored, the specific role of lignin-derived biochar in these systems remains insufficiently elucidated.
Despite these advances, several critical challenges remain. In particular, the intrinsic heterogeneity of lignin, the variability of technical lignin feedstocks, and the limited understanding of structure-property-function relationships hinder the rational design of lignin-derived biochar materials. Furthermore, most existing studies focus on biochar derived from whole lignocellulosic biomass, whereas comparatively limited attention has been given to materials produced exclusively from isolated lignin.
Within the broader context of lignocellulosic biorefineries, lignin-derived biochar offers a complementary valorization pathway compared to catalytic depolymerization or biochemical conversion routes. While these alternative strategies aim to produce defined chemical intermediates, biochar production provides a robust and scalable approach that tolerates lignin heterogeneity and requires less stringent purification. This positions LDB as a particularly attractive option for integrating lignin streams into value-added material applications, especially in facilities where process simplicity and carbon efficiency are prioritized.
In this context, the present review provides a comprehensive and critical overview of lignin-derived biochar within the framework of modern biorefineries. Particularly focused on (i) the structure and sources of lignin, (ii) thermochemical conversion pathways for LDB production, (iii) physicochemical properties and functionalization strategies, and (iv) emerging applications in environmental remediation and controlled release systems. Emphasis is placed on elucidating structure-property-function relationships and identifying future research directions for the development of lignin-based functional materials within sustainable and circular bioeconomy systems. As outlined in Figure 1, this review follows the conceptual pathway from lignin structure and conversion to functional material applications, providing a unified framework for understanding LDB within biorefineries.

2. Structure and Properties of Lignin

Lignin is a highly complex and heterogeneous biopolymer that constitutes one of the main structural components of lignocellulosic biomass, typically accounting for approximately 15-40% of its dry weight. It plays a fundamental role in plant cell walls by providing mechanical strength, hydrophobicity, and resistance to enzymatic and microbial degradation [6,7,8]. Due to its abundance and high carbon content, lignin represents the largest renewable source of aromatic structures in nature, making it an especially attractive feedstock for the development of carbon-based materials within modern biorefineries.
Chemically, lignin is formed through the radical polymerization of phenylpropanoid units derived from three primary monolignols: p-coumaryl alcohol, coniferyl alcohol, and sinapyl alcohol. These monolignols give rise to p-hydroxyphenyl (H), guaiacyl (G), and syringyl (S) structural units, respectively [6,8,9]. The resulting polymer exhibits a highly irregular three-dimensional network in which these units are interconnected through a variety of ether and carbon-carbon linkages, including β-O-4, β-β, β-5, and 5-5 bonds. Among these, β-O-4 linkages are typically the most abundant and play a key role in determining lignin reactivity during thermochemical conversion.
The relative abundance of H, G, and S units varies significantly depending on the biomass source. Softwoods are generally rich in guaiacyl units, hardwoods contain both guaiacyl and syringyl units, and grasses exhibit a more heterogeneous composition that includes all three types. These compositional differences directly influence lignin reactivity, thermal stability, and fragmentation pathways during conversion processes, which in turn affect the properties of lignin-derived materials.
In addition to its natural variability, lignin structure is further modified during industrial processing. Different extraction methods produce distinct types of technical lignin, including kraft lignin, lignosulfonates, organosolv lignin, and soda lignin. These lignins differ in molecular weight distribution, sulfur content, degree of condensation, and functional group composition, all of which significantly influence their behavior during thermochemical conversion and their suitability for specific valorization pathways [1,10].
From a materials science perspective, the structural complexity of lignin represents both a challenge and an opportunity. On the one hand, its heterogeneity and irregular architecture hinder the establishment of predictable and reproducible conversion pathways, thereby complicating process optimization. On the other hand, the presence of a wide variety of functional groups, including phenolic hydroxyl, aliphatic hydroxyl, methoxy, and carbonyl moieties, provides multiple reactive sites that can be exploited for chemical modification and interaction with target molecules.
These structural characteristics are particularly relevant to the production of lignin-derived biochar. During thermochemical conversion processes such as pyrolysis or hydrothermal carbonization, lignin undergoes dehydration, cleavage of ether linkages, and condensation of aromatic fragments, leading to the formation of carbon-rich materials with highly aromatic domains. The initial composition of lignin, including the S/G ratio and the distribution of interunit linkages, plays a key role in determining carbon yield, the degree of aromatic condensation, and pore development in the resulting biochar [3,11].
Biomass feedstocks with higher lignin content generally produce biochars with increased fixed carbon content, greater aromaticity, and enhanced structural stability compared with those derived from cellulose- or hemicellulose-rich materials. These properties are directly associated with improved adsorption capacity and long-term environmental stability [3,12,13]. In particular, the aromatic carbon framework inherited from lignin contributes to strong interactions with organic molecules, which is essential for applications in contaminant removal and controlled release systems.
However, despite these advantages, the relationship between lignin structure and the physicochemical properties of lignin-derived biochar is not yet fully understood. The intrinsic heterogeneity of lignin, combined with the variability introduced during extraction and processing, makes it difficult to establish clear structure-property-function relationships. This represents a major bottleneck for the rational design of lignin-derived biochar and highlights the need for more systematic studies linking lignin chemistry to material performance.
Notably, most studies do not isolate the effect of lignin structure from processing conditions, which complicates the interpretation of the reported trends. These structural features ultimately dictate thermochemical conversion pathways, as discussed in the following section.

3. Lignin Conversion and Biochar Production

The conversion of lignin into value-added materials represents a key strategy for improving the economic viability of lignocellulosic biorefineries. Among the available valorization pathways, thermochemical processes such as pyrolysis and hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) have attracted considerable attention because of their ability to transform lignin into carbon-rich materials with tunable physicochemical properties. In particular, the production of lignin-derived biochar provides a direct route for converting lignin into functional carbon materials for environmental and agricultural applications.
The properties of lignin-derived biochar, including surface chemistry, pore structure, and adsorption capacity, are strongly influenced by both the characteristics of the lignin feedstock and the operating conditions employed during thermochemical conversion [12,14,15]. As discussed in Section 2, the aromatic structure, degree of condensation, and functional group distribution of lignin play a decisive role in determining its thermal behavior and the structure of the resulting biochar. Consequently, understanding the interplay between lignin chemistry and processing conditions is essential for controlling biochar properties [3].

3.1. Pyrolysis of Lignin

Pyrolysis is the most widely applied method for producing lignin-derived biochar. This process involves the thermal decomposition of lignin in the absence of oxygen, typically at temperatures ranging from 400 to 800 °C. During pyrolysis, lignin undergoes a series of complex reactions, including depolymerization, devolatilization, and condensation, which lead to the formation of solid carbonaceous residues together with liquid and gaseous by-products[16].
At relatively low temperatures, lignin decomposition is incomplete, resulting in biochars with higher oxygen content and less developed aromatic structures. As the temperature increases, the progressive loss of volatile compounds and enhanced carbonization promote the formation of more condensed aromatic networks. This results in biochars with higher fixed carbon content, increased hydrophobicity, and improved thermal stability [3].
Pyrolysis temperature also plays a critical role in pore development. Higher temperatures generally favor the formation of microporous structures and increase surface area, which in turn favor adsorption applications. However, these conditions may simultaneously reduce the abundance of oxygen-containing functional groups, potentially limiting interactions with polar molecules and affecting performance in applications where surface functionality is critical. Moreover, the trade-off between increased porosity and the loss of surface functionality is not systematically addressed in the literature, making it difficult to establish optimal pyrolysis conditions for specific applications[17,18,19,20].
In addition to temperature, other parameters such as heating rate, residence time, and reactor configuration influence the structural evolution of lignin-derived biochar. Slower heating rates may promote more uniform carbonization, whereas longer residence times can enhance structural ordering and aromatic condensation [21,22] These parameters provide important tools for tailoring biochar properties to specific application requirements.

3.2. Hydrothermal Carbonization

Hydrothermal carbonization represents an alternative thermochemical route for converting lignin into biochar-like materials under milder conditions. This process is typically carried out in aqueous environments at temperatures between 180 and 250 °C under autogenous pressure. In contrast to pyrolysis, HTC involves a combination of hydrolysis, dehydration, and condensation reactions occurring in the liquid phase [23,24].
A key characteristic of HTC-derived materials is the retention of a higher fraction of oxygen-containing functional groups. Compared with pyrolyzed biochars, these materials generally exhibit higher surface polarity and different pore structures, which can enhance their interaction with polar compounds. This behavior can be advantageous for applications such as nutrient retention and controlled release systems [25,26].
However, HTC-derived biochars typically show lower aromaticity and reduced structural stability compared with those produced by high-temperature pyrolysis. As a result, their performance in adsorption applications may be limited, particularly for non-polar organic contaminants. Therefore, the choice between pyrolysis and hydrothermal carbonization should be guided by the specific requirements of the intended application. Overall, pyrolysis and hydrothermal carbonization offer complementary pathways for tailoring LDB properties: pyrolysis favors highly aromatic and stable carbon structures, whereas HTC preserves oxygen-containing functionalities and enhances surface polarity[24,25].

3.3. Process-Structure Relationships

From a materials design standpoint, the properties of lignin-derived biochar are governed by the combined effects of feedstock characteristics and thermochemical processing conditions. The selection of lignin type, together with the optimization of temperature, residence time, and reaction environment, determines key properties such as surface area, pore size distribution, degree of aromatic condensation, and surface functionality[27,28].
For instance, higher pyrolysis temperatures tend to increase aromaticity and microporosity, thereby enhancing adsorption capacity for hydrophobic contaminants. In contrast, milder conversion conditions may preserve functional groups that are beneficial for interactions with polar compounds [29]. These differences highlight the importance of tailoring conversion conditions to the requirements of specific applications.
In this context, the development of lignin-derived biochar can be viewed as a materials design problem in which controlling the conversion pathway allows the resulting structure and functionality to be tuned. However, establishing predictive relationships between lignin structure, processing conditions, and material properties remains a major challenge due to the intrinsic heterogeneity of lignin. Thus, lignin conversion should be understood not only as a transformation process but as a tunable design step for engineering application-specific biochar materials [30].
To summarize the relationships discussed above, the transformation of lignin into functional biochar materials can be understood as a sequential and interdependent process linking molecular structure, thermochemical conversion, and resulting physicochemical properties to final application performance.
As illustrated in Figure 2, lignin structure determines the pathways of thermochemical conversion, which in turn control the development of porosity, aromaticity, and surface functionality in lignin-derived biochar. These properties ultimately govern its performance in environmental remediation and controlled release systems.
Importantly, while thermochemical conversion defines the fundamental structure of lignin-derived biochar, additional modification strategies may be required to optimize performance for specific applications [4,31]. These post-conversion approaches, including activation and surface functionalization, are discussed in detail in the following section.

4. Functionalization of Lignin-Derived Biochar

The functionalization strategies discussed in this section can be interpreted within the structure-property-function framework illustrated in Figure 2. In this context, functionalization represents an additional level of control beyond primary thermochemical conversion, enabling the tuning of surface chemistry and porosity for specific applications. Beyond the intrinsic properties developed during thermochemical conversion, lignin-derived biochar can be deliberately modified through post-treatment strategies aimed at tailoring surface chemistry, pore accessibility, and reactivity for specific applications[32,33]. In this context, functionalization should be understood as a set of post-synthesis modification processes applied to the already formed carbon matrix, rather than as part of the primary biochar production stage[34]. These strategies are particularly relevant because the performance of pristine biochar, although often satisfactory, may still be limited by insufficient active-site density, restricted pore accessibility, or inadequate selectivity toward target molecules [4].
Functionalization is especially relevant in lignin-derived systems because the aromatic framework and residual oxygen-containing groups inherited from lignin provide a favorable platform for further chemical modification. Lignin-derived biochars already exhibit high carbon stability, pronounced aromatic character, and significant adsorption potential compared with biochars obtained from other lignocellulosic fractions, making them suitable candidates for engineered post-treatments [2,35].

4.1. Chemical Activation

Chemical activation is one of the most widely used post-treatment strategies for increasing surface area and developing microporosity. Activating agents such as potassium hydroxide (KOH), phosphoric acid (H3PO4), and zinc chloride (ZnCl2) promote pore development and generate highly porous carbon materials with enhanced adsorption capacity [4,36]. In lignin-derived biochars, this approach is particularly effective because the condensed aromatic skeleton formed during conversion can be selectively etched and reorganized without fully compromising structural integrity [37,38].
From an application perspective, chemical activation is especially useful when high surface area and abundant microporosity are required, as in the adsorption of organic pollutants or the immobilization of bioactive compounds. However, increased porosity must be balanced against possible losses in surface functionality and the risk of structural collapse under harsh treatment conditions. Thus, activation should be regarded not simply as a route to maximize surface area, but as a design tool for tuning the balance between accessibility, retention strength, and reactivity [28,39].

4.2. Heteroatom Doping

Heteroatom doping represents another important modification route in which elements such as nitrogen, sulfur, or phosphorus are incorporated into the carbon framework. These heteroatoms can introduce additional active sites and modify the electronic properties of the carbon matrix, thereby improving adsorption performance and catalytic activity [40].
In lignin-derived biochar, heteroatom doping is particularly attractive because the pre-existing aromatic structure can stabilize the doped functionalities and facilitate their integration into the carbon matrix [41]. This type of modification may alter surface polarity, acid-base behavior, and charge distribution, thereby influencing interactions with ionic contaminants, aromatic molecules, and nutrient species[42,43]. Therefore, heteroatom doping provides a route beyond non-specific adsorption and toward more selective, application-oriented material design.

4.3. Metal Impregnation and Hybrid Functionalization

Metal impregnation is widely used to produce functional biochar composites. In this approach, metal nanoparticles or metal oxides, such as those based on iron, manganese, or magnesium, are introduced onto or into the biochar matrix, generating hybrid materials with enhanced adsorption capacity and catalytic properties [44]. These systems are particularly attractive because they can combine pollutant adsorption with catalytic degradation, thereby expanding the functional scope of lignin-derived biochar beyond passive sorption.
For lignin-derived biochar, this strategy is especially relevant because the oxygen-containing surface groups can serve as anchoring sites for metal species. In addition, the porous aromatic matrix provides stable support that can promote dispersion of the active phases and reduce aggregation. This hybridization approach is also promising for multifunctional agricultural systems in which adsorption, micronutrient retention, and controlled release may need to be integrated within a single material platform[45,46].

4.4. Surface Oxidation and Polarity Control

In addition to activation and impregnation, surface oxidation treatments can be applied to introduce additional oxygen-containing functional groups onto the biochar surface. Oxidation using agents such as nitric acid or hydrogen peroxide can improve hydrophilicity and surface reactivity, thereby enhancing interactions with polar contaminants and nutrient species [4,47].
This type of modification is particularly relevant when the target application depends not only on sorption capacity but also on controlled interaction strength. For example, in controlled release systems, excessively hydrophobic surfaces may retain active compounds too strongly, whereas oxidized surfaces may facilitate a more balanced adsorption-desorption behavior[48]. Consequently, surface oxidation provides a practical route for tuning polarity and interfacial behavior without fundamentally altering the carbon backbone of LDB[49].

4.5. Functionalization-Performance Relationships

Overall, the functionalization strategies discussed above provide effective tools for tailoring the properties of lignin-derived biochar and expanding its range of applications. In this context, functionalization should not be viewed as a simple enhancement step, but rather as a strategic design tool to tailor LDB performance toward specific applications.
By controlling surface chemistry, porosity, and structural accessibility, engineered LDB materials can be designed for specific uses such as emerging contaminant removal, catalysis, and controlled release systems [4,50].
However, a critical perspective is required, as enhanced functionality does not automatically translate into improved application performance. Excessive oxidation may reduce aromatic interactions, aggressive activation may compromise structural stability, and metal impregnation may raise concerns related to leaching or long-term environmental behavior [48]. Therefore, the rational design of functionalized LDB should focus not only on maximizing individual properties but also on achieving an appropriate balance between structure, reactivity, and application-specific performance[51].
Table 1 summarizes recent studies on lignin-derived biochar, highlighting the relationship between synthesis conditions, physicochemical properties, and environmental applications. These results demonstrate that activation methods and pyrolysis temperature play a key role in controlling surface area and pore structure, which directly influence the adsorption capacity of the resulting materials. Despite the wide variation in reported surface areas and adsorption capacities, direct comparison between studies remains challenging due to differences in lignin type, activation method, and experimental conditions. This highlights the need for standardized evaluation protocols.

5. Applications of Lignin-Derived Biochar

Building upon the structure-property relationships established in previous sections, lignin-derived biochar can be applied in two main domains: (i) adsorption of emerging contaminants and (ii) controlled release systems. These correspond to two complementary operational regimes, in which the same physicochemical properties govern either retention-dominated or release-controlled behavior. These domains are directly linked to the structure-property-function relationships illustrated in Figure 2, which provide a unifying framework for interpreting both adsorption and controlled release behaviors. In particular, the high aromaticity inherited from lignin, combined with tunable porosity and diverse surface functional groups, enables the development of carbon materials with strong and versatile interactions with a wide range of organic molecules and ionic species[32,61]. This dual functionality underscores the need to interpret lignin-derived biochar systems not as static adsorbents, but as dynamic platforms in which adsorption and release represent two interconnected and tunable processes.
From a biorefinery perspective, these applications represent a direct valorization pathway for technical lignins, transforming a traditionally underutilized by-product into high-value functional materials. The ability to tailor LDB properties through controlled thermochemical conversion and post-functionalization further reinforces its role as a platform material within integrated lignocellulosic biorefineries. Importantly, both applications are governed by the same structure-property-function relationships, although they differ in their operational objectives, namely maximizing retention in adsorption systems and enabling regulated release in delivery applications.

5.1. Adsorption of Emerging Contaminants

Emerging contaminants, including pharmaceuticals, personal care products, endocrine-disrupting compounds, microplastics, and per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), are increasingly detected in aquatic environments due to their widespread use and incomplete removal in conventional treatment systems [62]. In this context, lignin-derived biochar has attracted increasing attention as a sustainable adsorbent because of its renewable origin and tunable physicochemical properties[32,33].
Adsorption performance is governed by the interplay between the aromatic carbon framework, pore structure, and surface chemistry of LDB. The main adsorption mechanisms involved in the interaction between lignin-derived biochar and emerging contaminants are summarized in Figure 3. These include π-π stacking interactions associated with the aromatic domains inherited from lignin, hydrogen bonding mediated by oxygen-containing functional groups, electrostatic attraction between charged species and surface sites, pore-filling effects within the porous structure, and hydrophobic interactions at the biochar-water interface. The relative contribution of each mechanism depends on both the physicochemical properties of the contaminant and the structural characteristics of LDB. These mechanisms (Figure 3) underpin the adsorption behavior observed across the different contaminant classes discussed below.

5.1.1. Pharmaceuticals and Antibiotics

Pharmaceutical compounds represent one of the most prevalent classes of emerging contaminants due to their continuous release into aquatic environments and resistance to degradation [63]. Lignin-derived carbon materials have demonstrated strong adsorption capacity for a wide range of pharmaceutical molecules.
Popovic et al. [64] reported efficient diclofenac removal using amino-functionalized lignin microspheres, in which adsorption was primarily governed by electrostatic interactions and hydrogen bonding. Similarly, lignin-derived hierarchical porous carbons exhibit high affinity for carbamazepine because of their developed surface area and interconnected pore structures, which facilitate diffusion and adsorption within the carbon matrix [56].
Antibiotic removal has also been extensively studied. Xiang et al. [65] reported tetracycline adsorption capacities of approximately 31 mg g-1 using lignin-modified biochar, whereas significantly higher capacities (>400 mg g-1) were achieved with KOH-activated systems due to enhanced microporosity and surface functionality [66]. These results highlight the critical role of activation processes in tailoring lignin-derived structures for improved adsorption performance.

5.1.2. Personal Care Products and Endocrine-Disrupting Compounds

Personal care products (PCPs) and endocrine-disrupting compounds (EDCs) are typically aromatic molecules, making them particularly susceptible to adsorption onto lignin-derived carbon materials. The aromatic structure inherited from lignin plays a decisive role in promoting π-π stacking and hydrophobic interactions.
For instance, Tong et al. [67] and Cho et al. [68] demonstrated that triclosan adsorption is strongly influenced by pyrolysis temperature, surface area, and functional group distribution, with reported capacities of up to ~49 mg g-1. Similarly, lignin-derived activated carbons exhibit high adsorption capacity for bisphenol A (BPA), reaching approximately 220-260 mg g-1 [33,69], with performance closely linked to microporosity and surface chemistry.
These findings suggest that the adsorption of aromatic contaminants is fundamentally controlled by the graphitic domains formed during lignin carbonization, highlighting the importance of lignin-derived structural features.

5.1.3. Microplastics and Nanoplastics

The removal of microplastics and nanoplastics represents an emerging application area for LDB materials. Their hydrophobic nature and persistence in aquatic systems make them difficult to remove using conventional technologies.
Recent studies have shown that lignin-derived activated carbons with high surface area (~1300 m2 g-1) can effectively adsorb polystyrene nanoplastics, primarily through hydrophobic interactions and physical trapping within micropores [58]. In this context, pore structure and surface roughness are key parameters governing adsorption performance.
Despite promising results, this research area remains relatively underdeveloped, particularly for biochars derived exclusively from isolated lignin, highlighting a relevant gap in the current literature.

5.1.4. PFAS

PFAS represent one of the most challenging classes of emerging contaminants due to their high chemical stability and persistence. Compared with other contaminant classes, studies focusing on lignin-derived biochar for PFAS removal remain limited.
Mel et al. [70] demonstrated that kraft lignin can adsorb PFAS compounds, with sorption behavior strongly influenced by chain length and functional group chemistry. Roman et al. [71] further showed that carbonization of lignin significantly enhances PFAS adsorption capacity by increasing surface area and pore accessibility. Moreover, lignin-derived activated carbons have been reported to achieve removal efficiencies exceeding 99% for compounds such as PFOA and PFOS under optimized conditions [72].
However, despite these advances, LDB-based systems still require optimization to match the performance of commercial activated carbons, particularly in terms of microporosity and surface chemistry.
Overall, adsorption in lignin-derived biochar systems is governed by a combination of aromaticity, surface functionality, and pore architecture. These properties, inherited from lignin structure and modulated through thermochemical conversion, determine the relative contribution of different interaction mechanisms, including π-π stacking, hydrogen bonding, electrostatic attraction, pore filling, and hydrophobic interactions (Figure 3). Together, these mechanisms explain the high affinity of LDB for a wide range of emerging contaminants and highlight its versatility as a sustainable adsorbent.
However, adsorption performance is often reported under idealized laboratory conditions, and real-world applicability, particularly in complex environmental matrices, remains insufficiently validated. Most studies rely on simplified systems, such as single-solute solutions under controlled pH and short-term batch conditions, which may significantly overestimate performance compared to real environments. Furthermore, the lack of standardized testing protocols, including differences in initial concentrations, contact times, and normalization approaches, hinders direct comparison across studies. Addressing these limitations is essential to advance lignin-derived biochar from laboratory-scale demonstrations to practical environmental applications.
From a valorization perspective, the use of LDB as an adsorbent represents a high-value application for lignin streams within biorefineries, contributing to environmental remediation while improving carbon utilization efficiency. Importantly, adsorption and controlled release are not independent phenomena but complementary manifestations of the same structure-property-function relationships. This conceptual continuity provides the basis for the controlled release systems discussed in the following section. Importantly, the mechanisms described for adsorption (Figure 3) form the basis for controlled release behavior, as the same interactions governing retention must be finely tuned to enable regulated desorption in controlled release systems (Figure 4).

5.2. Controlled Release Systems Based on Lignin-Derived Biochar

The adsorption properties of lignin-derived biochar discussed in the previous section highlight the strong affinity of these carbonaceous materials for a wide range of organic molecules and ionic species [50,73]. The same physicochemical characteristics that make lignin-derived biochar effective for contaminant removal, such as high surface area, developed pore structure, aromatic carbon domains, and abundant surface functional groups, also make these materials highly suitable as carriers for controlled release systems [3,4].
It should be noted that, while this section focuses on lignin-derived biochar, the current literature is still dominated by lignin-based systems, particularly in pesticide delivery applications[74,75,76]. In this context, the term lignin-derived carbon materials is used to encompass both biochar and closely related carbonaceous structures obtained from lignin.
In adsorption applications, biochar acts as a sorbent that immobilizes contaminants from aqueous environments. In contrast, in controlled release systems, the same adsorption capacity is exploited to temporarily retain nutrients, pesticides, or other bioactive compounds within the porous structure of the material and subsequently release them in a gradual and regulated manner. This dual functionality further highlights the conceptual link between adsorption and controlled release in LDB systems [4,50].
Consequently, increasing research efforts have been devoted to the development of controlled release systems based on lignin-derived biochar, particularly in the context of sustainable agriculture and nutrient management [3]. These systems aim to improve agrochemical efficiency while minimizing environmental losses such as leaching, volatilization, and degradation [77].
To provide a structured overview, Table 2 compiles representative and experimentally studies on lignin-derived carbon materials and lignin-based systems used in controlled release applications, including precursor type, synthesis and modification strategies, physicochemical properties, dominant release mechanisms, and performance metrics.
The collected studies illustrate how controlled release behavior emerges from the interplay between surface chemistry, porosity, and matrix design, which together regulate adsorption strength and diffusion pathways, as conceptually represented in Figure 4, where the main release mechanisms are illustrated.
Importantly, Table 1 and Table 2 should be interpreted as complementary datasets representing two operational regimes of lignin-derived biochar (LDB) systems: retention-dominated behavior in contaminant adsorption (Table 1) and balanced retention-release behavior in controlled release systems (Table 2). While adsorption applications prioritize strong and often irreversible interactions, controlled release systems require a fine-tuned balance between affinity and mobility to ensure sustained and effective delivery of active compounds [4,73].
Notably, the studies compiled in Table 2 also reveal that, whereas lignin-derived porous carbons are more frequently applied in nutrient controlled release systems, pesticide-related applications are still largely dominated by lignin-based carriers and composite formulations rather than standalone biochar matrices [81,82,84]. This distinction underscores current research trends and highlights opportunities for further development of LDB-specific platforms in controlled release technologies.

5.2.1. Controlled Release Fertilizers

Lignin-derived biochar has been increasingly explored as a carrier material for controlled release fertilizers due to its porous structure, high surface area, and tunable surface chemistry [3,4]. These properties enable the adsorption and retention of nutrients within the biochar matrix, followed by their gradual release into the soil solution.
In nitrogen-based systems, lignin-derived carbon materials and lignin-biochar composites have demonstrated the ability to reduce nutrient losses through leaching while extending nutrient availability over time [78,79]. The incorporation of porous carbon structures enhances nutrient retention via physical adsorption and pore confinement, whereas surface functional groups contribute to interactions with ionic species such as ammonium and nitrate [73].
Similarly, lignin-based coatings and composites have been applied to urea fertilizers to regulate nutrient release kinetics. In these systems, diffusion barriers created by lignin-derived matrices or hybrid materials control water penetration and nutrient dissolution, resulting in prolonged release profiles and improved nutrient use efficiency [80]. These diffusion- and barrier-governed processes are among the mechanisms summarized in Figure 4.
Overall, the performance of lignin-derived systems in fertilizer delivery is governed by the balance between adsorption capacity and diffusion limitations, which can be tuned through pyrolysis conditions, activation strategies, and composite design [3].

5.2.2. Controlled Release of Pesticides

In addition to fertilizers, lignin-derived materials have also been investigated as carriers for the controlled release of pesticides [75]. Conventional pesticide formulations often suffer from rapid degradation, volatilization, or leaching after application, which reduces their effectiveness and increases the risk of environmental contamination [77].
Herbicides
Herbicides are widely used to control weed growth in agricultural systems, but their excessive application can lead to soil and water contamination. Lignin-derived materials have been explored as delivery platforms to regulate herbicide release and reduce environmental losses[74,76].
The interaction between herbicides and lignin-derived matrices is typically governed by π-π interactions, hydrogen bonding, and hydrophobic partitioning, depending on the chemical structure of the active compound and the surface properties of the carrier [50,73]. These interactions enable the temporary retention of herbicides within the material, followed by a controlled release driven by diffusion and desorption processes, as illustrated in Figure 4.
Insecticides and Other Pesticides
Controlled release systems based on lignin-derived materials have also been developed for insecticides and other bioactive compounds. In many cases, lignin-based carriers, microcapsules, and hybrid systems are employed to enhance stability and regulate release kinetics [81,82,84].
Encapsulation strategies provide additional protection against photodegradation and environmental degradation, while diffusion-controlled mechanisms ensure sustained release over time. These systems often combine adsorption within the lignin matrix with barrier-controlled release, resulting in improved persistence and reduced losses [83]. These observations are consistent with the broader trends summarized in Table 2, where pesticide controlled release systems are predominantly based on lignin-derived carriers and composite formulations rather than standalone biochar matrices.
Despite these promising developments, studies specifically focusing on lignin-derived biochar as standalone carriers for pesticide delivery remain scarce, highlighting a critical gap in the current literature.

6. Challenges and Future Perspectives

Despite the significant progress achieved in the valorization of lignin into functional carbon materials, the development of lignin-derived biochar for environmental remediation and controlled release systems remains at a relatively early stage within the broader context of biorefinery integration. While numerous studies have demonstrated the potential of LDB as a multifunctional material, several interconnected challenges must be addressed to enable its transition from laboratory-scale research to scalable and application-oriented technologies.

6.1. Lignin Heterogeneity and Feedstock Variability

One of the most critical limitations in the development of LDB materials lies in the intrinsic structural heterogeneity of lignin. Unlike synthetic polymers, lignin exhibits a highly irregular and source-dependent architecture composed of varying proportions of H, G, and S units, as well as diverse interunit linkages and functional groups.
This variability is further amplified by industrial extraction processes, leading to different types of technical lignin (e.g., kraft, organosolv, and lignosulfonates), each with distinct physicochemical characteristics. As a result, the lignin feedstock strongly influences thermochemical conversion pathways, carbon yield, pore development, and surface functionality in the resulting biochar [1,13].
Consequently, establishing robust and predictive structure-property-function relationships remains a major challenge. Current studies often rely on empirical optimization, with limited ability to correlate lignin molecular structure with final material performance. Addressing this limitation is essential for the rational design of lignin-derived biochar tailored to specific applications.

6.2. Limited Understanding of Molecular-Level Mechanisms

Closely related to feedstock variability is the limited understanding of the molecular mechanisms governing lignin transformation during thermochemical conversion and its impact on LDB functionality. Although these mechanisms are commonly reported (Figure 3), their relative contributions and synergistic effects remain poorly understood, particularly for biochars derived exclusively from lignin, thereby limiting the development of predictive structure-property-function relationships.
Although it is well established that lignin aromaticity contributes to the formation of condensed carbon structures, the role of specific functional groups, monolignol composition, and linkage distribution in determining porosity, surface chemistry, and reactivity is not yet fully understood. This knowledge gap restricts the ability to design LDB materials with targeted adsorption or controlled-release properties.
Advanced analytical techniques such as solid-state NMR, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), and high-resolution electron microscopy, combined with computational modeling approaches, are expected to play a central role in elucidating these relationships. Bridging this gap will enable a shift from empirical material development toward predictive and design-oriented strategies.

6.3. Process Optimization and Scalability

From a technological perspective, the scalability of lignin-to-biochar conversion remains a critical challenge. Thermochemical processes such as pyrolysis and hydrothermal carbonization offer flexibility in tailoring LDB properties; however, their performance is highly sensitive to process parameters, including temperature, residence time, heating rate, and activation conditions [3].
While laboratory studies have demonstrated the feasibility of tuning porosity and surface chemistry, scaling these processes to industrial levels involves significant challenges related to energy consumption, process control, and reproducibility. In addition, the integration of activation and functionalization may further increase process complexity and cost [85].
Within the context of lignocellulosic biorefineries, the efficient integration of LDB production with upstream lignin fractionation and downstream applications is essential. Developing continuous, energy-efficient, and economically viable processes will be a key factor in determining the industrial feasibility of lignin-derived biochar technologies.

6.4. Balancing Adsorption Strength and Release Performance

In both environmental remediation and controlled-release applications, LDB performance is governed by a delicate balance between adsorption strength and desorption behavior. While high aromaticity and developed microporosity enhance the adsorption of contaminants and agrochemicals, excessively strong interactions may hinder desorption and reduce bioavailability.
This trade-off is particularly critical in controlled-release systems, where overly strong retention of nutrients or pesticides can limit their availability to plants or target organisms [86]. Conversely, insufficient interaction strength may lead to rapid release and reduced efficiency. As illustrated in Figure 4, controlled-release behavior is governed by multiple concurrent mechanisms, including diffusion, matrix degradation, and environmental responsiveness, which must be carefully balanced to achieve optimal performance.
Achieving optimal performance therefore requires precise control of surface chemistry, pore structure, and functional group distribution. This highlights the importance of rational material design strategies that consider both adsorption capacity and release kinetics as interdependent parameters.

6.5. Need for Lignin-Specific Studies

A significant limitation in the current literature is the predominance of studies based on biochars derived from whole lignocellulosic biomass rather than from isolated lignin. While these materials provide valuable insights, they do not fully capture the unique structural features and reactivity of lignin-derived systems.
Given that lignin plays a dominant role in determining aromaticity, pore development, and surface functionality, LDB materials are expected to exhibit distinct behavior compared with conventional biochars. However, systematic studies focusing exclusively on lignin-derived biochar remain limited.
This represents a critical research gap, particularly in applications such as pesticide delivery and PFAS adsorption, where lignin-specific interactions may offer unique advantages. Future research should therefore prioritize comparative studies that isolate the role of lignin in determining material performance.

6.6. Functionalization and Hybrid Material Design

Functionalization and hybridization strategies offer promising routes for overcoming current limitations in LDB performance. As discussed in Section 4, approaches such as heteroatom doping, metal impregnation, and polymer coating can significantly modify surface chemistry, porosity, and reactivity.
These modifications enable the development of multifunctional materials capable of combining adsorption, catalysis, and controlled release within a single platform. For example, metal-modified LDB can enhance contaminant removal through catalytic degradation, whereas polymer-biochar composites can improve control over release kinetics in agricultural systems.
However, these strategies also introduce new challenges, including increased synthesis complexity, potential environmental risks associated with metal leaching, and higher production costs. Therefore, the design of functionalized LDB materials should focus on achieving an optimal balance between performance, stability, and sustainability.

6.7. Environmental and Economic Assessment

For LDB technologies to be successfully implemented at scale, their environmental and economic performance must be rigorously evaluated. Life cycle assessment (LCA) and techno-economic analysis (TEA) are essential tools for assessing the sustainability of lignin-derived biochar production and application [85].
These evaluations should consider not only energy inputs and production costs but also long-term environmental impacts, including soil persistence, carbon sequestration potential, ecotoxicity, and the fate of adsorbed contaminants or released agrochemicals.
In addition, the development of standardized protocols for evaluating adsorption performance, release kinetics, and environmental safety is necessary to ensure comparability among studies and to facilitate regulatory acceptance.

6.8. Future Research Directions

Looking forward, the development of lignin-derived biochar as a key material within sustainable biorefineries will depend on several priority research areas, including the establishment of predictive structure-property-function relationships linking lignin chemistry to biochar performance, the development of scalable and energy-efficient thermochemical conversion processes, the design of lignin-specific materials for targeted applications such as PFAS removal and pesticide delivery, the advancement of multifunctional and hybrid systems that integrate adsorption and controlled release, and the validation of performance under realistic environmental and field conditions. From a broader perspective, LDB represents a strategic bridge between lignin chemistry and functional material design. Its ability to transform low-value lignin streams into high-performance materials aligns strongly with the principles of the circular bioeconomy and sustainable resource utilization [30].

7. Conclusions and Integration in the Circular Bioeconomy

Lignin, as the most abundant renewable aromatic polymer in nature, represents a key yet historically underutilized component of lignocellulosic biomass within modern biorefineries. Traditionally valorized through low-value energy recovery, lignin is increasingly recognized as a strategic feedstock for producing advanced carbon materials. Among these, lignin-derived biochar (LDB) has emerged as a versatile platform due to its high carbon content, tunable physicochemical properties, and intrinsic aromatic structure.
As summarized in Figure 2, the performance of LDB is governed by interconnected structure-property-function relationships, where lignin molecular structure, thermochemical conversion pathways, and the resulting material properties collectively determine its behavior in environmental and agricultural applications.
This review has highlighted that the transformation of lignin into biochar through thermochemical processes such as pyrolysis and hydrothermal carbonization enables the generation of functional carbon materials with controllable porosity, surface chemistry, and structural stability. Importantly, these properties are not arbitrary but are directly governed by the molecular structure of lignin and the conditions of its conversion, reinforcing the importance of establishing clear structure-property-function relationships for rational material design.
In environmental applications, LDB shows strong potential as a sustainable adsorbent for the removal of emerging contaminants, including pharmaceuticals, antibiotics, endocrine-disrupting compounds, microplastics, and PFAS. The effectiveness of these materials arises from the combined contribution of aromatic carbon domains, developed pore structures, and surface functional groups, which enable multiple interaction mechanisms such as π-π stacking, hydrogen bonding, electrostatic attraction, and pore-filling processes. These findings confirm that lignin-derived carbon materials can serve as efficient and renewable alternatives to conventional adsorbents in water treatment systems.
In parallel, LDB has shown considerable promise as a carrier in controlled release systems for agricultural applications. Its porous structure and surface chemistry allow the adsorption and gradual release of nutrients, pesticides, and micronutrients, contributing to improved agrochemical use efficiency and reduced environmental losses. Lignin-derived biochar offers advantages in terms of chemical stability, long-term persistence in soil, and tunability of release kinetics through material design and functionalization strategies. While adsorption processes (Figure 3) rely on maximizing interaction strength, controlled release systems (Figure 4) require a balance between retention and desorption.
From a biorefinery perspective, these applications represent a direct and high-value valorization pathway for lignin streams. By converting technical lignins into functional materials with environmental and agricultural relevance, LDB contributes to improved carbon utilization, reduced waste generation, and the development of integrated and circular processing schemes. Moreover, the multifunctionality of LDB, combining adsorption, controlled release, and potential catalytic activity, positions it as a key material for addressing interconnected challenges in water treatment and sustainable agriculture.
However, despite these advances, several challenges must be addressed to fully realize the potential of lignin-derived biochar. These include the intrinsic heterogeneity of lignin, the limited understanding of molecular-level transformation mechanisms, and the need for scalable and economically viable production processes. In addition, further research is required to optimize the balance between adsorption strength and release efficiency, particularly in controlled release applications, and to validate material performance under realistic environmental conditions.
A critical research gap lies in the limited number of studies focusing specifically on biochars derived exclusively from isolated lignin. Most existing work is based on lignocellulosic biomass, which obscures the unique contributions of lignin to material properties and performance. Addressing this gap will be essential for advancing lignin-specific design strategies and fully exploiting the potential of lignin-derived systems.
Looking forward, the development of LDB within biorefinery frameworks will require a shift toward more integrated and design-oriented approaches. This includes the establishment of predictive relationships linking lignin structure to material performance, the optimization of thermochemical conversion and functionalization processes, and the development of hybrid materials tailored for specific applications. In parallel, comprehensive life cycle and techno-economic assessments will be necessary to ensure the sustainability and feasibility of these technologies on a scale.
In conclusion, lignin-derived biochar represents a strategic bridge between lignin chemistry and functional material design. By enabling the transformation of an abundant and underutilized biopolymer into high-performance carbon materials, LDB aligns closely with the principles of circular bioeconomy.
Future advances will depend on the development of predictive structure-property-function relationships, scalable conversion processes, and application-driven material design strategies. With these advances, LDB has the potential to become a cornerstone technology in next generation biorefineries supporting more sustainable, efficient, and integrated biomass utilization, and positioning lignin-derived biochar as a key material in next-generation biorefineries.

Author Contributions

Francisco Flores Céspedes: Conceptualization, Literature search, Data curation, Formal analysis, Writing – Original Draft. Luis García Fuentes: Data curation, Visualization, Formal analysis, Writing – Review & Editing.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Schutyser, W.; Renders, T.; Van Den Bosch, S.; Koelewijn, S.F.; Beckham, G.T.; Sels, B.F. Chemicals from Lignin: An Interplay of Lignocellulose Fractionation, Depolymerisation, and Upgrading. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2018, 47, 852–908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Wang, H.; Pu, Y.; Ragauskas, A.; Yang, B. From Lignin to Valuable Products–Strategies, Challenges, and Prospects. Bioresour. Technol. 2019, 271, 449–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Leng, L.; Huang, H.; Li, H.; Li, J.; Zhou, W. Biochar Stability Assessment Methods: A Review. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 647, 210–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Tan, X.; Liu, Y.; Zeng, G.; Wang, X.; Hu, X.; Gu, Y.; Yang, Z. Application of Biochar for the Removal of Pollutants from Aqueous Solutions. Chemosphere 2015, 125, 70–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Ahmed, M.B.; Zhou, J.L.; Ngo, H.H.; Guo, W.; Chen, M. Progress in the Preparation and Application of Modified Biochar for Improved Contaminant Removal from Water and Wastewater. Bioresour. Technol. 2016, 214, 836–851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Zhao, X.; Zhang, L.; Liu, D. Biomass Recalcitrance. Part I: The Chemical Compositions and Physical Structures Affecting the Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Lignocellulose. Biofuels Bioprod. Biorefining 2012, 6, 465–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Boerjan, W.; Ralph, J.; Baucher, M. Lignin Biosynthesis. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2003, 54, 519–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ralph, J.; Lapierre, C.; Boerjan, W. Lignin Structure and Its Engineering. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2019, 56, 240–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Vanholme, R.; Demedts, B.; Morreel, K.; Ralph, J.; Boerjan, W. Lignin Biosynthesis and Structure. Plant Physiol. 2010, 153, 895–905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Shorey, R.; Salaghi, A.; Fatehi, P.; Mekonnen, T.H. Valorization of Lignin for Advanced Material Applications: A Review. RSC Sustain. 2024, 2, 804–831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Beckham, G.T.; Johnson, C.W.; Karp, E.M.; Salvachúa, D.; Vardon, D.R. Opportunities and Challenges in Biological Lignin Valorization. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2016, 42, 40–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Dixon, R.A.; Puente-Urbina, A.; Beckham, G.T.; Román-Leshkov, Y. Enabling Lignin Valorization Through Integrated Advances in Plant Biology and Biorefining. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2026, 47, 53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Wang, C.; Luo, D.; Zhang, X.; Huang, R.; Cao, Y.; Liu, G.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, H. Biochar-Based Slow-Release of Fertilizers for Sustainable Agriculture: A Mini Review. Environ. Sci. Ecotechnology 2022, 10, 100167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Jindal, M.; Uniyal, P.; Thallada, B. Reductive Catalytic Fractionation as a Novel Pretreatment/Lignin-First Approach for Lignocellulosic Biomass Valorization: A Review. Bioresour. Technol. 2023, 385, 129396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Li, X.; Xu, Y.; Alorku, K.; Wang, J.; Ma, L. A Review of Lignin-First Reductive Catalytic Fractionation of Lignocellulose. Mol. Catal. 2023, 550, 113551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Brebu, M.; Vasile, C. Thermal Degradation of Lignin-A Review. Cellul. Chem. Technol. 2010, 44, 353–363. [Google Scholar]
  17. Grottola, C.M.; Giudicianni, P.; Stanzione, F.; Ragucci, R. Influence of Pyrolysis Temperature on Biochar Produced from Lignin–Rich Biorefinery Residue. ChemEngineering 2022, 6, 76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Handiso, B.; Pääkkönen, T.; Wilson, B.P. Effect of Pyrolysis Temperature on the Physical and Chemical Characteristics of Pine Wood Biochar. Waste Manag. Bull. 2024, 2, 281–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Song, Y.; Tan, J.; Jin, M.; Liu, Z.; Zhu, J.; El-sayed, M.E.A.; Abdelhafeez, I.A.; Zhang, Y.; Shen, Z. Effect of Pyrolysis Temperature and Heating Rate on the Physicochemical Properties of Alkali Lignin-Derived Biochar: A Comparative Study of Fast and Slow Pyrolysis. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 2025, 191, 107236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Chen, W.; Shi, S.; Nguyen, T.; Chen, M.; Zhou, X. Effect of Temperature on the Evolution of Physical Structure and Chemical Properties of Bio-char Derived from Co-pyrolysis of Lignin with High-Density Polyethylene. BioResources 2016, 11, 3923–3936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Galano, A.; Aburto, J.; Sadhukhan, J.; Torres-García, E. A Combined Theoretical-Experimental Investigation on the Mechanism of Lignin Pyrolysis: Role of Heating Rates and Residence Times. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 2017, 128, 208–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Li, C.; Hayashi, J. ichiro; Sun, Y.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, S.; Wang, S.; Hu, X. Impact of Heating Rates on the Evolution of Function Groups of the Biochar from Lignin Pyrolysis. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 2021, 155, 105031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Funke, A.; Ziegler, F. Hydrothermal Carbonization of Biomass: A Summary and Discussion of Chemical Mechanisms for Process Engineering. Biofuels Bioprod. Biorefining 2010, 4, 160–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Libra, J.A.; Ro, K.S.; Kammann, C.; Funke, A.; Berge, N.D.; Neubauer, Y.; Titirici, M.-M.; Fühner, C.; Bens, O.; Kern, J.; et al. Hydrothermal Carbonization of Biomass Residuals: A Comparative Review of the Chemistry, Processes and Applications of Wet and Dry Pyrolysis. Biofuels 2011, 2, 71–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Titirici, M.M.; White, R.J.; Falco, C.; Sevilla, M. Black Perspectives for a Green Future: Hydrothermal Carbons for Environment Protection and Energy Storage. Energy Environ. Sci. 2012, 5, 6796–6822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Sevilla, M.; Fuertes, A.B. The Production of Carbon Materials by Hydrothermal Carbonization of Cellulose. Carbon N. Y. 2009, 47, 2281–2289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Tripathi, M.; Sahu, J.N.; Ganesan, P. Effect of Process Parameters on Production of Biochar from Biomass Waste through Pyrolysis: A Review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2016, 55, 467–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Wang, J.; Wang, S. Preparation, Modification and Environmental Application of Biochar: A Review. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 227, 1002–1022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ahmad, M.; Rajapaksha, A.U.; Lim, J.E.; Zhang, M.; Bolan, N.; Mohan, D.; Vithanage, M.; Lee, S.S.; Ok, Y.S. Biochar as a Sorbent for Contaminant Management in Soil and Water: A Review. Chemosphere 2014, 99, 19–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ragauskas, A.J.; Beckham, G.T.; Biddy, M.J.; Chandra, R.; Chen, F.; Davis, M.F.; Davison, B.H.; Dixon, R.A.; Gilna, P.; Keller, M.; et al. Lignin Valorization: Improving Lignin Processing in the Biorefinery. Science 2014, 344, 1246843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Chia, C.H.; Downie, A.; Munroe, P. Characteristics of Biochar: Physical and Structural Properties. In Biochar for Environmental Management, 2nd Edition ed; Taylor and Francis, UK: Publisher, 2015; pp. 89–109. [Google Scholar]
  32. Dadhich, A.; Dhar, I.; Choudhary, R.; Sharma, Y.; Sharma, M.M.; Jain, R. Lignin-Driven Valorization of Lignocellulosic Biomass to Functional Biochar for Advanced Wastewater Remediation: A Review. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2025, 331, 148331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Flores-Céspedes, F.; González-Fernández, I.; Fernández-Pérez, M.; García-Fuentes, L. Enhanced Adsorption of Bisphenol a on Lignin-Derived Biochars: Role of Thermal and Phosphoric Acid Activation in Surface Functionalization and Mechanism. Polymers . 2025, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Gęca, M.; Khalil, A.M.; Tang, M.; Bhakta, A.K.; Snoussi, Y.; Nowicki, P.; Wiśniewska, M.; Chehimi, M.M. Surface Treatment of Biochar—Methods, Surface Analysis and Potential Applications: A Comprehensive Review. Surfaces 2023, 6, 179–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Jiju, P.S.; Singhania, R.R.; Shruthy, N.S.; Shalu, S.; Di Dong, C.; Patel, A.K. Lignin-Derived Biomaterials for Environmental Application, Advancements in Sustainable Leather and Bioplastic Production: A Review. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2025, 322, 146887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Ioannidou, O.; Zabaniotou, A. Agricultural Residues as Precursors for Activated Carbon Production-A Review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2007, 11, 1966–2005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Feng, S.; Ouyang, Q.; Huang, J.; Zhang, X.; Ma, Z.; Liang, K.; Huang, Q. Conversion of Lignin into Porous Carbons for High-Performance Supercapacitors via Spray Drying and KOH Activation: Structure-Properties Relationship and Reaction Mechanism. J. Renew. Mater. 2024, 12, 1207–1218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Xue, Y.; Kamali, M.; Aminabhavi, T.; Appels, L.; Dewil, R. Tailoring the Surface Functional Groups of Biochar for Enhanced Adsorption and Degradation of Pharmaceutically Active Compounds. Chem. Eng. J. 2024, 491, 152037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Hu, M.; Chen, J.; Liu, Y. Structural Properties and Adsorption Performance Relationship towards Three Categories of Lignin and Their Derived Biochar. Bioresour. Technol. 2024, 401, 130712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Chen, W.; Zhang, J.; Hong, T.; Peng, X.; Fu, F. Dual Heteroatom-Doped Porous Biochar from Chitosan/Lignosulfonate Gels for Enhanced Removal of Tetracycline by Persulfate Activation: Performance and Mechanism. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2025, 295, 139690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Sun, Y.; Jia, J.; Huo, L.; Zhao, L.; Yao, Z.; Liu, Z. Heteroatom-Doped Biochar for CO2 Adsorption: A Review of Heteroatoms, Doping Methods, and Functions. Biomass Convers. Biorefin. 2024, 14, 15237–15249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Tang, D.; Lu, L.; Luo, Z.; Yang, B.; Ke, J.; Lei, W.; Zhen, H.; Zhuang, Y.; Sun, J.; Chen, K.; et al. Heteroatom-Doped Hierarchically Porous Biochar for Supercapacitor Application and Phenol Pollutant Remediation. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 2586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Lotfy, V.F.; Basta, A.H. Sustainable Heteroatom Doped Biochar for Methylene Blue Adsorption with Structure Function Insights. Sci. Rep. 2026, 16, 13153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Yi, Y.; Huang, Z.; Lu, B.; Xian, J.; Tsang, E.P.; Cheng, W.; Fang, J.; Fang, Z. Magnetic Biochar for Environmental Remediation: A Review. Bioresour. Technol. 2020, 298, 122468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Liu, C.; Xu, X.; He, A.; Zhang, Y.; Che, R.; Yang, L.; Wei, J.; Wang, F.; Hua, J.; Shi, J. Research Progress on the Preparation of Iron-Manganese Modified Biochar and Its Application in Environmental Remediation. Toxics 2025, 13, 618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Wang, Y.; Zhang, B.; Liang, S.; Wang, J.; Yu, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Tan, J.; Li, Y.; Tao, Y.; Li, J.; et al. Fe-Mg Co-Modified Biochar for Simultaneous Retention of Ammonium and Phosphate in Soils: Interfacial Mechanisms and Performance. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2026, 395, 137815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Nguyen, T.B.; Sherpa, K.; Bui, X.T.; Nguyen, V.T.; Vo, T.D.H.; Ho, H.T.T.; Chen, C.W.; Dong, C. D. Biochar for Soil Remediation: A Comprehensive Review of Current Research on Pollutant Removal. Environ. Pollut. 2023, 337, 122571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Lee, Z.; Abdullah, R.; Yaacob, J.S.; Mohd Rosli, N.S. Engineering Biochar through Surface Oxygenation: A Green Approach for Sustainable Environmental Applications. Clean. Technol. Environ. Policy 2026, 28, 118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Mim, S.; Hashem, M.A.; Miem, M.M.; Rahman, M.A. Biochar from Tannery Liming Sludge for Dyeing Wastewater Treatment: Process Optimization, Performance Evaluation, Kinetics, and Isotherm Studies. Next Mater. 2026, 11, 101674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Mohan, D.; Sarswat, A.; Ok, Y.S.; Pittman, C.U. Organic and Inorganic Contaminants Removal from Water with Biochar, a Renewable, Low Cost and Sustainable Adsorbent - A Critical Review. Bioresour. Technol. 2014, 160, 191–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Zheng, Y.; Wu, X.; Zhou, T.; Yi, C.; Xiang, W.; Huang, M. Persistent Free Radicals and Oxygen Functionalities in Biochar via Lignin Valorization for High-Capacity Pollutant Polymerization. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2025, 13, 119122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Wei, K.; Lv, T.; Wang, T.; Zhou, H.; Jiang, Y.; Qin, X.; Liu, Z. High Adsorption of Methyl Orange by Nitrogen-Doped Activated Carbon Derived from Kraft Lignin via Self-Activation. Surf. Interfaces 2023, 42, 103484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Brazil, T.R.; Gonçalves, M.; Junior, M.S.O.; Rezende, M.C. Sustainable Process to Produce Activated Carbon from Kraft Lignin Impregnated with H3PO4 Using Microwave Pyrolysis. Biomass Bioenergy 2022, 156, 106333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Guo, D.; Hu, D.; Yan, Z.; Yuan, K.; Sha, L.; Zhao, H.; Chen, J.; Liu, B. Preparation and Characteristic of High Surface Area Lignin-Based Porous Carbon by Potassium Tartrate Activation. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2021, 326, 111340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Gutiérrez, M. del C.; García-Mateos, F.J.; Ruiz-Rosas, R.; Rosas, J.M.; Rodríguez-Mirasol, J.; Cordero, T. Evaluation of Acetanilide and Antipyrine Adsorption on Lignin-Derived Activated Carbons. Environ. Res. 2024, 252, 118918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Wang, J.; Fan, D.; Zhang, L.; Yang, D.; Qiu, X.; Lin, X. Lignin-Derived Hierarchical Porous Carbon with High Surface Area and Interconnected Pores for Efficient Antibiotics Adsorption. Chem. Eng. J. 2023, 454, 139789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Cai, Z.; Qiu, X.; Fu, F.; Bai, D.; Lin, X. Preparation of Nitrogen-Doped Lignin Porous Carbon Using Low Dosage KHCO3 for Efficient Methylene Blue Adsorption: Activation Mechanism and Adsorption Performance. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2025, 287, 138319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Álvarez-Montero, M.A.; Sanz-Santos, E.; Gómez-Avilés, A.; Belver, C.; Bedia, J. Lignin-Based Activated Carbon as an Effective Adsorbent for the Removal of Polystyrene Nanoplastics: Insights from Adsorption Kinetics and Equilibrium Studies. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2025, 361, 131380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Sun, Y.; Wang, T.; Han, C.; Bai, L.; Sun, X. One-Step Preparation of Lignin-Based Magnetic Biochar as Bifunctional Material for the Efficient Removal of Cr(VI) and Congo Red: Performance and Practical Application. Bioresour. Technol. 2023, 369, 128373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. de Araújo Padilha, C.E.; da Costa Nogueira, C.; de Santana Souza, D.F.; de Oliveira, J.A.; dos Santos, E.S. Organosolv Lignin/Fe3O4 Nanoparticles Applied as a β-Glucosidase Immobilization Support and Adsorbent for Textile Dye Removal. Ind. Crops Prod. 2020, 146, 112167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Wang, J.; Wang, S. Preparation, Modification and Environmental Application of Biochar: A Review. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 227, 1002–1022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Sellaoui, L.; Gómez-Avilés, A.; Dhaouadi, F.; Bedia, J.; Bonilla-Petriciolet, A.; Rtimi, S.; Belver, C. Adsorption of Emerging Pollutants on Lignin-Based Activated Carbon: Analysis of Adsorption Mechanism via Characterization, Kinetics and Equilibrium Studies. Chem. Eng. J. 2023, 452, 139399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Kümmerer, K. The Presence of Pharmaceuticals in the Environment Due to Human Use – Present Knowledge and Future Challenges. J. Environ. Manag. 2009, 90, 2354–2366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Popovic, A.L.; Rusmirovic, J.D.; Velickovic, Z.; Kovacevic, T.; Jovanovic, A.; Cvijetic, I.; Marinkovic, A.D. Kinetics and Column Adsorption Study of Diclofenac and Heavy-Metal Ions Removal by Amino-Functionalized Lignin Microspheres. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2021, 93, 302–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Xiang, W.; Zhang, X.; Luo, J.; Li, Y.; Guo, T.; Gao, B. Performance of Lignin Impregnated Biochar on Tetracycline Hydrochloride Adsorption: Governing Factors and Mechanisms. Environ. Res. 2022, 215, 114339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Fan, Z.; Fang, J.; Zhang, G.; Qin, L.; Fang, Z.; Jin, L. Improved Adsorption of Tetracycline in Water by a Modified Caulis Spatholobi Residue Biochar. ACS Omega 2022, 7, 30543–30553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Tong, Y.; Mayer, B.K.; McNamara, P.J. Triclosan Adsorption Using Wastewater Biosolids-Derived Biochar. Environ. Sci. Water Res. Technol. 2016, 2, 761–768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Cho, E.J.; Moon, J.K.; Lee, C.G.; Park, S.J. Removal of Triclosan from Aqueous Solution Using Biochar Derived from Seed Shell of Aesculus Turbinata. Desalin. Water Treat. 2022, 266, 256–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Hernández-Abreu, A.B.; Álvarez-Torrellas, S.; Rocha, R.P.; Pereira, M.F.R.; Águeda, V.I.; Delgado, J.A.; Larriba, M.; García, J.; Figueiredo, J.L. Effective Adsorption of the Endocrine Disruptor Compound Bisphenol a from Water on Surface-Modified Carbon Materials. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2021, 552, 149513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Mel, M.; Lau, B.; Hockaday, W.C. Sorption of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances by Lignin in Pulp and Paper Wastewater. J. Hazard. Mater. 2024, 480, 136016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Roman, J.B.; Kemperman, A.J.B.; van der Meer, W.G.J.; Wood, J.A. Assessing the Viability of Bio-Based Adsorbents for PFAS Removal. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2025, 306, 121215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Clouse, D.E.; He, J.; Wang, D.; Davis, V.A. Tailored Activated Carbons from Biomass Components for Aqueous PFAS Adsorption. Mater. Lett. 2025, 384, 138050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Ahmad, M.; Rajapaksha, A.U.; Lim, J.E.; Zhang, M.; Bolan, N.; Mohan, D.; Vithanage, M.; Lee, S.S.; Ok, Y.S. Biochar as a Sorbent for Contaminant Management in Soil and Water: A Review. Chemosphere 2014, 99, 19–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Ganzagh, S.G.; Yousefi, A.R.; Rahdar, A.; Mohammadi, M. Lignin-Based Nanoencapsulation for Sustainable Herbicide Delivery: Controlled Release and Bioactivity of 2,4-D and MCPA Compared to Commercial Formulations. Sci. Rep. 2025, 15, 24532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Chowdhury, M.A. The Controlled Release of Bioactive Compounds from Lignin and Lignin-Based Biopolymer Matrices. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2014, 65, 136–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Flores-Céspedes, F.; Daza-Fernández, I.; Villafranca-Sánchez, M.; Fernández-Pérez, M.; Morillo, E.; Undabeytia, T. Lignin and Ethylcellulose in Controlled Release Formulations to Reduce Leaching of Chloridazon and Metribuzin in Light-Textured Soils. J. Hazard. Mater. 2018, 343, 227–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Kah, M.; Beulke, S.; Tiede, K.; Hofmann, T. Nanopesticides: State of Knowledge, Environmental Fate, and Exposure Modeling. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2013, 43, 1823–1867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Zhang, Y.; Jiao, G.; Wang, J.; She, D. Preparation of Lignin-Based Slow-Release Nitrogen Fertilizer. Sustainability 2024, 16, 10289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Dong, H.; Tang, S.; Zhang, L.; Tong, Z.; Wu, Z.; Zhan, P.; Shao, L.; Qing, Y.; Liu, J. Wood-Derived Bio-Coating Materials Incorporating Hydrophobic Lignin and Hierarchically Porous Biochar for High-Efficiency Coating Slow-Release Fertilizers. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023, 242, 124769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Seddighi, H.; Shayesteh, K.; Omrani, N. Acetylated Lignin Sulfonate as a Biodegradable Coating for Controlled-Release Urea Fertilizer: A Novel Acetylation Method and Diffusion Coefficient Analysis. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 277, 134190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Mo, D.; Li, X.; Chen, Y.; Jiang, Y.; Gan, C.; Zhang, Y.; Li, W.; Huang, Y.; Cui, J. Fabrication and Evaluation of Slow-Release Lignin-Based Avermectin Nano-Delivery System with UV-Shielding Property. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 23248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Li, Y.; Zhou, M.; Pang, Y.; Qiu, X. Lignin-Based Microsphere: Preparation and Performance on Encapsulating the Pesticide Avermectin. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2017, 5, 3321–3328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Weiss, R.; Ghitti, E.; Sumetzberger-Hasinger, M.; Guebitz, G.M.; Nyanhongo, G.S. Lignin-Based Pesticide Delivery System. ACS Omega 2020, 5, 4322–4329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Pang, Y.; Li, X.; Wang, S.; Qiu, X.; Yang, D.; Lou, H. Lignin-Polyurea Microcapsules with Anti-Photolysis and Sustained-Release Performances Synthesized via Pickering Emulsion Template. React. Funct. Polym. 2018, 123, 115–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Gamaralalage, D.; Rodgers, S.; Gill, A.; Meredith, W.; Bott, T.; West, H.; Alce, J.; Snape, C.; McKechnie, J. Biowaste to Biochar: A Techno-Economic and Life Cycle Assessment of Biochar Production from Food-Waste Digestate and Its Agricultural Field Application. Biochar 2025, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Dong, X.; Chu, Y.; Tong, Z.; Sun, M.; Meng, D.; Yi, X.; Gao, T.; Wang, M.; Duan, J. Mechanisms of Adsorption and Functionalization of Biochar for Pesticides: A Review. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2024, 272, 116019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Schematic representation of lignin valorization within biorefineries, illustrating the conversion of lignocellulosic biomass into lignin-derived biochar and its applications in environmental remediation and controlled release systems.
Figure 1. Schematic representation of lignin valorization within biorefineries, illustrating the conversion of lignocellulosic biomass into lignin-derived biochar and its applications in environmental remediation and controlled release systems.
Preprints 214845 g001
Figure 2. Structure-property-function relationships in lignin-derived biochar, linking lignin structure, thermochemical conversion processes, material properties, and applications.
Figure 2. Structure-property-function relationships in lignin-derived biochar, linking lignin structure, thermochemical conversion processes, material properties, and applications.
Preprints 214845 g002
Figure 3. Main mechanisms involved in the adsorption of emerging contaminants on lignin-derived biochar, including π-π stacking, hydrogen bonding, electrostatic interactions, pore filling, and hydrophobic interactions. These mechanisms are governed by the aromatic structure, surface functional groups, and porosity of LDB.
Figure 3. Main mechanisms involved in the adsorption of emerging contaminants on lignin-derived biochar, including π-π stacking, hydrogen bonding, electrostatic interactions, pore filling, and hydrophobic interactions. These mechanisms are governed by the aromatic structure, surface functional groups, and porosity of LDB.
Preprints 214845 g003
Figure 4. Main mechanisms involved in the controlled release of active compounds from lignin-derived biochar (LDB), including diffusion, matrix degradation, stimulus-responsive release, and swelling-induced release. In LDB systems, these mechanisms are strongly influenced by the aromatic carbon framework, pore structure, and surface functional groups inherited from lignin, which collectively determine release kinetics and environmental responsiveness.
Figure 4. Main mechanisms involved in the controlled release of active compounds from lignin-derived biochar (LDB), including diffusion, matrix degradation, stimulus-responsive release, and swelling-induced release. In LDB systems, these mechanisms are strongly influenced by the aromatic carbon framework, pore structure, and surface functional groups inherited from lignin, which collectively determine release kinetics and environmental responsiveness.
Preprints 214845 g004
Table 1. Table 1. Lignin-derived biochar for environmental pollutant removal: influence of precursor, processing conditions, and material properties on adsorption performance.
Table 1. Table 1. Lignin-derived biochar for environmental pollutant removal: influence of precursor, processing conditions, and material properties on adsorption performance.
Lignin precursor Pyrolysis / synthesis conditions Activation / modification Key properties Dominant mechanism Application / performance Reference
Kraft lignin in black liquor Pyrolysis (850 °C) Self-activation + N-doping Surface area: 1124 m²·g⁻¹; porous structure π–π interactions, electrostatic attraction Methyl orange adsorption [52]
Kraft lignin Microwave pyrolysis H₃PO₄ activation Surface area: 635–1055 m²·g⁻¹; micro/mesoporous Pore filling, electrostatic interactions Methylene blue and amoxicillin removal [53]
Alkali lignin Pyrolysis (800 °C) Potassium tartrate activation Surface area: 1911 m²·g⁻¹; microporous π–π interactions, pore filling Methyl orange adsorption [54]
Organosolv lignin Pyrolysis (500–900 °C) H₃PO₄ activation >1000 m²·g⁻¹; micro/mesoporous Hydrophobic interactions, pore filling Pharmaceutical adsorption [55]
Lignosulfonate Pyrolysis (850 °C) CaCO₃ templating Surface area: 2944 m²·g⁻¹; hierarchical porosity Pore trapping, diffusion Antibiotic adsorption [56]
Biorefinery lignin Pyrolysis (800 °C) KHCO₃ + melamine (N-doping) Surface area: 3423 m²·g⁻¹; highly porous π–π interactions, electrostatic attraction Methylene blue adsorption [57]
Lignin (various) Pyrolysis (600 °C) ZnCl₂ activation Developed porosity; aromatic structure π–π interactions, pore filling Dye adsorption [39]
Lignin Pyrolysis (900 °C) FeCl₃ / H₃PO₄ / KOH activation 467–1389 m²·g⁻¹; micro/mesoporous Hydrophobic + electrostatic interactions Nanoplastics adsorption [58]
Lignin-based magnetic biochar Hydrothermal (200 °C) Fe₃O₄ modification Magnetic, 152 m²·g⁻¹ Electrostatic + redox interactions Cr(VI) + dye removal [59]
Organosolv lignin NR Fe₃O₄ nanoparticles Functionalized surface Adsorption + catalytic effects Textile dye removal [60]
NR: Non reported.
Table 2. Studies on lignin-derived porous carbon, lignin/biochar hybrid coatings, and lignin-based carriers for controlled release of fertilizers and pesticides.
Table 2. Studies on lignin-derived porous carbon, lignin/biochar hybrid coatings, and lignin-based carriers for controlled release of fertilizers and pesticides.
Lignin precursor Pyrolysis / synthesis conditions Activation / modification Key properties Dominant mechanism Application / performance Reference
Industrial alkaline lignin (IAL) Hydrothermal carbonization/activation; optimum synthesis reported at 220 °C Porous carbon from IAL + urea, extrusion granulation Specific surface area 1923.51–1935.5 m²·g⁻¹; pore volume 0.82 cm³·g⁻¹ Nutrient adsorption in porous carbon + diffusion-limited release Slow-release N fertilizer; soil-column tests showed lower cumulative leaching of NH₄⁺-N, NO₃⁻-N and total N than conventional urea [78]
Wood-derived lignin + activated biochar Bio-coating material prepared from wood waste; applied as coating on urea fertilizer Palmitoyl-chloride-grafted lignin (PCL) + activated biochar (ABC) Hydrophobic coating; water contact angle 90.72°; ABC with high surface area and hierarchical porosity Hydrophobic barrier + pore-regulated ion transport Coated slow-release urea; nitrogen release persistence for 40 days in soil; also reduced Cr accumulation in rice roots in hydroponics [79]
Lignosulfonate / lignin sulfonate Coating process for urea (not pyrolysis-based; lignin coating, not LDB) Acetylation with decanoyl chloride to reduce hydrophilicity Biodegradable coating membrane; diffusion coefficient modeled for N release Diffusion-controlled release across lignin-derived coating Controlled-release urea fertilizer; study demonstrates delayed nutrient transfer and models effective diffusion coefficient through the coating [80]
Sodium lignosulfonate High-speed emulsification + ultrasonic dispersion; crosslinking with p-phenylenediamine diazonium salt Nano-delivery formulation Particle size 80–150 nm; UV-shielding behavior Encapsulation + pH-responsive diffusion/release Avermectin nanoformulation; anti-photolysis stability reported as 3–4× that of free avermectin, with pH-responsive controlled release [81]
Sodium lignosulfonate (self-assembled lignin microspheres) Self-assembly of SL-CTAB colloidal spheres (not pyrolysis-based; lignin carrier, not LDB) Surfactant-assisted microsphere formation Uniform colloidal spheres; AVM encapsulation with high loading reported in abstract/snippet Encapsulation + UV protection + sustained release Avermectin carrier; lignin microspheres protect AVM against photodegradation and act as a controlled/sustained-release shell [82]
Lignosulfonate granules Enzymatic granulation using laccase (not pyrolysis-based; lignin carrier, not LDB) 100% lignosulfonate-based biodegradable solid carrier Granular biobased carrier Matrix dissolution + diffusion-controlled herbicide release Dicamba delivery; complete release after 48 h according to HPLC analysis [83])
Lignin particle-stabilized microcapsules Pickering emulsion template + interfacial polymerization (not pyrolysis-based; lignin carrier, not LDB) Lignin-polyurea microcapsules Spherical capsules with double-layer shell; mean diameter 10–100 μm Barrier-controlled sustained release + photoprotection Avermectin carrier with anti-photolysis and sustained-release performance [84]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

Privacy Settings

© 2026 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated