Submitted:
15 May 2026
Posted:
19 May 2026
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Disordered eating in young adults is shaped by sociocultural pressures and may be modulated by genetic variation. We examined sex differences in eating-pathology, psychosocial correlates, at two candidate loci Hypocretin and Neuropeptide S (HCRTR1 rs10914456; NPSR1 rs324981). A total of 550 individuals visiting various nutrition clinics were initially approached for participation in the study. Of these, 460 consented to take part ,after exclusions, 360 completed SCOFF; 200 scoring >2 proceeded to EAT-26 and comprised the analytic sample (100 males, 100 females). Psychosocial factors (media influence, academic pressure, peer pressure, isolation/loneliness, and K-pop self-comparison) were assessed by a structured questionnaire. EAT-26 total and subscales were compared by sex (t-tests). Genotypes were contrasted by sex using χ² tests; allele frequencies were derived from genotype counts and ORs with CI were computed. Females showed higher EAT-26 total scores than males (29.7±1.9 vs 23.2±1.3; t(198)=2.82, p<0.005); 68% of females and 76% of males scored ≥20. Anorexia subscale scores were greater in females (t(198)=3.713, p<0.0003), as well as binge-eating scores (t(198)=1.722, p<0.05); bulimia indices did not differ by sex (p>0.05). Body dissatisfaction was common (87%) without sex difference (p>0.05).Significant sex associations were observed for media influence (χ²=67.94, p<0.05), academic pressure (χ²=45.6, p<0.0001), K-pop self-comparison (χ²=112.12, p<0.0001), peer pressure (χ²=46.37, p<0.05),and isolation/loneliness (χ²=28.72, p<0.0001).Genotyping data revealed marked sex-dependent associations at both loci. For HCRTR1 rs10914456, female cases showed a significantly higher frequency of the risk (TT) genotype, conferring 4.86-fold greater odds of carrying T-allele relative to males (OR = 4.86, 95% CI: 1.46–16.17, p = 0.001). In contrast, for NPSR1 rs324981, males exhibited a pronounced T-allele–driven risk pattern, being T-carriers (AT+TT) relative to females (OR = 4.11, 95% CI 1.23–13.68, p = 0.022).Within females specifically, the AA genotype was significantly overrepresented compared with T-carrying genotypes (AA vs AT+TT: OR = 3.25, 95% CI: 1.59–6.66, p = 0.0013).Collectively, these results highlight a female-specific recessive risk pattern at HCRTR1 and a male-specific dominant T-allele effect at NPSR1, underscoring robust sex-differentiated genetic susceptibility to disordered eating. Overall females exhibited severe eating-pathology and heightened psychosocial sensitivity than males, while genetic risk showed locus-specific sex patterns. Integrating psychosocial screening with genetic profiling may lead to early intervention.