Preprint
Article

This version is not peer-reviewed.

Rational Design, Characterization, and Therapeutic Evaluation of Niclosamide-Nafamostat Co-Crystal Systems for Oncology and SARS-CoV-2 Infection

Submitted:

05 May 2026

Posted:

06 May 2026

You are already at the latest version

Abstract
Background/Objectives: Niclosamide, an established anthelmintic drug, has shown promise in overcoming various types of drug-resistant cancers. However, despite its potent anti-proliferative effects, niclosamide suffers from low aqueous solubility, which can certainly limit oral bioavailability. To address these limitations and improve its physicochemical and pharmacokinetic properties, cocrystallization was employed as a strategic approach. Methods: In this study, we developed a niclosamide–nafamostat pharmaceutical cocrystal using a conventional solvent evaporation technique. The newly formed cocrystal was characterized using X-ray powder diffraction (XRPD), Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), which collectively indicated that hydrogen bonds between the drug and co-former were the primary stabilizing interaction. Results: The NNC cocrystal was structurally confirmed by NMR, indicating the presence of hydrogen bonding, which was further supported by FTIR and XRD analyses. The antiproliferative activity of the cocrystal was evaluated across multiple cancer cell lines, where it exhibited approximately tenfold higher cytotoxicity compared to the parent compounds. Additionally, antiviral efficacy against SARS-CoV-2–infected cells demonstrated a potency of 0.17 µM, representing more than a twentyfold improvement over the standard drug. In vivo studies revealed that the cocrystal achieved a twofold enhancement in tumor growth suppression and a tenfold reduction in tumor burden relative to the control treatment, with high statistical significance (p < 0.0001). Conclusion: This cocrystallization approach a promising strategy to enhance drug solubility, bioavailability, and therapeutic efficacy, potentially enabling optimized dosing for future clinical applications.
Keywords: 
;  ;  ;  ;  ;  

1. Introduction

Cocrystal drug development is a rapidly evolving area of pharmaceutical research aimed at overcoming the limitations imposed by scientists, clinicians, and patients [1,2] for the treatment cancer, which is one of the leading causes of death worldwide [3,4]. Cocrystal is a powerful strategy in drug development to optimize the physicochemical and biopharmaceutical properties active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs), which are poorly soluble compounds in Biopharmaceutics Classification System (BCS) classes II and IV [5,6,7]. By tailoring intermolecular interactions in the solid state without altering the covalent structure or primary pharmacology of the APIs can improve solubility, stability, and bioavailability by pharmaceutical cocrystals method. In similar, repurposing and reformulation of old drugs with newly recognized anticancer and antiviral activities, and it has become an attractive approach to accelerate therapeutic innovation. Niclosamide, an FDA-approved anthelmintic agent and several studies shown that niclosamide overcomes chemotherapy resistance across diverse tumor types, in part by modulating key signaling pathways, inducing apoptosis, and suppressing cancer stem cell–like phenotypes. Niclosamide has also been reported to enhance the efficacy of immunotherapies, including immune checkpoint blockades. Niclosamide has demonstrated by reshaping the tumor microenvironment and attenuating immune evasion mechanisms driven by cancer stem cells [8]. COVID-19 as a declaration for pandemic disease by the World Health Organization. Many individuals were continue to suffer from severe illness or death due to infection with COVID-19, caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) [9,10,11]. Despite this promise, niclosamide has poor aqueous solubility and limited systemic exposure are considered major barriers to clinical translation in oncology.
Nafamostat mesylate (Nafamostat) is clinically used for the treatment of acute pancreatitis, acute respiratory distress, and disseminated intravascular coagulation as a serine protease inhibitor [12]. Niclosamide potently inhibits TMPRSS2-mediated priming of the viral spike protein and it blocks viral entry into human airway epithelial cells, it has attracted attention as a candidate therapeutic for SARS-CoV-2 infection [13]. Nafamostat distinctly reduces SARS-CoV-2 infection and associated lung pathology in cell and animal model at clinically achievable concentrations, making it a promising antiviral agent for hospitalized COVID 19 patients [14,15]. Additionally, nafamostat has shown anticancer and anti-inflammatory activities, enhancing the possibility of dual utility in lung cancer and virus-infected lung tissue. However, due to rapid hydrolysis and limited specificity and exposure constrain nafamostat therapeutic window and complicate sustained systemic treatment [16,17].
Pharmaceutical cocrystallization, defined as the formation of a single crystalline phase comprising two or more drug molecules held together by non-covalent interactions. It occurs in deferent way, such as hydrogen bonding, van der Waals forces, and π–π stacking, offers an attractive route to address these limitations [18,19]. Cocrystal synthesized different methods such as solution-based methods (e.g., solvent evaporation, cooling crystallization, spray drying) or solvent-free/mechanochemical approaches (e.g., neat or liquid-assisted grinding, hot-melt extrusion), enabling scalable and industrially relevant manufacture [20]. Current scenario, dual-API cocrystals demonstrates that combining two drugs in a single solid form can improve dissolution, control release, and potentially enable synergistic pharmacological effects with reduced dose- and formulation-related toxicity [21,22].
Having potent anticancer and antiviral profiles of niclosamide and nafamostat, as well as their recognized anti-inflammatory activities, co-engineer of dual drug of these agents as a strong rationale to overcome their solubility and bioavailability constraints and to enhance systemic exposure. In this research, we aim to design and develop a dual system of niclosamide–nafamostat cocrystal (NNC), potentially with suitable co-formers, to modulate the intermolecular packing and optimize key physicochemical parameters such as solubility, dissolution rate, and solid-state stability. Structural characterization of NNC, coupled with in vitro and in vivo evaluation of its anticancer and antiviral efficacy in human lung cell models, is expected to clarify whether this dual drug cocrystal, can deliver superior therapeutic performance compared with the individual and their physical mixtures. Eventually, our research strategy may support the development of an innovative solid dosage form capable of simultaneously targeting lung cancer progression and SARS CoV 2 infection while mitigating dose-limiting toxicity and pharmacokinetic shortcomings.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

Niclosamide was purchased from Hengcheng Pharmaceuticals, Quinzhuhu, China. Nafamostat mesylate was purchased from Kukjeon, Hwaseong-si, Republic of Korea, and Sodium bicarbonate was obtained from Emmennar (Hyderabad, India). Phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), polyvinylpyrrolidone 30 (PVP 30), sodium bicarbonate, ethyl alcohol, methyl alcohol, acetonitrile, tetrahydrofuran, 2-propanol, and N, dimethylformamide were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich, USA. All the chemicals were used without further purification.

2.1. Noclosamide-Nafamostat Supramolecular Complex Preparation

Nafamostat was dissolved in distilled water at room temperature using a mechanical stirrer at 500 rpm. Sodium carbonate was dissolved in a separate vessel, and the clear solution was slowly added to the reaction vessels containing nafamostat with strong mechanical stirring. The reaction solution was filtered, and the filtrate was collected and stored in a reaction vessel. Niclosamide was dissolved in acetone in a separate vessel and filtered. Transfer the niclosamide solution to the Nafamostat vessel and heat the reaction vessel with the set temperature at 60 °C. The reaction vessels containing the nafamostat solution are stirred at room temperature at a speed of 4000 rpm for 1 h. After stirring, the solvent was removed by filtration through a vacuum pump and filter. The newly prepared cocrystals were dried under reduced pressure using a vacuum dryer for one day.

2.3. Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (1H-NMR)

The 1H-NMR samples were prepared using 10 mg of the cocrystal sample dissolved in DMSO-D6, followed by a filled-in NMR detection tube. The 1H-NMR spectra were recorded using a 600 MHz nuclear magnetic resonance spectrophotometer (AVANCE III 600, Bruker, Massachusetts, USA).

2.4. Powder X-Ray Diffraction (PXRD)

PXRD data were recorded on a Rigaku SmartLab X-ray diffractometer (Tokyo, Japan) with Cu Kα radiation at 40 kV and 15 mA. The analysis was performed with a step size of 0.02° in the 2θ range from 4° to 45°.

2.5. Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC)

Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) was performed using a NETZSCH DSC214 instrument (Selb, Germany) under a nitrogen gas atmosphere (40 mL/min). Each sample was sealed in a perforated aluminum pan, and analysis was performed over a temperature range from 0 °C to 300 °C at a heating rate of 10 °C/min.

2.6. Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR)

The FTIR spectra was analyzed using a Cary 640 FTIR spectrophotometer (Alginate Technology, Cary 600 Series FTIR spectrophotometer, California, USA). The Potassium Bromide (KBr) method was used to prepare the test samples, and KBr was used to form a thin pellet. The pellet was then placed under the sample holder of the FTIR spectrophotometer.

2.7. Cell Culture and IC50 Determination

Breast cancer cell lines (MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231), pancreatic cancer cell lines (PANC-1 and MIA PaCa-2), and non-small lung cancer cell lines (A-549 and H-1299) were used in this study. Cells were cultured in DMEM containing 10% FBS and 1% antibiotics (Gibco), and cell lines were maintained at 37 °C and 5% CO2 atmosphere. The IC50 of NNC was measured using a cell viability assay. Six cell lines were used, and cell viability was measured using a CCK-8 assay kit (Abcam). Cells were seeded at 2-4 × 103 cells/well in 96-well plates overnight. NNCs were treated for 48 h at concentrations of 0.3, 3, 30, 300, 3000, and 30000 ng/mL in triplicate. Cell viability was assayed following the manufacturer’s protocol, and the IC50 was determined.

2.8. In Vivo Cytotoxicity Study

Fifteen female nonobese diabetic/severe combined immunodeficiency (NOD/SCID) mice were purchased from the Biotechnology Research Institute, Daejeon, Korea. The NOD/SCID mice were used for in vivo experiments, which allow for the engraftment and growth of human tumors. All animals received human care during housing and breeding in compliance with the Guide for Care and Use of Laboratory Animals published by the National Institute of Health. This test was conducted on animals at the National Cancer Center with the Animal Protection Act and the Act on Laboratory Animals. The study was performed according to a protocol approved by the ethics committee (NCC-21-702). Mice were randomly divided into three groups (n=5 each). The anticancer effectiveness was measured using an orthotropic model with PNAC-1 cells at a density of 1 × 106/50 μl per subject. NNCs, at the concentrations of 15 mg/kg and 30 mg/kg, were dissolved in a vehicle containing 97.5% PBS and 2.5% PVP 30, administered for four weeks, and tumor mass and tumor burden were determined.

2.9. In Vivo Antivirus Efficacy

Vero cells (1.2 x 104) were seeded per well in 384 tissue culture plates to assess antivirus efficacy. After 24 hours, the cells were treated with a compound prepared by serially diluting 2-fold in DMSO to a peak concentration of 50 µM at 10 points. Approximately 1 hour after compound treatment, the cells were infected with SARS-CoV-2 (0.0125 MOI) in a BSL3 facility and cultured at 37 °C for 24 hours. Subsequently, the cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) and permeabilized. Then, the cells were treated with the anti-SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid (N) primary antibody, followed by treatment with the Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG secondary antibody and Hoechst 33342 to stain the cells. Fluorescence images of the infected cells were acquired using the high-throughput imaging analyzer Operetta (Perkin Elmer, Illinois, USA).

2.10. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism to determine significant difference. A student t-test was used to compare two groups with a significance threshold set at P<0.05.

3. Results and Discussion:

3.1. Proton Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (1H NMR)

The combination of NNC was successfully prepared using a solution precipitation method. Upon complete solubilization of the components, intermolecular hydrogen-bonding interactions were established between the drug molecules, facilitating cocrystal formation. Structural confirmation was initially performed using proton nuclear magnetic resonance (1H NMR) spectroscopy for the confirmation of chemical environments and characteristic shifts corresponding to niclosamide and nafamostat. The downfield shift of the hydroxyl proton to 13.92 ppm (Figure 1a, sup Figures S1–S3) confirms the formation of an O–H···N hydrogen bond, indicating that an aromatic nitrogen from the nafamostat is acting as the primary hydrogen-bond acceptor for the niclosamide hydroxyl group.

3.2. Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy

Cocrystal formation was attained through Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy for further structural confirmation of the cocrystal. The FTIR spectra revealed significant shifts in vibrational frequencies, indicating the formation of hydrogen-bonding interactions. Specifically, the characteristic O–H (phenolic) and N–H stretching vibrations of niclosamide, originally observed in the range of 3300–3400 cm−1, shifted and broadened to 3252–3093 cm−1 in the cocrystal, suggesting strong intermolecular interactions (Figure 1d). Additionally, the amide I band corresponding to C=O stretching was observed at approximately 1650 cm−1. Changes in peaks around 889 cm−1 further supported the involvement of niclosamide functional groups in hydrogen bonding with nafamostat. The presence of S=O and C–O stretching vibrations in the 1000–1200 cm−1 region indicated the formation of a new molecular environment within the cocrystal. Peak shift changes at 1070 cm−1 region due to the crystal lattice environment of Hydrogen bonding compared the carbonyl group.

3.3. Powder X-Ray Diffraction

Powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) analysis provided definitive evidence for the formation of a new crystalline phase. Main diagnostic peaks for characteristics identification in 9.44°, 11.62°, 15.19°, 15.90°, 16.93°, 17.73°, 23.35°, 25.00°, 25.66° and 27.25°. The NNC cocrystal exhibited distinct diffraction peaks at 2θ values of 7.096°, 9.046°, 9.68°, 12.84°, 15.16°, 15.99°, 16.36°, 17.65°, 23.14°, and 26.14°, which were absent in the diffraction patterns of the individual components (Figure 1b). The appearance of new peaks, or shifts relative to those of pure niclosamide and nafamostat mesylate, supports the formation of a cocrystal. The overall diffraction pattern changes due to the creation of a new crystal lattice, and the patent also attributes certain peak shifts to the influence of non-stoichiometric hydrate forms in some comparisons. This confirms that the cocrystal is a new solid-state phase resulting from specific intermolecular interactions between the two drug molecules.

3.4. Differential Scanning Calorimetry

Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) analysis further supported cocrystal formation. Niclosamide and nafamostat exhibited endothermic melting peaks at 230.57 °C and 264.51 °C, respectively (Figure 1c). In contrast, the NNC cocrystal showed a single, distinct endothermic peak at 209.83 °C with a lower melting enthalpy (94.38 J/g), indicating altered intermolecular interactions and reduced lattice energy. This decrease in melting enthalpy suggests improved solubility and dissolution properties of the concrete system compared to the starting materials. Intermediate peaks in the 90–120 °C range can come from solid-state phase transitions, eutectic melting, or partial dissociation of the crystal lattice between niclosamide and nafamostate mesylate. A higher peak approaching multiple endothermic peaks at 92.9 and 209.83 °C is likely the main melting or decomposition-related event of the remaining crystalline fraction, indicating a complex thermal behavior rather than a simple physical mixture. Because pure niclosamide melts closer to 228 °C, a shift downward suggests crystal lattice weakening, impurity effects, or new intermolecular interactions with nafamostat mesylate.

3.5. In Vitro Cell Viability Assay

In vitro cytotoxicity of the NNC was evaluated in multiple cancer cell lines, including pancreatic, lung, and breast cancer lines. The cocrystal demonstrated superior growth inhibition compared to individual treatments (sup Figure S4). Notably, the highest inhibitory activity was observed in the H-1299 lung cancer cell line, indicating enhanced anticancer efficacy. The IC50 value of the cocrystal was significantly lower than that of the individual drugs, reflecting increased potency. Cytotoxicity analysis revealed that nafamostat alone exhibited relatively low toxicity across tested cell lines, with a maximum growth inhibition of 22.66 ± 3.11% in lung adenocarcinoma cells (Figure 2). Niclosamide showed moderate activity, with 19.68 ± 0.42% inhibition in A-549 cells at a tenfold lower concentration than nafamostat, and an IC50 value of 153.2 nM. In contrast, the NNC demonstrated enhanced efficacy, achieving 36.59 ± 4.39% inhibition in H-1299 cells at a low concentration of 30 nM, and 34.02 ± 3.12% inhibition in A-549 cells at 300 nM. However, limited activity was observed in MCF-7 and PANC-1 cells (sup Figure S5) under certain conditions, while MDA-MB cells showed increased proliferation (sup Figure S6) at higher concentrations. Nafamostat alone exhibited notable inhibition in MDA-MB cells at 30 µM.

3.6. In Vivo Tumor Growth Suppression Study

To further evaluate anticancer efficacy, the NNC was tested in an orthotopic pancreatic tumor mouse model. Treatment with NNC at doses of 15, 30, and 60 mg/kg resulted in significant tumor growth suppression compared to vehicle control. The NNC 15 group demonstrated nearly a twofold reduction in tumor weight, while the NNC 30 group showed a 1.74-fold reduction (Figure 3). Interestingly, higher doses did not result in improved efficacy, possibly due to reduced solubility and limited bioavailability at elevated concentrations. This observation suggests that optimal dosing is critical for maximizing therapeutic outcomes.

3.7. In Vivo Tumour Burden Study

Tumor burden analysis further supported these findings, with the NNC showing approximately 40-fold reduction compared to the control, and the NNC 30 group showing a 10-fold reduction (Figure 4). No significant changes in body weight were observed in the NNC-treated groups compared to the control, indicating good tolerability at lower doses. However, higher doses were associated with noticeable body weight changes, suggesting potential toxicity or reduced tolerability.

3.8. In Vivo Antivirus Efficacy

A smaller IC50 indicates superior efficacy, a larger CC50 indicates lower cytotoxicity, and a larger SI indicates superior inhibitory effect, considering toxicity. The IC50 values of the co-crystals were NNC=0.17 μM, which are approximately 45, 20, and 60 times higher than those of chloroquine 7.47 μM, remdesivir 3.48 μM, and lopinavir 10.3 μM, respectively; thus, they appear to have excellent efficacy in inhibiting viral infection (Figure 5). Although the CC50 values were similarly higher than the maximum concentration for both the NNC and the reference drug, the cell viability graph of the co-crystal showed a concentration-dependent decrease in cell survival rate starting from the lowest drug treatment concentration; this result is considered to indicate the possibility of cytotoxicity. The selectivity index (SI) value (Figure 6) of the cocrystal is approximately 290–310, which is about 15, 20, and 60 times higher than that of reference drugs chloroquine (SI=20.08), remdesivir (SI=14.35), and lopinavir (SI=4.85), respectively; therefore, it can be evaluated as a drug with good efficacy even when considering both the pharmacological effects and toxicity of the cocrystal simultaneously.
Overall, these results demonstrate that the NNC significantly enhances anticancer activity, particularly at lower doses, while maintaining acceptable safety profiles. NNC represents a promising strategy for improving the therapeutic performance of existing pharmaceutical agents. Research studies reflected that many anticancer drugs suffer from poor solubility and limited bioavailability, which restricts their clinical effectiveness [23]. Drug-drug cocrystal formation can enhance solubility and dissolution rates, leading to improved absorption and systemic availability. Furthermore, dual drugs with complementary mechanisms of action in a single cocrystal system may produce synergistic effects, resulting in enhanced antitumor efficacy. Therefore, the NNC presents an innovative approach for the treatment of cancer, particularly lung cancer, and warrants further investigation for clinical development.

4. Conclusions

Cocrystal is a successful drug development system, especially for improving the solubility and enhancing bioavailability. Niclosamide and nafomostate were a great combination of drug-drug cocrystal system for the treatment of cancer and anti-virus therapy, such as COVID 19. Significant results supported the evaluation and efficacy to prove the drug-drug candidate as a novel cocrystal and the data pathway for future development of NNC-based anticancer material in clinical patients. These findings could be helpful for patients with emergencies such as COVID-19, and more experiments and preclinical studies need to be done for further confirmation and to support patients’ compliance.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at the website of this paper posted on Preprints.org.

Author Contributions

S.E.B and R.B: Methodology, software, validation, formal analysis, investigation, resources, data curation, and writing—original draft preparation. Y.J.P: Conceptualization, methodology, investigation, resources, writing—review & editing, visualization, project administration, and funding acquisition. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Bio Industry Core Technology Department (20014890, Development of New Anti-cancer/Anti-infection product combined by Drug-Drug Cocrystal and Drug Repositioning Technology) funded by the Ministry of Trade Industry, Republic of Korea.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions of this study are provided within the article and its supplementary materials. Additional questions or requests for information may be directed to the corresponding authors.

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge financial support from the Bio Industry Core Technology Department of the Ministry of Trade Industry, Republic of Korea. This funding enabled the successful execution of the research project.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References

  1. Waring, M.J.; Arrowsmith, J.; Leach, A.R.; Leeson, P.D.; Mandrell, S.; Owen, R.M.; Pairaudeau, G.; Pennie, W.D.; Pickett, S.D.; Wang, J. An analysis of the attrition of drug candidates from four major pharmaceutical companies. Nature reviews Drug discovery 2015, 14, 475-486. [CrossRef]
  2. Dominguez-Gomez, G.; Díaz-Chávez, J.; Chávez-Blanco, A.; Gonzalez-Fierro, A.; Jiménez-Salazar, J.; Damián-Matsumura, P.; Gómez-Quiroz, L.; Dueñas-González, A. Nicotinamide sensitizes human breast cancer cells to the cytotoxic effects of radiation and cisplatin. Oncology reports 2015, 33, 721-728. [CrossRef]
  3. Siegel, R.L.; Giaquinto, A.N.; Jemal, A. Cancer statistics, 2024. CA: a cancer journal for clinicians 2024, 74, 12-49.
  4. Bray, F.; Laversanne, M.; Sung, H.; Ferlay, J.; Siegel, R.L.; Soerjomataram, I.; Jemal, A. Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA: a cancer journal for clinicians 2024, 74, 229-263. [CrossRef]
  5. Almarsson, Ö.; Zaworotko, M.J. Crystal engineering of the composition of pharmaceutical phases. Do pharmaceutical co-crystals represent a new path to improved medicines? Chemical communications 2004, 1889-1896. [CrossRef]
  6. Qiao, N.; Li, M.; Schlindwein, W.; Malek, N.; Davies, A.; Trappitt, G. Pharmaceutical cocrystals: An overview. International journal of pharmaceutics 2011, 419, 1-11. [CrossRef]
  7. Blagden, N.; de Matas, M.; Gavan, P.T.; York, P. Crystal engineering of active pharmaceutical ingredients to improve solubility and dissolution rates. Advanced drug delivery reviews 2007, 59, 617-630. [CrossRef]
  8. Osada, T.; Chen, M.; Yang, X.Y.; Spasojevic, I.; Vandeusen, J.B.; Hsu, D.; Clary, B.M.; Clay, T.M.; Chen, W.; Morse, M.A. Antihelminth compound niclosamide downregulates Wnt signaling and elicits antitumor responses in tumors with activating APC mutations. Cancer research 2011, 71, 4172-4182. [CrossRef]
  9. Zhu, N.; Zhang, D.; Wang, W.; Li, X.; Yang, B.; Song, J.; Zhao, X.; Huang, B.; Shi, W.; Lu, R. A novel coronavirus from patients with pneumonia in China, 2019. New England journal of medicine 2020, 382, 727-733. [CrossRef]
  10. Cucinotta, D.; COVID, M.V.W.D. a Pandemic., 2020, 91, 157-160. [CrossRef]
  11. Backer, V.; Sjöbring, U.; Sonne, J.; Weiss, A.; Hostrup, M.; Johansen, H.K.; Becker, V.; Sonne, D.P.; Balchen, T.; Jellingsø, M. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 1 trial of inhaled and intranasal niclosamide: A broad spectrum antiviral candidate for treatment of COVID-19. The Lancet Regional Health–Europe 2021, 4. [CrossRef]
  12. Nishimura, H.; Yamaya, M. A synthetic serine protease inhibitor, nafamostat mesilate, is a drug potentially applicable to the treatment of ebola virus disease. The Tohoku journal of experimental medicine 2015, 237, 45-50. [CrossRef]
  13. Hoffmann, M.; Kleine-Weber, H.; Schroeder, S.; Krüger, N.; Herrler, T.; Erichsen, S.; Schiergens, T.S.; Herrler, G.; Wu, N.-H.; Nitsche, A. SARS-CoV-2 cell entry depends on ACE2 and TMPRSS2 and is blocked by a clinically proven protease inhibitor. cell 2020, 181, 271-280. e278. [CrossRef]
  14. Atzrodt, C.L.; Maknojia, I.; McCarthy, R.D.; Oldfield, T.M.; Po, J.; Ta, K.T.; Stepp, H.E.; Clements, T.P. A Guide to COVID-19: a global pandemic caused by the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2. The FEBS journal 2020, 287, 3633-3650. [CrossRef]
  15. Ko, M.; Jeon, S.; Ryu, W.S.; Kim, S. Comparative analysis of antiviral efficacy of FDA-approved drugs against SARS-CoV-2 in human lung cells. Journal of medical virology 2021, 93, 1403-1408. [CrossRef]
  16. Niederau, C.; Crass, R.A.; Silver, G.; Ferrell, L.D.; Grendell, J.H. Therapeutic regimens in acute experimental hemorrhagic pancreatitis: effects of hydration, oxygenation, peritoneal lavage, and a potent protease inhibitor. Gastroenterology 1988, 95, 1648-1657.
  17. Horiuchi, A.; Iwatsuki, K.; Yonekura, H.; Ren, L.; Chiba, S. Gabexate and camostat, synthetic proteinase inhibitors, as direct inducing factors of water and bicarbonate secretion in the isolated and blood-perfused dog pancreas. The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics 1990, 252, 320-326. [CrossRef]
  18. Aakeröy, C.B.; Salmon, D.J. Building co-crystals with molecular sense and supramolecular sensibility. CrystEngComm 2005, 7, 439-448. [CrossRef]
  19. Schultheiss, N.; Newman, A. Pharmaceutical cocrystals and their physicochemical properties. Crystal growth and design 2009, 9, 2950-2967. [CrossRef]
  20. Datta, S.; Grant, D.J. Crystal structures of drugs: advances in determination, prediction and engineering. Nature reviews Drug discovery 2004, 3, 42-57. [CrossRef]
  21. Steed, J.W. The role of co-crystals in pharmaceutical design. Trends in pharmacological sciences 2013, 34, 185-193. [CrossRef]
  22. Karimi-Jafari, M.; Padrela, L.; Walker, G.M.; Croker, D.M. Creating cocrystals: A review of pharmaceutical cocrystal preparation routes and applications. Crystal Growth & Design 2018, 18, 6370-6387. [CrossRef]
  23. Stuurman, F.E.; Nuijen, B.; Beijnen, J.H.; Schellens, J.H. Oral anticancer drugs: mechanisms of low bioavailability and strategies for improvement. Clinical pharmacokinetics 2013, 52, 399-414. [CrossRef]
  24. Zhang, Z.; Yu, N.; Xue, C.; Gao, S.; Deng, Z.; Li, M.; Liu, C.; Castellot, J.; Han, S. Potential anti-tumor drug: Co-crystal 5-fluorouracil-nicotinamide. ACS omega 2020, 5, 15777-15782. [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Niclosamide, nafamostat and cocrystal were characterized by (a) NMR (b) PXRD (c) DSC (d) FTIR. .
Figure 1. Niclosamide, nafamostat and cocrystal were characterized by (a) NMR (b) PXRD (c) DSC (d) FTIR. .
Preprints 212019 g001
Figure 2. Cytotoxicity analysis of niclosamide, nafomostat, and NNC samples treated with different cancer cell lines, such as (a, b) Breast, (c, d) Pancreatic, (d, f) Lung cancer. Cell viability was measured after 48 hours of incubation at 37 °C and 5% CO2 atmosphere.
Figure 2. Cytotoxicity analysis of niclosamide, nafomostat, and NNC samples treated with different cancer cell lines, such as (a, b) Breast, (c, d) Pancreatic, (d, f) Lung cancer. Cell viability was measured after 48 hours of incubation at 37 °C and 5% CO2 atmosphere.
Preprints 212019 g002
Figure 3. In vivo tumor growth suppression study treated with NNC in different dosages in a intraperitoneal tumor suppressive animal over 80 days. (a) Experiment timeline, (b) Images of NNC treated animals, (c) Images of the tumor, (d) Animal body weight, (e) Tumor weight results data. Negative control with normal saline, cocrystal with 15 mkg and 30 mkg. There were no significant changes in body weight during the study. The tumor weight was not increased, indicating the suppression of tumor proliferation in 15 mpk and 30 mpk. The tumor size increased with 60 mpk sample that was not completely dissolved in the injection part, and a residual was observed after injection. The tumor burden decreased by increasing dose up to 30 mpk compared with vehicle treated group. P value *<0.05, **<0.005.
Figure 3. In vivo tumor growth suppression study treated with NNC in different dosages in a intraperitoneal tumor suppressive animal over 80 days. (a) Experiment timeline, (b) Images of NNC treated animals, (c) Images of the tumor, (d) Animal body weight, (e) Tumor weight results data. Negative control with normal saline, cocrystal with 15 mkg and 30 mkg. There were no significant changes in body weight during the study. The tumor weight was not increased, indicating the suppression of tumor proliferation in 15 mpk and 30 mpk. The tumor size increased with 60 mpk sample that was not completely dissolved in the injection part, and a residual was observed after injection. The tumor burden decreased by increasing dose up to 30 mpk compared with vehicle treated group. P value *<0.05, **<0.005.
Preprints 212019 g003
Figure 4. In vivo tumor burden study of NNC with different dosages of 15, 30, and 60 mpk. (a) Results of Tumor burden, (b) Tumor tissue was sectioned, stained, and imaged after the experiment. Tumor burden was high in the vehicle-treated group compared with NNC. Increasing concentration up to 30 mpk of NNC showed the tumor burden decay. Statistically significant differences were calculated with treatment and vehicle groups, and the P value was **<0.005, ***<0.0001.
Figure 4. In vivo tumor burden study of NNC with different dosages of 15, 30, and 60 mpk. (a) Results of Tumor burden, (b) Tumor tissue was sectioned, stained, and imaged after the experiment. Tumor burden was high in the vehicle-treated group compared with NNC. Increasing concentration up to 30 mpk of NNC showed the tumor burden decay. Statistically significant differences were calculated with treatment and vehicle groups, and the P value was **<0.005, ***<0.0001.
Preprints 212019 g004
Figure 5. Inhibitory effect of cells on COVID-19 infection cells was treated with NNC compared with standard drugs. The NNC showed high inhibition compared with Chloroquine, Remdesivir, and Lopinavir (P value ***<0.0001).
Figure 5. Inhibitory effect of cells on COVID-19 infection cells was treated with NNC compared with standard drugs. The NNC showed high inhibition compared with Chloroquine, Remdesivir, and Lopinavir (P value ***<0.0001).
Preprints 212019 g005
Figure 6. Sensitivity index (SI) was measured with NNC and standard drugs treated cells. The NNC resulted in high SI compared with Chloroquine, Remdesivir, and Lopinavir. The SI value was high in the NNC-treated group, indicating the drug safety margin value (P value ***<0.0001).
Figure 6. Sensitivity index (SI) was measured with NNC and standard drugs treated cells. The NNC resulted in high SI compared with Chloroquine, Remdesivir, and Lopinavir. The SI value was high in the NNC-treated group, indicating the drug safety margin value (P value ***<0.0001).
Preprints 212019 g006
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

Privacy Settings

© 2026 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated