Preprint
Article

This version is not peer-reviewed.

Binder-Free Co3O4 Nanoneedles on Nickel Foam for Selective Electrocatalytic Nitrate Reduction to Ammonium

Submitted:

19 April 2026

Posted:

21 April 2026

You are already at the latest version

Abstract
A binder-free Co₃O₄ nanoneedle electrode grown directly on nickel foam (Co₃O₄@NF) was fabricated by hydrothermal synthesis followed by calcination and evaluated for electrocatalytic nitrate reduction to ammonium. The integrated three-dimensional architecture combines the catalytic activity of Co₃O₄ with the high conductivity and open porosity of nickel foam, thus exposing abundant active sites, shortening electron-transfer pathways, and facilitating mass transport. Among the electrodes prepared at different calcination temperatures, Co₃O₄@NF calcined at 400 °C delivered the best performance. Under the optimal conditions of −1.4 V vs. Ag/AgCl, pH 7, and an initial NO₃⁻-N concentration of 50 mg L⁻¹, the electrode achieved 84.3% nitrate removal within 480 min together with 98.7% ammonium selectivity. Electrochemical measurements revealed a markedly enlarged electrochemically active surface area and reduced charge-transfer resistance after Co₃O₄ loading. Mechanistic analyses further suggested that nitrate reduction on Co₃O₄@NF proceeded predominantly through an indirect pathway while maintaining negligible nitrite accumulation. The electrode also showed good cycling stability and retained high ammonium selectivity in real water matrices. These results demonstrate that binder-free Co₃O₄ nanoneedles supported on nickel foam constitute a promising cathode architecture for coupling nitrate removal with ammonia recovery.
Keywords: 
;  ;  ;  ;  ;  

1. Introduction

Nitrate contamination in aquatic environments has become a persistent environmental challenge owing to the intensive use of nitrogen fertilizers, agricultural runoff, and the discharge of nitrate-containing industrial effluents. Elevated nitrate levels not only disturb aquatic ecosystems but also pose risks to human health through drinking-water exposure [1,2,3]. In complex water environments, nitrate frequently coexists with other pollutants, including antibiotics and microplastics, which can further intensify ecological stress and complicate treatment [4,5]. Therefore, nitrate pollution requires greater attention.
Current nitrate removal technologies mainly include physical methods, such as adsorption and ion exchange [6,7], chemical reduction [8], and biological treatment, the latter being the most widely applied approach in water treatment facilities [9]. However, biological treatment still suffers from several intrinsic limitations, including dependence on external carbon sources, sensitivity to temperature and toxic substances, and the generation of large amounts of sludge [10,11,12]. To overcome these limitations, emerging technologies such as membrane separation [13,14,15], photocatalysis [16], and electrocatalysis [17,18] have been increasingly investigated. Electrocatalytic nitrate reduction is particularly attractive because it can operate under mild conditions, is readily controllable, and offers the additional possibility of converting nitrate into value-added ammonia rather than simply removing nitrogen from water [19,20].
The cathode material is a decisive factor in electrocatalytic nitrate reduction because it governs the adsorption of nitrate and intermediates, the kinetics of interfacial electron transfer, and the final product distribution [21]. To improve electrocatalytic activity, single-metal electrodes based on iron (Fe), copper (Cu), zinc (Zn), nickel (Ni), cobalt (Co), platinum (Pt), and other metals have been extensively explored as potential cathode materials [22,23,24,25]. More recently, bimetallic catalytic materials have attracted increasing attention because synergistic interactions between different metals can reduce the overpotential and accelerate nitrate reduction kinetics. Accordingly, a series of bimetallic electrodes, including Co-Ru, Cu-Ni, and Cu-Pd, have been developed to enhance reaction performance [26,27,28,29]. For example, Cerrón-Calle et al. prepared a Cu/Co(OH)ₓ/Cu foam electrode and demonstrated that indirect nitrate reduction mediated by adsorbed hydrogen generated during the hydrogen evolution side reaction could improve both the performance and selectivity of the galvanostatic system [30]. Despite these advances, many catalysts still suffer from insufficient structural robustness, limited active-site accessibility, or poor long-term stability. Transition metal oxides and composite architectures therefore remain of considerable interest because they can provide multiple catalytic centers together with enhanced structural durability [31,32].
Among the reported cathode materials, cobalt is widely regarded as a promising candidate because of its favorable catalytic activity and economic feasibility [33]. In addition, the successful application of cobalt and its oxides in electrocatalytic reactions such as the carbon dioxide reduction reaction (CO₂RR) and oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) further highlights their potential for electrocatalytic nitrate reduction [34,35]. Nevertheless, conventional powder-coated electrodes generally require polymeric binders and additional conductive additives, which can introduce contact resistance, mask active sites, and compromise mechanical stability. Constructing a binder-free and self-supported cobalt oxide electrode is therefore an appealing strategy for improving catalytic efficiency and practical durability.
Nickel foam (NF) has been widely used in electrocatalysis because its continuous metallic framework provides rapid electron transport pathways, its porous structure offers sufficient space for active-site loading, and it exhibits excellent resistance to alkaline corrosion [36,37]. Compared with substrates such as carbon cloth and titanium mesh, nickel foam is more cost-effective, can be readily modified through in situ hydrothermal methods, and can generate interfacial synergistic effects with metal oxides, thereby further promoting catalytic kinetics [38,39]. For example, Yan et al. improved oxygen evolution reaction performance by fabricating a MnO₂/NiCo₂O₄/NF electrode, in which the synergistic effect between nickel foam and bimetallic oxides not only enhanced conductivity and mass transfer efficiency but also improved the intrinsic catalytic activity [40]. Compared with planar substrates such as titanium mesh or carbon cloth, NF can be readily modified through hydrothermal methods to form intimate catalyst-substrate interfaces and hierarchical nanostructures. These characteristics make NF a suitable platform for the fabrication of integrated electrocatalytic electrodes with high conductivity, strong adhesion, and efficient mass transfer.
Herein, we report a binder-free Co₃O₄ nanoneedle array grown directly on nickel foam (Co₃O₄@NF) through hydrothermal synthesis followed by calcination. The resulting electrode combines a self-supported three-dimensional framework with a high density of exposed Co-based active sites, thereby promoting nitrate adsorption, interfacial electron transfer, and product desorption. The structure-performance relationship was systematically examined by varying the calcination temperature, and the effects of operating parameters, reaction mechanism, stability, and real-water applicability were further evaluated. This work provides a simple and effective strategy for designing self-supported cobalt oxide cathodes for selective electrocatalytic nitrate-to-ammonium conversion.

2. Results

2.1. Structural Characterization of the Co3O4@NF Electrode

As shown in Figure 1a, pristine nickel foam exhibited a smooth surface, a three-dimensional interconnected framework, and pore sizes ranging from 200 to 500 μm [41]. After the hydrothermal treatment followed by calcination, the surface of the Co₃O₄@NF electrode was uniformly covered with a large number of nanoneedles, and the electrode color changed from purple to black. As shown in Figure 1b, Co₃O₄ vertically grew on the nickel foam skeleton in the form of nanoneedle arrays. This unique architecture markedly increased the specific surface area and provided abundant accessible Co²⁺/Co³⁺ active sites, which favored the adsorption and activation of NO₃⁻. Meanwhile, the number of exposed cobalt active sites and the mass transfer efficiency were significantly improved, thereby facilitating the nitrate reduction process. In addition, the self-supported porous structure enabled the rapid and uniform transport of nitrate ions throughout the electrode surface and promoted the timely desorption and release of reaction products, providing a structural basis for the enhanced nitrate removal performance.
Figure 1c shows the SEM-EDS elemental mapping results. The energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) analysis confirmed the homogeneous spatial distribution of Co, Ni, and O over the entire electrode surface, indicating the successful formation of cobalt oxide nanostructures on the substrate skeleton. Combined with Figures S1 and S2, the agreement between the elemental distribution maps and the overall spectrum further demonstrated that Co₃O₄ was successfully loaded onto the nickel foam substrate with high uniformity and purity, thus providing a reliable material basis for the subsequent electrochemical performance evaluation.
The X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of the electrodes are shown in Figure 1d,e. For pristine nickel foam, three distinct diffraction peaks appeared at 44.5°, 51.9°, and 76.4°, corresponding to the (111), (200), and (220) crystal planes of metallic Ni, respectively. For the Co₃O₄@NF electrode, characteristic diffraction peaks were observed at 18.9°, 31.3°, 36.9°, 59.4°, and 65.2°, which could be indexed to the (111), (220), (311), (511), and (440) crystal planes of Co₃O₄, respectively. These results confirmed the successful preparation of the Co₃O₄@NF electrode.
X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) was further conducted to investigate the surface chemical composition of the electrode. As shown in Figure 1f, the Co 2p spectrum of the Co₃O₄@NF electrode displayed two main peaks at 780 and 795 eV, corresponding to Co 2p₃/₂ and Co 2p₁/₂, respectively. The peaks located at 781.5 and 796.6 eV were assigned to Co²⁺, whereas those at 780 and 794.8 eV were attributed to Co³⁺. The satellite peaks at 768.8 and 804 eV originated from the shake-up excitation of Co²⁺. In addition, the Co³⁺/Co²⁺ molar ratio of the Co₃O₄@NF cathode was calculated to be 1.67, which was lower than the theoretical value of 2.0 for ideal Co₃O₄. This deviation suggests the presence of abundant oxygen vacancies and lattice defects on the electrode surface, which were beneficial for tuning the surface electronic structure and enhancing the adsorption and activation of nitrate ions. At the same time, this ratio ensured the presence of sufficient highly active Co³⁺ sites for effective NO₃⁻ adsorption and N–O bond cleavage, while retaining an appropriate amount of Co²⁺ to participate in the reversible Co³⁺/Co²⁺ redox cycle. As a result, interfacial electron transfer and reaction kinetics were accelerated. The moderate Co³⁺/Co²⁺ ratio therefore provided a favorable balance between active-site density and electron transport efficiency, which may account for the excellent catalytic activity, high selectivity, and good stability of the Co₃O₄@NF electrode in electrocatalytic nitrate reduction.

2.2. Electrocatalytic Performance and Parameter Optimization

2.2.1. Optimization of Electrode Calcination Temperature

The preparation of Co₃O₄ nanoneedles supported on nickel foam (Co₃O₄@NF) is strongly influenced by calcination temperature, which in turn affects the electrocatalytic performance of the resulting electrodes. Therefore, the crystal structure and nitrate reduction performance of electrodes prepared at different calcination temperatures (200–500 °C) were systematically investigated. Linear sweep voltammetry (LSV) was first performed to evaluate the electrochemical behavior of the electrodes calcined at different temperatures. As shown in Figure 2a, Co₃O₄@NF calcined at 400 °C, denoted as Co₃O₄@NF(400), exhibited the highest current density at the same potential, indicating the best electrochemical activity among the tested samples.
The influence of calcination temperature on the crystal structure of Co₃O₄ was further examined by XRD (Figure 1e). When the calcination temperature was 200 °C, the dominant diffraction peaks were nearly identical to those of pristine nickel foam, suggesting that no obvious structural transformation had occurred. When the temperature increased to 300 °C, weak diffraction peaks appeared at 18.9°, 31.3°, 36.9°, 59.4°, and 65.2°, corresponding to the (111), (220), (311), (511), and (440) crystal planes of Co₃O₄, respectively, indicating partial oxidation of cobalt hydroxide to Co₃O₄. For the electrodes calcined at 400 and 500 °C, well-defined diffraction peaks corresponding to Co₃O₄ were observed at the same 2θ positions, confirming the complete formation of Co₃O₄ crystals.
Figure 2b–d show the effect of calcination temperature on NO₃⁻-N removal under an applied potential of −1.4 V (vs. Ag/AgCl) and an initial NO₃⁻-N concentration of 50 mg L⁻¹. As shown in Figure 2f, the NO₃⁻-N removal efficiency increased from 31.1% to 53.6% when the calcination temperature increased from 200 to 300 °C and further increased to 83.4% at 400 °C. Correspondingly, the reaction rate constant successively increased by 101.3% and 141.5%, reaching 0.00384 min⁻¹ cm⁻². As the primary catalytic oxide phase, the amount of Co₃O₄ increased with increasing calcination temperature, thereby accelerating NO₃⁻-N reduction. According to the XRD results, Co₃O₄ exhibited favorable crystallinity at both 400 and 500 °C. However, when the calcination temperature was further increased to 500 °C, the NO₃⁻-N removal efficiency decreased to 59.4%, accompanied by a 48.7% decrease in the reaction rate constant. This decline may be attributed to damage to the three-dimensional crystal architecture at excessively high temperature, which adversely affected the NO₃⁻-N reduction process. Therefore, 400 °C was selected as the optimal calcination temperature for subsequent experiments.
The main reduction products, NH₄⁺ and NO₂⁻, formed during nitrate reduction were also analyzed. Figure 2e presents the Faradaic efficiencies of different Co₃O₄@NF electrodes. Among all samples, Co₃O₄@NF(400) exhibited the highest NH₄⁺ yield and current efficiency, reaching 82.3% and 53.0%, respectively. Notably, the concentration of NO₂⁻, a by-product of nitrate reduction, remained at a very low level for all Co₃O₄@NF electrodes throughout the experiments. This result may be attributed to the high catalytic activity of Co₃O₄@NF, which favored the direct reduction of NO₃⁻ to NH₄⁺. Meanwhile, Table 1 was obtained through calculation. It can be seen that the catalyst exhibits the maximum NH₃ yield of 0.628 μg·h⁻¹·cm⁻² at a calcination temperature of 400 °C. These findings collectively demonstrate that Co₃O₄@NF(400) exhibited excellent nitrate reduction performance and high selectivity toward NH₄⁺.

2.2.2. Electrochemical Testing

The electrochemically active surface area (ECSA) is an important parameter for evaluating the effective active surface area of a catalyst and is closely related to catalytic activity. In this study, the ECSA was estimated using the double-layer capacitance method. Cyclic voltammetry (CV) curves were recorded at different scan rates within a non-Faradaic potential window of 0.005–0.105 V (vs. Ag/AgCl), where no redox reaction occurred (Figure 3a). The scan rates were set at 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 mV s⁻¹. Linear fitting of current density against scan rate (Figure 3b) gave a double-layer capacitance (Cdl) of 23.52 mF cm⁻² for Co₃O₄@NF and 3.96 mF cm⁻² for bare NF [42]. The corresponding ECSA values were calculated to be 588 cm² for Co₃O₄@NF and 99 cm² for NF, indicating that Co₃O₄@NF possessed a much larger electrochemically active surface area and a greater number of accessible active sites.
Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) analysis (Figure 3c) showed that the loading of Co₃O₄ reduced the overall electrode resistance and accelerated electron transfer, thereby improving the electrocatalytic activity.

2.2.3. Effect of Initial Nitrate Concentration

Because nitrate concentrations in actual wastewater may vary over a wide range, the influence of the initial NO₃⁻ concentration on reduction performance was investigated to evaluate the catalytic capability of Co₃O₄@NF toward nitrate reduction. As shown in Figure 4a–c, when the initial NO₃⁻ concentration increased from 50 to 200 mg L⁻¹, the corresponding removal efficiency decreased from 84.4% to 49.9%, while the NH₄⁺ yield decreased from 82.3% to 48.6%.
Although the overall nitrate removal efficiency decreased, the total amount of removed NO₃⁻ and produced NH₄⁺ both increased with increasing nitrate concentration, while the selectivity toward NH₄⁺ remained at approximately 98%. This phenomenon may be explained by the suppression of the hydrogen evolution reaction at higher nitrate concentrations, which left more active sites available for nitrate reduction. Meanwhile, the elevated NO₃⁻ concentration may also enhance nitrate mass transfer during the electrochemical reaction.

2.2.4. Effect of Initial Voltage Intensity

As shown in Figure 5a–c, the NO₃⁻ removal efficiency increased markedly as the applied potential increased from −1.2 to −1.4 V. Specifically, when the potential increased from −1.3 to −1.4 V, the NO₃⁻ removal efficiency increased from 35.2% to 83.4%, accompanied by an increase in NH₄⁺ yield from 34.3% to 82.4%. When the potential was further increased to −1.5 V, the NO₃⁻ removal efficiency was similar to that at −1.4 V but slightly lower, and the NH₄⁺ yield also decreased slightly.
The enhanced NO₃⁻ removal efficiency can be interpreted according to Faraday’s law, which states that the amount of transformed species at the electrode surface is proportional to the number of electrons transferred. The decline in NO₃⁻ removal efficiency at higher potentials may be attributed to the intensified hydrogen evolution reaction (HER), which competed for active sites and inhibited nitrate electroreduction. In addition, excessive current density leads to higher energy consumption during electroreduction. Therefore, to balance nitrate removal efficiency and energy utilization, an applied potential of −1.4 V was selected for subsequent experiments.
As shown in Figure 5d, based on the polarization curve (Figure S3), the Tafel slope of the catalyst was fitted to be 66.2 mV dec⁻¹, indicating favorable electrocatalytic reaction kinetics over the as-prepared catalyst.

2.2.5. Effect of Initial pH

An increased proton (H⁺) concentration in the electrolyte promotes the hydrogen evolution reaction (HER), which competes with and suppresses NO₃⁻-N reduction. As shown in Figure 6a–c, the NO₃⁻-N removal efficiency was clearly restricted at an initial pH of 3 because of the strong competition between HER and nitrate reduction under acidic conditions.
When the initial pH increased from 3 to 7, the NO₃⁻-N removal efficiency increased markedly from 37.1% to 73.5% and then to 83.4%. However, only slight variation in removal efficiency was observed within the pH range of 7–11, with values of 83.4%, 83.7%, and 86.1%, respectively. These results indicate that the Co₃O₄@NF electrode maintained favorable and stable catalytic activity under both neutral and alkaline conditions.

2.3. Stability and Structural Integrity

Electrode stability is a key criterion for assessing practical application potential. In this study, six consecutive cycling experiments were conducted to evaluate the long-term stability of the Co₃O₄@NF catalyst. As shown in Figure 7, no obvious decrease in NO₃⁻ removal efficiency or NH₄⁺ production was observed after six cycles. The nitrate removal efficiencies of the Co₃O₄@NF electrode over the six cycles were 84.4%, 83.3%, 84.3%, 82.5%, 83.5%, and 81.8%, respectively. These results confirm that the Co₃O₄@NF electrode exhibited excellent stability during nitrate reduction and therefore has strong potential for practical engineering applications.
Figure 8a,b show SEM images of the Co₃O₄ nanoneedle/nickel foam electrode before and after the electrocatalytic reaction. The structural stability of the electrode during electrolysis was evaluated by comparing its morphology, crystal structure, and surface chemical state before and after reaction. The electrode retained its characteristic nanostructure after reaction, without obvious structural collapse or component leaching, indicating excellent structural integrity and cycling stability during electrocatalysis. The EDS mapping images and spectra in Figure 8c further showed that the oxygen content of the electrode did not change significantly after the reaction. These results further confirm the excellent stability of the Co₃O₄@NF electrode.

2.4. Electrocatalytic Nitrate Reduction Mechanism

The electrocatalytic nitrate reduction mechanism was further investigated through electrochemical measurements and radical trapping experiments. Figure 9a shows the variation trend of the LSV response after the addition of tert-butanol (TBA) to the electrolyte. As the TBA concentration increases, the current density decreases but remains higher than that in the nitrate-free electrolyte, indicating an attenuation of the current response. As shown in Figure 9b, when the TBA concentration rises to 10 mM, the NO₃⁻ removal efficiency decreases from 83.4% to 16.6%. Meanwhile, the NO₃⁻ removal efficiency drops to 11.4% at a TBA concentration of 100 mM. The NO₃⁻ removal efficiency is significantly reduced by 80.1% and 86.3%, respectively, demonstrating that both the direct reduction pathway and the indirect reduction pathway of Co₃O₄@NF are involved in the nitrate reduction process, with the indirect pathway playing a dominant role.
In addition, as presented in Figure 9c, density functional theory (DFT) calculations were performed on the direct and indirect reaction pathways of the catalyst. On the Co₃O₄(311) crystal plane, the free energy increase of the rate-determining step (RDS) for the direct reaction pathway is 0.5282 eV. In contrast, the calculated energy change of the rate-determining step for the indirect reaction pathway on the Co₃O₄(311) plane is considerably lower, at only 0.1873 eV. The detailed reaction pathways are shown in Figure S7. These results further confirm that the nitrate reduction reaction over Co₃O₄@NF is dominated by the indirect reaction pathway.
Based on the experimental results, NH₄⁺-N was identified as the main product of electrocatalytic nitrate reduction, whereas the concentration of nitrite, as an intermediate product, remained extremely low throughout the reaction. This finding indicates that nitrate underwent rapid, continuous, and deep reduction on the electrode surface and that the reaction likely followed a direct eight-electron transfer pathway. Intermediate species such as nitrite generated during the reaction could be rapidly reduced further without obvious desorption or accumulation and were ultimately converted into ammonium ions with high efficiency. Figure 10 shows the proposed reaction mechanism of nitrate on Co₃O₄@NF and the specific reaction equations are provided in the Supplementary Materials.

2.5. Performance in Real Water Matrices

The experimental procedure used for real wastewater was essentially the same as that described above, except that the sodium sulfate solution was replaced with Xiangjiang River water and secondary clarifier effluent. As shown in Figure 11, the nitrate removal efficiencies decreased to 65.98% and 62.85% in the two real water matrices, respectively, while high ammonia conversion efficiency was still maintained. Specifically, the ammonia conversion efficiency reached 95.2% in Xiangjiang River water and 87.1% in secondary clarifier effluent, with an initial ammonia nitrogen concentration of 6.2 mg N L⁻¹. These results indicate that the Co₃O₄@NF electrode retained high selectivity toward ammonia even in real water matrices, demonstrating promising application potential for ammonia production during practical wastewater treatment.

3. Discussion

The superior nitrate reduction performance of Co₃O₄@NF can be ascribed to the synergistic combination of electrode architecture and catalytic composition. The nickel foam substrate provides a continuous three-dimensional conductive scaffold, whereas the in situ grown Co₃O₄ nanoneedles supply abundant exposed catalytic sites and a shortened diffusion path for ions and electrons. Consistent with this structural design, Co₃O₄@NF exhibited a substantially larger electrochemically active surface area and lower charge-transfer resistance than bare NF, confirming that the integrated binder-free configuration effectively enhances interfacial electrochemical reactivity.
Calcination temperature was a critical parameter in determining the final catalytic behavior. At relatively low temperatures, the precursor was not fully converted into crystalline Co₃O₄, resulting in an insufficient density of active oxide sites. Calcination at 400 °C enabled the formation of well-defined Co₃O₄ while preserving the nanoneedle morphology and porous electrode framework. By contrast, further heating to 500 °C likely induced structural coarsening or partial deterioration of the hierarchical architecture, thereby reducing active-site accessibility and weakening electrocatalytic performance. These results highlight that catalytic efficiency depends on both phase evolution and morphological preservation.
The product distribution also indicates that Co₃O₄@NF favors deep nitrate reduction to ammonium rather than the accumulation of nitrite. The consistently low nitrite concentration suggests that once nitrite was formed, it was rapidly further reduced on the catalyst surface. Combined with the tert-butanol trapping experiments and DFT analysis, the data support the coexistence of direct electron-transfer and hydrogen-assisted indirect pathways, with the latter making the dominant contribution under the present conditions. Such mechanistic behavior is beneficial for achieving high ammonium selectivity while suppressing undesirable intermediate buildup.
From an application perspective, the catalyst retained high ammonium selectivity in both river water and secondary clarifier effluent, demonstrating a degree of tolerance toward complex water matrices. The decrease in nitrate removal efficiency observed in real waters nevertheless implies that coexisting ions and dissolved organic matter may compete for active sites or interfere with nitrate adsorption and interfacial reduction. Future studies should therefore evaluate long-term operation, energy consumption, matrix effects, and the integration of this process with downstream ammonia recovery or continuous-flow treatment systems.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Reagents and Materials

All reagents and solvents were of analytical grade and were used as received. Nickel foam (99.99%) was purchased from Alibaba. Cobalt nitrate hexahydrate (Co(NO₃)₂·6H₂O, 99%), urea (CO(NH₂)₂, ≥99%), ammonium fluoride (NH₄F, ≥99%), hydrochloric acid (HCl), sodium hydroxide (NaOH), acetone, absolute ethanol, ethylene glycol, sodium sulfate (Na₂SO₄, 99%), ammonium chloride (NH₄Cl, 99.99%), sodium nitrate (NaNO₃, 99%), and sodium nitrite (NaNO₂, 99%) were obtained from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd. All aqueous solutions were prepared with ultrapure deionized water.

4.2. Fabrication of the Binder-Free Co3O4@NF Cathode

Nickel foam (NF) was first cut into pieces measuring 3.0 × 2.0 cm². The cut NF was sequentially ultrasonically cleaned in acetone, 1 mol·L⁻¹ HCl, and absolute ethanol for 15 min each, followed by a final ultrasonic cleaning step in deionized water for 15 min to ensure complete removal of surface impurities. The cleaned NF was then dried in a vacuum oven at 60 °C for 12 h.
Subsequently, the Co₃O₄@NF foam cathode was fabricated through a combination of hydrothermal treatment and calcination. The precursor solution was prepared by dissolving 1 mmol Co(NO₃)₂·6H₂O, 6 mmol urea (CO(NH₂)₂), and 4 mmol ammonium fluoride (NH₄F) in 30 mL deionized water. The resulting solution was transferred into a 50 mL Teflon-lined stainless-steel autoclave, after which the dried NF was immersed in the solution. The autoclave was then sealed and heated in an electric oven at 120 °C for 8 h, allowing the uniform growth of Co(OH)₂ nanoneedle arrays on the NF substrate. After the hydrothermal reaction, the obtained electrode was rinsed with deionized water and vacuum-dried at 60 °C for subsequent use.
The Co₃O₄ nanoneedle-supported nickel foam electrode (Co₃O₄@NF) was obtained by annealing the as-prepared Co(OH)₂@NF in a muffle furnace at 400 °C for 120 min. In addition, control samples were prepared at different thermal oxidation temperatures (200, 300, and 500 °C) for comparison. The relevant reaction processes are shown below:
C o ( N O 3 ) 2 · 6 H 2 O + C O ( N H 2 ) 2 C o ( O H ) 2 + C O 2 ( g ) + 2 N H 4 N O 3 + 3 H 2 O ( g )
6 C o ( O H ) 2 + O 2 ( g ) 2 C o 3 O 4 + 6 H 2 O ( g )

4.3. Electrochemical Nitrate Removal Experiments

Electrochemical nitrate removal experiments were carried out using a CHI 760E electrochemical workstation (Chenhua Instruments Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China). A three-electrode system coupled with a single-chamber electrochemical reactor (150 mL) was employed. The Co₃O₄@NF foam electrode, with an effective immersed area of 1 cm² (1 × 1 cm²), was mounted on an electrode holder and used as the working electrode. A platinum sheet (1 × 1 cm²) and a silver/silver chloride (Ag/AgCl) electrode were used as the counter electrode and reference electrode, respectively.
Unless otherwise specified, the simulated wastewater consisted of 100 mL 0.05 mol·L⁻¹ sodium sulfate (Na₂SO₄) electrolyte containing 50 mg N·L⁻¹ sodium nitrate (NaNO₃). During each experiment, a constant potential was applied for a predetermined period. At regular time intervals, 0.75 mL aliquots were collected using a syringe for the determination of ammonia nitrogen (NH₄⁺-N), nitrate nitrogen (NO₃⁻-N), and nitrite nitrogen (NO₂⁻-N).
Concentrations were analyzed using a Shimadzu UV-2600 ultraviolet-visible (UV-Vis) spectrophotometer based on colorimetric methods. The absorbance of the reacted solutions was measured at 220, 275, 540, and 420 nm, respectively. The measured standard curves (Figure S4-6) were used for the determination of NO₃⁻-N, NO₂⁻-N, and NH₄⁺-N, respectively [43,44,45].

4.4. Characterization Methods

The morphology of the electrodes was characterized using field-emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM, TESCAN MIRA LMS, Czech Republic), and the corresponding elemental composition and distribution were analyzed using the attached energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) system. X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were recorded on a Rigaku SmartLab SE diffractometer (Japan) using Cu Kα radiation (λ = 1.54060 Å). X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) measurements were performed on a Shimadzu/Kratos AXIS SUPRA+ spectrometer (Japan), and all binding energies were calibrated against the C 1s peak at 284.8 eV.
Electrochemical measurements, including linear sweep voltammetry (LSV), cyclic voltammetry (CV), and electrochemical active surface area (ECSA) analysis, were conducted on an electrochemical workstation using a conventional three-electrode system, in which the Co₃O₄@NF electrode served as the working electrode, an Ag/AgCl electrode as the reference electrode, and a platinum plate as the counter electrode.

5. Conclusions

A binder-free Co₃O₄ nanoneedle array supported on nickel foam was successfully fabricated through hydrothermal growth followed by calcination. The resulting Co₃O₄@NF electrode provided a three-dimensional porous architecture, intimate catalyst-substrate contact, and abundant exposed active sites, all of which are advantageous for interfacial electron transfer and nitrate reduction. Among the tested samples, the electrode calcined at 400 °C delivered the best overall performance, indicating that an appropriate balance between Co₃O₄ formation and structural preservation is essential for efficient catalysis.
Under the optimal conditions of −1.4 V vs. Ag/AgCl, pH 7, and 50 mg L⁻¹ NO₃⁻-N, Co₃O₄@NF achieved 84.3% nitrate removal within 480 min together with 98.7% ammonium selectivity. Electrochemical characterization showed that Co₃O₄ loading substantially increased the electrochemically active surface area and decreased the charge-transfer resistance relative to bare NF, which is consistent with the improved catalytic behavior. In addition, the electrode maintained stable performance over repeated cycles and preserved high ammonium selectivity in real water matrices, highlighting its practical potential.
Mechanistic analyses suggested that nitrate conversion on Co₃O₄@NF involved both direct electrocatalytic reduction and hydrogen-assisted indirect reduction, with the indirect route likely dominating the overall process. The very low accumulation of nitrite further indicates rapid subsequent reduction of reaction intermediates on the catalyst surface. Overall, this study demonstrates that self-supported Co₃O₄ nanoneedles on nickel foam represent an effective cathode design for selective electrocatalytic nitrate-to-ammonium conversion and provide a useful basis for the development of binder-free electrodes for water treatment and nitrogen resource recovery..

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at the website of this paper posted on Preprints.org, Figure S1: XPS survey spectrum and high-resolution Co 2p spectrum of the Co₃O₄@NF electrode; Figure S2: Energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) spectra of bare NF and Co₃O₄@NF electrodes.; Figure S3: NO3--N standard curve; Figure S4: NO2--N standard curve; Figure S5: NH4+-N standard curve; Figure S6: Polarization curve of the Co₃O₄@NF electrode; Figure S7: Direct and Indirect Reaction Pathways of Co₃O₄ on the (311) Plane; Table S1: Comparison of the nitrate reduction performance of Co₃O₄@NF with representative electrocatalytic electrodes reported in the literature.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, software, investigation, data curation, writing—original draft preparation, visualization, Y.L., R.W.; methodology, validation, formal analysis,Y.L., J.Y., R.W.; resources, R.W.; writing—review and editing, H.C., P.X. and R.W.; supervision, P.X., R.W.; project administration, P.X., R.W.; funding acquisition, P.X. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Research Foundation of Education Bureau of Hunan Province, China(Grant No. 25B0050) and National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2019YFD1100101).

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
NF Nickel Foam
LSV Linear Sweep Voltammetry
CV Cyclic Voltammetry
ECSA Electrochemical Active Surface Area
Cdl Double-layer Capacitance
EIS Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy
HER Hydrogen Evolution Reaction
TBA tert-butanol
FE-SEM Field-Emission Scanning Electron Microscopy
EDS Energy-Dispersive X-ray Spectrometer
XRD X-ray Diffraction
XPS X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy
UV-Vis Ultraviolet-visible Spectrophotometry
RDS rate-determining step
DFT Density Functional Theory

References

  1. Moloantoa, K.M.; Khetsha, Z.P.; van Heerden, E.; Castillo, J.C.; Cason, E.D. Nitrate Water Contamination from Industrial Activities and Complete Denitrification as a Remediation Option. Water 2022, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Su, H.; Kang, W.; Li, Y.; Li, Z. Fluoride and nitrate contamination of groundwater in the Loess Plateau, China: Sources and related human health risks. Environmental Pollution 2021, 286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Liu, Z.; Wang, X.; Jia, S.; Mao, B. Multi-methods to investigate spatiotemporal variations of nitrogen-nitrate and its risks to human health in China's largest fresh water lake (Poyang Lake). Science of The Total Environment 2023, 863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Ma, L.; Li, Z.; He, G.; Liu, G.; Ji, M.; Liu, W. Effect of combined cadmium and doxycycline pollution on the nitrogen cycle in constructed ditch wetlands. Environmental Chemistry Letters 2024, 22, 989–995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Xing, Y.-F.; Zhu, X.-Y.; Dong, H.-B.; Huang, J.-H.; Duan, Y.-F.; Zhang, J.-S. Microplastics and Nitrite Stress Affect Physiological and Metabolic Functions of the Hepatopancreas in Marine Shrimp. Journal of Xenobiotics 2026, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Bae, B.-U.; Jung, Y.-H.; Han, W.-W.; Shin, H.-S. Improved brine recycling during nitrate removal using ion exchange. J Water Research 2002, 36, 3330–3340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Yu, Y.; Perumal, P.; Sithole, T.; Luukkonen, T. Recovery of ammonium and nitrate from wastewater using adsorption-based techniques: A review. Journal of Cleaner Production 2025, 519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zhang, J.; Wu, J.; Chao, J.; Shi, N.; Li, H.; Hu, Q.; Yang, X.J. Simultaneous removal of nitrate, copper and hexavalent chromium from water by aluminum-iron alloy particles. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology 2019, 227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zhang, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Shi, Z.; Chen, Y. Linking Genome-Centric Metagenomics to Kinetic Analysis Reveals the Regulation Mechanism of Hydroxylamine in Nitrite Accumulation of Biological Denitrification. Environmental Science & Technology 2022, 56, 10317–10328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Yan, L.; Miao, J.; Li, M.; Zhang, Y.; Si, W.; Liu, X.; Qiao, J.; Yang, Z.; Wang, P. Removal of nitrate by aerobic denitrification granular sludge under strongly alkaline and low carbon to nitrogen ratio conditions: Performance and mechanism. Bioresource Technology 2026, 449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Li, X.; Wang, B.; Ma, Y.; Jiang, T.; Peng, Y. Enhanced mesophilic fermentation of waste activated sludge by integration with in-situ nitrate reduction. Bioresource Technology 2023, 368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Chen, J.; Zhang, C.; Liu, Y.; Tian, J.; Guo, J. In-Situ Improvement of the Sediment Microenvironment by Nitrate in Tailwater of Wastewater Treatment Plants Combined with Aerobic Denitrifying Bacteria under Low-DO Regulation. Water 2024, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Chang, Y.S.; Ooi, B.S. Multiple nutrient recovery from aquaculture wastewater through vacuum membrane distillation. Chemical Engineering Journal 2026, 527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Liu, B.; Lu, D.; Zhang, T.; Shen, Y.; Qiu, Z.; Mao, X.; Wu, R. Sustainable approach for landfill leachate treatment through dielectric barrier discharge/ferrate (DBD/Fe(VI)) enhanced nanofiltration. Journal of Membrane Science 2025, 714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Lu, D.; Mao, X.; Wu, R.; Liu, B. Dielectric Barrier Discharge (DBD) enhanced Fenton process for landfill leachate nanofiltration: Organic matter removal and membrane fouling alleviation. Water Research 2024, 266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Tugaoen, H.O.N.; Garcia-Segura, S.; Hristovski, K.; Westerhoff, P. Challenges in photocatalytic reduction of nitrate as a water treatment technology. Science of The Total Environment 2017, 599-600, 1524–1551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Liu, B.; Sun, X.; Sun, W.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, L.; Bai, J.; Xu, G. La-doped carbon nanofibers loaded with Cu-Co nanocubes enable highly efficient series electrochemical catalysis for nitrate reduction in ammonia synthesis. Journal of Alloys and Compounds 2026, 1059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Hu, L.; Teng, M.; Zhao, Y.; Zhang, W.; Hu, H.; Cheng, X.; Yuan, W.; Yuan, J.; Zhang, C.; Li, F.; et al. Recent progress of two-dimensional materials for efficient electrochemical nitrate reduction. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering 2026, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Martínez, J.; Ortiz, A.; Ortiz, I. State-of-the-art and perspectives of the catalytic and electrocatalytic reduction of aqueous nitrates. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental 2017, 207, 42–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Meng, S.; Ling, Y.; Yang, M.; Zhao, X.; Osman, A.I.; Al-Muhtaseb, A.a.H.; Rooney, D.W.; Yap, P.-S. Recent research progress of electrocatalytic reduction technology for nitrate wastewater: A review. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering 2023, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Yan, C.; Lee, K.-L.; Troutman, J.P.; Brady, C.E.; Humphrey, S.M.; Cwiertny, D.M.; Mubeen, S.; Werth, C.J. Tailored copper-based cathode design advances economic viability of electrocatalytic nitrate treatment with ammonia recovery in a scalable flow reactor. Applied Catalysis B: Environment and Energy 2024, 357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Guo, J.; Zhang, L.H.; Guo, Y.; Shi, C.; Han, A.; Wang, D.; Yu, F. Oxygen-Incorporation-Engineered Interfacial Water Modulation on Single-Atom Cu Sites for Enhanced Dilute Nitrate Electroreduction. Angewandte Chemie International Edition 2025, 65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Meng, Z.; Priyadarsini, A.; Shi, K.; Ren, Z.; Subedi, D.; Israel, D.; Kaden, W.E.; Feng, X.; Kattel, S. pH-Dependent Electroreduction of Nitrate on Fe Single-Atom Catalyst. ChemSusChem 2025, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Wu, C.; Liang, G.; Xia, S.; Zhou, J.; Lichtfouse, E.; Cai, X.; Xu, S.; Liu, H. In situ-generated palladium nanoparticles promoted co-reduction of bromate and nitrate in hydrogenotrophic biofilms. Water Research 2025, 286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. García-Fernández, M.J.; Pastor-Blas, M.M.; Epron, F.; Sepúlveda-Escribano, A. Proposed mechanisms for the removal of nitrate from water by platinum catalysts supported on polyaniline and polypyrrole. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental 2018, 225, 162–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Zhou, F.; Lv, B.; Zhang, Y.; Wu, Y.; Wang, Y.; Luo, W. Carbon-constrained CoRu bimetallic catalysts enabling efficient electrocatalytic reduction of nitrate to ammonia. Journal of Power Sources 2025, 657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Qu, Y.; Li, X.; Xia, Y.; Lan, H.; Ding, L.; Zhong, J.; Chang, X. Enhanced nitrate reduction to ammonia using Cu-Ni catalyst: Synergistic mechanisms and reaction pathways. Journal of Environmental Sciences 2026, 159, 23–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zhao, C.; Wang, T.-H.; Chen, Z.W.; Wen, Z.; Jiang, Q. Multi-site activation in metal-doped CuPd alloy catalysts enhances nitrate electroreduction to ammonia. Materials Today Sustainability 2025, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Peng, C.; Wu, R.; Yang, Y.; Li, C.; Lin, Y.; Chen, S.; Kuai, Z.; Li, L. Hydrothermal formation of controllable hexagonal holes and Er2O3/Er2O3-RGO particles on silicon wafers toward superhydrophobic surfaces. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 2020, 580, 768–775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Cerrón-Calle, G.A.; Maya, A.; Leon, D.; Roldan, M.; Fajardo, A.S.; Sánchez-Sánchez, C.M.; Garcia-Segura, S. Unlocking sustainable nitrate reduction: Earth-abundant bimetallic electrodes under galvanostatic evaluation. Electrochimica Acta 2024, 489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Sahoo, S.; Wickramathilaka, K.Y.; Njeri, E.; Silva, D.; Suib, S.L. A review on transition metal oxides in catalysis. Frontiers in Chemistry 2024, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Krishnan, A.; Swarnalal, A.; Das, D.; Krishnan, M.; Saji, V.S.; Shibli, S.M.A. A review on transition metal oxides based photocatalysts for degradation of synthetic organic pollutants. Journal of Environmental Sciences 2024, 139, 389–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Gao, N.; Guo, M.; Tong, H.; Hou, G.; Ba, J.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, R.; Zhang, H.; Fu, X.; Cancellara, L.; et al. Atomically Dispersed Cobalt on Ionic Carbon Nitrides for Selective and Efficient Nitrate Electroreduction to Ammonia. Angewandte Chemie International Edition 2026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Farid, S.; Rashid, A. One-step dealloying-derived cobalt nanoelectrodes for highly efficient electroreduction of carbon dioxide. Fuel 2026, 411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Dharmaraj, K.; Hanna, R.; Ruske, F.; Douglas-Henry, D.; Lauermann, I.; Prathapani, S.; Reyes-Figueroa, P.; Rodriguez-Ayllon, Y.; Lu, Y.; Nicolosi, V.; et al. Ammonia tolerant alkaline oxygen reduction reaction on bimetallic cobalt spinels. Chemical Engineering Journal 2025, 522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Lin, Y.-P.; Chen, W.-H.; Fan, S.-C.; Cheng, K.-W. Evaluation of cell performance for Zn-CO2 batteries using bifunctional honeycomb-like ZnS/CuxS and S-doped NiO/Co3O4 electrocatalysts on Ni foams as gas cathodes. Journal of Energy Storage 2025, 139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. He, L.; Zeng, T.; Yao, F.; Zhong, Y.; Tan, C.; Pi, Z.; Hou, K.; Chen, S.; Li, X.; Yang, Q. Electrocatalytic reduction of nitrate by carbon encapsulated Cu-Fe electroactive nanocatalysts on Ni foam. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 2023, 634, 440–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Li, X.; Zhao, X.; Lv, J.; Jia, X.; Zhou, S.; Huang, Y.; Chang, F.; Zhang, H.; Hu, G. Self-supported porous copper oxide nanosheet arrays for efficient and selective electrochemical conversion of nitrate ions to nitrogen gas. Journal of Materials Science & Technology 2023, 137, 104–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Jonoush, Z.A.; Rezaee, A.; Ghaffarinejad, A. Electrocatalytic nitrate reduction using Fe0/Fe3O4 nanoparticles immobilized on nickel foam: Selectivity and energy consumption studies. Journal of Cleaner Production 2020, 242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Yan, K.-L.; Shang, X.; Gao, W.-K.; Dong, B.; Li, X.; Chi, J.-Q.; Liu, Y.-R.; Chai, Y.-M.; Liu, C.-G. Ternary MnO 2 /NiCo 2 O 4 /NF with hierarchical structure and synergistic interaction as efficient electrocatalysts for oxygen evolution reaction. Journal of Alloys and Compounds 2017, 719, 314–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Wu, H.S.; Tao, M.; Che, X.; Sun, Z.; Chen, K.; Wang, R.T. Visualization of gas–liquid two-phase flow in open-cell metal foams. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress. 2021, 40, 4152–4164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Pierożyński, B.; Kuczyński, M.; Mikołajczyk, T. Simple Nickel Foam Modification Procedures for Enhanced Ni Foam Supercapacitor Applications. Crystals 2024, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Station, H.E.P.M. Water Quality Determination of Nitrate Nitrogen Phenol Disulfonic Acid Spectrophotometry. 1987; GB/T 7480-1987, p. 8.
  44. Station, H.E.M.C. Water Quality Determination of Nitrite Nitrogen Spectrophotometry. 1987; GB/T 7493-1987, p. 8.
  45. Station, S.E.M.C. Water Quality. Determination of Ammonia Nitrogen. Nessler's Reagent Spectrophotometry 2009, HJ 535-2009, 9P.;A4. [Google Scholar]
  46. Su, L.; Li, K.; Zhang, H.; Fan, M.; Ying, D.; Sun, T.; Wang, Y.; Jia, J. Electrochemical nitrate reduction by using a novel Co3O4/Ti cathode. Water Res 2017, 120, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Duan, W.; Li, G.; Lei, Z.; Zhu, T.; Xue, Y.; Wei, C.; Feng, C. Highly active and durable carbon electrocatalyst for nitrate reduction reaction. Water Res 2019, 161, 126–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Zhu, T.; Chen, Q.; Liao, P.; Duan, W.; Liang, S.; Yan, Z.; Feng, C. Single-Atom Cu Catalysts for Enhanced Electrocatalytic Nitrate Reduction with Significant Alleviation of Nitrite Production. Small 2020, 16, e2004526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Zhang, Z.; Xu, Y.; Shi, W.; Wang, W.; Zhang, R.; Bao, X.; Zhang, B.; Li, L.; Cui, F. Electrochemical-catalytic reduction of nitrate over Pd–Cu/γAl2O3 catalyst in cathode chamber: Enhanced removal efficiency and N2 selectivity. Chemical Engineering Journal 2016, 290, 201–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Li, M.; Feng, C.; Zhang, Z.; Lei, X.; Chen, R.; Yang, Y.; Sugiura, N. Simultaneous reduction of nitrate and oxidation of by-products using electrochemical method. J Hazard Mater 2009, 171, 724–730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Chen, M.; Bi, J.; Huang, X.; Wang, T.; Wang, Z.; Hao, H. Bi2O3 nanosheets arrays in-situ decorated on carbon cloth for efficient electrochemical reduction of nitrate. Chemosphere 2021, 278, 130386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. SEM images of the (a) Ni foam, (b) Co3O4 @Ni foam. (c) EDS mapping of the Co3O4 @Ni foam electrode. XRD patterns of (d) Ni foam and Co3O4 @Ni foam electrodes and (e) electrodes calcined at various temperatures. (f) XPS spectra of Co 2p for Co3O4 @Ni foam electrode. SEM images of (a) Ni foam and (b) Co₃O₄@Ni foam. (c) EDS mapping images of the Co₃O₄@Ni foam electrode. XRD patterns of (d) Ni foam and Co₃O₄@Ni foam electrodes and (e) electrodes calcined at different temperatures. (f) Co 2p XPS spectrum of the Co₃O₄@Ni foam electrode.
Figure 1. SEM images of the (a) Ni foam, (b) Co3O4 @Ni foam. (c) EDS mapping of the Co3O4 @Ni foam electrode. XRD patterns of (d) Ni foam and Co3O4 @Ni foam electrodes and (e) electrodes calcined at various temperatures. (f) XPS spectra of Co 2p for Co3O4 @Ni foam electrode. SEM images of (a) Ni foam and (b) Co₃O₄@Ni foam. (c) EDS mapping images of the Co₃O₄@Ni foam electrode. XRD patterns of (d) Ni foam and Co₃O₄@Ni foam electrodes and (e) electrodes calcined at different temperatures. (f) Co 2p XPS spectrum of the Co₃O₄@Ni foam electrode.
Preprints 209195 g001
Figure 2. (a) LSV curves of catalysts calcined at different temperatures (experimental conditions: 50 mg L⁻¹ NO₃⁻-N, 50 mM Na₂SO₄, scan rate 10 mV s⁻¹). Nitrate removal performance of catalysts prepared at different calcination temperatures: (b) NO₃⁻-N removal curves, (c) NO₂⁻-N concentration, and (d) NH₄⁺-N concentration (experimental conditions: 50 mg L⁻¹ NO₃⁻-N, 50 mM Na₂SO₄, pH 7, voltage −1.4 V vs. Ag/AgCl). (e) Faradaic efficiency and (f) reaction rate constant of catalysts prepared at different calcination temperatures.
Figure 2. (a) LSV curves of catalysts calcined at different temperatures (experimental conditions: 50 mg L⁻¹ NO₃⁻-N, 50 mM Na₂SO₄, scan rate 10 mV s⁻¹). Nitrate removal performance of catalysts prepared at different calcination temperatures: (b) NO₃⁻-N removal curves, (c) NO₂⁻-N concentration, and (d) NH₄⁺-N concentration (experimental conditions: 50 mg L⁻¹ NO₃⁻-N, 50 mM Na₂SO₄, pH 7, voltage −1.4 V vs. Ag/AgCl). (e) Faradaic efficiency and (f) reaction rate constant of catalysts prepared at different calcination temperatures.
Preprints 209195 g002
Figure 3. Electrochemical characterization of Co₃O₄@NF in the non-Faradaic region: (a) CV curves, (b) Cdl fitting curve, and (c) EIS plot.
Figure 3. Electrochemical characterization of Co₃O₄@NF in the non-Faradaic region: (a) CV curves, (b) Cdl fitting curve, and (c) EIS plot.
Preprints 209195 g003
Figure 4. Effect of initial nitrate concentration on electrode performance: (a) NO₃⁻-N removal curves, (b) NO₃⁻-N removal efficiency and NH₄⁺-N production, and (c) NO₂⁻-N production.
Figure 4. Effect of initial nitrate concentration on electrode performance: (a) NO₃⁻-N removal curves, (b) NO₃⁻-N removal efficiency and NH₄⁺-N production, and (c) NO₂⁻-N production.
Preprints 209195 g004
Figure 5. Effect of applied potential on electrode performance: (a) NO₃⁻-N removal curves, (b) NO₃⁻-N removal efficiency and NH₄⁺-N production, (c) NO₂⁻-N production, and (d) Tafel slope of Co₃O₄@NF.
Figure 5. Effect of applied potential on electrode performance: (a) NO₃⁻-N removal curves, (b) NO₃⁻-N removal efficiency and NH₄⁺-N production, (c) NO₂⁻-N production, and (d) Tafel slope of Co₃O₄@NF.
Preprints 209195 g005
Figure 6. Effect of initial pH on electrode performance: (a) NO₃⁻-N removal curves, (b) NO₃⁻-N removal efficiency and NH₄⁺-N production, and (c) NO₂⁻-N production.
Figure 6. Effect of initial pH on electrode performance: (a) NO₃⁻-N removal curves, (b) NO₃⁻-N removal efficiency and NH₄⁺-N production, and (c) NO₂⁻-N production.
Preprints 209195 g006
Figure 7. NO₃⁻-N removal efficiency and NH₄⁺-N production during six consecutive cycles.
Figure 7. NO₃⁻-N removal efficiency and NH₄⁺-N production during six consecutive cycles.
Preprints 209195 g007
Figure 8. SEM images of Co₃O₄@NF (a) before testing and (b) after testing; (c) EDS mapping image of Co₃O₄@NF after testing.
Figure 8. SEM images of Co₃O₄@NF (a) before testing and (b) after testing; (c) EDS mapping image of Co₃O₄@NF after testing.
Preprints 209195 g008
Figure 9. (a) NO₃⁻-N removal curves after the addition of TBA at different concentrations; (b) LSV curves of Co₃O₄@NF under different reaction conditions (scan rate 10 mV s⁻¹); (c) DFT calculations of direct and indirect reaction pathways for Co₃O₄ (311).
Figure 9. (a) NO₃⁻-N removal curves after the addition of TBA at different concentrations; (b) LSV curves of Co₃O₄@NF under different reaction conditions (scan rate 10 mV s⁻¹); (c) DFT calculations of direct and indirect reaction pathways for Co₃O₄ (311).
Preprints 209195 g009
Figure 10. A proposed mechanism for the nitrate reduction reaction occurring on Co₃O₄@NF.
Figure 10. A proposed mechanism for the nitrate reduction reaction occurring on Co₃O₄@NF.
Preprints 209195 g010
Figure 11. NO₃⁻-N removal efficiency and NH₄⁺-N production in different water matrices.
Figure 11. NO₃⁻-N removal efficiency and NH₄⁺-N production in different water matrices.
Preprints 209195 g011
Table 1. NH3 yield per cm-2 of catalyst at different calcination temperatures.
Table 1. NH3 yield per cm-2 of catalyst at different calcination temperatures.
Samples NH₃ yield rate (mg‧h-1‧cm-2)
200°C 300°C 400°C 500°C
Co₃O₄@NF 0.229 0.405 0.628 0.448
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

Privacy Settings

© 2026 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated