Submitted:
07 April 2026
Posted:
09 April 2026
You are already at the latest version
Abstract

Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Sample Collection
2.2. Isolation of Endophytic Bacterial Isolates
2.3. Phenotypic/Biochemical Characterization and Molecular Identification
2.3.1. Morphological and Biochemical Characteristics
2.3.2. Molecular Identification of Bacterial Endophytes
DNA Extraction
PCR Amplification of 16S rRNA and Sequencing
Bioinformatics Analysis
2.4. Characterization of Endophytic Bacteria
2.4.1. IAA Production Assay
2.4.2. Nitrogen Fixation Assay
2.5. Seed Preparation and Bacterial Inoculation
2.6. Greenhouse Pot Trials
Growth Medium and Soil Properties
Data Collection
2.7. Statistical Analysis
3. Results
3.1. Morphological and Biochemical Characterization
3.2. Molecular Identification of Strains C-14 and C-27
3.3. Evaluation of Plant Growth-Promoting Traits
3.4. Evaluation of Pot Experiments
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Lahouar, L.; Ghrairi, F.; El Arem, A.; Medimagh, S.; El Felah, M.; Ben Salem, H.; Achour, L. BIOCHEMICAL COMPOSITION AND NUTRITIONAL EVALUATION OF BARLEY RIHANE (HORDEUM VULGARE L). Afr. J. Tradit. Complement. Altern. Med. 2016, 14, 310–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ali, A.; Ullah, Z.; Ullah, R.; Kazi, M. RETRACTED: Barley a nutritional powerhouse for gut health and chronic disease defense. Heliyon 2024, 10, e38669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Fasusi, O.A.; Cruz, C.; Babalola, O.O. Agricultural Sustainability: Microbial Biofertilizers in Rhizosphere Management. Agriculture 2021, 11, 163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aleynova, O.A.; Kiselev, K.V. Interaction of Plants and Endophytic Microorganisms: Molecular Aspects, Biological Functions, Community Composition, and Practical Applications. Plants 2023, 12, 714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- da Silveira, A.P.D.; Iório, R.d.P.F.; Marcos, F.C.C.; Fernandes, A.O.; de Souza, S.A.C.D.; Kuramae, E.E.; Cipriano, M.A.P. Exploitation of new endophytic bacteria and their ability to promote sugarcane growth and nitrogen nutrition. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 2018, 112, 283–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Walitang, D.I.; Kim, K.; Madhaiyan, M.; Kim, Y.K.; Kang, Y.; Sa, T. Characterizing endophytic competence and plant growth promotion of bacterial endophytes inhabiting the seed endosphere of Rice. BMC Microbiol. 2017, 17, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Uçar, C.P.; Selem, E.; Tunçtürk, R.; Tunçtürk, M.; Akköprü, A. The Effect of Some Endophytic Bacteria on Seedling Growth and Physiological Properties of Salvia officinalis L. 2023, 33, 130–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Amaresan, N.; Jayakumar, V.; Thajuddin, N. Isolation and characterization of endophytic bacteria associated with chilli (Capsicum annuum) grown in coastal agricultural ecosystem. Indian Journal of Biotechnology 2014, 13(2), 247–255. [Google Scholar]
- Palleroni, N.J.; Krieg, N.R.; Holt, J.G. Bergey's manual of systematic bacteriology; The Willian and Wilkins. Co: Baltimore, 1984; pp. 141–219. [Google Scholar]
- Rahmoune, B.; Morsli, A.; Khelifi-Slaoui, M.; Khelifi, L.; Strueh, A.; Erban, A.; Kopka, J.; Prell, J.; van Dongen, J.T. Isolation and characterization of three new PGPR and their effects on the growth of Arabidopsis and Datura plants. J. Plant Interactions 2016, 12, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gang, S.; Sharma, S.; Saraf, M.; Buck, M.; Schumacher, J. Analysis of indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) production in Klebsiella by LC-MS/MS and the Salkowski method. Bio-Protocol 2019, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Park, M.; Kim, C.; Yang, J.; Lee, H.; Shin, W.; Kim, S.; Sa, T. Isolation and characterization of diazotrophic growth promoting bacteria from rhizosphere of agricultural crops of Korea. Microbiol. Res. 2005, 160, 127–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Heinonsalo, J.; Frey-Klett, P.; Pierrat, J.-C.; Churin, J.-L.; Vairelles, D.; Garbaye, J. Fate, tree growth effect and potential impact on soil microbial communities of mycorrhizal and bacterial inoculation in a forest plantation. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2004, 36, 211–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zytynska, S.E.; Eicher, M.; Rothballer, M.; Weisser, W.W. Microbial-Mediated Plant Growth Promotion and Pest Suppression Varies Under Climate Change. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Slimani, A.; Raklami, A.; Oufdou, K.; Meddich, A. Isolation and Characterization of PGPR and Their Potenzial for Drought Alleviation in Barley Plants. Gesunde Pflanz. 2022, 75, 377–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bhutani, N.; Maheshwari, R.; Negi, M.; Suneja, P. Optimization of IAA production by endophytic Bacillus spp. from Vigna radiata for their potential use as plant growth promoters. Isr. J. Plant Sci. 2018, 65, 83–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khianngam, S.; Meetum, P.; Na Chiangmai, P.; Tanasupawat, S. Identification and Optimization of Indole-3-Acetic Acid Production of Endophytic Bacteria and Their Effects on Plant Growth. Trop. Life Sci. Res. 2023, 34, 219–239–219–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Solano-Alvarez, N.; Valencia-Hernández, J.A.; Rico-García, E.; Torres-Pacheco, I.; Ocampo-Velázquez, R.V.; Escamilla-Silva, E.M.; Romero-García, A.L.; Alpuche-Solís, Á.G.; Guevara-González, R.G. A Novel Isolate of Bacillus cereus Promotes Growth in Tomato and Inhibits Clavibacter michiganensis Infection under Greenhouse Conditions. Plants 2021, 10, 506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Widowati, T.; Nuriyanah; Nurjanah, L.; Lekatompessy, S.J.R.; Simarmata, R. Bioproduction of indole acetic acid by endophytic bacteria of Bacillus strains isolated from chili (Capsicum annuum L.) and its potential for supporting the chili seedlings. In THE FIRST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON NEUROSCIENCE AND LEARNING TECHNOLOGY (ICONSATIN; LOCATION OF CONFERENCE, IndonesiaDATE OF CONFERENCE, 2021; p. 020018. [Google Scholar]
- Baris, O.; Sahin, F.; Turan, M.; Orhan, F.; Gulluce, M. Use of Plant-Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR) Seed Inoculation as Alternative Fertilizer Inputs in Wheat and Barley Production. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 2014, 45, 2457–2467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hafez, Y.; Attia, K.; Alamery, S.; Ghazy, A.; Al-Doss, A.; Ibrahim, E.; Rashwan, E.; El-Maghraby, L.; Awad, A.; Abdelaal, K. Beneficial Effects of Biochar and Chitosan on Antioxidative Capacity, Osmolytes Accumulation, and Anatomical Characters of Water-Stressed Barley Plants. Agronomy 2020, 10, 630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ma, J.; Li, Y.; Chen, F.; Sun, Y.; Zhu, Y.; Wang, L. Bacillus mycoides PM35 in combination with titanium dioxide (TiO2)⎯nanoparticles enhanced morpho-physio-biochemical attributes in Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) under cadmium stress. Chemosphere 2023, 323, 138224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Anušauskas, J.; Steponavičius, D.; Romaneckas, K.; Lekavičienė, K.; Zaleckas, E.; Sendžikienė, E. The Influence of Bacteria-Inoculated Mineral Fertilizer on the Productivity and Profitability of Spring Barley Cultivation. Plants 2023, 12, 1227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Malik, L.; Sanaullah, M.; Mahmood, F.; Hussain, S.; Shahzad, T. Co-application of biochar and salt tolerant PGPR to improve soil quality and wheat production in a naturally saline soil. Rhizosphere 2024, 29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gulzar, A.B.M.; Mazumder, P.B. Seed priming and subsequent inoculation of drought-tolerant plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria Bacillus tropicus KH90 improves rice (Oryza sativa L.) plant health under drought and non-drought conditions. Cereal Res. Commun. 2024, 53, 1051–1071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nandni; Rani, S.; Dhiman, I.; Wati, L. Biopriming with multifarious sulphur-oxidizing bacteria improve in vitro Vigna radiata L. (mung bean) and Brassica juncea L. (mustard) seed germination. Folia Microbiol. 2024, 70, 427–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jaya, D.K.; Giyanto, G.; Nurhidayat, N.; Antonius, S. Isolation, identification, and detection of ACC deaminase gene-encoding rhizobacteria from rhizosphere of stressed pineapple. Indones. J. Biotechnol. 2019, 24, 17–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Güler, M. Identification of beneficial bacteria in Rosemary rhizospheres and determination of plant growth promoting (PGP) potential. J. Agric. Fac. Gaziosmanpasa Univ. 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ejaz, S.; Batool, S.; Anjum, M.A.; Naz, S.; Qayyum, M.F.; Naqqash, T.; Shah, K.H.; Ali, S. Effects of inoculation of root-associative Azospirillum and Agrobacterium strains on growth, yield and quality of pea (Pisum sativum L.) grown under different nitrogen and phosphorus regimes. Sci. Hortic. 2020, 270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Raza, A.; Ejaz, S.; Saleem, M.S.; Hejnak, V.; Ahmad, F.; Ahmed, M.A.A.; Alotaibi, S.S.; El-Shehawi, A.M.; Alsubeie, M.S.; Zuan, A.T.K. Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria improve growth and yield related attributes of chili under low nitrogen availability. PLOS ONE 2021, 16, e0261468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Myresiotis, C.K.; Vryzas, Z.; Papadopoulou-Mourkidou, E. Enhanced root uptake of acibenzolar-S-methyl (ASM) by tomato plants inoculated with selected Bacillus plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR). Appl. Soil Ecol. 2014, 77, 26–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Negi, R.; Kaur, T.; Devi, R.; Kour, D.; Yadav, A.N. RETRACTED: Assessment of nitrogen-fixing endophytic and mineral solubilizing rhizospheric bacteria as multifunctional microbial consortium for growth promotion of wheat and wild wheat relative Aegilops kotschyi. Heliyon 2022, 8, e12579–e12579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shahzad, A.; Aslam, U.; Ferdous, S.; Qin, M.; Siddique, A.; Billah, M.; Naeem, M.; Mahmood, Z.; Kayani, S. Combined effect of endophytic Bacillus mycoides and rock phosphate on the amelioration of heavy metal stress in wheat plants. BMC Plant Biol. 2024, 24, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nauanova, A.; Shaikhin, S.; Ospanova, S.; Makenova, M.; Shumenova, N.; Bostubayeva, M. Enhancing Spring Barley Grain Yield with Local Biofertilizers in the Semi-Arid Steppe Zone of Northern Kazakhstan. Int. J. Des. Nat. Ecodynamics 2024, 19, 371–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Purwanto, P.; Suharti, W.S. Nutrient Uptake, Chlorophyll Content, and Yield of Rice (Oryza sativa L.) Under the Application of PGPR Consortium. Biosaintifika: J. Biol. Biol. Educ. 2021, 13, 336–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bagues, M.; Neji, M.; Karbout, N.; Boussora, F.; Triki, T.; Guasmi, F.; Nagaz, K. Mitigating Salinity Stress in Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) through Biochar and NPK Fertilizers: Impacts on Physio-Biochemical Behavior and Grain Yield. Agronomy 2024, 14, 317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Emami, T.; Mirzaeiheydari, M.; Maleki, A.; Bazgir, M. Effect of native growth promoting bacteria and commercial biofertilizers on growth and yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum) and barley (Hordeum vulgare) under salinity stress conditions. Cell. Mol. Biol. 2019, 65, 22–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jamily, A.S.; Koyama, Y.; Win, T.A.; Toyota, K.; Chikamatsu, S.; Shirai, T.; Uesugi, T.; Murakami, H.; Ishida, T.; Yasuhara, T. Effects of inoculation with a commercial microbial inoculant Bacillus subtilis C-3102 mixture on rice and barley growth and its possible mechanism in the plant growth stimulatory effect. J. Plant Prot. Res. 2023, 193-205–193-205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abideen, Z.; Cardinale, M.; Zulfiqar, F.; Koyro, H.-W.; Rasool, S.G.; Hessini, K.; Darbali, W.; Zhao, F.; Siddique, K.H. Seed Endophyte bacteria enhance drought stress tolerance in Hordeum vulgare by regulating, physiological characteristics, antioxidants and minerals uptake. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 980046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gul, F.; Khan, I.U.; Rutherford, S.; Dai, Z.-C.; Li, G.; Du, D.-L. Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria and biochar production from Parthenium hysterophorus enhance seed germination and productivity in barley under drought stress. Front. Plant Sci. 2023, 14, 1175097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ferioun, M.; Zouitane, I.; Bouhraoua, S.; Belahcen, D.; Srhiouar, N.; Louahlia, S.; El Ghachtouli, N. PGPR consortia promote soil quality and functioning in barley rhizosphere under different levels of drought stress. Ecol. Front. 2024, 45, 444–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]






| Soil characteristics | Value | Soil characteristics | Value |
| ECe* (dS m-1) | 2.6 | Total K (µg kg-1) | 18.2 |
| Soil pH | 5.3 | Total Fe (µg kg-1) | 2.33 |
| Total N (µg kg-1) | 13.1 | Total Zn (µg kg-1) | 665 |
| Total P (µg kg-1) | 3.98 | Total Cu (µg kg-1) | 160 |
| Total Mn (µg kg-1) | 2.15 | Total OM (%) | 0.84 |
| Isolate Code | Isolates |
Gram Characteristic |
Biochemical Characteristics |
Endospor forming | |||
|
Gram reaction |
KOH 3% |
Catalase | Oxidase | Motility | |||
| C-14 | Bacillus mycoides | + | - | + | + | + | + |
| C-27 | Bacillus tropicus | + | - | - | + | + | + |
| Isolate ID | NCBI Accession ID | Taxonomic Closest relative | Percent Identity |
|---|---|---|---|
| C-14 | PQ610418 | Bacillus mycoides | 99.93 % |
| C-27 | PQ610419 | Bacillus tropicus | 99.72% |
| Isolate Code | Endophytic isolates | NF |
IAAP |
| C-14 | Bacillus mycoides | + | + |
| C-27 | Bacillus tropicus | + | + |
| Isolates |
Root length (cm) (Mean± SD) |
Stem length (cm) (Mean± SD) |
Fresh Weight (mg) (Mean ± SD) |
Dry Weight (mg) (Mean ± SD) |
SPAD units | ||
| Root | Stem | Root | Stem | ||||
| A1(C-14) | 16.03±0.73ab |
24.1±0.91ab | 51.9±2.02b | 93.03±0.75a | 4.65±0.46b | 15.11±0.29ab | 45.6± 0.75b |
| A2 (C-27) | 17.23±1.02a |
26.2±1.47a | 60.03±1.45a | 95.0±1.30a | 6.36±0.42a | 16.23±0.62a |
47.2± 0.47a |
| A3Consortium(A1+A2) | 15.8± 0.62ab | 21.5±0.88b | 47.2±0.45c | 89.1±0.43b | 4.22±0.37b | 15.02±0.9b | 44.5±0.42a |
|
A4 (Control) |
14.6±0.75b* | 15.03±0.83c | 39.5±1.30d | 86.7±1.45b | 3.14±0.29c | 14.55±0.53b | 43.1± 0.4b |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.